Skip to main content

Full text of "The book of the prophet Isaiah"

See other formats


ae ΦΉΣ: 
a 23 
ets eee 


bps! 
none 


Me a ee Grn 
x3 i 
Jone 


παν πες τον 
τι ΤΙ eT τας oe 
a Ὄ: Se eee ate 


oe 


Ζ ae 22. Abajo 


Pd 


ad Pre 


«οὗ 


ΗΝ 
_ 


Pinay f 


wes ee 


oe ren 


»" 


τοις, 


THE BOOK 


Or 


THE PROPHET ISAIAH, 


TRANSLATED FROM THE ORIGINAL HEBREW ; 


WITH A 


COMMENTARY, 


CRITICAL, PHILOLOGICAL, AND EXEGETICAL: 


TO WHICH IS PREFIXED, 


AN INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION 


ON 


THE LIFE AND TIMES OF THE PROPHET; 
THE CHARACTER OF HIS STYLE; THE AUTHENTICITY AND INTEGRITY OF THE 
BOOK; AND THE PRINCIPLES OF PROPHETICAL INTERPRETATION. 


BY THE 


REV. Ε΄ HENDERSON, D.D. 


AUTHOR OF ‘‘LECTURES ON DIVINE INSPIRATION,” ‘‘ BIBLICAL RESEARCHES AND 
TRAVELS IN RUSSIA,” “ICELAND,” ETC. 


SECOND EDITION. 


Nobis propositum est Esaiam per nos intelligi, et nequaquam sub Esaize 
occasione nostra verba laudari.—H1iERon. ap Eustocu. 


LONDON : 
HAMILTON, ADAMS, AND CO. 


33, PATERNOSTER ROW. 
M DCCC LVII. 


LONDON: 
R, CLAY, PRINTER, BREAD STREUT AIL. 


PREFACE. 


Ir is not without considerable diffidence that I publish 
to the world the result of my critical labours on the 
prophet Isaiah. The pre-eminent position which Bishop 
Lowth has occupied for more than half a century in this 
department of sacred literature, may by some be thought 
sufficient to justify the charge of presumption against any 
attempt to improve upon the elegant production of his 
superior mind. Yet, who that has examined the serious 
discrepancies which exist between the renderings of his 
translation and those of our common version, or that 
adverts to the opinion, which has been delivered by the 
best judges, that these discrepancies are principally to be 
ascribed to the fondness for conjectural emendation in which 
the learned prelate so freely indulged, but must admit, that 
the study of the subject cannot justly be regarded as 
foreclosed, and that further efforts are required to satisfy 
the claims of a numerous class of readers, on whose minds 
it must press with no ordinary degree of interest. 

That labours of this kind are still wanted is also apparent 
from the new impulse which has been given to the study 
of Scripture criticism and interpretation; the advances 
recently made im Oriental literature generally, and. parti- 
cularly in the scientific treatment of Hebrew philology ; 
and the multiplied sources of illustration which have been 
supplied by books of ‘Travel, describing the geography, 
manners, customs, &c., of the regions contiguous to, or 


, 


1V PREFACE. 


forming the scenes of the transactions and objects to which 
allusions are made in the Bible. 

While, in this country, our prophet has been compara- 
tively neglected, the critics of Germany have subjected his 
book to rigid processes of philological and exegetical in- 
vestigation. ‘The ‘Scholia’ of the younger Rosenmiiler, 
and the Commentaries of Gesenius, Hitzig, and Hendewerk, 
though lamentably abounding with imfidel sentiments, far 
surpass any thing of the kind hitherto published, viewed 
as works of pure criticism, and sources of materials for 
successful interpretation. This remark applies particularly 
to the two first:—to Rosenmiiller, on account of the 
copiousness with which he exhibits the views of ancient 
and modern writers, and the acumen which he generally 
displays in arriving at his conclusions; and to Gesenius, 
on account of his accurate knowledge of the etymological 
and syntactical niceties of the Hebrew language, his judi- 
cious use of the cognate dialects, his profound historical 
and geographical research, and his careful investigation of 
the difficulties which lay in his path. 

Not finding that any attempt was likely soon to be made 
to supply a desideratum painfully felt to exist m our theo- 
logical literature, I was mduced to undertake the present 
work." Having, during a period of thirty years, endeavoured 


τ It was not till after the greater part of this work had been carried through 
the press that the Commentary of the Rev. Albert Barnes made its appear- 
ance in America. Such readers, however, as may compare the two will find 
that they occupy altogether independent ground. [I would, in this Second 
Edition, recommend to the attention of my readers the Commentary of Dr. 
J. A. Alexander, Professor in Princeton College, New Jersey, as a work of 
very superior merit, although containing very free strictures on the views 
advocated in the present volume relating to the future restoration of the Jews 
to Palestine,—views, however, which my continued studies of the prophetic 
record have not induced me to retract.] 


PREFACE. Vv 


to render myself familar with the language in which Isaiah 
wrote, and with the kindred dialects, whence so much help 
is to be derived; having perused the principal Biblical 
and Oriental productions which have appeared both in this 
country and on the Continent; and having for some time 
past more largely taken up Scripture exegesis as part of 
my official duty, I trust I shall not be deemed obtrusive 
in thus offering my contributions on the altar of sacred 
truth. 

In executing the task which I prescribed for myself, it 
has been my aim to fix the reading of the text; to clear 
up philological and other difficulties; to mark the pecu- 
liarities of the style; to trace the logical connexion ; to 
catch the spirit, and ascertain the meaning of the prophet ; 
and, as far as possible, to express that meaning in language 
true to the original, yet not ungrateful to an English ear. 

With the view of more clearly exhibiting the elevated 
character of the composition, and especially the paral- 
lelisms, which so materially assist im determining the sense, 
I have adopted the more approved method of throwing the 
translation into a poetic or rhythmical form. In doing 
this, I have been regulated chiefly by the divisions marked 
out by the Hebrew accents, which will, on the whole, be 
found to be correct. 

Some may be disappointed on finding that I have not 
combined doctrinal and practical observations with my 
exegesis ; but the union of the two I perceived, from the 
first, would be incompatible with the limits within which 
I should be obliged to confine my labours. Nor could 
I discover any pressing necessity for their introduction. 
There is no lack of commentaries adapted for general 
edification ; while it must be allowed we are still greatly 


vi PREFACE. 


deficient im such works as have for their definite object 
the eliciting of “the mind of the Spirit,” upon which all 
genuine Christian edification must be based. Besides, the 
intermixture of spiritual matter with critical and philo- 
logical questions, must have appeared nearly as much out 
of place, as it would be to interlard a work of general 
exposition with such topics. The departments are quite 
distinct, and ought to be separately occupied. 

I must apologize to the Oriental scholar for having printed 
the Arabic without points :—a course which I was under the 
necessity of pursuing, in order to prevent the awkward 
appearance which the greater increase of space between the 
lines must have produced, had they been inserted. It may 
also be proper to state, that the references to passages in the 
Old Testament are made according to the numeration in 
the Hebrew Bible, when the original is in question; when 
the sentiment only is involved, our own version has been 
followed ; in some few cases, both are cited. 

On one point, it is necessary specially to bespeak the in- 
dulgent consideration of my readers,—the position which 1 
have taken respecting the future restoration of the Jews to 
Palestine. That such a restoration is taught im Scripture, I 
had been accustomed to regard as more than questionable, 
how firmly soever I believed in their future conversion to the 
faith of Jesus. On examining, however, the different pro- 
phecies of the Old Testament, which treat of a return of 
that people, I have had the conviction forced upon my mind, 
that while the greater number decidedly apply to the restora- 
tion which took place on the capture of Babylon by Cyrus, 
there are others which cannot, without violence, be thus 
applied; but which, being, upon any just principle of inter- 
pretation, equally incapable of application to the affairs of the 


PREFACE. vil 


Gentile Church, must be referred to events yet future in 
Jewish history. In this class I particularly include the last 
seven chapters of Isaiah, which immediately follow the re- 
- markable prediction respecting the future conversion of the 
Jews, at the close of the fifty-ninth. Not the most distant 
allusion is made throughout these chapters to any circum- 
stances connected with the deliverance from Babylon; while, 
on the other hand, they contain a distinct recognition: of 
various things belonging to the New Dispensation,—such as 
the Divine Mission of the Messiah, the abolition of the 
Jewish worship, the calling of the Gentiles, the rejection of 
the Jews, and certain features of their present dispersion. 
At the same time, there is such a marked distinction uni- 
formly kept up between the persons spoken of and_ the 
Gentiles; such an appropriation to their condition of lan- 
guage elsewhere only used of the natural posterity of Abra- 
ham; such an obvious description of the desolation of 
Palestine ; and such express mention of a restored land, 
mountains, vineyards, fields, houses, flocks, &c. which cannot 
be figuratively understood, that; with no hermeneutical pro- 
priety, can the scene be placed in the Gentile world, or 
regarded as exhibiting the state of Gentile Christianity. 

That the Jews shall cease to exist as a distinct race on 
their incorporation into the Christian Church, the Bible no- 
where teaches ; nor is such an event probable in the nature 
of things. But, if they shall exist as believing Jews, on 
what principle can it be maintained that they may not live in 
Palestine, just as believing Britons do in Britain, believing 
Americans in America, &c.? Christianity does not destroy 
nationality, nor require an amalgamation of the different 
races of mankind, however it may insist that, in a spiritual 
point of view, all its subjects constitute but one nation and 


vill PREFACE. 


one people, holy and peculiar—the sons and daughters of the 
Lord God Almighty. If the Jews had received the Messiah, 
when preached to them by the Apostles, there is no reason to 
suppose that they would have been expelled from their own 
land; so that whatever admissions of Gentiles there might 
have been into their community, it would still, nm the main, 
have been made up of Jews, as in fact “the churches of 
God ” were, ‘“ which in Judea were in Christ Jesus.” 

Nor is there any thing, in what I conceive to be the doctrine 
of Scripture on this subject, at all at variance with its repre: 
sentations respecting the spiritual nature of the kingdom of 
Christ. The Jews, when converted, will be required to con- 
form in every point to the laws of that kingdom, precisely as 
the Gentiles are on their becoming subject to its Head and 
Lord. Not the slightest hint is given that any forms of eccle- 
siastical polity, or any modes of worship, will obtain among 
the restored Jewish converts, different from those instituted 
by the Apostles. 

As to the degree of temporal prosperity promised to them, 
it appears to have special respect to the long-continued cir- 
cumstances of adversity in which they have lived; and may 
perhaps, after all, differ but little from that which will be 
enjoyed by the members of the Dive kingdom generally, 
during the happy period of the Millennium. 


ἜΝ On finding that a Second Kdition of this Commentary was in request, I havé 
subjected it to careful revision. The work, as a whole, remains substantially 
the same, though it contains a few additions derived from more modern research, 
and such slight alterations as I have deemed absolutely needful. 


INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. 


SECTION I. 


OF THE LIFE AND TIMES OF ISAIAH. 


Noruine is known with historical certainty respecting the pro- 
phet Isaiah, beyond what is furnished by his own book, and a few 
scattered notices in the books of Kings and Chronicles. 

His name, "7%, YESHAIAHU, signifies “The Salvation of Jeho- 
vah,” being compounded of 7%, deliverance or salvation, and ὙΠ, an 
apocopated form of 7. That this name perfectly accords with 
the leading themes of his book cannot be doubted; but whether it 
was given him by Divine direction, on the foreknowledge of the 
fact that he was to be employed in propounding such themes, it 15 
impossible to determine. 

The only positive information which we possess respecting his 
descent is, that he was the son of Amoz, (Heb. ¥8)—a person 
whom some of the Fathers, from their ignorance of Hebrew, con- 
founded with Amos, (Heb. ™¥,) the prophet who flourished in the 
reign of Jeroboam 11. Many of the Jews likewise ascribe to him 
a prophetical pedigree, but merely on the gratuitous assumption, 
that in all cases in which the father of a prophet is mentioned by 
name, he must have filled the same office. Others have attempted 
to vindicate to him a royal parentage, maintaining that Amoz was 
brother to King Amaziah; but rabbinical tradition is all they can 
allege in support of their position. That he was a native of Judah, 
there can be little doubt; and, that he resided at Jerusalem is evi- 
dent from chap. vii. 3, vill. 2, xxii. 15, xxxvii. 2, 5, 21, ἄκουα but 
whether he lived in the middle or lower division of the city, is not 

: b 


x INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. 


so certain, though some have gathered as much from the textual 
reading of 2 Kings xx. 4. No circumstances of a domestic charac- 
ter are mentioned, excepting that he was married, and that he had 
two sons in the reign of Ahaz, to both of whom were given names 
symbolical of important events in the Jewish history. The opinion 
that he was twice married has merely been advanced in order to 
give something like plausibility to a false interpretation of chap. 
vu. 14. 

Though it is extremely probable that he was first solemnly called 
to the public discharge of his prophetical functions in the last year 
of Uzziah, 7.e. B.c. 759, yet there is reason to conclude that he 
had been occupied with public affairs long before: it being ex- 
pressly stated 2 Chron. xxvi. 22, that he composed the complete 
memoirs of that prince. At all events, he must have reached some 
maturity of age by that time; and if, as is exceedingly probable, 
he lived some time during the reign of Manasseh, it will follow, 
that he filled the prophetical office during a period of about fifty 
years, and must have been about eighty at the time of his death. 
According to a very ancient Jewish tradition, he was sawn in two 
by order of Manasseh, whom he had boldly reproved for his wicked- 
ness.' To this the Apostle is supposed to allude, Heb. xi. 37. 

As the exact position of our prophet, and the peculiar circum- 
stances of the times in which he flourished, must necessarily either 
have called forth, or given a distinctive colouring to the predictions 
which he was commissioned to deliver, it is manifest, that an accu- 
rate knowledge of his times is indispensable to a right interpretation 
of his book. Now it so happens, that not only does a considerable 
portion of the book itself abound with historical statements and 
allusions, but full and circumstantial accounts of the principal 
events which transpired in his days, and the relations of the sur- 
rounding nations to the Jews, and to each other, are found in 
several books of the Old Testament which treat of that period. 

Two hundred and forty years before Isaiah entered upon his 
prophetical office, the revolt under Rehoboam took place, by which 


1 Gemara Jebam. iv. 13; Sanhed. fol. 103; Just. Mart. Dial. cum Tryph. 
p. 349; Origen in Ps. xxxvii; Tertullian de Patientia; Jerome in Isa. lvii; 
Augustine, Civ. Dei. xviii. 24; Chronicon Pasch. p. 155. See also Ascensio Jesaiz 
Vatis, published by Dr. Lawrence in Ethiopic and Latin, Oxford, 1819, the 
areek original of which is quoted by Epiphanius de Heres. xl. 2. 


INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. ΧΙ 


the Hebrew kingdom was divided into two separate states, which 
not only made war on each other, but were subject to harassing in- 
vasions by foreign enemies. During the first eighty years of this 
period, the kingdom of Judah greatly prospered, especially under 
the pious kings, Asa and Jehoshaphat; but the idolatries which they 
had succeeded in suppressing having been revived, Jehovah visited 
it with heavy calamities; and, in the last days of Amaziah it lay 
prostrate at the feet of Jehoash, king of Israel. 

Though only sixteen years of age when raised to the throne, 
Uzziah soon discovered a spirit of energy and enterprise; not only 
restoring the administration of public affairs from the state to which 
it had been reduced, and promoting the agricultural interests of the 
country, but organizing an immense army, fortifying the principal 
cities, and carrying his victorious arms into the territories of the 
Philistines, the Ammonites, and the Arabs. He also took the 
Port of Elath on the eastern gulf of the Red Sea, and thus re- 
opened the lucrative maritime trade of the East. Though, on the 
whole, obedient to the Divine laws, yet this monarch suffered the 
idolatrous altars to remain, and was ultimately smitten with leprosy 
for presuming to invade the sacred office of the priesthood. 

Although temporal prosperity appears to have continued during 
the reign of Jotham, yet, owing to the increase of luxury and 
sensual indulgence, true piety greatly declined; and the alliance 
was formed between Pekah, king of Israel, and Rezin, king of 
Syria, which was brought to bear against the kingdom the year 
after his death, which took place B.c. 743. He was succeeded by 
Ahaz, the most abandoned monarch that had yet ascended the 
Jewish throne. During his reign every thing was thrown into con- 
fusion; the law of God was violated in the most reckless manner ; 
superstition and idolatry were openly practised; a Syrian altar and 
Syrian gods were introduced; and the temple was not only greatly 
defaced, but at last entirely closed against the worship of the true 
God.? Having been repulsed with great loss by the confederate 
powers of Israel and Syria, and suffering from the Edomites and 
the Philistines, Ahaz applied to Tiglath-pileser, king of Assyria, 
for assistance, for which he paid him a subsidy, raised from the 
treasures of the temple, the nobility, and the royal palace. It 


1 2 Kings xv. 1—7; 2 Chron. xxvi. 
2 Isa. 11. 6—8; 2 Kings xv. 32—88, xvi. 1—4; 2 Chron. xxvii. xxviil. 


xi INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. 


would appear, however, that, though the Assyrian monarch pos- 
sessed himself of Damascus and some of the cities belonging to 
Israel, the inhabitants of which he carried into exile, he afforded 
no real succour to Ahaz, but, on the contrary, greatly harassed and 
perplexed him as his tributary.’ 

On the death of Ahaz, B.c. 728, he was succeeded by Hezekiah, 
a pious and zealous prince, who abolished idolatry, and all the 
objects that had been perverted to its use; restored the temple 
and worship of Jehovah; improved the fortifications and water- 
works around Jerusalem; reduced the Philistines; and shook off 
the Assyrian yoke. In the fourteenth year of his reign, however, 
t.e. B.C. 714, he was menaced by Sennacherib, who was advancing 
with a large army through Judea, with a view to the conquest of 
Egypt. To avert the threatened calamity, Hezekiah paid to the 
king of Assyria the stipulated sum of three hundred talents of 
silver, and thirty talents of gold, to raise which he was obliged to 
appropriate all the treasures in the temple and the palace; but that 
monarch, deeming it unsafe to leave so strong a power in his rear, 
reduced most of the cities of Judah, and ordered a numerous body 
of his troops to invest and subdue Jerusalem. Summoned in lan- 
guage of the most insolent description to surrender, Hezekiah 
applied by earnest prayer for Divine protection and deliverance ; 
and by the miraculous destruction of the Assyrian army the city 
was relieved. On his recovery from a dangerous sickness, which 
had been pre-signified by a miraculous phenomenon, he was 
honoured with an embassy from the court of Babylon; but giving 
way to a spirit of ostentation, he received a severe rebuke in the 
announcement of the Babylonish captivity.’ 

In the succeeding reign of Manasseh, idolatry, with all its accom- 
panying evils, was publicly established, and maintained in the most 
daring and outrageous manner by that apostate king; in conse- 
quence of which, notwithstanding the penitent efforts which he 
afterwards made to regain the ground he had lost, and the zealous 
reformation effected by Josiah, the Jewish affairs continued gra- 
dually to decline, till at last, partly by internal broils, partly by the 
invasion of Pharaoh Necho, and finally by the imposition of the 
Babylonish yoke, they were reduced to the lowest possible state ; 

1 2 Kings xvi.; 2 Chron. xxviii.; 1 Chron. v. 26. i 
2 2 Kings xviiiim—xx.; 2 Chron. xxix.—xxxii; Isa, xxxvii—xxxix, 


INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. Xill 


the city of Jerusalem was destroyed; the temple burnt with fire ; 
and the principal inhabitants were carried away captive to Babylon.' 
Though Isaiah can have lived only during a very limited period of 
this last section of the history of his people, yet no inconsiderable 
portion of his predictions relate to their condition as located in the 
midst of idolaters during the captivity, and their happy restoration 
to their own land through the instrumentality of Cyrus.? 

During the space of time occupied by the ministry of the 
prophet, the Jews were more or less affected by the influence of 
foreign states, some of which were the most powerful empires of 
antiquity. In their immediate vicinity were the rival kingdom of 
Israel, the Syrian and Tyrian powers, the Philistines, Moabites, 
Edomites, and Arabians, by whose warlike demonstrations, sudden 
incursions, and victorious enterprises, they were greatly annoyed, 
and frequently brought to the verge of ruin. In the ancient 
kingdom of the Pharaohs, at this time successively under the rule 
of the nineteenth of Manetho’s dynasties, the Dodecharchy, and 
the dynasty of Psammeticus, they had a powerful neighbour, to 
the shield of whose protection they constantly looked for safety 
when threatened by the most formidable of their assailants— 
Assyria.’ This empire, the capital of which was Nineveh, was, so 
far as Jewish affairs are concerned, not the ancient power of that 
name, supposed to have been founded by Nimrod, but that founded 
on the death of Sardanapalus, by Arbaces the Mede, about the 
seventh year of Uzziah, B.c. 804. The Assyrian monarchs men- 
tioned in Scripture as having invaded Palestine, are Pul, Tiglath- 
pileser, Shalmaneser, Sargon, Sennacherib, and LEzar-haddon. 
Their sceptre was one of almost unlimited sway, being wielded 
from Persia to the Mediterranean, and from the Caspian Sea to 
the Persian Gulf. Yet, not satisfied with this extensive empire, 
Sargon and Sennacherib projected the conquest of Egypt, the 
mighty expedition undertaken with a view to effect which occupies 
a conspicuous place on the pages of our prophet, both on account 
of its threatening aspect, and the Divine interposition by which it 
was terminated. The Chaldean power in Babylon, by which, in 
conjunction with the Medes, the Assyrian empire was overthrown, 
now began to raise its head, and for a time exerted a mighty 

1 9 Kings xxi. 1—18, xxii—xxv.; 2 Chron. xxxiii. 1—10, xxxiii—xxxvi. 
? Chapters xl—lii. 12, 3 Isa, xxx, 1—17, xxxk 


ΧΙΥ INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. 


influence over the countries of hither Asia, and, among the rest, 
on Judea. To this empire, however, and to that of Persia, by 
“which, in its turn, it was subverted, no purely historical reference 
is made by Isaiah, excepting in chap. xxiii. 13. In like manner, 
Rome, which was founded in his days, is only recognized in the 
way of prophetical anticipation, in so far as her history was to have 
a bearing on the church of God; and is presented to our view 
under the indefinite and general names of “‘ The West,” and “ The 
Maritime Lands” in that direction. From the mount of inspired 
vision the prophet surveys the surrounding nations; and, like a 
faithful watchman, gives warning of each, describes some of their 
more striking characteristics, and predicts their final destruction. 

Contemporaneously with Isaiah flourished the prophets Hosea, 
and Micah, between which last and him there are some remarkable 
points of resemblance. 


SECTION II. 
OF THE AUTHENTICITY AND INTEGRITY OF THE TEXT. 


WHEN we speak of the integrity of any writing, we understand 
by the term an immunity from corruption, whether consisting in 
the removal from the text of any thing which it originally con- 
tained, or the introduction of matter into it by a foreign hand. 
That an absolute literal identity exists between the present copies 
of the Bible and the autographs whence they have mediately been 
derived, will not be maintained by any who are at all acquainted 
with the history of literature generally, or with that of sacred 
literature in particular. The existence of various readings is 
matter of ocular demonstration. Its prevention could only have 
been effected by a continued series of miraculous interventions, 
which God hath not been pleased to employ. He hath committed 
to fallible and erring men the custody and transmission of the 
sacred oracles. 

Against the supposition, however, that they have been wilfully 
corrupted, or that their integrity has been in any way materially 
affected by the errors of transcription, there exist the strongest 


INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. XV 


possible reasons. The sacredness of their claims; the scrupulous 
regard which has ever been paid to them by those in whose hands 
they have been deposited; their having been a common public 
property, and not the monopoly of a privileged caste, or of any 
influential individual; the check which one copy and one portion 
has had upon another; their constant use in the church of God; 
together with the absence of any adequate motive ;—all go satis- 
factorily to shew the improbability of attempts having been made 
to alter them, and the impossibility that any such attempts, sup- 
posing them to have been made, would escape detection and 
merited reprobation. With respect to the Hebrew Scriptures 
especially, nothing is more susceptible of demonstration than the 
fact, that those entrusted with the care of them have in all ages 
regarded them with sacred, and even with superstitious veneration, 
and have watched over their purity with the utmost vigilance.* 
They have regarded them not only as their national charter, but as 
the foundation of their religious belief, and the source of their 
religious hopes. They have received them as the productions of 
men who were the subjects of a supernatural Divine influence, 
specially exerted upon them for the purpose of enabling them 
correctly to register the communications of the will of God, and 
those events the knowledge of which was calculated to be useful 
to posterity. These men were not obscure and unknown indi- 
viduals, but public and official characters, whose credentials had 
been tested and approved as genuine by the community in which 
they lived, as well as by those more immediately called upon to 
judge of such matters. No book was received into the Jewish 
canon that could not be proved to have been written or sanctioned 
by one who was accredited as a Divine messenger; and after the 
canon was completed, no one dared to add to or detract from its 
sacred contents.” To suppose, under such circumstances, the 
existence of deliberate or fraudulent corruptions, would be to 
advance a position utterly at variance with historical fact. 

It is matter of notoriety that, although the authenticity and 
integrity of the prophecies of Isaiah have, in all past ages since 


1 For an account of the rigidity of the laws by which Jewish copyists are 
tied down in performing their task, see my Biblical Researches and Travels in 
Russia, pp. 208—211. 

ἢ See my Lectures on Divine Inspiration, Lect, ix. 


Xvi INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. 


the period of their composition, been above suspicion,—the book 
having been firmly believed both by Jews and Christians to be his 
throughout,—they have of late years been assailed by certain critics 
in Germany, who have expended upon the discussion of the 
subject all that their powers of invention, and their stores of 
philological and critical learning could supply. It is, however, not 
a little remarkable that these attacks obviously sprang out of, and 
have, for the most part, been conducted in the spirit of those 
investigations respecting the authenticity of the works of Homer, 
Cicero, and other authors of classic celebrity which were carried on 
by Wolf, Heyne, Ilgen, and other distinguished literati of the 
day. It having become fashionable to break up the writings of an 
ancient author into distinct parts, and to dwell upon the differences 
in point of style, &c. which appeared to exist between one part 
and another, the same process was resorted to in the treatment of 
the Sacred Authors, more especially in that of Isaiah, whose book, 
being of greater extent, and comprising a greater variety of 
subjects than that of any other prophet, afforded more enlarged 
scope for the exercise of critical acumen. ΤῸ this must be added 
the sceptical spirit originally generated by Spinoza, and afterwards 
propagated by our English deists, the influence of which has been 
extensively felt on the Continent, and nowhere more powerfully 
than in the land of the Reformation. 

Doubts respecting the authenticity of certain parts of the book 
of Isaiah were first started by Koppe and Déderlein; the former of 
whom was the translator of Lowth into German, with additional 
Notes and Observations; and the latter, the author of a New Trans- 
lation of the prophet, with brief Motdscs in Latin, The subject has 
since been tale up and discussed by Justi, Eichhorn, Rosen- 
miiller, Paulus, Bauer, Bertholdt, De Wette, Gesenius, Hitzig, and 
Hendewerk ; and not only have chapters xl.—lxvi. been abstracted 
from our prophet, and ascribed to some writer supposed to have 
flourished about the time of the return from Babylon, to whom, 
for the sake of distinction, have been given the names of “ Doniato: 
Isaiah” and “ Pseudo-Isaiah,” but the following portions of the 
book have likewise been attributed to the same, or to some other 
author: chap. 11. 2—4, xi. xi, xii. 1—xiv. 23, xv. xvi. xix. 
18—25, xxi. xxil. 1—14, xxiii. xxiv.—xxvii. xxxiv. 

These writers insist that the state of things set forth in these 


INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. XVil 


portions is described in the style of history, not of prophecy ; that 
no distinet intimations of the captivity are previously furnished ; 
that the statements contained in them would have been unintelli- 
gible to the contemporaries of Isaiah; that, as predictions, the details 
would be too circumstantial; that no appeals are made to them by 
Jeremiah ; and that the style is not identical with that employed 
in the rest of the book. To attempt a formal or elaborate refuta- 
tion of these several objections would be actwm agere. They have 
been more or less fully met by Piper,’ Uhland,’ Beckhaus,’® van der 
Palm,‘ Dereser,’ Greve,’ Moller,’ Arndt,’ Jahn,’ Kleinert,!° Heng- 
stenberg,'’ Professor Lee,’? and Dr. J. Pye Smith,’* who have 
shewn, that they have totally failed in establishing the hypotheses 
in support of which they have been brought forward. I shall, 
therefore, confine what observations I have to make to some of the 
leading points in the controversy, and refer such of my readers 
as may wish to pursue the subject farther, to the writers just 
specified. 

It must be obvious to all who peruse the antagonist articles, that 
the πρώτον ψεῦδος to which they are chiefly to be ascribed, is a 
total disbelief of prophetic inspiration. In most of them this is 
distinctly avowed; and the different positions that have been 
presented in the form of argument, are merely taken, in order, if 


' Integritas Iesaize, a recentiorum conatibus vindicata. Gryphsw. 1792. 4to. 

2 Vaticinium Iesaiz, cap. xiii. Tub. 1798. 4to. 

3 Ueber die Integritat der Proph. Schriften des. A. B. Halle, 1798. 

4 Jesaia vertaald en opgehelderd. Amsterd. 1805. 3 Deel. 8vo. 

5 In Brentano’s Bibelwerk. Frankf. 1808. 

6 Vaticiniorum Iesaiz pars continens Carminaa cap. xl. usque adlvi.9. Am- 
stelod. 1810. 4to. 

7 De Authentia oraculorum Esai, cap. xl—Ixvi. Haynie, 1825. 4to. 

8 De loco, qui extat apud Iesaiam, cap. xxiv.—xxvii., vindicando et explicando 
‘ccommentatio. Hamb. 1826. 4to. J 

9 In his Einleitung, Th. 11. 2 Abtheil. pp. 458—494; and in Horne’s Introd. 
vol. iv. pp. 165—175. 

0 Kleinert tber die Echtheit sammtlicher in dem Buche Iesaia enthaltenen 
Weissagungen. Berlin, 1829. 8vo. 

1 Christologie des Alten Testaments, &c. Berlin, 1829—1835. I Th. 2 Ab- 
theil. pp. 168—206. American Translation by Dr. Keith. Alexandria, 1836— 
1839. Vol. i. pp. 395—423. 

® Sermons and Dissertations. London, 1830, 8vo. pp. 157—208. 

18 The Principles of Interpretation as applied to the Prophecies. 2d Edit. 
London, 1831. Supplementary Note G. p. 67. 

Ὁ 


XVlli INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. 


possible, to sustain the infidel principle. According to Eichhorn,’ the 
prophets were men gifted with extraordinary intellectual powers, 
and rich in the experience of human affairs, by which they were 
raised far above their contemporaries, and enabled to extend their 
penetrating views into futurity. In the preface to his ‘ Commen- 
tary on Isaiah,’* Gesenius expressly avows, that he “can find no 
supernatural or definite prediction in the Hebrew prophets ;” and 
in the course of his work, whenever he is pressed by any thing in 
the shape of such prediction, he exerts his ingenuity in attempting 
to lower it down to a lucky conjecture, founded upon existing 
aspects of the political horizon, or other circumstances of the times. 
Hitzig* believes prophecy to have been nothing more than the 
effect of physical ecstasy, moral illumination, poetic inspiration, and 
a shrewd calculating on the future from present events and circum- 
stances. And Hendewerk,* the latest writer on the book, agrees 
with him in the main, investing the prophets with “a poetical 
spirit of divination,” which he thinks is sufficient to account for the 
foresayings contained in their writings. Ἢ 

In diametrical opposition to all such statements of speculative 
critics stands the inspired testimony of the Apostle Peter:* ‘“ PRo- 
PHECY CAME NOT IN OLD TIME BY THE WILL OF MAN, BUT HOLY 
MEN OF GOD SPAKE AS THEY WERE MOVED BY THE HOLy GHost.” 
It is impossible for words more strongly to deny the origination of 
the predictions of the Hebrew seers in the simple operation of their 
mental faculties, or more positively to vindicate for it that super- 
natural influence by which the Spirit of God revealed to them 
things to come. They merely gave utterance to what they were 
borne onward by a Divine impulse to announce. And the same 
Apostle distinctly recognizes such influence as enabling the pro- 
phets to predict the distant sufferigs and glory of the Messiah: 
“Searching what, or what manner of time THE SPIRIT OF CHRIST 
WHICH WAS IN THEM DID SIGNIFY, WHEN IT TESTIFIED BEFORE- 
HAND the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow.” ° 
Our Lord himself likewise declares, that “the prophets” had 
““ WRITTEN concerning ” him’—a declaration which most especially 


1 Einleitung in das A. Τὶ, Band. iv. καὶ 39. 2 P. πεν: 

% Der Prophet Iesaja. Heidelb. 1833. 8vo. Pref. xxv. pp. 463, 464. 

* Des Propheten lesaja Weissagungen. Kéonigsb. 1838. 8vo. Einleitung. 
5 2d Epist. 1. 21. 6 ] Epist. i. 11. 7 Luke xxiv. 44. 


INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. x1x 


applies to Isaiah, whose writings, according to the same Divine 
authority, contain express prophecies of Him and his kingdom. 

But, if these holy men were the subjects of an influence exerted 
upon their minds by the Omniscient Spirit, to whose eye the whole 
of the future, in the most minute of its existences and modifica- 
tions, was equally present with the entire range of then existent 
being, what incongruity is there in believing, that the passages in 
our prophet which contain detailed descriptions of events that were 
to transpire in the history of the Jewish nation long after his time, 
actually proceeded from his pen? What greater impediment can 
there be in the way of exercising such belief, than in believing that 
he “saw the glory of Christ and spake of him?”’? So long as we 
confine our ideas of prophecy within the sphere of purely human 
activity, we must necessarily deny, as contrary to all experience, 
the ability to descry and predict contingent future events,—such as 
those described in the disputed portions of Isaiah must have been 
to him and all who lived in his time; but no sooner do we candidly 
yield our minds to the authoritative claims of the Scripture doc- 
trine of prophetic inspiration, than the absurdity vanishes, and all is 
plain, consistent with itself, and, in every respect, worthy of God.’ 
It then becomes manifest, that, to announce the conquest of 
Babylon, and the consequent deliverance of the captive Jews by 
Cyrus, at a period when the Assyrian power was yet dominant, 
when the Babylonian state was only in its germ, and the Median 
empire had no existence; to foretell the destruction of Tyre by 
Nebuchadnezzar one hundred and fifty years prior to the event ; 
to point out the birth, character, sufferings, death, resurrection, and 
glorious reign of our Saviour, with the utmost minuteness, seven 
centuries beforehand; and to describe events which are still future 
in the history of the Jewish people, were all equally possible and 
equally easy. In every case the prophet spoke as the Spirit gave 
him utterance. 

It deserves special notice, that in the very portion of the book 
which has been most violently attacked, there occur passages in 
which the Divine origin of prophecy is the subject of direct and 
unanswerable appeal. or instance : 


1 John xii. 41. 
3. See my Lectures, wf sup. pp. 253, 254, 315—319, 


ΧΧ INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. 


‘Who published this of OLD? 
Who declared it FROM ANCIENT TIMES ? 
Was it not I, Jehovah ὁ" 
And again :— 
“1 am God, and there is none like me, 
Declaring the end FROM THE BEGINNING, 
From ANCIENT TIMES things not yet done.”’ * 


With which may be compared the appeal made in the book of 
Ezekiel: * “Thus saith the Lord God, Art thou he of whom I 
have spoken OF OLD TIME by my servants the prophets of Israel, 
which prophesied in those days many years that I would bring thee 
against them ?” 

That the predictions respecting the Baga state of Judea, and 
the return from the captivity, should be couched in language 
descriptive of the present, or rather of the past, is perfectly in 
accordance with the animated picturesque character of the pro- 
phetic style. So vividly were the circumstances exhibited to the 
view of Isaiah in prophetic vision, and so powerful was the im- 
pression produced upon his mind, that no language which did not 
invest them with present reality, could give adequate expression to 
his feelings. The scenes are thus brought out more boldly, and 
placed in a much stronger light before our eyes. They strike us 
more forcibly than they could have done had they been depicted in 
the simple language of the future. This feature of the more 
animated prophetic style was not unobserved by the Fathers: 
Both Justin Martyr,* and Eusebius,’ distinctly recognize it. And 
in later times its existence has justly been regarded by most as a 
settled point in the interpretation of the prophecies.® It is, indeed, 
no unusual thing for the other prophets as well as Isaiah to take 
their position in the future, and then describe events as actually 
happening in their presence, or as possessing all the certainty of 


1 Chap. xlv. 21. 2 Chap. xlvi. 10. 3 Chap. xxxviii. 17. 

4 Ὅταν δὲ προφητικὸν πνεῦμα τὰ μέλλοντα γίνεσθαι ὡς ἤδη γενόμενα λέγῃ» ὡς 
καὶ ἐν τοῖς προειρημένοις δοξάσαι ἔστιν. Apol. p. 81. 

ἢ Κατά τινα δὲ συνήθειαν προφητικὴν, τὸ μέλλον ὁ προφήτης ὡς παρῴχηκος 
ἀναφωνεῖ, καὶ ὡς περὶ ἑαυτοῦ τοῦ προφετεύοντος δηλοῖ. Demonst. Evangel. 
lib. iv. cap. 30. 

5 Clericus ad Deut. xxx1i, 80, 


INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. XXi 


~ 


past transactions. The circumstances, that our prophet assumes 
this position, and that the design of his predictions relative to the 
captivity being to promote the recovery of his people from idolatry 
and other sins, and to encourage them by repeated announcements 
of their deliverance, and of still more important deliverances future 
to their return, sufficiently account for the absence of definite 
denunciations of that calamity as the subject of future infliction. 
He takes it for granted as sufficiently known, from his own positive 
prophecy of it, chap. xxxix. 5—7, and from the predictions of 
other prophets. 

From the whole structure of chapters x1—lxvi. it would appear, 
that they formed no part of the instructions publicly delivered by 
the prophet in the course of his personal ministry, and were, 
therefore, not so much designed for the use of those who lived in 
his own day, as to be preserved for the benefit of those who should 
live in aftertimes. They were, in all probability, composed in the 
reign of Manasseh, when he was under the necessity of laying 
aside his prophetic trumpet, and restricting his service to the use 
of the pen. At the same time, there can be little doubt that 
copies of these inspired compositions would be eagerly sought after 
by those in whose minds there still reigned a supreme regard for 
the God of Israel, and whose tenderest sympathies were called 
into exercise by the present and prospective condition of their 
nation. And whatever obscurity might have attached to their 
contents, by which such as perused them would be prevented from 
obtaining that full and clear insight into their meaning which was 
to be the privilege of those who should live in succeeding ages, yet 
they could not but discover much in their general bearing, and also 
in many of their particular announcements, to inspire them with 
the brightest hopes, excite them to persevering confidence in 
Jehovah, and instruct them to walk and worship so as to please 
him. Though, like other prophetic Scripture, they might be 
unintelligible to the wicked, yet such as were endowed with spiritual 
wisdom, would derive from them rich practical information.' 

As it regards the objection taken to the circumstantiality with 
which many things are described by the prophet, it may only 
be necessary to remark, that it will lie against other prophecies 


1 Dan, xi1..9,, 10. 


XX INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. 


equally as against those in question. With what particularity, for 
instance, do Jeremiah and Ezekiel describe the countries and cities 
on which Divine judgments were to be inflicted, and specify by 
name the instruments by whom their destruction was to be 
effected! With what minuteness of detail does Daniel set forth 
the time of the Messiah’s appearance; the manner and nature of 
his death; and the fates of the great monarchies with which those 
of the church of God were, to a certain extent, to be mixed up! 
Does not Micah specify the birth-place of the Saviour? and 
Zechariah his humble entrance, as a spiritual king, into Jeru- 
salem? And as to the express mention of Cyrus by name, have 
we not a parallel in the designation of Josiah upwards of three 
centuries before he was born ?1 

Were it necessary to enter into the Mlulévteal part of the 
question, it might easily be shewn, that the arguments employed 
on this ground against the authenticity of the disputed passages are 
of the slenderest possible character; and that, were any degree of 
validity to be allowed them, they would not only go to cancel large 
portions of every book in the Bible, but to bastardize important 
sections in the most celebrated human productions. Let any one 
apply the same critical pruning knife to Shakespeare, or Walter 
Scott, or Milton, or Hume, and he may produce equally satis- 
factory proofs of the spuriousness of much that has been ascribed 
to these writers. Though with respect to general style and 
phraseology there is a striking conformity running throughout 
our prophet, yet because he employs a few terms and modes of 
expression in one part of his book, which are not found in the 
other, it is seriously argued, that he could not have written 
it all! 

On the whole, it must be concluded, not only that the denial of 
original authorship as it respects these chapters rests upon no 
external evidence whatever, and upon none internal beyond what 
is brought out by the ingenuity of speculation, but that the entire 
stream of external evidence is directly and broadly against it, 
while there is no lack of internal characteristics which go to identify 
the writer with Isaiah. 


11 Kings xiii. 2. 


INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. XXill 


It is now time to inquire what judgment we are to entertain 
respecting the text in its more minute forms, or the degree of 
immunity from verbal errors which may justly be claimed for it. 
If we are to receive without qualification the assertion of Bishop 
Lowth,’ in reference to the Hebrew Text in general, “ that 
mistakes are frequent, and of various kinds; of letters, words, and 
sentences; by variation, omission, transposition; such as often 
injure the beauty and elegance, embarrass the construction, alter 
or obscure the sense, and sometimes render it quite unintelligible ;” 
or that which he has advanced respecting the text of Isaiah in 
particular, that “it is considerably injured, and stands in need of 
frequent emendation,”* then it is manifest it must require no 
small effort to recover it from the corruptions to which it has 
been subject. In accordance with such views of the case, the 
learned prelate proceeded fearlessly to adopt those measures which 
he deemed necessary for effecting such recovery. All who are 
conversant with his notes must be aware, that a considerable 
portion of them is occupied with attempts to emend the text, 
partly with the aid of MSS. and of the Ancient Versions, and 
partly by conjecture; the result of which has been, that not only 
has the original text become in a great measure unsettled, but 
occasion has been taken by other critics, inferior in taste, though 
not in boldness, as Blayney, Newcome, Horsley, and Boothroyd, 
to deal in the same way with other sacred writers, to the no 
small disparagement of their integrity. If the bishop had confined 
himself to the collation of MSS., and a rigid examination of the 
renderings in the Ancient Versions; and, after carefully weighing 
the evidence which they furnished in favour or otherwise of any 
particular reading, and minutely investigating the Hebrew usage 
and that of the cognate dialects, had presented us with the result 
of his labours, they would doubtless have merited the unqualified 
approval of every competent judge: but, indulging as he has done, 
after the example of Houbigant, in unnecessary and groundless 
conjectures, partly original, and partly adopted from that author, 
and from Drs. Secker, Durell, and Jubb, and altering the text 
agreeably to such conjectures, he has laid himself open to the just 
censure of all sober and judicious critics. His rash and unwar- 


? Prelim, Dissert. p. lxiv. 2 Tbid. p. Ixiv. 


XXIV INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. 


ranted emendations were, indeed, speedily exposed by Professor 
D. Kocher, a learned Swiss divine,! who, though he did not treat 
the bishop with that urbanity to which he was otherwise entitled, 
and carried his notions of the literal perfection of the Hebrew text 
to an unjustifiable length, certainly did succeed in convincing the 
learned that our prophet deserved a very different treatment from 
that to which he had been so unceremoniously subjected. Since 
that time, whatever commendations have been passed upon Lowth 
for his fine poetic taste, his classical elegance, and his merits as a 
writer on Hebrew poetry, and these have not been few, there is 
but one opinion among Continental critics in reference to his 
emendatorial conjectures. Gesenius has demonstrated, that they 
are, in most instances, altogether uncalled for; in others, without 
any solid foundation ; and that, had the bishop been more familiar 
with the comparative philology of the Hebrew text, and the 
Oriental dialects, and more deeply versed in the minutiz of the 
Hebrew syntax, he would have been under no temptation to 
tax his ingenuity, or to have recourse to the desperate remedy 
which he has so freely applied in the exercise of therapeutic 
criticism. 

In the following commentary, I have suffered no instance to 
pass unnoticed, in which I have judged that unwarrantable 
liberties have been taken with the text, though I have not always 
deemed it necessary to mention thei authors. It has, I trust, 
been made apparent to the satisfaction of the reader, that it is by 
no means in that corrupt state in which it has been represented ; 
and that, carefully and accurately examined by all the lights which 
the present improved state of Oriental philology and Biblical 
criticism supplies, it justly demands our undiminished confidence 
and respect. The errors of transcription which have crept into 
it, are, in general, of little or no consequence as affecting the 
sense, and may easily be rectified by a judicious use of the various 
readings exhibited in the MSS.; by comparing the renderings 
given in the Ancient Versions; by consulting the testimonies of 
Jewish and Christian writers ; and by due attention to the context, 
and to the scope of the writer. 


1 Vindiciew 5. textus Hebreei Esais adversus Ὁ. Roberti Lowthi criticam. 
Bernx, 1786, 8vo. 


INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. 'XXKV 


SECTION III. 
OF THE STYLE. 


Tovey the prophets were the subjects of Divine Inspiration, 
there is no reason to conclude that they were bereft of the mental 
peculiarities which constituted their individuality of character, or 
that they employed any other style or manner of writing than 
what was natural to them.’ It cannot, therefore, be improper to 
inquire into these peculiarities, or to treat of the respective diction 
of each, as we should that of merely human authors, only care be 
taken to cherish due and becoming reverence of the Holy Spirit, 
to whose infallible regulation and control it was constantly subject. 

While Isaiah possesses much in common with the other prophets, 
there are many peculiar features by which his compositions are 
distinguished. In character he is energetic, bold, and uncom- 
promising ; of a lively and fertile imagination, yet full of serious 
feeling and deep thought; zealous for the honour of the Divine 
perfections, the spirituality of worship, and the purity of the 
theocracy ; the undaunted reprover of sin, of every kind, and in 
whomsoever found; the tender-hearted patriot, who took the 
deepest interest in the circumstances and prospects of his people ; 
and the compassionate friend of the Gentile world. 

His language is uniformly adapted to the subjects of which he 
treats. In narrative he exhibits the utmost simplicity and perspi- 
cuity; in announcing the divine oracles, his tones are marked by 
a singular degree of solemnity; in his descriptions, he is minute, 
discriminating, frequently cumulative, and highly graphic; in 
menacing foreign enemies, and the wicked among the Jews, he 
is full of vehemence and force. His expostulations are urgent and 
pathetic; his hortatory addresses, earnest and powerful. Nothing 
can surpass the sublimity of those passages in which the sovereignty 
and infinite majesty of Jehovah are set forth, or the severe irony 
and satire with which he attacks the worshippers of idols. Nor is 
he equalled by any of the other prophets in the magnificence, 
variety, and choice of the images which he employs, especially 


1 See my Lectures on Divine Inspiration, pp. 391—895. 


d 


ΧΧΥῚ INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. 


when predicting the reign of the Messiah, and the future happimess 
of the church. 

The poetical structure of his sentences is exquisitely graceful 
and elegant. Their flow is, in most instances, soft and pleasing: 
at times they roll onward like the majestic billows of the ocean. 
He not only abounds in the simpler or cognate parallelism of 
members, which constitutes one of the most prominent features of 
Hebrew poetry, but in the varied forms of the antithetic, 
synthetic, and introverted parallelism. Many of his sentences are 
highly artificial, and so rhythmically combined as to produce the 
happiest effect. He is fond of paronomasias, apostrophes, com- 
parisons, emphatic forms of words, and iterations of the same 
word. His images are dignified and appropriate. They are, 
likewise, greatly diversified, and very often of the boldest and 
most sublime description. Not unfrequently he proceeds with a 
rapidity which leads the reader to suppose that he intends to carry 
out the subject to a much greater length ; when, all at once, by an 
abrupt transition, he takes up a fresh subject, which he again as 
suddenly drops. ‘This is specially observable in cases in which 
there is some idea or expression in the discourse which leads his 
thoughts to the future Redeemer. Grotius compares him to 
Demosthenes, of whom, in point of time, he had the precedence 
by nearly four centuries; and by men of taste in every country, 
who have been capable of relishing his beauties, he has had 
awarded to him the highest meed of praise. 

For finished specimens of his style, the reader may consult the 
description of Jewish female dress, chap. iil. 16—24; the parable 
of the vineyard, chap. v.; the approach of the Assyrian army 
towards Jerusalem, chap. x. 28—32; the ode on the king of 
Babylon, chap. xiv.; the sentence of Egypt, chap. xix.; the 
threatening against Shebna, chap. xxii. 16—18 ; the calamities of 
Jerusalem, chap. xxiv.; the transcendent superiority of Jehovah, 
chap. xl. 12—31,; the absurdity of idol-worship, chap. xliv.; the 
corruptions prevalent among the Jews in the time of our Lord, 
chap. lix.; and their happy condition when restored in the latter 
day, chap. Ix. 


INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. XXVIli 


SECTION IV. 
OF THE PRINCIPLES OF PROPHETICAL INTERPRETATION. 


It is manifest from the widely different, and even contradictory 
interpretations which have been, and still are given of the pro- 
phetic records, that we are far from having arrived at any settled, 
solid, or satisfactory principles on which to rest their exegesis. 
Many causes might doubtless be assigned for this want of agree- 
ment, but the following, there is reason to believe, are some of the 
principal :— 

First, the want of a familiar acquaintance with the distinctive 
characteristics of prophetical language. Instead of making proper 
allowance for the highly poetical character of the tropes and figures 
with which it abounds, by which objects are frequently magnified 
or diminished beyond the reality, and carefully endeavouring to 
ascertain the exact meaning of its symbols, interpreters have too 
much treated it as if it were plain or ordinary prose composition. 
Figurative terms and phrases have been taken in their literal 
import, and applied to the objects which they primarily designate ; 
while others, which are introduced merely for the sake of embellish- 
ing the style, vividly delineating the objects, and thus heightening 
the effect, have had separate and important meanings attached to 
them, as if each had been designed to convey a distinct portion of 
prophetical truth. All conceivable aspects of a particular image 
have been brought out, and invested with a corresponding circum- 
stantial detail of meaning in their supposed bearing upon the 
subject of the prophecy. And few, even of those who admit the 
principle, that the writings of the prophets are to be interpreted 
with due regard to the claims of poetic diction, are found to carry 
it out with any thing like uniform consistency. 

Another cause of lax and unstable interpretation, is a proneness 
to regard prophecies as strictly parallel in point of subject, in 
which the same particular terms or modes of expression are em- 
ployed. Important as verbal parallels must ever be viewed, still it 
is chiefly with respect to their_subserviency to the purposes of 
philological elucidation that their value is to be appreciated. In 
innumerable instances the identical words are used, while the 
subjects treated of have no affinity whatever with each other. To 


XXVili INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. 


transfer, therefore, what is said in one passage to the matter con- 
tained in another, simply on the ground of some degree of verbal 
identity, without at all inquiring whether there be any real agree- 
ment as to persons, nations, events, &c., must necessarily be pro- 
ductive of the grossest perversion of Divine truth. By jumbling pro- 
phecies together which ought to have been kept perfectly distinct, the 
Spirit of God is forced to put a construction upon his own words 
totally different from that which he intended they should bear. 

The meaning of prophecy has likewise been greatly obscured, by 
the propensity of most commentators to indulge in mystical, or 
spiritual modes of interpretation.’ Not satisfied with the obvious 
literal application, they endeavour to elicit more recondite or 
spiritual senses. ΤῸ abide by the simple import of a passage, if 
that import be temporal or earthly in its aspect, is deemed not only 
meagre and confined, but carnal, and unworthy of the Spirit of 
inspiration. Accordingly another construction is superinduced 
upon it, which is supposed to be richer and more dignified in itself, 
and better fitted to promote edification. If these writers had 
merely deduced spiritual inferences from such temporal predictions, 
or made observations upon them for purposes of godly improve- 
ment, they would have conferred a benefit upon their readers ; but 
the effect of their applying them in such a way as to convey the 
idea, that they are giving the mind of the Spirit, is to destroy all 
certainty of interpretation, to throw open the Scriptures to the 
inroads of imagination and caprice, and, by invalidating a very 
considerable portion of the evidence which prophecy furnishes of 
the Divine authority of the Bible, to pave the way for the spread 
of scepticism and infidelity. 'Tosuch a mode of interpretation may 
justly be applied the admirable remark of Hooker, “ There is 
nothing more dangerous than this licentious and deluding art, 
which changeth the meaning of words, as alchymy doth or would 
do the substance of metals, maketh of any thing what it listeth, 
and bringeth in the end all truth to nothing.” 

Nearly allied to this method is the theory of a double sense of 
prophecy, which has also been very extensively adopted. While 


1 “God knows, what a multitude of meanings the wit of man imagineth to 
himself in the Scriptures, which neither Moses, the Prophets, nor the Apostles 
ever conceived,”—Raleigh’s Hist. of the World, chap. ii. § 1. 

> Ecclesiastical Polity, Book v. sect. 59. 


INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION, XXIX 


it is granted by those who advocate this theory, that many of the 
predictions of the Hebrew seers have a lower or temporal sense, 
z.e. that they treat of persons and circumstances in the history of 
the Jews and the surrounding nations, it is maintained that, over 
and above this, they were intended to teach certain truths respecting 
the person, people, kingdom, and enemies of Christ. According to 
this view of the subject, in interpreting prophecy we are to look for 
a two-fold accomplishment: first, one that is temporal, and then 
another corresponding to it that is spiritual. We may primarily 
interpret of the inferior object whatever in the prediction is found 
susceptible of being applied to it; but having done this, we are, by 
means of analogy, to find out some higher object which it is 
supposed to resemble or prefigure, and to this we are to apply it in 
its secondary and plenary sense. 

To this theory it may justly be objected, that it is unnecessary, 
unsatisfactory, and unwarranted. It is wnnecessary, because there 
is really no prophecy which may not consistently \be restricted to 
one sense—such a sense as fully meets all the exigencies of the 
connexion in which it occurs. It is unsatisfactory, because on the 
same principle that a second sense is brought out, it may be 
maintained that a third, and even a fourth is couched under the 
language; and some expositors have actually gone this length. 
Beyond the meaning which is elicited by a due examination of the 
language, and all the circumstances of the context, every thing 
must necessarily be indeterminate and arbitrary.t. In all other 
writings we expect to find one definite sense in which the authors 
have designed to be understood; unless, indeed, like the heathen 
oracles, what they wrote was expressly intended to be equivocal 
and deceptive. And we should naturally come to the Bible under 
the influence of a similar impression, were it not that we have 
been taught to look for a greater fulness of meaning than the 
primary interpretation seems to supply. We should expect that, 

1 Potest alius aliud, et argutius fingere, et veri cum similitudine suspicari. 
Potest aliud tertius ; potest aliud quartus: atque, ut se tulerint ingeniorum 
opinantium qualitates, ita singule res possunt infinitis interpretationibus expli- 
cari, Cum enim e rebus occlusis omnis ista, quee dicitur Allegoria, sumatur, nec 
habeat finem certam, in quo rei, que dicitur, sit fixa atque immota sententia, uni- 
cuique liberum est in id, quo velit, attrahere lectionum, et affirmare id positum, 
a i eum sua suspicio, et conjectura opinabilis duxerit—Arnobius adversus 

eves. 


XXX INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. 


in revealing his will to us, God has spoken, as men speak, in a fixed 
and determinate manner, and not left lis meaning to be dependent 
upon the fertility or the freaks of human imagination." What is 
literal we should, at once, interpret literally; and what is figurative 
we should, without hesitation, interpret figuratively. To language 
which describes affairs belonging to the Jews, or to other nations, 
we should not scruple to give a direct historical interpretation : 
whereas that which sets forth our Saviour and his kingdom, we 
should confine to these sublime subjects, as the sphere to which it 
exclusively belongs. It is only by such distinctive explication of 
the several prophecies of Scripture, that we can shew, in a satis- 
factory and convincing manner, when and how they have been 
fulfilled. And the theory of a double sense is wnwarranted, there 
being no Scripture authority in its favour. Whatever applications 
are made by one of the Sacred Writers of what had been published 
by another, whether it be for the purpose of illustration, of excite- 
ment, or of confirmation, from no single passage can it be shewn 
that the words, as they stand in the original author, were designed 
to be taken in more meanings than one.’ 

One additional source of divarication in the interpretation of 
prophecy to which reference must be made, is the adoption of 
favourite hypotheses or systems, to which every thing is made to 
bend, how far-fetched soever may be the exposition. Certain aspects 
of the times; political, ecclesiastical, or party views; peculiar notions 
respecting the whole scheme of prophecy, or some insulated part of 
it; in short, any opinions that strongly bias the mind, and lead it 
to regard all subjects only in the supposed relation in which they 
stand to them, must necessarily exert a pernicious influence on pro- 
phetical exegesis. 

On the neologian mode of interpretation, which entirely sets 
aside all prophecy strictly so called, it would be superfluous to 
remark, since it can only be approved by those whose minds are 


τ Absit a nobis, ut Deum faciamus δίγλωττον, aut multiplices sensus affinga- 
mus ipsius verbo, in quo potius, tanquam in speculo limpidissimo, sui autoris 
simplicitatem contemplari debemus. Ps. xii.7, xix.9. Unicus ergo sensus scripture, 
nempe grammaticus, est admittendus, quibus demum terminis, vel propriis vel 
tropicis et figuratis exprimatur.—Maresius in his Anti-Tirinus. 

2 Non enim est nisi unicus Scripture sensus, a Deo illius auctore intentus, 
constans, et fecundus, planus, lectorique attento, quantum ad dicendum libera- 
tionis medium sufficit, obvius.—Gurtleri Instit, Theolog. pp. 16, 17. 


INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. XXXl 


under the unhappy influence of the same infidel principles by which 
it is engendered. 

Examples might have been given in illustration of the different 
methods just adverted to, but they would occupy more space than 
can here be afforded. The reader will find them in abundance in 
almost every commentary, and in other works on prophecy. 


In proceeding to interpret any prophetical book of Scripture, it 
is first of all requisite to obtain a general idea of its contents: in 
the abstract, in order, with greater facility, to determine the mutual 
relations and bearings of its different parts. This may be done 
with complete certainty, whatever obscurity may appear to rest 
upon particular subjects of which it treats. Just as the traveller 
from some distant position takes a survey of the region which he is 
about to explore; observes its mountains, valleys, forests, rivers, &c. ; 
and so determines its grand outlines, that, though many of the 
objects may only be dimly seen, and he may be able to form no 
proper or adequate idea of their more minute or peculiar features, 
yet he gains a general notion of the country, and is prepared for the 
more special investigations which he may institute in the course of 
his future progress. 

As few of the prophets handle only one subject, it should next 
be matter of inquiry, What divisions of the book obviously present 
themselves? in other words, Where are the points of transition by 
which the writer passes from one subject to another? And, 
whether these transitions be arbitrary; or, whether they form a 
logical nexus, indicating the relation in which the subjects stand to 
each other? In the latter case, the nature of the relation should be 
carefully examined, and the degree of influence which may reason- 
ably be assigned to it definitely ascertained. 

These observations admit, indeed, of application to all the books 
of Scripture, whether prophetical or otherwise; but, as those pos- 
sessing the former character are confessedly the most difficult, their 
special importance as bearing upon them must be apparent. 

Since the style and mode of representation employed by a prophet, 
as well as the selection of the subjects of which he treats, may be 
expected to be more or less influenced by the circumstances in which 
he was placed, the condition and relations of the people to whom 
his messages were addressed, and the part which he took in the 


XXxXii INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. 


direction of public affairs, an interpreter ought to make himself 
well acquainted with the history of the times in which he flou- 
rished. A mere glance at the references made by Isaiah to the 
corruptions which abounded in the reigns of Jotham and Ahaz, 
the invasions of Pekah and Rezin, of 'Tiglath-pileser, Shalmaneser, 
and Sennacherib, and the alliances of the Jews with Egypt, is 
sufficient to shew, that a knowledge of the periods in question, 
and the circumstances connected with the political events which 
then transpired, is indispensable to a just and full understanding of 
his book.’ 

In examining the contents of the prophetical books, care must 
be taken to distinguish between those parts which are simply pre- 
dictive, and such as are doctrinal, or corrective of degenerate morals. 
These books, and especially that of our prophet, contain not only 
prophecies both of a more general and a more special nature, 
but a vast variety of didactic matter, arising out of, or connected 
with them, as well as numerous important practical lessons 
altogether independent in their character. The prophets were 
commissioned not merely to foretell the future destinies of their 
nation, and of other states in their relations to it; the advent, 
character, and work of the Messiah, and the establishment and 
aspects of his kingdom; but to act in the capacity of extraordinary 
public instructors of the people. It devolved upon them to vindi- 
cate the attributes, claims, and government of Jehovah, and to 
inculcate the various duties which are incumbent upon his intel- 
ligent creatures, both in reference to Him and to one another. 
Nowhere, except in the New Testament, is there such a fulness of 
instruction on all these points as in Isaiah. In no book of Scripture 
are they more distinctly or energetically enforced. 

The prophecies, strictly so called, relate, some to a nearer, and 
some to a more remote futurity ; some to what was to transpire in 
the prophet’s own time, and some to events that were to happen 
ages afterwards. Some refer to individual persons, others to par- 
ticular cities, and a third class to whole nations. ΤῸ certain 
subjects only a single prophecy is devoted; while others, more 
important in their character, are taken up in several distinct pre- 
dictions. Some are special; others are altogether general. It is 


’ Dr. J. Pye Smith on the Interpretation of Prophecy, pp. 17—23, 33—39. 


INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. XXXill 


the duty of an interpreter to allow to each of these points of view 
the degree of influence which it may claim on his attention, and 
his application of the principles of exegesis. 

The greatest pains should ever be taken to determine the precise 
subject of a prophecy. With a view to this, its several characteris- 
tic attributes should be diligently studied; the force and bearing of 
the language patiently examined ; and any apparently parallel pro- 
phecies carefully compared. Inattention to this rule must funda- 
mentally affect the interpretation; and its neglect has, more than 
any thing besides, been productive of perversion and confusion in 
the exposition of prophecy. 

Those predictions which relate to the Jews as a people, or to 
other nations, as Babylon, Egypt, Tyre, &c., are to be restricted 
in their interpretation to such nations, and are not to be applied to 
the Christian church, either in her pure, or her corrupt state, nor 
to the enemies of the faith and kingdom of Christ. It has, indeed, 
been contended, that, as in the New Testament we find the terms 
“ Jew” and “Israel” applied to the spiritual seed of Abraham, 
whether naturally descended from him or not; and, as in the 
Apocalypse, “Sodom,” “Egypt,” and “ Babylon,” are employed to 
denote the apostate and idolatrous church of Rome, we are at full 
liberty to appropriate to the times of the Christian dispensation, 
whatever we may find associated with such names in the prophecies 
of the Old Testament,—it being assumed, that the former were 
constituted types of the latter. But it is only necessary to state in 
reply, that in no part of the gospels, or the apostolical writings, is 
the slightest intimation ever given, that these terms as used in the 
Old Testament are to be thus taken. When applied to Christian 
affairs in the New, there is always some qualifying epithet accom- 
panying their use; and they are merely appropriated, in order to 
bring before the mind of the reader-some points of analogy, which 
might serve as apt illustrations of the subject in hand. When, for 
instance, the writer of the Apocalypse employs language in appli- 
cation to the spiritual Babylon which the prophets, Isaiah and 
Jeremiah, apply to the literal, no hint is given that these 
writers actually predicted the character and fate of the former. 
He simply adopts their phraseology, and some of their modes of 
representation, as well adapted to express what he had to deliver 
respecting the idolatrous community, which occupies so conspicuous 
a place in his book. Want of attention to this principle has, more 

6 


XXXIV INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. 


or less, proved a source of great error in the interpretation of Old 
Testament prophecy. 

This rule may be viewed as specially bearing upon such prophe- 
cies, as refer to the past and future restoration of the Jews. Ex- 
positors in general, without scruple or hesitation, interpret literally 
those predictions which involve the punishment of that people, 
such as the destruction of their city and polity, their captivity, dis- 
persion, &c.; but whenever they come to those which hold out the 
prospect of their conversion, re-establishment in Canaan, &c., they 
almost uniformly apply them to the conversion of sinners generally, 
or to the prosperity of the Christian church. But not only is such 
a mode of interpretation at once unfair and inconsistent; it also 
breaks up the continuity and antithetical character of many of the 
prophecies, does violence to the established usage of the language, 
and forces the expositor to gloss over, or to leave untouched what- 
ever is opposed to his system. It is utterly subversive of all settled, 
consistent, and thorough-going exposition. 

In the assured conviction, based upon the testimony of Jesus.and 
his inspired Apostles,! that the Jewish prophets actually predicted 
his manifestation, character, work, and kingdom, every Christian 
interpreter will diligently mark and investigate those portions of 
the prophecies which are obviously designed to be thus applied. 
While some have found Christ almost every where in the propheti- 
cal and other books of the Old Testament, and others have mani- 
fested a reluctance to find him any where, the enlightened and 
conscientious believer is anxious to discover him precisely with that 
degree of frequency with which the Holy Spirit has really pre- 
sented him to the view. While he rejoices at every thing which 
reminds him of Him who ‘is the end of the law for righteousness 
to every one that believeth,” his mind instinctively revolts from the 
idea of laying violent hands upon a single passage of Scripture, in 
order to force it to give testimony to him. Numerous are those 
passages which admit of no consistent application to any merely 
human king or deliverer, or to the affairs of any temporal and 
earthly kingdom, but point out a Divine Saviour, and the establish- 
ment of an order of things purely spiritual and heavenly. Of 
these, Isaiah vii. 14—16, ix. 6, 7, xi. 1—10, xxxii. 1, &e., xlil. 
xlix. 1—9, lii. 13, liii. xi. 1—3, are illustrious specimens. If we 


1 Luke xxiv. 25—27, 44—47; John xii. 87—41; Acts viii. 30—35, x. 43, 
EXvi, 22, 28; Rom: iii. 21; 22; 1 Pet. i, 11; 12; Rev. xix. 10. 


INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. XXXV 


have not, in every case, the infallible support of New Testament 
authority, we nevertheless meet with certain intimations and cha- 
racteristics in the predictions themselves, or in their immediate 
connexion, which compel us to refer them immediately and directly 
to the New Dispensation. 

The language of prophecy, being in many respects peculiar, 
requires to be studied with great care, and to be interpreted with 
the utmost sobriety and caution. Besides much that is simple and 
plain, it exhibits most of the characteristics belonging to .the 
highest species of Oriental poetry: abounding in pictorial, figura- 
tive, metaphorical, symbolical, and parabolical modes of representa- 
tion. Its imagery is luxuriant, bold, sublime, glowing, and highly 
coloured. Its figures are of every variety. Its metaphors, elegant 
and beautiful, are borrowed from almost every object within the 
compass of the visible and invisible worlds. Its symbols are 
splendid, striking, and sometimes terrific. Its personifications are 
daring and majestic. Its whole strain is admirably adapted to 
excite attention, create and keep alive an interest in the subjects, 
and to produce those impressions which are in harmony with its 
nature and design. It is likewise remarkable for its concinnity, 
terseness, and brevity, its bold ellipses, and the frequent abrupt 
changes of person, gender, and tense. With all these particulars, 
the interpreter must render himself familiar, He must not only 
investigate the primary and secondary significations of words, deter- 
mine the meaning of the phrases, the nature of the syntax, and the 
development of the entire sense, but distinguish between the plain 
and the figurative in the style,—divesting what is figurative of the 
imagery with which it is adorned, and thus bringing out the simple 
ideas designed to be conveyed; yet, withal, paying due attention to 
the emphasis or force given to them by such figurative diction. 
And, in order that he may do this with the greater certainty, he 
must take his position in the midst of the same world of poetic 
images in which the prophets lived, and make himself master of the 
entire system of prophetic imagery which they have employed. 

It is a principle satisfactorily brought out by a careful examina- 
tion of the prophecies, that an interpreter is not, on the one hand, 
to expect every thing to be expressed with the utmost clearness, 
nor, on the other, to regard it as involved in dense obscurity, 
Unhappily they have too often been viewed in one or other of 
these extremes. ΤῸ some minds, they body forth, in clear and 


XXXVI INTRODUCTORY DISSERTATION. 


living forms, all the minute details of modern history, as well as 
develop, without the slightest trace of a cloud, the entire horizon 
of antiquity; while to others they are shrouded in impenetrable 
mystery,—to be approached with no hopes of the successful dis- 
covery of truth; or, at best, only to catch a dim and momentary 
glance of it, amidst the shadowy figures by which it is surrounded. 

Much of the obscurity which has been ascribed to prophecy is 
purely subjective. It exists, not in the predictions themselves, 
but in those who come to the study of them. If we have not ren- 
dered ourselves familiar with the characteristics of the prophetic 
style, the history of the times, the manners, customs, and modes of 
thinking of Oriental nations, and a variety of other topics which 
such study requires, it is vain to expect that all should be per- 
spicuous and plain. Numerous terms, phrases, and allusions, which 
must have been perfectly intelligible to those whom the prophets 
addressed, will necessarily appear obscure to us. Nor can it be 
denied, that such prophecies as still remain to be fulfilled, must, in 
the nature of things, be more or less indistinct, as it respects the 
objects of which they treat, how clear or plain soever may be the 
language in which they are expressed. Take, for instance, the 
fifty-third of Isaiah. To us who have the advantage of studying it 
by the light of the evangelic pages, all possesses the perspicuity of 
history ; but in the view of those who lived before the birth of our 
Lord, there must have attached to some parts of it a want of that 
definiteness of meaning which we so readily discover. Thus also as 
it regards certain portions of the Apocalypse. How far, or satis- 
factorily soever we may succeed in determining the import of the 
language, or however clearly we may perceive the design of the 
writer, just as we may conclude from the sketch of a drawing, what 
it is intended to represent, yet the absence of the actual persons or 
events leaves our minds in uncertainty with respect to the positive 
application. Let only those persons or events present themselves 
in the reality of historical existence, and we fully discover the 
import of the prophecy. 

Finally: no person should attempt the interpretation of these 
hallowed records, who is not imbued with a supreme love of truth, 
and who is not habituated to the exercise of humble dependence 
upon the promised assistance of the Holy Spirit, whose it is to 
remove those moral obstacles which prevent the entrance of spiritual 
light into the mind. 


ΣΎ ΟΝ ot ck. 


CHAPTER I. 


This chapter contains an historical introduction, 1; a heavy charge of ingrati- 
tude, corruption, and rebellion, 2—4; a description of the consequent 
punishment, 5—9; an exposure of the vanity of trusting in mere external 
worship, 10—15 ; exhortations and encouragements to repentance, 16—19 ; 
with denunciations of wrath against the impenitent, mixed with promises 


to the penitent, 20—31. 


1 THE vision of Isaiah, the son of Amoz, which he saw, con- 
cerning Judah and Jerusalem, in the days of Uzziah, Jotham, 
Ahaz, and Hezekiah, kings of Judah. 


1. The substantive jin, like its cog- 
nates Mit, ni, nw, WT, MM, and the 
Chald. 3, 817, is derived from the root 
_ m7, which, in poetic style, is used to 
denote seeing or vision generally, but 
more especially that which is super- 
natural, or the result of Divine inspira- 
tion. It corresponds to the prosaic 783, 
which equally denotes both kinds of 
vision : hence the easy transition from 
mi, the name anciently given to the 
prophets, 1 Sam. ix. 9, to 717, 1 Chron. 
xxix. 29, where both names are evi- 
dently synonymous with &2}. x7, and 
my, the LXX. render by ὀπτασία, 
ὅραμα, ὅρασις ; and the former by προ- 
φητεία, 2 Chron. xxxii. 32 ; to which 
correspond 781123 of the Targum, and a 
similar rendering in the Syr. Arab. 
and several modern versions. The 


Arab. usy> > divinavit, hariolatus 


fuit, especially by observing the flight 
of birds, yzarus fuit rei, occulta indi- 
cavit, are unquestionably related to 
the Hebrew, and their significations 
are probably derived from it; but 
though they may be applied in illus- 
tration, they cannot take precedence 


of the Hebrew root. Nothing can be 
more obvious than the reason of the 
appropriation of such terms in de- 
scriptions of supernatural or prophe- 
tic revelation. It is founded on the 
fact, that, in imparting his will to his 
messengers, Jehovah impressed vividly 
upon their minds, the images of the 
things which they were to divulge. 
Their mental vision had presented to 
it matters invisible to the eye of sense, 
but possessing all the reality and dis- 
tinctness of outward objects. The 
term is here employed to denote, not 
the act of seeing on the part of the 
prophet, but the things which he saw 
—the prophetic matter revealed to 
him, together with all the other 
inspired matter contained in the 
book. 

Whether ji is here to be taken 
strictly in the singular, and limited to 
the first division or chapter of the 
book, or, whether it is to be viewed as 
a collective noun marking the contents 
of the whole, depends on the light in 
which we are to regard the entire in- 
scription. Jarchiand Abarbanel, by a 
forced construction of x with ww, 


2 ISATAH. 


[CHAP. I. 


2 Hear, O heavens, and hearken, O earth! 


For Jehovah speaketh ; 


I have nourished and brought up children, 
But as for them—they have rebelled against me. 


instead of referring it to ὑπ, to which 
it properly belongs, suppose it to de- 
signate only the first chapter ; but it 
is quite incongruous to imagine that 
so small a portion required the reigns 
of four kings for its delivery. Vitringa, 
Eichhorn, Rosenmiiller, and Maurer, 
are of opinion that the original in- 
scription ended with the word o7d™ ; 
that it had relation only to the first 
chapter ; that after the death of the 
prophet, when his oracles were col- 
lected, this one was placed first to 
serve as a title and introduction to the 
whole book; and that the specification 
of the kings was then added to com- 
plete the inscription, by assigning the 
period of the prophet’s ministry. This 
solution Lowth pronounces to be judi- 
cious ; and Gesenius allows it to be 
ingenious, though he is not quite 
satisfied with it. Le Clerc, Michaelis, 
Hitzig, Scholz, J. A. Alexander, and 
Schroeder, in MS., consider it to be 
the original inscription to the whole. 
That it was thus understood by the 
author of the second book of Chro- 
nicles is beyond all doubt. His words 
are, “Now the rest of the acts of 
Hezekiah, and his goodness, behold 
they are written in the vision of 
Isaiah, the son of Amoz,” ch. xxxii. 
32,—the identical terms of our text. 
Rosenmiiller, Eichhorn, and Koppe, 
endeavour, indeed, to enervate this 
proof by rendering ja “ together with 
the vision,” &c., and confining it to 
the portion contained in ch. xxxvi— 
xxxix.; but Gesenius has shewn, that 
their argument founded on the use of 
2” after 1n2 is groundless, since this 
verb is also frequently construed with 
a, and that it is more natural to under- 
stand the reference to be to a definite 
collection of prophecies, in which, as 
well as in the book of Kings, the 
accounts of Hezekiah were to be found. 
I accede, therefore, to the opinion of 
the interpreters mentioned above, who 
view the words as the inscription of 
the whole collection. 


Isaiah, the son of Amoz. See Introd. 

Dwr», LXX. and Theodion 
kara, Symm. περὶ, as the LXX. have © 
rendered this preposition, chap. ii. 1, 
where Symmachus employs ὑπὲρ ; Je- 
rome szper. Were the denunciations 
immediately following, alone intended, 
the adverse meaning would be proper ; 
butif reference is had to the contents 
of the book generally, the preposition 
must be rendered concerning ; and it is 
thus given by the best interpreters. 
The circumstance, that predictions 
affecting other nations besides the 
Jews are found in the book, forms no 
valid objection against such construc- 
tion: whatever relates to them being 
introduced on account of its intimate 
bearing upon the interests of that 
people. By Judah and Jerusalem are 
meant the Jewish state, or the two 
tribes of Judah and Benjamin, usually 
comprehended under the former name; 
and the inhabitants of the metropolis 
in particular—the centre of the king- 
dom, and the great source of religious 
and political influence. Sometimes we 
find the inverse order of the words: 
mM) ow, as chap. iii. 1 ; v.3; Ezra 
11. 1, ὅσο, ; but both forms are opposed 
to Hphraim and Samaria. 

mim %272—32. See Introd. 

2. PIN—DY, τὰ πάντα, the universe. 
A splendid instance of poetical apo- 
strophe. All created beings, whether 
rational or irrational, are summoned 
to listen to the charge to be preferred 
by Jehovah against his rebellious and 
ungrateful people. The words of the 
prophet, and those of Moses, Deut. 
xxxii. 1, are strikingly parallel. Nor is 
the parallelism of the subjects less 
complete—the manifestation of the 
Divine goodness, and the ingratitude 
of the Hebrews, its recipients ; and it 
is not without reason Calvin conjec- 
tures, that there is an imitation of the 
celebrated song of theJewish legislator, 
whom all the prophets took for their 
model. ‘Tesaias hic Mosen imitatus 
est, sicuti mos est omnibus prophetis.” 


CHAP. 1.] 


3 The ox knoweth his owner, 
And the ass his master’s erib : 
But Israel doth not know ; 
My people doth not consider! 


The position of Vitringa, which has 
been adopted by Lowth, Gesenius, and 
others, that God here institutes a 
judicial proceeding, and that heaven 
and earth are addressed as judges in 
the cause, is scarcely in keeping with 
the point and vehemence of the per- 
sonification. The spirit of the passage 
is more in accordance with that of 
Jer. ii. 12,13. To supply 75 sic before 
727, as some propose, would, in such 
connexion, detract from the dignity of 
the style, and be quite abhorrent from 
the wsus loquendi which connects 75 
with Vox, never with 127. The change 
of 127 into 735 is equally unjustifiable. 
Comp. Ps. 1.1. Coverdale renders it 
in the present tense, which ought to 
have been retained in our common 
version.—0’2a, The Hebrews are fre- 
quently spoken of as the sons of God, 
partly to indicate the relation in which 
they stood to him in virtue of the 
Sinaic covenant, by which the nation 
solemnly acknowledged him to be her 
husband ; and partly to suggest the 
idea of paternal and filial love. Comp. 
Exod. iv. 22; Deut. xxxii. 5, 6 ; Hos. 
xi. 1; Mal.i. 2, 6. This relationship 
is recognised by Paul, Rom. ix. 4, 
where he ascribes υἱοθεσία to the Is- 
raelites. While other nations were 
ou, ver. 7, the former stood in this 
near relation to Jehovah, and were 
treated accordingly, both in the way 
of kindness and of chastisement. The 
verbs *‘mN27) ἘΣ are thus joined, chap. 
xxiil. 4; Ezek. xxxi.4; and, what is 
remarkable, they occur in the same 
order, as the proper names (M772 
ἜΣ ΠΌΤ) of two of the sons of Heman, 
1 Chron. xxv. 4, 29, 31. Such occur- 
rence confirms the opinion of Kimchi, 
that they are perfectly synonymous, 
and shews the fallacy of Vitringa’s 
interpretation, according to which the 
former verb signifies to educate, and 
the latter fo evalt; as if they referred 
to certain distinct periods in the his- 
tory of the Hebrews. Such synonymic 
combinations are common in the lan- 


ISAIAH. 


Oo 


guage, and are employed for the sake 
of intensity. God had exercised the 
greatest care over his people; he had 
conferred upon them a profusion of 
benefits. No father could have con- 
ducted himself so attentively -and 
kindly in the education of his children. 
—1 wee, they have rebelled against me, 
may be extended so as to comprehend 
idolatry, and very often has this mean- 
ing; but it also expresses defection 
from Jehovah in any way, only that 
it be atrocious in degree. In this con- 
nexion, it naturally suggests the idea 
of filial disobedience : though, in a theo- 
cratic point of view, it was strictly 


rebellion. Like its cognates ee 
: ᾽ 
abscidit, dirupit ; ἜΣ a Deo pre- 


seriptum agendi modum reliquit, et a vero 


et justo defecit, as pl we es? or 


a) improbus, nequam, it signifies ¢o 


break, break up a connexion, break off 
Jrom any one ; hence the form N77) ws, 
2 Kings viii. 20, 22, to revolt from 
under the power of another ; and with 
3, and ὅν, when the idea of hostility is 
designed to be marked. From the 
violence which it implies, Y¢® is one 
of the strongest terms employed in 
Heb. to denote sin. 

3. To aggravate the stupidity of the 
Hebrews, two of the tame animals are 
introduced, which, though proverbial 
for their dulness and inattention, 
nevertheless discover an instinctive 
regard for their master, and the place 
where they are fed. Comp. Jer, viii. 7. 
Dix some render sfa//; but it rather 
denotes the crib in which the fodder 
is placed, being derived from D:2x, to 
feed ; Arab. ual collegit rem ; cl , 
qui ornat atrium, instruitque cibo suo et 
potu. Thus Kimchi ; nvana7 2x0 O19 ; 
LXX. φάτνη ; Vulg. presepe. Lowth 
attempts unsuccessfully to shew, that 
‘mix, me, has been lost out of the text 


4 ISATAH. 


[CHAP. I. 


4 Wo to the sinful nation! the people laden with guilt! 
The race of evil-doers! corrupt children ! 


They have forsaken Jehovah ; 


One of Israel; 
They have wholly gone back. 


after ‘xt. The word is, indeed, 
supplied in the LXX. and Vulg., and 
pov in Aquila and Theodion ; but these 
versions merely fill up what was 
deemed an ellipsis. The insertion of 
1 before the same word is equally with- 
out authority from Heb. MSS., though 
found in the LXX., Syr., Aq., Theod., 
and Vulg. It is found before ‘sy in 
about thirty MSS., but this also may 
be merely the result of emendation. 
The history of the Hebrew text 
evinces that this conjunction was 
more likely to be added than omitted 
—owing chiefly to inattention to one 
of the distinctive features of poetry, 
the frequent ellipsis of conjunctions, 
&c. in the second member of a paral- 
lelism. 421277 heightens the idea ex- 
pressed in the preceding clause, and 
is designed to develop more clearly 
the guilty want of discrimination on 
the part of the Hebrews. That "τὴ" 
is to be understood of the whole 
people, and not, as some would limit 
it, of the Jews only, appears from the 
fact, that it is never used in this 
limited sense by any prophet who 
wrote before the captivity. 

4, Τὴ ἦλ %7 Gesenius discovers a pa- 
ronomasia which he imitates in— 
Schande dem siindigen Lande; but the 
assonance is perhaps purely acci- 
dental. The interjection is most com- 
monly used in comminations, and is 
evidently to be so taken here, som, 
The participle expresses habit : s¢xning 
nation ; a nation addicted to deviation 
from the path of rectitude. 732 is not 
a segolate noun, as Jarchi takes it, but 
a construct form of the adjective 729, 
as is proved by the analogy of 7px, Jy. 
The LXX. change the figure of a bur- 
den, which most naturally conveys the 
notion of the oppressive property of 
guilt, and the unsupportable punish- 
ment which it entails, into that of an 
element with which the subjects of 
iniquity are filled: λαὸς πληρὴς apap- 


they have contemned the Holy 


τιῶν. They also weaken the force of 
Py, though they render it by the plural 
of ἁμαρτία, the term more appropri- 
ately expressive of 78en. Both signify 
the missing of a mark, deviation from the 
right way: whereas 2 denotes perver- 
sity, that which is distorted, crooked, 
or turned away from its proper posi- 
tion or direction. Root my; Arab. 


use in latus inflexit rem, torsit, dis- 


torsit, &c., to twist, bend, make crooked, 
distort,—OYY2 YY, is not to be under- 
stood with any reference to the pro- 
genitors of the Hebrews, though the 
character too aptly applies to the great 
body of the nation, in almost every 
period of its history, but marks that 
of those who lived in the time of 
Isaiah. Thus, as to sense, the LXX. 
σπέρμα πονηρόν. The phrase, as Theo- 
doret remarks, has its parallel in 
γεννήματα ἐχιδνῶν, Matt. 111, 7, and in 
sense, though not in form, in γενεὰ 
πονηρὰ καὶ μοιχαλὶς, Matt. xii. 39. 
oy Hiph. part. of ȴ3, to crash, break, 
hurt, do evil, commit injury. Hence YYD, 
an injurious person, an evil-doer.—There 
is no necessity, with Lowth, to con- 
vert DTW into MNT, the part. of 
Hoph. The difference of pronuncia- 
tion is too great, and the circumstance, 
that five MSS. omit the ’ is of no con- 
sequence, as this apocopated form of 
the conjugation is of frequent oc- 
currence. Comp. 2 Chron, xxvii. 2. 
Zwinglius: “corrumpere facientes, 
ponuntur pro tam corruptis ut alios 
corrumpere possint, hoc est pro per- 
ditissimis et corruptissimis.” The 
active participle may be understood 
either in a transitive or intransitive 
sense, according as we take it abso- 
lutely, or supply 592, or 037], after it. 
If the former, the passage may be 
rendered corrupting, or destructive 
children ; if the latter, vicious chil- 
dren, 7.e. such as act corruptly, or 
viciously, The LXX. ἄνομοι; the 


CHAP. I.] 


ISAIAH. 


Or 


5 Why will ye be further smitten ? 


Why will ye increase revolt ? 
The whole head is sick, 
And the whole heart faint. 


others, διαφθείροντες. Y, Arab Sad 


procul fuit, abfuit, procul evagatus fuit 
pascendo camelus, vesperi non revertens : 
to run away, as camels, horses, &c. from 
their master. The Heb. verb also sig- 
nifies to loosen the bands or cords by 
which beasts of burden are fastened. 
See Exod. xxiii. 5, and Gesen. in loc. 
It is frequently used of a dereliction 
of Jehovah. fs}, in addition to the 
idea of leaving, conveyed by XY, ex- 
presses the contemptuous feeling in 
which it originated, and an obstinate 
determination to persevere in a course 
of disobedience— x7 wip, the Holy 
One of Israel, i.e. the Sacred Object of 
their veneration and love ; the infinite 
source of purity; the hater and 
avenger of all moral pollution. The 
genitive is that of simple relationship, 
not strictly that of subject ; for, while 
the Jews in the time of the prophet 
professed to serve Jehovah, or to have 
him for their God, they were, for the 
most part, destitute of the feelings 
which his character was calculated to 
inspire. If they had truly regarded 
him as “the Holy One,” they could 
not have acted the part here ascribed 
to them. The use of this epithet is 
almost exclusively confined to Isaiah ; 
occurring nearly thirty times in the 
course of his prophecies, but only five 
times besides in the whole Bible. It 
thus forms one of the distinguishing 
characteristics of his style, and fur- 
nishes strong evidence in favour of 
the genuineness of the entire book.— 
1432, Niph. of 13, a synonyme of 0 
and »D, the latter of which likewise 
takes We after it. All three verbs 
signify to turn away, recede, or depart 
Jrom, and are especially employed to 
designate apostasy from God. Ps. liii. 
43; xiv.3; xliv.19; Zeph. i. 6. Niph. 
is frequently reciprocal, and seems to 
have this force in the present instance. 
The addition of mx gives emphasis to 
the declaration. Aq. and Theod. 


render: ἀπηλλοτριώθησαν εἰς τὰ ὀπί- 


ow; but ™ has the signification of 
“ strange ” only in the _ participial 
forms %and WW». In reference to the 
peculiar character of the prophet’s 
style in this verse, Zwinglius asks: 
“ Quis oro Demosthenes aut Cicero 
tam brevibus omnia perfecit et adpa- 
ravit, ut ad summam rei cum tanta 
opportunitate tantoque decoro perve- 
nerit Ῥ’ Comment. in loc. 

5. πιο-ποῦν, Misled by a false 
construction of the following context, 
Jerome, Lowth, Gesenius, and many 
moderns, translate “on what part,” 
and fortify their rendering by the 
classical parallels :— 


Vix habet in vobis jam nova plaga locum. 
Ovip. 
Γέμω κακῶν δὴ κ᾽ οὐκέτ᾽ ἐσθ᾽ ὅπη τιθῇ. 
Evrip. 
But, such construction, however ap- 
propriately it may seem to agree with 
the totally diseased state of the body, 
spoken of immediately afterwards, ill 
accords with the introduction of the 
verb ἘΠ, which requires the repe- 
tition of ποῦν, of which there is an 
evident ellipsis. The phrase has doubt- 
less the local meaning, Job xxxviii. 6, 
and 2 Chron. xxxii. 10; but every- 
where else, that of why? wherefore ? 
The interpretation of Lowth, “on 
what part will ye smite again ; will ye 
add correction ?”—applying the lan- 
guage to the persons who were the 
instruments of God’s vengeance, is a 
complete failure, and spoils the force 
of the original, in which there is a 
sudden and spirited transition from 
the third person to the second, for 
the purpose of producing poignant 
conviction by a direct address. No- 
thing, indeed, can be more tame than 
the introduction of a third party.— 
m7D, as a fem. noun, from “0, occurs 
in the sense of defection from Jeho- 
vah, Deut. xiii. 6; Jer. xxviii. 16, 
xxix. 32; Isa. xxxi. 6, lix. 13; in the 
two last of which passages, the Bishop 
himself renders it “revolt ;” so that 


A 


6 ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. I. 


6 From the sole of the foot even to the head, 


There is no soundness in it ; 


But wounds, and stripes, and fresh sores ; 
They have not been pressed, nor bound up, 


Nor softened with oil. 


7 As for your country—it is desolate ; 


Your cities are burnt with fire ; 


As for your land—foreigners devour it in your presence ; 
It is desolate—a land overthrown by foreigners. 


his attempt to trace it analogically to 
1D’, was unnecessary. Besides, there 
is no such derivation from this root 
in Hebrew usage, its only derivative 
being 1019, which frequently occurs. 
The address is not without irony ; 
proceeding on the principle, that the 
Jews had revolted, in order that they 
might be punished: while it is strongly 
implied, that their continuance in sin 
would only increase their punishment. 
Winer and Hitzig render %, distribu- 
tively, —“ every head” and “ every 
heart,’—on the ground that it is 
anarthrous; but the omission of the 
article is not unfrequent in poetic and 
prophetic composition. See Gesen. 
Lehrg. ὃ 168, 3, «β. The 2 in such con- 
struction, denotes state or condition. 
The two noblest parts of the human 
body are here selected to represent 
the body politic; and the extreme 
danger to which it was exposed is sig- 
nificantly set forth under the image of 
universal sickness and languor. There 
was no part which did not suffer from 
the calamities which sin had entailed. 
The allegation of this passage, in 
proof of the doctrine of original sin, 
or of the total depravity of human 
nature, is totally unwarranted by any 
just principle of Biblical interpreta- 
tion. It does not, as Calvin ably 
shews, refer to sin at all, but to its 
punishment. 

6. An affecting amplification of the 
preceding description. ‘3 ἐμ if, i.e. 
ἡ nation, or DY people, understood from 
ver. 4—the subject of which the figu- 
rative language is used being thus 
graphically pointed at. Not only was 
the body covered with different kinds 
of wounds, but some of them were 


quite fresh, and no means had been 
applied to heal them. The verbs here 
employed are not designed to corre- 
spond to the preceding nouns taken 
singly—as if they described different 
modes of treatment appropriate to 
the different wounds: yet, as 7% and 
wa are in the plural, and 723 is in 
the singular, it properly belongs to 
m7 72, while the former refer to P33 
and 7yaT in common. 1 is the plural 
of τ, to press, press out, as blood and 
other matter from wounds. The pro- 
cess in healing a wound was first to 
mollify or soften it with oil, or other 
ointment; then to press out the 
matter which had collected in it ; and 
finally, to bind it with a bandage 
steeped in oiland wine. Comp. Luke 
x. 34; Pliny, Hist. Nat. xxxi. 47; 
Columella, vii. 5, 18. 

7. The prophet now proceeds to 
announce in plain and express terms, 
what he had just delivered in figura- 
tive language. This most graphic de- 
scription of the desolations occasioned 
by hostile invaders. applies to the 
state of the Jewish affairs, when the 
country was overrun by the Israelites 
and Syrians on the one hand, and the 
Edomites and Philistines on the other, 
—a calamity that threatened the en- 
tire subversion of the kingdom, in the 
reign of Ahaz. See 2 Kings xvi. 5, 6; 
2 Chron, xxvii. 5—8, 17, 18 ; Isa. vii. 
1,2. Lowth and De Wette refer the 
invasion here described to the reign 
of Jotham ; Rosenmiiller, after Abar- 
banel, Cocceius, and Grotius, to that 
of Uzziah ; while Jarchi, Vitringa, and 
Eichhorn, consider the events to have 
taken place in the days of Hezekiah. 
The historical circumstances, how- 


CHAP. 1.] 


ISATAH. 7 


8 And the daughter of Zion is left, 


Like a shed in a vineyard, 


Like a booth in a cucumber field, 


Like a besieged city. 


ever, more or less militate against an 

other interpretation than that whic 

places this extreme national distress 
in the time of Ahaz,—the most cor- 
rupt monarch that had yet ascended 
the throne of David. See Gesen. i. p. 
147. 7 78 is used in this place, both 
for the cultivated land and its pro- 
duce, or the fruits which grew upon it. 
Hence it is said to be eaten by the 
invaders, and to be burnt with fire. 
According to Kimchi, it signifies 
DNR AVI nw, “sown fields and 
the trees belonging to them.” For 03, 
“barbarians,” Lowth proposes to read, 
Du, “an inundation,”’—a translation 
which is countenanced by Saadias, 


ἜΝ keh , schultens, who com- 


pares the Arab. Sad » Michaelis, Dee- 


derlein, Hensler, and others ; but itis 
otherwise unsupported, unnecessary, 
and, as Calvin calls it, coactum. 1s 
the participle of 1, ¢o be strange, to act 
hostilely, and signifies a barbarian, or 
a foreign enemy. The 3 prefixed to 
n2B79, is the Caph veritatis, or of inten- 
siveness, Which marks the reality or 
superlative degree of the quality pre- 
dicated. The words, therefore, contain 
no comparison ; but express the great- 
ness of the catastrophe :—an over- 
throw, such as only barbarians could 
effect. The LXX. render properly: 
kal ἠρήμωται κατεστραμμένη ὑπὸ λαῶν 
ἀλλοτρίων. 

8. ΤῈ 73, daughter of Zion ; a poetic 
Hebraism for Zion herself. m3, like 
023, sons, is sometimes used to denote 
the inhabitants of a city or country, 
as wun na, chap. xxiii. 10; 17a, Ps, 
xly. 13; O78 na. Lam. iv. 22; but it 
is also often transferred to designate 
the city or country itself. “ Prosopo- 
peice idiotismus est Hebreeorum, quo 
urbes et municipia foeminarum, aut 
filiarum periphrasi adpellant.” Zwin- 
hus, . Thus, 73 ma, Ps, cxxxvil. 8. 
This idiom, under various modifica- 
tions, is exceedingly common in Ara- 


maic. Comp. the use of Wo), el wh 
and «wy, in Arab. ; and of 3, ox, 


and 73,in Heb. In poetry, Zion is fre- 
quently put for Jerusalem, of which 
it formed the most ancient part, and 
formed the southernmost and highest 
of the hills on which the city was 
built. The name is derived from ΠΗ͂Σ, 
to be bright, sunny, dry; and seems 
rather to have obtained the designa- 
tion from its shining aspect, than from 
any supposed barrenness or aridity. 
At all events, in the present day, it is 
not unfruitful; for Dr. Richardson 
found one part of it supporting a crop 
of barley, and another undergoing the 
labour of the plough; and Mr. Carne 
mentions a crop of corn as growing on 
its sides. See Horne’s Introd. vol. iii. 
p. 19, note. To depict the exact posi- 
tion of the metropolis, as standing 
alone in the midst of surrounding ruin 
and desolation, the prophet employs 
three appropriate comparisons. The 
first is that of a single booth or hut, 
constructed of the boughs and small 
branches of trees, usually erected in a 
vineyard for the shelter of persons 
stationed to protect the grapes from 
the attacks of thieves, foxes, &c. The 
second refers to a similar hut or lodge 
in the midst of a field appropriated to 
the growing of cucumbers, which is 
the only object visible at any distance, 
and is often attached to the highest 
part of a pole or tree, in order to 
afford security from the wild beasts by 
night. See chap. xxiv. 20. πῦρ, for 


mapa, Arab. $a, a place of cucum- 
bers,—properly, the Egyptian melon ; 
owe, Numb. xi.5; Arab. (is, rasvt, 
decorticavit. Comp.(43, idem. They 


are longer than the common cucum- 
ber, of a deeper green, a softer and 
smoother skin, sweeter, and more easy 
of digestion ; being very cooling, they 


8 ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. 1. 


9 Except Jehovah of Hosts had left us a very small remnant, 
We should have been like Sodom, 
We should have resembled Gomorrah. 


are greatly in request. Hitzig. The 
third object of comparison is 712} TY, 
which has been variously interpreted. 
Not satisfied with the ordinary signi- 
fication of YY, Scheid. and Tingstadius 
derive it from VY, to watch, and render, 
“a tower” or “ watch-tower in a gar- 


den ;” (yd in Arab. signifying hortum.) 


This interpretation is partly adopted 
by Hitzig ; only he considers the YY to 
be a place of shelter, and supposes a 
tower to be meant, such as is common 
in oriental villages, from which a view 
is commanded of the surrounding 
country, and into which the inha- 
bitants retreat on the approach of 
enemies. 7932 he takes to be a noun, 
formed like 7y128, Ayw, ὅσο. This would 
be philologically unobjectionable, were 
it supported by usage ; and his trans- 
lation, “as a tower of observation,” 
well suits the connexion, The inter- 
pretation, however, which derives 712} 
from 12}, in the acceptation of hostile 
watching or besieging, (it being then 
the regular past part,) is to be pre- 
ferred, not only to the above modes of 
elucidation, but also to that of “a 
preserved” or “delivered city,” pro- 
posed by Michaelis, and adopted by 
Koppe, Rosenmiiller, J. Moller, and 
approved by Gesenius in his Com- 
ment. but abandoned in his Lex. Man. 
in which he renders, wrbs obsessa. With 
this last interpretation agree the LXX. 
Chal. and Syr. and it is fully sup- 
ported by the Ben. part. O23, being 
used to denote desiegers, Jer. iv. 16. 
The version of Lowth, “taken by 
siege,’ has no other countenance than 
the rendering of the Vulg. ; the πολιορ- 
κουμένη of the LXX. to which the 
Bishop appeals, expressing simply the 
fact, that the siege was being carried 
on, not that the city had been taken, 
which would have ill accorded with 
the idea of the prophet. Jerusalem 
itself not having been actually be- 
sieged on the occasion here referred 
to, however threatened with such a 
calamity by the surrounding enemies, 


might well be compared to a city in 
such circumstances. 

9. 2, except, compounded of %, i/, 
and Ὁ, for οἷ, zof—msiz Tim, Jehovah 
of hosts. This divine appellation ap- 
pears first to have come into use in 
the time of Samuel, in whose books it 
frequently occurs, as it does also in 
those of Kings, the Psalms, and most 
of the minor prophets, but with un- 
usual frequency in Isaiah, Jeremiah, 
and Zechariah. See Buxt. Concord. 
The position of Lowth, Hitzig, and 


others, that 5 mm is an ellipsis for 
ΓΊΝΩ ox m7, is overturned by the 
simple fact, that Ov7>x itself, as a pro- 
per name, is likewise exhibited in the 
absolute, and not in the construct 
form, which we should otherwise have 
expected: Ps. lix. 6; Ixxx. 5,8, 15, 20; 
Ixxxiv. 9. To elude the difficulty, in 
this case, it has been proposed to sup- 


of the form 8 m7, together with the 
circumstance, that other instances of 
proper names in a state of construc- 
tion occur, it is preferable to regard 
such forms as relics of a ruder and 
more primitive usage, as 123 DPX, 2 
Kings iii. 4; yo) ov, Isa. xxx. 20; 
nox oor, Jer. x. 10. (Ewald, § 515.) 


ff 
The combination, $ wx TIM, occurs 
only once in Isaiah, and a few times in 
Jeremiah. A still fuller form, how- 
ever, is employed by Amos, iii. 13 ; 
MNT ox AP 2. Aq. κύριος στρα- 
recov ; Symm. δυνάμεων. The LXX. 
in Isaiah uniformly render, κύριος 
σαβαώθ; in the other books, κύριος 
παντοκράτωρ, is the phrase chiefly em- 
ployed. Both forms are copied in the 
N. T. The title imports the supre- 
macy of Jehovah over the angels and 
all the planetary systems, and seems 
to have been designed to vindicate to 
him the honours which were idola- 
trously paid to the heavenly bodies, 
by those, who on this account, were 


called by the Arabs, we Sabii, 


CHAP. I.] 


ISAIAH. 9 


10 Hear the word of Jehovah, ye judges of Sodom! 
Hearken to the law of our God, ye people of Gomorrah ! 
11 What is the multitude of your sacrifices to me? saith Jehovah. 
I am satiated with burnt-offerings of rams, 
And with the fat of fed beasts : 
And in the blood of bullocks, and of lambs, and of goats, 


I take no delight. 


12 When ye come to appear before me, 
Who hath required you to tread my courts ? 


i.e. worshippers of the celestial hosts. 
Michaelis, Suppl. ad Lex. Heb. No. 
2107. The >in OY) is intensive. 

10. The prophet having finished his 
picture of the deplorably reduced cir- 
cumstances of the Jews, avails himself 
of the allusion which he had made to 
Sodom and Gomorrah in the preceding 
verse in order to apply the subject 
with more point to his auditors. By 
a spirited apostrophe, he invests them 
with the character which they had 
been accustomed to regard as peculiar 
to the abandoned inhabitants of those 
cities. Their guilt was great, and 
merited condign punishment. Comp. 
Jer, xxiii. 14 - Matt. xi. 23, 24; Ezek. 
xvi. 48; Rey. xi. 8.—7z?, a magistrate 


or judge. Arab. oh, kadi. Gesenius 


appropriately quotes here the Arabic 
proverb :— 


pre 28 ure ye 
“More unjust than a judge of Sodom.” 


721 and ΠῚ occur often, as here, for 
divine doctrine or instruction in 
general. The latter word is derived 
from ΠῚ), to throw, throw out the hand ; 
in Hiph. to point, guide, direct. 

11. From this verse, to the 15th 
inclusive, the Jews are taught the 
spiritual import of the ™in, daw, to 
which their attention had just been 
called, ver. 10 ; and the inconsistency, 
inutility, and guilt of occupying them- 
selves with external forms of religion, 
while they evinced no true penitence, 
or moral reformation, are strikingly 
pressed upon them. Comp. 1 Sam. 
xv. 22; Ps. 1. 7—15; Amos v. 21—24, 
The reference in 0273ry) is not so 


much, perhaps, to the numerous sacri- 
fices prescribed in the Mosaic insti- 
tute, as to the voluntary multiplication 
of them by the Jews, in the time of 
the prophet, with a view to avert the 
Divine wrath. According to Josephus, 
the number of lambs of one year old, 
sacrificed at the Passover only, under 
Cestius, amounted to 256,500. The 
mas. gender is observed throughout 
the enumeration, in strict accordance 
with the command, that the animals 
for sacrifice should all be males. 
Levit. i. 3, 10. 

12. 22 τιν, contracted for*227ny Γῆν τ᾽, 
to present or make one s-self visible before 
God ; i.e. in the temple, the residence " 
of his glory. The naked form, *3, is 
precisely that which occurs Exod. xxiii. 
15 ; where it is first ordained that the 
Israelites should present themselves 
with gifts and sacrifices at the three 
great festivals, and is that used by 
David, in reference to his appearing 
in the temple, Ps. xlii. 3. 2578 and 
Ox are otherwise employed. One 
MS. reads nis}, ¢o see, but erroneously, 
though not on the ground assigned by 
Gesenius, that the phrase, seeing God, 
as Ps. xi. 7; xvii. 15, cannot well be 
understood, except of the beatific 
vision ; for the Psalmist indisputably 
uses it, when speaking of his beholding 
the glory of God in the temple, Ps. 
lxili, 2—o3, lit. from your hand, a 
common Hebraism after verbs of de- 
manding, to express from you: the 


-pronoun here is emphatic.—0d), fo 


tread,—a term of contempt purposely 
borrowed from the action of the cattle 
brought into the outer court for sacri- 
fice. The attendance of the Jews in 
the other court was, in a spiritual 
point of view, no better. 


10 


18 Bring no more vain oblation ; 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. I. 


Incense is an abomination to me, 
The new-moon also, the sabbath, and the calling of assemblies ; 
I cannot endure wickedness, and days of restraint. 


14 
They are a burden upon me ; 
I am weary of bearing them. 
15 


Your new-moons and your stated festivals my soul hateth ; 


When also ye spread open your hands, 


I will hide mine eyes from you ; 


13. XY in ΝΥ ΤΠ) may refer either 
to the worthlessness and inutility of 
the oblations presented, or to the in- 
sincerity of the worshippers. The 
one is indeed included in the other ; 
but the latter idea seems better to 
accord with the spirit of the passage. 
— 78 is supposed by some to be an 
ellipsis of nev? °nx ; but >, related as 
it is to 3, to hold, contain, signifies 
by itself, to dear or endure, Ps. ci. 5. 
xq NP, lit. fo call a convocation, not 
“to read the Scripture,” as some have 
thought. The form, however, is the 
infin. constr. and must be rendered 
by the calling of. The phrase is founded 
on the circumstance of certain solemn 
feasts having been ushered in by public 
proclamation. Though 8772, and the 
two preceding substantives, are masc., 
they are nevertheless to be understood 
as referred to in the predicate 89 ΠΕΡῚ, 
which could not be repeated. 27x? 
are properly separated by the Zakeph- 
katon from the preceding words, and 
stand in immediate connexion with 
the following M21 }}8, which emphati- 
cally teaches the impossibility of any 
religious services being acceptable to 
God, while iniquity is not hated and 
forsaken. The impenitent Jews sought 
to combine both ; just as men in all 
ages, and in connexion with every 
system of religion, have been prone 
to imagine that the observance of 
outward rites would atone for the 
guilt of sin. Comp. Jer. vii. 8—10. 
My? signifies restraint or abstinence from 
labour, in order to keep a festival, and 
metonymically an assemb/y met under 
such circumstances. Comp. the Arab. 


ye cohibuit, retinuit, &c. Gesenius 


attempts in vain to make it primarily 


mean an assembly. Nothing can be 
more forced than his reference to 
1 Sam. xxi. 8, in proof of his signif. 
No. 3, in Niph. ps the LXX. render 
νηστεῖα, as if OY had stood in their 
copy, but it is unsupported by any 
other authority. Lowth’s reasons in 
its favour are precisely those which 
render it critically suspicious. 

14. By 0-77 we are not to under- 
stand any monthly festivals different 
from that of the new-moon, expressed 
in the singular form 77 in the fore- 
going verse ; just as DPI compre- 
hends all the other feasts there distri- 
butively mentioned. The commence- 
ment of this verse is nothing more 
than an epanalepsis, or resumption of 
what had been there introduced, in 
order to expatiate upon it, and give it 
greater effect—m9, which occurs as a 
noun only here and Deut. i. 12, the 
cognate verb once, Job xxxvii. 11, 
seems chosen in order forcibly to ex- 
press what causes fatigue or molesta- 
tion, as a weight, burden, &c.; but the 
emphasis of the passage is greatly in- 
creased by the prep. 7%, xpox, which 
indicates the continued pressure of 
the painful annoyance. The idea is 
beautifully carried out in the con- 
cluding words of the verse, where the 


_reciprocal form of the verb indicates 


self-exhaustion in the effort to perform 
any action. The whole passage is 
strongly anthropopathical. 

15. The extension of the hands to- 
wards heaven was a very usual and a 
most appropriate gesture in prayer. 
See 1 Kings viii. 38, 54; 1 Tim. ii. 8; 
and Wets. or Bloomf. Synop. on the 
latter passage. The Heb. phrase Ὁ: 
02, however, refers rather to the 
spreading open of the palms of the 


CHAP. I.] 


ISATAH. 


11 


Even though ye multiply prayers, I will not hear : 


- Your hands are full of blood. 
16 Wash ye; purify yourselves ; 


Remove your wicked practices from before my eyes ; 


Cease to do evil: 
17 Learn to do well; 


Seek justice ; right the oppressed ; 
Maintain the cause of the orphan; plead for the widow. 


hands when extended, than to the 
extension of the hands themselves, 
though this is necessarily included. 


“Tngemit, et duplices tendens ad sidera 
palmas.’—VirG. 4neid. lib. 1. 1. 98. 


—In 7%n 1am may be included the 
Barrodoyia which our Lord condemns, 
and for which the Jews appear ever 
to have been notorious. Nothing 
could be more incongruous than to 
spread open to the view of Holy 
Omniscience, hands which had been 
stained by acts of atrocious wicked- 
ness. Hence the practice, to which 
allusion is made in the following verse, 
of washing the hands before engaging 
in prayer—an illusion which also holds 
in regard to ὁσίους χεῖρας, 1 Tim. ii. 8. 
The last clause of the verse is a prosa- 
podosis, in which the reason isassigned 
why their services were rejected. It 
is noticeable that while the other 
verbs in this verse are future in signi- 
fication, the last, 1899, is in the prete- 
rite, to indicate the habitual cruelty in 
which the Jews of that age indulged. 
Gesen. Lehrg. § 205. 3.6. 027 in the 
plural, 4loods, is generally used of 
murders to express the aggravated 
atrocity of the crime. 

The specification of the entire ser- 
vice of the Jews, ver. 12—15, was 
intended to produce the conviction, 
that no part of it was acceptable to 
God, whatever relative importance 
they might attach to it, while they 
persevered in a course of transgres- 
sion,—a great moral truth applicable 
to mankind in all ages. 

16, 17. Though divided both in the 
original, and in the versions, these 
verses are most intimately connected 
by the identity of the forms, and the 
directness of the contrast: Ὁ Ὑ7---- 


ΔΙΌ ὑπο, They introduce a series of 
appropriate expostulations, couched 
partly in figurative, partly in literal 
terms.— 217, Gesenius and Hendewerk 
take for the Hithp. 3377, the n being 
suppressed before the sibilant, which 
makes the compensation by the Dagesh 
forte. Hitzig considers it to be the 
Niph. of 73, which is preferable, as 
the proper Hithp. of 733 would be 
mam. The remark of this writer, that 
there are no instances of Hithp. in 
verbs having 1 for their first radical 
is important.—yioy nex. Gesenius, 
Winer, Ewald, Hitzig, and other 
moderns, render yi07 actively, consi- 
dering it to be equivalent to the 
Benon. part. y27; though Gesenius 
allows, in his later works, that the 
form here employed being intransitive, 
the word may be taken in a passive 
sense, which, indeed, the connexion 
absolutely requires. LXX. ῥύσασθε 
ἀδικούμενον, and so the Chal., Syr., 
Vulg.,Saad., and Jewish Span. Kimchi 
also renders it 319, not %3,as Gesenius 
represents it in his Comment. The 
Rabbi explains the meaning by re- 
ferring to Ps. xxi. 4; but he gives the 
sense of the passage thus: NTH Ὁ Nw 
ws nv dn, “Direct him who is 
robhed and wronged in his judgment.” 
Though the root primarily signifies to 
be sour, acid, the idea of corrupt, 
suggested by Bochart, and adopted by 
Lowth, Dathe, (emendate quod cor- 
ruptum est,) and others, does not suit, 
as indeed Lowth himself felt; but 
that of violence, which, in common 
with its cognate Ddq, it obviously 
conveys, is fully warranted ws wy, 
to be erect, straight, right, has, in Piel, 
the causative signification, ¢o make or 
place erect, to cause to walk right ; hence 
to lead, guide. It here specifically 


12 


18 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. I. 


Come now, let us reason with each other, saith Jehovah : 


Though your sins be like scarlet, they shall be white as snow ; 
Though they be red as crimson, they shall be like wool. 


19 If ye be willing and obey, 


Ye shall consume the best of the land ; 


20 But if ye refuse and rebel, 


Ye shall be utterly consumed by the sword. 
For the mouth of Jehovah hath spoken it. 


signifies to raise the afflicted from his 
state of depression under the violent 
hand of his enemy, to see him righted 
as to his place in society, to restore 
him to circumstances of prosperity. 
The uncommon frequency with which 
the cases of the orphan and widow 
are taken up in the Old Testament, 
evinces the high degree of importance 
attached to this branch of Hebrew 
ethics. 

18. A remarkable instance of gracious 
condescension on the part of Jehovah, 
designed to afford the utmost en- 
couragement to penitent and return- 
ing sinners. Gesenius, after Michaelis, 
Koppe, and Eichhorn, supposes that 
the passage refers not to pardon, but 
to judgment, though he construes it 
differently ; but the passages which 
he adduces are by no means parallel, 
and the verbs employed are ™ and 
wp, not m2, which the prophet here 
uses, and which signifies to argue a 
point, reason, a8 well as to punish. It 
is used in a kind sense, as the con- 
nexion shews. Comp. the beautiful 
parallel, chap. xliii. 26, where even 
ὭΒ occurs in the same signification. 
Jewish Span. contrastemonos. — 7%, 
prop. garments of scarlet colour, from 
γῦ, a colour obtained from the coccus 
licis of Linnzeus—an insect which 
deposits its eggs in the leaves of the 
quercus cocciferus, found in Spain, and 
other countries bordering on the 
Mediterranean. It was greatly in 
request by the ancients, who prepared 
from it a deep scarlet, or beautiful 
crimson dye, somewhat resembling 
that which is now obtained from the 
coccus cacti, or the cochineal insect. 


It is called by the Arabs Leys 
kermes; (in the Jewish Span. οἱ car- 


mesi;) hence our “crimson.” From 
the similarity of the word to ποῦ, 
which signifies fo repeat, or do a thing 
a second time, some have supposed, that 
double-dyed crimsons or purples are 
meant: a supposition which derives 
some support from the dis tincta, and 
dibapha of the Roman writers ; and 
from the διπλοῦν of the LXX. Exod. 
xxv. 4; and the δίβαφον of Symm. 
Exod. xxviii. 8, where the Vulg. has 
bistinctum. In the present passage, 
the LXX. render it φοινικοῦν, which 
Hesych. interprets πυῤῥὸν, κόκκινον, 
αἱματώδες ; but which is properly to 
be explained from the circumstance, 
that it formed a celebrated article of 
Phenician commerce. The  corre- 
sponding term YA signifies a worm, 
and denotes the insect itself, from 
which the colour was obtained. It is 
here used merely for variety of ex- 
pression. The two words are found 
together : ‘20 nyAn, Exod. xxv. 4: and 
nyain 20, Lev. xiv. 4. With the Jews 
white was the symbol of purity ; red, 
of crime, especially of cruelty and 
murder. 

19, 20. The rhythmus and antithesis 
in these verses are exquisite. ὮΝ 
might, in the former instance, be 
rendered enjoy, as Luther gives it; 
but as it is employed in the latter 
with evident reference to its previous 
occurrence, consume is more appro- 
priate. 28m is intensively, and not 
causatively passive, as Gesenius would 
have it. Supply ἃ before 7. The 
interpretation of Hitzig: “ye shall 
be compelled to devour the sword,” 
i.e. by receiving it into your vitals, 
is violent, and quite repugnant to 
Scripture usage. See Deut, xxxii. 42; 
2 Sam. 11. 26, 


CHAP. I.] 


ISAIAH. 


13 


21 Ah! how is she become an harlot—the faithful city ! 


She that was full of justice ! 


Righteousness dwelt in her, but now murderers ! 


22 Thy silver is become dross ; 


Thy liquor is weakened with water ; 

23 Thy princes are rebellious, and associates of thieves ; 
Every one of them loveth a bribe, and pursueth rewards ; 
They maintain not the cause of the orphan ; 

And the cause of the widow reacheth them not. 

24 Hence the announcement of the Lord, 


21. The prophet again depicts the 
corrupt state of the metropolis ; con- 
trasts its present moral degradation 
with the high and honourable character 
which it had formerly sustained ; and 
denounces the wrath of God against 
the finally impenitent. 77982 has 
special reference to fidelity in the 
worship and service of the true God, 
and 7 to the idolatrous practices 
which obtained in the days of Ahaz. 
Such practices were a breach of the 
matrimonial bond into which the 
nation had symbolically entered with 
Jehovah. The Jod in ‘D8? is usually 
called paragogic, but seems rather to 
be the relic of an ancient mode of 
expressing the status constructus, or, as 
Ewald. § 406, terms it, a union-vowel. 
It occurs very rarely in prose, and 
then only in the first four books of 
the Pentateuch; but it is more fre- 
quent in poetry, and vefy common in 
proper names, as P1Z7379, 27T3Y, Ke. 

22. oD, the recedanea, or scorie 
which separates from metal in a state 
of fusion, or the baser metal thus 
detached from it when smelted. The 
metallurgic art appears to have been 
cultivated at a very early period. 
Numerous traces of it occur in the 
Scriptures—many of them indicating 
a considerable degree of proficiency.— 
820, the LXX. and Symm. οἶνός ; Aq. 
συμπόσιον. ‘This substantive, and the 
verb from which it is derived, are 
only used in poetical or prophetical 
composition, and unequivocally convey 
the idea of inebriating liquor, or liquor, 
the drinking of which freely in its 
pure state would produce intoxication. 
It is used in this place, to express the 


idea of purity or genuineness, in which 
alone its potency lay; though, per- 
haps, not exclusive of an implied 
reference to the abuse of it.—79, lit. 
cut, wounded, killed with water. The 
word occurs only in this place ; but 
is quite in keeping with similar modes 
of expression among the Arabs, as 
may be seen in Gesen. Comment. in 
loc. “Vinum aqua secare est phrasis 
orientalis, vinum aqua miscere indi- 
cans.” —Dathe. The lexicographers 
compare it with 0, to circumcise ; 
with which the German weiz taufen, 
to baptize wine, is singularly parallel 
as it respects the religious rites from 
which the phraseology is borrowed. 
Both members of the verse express 
the deterioration which had taken 
place in the state and character of 
the Jews. 

23, DMD PW, a paronomasia, which 
also occurs Hos. ix.15; and in sound, 
though not in sense, Jer. vi. 28.— 
Ὁ is not used elsewhere, but is 
introduced as a parallel to Mw, LXX. 
ἀνταπόδημα ; Symm. ἀμοιβάς. 

24, NT ON? A solemn and em- 
phatic mode of expression, admirably 
adapted, in connexion with the follow- 
ing accumulation of Divine appella- 
tives, to excite attention to the decla- 
ration they were intended to introduce. 
ἘΝ, cognate with 0m}, to ery aloud, 
roar, as the lion, the sea, &c., is the 
Pah. construct, and signifies what has 
been solemnly or oracularly announced. - 
Hence the idiomatic phrase, Jer. xxiil. 
31, Dx? wR, “and solemnly pro- 
nounce: the oracle of,” where there 
is a singular beauty in the suppression 
of the Divine name, since what the 

B 


14 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. I, 


Jehovah of Hosts, the Protector of Israel: 
Ha! I will be relieved from my adversaries ; 
I will be avenged of my enemies. 

25 But I will again turn my hand towards thee, 
And will smelt away thy dross as with potash, 


And take away all thine alloy. 


false prophets pretended to deliver 
had not proceeded from Jehovah, but 
was the mere invention of their own 
brain.—ji7x. Some regard the subst. 
Ts, @ base or pedestal, as the root of 
this word; but the more natural 
derivation is that adopted by the most 
distinguished Heb. scholars for the 
last century, which refers it to p7 or 
T7, to exercise power or authority, subju- 
gate, judge. When used, as here, 
with the article, as also without it in 
elevated poetry, Ps. cxiv. 7, the word 
is taken absolutely to designate Jeho- 
vah as the Supreme Judge or Universal 
Governor. It is applied in the same 
sense to the Messiah, Mal. iii. 1. 25x, 
the plural form absolute, is likewise 
used exclusively of God. Gen. xix. 
18, forms no exception: the pause 
accent there requiring the Patach to 
be changed into Kametz; so that, 
though the form of the Divine name 
is exhibited, which led the Masoretes 
to mark it 7p, it is in reality the 
simple plural, with the pronominal 
affix, as in ver. 2. To further distin- 
guish Jehovah from all other rulers, 
he is styled yw jx. VIX occurs 
only here in construction with os, 
and five times besides in construction 
with apm. It is derived from 72x, an 
intransitive verb, not in use, but cog- 
nate with 732Y, to pass over, 152, to be 
over, cover, and signifying to cover, 
protect, defend ; hence 738, and πὰς, 
wing Or pinion, from the protection 
which it affords. The meaning of the 
phrase 2 & Vis is, therefore, the Pro- 
tector of Israel—omw. This is one 
of those Heb. verbs which are so 
pregnant with meaning as to convey 
even contrary ideas. It is properly 
expressive of strong emotion, and the 
mental relief or enjoyment which 
results from an effort to give vent to 
it. With respect to one’s own actions, 
it signifies to grieve or repent ; with 


respect to those of others, to inflict 
punishment, avenge one’s self upon 
them. In both cases the mind is 
eased of the annoyance which blame- 
worthy conduct has occasioned to it. 
It also signifies to exercise pity or 
compassion towards suffering, because 
of the effect of such exercise upon 
one’s own mind. God is here repre- 
sented anthropopathically as deter- 
mined no longer to be vexed, or 
offended by the conduct of his enemies, 
but to obtain relief from the burden 
which it imposed, by removing them 
from the scene of action ; or so affect- 
ing them by his judgments, as to 
deprive them of the opportunity of 
insulting him. See the beautiful note 
of Lowth on the passage.—The 7 in 
mp is the sign of the elongated 
Future, indicating a fixed determina- 
tion to effect the action expressed. 
25. by VY ΠΤ is used in a hostile 
sense, Ps. Ixxxi. 15; Amos i. 8; but 
the connexion shews that the phrase 
is here to be taken in a good sense, 
as pointing out the return of the 
divine favour—though that favour 
could only be restored by an exertion 
of power in removing the causes of 
indignation,—33, as with potash: Jew- 
ish Span.-como wabon. 3 for 33, as freq. 
1a, a vegetable salt obtained from the 
ashes of the /ali, or soap-plant, of 
which Forskal found several kinds in 
Egypt and Arabia: hence the Arabic, 


\all, Alkali, adopted into our west- 


ern languages. It is the same article, 
otherwise called ™3, and was used, 
not only in cleansing cloth, or washing 
the body, but also, as appears from 
this passage, in purifying metals; 
causing the different parts to separate 
more readily from each other. Thus 
the Chald.; but the other ancient 
versions simply express the idea of 
purity—the effect for the cause. Bo- 


CHAP. I.] 


ISAIAH. 15 


26 And I will restore thy judges as at the first, 
And thy counsellors as at the beginning ; 


After this, they shall call thee, 


The city of righteousness, the faithful state. 

27 Zion shallbe delivered through justice, 
And her converts through righteousness. 

28 But the destruction of the rebels and the sinners shall be together ; 
And those who forsake Jehovah shall perish. ‘ 

29 For ye shall be ashamed of the terebinths in which ye delighted, 
And blush for the gardens which ye had chosen. . 


chart. ii. 43.—>y72, any base admixture 
of lead, tin, or other impure metal’ 
found in silver ore. It derives its 
name from its being separated (513) 
from it in the process of smelting. 
26. The restoration of righteous 
judges and counsellors was to be ef- 
fected by the removal of those who 
were corrupt, and the creation of such 
as answered to the character originally 
prescribed in the law. ΠΡ, which is 
seldom used, except in the poetical or 
prophetical books of Scripture, is 
synonymous with vy, It is derived 
from MR, 82, to fall in with, meet ; Arab. 


VB, collegit, hospitium excepit, in urbe 
urbs, Heb. and 


Punic, ΠΣ; and properly signifies a 
place of meeting, where there is an 
assemblage of persons, and where 
strangers may expect to meet with 
hospitality, Gen. xix. 1,2, In 72 ΝῊ, 
is a common Hebraism, according to 
which, a person is said fo be called 
what he really 7s; so that, “thou shalt 
be called” is equivalent to, “thou shalt 
be.” This idiom, though more fre- 
quently occurring in Isaiah, is not 
peculiar to him. See the parallel pas- 
sage, Zech. vi. 3. In all such cases, 
the name specified is not a xomen 
proprium, but a predicate of certain 
properties or qualities distinguishing 
the object named. 

27. Since the inhabitants of Zion 
are not described in this chapter, as 
having been carried into exile, 72% is 
not to be translated, ἡ αἰχμαλωσία 
αὐτῆς, her captives, as in the LXX., but 
as Jarchi gives it; T2wn wv, “those 


vivit; hence, 9,3, 


who repent.” 2% signifies, in such 
connexion, to turn to God in the way 
of genuine conversion. The converts 
of Zion were her inhabitants, con- 
sidered as recovered to the true wor- 
ship and service of God. 

28, 29. DxwM OYE denote the oppo- 
site characters to 72, in the preceding 
verse—impenitent and obstinate trans- 
gressors. The change of person in 
Hebrew poetry is very common; so 
that, though Kennicott’s Codices, 150, 
182, and De Rossi’s 226, originally, 
together with Munster’s printed edi- 
tion of 1536, the Chaldee Paraphrase, 
and the version of Saadias, read 717, 
“ Ye shall be ashamed,” it is not at all 
improbable that x, the reading of 
the Textus Receptus, is genuine; and 
to alter it simply on such authorities 
as those just mentioned, would be 
unwarrantable. At the same time, 
since the third persons of verbs are 
often used impersonally, this verb may 
be considered as subordinated to those 
which follow, and translated accord- 
ingly, as I have done in the version. 
To avoid the harshness, the LXX. and 
Syr. throw onyer into the third person, 
—o’?x, to correspond to ni:7, in the 
second member of the verse, must be 
interpreted, ¢erebinth, or oak - groves; 
which places, as well as gardens, while 
they afforded shelter from the burning 
heat of the sun, were peculiarly favour- 
able to the obscene practices connected 
with idolatrous worship. They were 
accordingly selected for the purpose, 
not only by the ancient idolaters in 
Pheenicia, Syria, and other parts of the 
East, but in Germafiy, Britain, &c. 
though the superstitions in the colder 


10 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. I. 


30 For ye shall be as a terebinth whose leaves wither ; 
And as a garden in which is no water. 
31 The powerful man shall become tow, 


And his work a spark of fire ; 


They shall both burn together, 
And no one shall quench them. 


climates of Europe may not have been 
marked by the same degrees of licen- 
tiousness.—It has been contested, 
whether by the 7x,is to be understood 
the ¢erebinth, or turpentine-tree, or the 
oak, It takes its name from its strength 
and hardness. The LXX. render it 
τερέβινθος, Gen. xiv. 6; but Aq.,Symm., 
and Theod. have δρῦς, which the LXX. 
frequently employ as a translation of 
the kindred word 7x, substituted for 
it in the next verse. According to 
Gesenius--Aristotle, Theophrastus, and 
Pliny, describe the Terebinth as an 
evergreen—a quality which would suit 
ver. 30; but the fact is denied by 
modern botanists. Lowth, unable to 
make up his mind, either to terebinth 
or oak, renders the words by ‘lez, 
which is a species of the latter. The 
truth of the matter seems to be, that 
the Hebrews used it to designate the 
Pistacia Terebinthus of Linn.; while 
they appropriated js and 7x to the 
oak, in supporting whichappropriation, 
all the ancient versions agree: though, 
in the present case, Aq., Symm., and 


Theod. have εἰδώλων : taking the word 
to be >8, which is used both of the 
true God, and of any false divinity. 
The Arabs call it the Butm-tree. For 
a description of it, see Dr. Robinson’s 
Biblical Researches, vol. iii. p. 15. 

30. Nothing could more strikingly 
typify the destitute and forlorn con- 
dition of the ungodly, in their circum- 
stances of destruction, than the faded 
terebinth, and gardens without any 
supply of water.—For 79, the singular, 
nearly fifty MSS. and eight editions 
read in the plural 7%. 

31. OD, powerful, great in might or 
riches. Some interpret this of τοί, 
and their worshippers, but less aptly. 
The word seems to be used to denote 
the influential characters in the Jewish 
state, whose wicked deeds had plunged 
it into such dire calamities. Both they 
and the objects of their idolatrous 
worship should now be consumed 
together. ‘9b, dis work, is here equi- 
valent to "7 Mwy, the work of his hands, 
i.e. his idols, ch, ii, 8; xxxvil. 19, 


——— 


CHAPTERS .——IV. 


That these chapters form one connected whole, has been admitted by most 
expositors. It was reserved for Koppe, Eichhorn, and Bertholdt, to break 
them up into minute fractions; but the unsuccessful results of their efforts 
have cured the mania for critical operations of this description, which raged 
for a time in Germany. Jahn, Déderlein, and Hitzig, inciude also the fifth 
chapter in the discourse; yet, with the exception of Déderlein, they consider 
it to be so far distinct, as claiming to be regarded in the light of a second 
division of it. Gesenius treats them as altogether separate discourses. 

The time when this discourse was delivered seems plainly determinable, by the 
political and moral traits which it exhibits, 'The flourishing state of com- 
merce; the importation of the precious metals from the East; their great 


CHAP. II.] 


ISAIAH. 17 
abundance; the introduction of foreign manners, especially idolatry; and 
the luxury and finery which prevailed ; seem all to agree with the commence- 
ment of the reign of Ahaz. For the conducting of these several items to 
the pitch which they then reached, ample provision had been made, by the 
reopening of the port of Elath, under Uzziah, 2 Kings xiv. 22; his increase 
of military prowess, and his success, 2 Chron. xxvi. 6—15; and the prospe- 
rous eareer of Jotham, 2 Chron. xxvii.3—6. The strong features of idolatry 
which the prophet exhibits, entirely militate against the hypothesis of this 
section having been delivered in the time of Uzziah. In part of that of 
Jotham, matters greatly deteriorated ; but it was not till Ahaz ascended the 
throne, that the door was opened for the entrance of all kinds of wickedness 
and abomination, 


CHAPTER II. 


The prophet commences with a lucid prediction of the establishment of 


Messiah’s kingdom, and its happy results, 1—5; he then depicts the awful 
apostasy and idolatry of the Jews in the times immediately following his 
own, 6—9; denounces the divine judgment against the different classes of 
the people, 10—17; predicts the utter abolition of idolatry, 18—21; and 


closes with an exhortation to withhold all confidence in man, 22. 


1 THe things which Isaiah, the son of Amoz, saw, concerning 


Judah and Jerusalem. 


2 In the last of the days, the mountain of Jehovah’s house 
Shall be established on the summit of the mountains, 


1, 127 has the signification of thing 
or matter, as well as that of word, and 
especially, in such connexion, a thing 
or things forming the subject matter 
of divinely oracular communication. Ver- 
bum pro divino responso et oraculo. 
4winglius. Most modern translators 
render the term, by prophecy ; but then 
they are obliged to give m1, by was re- 
vealed, which is an unnecessary liberty. 
Every difficulty is removed by the lite- 
ral translation given in the version. 
More things than one being intended, 
127 may be regarded as a collective 
noun. 

2—4, This passage, with a few 
verbal differences, being also found 
Micah iv. 1—3, it has been matter of 
dispute, to which of the two prophets 
belongs the claim of originality; and 


some have even maintained, that it 
contains the words of a third and more 
ancient prophet, which both Isaiah and 
Micah adopted on different occasions. 
This hypothesis, however, is quite un- 
necessary : nor is it of any consequence 
which of the prophets first delivered 
the prediction. They were contem- 
poraries, and the one may have heard 
the other,—a supposition which will 
account for the discrepancies between 
them, in point of phraseology, much 
better than the theory, that one of 
them copied the passage from the 
written prophecy of the other. τ 
2. The phrase, 027 M7¥, which, in 
itself signifies, remote future time inde- 
finitely, has, in the prophets, a more 
determinate reference; viz. to the last 
period of the divine dispensations, the 


18 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. 11. 


And shall be elevated above the hills, 
And all the nations shall flow to it. 
3 Yea, many people shall go and say ; 
Come, let us go up to the mountain of Jehovah, 
To the house of the God of Jacob; 
That he may teach us his ways; 
And that we may walk in his paths. 
For out of Zion shall go forth the law, 
And the word of Jehovah from Jerusalem. 


time of the Christian economy. Comp. 
Jer. xxii. 20; xxx. 24; Dan, x. 14; 
Hos. iii. 5. Hence the current Jewish 
interpretation: way nim, the days of 
Messiah,—the time when he should 
appear, and during which his kingdom 
should endure; of which, Kimchi and 
other rabbins consider the present 
passage to be clearly predictive. Abar- 
banel says expressly, ΤΡ NVI? PHD 1 N'7, 
“it belongs without doubt to the days 
of the Messiah.” Mashm. Hayeshuah, 
fol. 8. col 1. LUXX. ἐν ταῖς ἐσχάταις 
ἡμέραις, Which is either adopted or 
imitated in the N. T. Acts 11.17; Heb. 
i. 1; 1 Pet. i. 20. The mountains and 
hills cannot here be literally under- 
stood of Zion, Lebanon, Tabor, Gilead, 
&c. since the elevation of the former 
of these mountains above the others, 
or rather its transposition to be firmly 
based upon their summits, would argue 
a physical convulsion too violent and 
absurd in its phenomena to be for a 
moment admitted. In the symbolical 
diction of prophecy, mountains betoken 
commanding or governing powers, or 
governments and systems, political and 
ecclesiastical. In a religious point of 
view, the phraseology may be based 
upon the fact, that altars and temples, 
the central points of idolatrous wor- 
ship, were constructed on elevated 
localities. The establishment, there- 
fore, of Zion upon the tops of the 
mountains, and its paramount eleva- 
tion, refer to the superior position 
which the church of God was to 
assume, in relation to the different 
systems of false religion; the influ- 
ence which she was to exert upon 
them, and her permanent duration, 
chap. xi. 9; Dan. ii. 35; Rev. xvi. 20. 
—, to flow as a river, is beautifully 


descriptive of a long and continuous 
mass of human beings collected from 
different quarters, and moving forward 
in procession towards some point of 
common interest.—Instead of YX, 
Micah has YY, which is the more 
definite, and, on this account, more 
probably the later in its composition. 
—oinr2 points out the universal 
character of the Christian dispensa- 
tion. Instead of the Jewish males 
going up thrice in the year to Jerusa- 
lem, andindividual proselytes repairing 
thither from thesurrounding countries, 
the great mass of the population of the 
globe would abandon their supersti- 
tions, and enter the church of God. 
3. The same idea of universality is 
prosecuted in this verse, with a decla- 
ration of the object which the converts 
would have in view, in repairing to the 
church, and the means by which their 
conversion should be effected. The 
prefixed to the futures, 7223, 1%, and 
7272 occurring after 3°), a verb in the 
imperative mood, is not merely copu- 
lative, but marks the ends or events 
to which the action expressed by that 
verb was to be introductory. 727, when 
used as here in the imperative, is a 
formula of exhortation or excitement, 
and though strictly meaning to go, 
proceed in any direction, is more 
appropriately rendered into English 
by come. Gesen. Lehrgeb. p. 873.— 
The synonymes JJ, and Mk, like odds, 
Acts ix. 2; xix. 9, 23; 2 Pet. ii. 2; and 


the Arab. al Cow, Cow, in the 


Koran, signify religion, religious prin- 
ciples, worship, and conduct.—» is not 
partitive here, as if only partial in- 
struction were to be obtained; but, 
after verbs of teaching, it indicates 


CHAP. II.] 


ISATAH. 


19 


4 And he shall arbitrate among the nations, 
And give decision to many people ; 
So that they shall beat their swords into coulters, 
And their spears into pruning-knives : 
Nation shall not raise a sword against nation, 
Neither shall they learn war any more. 


5 O house of Jacob! 


Come and let us walk in the light of Jehovah. 
6 Surely thou hast cast off thy people, the house of Jacob, 


the matter or subject, which the 
teaching has for its object.—If mn 
may be taken in its appropriated 
sense for the Old Testament revela- 
tion; the im 127 in the following 
hemistich will then signify the gospel, 
or the announcements of the New 
Testament, which are repeatedly called 
ὁ λόγος Tod κυρίου, as in Acts xix. 10; 
2 Thess. iii. 1. Both terms, however, 
may be descriptive of divine doctrine 
generally. This part of the prophecy 
received a literal fulfilment, when the 
apostles executed our Lord’s commis- 
sion, to go and teach “all nations, 
beginning at Jerusalem,” Luke xxiv. 47 ; 
but consistency of interpretation re- 
quires the term to be applied to the 
church, of which, at the time the 
prediction was uttered, and also in the 
apostolic age, Jerusalem was the cen- 
tral locality. It was from the church, 
and by the church, that the truth was 
to be propagated throughout the 
world; and to that church, in her 
universality, the nations were to come 
for instruction. 

4, Here the scene of Messiah’s reign 
is distinctly laid in the Gentile world ; 
where its influence was to be exten- 
sively felt, in the abolition of war, 
and the security enjoyed in cultivating 
the peaceful arts. To the description 
given by our prophet, Micah adds :— 


“And they shall sit, each under his 
vine, and under his fig-tree, 
And none shall make them afraid : 
For the mouth of Jehovah of hosts 
hath spoken it.”—Chap. iv. 4. 


Compare Martial, Epigr. xiv. 34; and 
for the reverse of the picture, Joel iv. 
10; Virg. Georg. i. 507 ; Ovid, Fast, 


i.699. The fulfilment of this predic- 
tion has hitherto only been partial, in 
consequence of the partial prevalence 
of the genuine spirit of the gospel ; 
but it is undeniable, that Christianity 
has greatly contributed to ameliorate 
the political condition of mankind, by 
diminishing the horrors of war, pro- 
moting useful intercourse, and ad- 
vancing the useful arts. Its plenary 
accomplishment is reserved for a 
period yet future, of the tranquillity 
and prosperity of which, the prophetic 
pages abound with the most glowing 
descriptions. The nominative to ew, 
&e. Kimchi and other rabbins admit 
to be the King Messiah. —DPx, on 
comparing 1 Sam. xiii. 20, obviously 
signify agricultural implementsofiron, 
and most probably the cow/fer, as there 
distinguished from 7772 and nv, 
implements similarly employed. The 
Jewish interpreters render the word 
by mattocks, which is supported by 
the version of Symmachus. Comp. 


however, the Arab. (#3), molle fuit 


(ferrum) ; (Ὁ, Οἱ» molle Serrum. 


5. Contains a spirited address to 
the Jews forthwith to avail themselves 
of the privileges which they enjoyed, 
lest, while these privileges were ex- 
tended to other nations, they might 
be deprived of them. iT ἦν, che light 
of Jehovah, is the instruction or know- 
ledge which he imparts. See ver. 3. 

6. The exigency of the place requires 
9 to be rendered surely or assuredly,— 
not for, which is quite foreign to the 
connexion. Contrasting the happiness 
which his people might enjoy, by 
walking in the paths of obedience, 
with their foreseen forlorn condition, 


20 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. IL. 


Because they are full of the East; 


They practise magic, like the 


Philistines, 


And strike hands with the sons of foreigners. 


Their land also is full of silver and gold ; 


And there is no end to their treasures. 
Yea, their land is full of horses, 
And there is no end to their chariots. 


the prophet abruptly changes the 
object of address, and appeals directly 
to Jehovah, who had brought his 
judgments upon them; and proceeds 
to point out the causes which had 
procured them. Nothing can be more 
violent than the interpretation of the 
Targum, Saadias, Michaelis, and Hitzig, 
according to which 37%" ΓΞ is to be 
considered as the vocative case, thus : 
“For thou hast left thy people, O 
house of Jacob!” Besides there being 
no parallel instance of such construc- 
tion, the frequent use of 2), the verb 
here employed, in connexion with m7, 
to express his abandonment of his 
people, shews, that it is to Him the 
address is directed. The 7 in πηι Ὁ), 
is not a contraction of ™, as Houbi- 
gant conjectures, but the fuller, though 
rarer form of the pronominal afforma- 
tive of the second pers. sing. mas. 
See Gen. ili. 12; Mal. 11. 14.--- 


meant, who taught the superstitions, 
and practised the sorceries of Syria 
and Babylon. The contrast, in point 
of locality, which is effected by this 
construction, evinces the impropriety 
of taking ἘΠῚ in the temporal sense, 
as the ancient versions do, as well as 
the conjecture of Brentius, adopted 
by several moderns, which would sub- 
stitute DDp2 for DIP. Lowth would 
unite both, and render, “ with divina- 
tion from the east :” but this is quite 
uncritical. The Hexaplar Syr. has 


La3Qe, Syria. For the Philistines, see 


chap. xiv. 29. That they were addicted 
to augury we learn 1 Sam. vi. 2. 
Whether 022% be descriptive of those 
who divined by observing the pheno- 
mena of the clouds (12%, @ cloud), or of 
those who employed ocular fascination, 


(ty, the eye,) we have no sufficient 
data according to which to determine. 
LXX. κληδονίζομαι, but also ὀρνιθο- 


σκοπέω, Ley, xix. 26. Syr. wah asd SO 3 


Vul. augures in general. Luth. Zage- 
wihler. Gesenius gives to the verb 
pe the signification of covering, and 
interprets the noun as denoting those 
who act covertly, who use covert arts. 
m723 "12, commonly 122 323, foreiguers, 
whom the Jews hired to divine for 
them, after the manner of the heathen. 
a pews, to make a bargain, or enter 
into an agreement by striking hands— 
a mode of contracting common in the 
. East, as it is in most nations. Hence 


the Arab. 432.0, complosio manuum, 


venditio, contractus, a settled bargain, 
effected in this way. The verb is 
nearly related to p20, frequently used 
for striking the hands together in 
token of joy, &c. and is found in this 
sense in thirty-one codices, Job xxvii. 
23. The Ὁ occurs in the present case 
in some MSS. and in the Soncin. 
edition. | 

7. This description of opulence and 
prowess would agree with the time of 
Uzziah, who had an army of 307,500 
men; but there is no reason to suppose 
that they diminished in the days of 
his son; and by the time Ahaz as- 
cended the throne, the evils which 
usually follow in their train, had 
greatly increased. The multiplication 
of horses, riches, &c. was expressly 
prohibited to the king, Deut. xvii. 16, 
17,—a prohibition, not, as Gesenius 
insinuates, of an equally late date with 
the practice of the Jewish monarchs, 
in procuring horses from Egypt, but 
originally inserted in the Jewish law 
by Moses, and prophetically indicative 
of their propensity to indulge in what 
had a natural tendency to alienate 


CHAP. 11] 


ISATAH. 


21 


8 Their land is full even of idols; 
They bow down to the work of their hands, 
To that which their fingers have made. 

9 The man of low condition is bowed down, 
And the man of rank is brought low ; 
And thou wilt by no means forgive them. 


10 


Enter the rock, and hide thee in the dust, 


From the fear of Jehovah, and from his glorious majesty. 


11 


The haughty eyes of man shall be brought low, 


And the loftiness of men shall be humbled, 
And Jehovah alone shall be exalted in that day. 


12 


For there is a day of Jehovah of hosts, 


Against every thing that is proud and lofty, 


their trust from God. As camels and 
asses were the animals used by the 
Hebrews for riding, horses were pro- 
cured for purposes of war. Comp. 
Proy. xxi. 31; Job xxxix. 19—25; 
Zech. x. 3. The mi33,2 were war- 
chariots, These were very common 
among the Canaanites and other neigh- 
bouring nations; and some of them 
being armed with iron scythes or 
hooks, currus fulcati, made terrible 
havoc among the ranks of the enemy. 

8. DYN, non-entities, 1. 6. idols, ficti- 
tious beings, destitute of all life and 
power, from x, xihili esse: most pro- 
bably in this case, as Vitringa remarks, 
teraphim, or household gods, whose 
idolatrous rites were celebrated in 
private, but not publicly tolerated 
till the accession of Ahaz. 

9. Though D078 and Wx are some- 
times mere synonymes, yet in passa- 
ges such as this, where the design of 
the writer is to describe different 
ranks of men, they are used by way 
of antithesis. Comp. Ps. xlix. 3; Is. 
v.15. lLuth. very expressively: “Da 
biickt sich der Pébel, da demiithigen 
sich die Junker.’ As all classes were 
addicted to false worship, the judg- 
ments of God would be universal. 
Considering that the idolaters had 
been accustomed to bow down before 
the objects of their adoration, there is 
@ singular propriety in the selection 
of the verbs here employed to express 
their punishment. They are repeated 
in verses 11, 12, and 17.--- τ xwn by) 


marks the strong conviction in the 
prophet’s mind, that merited punish- 
ment would be inflicted upon them. 
‘x, like the Greek μή, is used in sub- 
jective propositions to express the 
certainty of the negation, as it respects 
the person by whom it is uttered. 
‘Ewald’s Gram. § 573, Eng. Trans. 
The meaning is: that, how much 
soever the Jews were depressed by 
external calamities, these calamities 
should not be removed, but should 
still continue to weigh them down, as 
subjects of the divine indignation. 

10. Ὅν, lit. dust, but used here, as 
frequently in the poetical books, for 
yr. mim ap, the fear which the 
coming judgments of Jehovah inspire. 
One MS. supported by the LXX. and 
Arab. versions, adds, as in verses 19 
and 21: yyx2 yw? mp3, but it is evi- 
dently an emendation, and does not 
suit the present connexion. 

11. ‘90 should properly be in the 
plural, to agree with Ὁ, but it 15 in- 
fluenced by the attraction of the 
nearer noun Ὁ, as similar instances 
evince, The contrast between O78, 
Dx, and mim, is marked and striking. 

12, mi) dy, In the prophetical 
writings, the term oY is frequently 
employed to denote a period of divine 
judgment, Ezek. vii. 10; Joel i. 15; 
just as ἡμέρα τοῦ κυρίου is used in the 
N. T. for the day of judgment. 120 
and ny are similarly used. Hence the 
emphasis attaching to i777 DW, ver. 11. 
Ἐκείνη ἡ ἡμέρα, 2 Thess. 1. 10, ἕο. The 


σ 


22 


ISAIAH. 


{[CHAP. II. 


And against every thing that is elevated, 


And it shall be brought low. 
13 
That are lofty and elevated ; 


Against all the cedars of Lebanon, 


And against all the oaks of Bashan. 


14 


Against all the high mountains 
8 Ξ ᾽ 


And against all the elevated hills. 


15 Against every high tower, 


And against every fortified wall. 


? refers the judgment to Jehovah, as 
the author of its infliction. 

13—16, contain a specification of 
several of the most distinguished 
objects of nature and art, in order, 
metaphorically, to represent the dif- 
ferent persons or orders of men, 
elevated by the dignity of office, or 
rendered notable by their riches, or 
the elegance and luxury of their 
establishments, whom the judgments 
of God would, in a more remarkable 
manner, hurl into ruin. “They afford,” 
Lowth elegantly observes, “a striking 
example of that peculiar way of writing, 
which makes a principal characteristic 
of the parabolical or poetical style of 
the Hebrews, and in which their poets 
deal so largely; namely, their manner 
of exhibiting things divine, spiritual, 
moral, and political, by a set of images 
taken from things natural, artificial, 
‘religious, historical; in the way of 
metaphor, or allegory.” He proceeds 
to shew, that most of these are 
borrowed from nature, and that the 
Hebrew poetry is distinguished from 
all other poetry by its regular appro- 
priation of a certain set of such 
images to the explication of certain 
subjects; as the cedars of Lebanon, 
the oaks of Bashan, for kings, princes, 
&e.; mountains for kingdoms; towers 
for protectors, ἕο. Compare chap. x. 
33, 34; xiv. 8; xxx.25. The whole 
passage in the prophet is in the high- 
est degree figurative. 

13. No objects of natural history 
mentioned in Scripture, have been 
more celebrated than the cedars of 
Lebanon. The cedar tree, the Pinus 
cedrus of Linneus, is found on some 
of the mountains in Asia Minor, and 
in different parts of the Levant ; but 


nowhere so stately, beautiful, and 
fragrant, as on Lebanon, Notwith- 
standing all the ravages made in its 
famous forests, by the building of such 
palaces as those of Jerusalem, Perse- 
polis, Tadmor, and others, in ancient 
times ; the exportation of immense 
quantities from Tyre to different parts 
of the Mediterranean, and the constant 
use of it for wainscotting the houses 
in the surrounding country, down to 
the present time, there still remains 
a remnant sufficient to call forth the 
admiration of travellers. The number 
of the trees is different, as estimated 
by different persons who have visited 
the spot since they were first de- 
scribed by Bellonius in 1550. Dr. 
Richardson, who saw them in 1818, 
states :—“They are large, tall, and 
beautiful, the most picturesque pro- 
ductions of the vegetable world we 
had seen. There are in this clump 
two generations of trees; the oldest 
are large and massy, rearing their heads 
to an enormous height, and spreading their 
branches afar, We measured one of 
them, which we afterwards saw was not 
the largest in the clump, and found 
it thirty-two feet in circumference. 
Seven of these trees have a particu- 
larly ancient appearance; the rest are 
younger, but equally tall, though 
for want of space, their branches 
are not so spreading.” Some of 
them are stated by the Rey. Mr. Fisk, 
who visited them in 1823, to be about 
ninety feet high. Besides this forest, 
Seetzen discovered two others which 
surpassed it in extent. Rosenm. Bib. 
Geog. ii. p. 216. For Lebanon, see on 
chap. x. 34.—Next to the cedars of 
Lebanon, ranked ¢he oaks of Bashan, a 
mountainous, but exceedingly fertile 


CHAP. 11.} 


ISATAH. 


23 


16 And against all the ships of Tarshish, 
And all the vessels of delightful appearance. 


17 


And the pride of men shall be brought low, 


The loftiness of men shall be humbled, 
And Jehovah alone shall be exalted in that day. 


18 
19 
And the caves of the earth, 


And the idols shall wholly pass away. 
And men shall enter the caverns of the rocks, 


From the fear of Jehovah and from his glorious majesty, 
When he riseth to shake terribly the land. 


20 


Τὰ that day shall men cast their silver idols and their golden idols 


Which they have made for themselves to worship 


To the moles and to the bats: 


region beyond the Jordan: still, ac- 
cording to Mr. Buckingham, clothed 
with forests, among the trees of which 
oaks are frequently seen. Robinson 
describes part of his route in these 
parts as lying for nearly an hour and 
a half through a thick forest of fine 
oak-trees: and again speaks of the 
crests and sides of the hills being 
clothed with magnificent oaks, for 
which, he adds, this district, the an- 
cient Bashan, is still, as of old, justly 
celebrated, ii. pp. 209, 211. They 
were used by the Phenicians for oars, 
Ezek. xxvii. 6. 

16. ww nv, ships of Turshish; see 
on chap. xxiii, 10.—a7aN7 ΠΡ Ὁ cannot, 
on account of the parallelism, which 
exactly corresponds to that in the 
preceding verses, be extended, as 
Gesenius proposes, so as to compre- 
hend all the objects which had just 
been mentioned separately. Various 
interpretations have been given ; but 
that of ships delightful to look upon, 
suggested by the rendering of the 
LXX. πᾶσαν θέαν πλοίων κάλλους, best 
accords with the spirit of the passage. 

17. πὸ, in the masculine, with the 
fem. n1723, may either be used for the 
sake of uniformity with verses 9 and 
11; or, it may be accounted for on the 
principle, that when the predicate is 
mentioned before the subject is named, 
or its gender thought of, it may natu- 
rally assume the simplest form, which 
is that of the masculine singular. See 
Ewald, § 567. 


18. There is a peculiar beauty in 
the brevity of this verse, which in 
the original consists only of three 
words: AM OPN, in which the 
letter Lamed predominates. The sin- 
gular verb is used, to intimate that 
not one of the idols should remain. 
No language could more graphically 
describe the entire disappearance of 
idolatry. 

19. Judea, and the neighbouring 
regions, abound in caverns, some of 
them of an enormous size, to which 
the inhabitants were accustomed to 
flee for refuge, when attacked by 
enemies. Judg. vi. 2; xv. 8; 1 Sam. 
ΧΙ. 6; xiv. 11; xxiv. 3, 7, 8—}INT Por, 
another instance of paronomasia. 

20. This verse is connected with 
ver. 18, and shews how the idols 
were to pass away. However valuable 
they were, they should be rejected 
with contempt. ὃ is wanting in one 
of Kennicott’s MSS.; at first hand 
in one of De Rossi’s; and is erased 
from another; but, standing for 072, 
it is the common Dativus commodi. 
—nine 167? is found in five MSS. as 
one word, nmmen, and thus all the 
ancient versions (Theod. ἀφαρφερώθ), 
though they differ in their interpreta- 
tions. Taken separately, the words 
might signify, to the digging or burrow- 
ing, i.e. the holes of rats—nv®, corre- 


sponding to the Arab. x,l8, rats ; but 


as animals are mentioned immediately 
after, it is more natural to suppose 


24 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. III. 


21 When they go into the clefts of the rocks, 
And into the fissures of the cliffs : 
From the fear of Jehovah, and from his glorious majesty, 
When he riseth to shake terribly the land. 


22 Cease from man 


In whose nostrils is a breath ; 


For in what is he to be regarded ? 


that a simple reference to another 
species is made here. Besides, the 
quadrilateral form of the following 
noun makes the Kefa/fa/, or reduplicate 
form in this case the more probable. 
Both Gesenius and Hitzig object to 
rendering the word by mo/es, on the 
ground that these animals are found 
in the fields, and do not frequent old 
or ruinous buildings, like the bat ; and 
the latter commentator, following 
Abenezra, proposes sparrows; but the 
consideration, that persons fleeing for 
safety not only throw away what they 
may have accounted valuable before 
abandoning their houses, but also in 
their flight through the open country, 
renders it more likely that precisely 
moles are meant. Since the verb ἜΠ 
signifies fo dig, its geminated deriva- 
tive must denote some animal parti- 
cularly noted for perforation, than 
which none rivals the mole. See on 


the word, Bochart, Hierozo. vol. ii. p. 
1031. The fondness of both moles 
and bats for darkness, rendered them 
fit companions for the idols which 
were consigned to oblivion. 

21. The 9 in 82) denotes in such 
connexion, the time of doing any 
action. See Gesen. Lex. ὁ. 7. 

22. A very appropriate exhortation, 
arising out of the predicted destruction 
of all human glory. This verse is 
entirely omitted by the LXX.; but is 
found in the Targ. and both the 
Syriac versions, in Jerome and Αα., 
and is not known ever to have been 
wanting in the Hebrew text. Origen, 
Jerome, and after them Lyranus, 
Menochius, Luther, C&colampadius, 
and many others, strangely interpret 
the words of Christ—an interpreta- 
tion of which the Jews have not failed 
to avail themselves to reproach our 
Redeemer ! 


CHAPTER LiL 


The prophet now announces, in plain language, the severe privations to which 
the Jews would be subject, when the predicted judgments should be 


inflicted upon them. 


The cutting off of the necessaries of life; the removal 


of those in whose hands were the reins of government; the assumption of 
rule by totally incompetent persons ; the anarchy and perplexity consequent 
upon it ; and the causes of these evils; are all set forth in strong colours, 
verses 1—15. The remaining part of the chapter is chiefly occupied with 
a picture of female luxury, and the change that would take place in the 
appearance of the daughters of Zion, and that of the state generally, as the 
result of the visitations of Divine Providence. 


΄ 
CHAP. III.] 


ISAIAH. 


25 


1 For behold! the Lord Jehovah of Hosts 


Shall remove from Jerusalem and from Judah, 


The stay and the support; 


The whole stay of bread and the whole stay of water :— 


2 The hero and the warrior; 
The judge and the prophet ; 
The diviner and the elder; 


3 The commander of fifty and the honourable ; 
The counsellor, the skilful in magic, and the expert enchanter. 


1. There is an intimate connexion 
between this verse and that with 
which the preceding chapter concludes. 
yoo, like other participles following 
737, 15. indicative of the future, yo, 
mon lit. the male and the female support, 
for every kind of support. Another 
instance of this idiom, which is com- 
mon in the Arabic, occurs Nah. ii. 13, 
where the mas. 170, and the fem. 7579, 
signify different kinds of prey. Comp. 


Lariall, Vail, Harir. Cons. i. p. 


36. It cannot be imitated in our 
language, but in the Syr. Ver. we have 


{Asascm0 


Syr. {Dea DSO la ΠΩ ΒΆΡΗ Ξ the 


LXX. ἰσχύοντα καὶ ἰσχύουσαν; Aq. 
ἔρεισμα καὶ ἐρεισμὸν; Symm. στήριγμα 
καὶ στηριγμόν; and in the Jewish 
Span. sustentador y  sustentadora. — 
Though the idea of stay or support is 
more naturally connected with that 
of bread; hence ony7w2, the staff of 
bread, Lev. xxvi 26; Ps. cv. 16; and 
coincides with the use of the phrase 
22 Wd, to prop up, or support the heart, 
1:6. by taking food; yet it may not 
inappropriately be also employed in 
reference to water, on account of the 
strength obtained from its refreshing 
influence. The opinion of Gesenius 
and Hitzig, that the words 0»—5, 
after 7277W2, are an exegetical gloss, 
cannot be sustained, since they are 
required to complete the hemistich, 
and are otherwise quite in the style of 
the prophet. 

2, 3. In this enumeration, the 
different office-bearers and persons of 
influence are grouped in pairs—a mode 


{oasem; in the Hexap. 


of combination not unusual with our 
prophet. See chap. xi. 2; xix. 3, 6—9; 
xxl. 12, 13; xlii. 19. The coupling 
of DD? with δ), shews that the latter 
word is here used in a bad sense, to 
denote idolatrous prophets, or such as 
merely pretended to a divine commis- 
sion. See Micah ui.6,7. The oop 
were those who professed to interpret 
dreams and tell fortunes by the use of 
lots, observing the revolutions of the 
stars, the flight of birds, arrows, &c. 
Augurs have been found in all nations, 
but in none more plentifully than in 
the ancient nations of Asia, where 
they were attached to the court, and 
exerted a very great influence on the 
affairs of state. They were also 
introduced into Rome, and had a 
chief called the swmmus aruspex, or 
magister publicus. Comp. Ezek. xxi. 
21, 22; Dan. ii. 2, &c. own oon, if 
occurring alone, would signify one 
skilled iz the arts, a skilful artificer, 
which is the interpretation given in 
the LXX., Syr., Vulg., and Saad.; but 
its combination with wy 7.22 imme- 
diately following, determines the sense 
to that of magic arts, which is sup- 
ported by the Targ., and is the signi- 


fication of the Aramaic τ and La; eae. 


009, from n>, which, like ὙΠ, signifies 
to give a low, whispering, muttering 
sound, in the manner of sorcerers or 
enchanters, is descriptive of the art 
of incantation, and cannot, without 
doing violence to the native force of 
the term, be applied to oratory, or 
human eloquence Comp. ver. 20. 
The true meaning was more or less 
perceived by Aq. “ψιθυρισμῷ, Symm. 
ὁμιλίᾳ μυστίκῃ, and Theod. ἐπωδῇ. 


26 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. III. 


4 And I will make boys their rulers, 
And children shall govern them. 


or 


Every one his neighbour ; 


And the people shall oppress each other, 


The youth shall outrage the aged, 
And the despicable him who is honoured. 
6 Should any one take hold of another 
That is at home with his father, and say, 
Thou hast raiment ; be thou our ruler ; 
And let this ruin be under thy hand: 
7 In that day, he will protest, saying, 


(7 will not be a healer: 


For in my house is neither bread nor raiment, 
Make me not aruler of the people.” 


4, There is here a change of person, 
by which Jehovah is introduced as 
speaking ; which is not unfrequently 
the case in Isaiah. O'>°Yn is synony- 
mous with 04Y2, only it more forcibly 
expresses the petulance of boys in the 
exercise of assumed authority. LXX. 
ἐμπαίκται ; Luth. Aindische, childish 


persons. The abstract saucinesscs, 15 
used for the concrete, Comp. Eccles. 
x. 16. 


5. Instead of 32, eight MSS., fifteen 
printed editions, and among these, 
three of the earliest, read 32 ; but all 
the ancient versions have read as the 
Textus Receptus. The verb is here 
used in a reciprocal sense. The fol- 
lowing clauses are exegetical, and fur- 
nish a striking delineation of a state 
of anarchy. 

6. 3 is sometimes employed to ex- 
press what is conditional—a meaning 
which the connexion in this place re- 
quires. Wx and mx, are used idioma- 
tically, and not in the relative, or 
more confined sense of family con- 
nexion, Y28™3 is literally “the house 
of his father,” in which the person 
referred to lived in a state of retire- 
ment from public life ; but it is used 
elliptically for ™23, “in the house,” as 
Gen. xii. 15 ; 2 Kings xxii. 9, (5 Keri.) 
This interpretation of m2 supersedes 
the necessity of Lowth's conjecture, 
that tx has been dropped out of the 
text. After V8, two of Kennicott’s 


Codd. and the Babyl. Tal. add 7x2, 
which the LXX. and Chald. support. 
The Syr. and Arab. also supply V2") ; 
but the ellipsis of 7583, in poetry, 
is too common to warrant, on such 
slender authority, our adopting the 
reading, which is virtually implied in 
the preceding verb t=m, though it may 
be admitted into translations, That 
this person possessed some respecta- 
bility is evident from the special 
mention of 722%; properly a garment, 
which was worn immediately over the 
tunic, differing in size, but generally 
nine or ten feet in length, and five or 
six in breadth, but here obviously used 
for an abundant wardrobe, which 
would yield a supply sufficient to sup- 
port the dignity of office. Ps?, which, 
like the Arab. ol, kadi, signifies 


a magistrate or judge, is not much in 
use.—Instead of ἡ, thirty-five MSS., 
two printed editions, and the Babyl. 
Tal. read 72 in the plural. To be 
under the hand of any one, is to be 
subject to his power and management. 

7. After x, supply ἢν, or PP; a 
much more naturai filling up of the 
ellipsis than 7, since swearing seems 
here to be out of the question. Viewed 
in connexion withthe description of the 
diseased condition of the Jewish po- 
lity, chap. i. 6, in which the same verb 
(am) occurs, VIA, ὦ healer, is appro- 
priately used of one who binds up the 


CHAP. III.] 


ISATAH. 


8 For Jerusalem stumbleth, and Judah falleth ; 


Because their languge and their actions 
Have been against Jehovah— 
To provoke the eyes of his glory. 


The shew of their countenance testifies against them ; 


Their sin they announce like Sodom; they hide it not; 


Wo to them, 


For they bring calamity upon themselves. 


10 


Say ye to the righteous: It shall be well; 


For they shall eat the fruit of their actions: 


11 


Wo to the wicked: It shall be ill; 


. For the desert of their hands shall be rendered them. 


wounds of a state by the judicious use 
of authority. The LXX. resolve the 
figure by rendering it dpxnyos. A 
plentiful supply of dress and_ pro- 
visions being required, among the 
Orientals, in all who would assume 
the reins of government, or fill any 
public station, the individual applied 
to earnestly protests against any fur- 
ther proposals being made to him, on 
the ground that his resources would 
not meet the exigencies of the case. 
8. From this verse, to the 15th, the 
mora, or ruined state of things, de- 
scribed in the preceding verses, is ac- 
counted for, by its being traced to the 
fact, that the people had procured it 
by their base and wicked conduct, 
which Jehovah further threatens sig- 
nally to punish ; while, at the same 
time, he would make a due discrimi- 
nation in favour of the righteous.— 
τύ), the contracted form of niv97, the 
Infin. in Hiph. as Ps. Ixxviii. 17. This 
verb is usually followed by 75, the 
mouth ; ™, the spirit, also occurs Ps, 
cvi. 33; but Ὁ, as here, is very ex- 
pressive—the eye being that organ of 
the body which is most easily and 
keenly sensitive of pain. The absence 
of the former Jod in 2), which is 
borne out by most of the MSS., has 
occasioned considerable diversity of 
rendering. Michaelis, after the LXX., 
proposes to read "2%, humilis; and 
Lowth, 3232, cloud, as the Syr. does, 
(probably by a mistake of transcrip- 
tion,) supposing an allusion to be 
_tmade to the Shekinah in the wilder- 


ness ; but the very frequent omission 
of Jod fully justifies the Masoretic 
punctuation. The pronunciation is 
much the same in both readings. 

9. The Chald., Syr., Le Clerc, and 
Hitzig, render O28 M37, their partiality, 
or respect of persons. 1t cannot be de- 
nied that the phrase 0°22 T37 signifies 
to shew such partiality, Deut. 1. 17 ; 
xvi. 19, &c. ; and there can be no doubt 
that this sin obtained to a very great 
extent among the Jews at the time. 
Still, the use of 1737 and 377) N35, in the 
other member of the parallelism, 
evinces the propriety of the common 
rendering, which is defended by Ro- 
senmiiller, Gesenius, and Winer. 137 
is a verbal noun, from the Infin. in 
Hiph. ; in Kal. 723, fo be strange ; in 
Piel, fo estrange; but in Hiph. to look 
at, know: hence, look, shew, appearance, 
as the signification of the noun. The 
repeated comparison of the conduct of 
the Jews to that of the inhabitants of 
Sodom, shews at once how much the 
latter was professedly abominated, 
and how great were the aggravations 
of the former. An unblushing reck- 
lessness of character is here specially 
intended. D%92) x, lit. wo 10 their souls : 
51, however, in innumerable passages, 
signifies, as in the present instance, 
themselves. See the Lexicons.—23 is 
to be taken simply in the sense of 
doing or bringing evil, and not in that 
of maturing, as Michaelis proposes in 
his Suppl. ad Lexx. Heb. 

10, 11. As the text now stands, we 
are almost tempted to adopt the Anti- 


28 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. III. 


12 As for my people, children are their oppressors, 


And women lord it over them. 


O my people! thy leaders cause thee to err, 
They destroy the way of thy travellers. 

13 Jehovah hath set himself to contend, 
He standeth to judge the people. 

14 Jehovah will enter into judgment 


ptosis of Kocher, and render: Say ye 
that it shall be well with the righteous ; 
or, as Luther and Hitzig give it, Suy ye 
of the righteous, &c.; but there is no 
real difficulty in supposing, with the 
Chald. and Syr., an ellipsis of > before 
PIE, Just as °2 must be supplied before 
v1, in the following line. A similar 
ellipsis of ) occurs before 77M, Jer. ix. 
2; and of Ὁ before 01x, Job xxxiii. 17. 
Δήσωμεν, the reading of the LXX. has 
arisen from the 9 in 12x, having been 
mistaken for Ὁ, The words δήσωμεν 
τὸν δίκαιον, ὅτι δύσχρηστος ἡμῖν ἐστι, 
let us bind the Righteous One, for he 
as tnconvenient to us: or, as Justin Mar- 
tyr, Hegesippus, and Eusebius read, 
ἄρωμεν τὸν δίκαιον, let us destroy the 
Righteous One, are considered by many 
of the fathers as a prophecy of Christ, 
and the same view Dodson lamely 
attempts to vindicate—The suffix in 
> and v7, referring to PS, a collective 
noun, is to be rendered in the plural, 
to make it correspond with the plural 
forms in the 10th verse, which are ex- 
pletive of the corresponding collective. 
So Luther.—These two verses furnish 
a beautiful example of antithetic pa- 
rallelism, in which the contraries of 
persons, characters, actions, awards, 
&c. are opposed to each other. The 
pious are graciously assured, that in 
the worst of times, and under the 
most trying circumstances, God will 
be their friend and rewarder; while 
the ungodly are equally assured that 
they shall suffer merited punishment. 

12. rd is a collective, and thus 
agrees with the plur. part. yiv2i—a, 
more natural mode of construction 
than to consider the latter as a plural 
of excellence. The verb Y signifies 
to return, to do any thing a second time, 
thoroughly, or fully, to indulge one’s self 
at the expense of another, to behave 


hence DYN, 


petulantly or saucily ; 
For »2, comp. 


petulant boys, ver. 4. 
the Eth. 1.11}. Rex, Tyrannus, and 
the Arab. ty , excitavit, compulit et 


congregavit dispersos camelos, ἕο. In- 
stead of Ὁ), women, the LXX., Aq., 
Theod., Chald., and Arab. read D3, 
usurers, Which agrees well with vw2 ; 
but the position of the word requires 
it to correspond to 52», which the 
former signification exactly suits. The 
entire verse contains a further descrip- 
tion of the extreme imbecility of the 
government, at the time here predicted 
—a description fully realized after the 
death of Jotham. The two participles 
ow and ON, are forcibly opposed 
to each other: the former signifying, 
to lead or direct forward in a straight 
course ; the latter, to cause to wander 
from the right way, into devious 
courses, or into a trackless desert, 
where nothing but destruction can 
be expected, After DYN, supply 7q's, 
and comp. Micah iii. 5. The way of 
thy paths, 15 scarcely intelligible, except 
it mean the direction which paths 
take ; but there is no necessity for 
rendering it in this manner, since 
nim is used to denote caravans, or 
companies of travellers, as well as the 
paths which they pursue through the 
desert. See Job vi. 18, 19; Isa. xxi. 
13. Instead of conducting the people 
in the right course, as the guide of 
a caravan would do, the Jewish leaders 
not only turned the people aside, but 
effaced all traces of the way in which 
they should have walked. 

13, 14. ov do not here denote 
foreign nations, but the tribes of 
Israel, as Deut. xxxii. 8 ; xxxili. 3, 19; 
Ps. xlvii. 10; Hos. x. 14; as the con- 
text shews. Lowth supposes iY to 


CHAP. III.] 


ISATAH. 


29 


With the elders of his people, and their rulers. 
For ye have eaten up the vineyard, 
The spoil of the poor is in your houses. 
15 What mean ye that ye crush my people, 
And grind the persons of the poor ? 
Saith the Lord, Jehovah of Hosts. 


16 Moreover saith Jehovah : 


be the true reading; yet, though 
countenanced by the LXX. and Syr. 
it is critically indefensible. 0337 is 
used collectively of the vineyards. 
That it is not to be altered to "23, my 
vineyard, meaning the people, as the 
Chald. renders it, appears from the 
following words: 277 973, what has been 
plundered from the poor. Jehovah, as 
judge, calls the rulers to account for 
the oppression and robbery of which 
they had been guilty; to express 
which summons, there is a sudden 
turn in the composition from the pre- 
dictive style to that of direct personal 
address. The Yau in ON) is causal, 
and the use of the separate pronoun 
before the verb is, in such instances, 
_ emphatic. 

15. 0299, by contraction, for 02577, 
as in the Keri, which a number of 
Kenn. and De Rossi’s MSS. exhibit in 
the text. Supply >. oy 25 denotes 
not merely the faces, but the persons 
of the poor, the poor themselves. 
Luther die Person der Elenden. To 
grind a person is expressive of the 
greatest oppression, and corresponds 
to thecomminution or crushing spoken 
of immediately before. For an ampli- 
fication of the subject, see Micah iii. 
1—3. 

16. The following eight verses con- 
tain the most complete description of 
Oriental female attire to be met with 
in any ancient writing. It has been 
thought by some, that, owing to the 
change of fashion, and especially the 
difference between ancient and modern 
fashions in dress, every attempt to 
explain the several items in this 
inventory, must prove in a” great 
measure fruitless.. The more, how- 
ever, the fact of the immutability 
of Eastern manners and customs is 
established, by a comparison of their 
present features with those described 


as existing in former times; the more 
minute the accounts furnished by mo- 
dern travellers; and the greater the 
progress which has been made in the 
comparative philology of the Hebrew 
and its kindred dialects; the more 
definite and satisfactory have been the 
results of the investigations that have 
been instituted with a view to deter- 
mine the meaning of the words here 
employed. A very elaborate work on 
the passage, was published by Nicol. 
Guil. Schroeder, with a preface by the 
celebrated Albert Schultens, intituled : 
Commentarius Philologico - Criticus, de 
Festitu Mulierum Hebrearum, ad Isaia, 
iii. vers. 16—24, Lugd. Batav. 1745, 
4to; which, so far as philology is 
concerned, may be said to have 
exhausted the subject. 

Having at the outset charged the 
Hebrew females with pride in general, 
(1723,) Jehovah proceeds to specify the 
external indications of it in their dress 
and deportment.—ni3, for nv), as 
the Keri reads, like τον, for ny, 1 
Sam. xxv. 18. 3 is properly the 
throat, but is here used for the fore- 
part of the neck, which stretches and 
becomes more visible when an effort 
is made to toss up the head, or to 
throw it back into the attitude of 
haughtiness or pride. Instead of 
nape, ogling, forty-two printed edi- 
tions, and among them some of the 
most accurate, eight of De Rossi’s 
MSS., and one at first hand, read nyPw?, 
lying or “acting falsely with their eyes ;” 
but most MSS., the celebrated Spanish 
codices, all the ancient editions, and 
all the ancient versions, support the 
common reading, which has also the 
suffrages of Kimchi, Abarbanel, and 
several of the ancient rabbins. ‘Three 
of Kennicott’s MSS. have m7, with 
Samech instead of Sin, which also goes 
to increase the authority of the Textus 


D 


30 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. III. 


Because the daughters of Zion are haughty, 
And walk with outstretched necks and ogling eyes, 
Mincing always as they walk, and tinkling with their feet: 
17 The Lord will make bald the crown of the daughters of Zion, 
Yea, Jehovah will expose their shame. 
18 In that day the Lord will remove 


Receptus. Lowth, approving of the 
reading which exhibits Siz, renders 
freely: “falsely setting off their eyes 
with paint,” and supposes reference to 
be made to the custom, so universal in 
the East, of tinging the hair and 
edges of the eyelids with stibium or 
alkohol, in order to give a more impos- 
ing appearance to the white of the 
eye :—a practice, in deseribing which, 
Ezek. employs the very word, "ΠΡ, 
kéhal: F297, lit. “Thou soholest 
thine eyes,” 1.6. paintest them with 
kohol, xxiii. 40. This interpretation, 
however, does not suit the other parts 
of the verse, all of which describe 
some action of the members of the 
body, and not any action performed 
upon them. The meaning is, therefore, 


rightly given by Abulwalid: laces 
sil, Lay> οἱ LeBp Ἰο] 


lay, pel moist, Who ogle 
with the eyes. The word is used of a 
woman who flashes and flames with her 
eyes; and the meaning is, she darts her 


loots in a@ bold and lascivious manner. 


Both the Chald. 779 and the Arab. 
ys in the second Conj. express an 


action of the eyes. 

77, the Infin. absol. expresses con- 
tinued or unceasing action. "PY, a 
ἅπαξ hey. signifies, according to the 


force of the Arab. ab and 8), fo 


move nimbly or softly: hence, ἢ, a child, 
from its short and light steps. It is 
here descriptive of affected delicacy 
in walking. The mas. suff. in 077927 is 
not without effect; indicating, that 
the noise which the women made with 
their ankle-chains was totally at vari- 
ance with the modestly retiring cha- 
racter of the sex. One of De Rossi’s 


Codd. reads 71, doubtless by correction. 
For the obviously designed use of 
masculine pronouns, to intimate the 
incongruity of certain actions in refer- 
euce to female character, see Judges 
xix. 24; Ezek. xiii. 90.---ῦϑν, to make 
a tinkling noise with the rings which 
were worn round the ankles. See 
ver. 18. 

17. Many MSS., the Soncin. Bible, 
and Soncin. Proph. of 1486, read 7™ 
instead of πὸ, both in this and the 
following verse. That, in consequence 
of the superstitious veneration of Jew- 
ish transcribers for the sacred name, 
the latter word has crept into many 
passages which originally exhibited 
mm, is now universally admitted among 
Hebrew scholars. 722, causative, ‘to 
make to full off. Compare nne0, the 
scab or mange. The latter clause of 
the verse describes the entire destitu- 
tion of clothing, to which the gaudy 
Hebrew females should be reduced, in 
allusion to the ancient custom of 
stripping captives naked, and driving 
them in that state before their con- 
querors. See Lowth, and comp. chap. 
xlvii. 3; Nah. iii. 5, 6. 


18. Dow, sing. D2Y, Arab. (ple, a 
rope or string for binding the foot of a 
rk, to twist, tie round. 


It is used, Prov. vii. 22, of a ring or 
fetter put upon the leg of a delinquent, 
by way of punishment ; and here, of 
the ornamental rings of gold, silver, 
brass, ivory, &c. which, to this day, 
Eastern females wear about their legs 
and ankles. They are frequently 
numerous, one above another; and, 
slipping up and down, from the motion 
made in walking, produce a tinkling 
noise. Little bells are even attached 
to them, or into such of them as are 
hollow are put small pebbles, which 
make the same tinkling sound. Cal- 
met, Art. Periscelides; Parkhurst in 


camel, from 


CHAP. II. ] 


ISAIAH. 


The ornaments of the ankle-bands, 
And the tasselled tresses and the crescents ; 
19 The ear-pendents, and the bracelets, and the small veils; 
20 'The turbans, and the stepping chains, and the girdles, 
And the smelling-bottles and the amulets ; 


voc. DY; Harmer’s Obser. chap. xi. 
Obser. xlvii. That they were also 
used by the Grecian and Roman ladies, 
see Schroeder, pp. 14—17. Comp. 
ver. 16. 

oo, The apparently violent 
transition from the leg or ankle rings 
to the head-dress, at once disappears, 
if we explain this word of braided 
tresses of hair, such as those which 
Pitts describes the loose women at 
Cairo as wearing down to their very 
heels, with little bells attached to 
them at the end, which made a tink- 
ling sound as they walked. D2 is 
synonymous with 20 and wiv, 70 
interweave, plait. The LXX. render 
it κοσύμβους, which, besides other 
significations, is used to denote tassels 
hanging to the hem, or to the lower 
part of a garment, and may have been 
employed by them, in application to 
the ends of the tresses resembling 
such tassels. Schroeder's interpreta- 
tion, soliculi, however ingeniously and 
elaborately supported, is now generally 
regarded to be untenable.—That the 
following term, D7, means /unule, 
crescents, or ornaments in the shape of 
little moons, hung upon the neck, is as 
generally admitted. These ornaments 
were not peculiar to the women, but 
were also worn by men and camels, 
Jud. viii. 21, 26. 

19. MDD), pendants or ear-drops, from 
703, to drop,—peculiarly descriptive of 
ornaments of pearl, gold, &c. hanging 
from the ears in the shape of drops.— 
These also were worn by men of rank, 
Jud. viii. 26 —nin}, bracelets, or small 
chains of gold or silver worn on the 
arms, and perhaps in nothing differing 
| from those called ony, Gen. xxiv. 22. 
The word is derived from WW, fo twist 


or bind about.—™My), Arab. ele cy ὃ par- 


ticular kind of smadl thin veil, consist- 
ing of two pieces, which were united 
with clasps, near the eyes, and hung 
down over the face to preserve it from 


the sun. The name seems to be 
derived from the tremulous motion 
which they exhibited ; but the term 
being closely connected with the pre- 
ceding, more regard may be had. to 
the elegance of the clasps, than to the 
veils themselves. 

20. DNNE, tiaras or turbans, a Species 
of ornamental head-dress, to which 
Eastern females are still very partial, 
and which they generally arrange in 
the most elegant manner—Mmv3, Arab, 


eae, from Wy, fo march or walk in 


a stately and measured manner, and 
signifying walking or stepping chains. 
Catena, qua captiworum pedes constrin- 
guntur, ne amplos passus facient; catena 
in pedibus mulierum, que ornamento tn- 
servit. Freytag. They were fastened 
to the legs, and were designed to 
prevent long steps, and compel those 
who used them to walk in the manner 
described, ver. 16. From the cireum- 
stance, that 77yzx, from the same root, 
is used of a male ornament, worn on 
the arm, 2 Sam. i. 10, (comp. Num. 
xxxi. 50,) it has been supposed that 
some such female ornament is meant: 
and, indeed, by a slight change of the 


letters in Arabic, Nae, Brachiale, 


brachii vinculum vel ornamentum, 
Gol. the same idea is brought out ; 
yet still the meaning assigned above, 
seems entitled to the preference. So 
Schroeder, Gesenius, Rosenmiiller, and 
Hitzig.— That op, signify female 
girdles, is beyond dispute. The word 
occurs only once besides ; viz. Jer. 1. 
32, where, however, it is used, less 
specifically, of such parts of female 
dress as required binding. Comp. for 
the use of the verb in Piel, Is. xlix. 
18.—wen ona, lit, “houses of the 
breath:” 1.6. smelling bottles, or boxes of 
perfume, the eftect of which, when 
inhaled, is to assist respiration. They 
were suspended to a lace or belt, tied 
round the waist. ™3, in Heb. signifies 


32 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. III. 


21 The finger-rings and the jewels of the nose. 
22 The dress-vestments and the tunics ; 

And the cloaks and the purses ; 
23 The mirrors and the linen shifts ; 

And the ribands and the large veils. 


whatever contains any thing. oD»n, 
from 72, in Piel, to mutter, use en- 
chantments, denote amulets, consisting 
of precious stones, plates of gold, 
silver, &c. which were chiefly sus- 
pended by chains round the neck, and 
were supposed to possess the power 
of preserving against diseases, witch- 
craft, and all kinds of mischief. 
Many of them were in the shape of 
serpents. Such talismans are still 
very common all over the East, and 
form an indispensable part of female 
attire. 

21. nv20, a ring worn on one of the 
fingers of the right hand, and contain- 
ing a seal or signet with the name of 
the possessor engraved on it. The 
sub. 1s derived from 29, fo sink, or 
cause to sink into a soft substance, to 
impress With a seal, Esth. 111. 10. It 
is equivalent to onin, Jer. xxii. 24; but 
may here be taken to signify rings in 
general, for wearing on the fingers. 
—hx7 Ὁ). Some, after the LXX. τὸν 
κόσμον Tov προσώπου, interpret this 
of any kind of ornaments for the face; 
but, as 032 signifies in the Arabic, Zo 
perforate, and #8 strictly and properly 
denotes the nose, there can be no 
doubt, that nose-jewels or nose-rings are 
meant, Comp. Ezek. xvi. 12; and 
Prov. xi. 22. “It is the custom,” 
says Sir John Chardin, “in almost all 
the East, for the women to wear rings 
in their noses, in the left nostril, 
which is bored low down in the 
middle. These rings are of gold, and 
have commonly two pearls and one 
ruby between, placed in the ring.” 
See also Lowth’s Note. From the 
perforating of the ears, 012 is likewise 
used of earrings, Gen. xxxv. 4. 

22, ΤΙΣ, splendid and pompous vest- 
ments, gala dresses, worn only on special 
occasions, and so called from their 
being put off the moment such occa- 
sions were over, in order to keep them 
from being tarnished: yy, Arab. ws, 


signifying, to pull or put off a garment. 
Comp. Zech. iii. 4, where the word 
denotes the costly and splendid robes 
of the high-priest.—nipar, s/oles, or 
wide tunics, worn over the common 
ones, furnished with sleeves, and 
reaching to the ankles. Root, 7, 70 


cover, or clothe, Arab. wahee, Symm., 


ἀναβόλαια. ---- ΒΟ, ample cloaks, or 
wide upper garments, worn at home 
and on ordinary occasions. They 


corresponded to the WKS, hyle, of 


the Arabs, made of wool, commonly 
about seven ells in length, by three in 
breadth, and thrown loosely round the 
body. Such was the large garment of 
Ruth, which contained six measures of 
barley; and Dr. Shaw informs us, 
that finer sorts are still worn by the 
ladies and persons of distinction 
among the Arabs. Travels, p. 225.— 
Don, pockets, or purses for holding 
money and other small articles, 2 


Kings v. 23; Arab. dey >, —conical 


in form, of satin or velvet, and richly 
ornamented with gold. 

23. ™2*%3, Interpreters are here 
chiefly divided between the significa- 
tions mirrors, and transparent garments. 
The latter is supported by the render- 
ing of the LXX. διαφανῆ Λακωνικὰ, 1.6. 
garments that might be seen through, 
such as were worn by the indecent 
Lacedemonian females ; and it might 
appear very appropriate in application 
to the dress of the wanton Hebrew 
females in the time of Isaiah ; but, as 
"2, in the singular, signifies a smooth, 
polished tablet, chap. viii. 1, the 
former interpretation is preferable. 
The mirrors of the Hebrews were 
round in form, provided with a handle, 
and made of brass or mixed metal, 
highly polished; and the females 
doubtless carried them about with 
them, as do the dancing girls in Jndia, 
and as the females used to do in Egypt 


CHAP. 111.} 


ISAIAH. 


33 


24 And instead of perfume shall be putridity ; 
And instead of a girdle, a rope ; 
And instead of braided hair, baldness ; 
And instead of the wide-flowing mantle, a wrapper of sackcloth ; 


A brand instead of beauty. 


25 Thy men shall fall by the sword ; 


And thy forces in war. 


26 Her gates shall lament and mourn, 


and Greece, at certain idolatrous festi- 
vals. Comp. Exod. xxxviii. 8.—o'y70, 
under-garments or shifts of fine linen, 
cotton, or gauze, worn next the body ; 


from 710, Arab. 


1D, wo laxavit, demisit 
vestem suum, to let the garment hang 
loose.—Mb22, ribands, chiefly used for 
binding the braided tresses of the 
hair round the head, or sashes of fine 
linen bound round the bottom of the 
tiara.—_OTN), large veils, thrown over 
the head, and descending over the 
other garments to the feet. They 
were worn when the females went 
abroad, and were more exposed to the 
gaze of spectators. Comp. Song v. 
7. Root, ™, to bring down, subdue: 
hence, the idea of power, subjection to 
power ; and the veil, as the mark of 
such subjection, expressed by the 
much contested term, ἐξουσία, 1 Cor. 
xi. 10. See Bloomfield in loc. 

24. There is here a sudden turn in 
the address ; but instead of dropping 
the subject, it is presented under a 
new and aggravating form. Not only 
were all the articles of finery to be 
removed, but every thing that was 
coarse, vulgar, and disgusting, was 
to supply their place. p92 or ῬῸ, rotten- 
ness, or a fetid smell—the very opposite 
of the 0a contained in the smelling 
bottles, ver. 20.—7873, from ἢ), fo sur- 
round, bind round, a cord or rope tied 
round the waist.—tv7o Ww», braided 
work, i.e. hair artificially made up into 
braids, and interwoven and stiffened 
with ribands and other materials. 
See ver. 18. Root, πῦρ, fo stiffen, 
make hard.—?7n2 occurs only here, 
and is of uncertain derivation. The 
most probable is that which regards 
it as compounded of ‘78, from 72, to 
be wide, eapanded, and 72, to be or move 


round; a full mantle, flowing all round 
the body.—7v, coarse haircloth, used 
for sacks, and worn in time of mourn- 
ing, or by the very poorest, in lieu of 
other clothing —® nqn72, There is a 
peculiar beauty in the terseness with 
which the whole description thus con- 
cludes. 3, though only found in this 
place as a noun, is evidently used to 
signify brand or burnt mark, being 
regularly formed from ΠῚ, fo burn, as 


+t) 


Ἢ from my, Ἢ from mm, το. pe 
} }.adt}. ultimum morbi remedium 
Ip lol) 


cauter est. Meidan.. Proverb. iv. 
sil us εν} Lisl, et morbum ad 


cauterium pervenisse. Hariri Con- 
sen. xxix. As the whole verse de- 
scribes the deplorable condition of 
female captives led away by their 
conquerors, the brand is to be under- 
stood of the στίγματα, or marks which 
it was customary to burn into the 
foreheads of prisoners and slaves. 

25, 26. Here Jerusalem is first 
directly addressed, and then her deso- 
late condition is aptly depicted. By 
an unexpected transition, the destruc- 
tion of the males becomes the subject 
of a brief, but affecting notice. 2, 
military force, used collectively for 
mighty warriors. The gates being 
entirely deserted, are represented bya 
prosopopeeia, as indulging in grief, the 
intensity of which is expressed by 
the synonymes, 738 and %28.—TDp, 
cleared, i.e. completely emptied of 
inhabitants. Nothing could be more 
expressive than the metaphorical re- 
presentation of Jerusalem, sitting like 
a disconsolate female on the ground: 
and it is very remarkable, that on 
Roman medals, struck by order of 


94 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. IV. 


And, emptied, she shall sit on the ground. 


CHAPTER IV. 


1 And seven women shall lay hold on one man in that day, saying : 
We will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel : 
Only let us be called by thy name, 


To take away our reproach. 


Titus, in commemoration of his con- 
quest of Jerusalem, and the entire 
destruction of the Jewish polity, 
Judea actually appears in the posture 
of a female sitting on the ground, 
under a palm tree, and giving way to 
inconsolable grief. See Horne’s Introd. 
vol. i. pp. 215, 216. The prophecy 
doubtless received its accomplishment 
in the Babylonish captivity ; though 
the language is equally applicable to 
that inflicted by the Romans. Comp. 
Ps ΟΣ ΧΙ 1: am, iy 1: 


CuapteR IV.—1. This verse is so 
intimately connected with the pre- 


ceding, that the division of thechapters 
here is most unhappy. Such should 
be the carnage of the war, ver. 25, 
that there would be no proportion of 
men left ; and as the Hebrews regarded 
celibacy as a reproach, rather than 
incur such reproach, a number of 
females are here described as immo- 
destly importuning one man to marry 
them, that they might have the honour 
of standing in the relation of wives to 
him, though they renounced all claim 
upon him for support. That it was 
customary for the wife to be named 
after the husband, see Gen. xii. 17; 
zlyiwl93 2:Samaat. 3; 


CHAPTER IV. 


Having depicted the wickedness of the Jews, and the awful judgments with 
which it would be punished, the prophet devotes this short chapter to an 
announcement of the glory and felicity of the church in the time of 


Messiah. 


2 In that day the Branch of Jehovah 
Shall be beautiful and glorious ; 


2. samy DV3, af or after that period; 
viz. of universal desolation. The pre- 
position 2 does not always. strictly 
express what is contained within any 
given time or space; it also points out 
nearness, society, or accompaniment, 
that which is in connexion with, or 
which follows upon something else. 
In prophetic vision, the two states of 
adversity and prosperity were so closely 


connected, that one period might be 
said to comprehend them both. See 
chap. x. 20, and Zech. xii. xiii. xiv. 
where the phrase is used of events 
partly coeval, and partly successive. 
mm ΤΌΣ, according to all the other 
passages in which a Mx, Branch, is 
promised, must be taken in a personal 
sense. See Jer. xxiii. 5; xxxili. 15; 
Zech. 111. 8; vi. 12; and comp. Is. xi. 


CHAP. IV.] 


ISATAH. 


And the Fruit of the earth, excellent and splendid 


To the escaped of Israel. 
3 And he that is left in Zion, 
And remaineth in Jerusalem, 


Shall be called holy : 


Every one who is enrolled to life in Jerusalem. 


1; ln. 2; Ezek: xxxiv. 29. Nor is it 
possible for any one impartially to 
examine the connexion and bearing 
of these passages without perceiving, 
that the person therein predicted or 
promised is no other thanthe Mrssrau. 
Thus, the Targ. "7 xmwo, Kimchi, 
Vitringa, Lowth, Rosenmiller, and 
Hengstenberg in his Christol. That 
mim ΤΌΣ means the same as ON 13, the 
Son of God, receives confirmation from 
the Oriental appropriation of the term 
Branch, to signify descent. Thus, 
Silvestre de Sacy, in his “Mémoires 
sur Diverses Antiquités de la Perse,’ 
p. 94:—“This expression, branch of, 
denoting ‘of the race of, is very 
common in the books of the Persians. 
Zoroaster is there called the Branch 
of Minochehr; Yezdejerd, the Branch 
of Sassan; Gustasp, the Branch of 
Kéan,’ &c. The occurrence of ma? 
own, “to the escaped Israelites,” pre- 
sents an insuperable objection to the 
interpretation of Grotius, Michaelis, 
Gesenius, Hitzig, and others, that the 
pious remnant of the Jews are meant. 
Since it is expressly predicted, that to 
this very remnant, the Branch was to 
be beautiful and glorious, it is manifest 
they cannot be identical. It has been 
thought, however, that to explain “2 
yus7, “the Fruit of the earth,” of the 
Messiah, would be intolerably harsh. 
Yet, if we understand jx to stand, by 
synecdoche, for the inhabitants of the 
earth, i.e. men, which is a figure not 
unusual in Scripture, the harshness is 
at once removed, and the same anti- 
thetical view of the origin of the 
Messiah’s person is given, which we 
find Rom. ix. 5. The passage thus 
contains a prediction of the divine and 
human natures of our Lord, similar to 
what we find in chap. vii. 14 ; ix. 5. (6.) 
John the Baptist likewise employs the 
phrase, ὁ ὧν ἐκ τῆς γῆς, John iii. 31, to 
denote one who is simply a partaker 


of humanity, while he describes the 
Messiah, whose human nature he takes 
for granted, as 6 ἄνωθεν ἐρχόμενος. 
Comp. Luke i. 78, where our Saviour 
is called ἀνατολὴ ἐξ ὕψους, 1.6. MX, 
which the LXX. have rendered ἀνα- 
τολὴ, Jer, xxiii. 5; Zech. iii. 8; vi. 12. 
—While all human pride was to be 
stained, and all human ornaments to 
be removed, every true Israelite would 
find in the Messiah a plenitude of 
glory and splendour. 72%», “The 
escaped,” seems to refer rather to 
those who should be delivered from 
the corrupt body of the nation, τὸ 
κατάλειμμα of the Apostle, Rom. ix. 
27, than to such as either remained in 
Judea, or returned from captivity. 
Comp. Zeph. iii. 11, 12. The 2 before 
the four first nouns converts them 
into adjectives, as Lam. iv. 3. ‘293 
wy), “the daughter of my people is Zo 
ὦ cruel one; 1.6. is cruel.” 

3. WEN and WT are collective par- 
ticiples, and form the nom. absol.; 
and agree with 70% in the foregoing 
verse, which is also a collective. i? 
is to be taken in the N. T. sense of 
dyos,—reference being made to the 
times of the Messiah. ‘2x has here 
the idiomatic sense of 83}, fo call, i.e. 
to be what one is called. 227 52 is 
in apposition with the preceding par- 
ticiples ; and O17? 22 corresponds to 
τεταγμένοι εἰς ζωὴν αἰώνιον, Acts xiii. 
48; and γέγραπται ἐν τῷ βιβλίῳ τῆς 
ζωῆς, Rey. xiii. 8; but not to Exod. 
Xxxil. 32, though this last passage no 
doubt furnished the type both of the 
idea and the phraseology. Dan. xii. 
1, is perfectly parallel with this text 
in Isaiah. The verse describes the 
exalted character for moral purity, 
which should distinguish those whom 
God would acknowledge as his future 
people, and on whom he would confer 
salvation. 


90 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. IV. 


Jerusalem from the midst of her, 


4 When the Lord washeth away the filth of the daughters of Zion, 
And cleanseth out the blood of 
With the spirit of judgment, and the spirit of burning ; 
5 Then shall Jehovah create 
Upon every station of Mount Zion, 
And upon her places of convocation, 
A cloud and a smoke by day ; 
And the brightness of a flaming fire by night ; 
Which shall be over all the glory for protection : 
6 And a tabernacle shall be for shade by day from the heat ; 


And for a refuge and a covert, 
From storm and from rain. 


4, 5, —Ox, when—then: pointing out 
the connexion between the spiritual 
purification that Jehovah would effect, 
and the Divine protection which he 
graciously promises.— Kz is the most 
expressive term that could have been 
employed to denote the loathsomeness 
of moral pollution. 27123, as a geo- 
graphical phrase, would signify towns 
and villages lying round and depend- 
ent on Zion, and so Rosenmiiller and 
Hengstenberg understand it in this 
passage ; but it is clearly to be taken, 
as in chap. 111. 16, for the female inha- 
bitants. In like manner, 074 stands 
for “723, ‘the sons of Jerusalem,’ 7.¢. 
the male inhabitants, who are more 
appropriately charged with the shed- 
ding of blood. The LXX. supply 
freely: τῶν υἱῶν καὶ τῶν θυγατέρων 
Σιών. ™, in this passage, is almost 
pleonastic, only it gives force to the 
words with which it is in construction, 
just as %22 and oxy do, The judgment 
and the burning would be of the 
severest kind. Comp. Mal. iii. 1—4. 
qva is the Infin. nomin. in Piel. 2 is 
omitted before }22 in six MSS., but it 
is expressed in all the ancient versions ; 
and instead of πο in the sing. up- 
wards of forty MSS. and nearly fifty 
printed editions read πο. in the 
plur. The language is universal in its 
character, and is inapplicable to any 
period except that of the gospel dis- 
pensation. The earthly Jerusalem was 


no longer to be the station to which 
men should repair for worship; but to 
all places where the true worshippers 
of Jehovah should meet in holy con- 
vocation, he promises to vouchsafe his 
presence and protection. Mal. i, 10, 
11; John iv. 21—23; Matt. xviil. 20; 
1 Cor. i. 2. The figurative reference 
is to the pillar of cloud, and the pillar 
of fire, in which the Lord went before 
the Israelites in the wilderness, and to 
the glory which rested upon the taber- 
nacle, Exod. xiii. 21, 22; xl. 38. 3 is 
used here as a relative pronoun. 
Gesen. Lex. Man.—87 is properly the 
canopy of the nuptial couch, but is 
here employed in the sense of protec- 
tion, from the Pual of 759, fo cover, 
hence ἕο protect, like #7. By 22 is 
meant the transcendently glorious 
state of the church under the Messiah, 
as contrasted with her condition under 
Moses—a glory which is not to be 
done away, but is to remain, 2 Cor. 
iii. 7—11, as the result of Divine pro- 
tection. The omission of % before 
22 in a few MSS. is not entitled to 
any consideration. 

6. So great was to be the care of 
God over his people, that every ad- 
vantage should be afforded them in 
the way of constant defence from the 
inconveniences and dangers to which 
they might be exposed. Comp. Zech. 
ii, 5. 


CHAP. V.| 


ISAIAH. 


37 


CHAPTER V. 


This chapter contains a parabolic reprehension of the Jews for their irreligious 
and wicked conduct, 1—7 ; a specification of particular sins which abounded 
at the time, such as avarice, inebriety, perversion of right and wrong, self- 
conceit, and injustice, 8—23; a denunciation of Divine judgments, 24, 25 ; 
and a description of the agents by whom these judgments would be inflicted, 


26—30. 


1 Come, I will sing to my Beloved 
A song of my Love touching his vineyard ; 


My Beloved had a vineyard 
Upon a fertile peak. 


2 He dug it theroughly and cleared it of stones, 
And planted it with the vine of Sorek ; 
And he built a tower in the midst of it, 
And also hewed out a wine-vat in it: 


1. The prophet commences with a 
beautiful parable of a vineyard, most 
advantageously situated, with which 
every pains had been taken by the 
owner ; but which totally disappointed 
his expectations, and was in conse- 
quence abandoned to desolation.—va 
after §2,in one of Kennicott’s Codd. 
is an emendation. The form, “ 77x, 
is that used elsewhere, and the whole 
sentence is equally elegant without 
the emendation, of which Lowth ap- 
proves. The same usage shews, that 
? is simply the sign of the dative, and 
not the preposition signifying ἐμ refer- 
ence to, respecting, &c. which is the 
construction of many interpreters. 
The 4 paragogic in 77s forcibly ex- 
presses the desire of the speaker 
towards the action predicated. Be- 
tween PT and °7\7 there is no difference 
of signification in this place. Both 
designate Jehovah, who was the object 
of the song, inasmuch as it was designed 
to vindicate his conduct towards his 
people; and, at the same time, its 
author, inasmuch as it was dictated 
by his Spirit. 2, properly ὦ horn, but 
applied metaphorically, as the term is 
in many other languages, to a pointed 
hill or mountain, especially such as 
juts out so as to form a promontory. 
See Lowth, who supposes the image to 


be taken from Mount Tabor; and 
comp. .the Arab. olyss vertex montis, 


wy? 5)» parvus mons, aliis pars 


montis cetera parte separata. We 
are not, however, to imagine that the 
whole hill was covered with vines ; 
probably only that part of it was 
thus occupied, which was most shel- 
tered from the wind, and exposed to 
the sun. To express the great fertility 
of the hill, it is called ΚΟ, @ soz of 
oil or fatness, i.e. fat, fertile, according 
to a common idiom in Heb. by which 
a thing is said to be the son of what- 
ever quality it possesses. 

2. The digging expressed by Γῆν, is 
that which was necessary in order to 
loosen the stones that were afterwards 
to be cleared away, to make room for 
the vines. 7D, to gather and cast stones 
out of a field. Several interpreters, 
after the LXX. understand both this 
and the preceding verb to refer to the 
forming of a trench, and a wall round 
the vineyard, but contrary to the 
force of the terms. Pi, Sorel, the 
name of a valley between Askelon and 
Gaza, probably so called, because of 
its abounding in vines: 77%, signifying, 
to intertwine as the shoots or tendrils 
of the vine, and pw, shoots or tendrils 


Ε 


38 ISATAH. 


[CHAP. V. 


And then expected it to produce grapes, 


But it produced bad grapes. 


3 And now, O inhabitants of Jerusalem and men of Judah, 
Judge, I pray you, between me and my vineyard. 
4 What more could have been done to my vineyard 


Than I have done to it ? 


Why, when I expected it to produce grapes, 


Did it produce bad grapes ? 
Well now, I will tell you 


or 


What I will do to my vineyard: 
‘I will remove its fence, and it shall become a pasture ; 
I will demolish its wall, and it shall be trodden down ; 


thus intertwined, Gen. xlix.11. The 
word is used by Jeremiah to denote a 
vine of noble or excellent quality, 
chap. 1]. 21, which is not without reason 


supposed to be the «9 »"» Sherki, 


which Hést found in “Morocco, the 
grapes of which the Persiansand Turks 


call οὐδ Kishmish. They are 


’ 
small in size, reddish in colour, with 
small or scarcely any stones, and have 


a very sweet taste. Comp. a dye 
vitis generosa, Gol.; (Ὁ) dy which Abul- 


walid describes as the noblest vine, 
growing in Syria, Gesenius zz Joe.; 


and ae of the Arab. ver. Gen. 


xlix. 11. The LXX. Aq. and Theod. 
retain the word σωρήκ;; but Symm. 
renders it ἐκλεκτήν, choice, excellent. 
The 2329, fower, was built for the pur- 
pose, not only of watching the vine- 
yard, but also of accommodating the 
owner during the vintage,and contained 
the various implements used in culti- 
vating the vine, and preparing the 
wine. By 37 is properly meant the 
lower vat or trough, situated near the 
wine-press, in which the grapes were 
trodden, and into which the juice 
flowed as it was pressed out. It was 
called Anvos by the Greeks ; and from 
its inferior position to the n3, or wine- 
press, the LXX. commonly render it 
ὑπολήνιον. From the circumstance, 
however, that no mention is here made 
of the latter, the 37 may include both, 


as it certainly does in the plural, Job 
xxiv. 11. It is said to have been hewn 
out, because a subterraneous cistern or 
vat was necessary for the coolness of 
the situation. Such cisterns were 
sometimes so large, that the term 
λάκκος, lacus, lake, came to be applied 
to them. The words of our Lord’s 
parable, ὥρυξεν ὑπολήνιον kal ὠκοδόμησε 
πύργον, Mark xii. 1, are parallel in 
sense to those employed by Isaiah.— 
ora has been variously rendered. 
The LXX. and Theod. ἀκάνθας ; Symm. 
Serie 


ἀτελῆ; Aq. σαπριαὶ. Syr. 1>Q}a0, 
coroobs, the ceratonia siliqua of Lin- 
neeus. Jerome: dabruscas, wild vines. 
The idea of bad or worthless grapes 
seems that which is best supported. 
The root, tx3, signifies to give an 
offensive smell, be odious, bad, &c. 

3. In the true style of parable, the 
application is reserved for the close ; 
so that the call made in this verse for 
a decision from the very people whose 
conduct it was designed to expose, is 
introduced with great effect and beauty. 
They are virtually called upon to con- 
demn themselves. Comp. 2 Sam. xii. 
1—6; Matt. xxi. 40.—20Y and Wx are 
collectives. 

5. No mention is made of ΠΡ or 
ὙΠ in the account of the formation of 
the vineyard ; but they are introduced 
here for the sake of immediate effect. 
The latter word denotes a wall of 
stones or clay; the former, a thorn 
hedge, planted outside the other, for 
the sake of greater protection. The 
finite form of the verbs is understood 


ME, eee 


CHAP. V.| 


6 1 will lay it entirely waste ; 


ISATAH. 39 


It shall neither be pruned nor weeded, 
But thorns and briers shall grow up in it; 


And 1 will charge the clouds 
Not to pour any rain upon it. 


7 For the vineyard of Jehovah of hosts is the house of Israel ; 
And the men of Judah are his pleasant plantation. 
He expected justice, but behold! bloodshed! 
Righteousness, but behold! outery! 

8 Wo to them that join house to house, 


That add field to field, 


Till no place remains, 


And ye are left to dwell by yourselves in the land. 
9 In my ears Jehovah of Hosts hath revealed it: 


after the infin. 32 is the Infin. nomin. 
and is to be rendered as a noun. 

6. 703, from nna, to cut off, make an 
end of, desolate, destroy, means complete 
desolation. It should have been pointed 
with a Dagesh compensative, in the n, 
as we find the plural nin3q 52, valleys 
completely desolate, chap. vi. 19.— 
The Ὁ in ὙΠῸ has the force of a 
negative. 

7. The prophet now makes a direct 
application of the parable—introducing 
it by the particle 33, which expresses 
the certainty of the thing declared. 
Though the ten tribes originally be- 
longed to the vineyard of Jehovah, 
yet, as they had cut themselves off 
from it by revolt and idolatry, it is 
not likely that the phrase x1 ΤΡ, is 
here used in application to them. It 
seems rather to be employed as a 
poetic parallel to the following 1777 wx, 
—hboth signifying the inhabitants of 
the kingdom of Judah. 073, in con- 
nexion with the following rrwyw, has 


all the force of the Arab. ys to 


possess generosity of nature, be noble, 
excellent. The latter Hebrew word, 
being reduplicate in form, is expres- 
sive of the highest degree of delight. 
ἜΞΩ and ΠΕ; MPI and NAVs, are 
instances of studied paronomasia, or 
play upon words, in which our prophet 
abounds; see particularly chap. xxiv. 
—but they can seldom be successfully 
imitated in a translation—newn, from 


ΤΡ τ ΠΕΡ, Arab, 
blood. 

8. Having stated in general terms 
the atrocious wickedness of the Jews, 
which corresponded to the bad grapes 
in the parable, the prophet proceeds 
to denounce Divine judgments against 
particular sins. In 17—’y22 is an 
instance of a proposition commencing 
with a participle, and being continued 
in the future of a finite verb,—a mode 
of construction not uncommon in 
Hebrew. See Gesen. Lehrgeb. p. 802.— 
For opr, seven Codd. prim. one, and 
now one, the early Edd. of Soncin. and 
Brix. and fifteen other Edd. read dara 
in Hiphil; but the Hophal conjugation 
alone suits the connexion. It is found 
in the best Codd. and in most of the 
old Edd. The change of person, for 
the purpose of direct address, however 
abrupt, is not unusual with our pro- 
phet.—The monopoly of houses and 
landed property was diametrically 
opposed to the spirit of the Mosaic 
law, and a virtual infraction of the 
enactment relative to the year of 
jubilee ; but such was the perversion 
of justice, that the rich, if they were 
not aided by those who should have 
administered it, were, at least, suffered 
quietly to dispossess the poor, and 
accumulate property in the most un- 
righteous manner. 

“9. For -ns3, in my ears, three of De 
Rossi’s MSS. one at first hand, and 


ems to pour out, shed 


40 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAR vy. 


Verily, the numerous houses shall become a desolation, 
The large and fine ones shall be without inhabitants. 


10 


For ten acres of vineyard shall produce only one bath, 


And a homer of seed shall produce but an ephah. 


il 


Wo to them who, early in the morning, run after strong drink : 


Who, late at night, inflame themselves with wine. 


12 


And the lyre and the harp, the tabret and the pipe, 


And wine compose their feasts ; 
But the operation of Jehovah they do not consider, 
Nor do they regard the work of his hands. 


apparently another, Munster’s Edd. of 
1534 and 1546, the Basel Polyglott of 
Isaiah, read "2183, iz the ears of Jehovah 
of hosts; and this is the rendering of 
the LXX.and Arab. That the true 
pointing is that of the Textus Recep- 
tus, appears from chap. xxii. 14, where 
the ellipsis of 732) is supplied, and a 
sense produced, which is at once easy 
and appropriate. If the word ever 
existed in this passage, it must have 
dropped out at a very early period, 
since the LXX. could not possibly 
have rendered it ἠκούσθη ; a rendering, 
however, which several translators 
have adopted, from not adverting to 
the parallel passage above quoted.— 
ΜΌΝ is a formula of swearing ; but 
instead of a negative, it has a strongly 
affirmative meaning. See chap. xiv. 
24; Numb. xiv. 28; Josh. xiv. 9.—In 
yse, the is used τελικῶς, in the 
signification: “so that there shall 
not be.” 

10. Here the causes of the desolation 
are assigned—a complete failure of the 
vintage and harvest, and consequent 
famine. 12% was properly the yoke, 
by which two oxen were bound to- 
gether ; but it came to be used meta- 
phorically of the quantity of ground 
which they could plough in a day; 
and, as in the present instance, of 
such a quantity altogether irrespective 
of ploughing.—na, the bath, was a 
liquid measure, and, according to 
Josephus, Antiq. viii. 2, 9, contained 
seventy-two sextarii, or about seven 
gallons four pints of our measure. 
The ὙΠ, homer, was a dry measure 
equal to ten ephahs, Ezek. xlv. 11, and 
is not to be confounded with the 79%, 


omer, which was only the tenth part of 
an ephah. The 728 was likewise a dry 
measure, and according to Josephus, 
Antiq. xv. 9,2, was equal to the 
Attic medimnus, or about six pecks, 
corresponding to the bath in liquids. 
A succession of such seasons as that 
here threatened, must have produced 
universal ruin. 

11,12. The participles, 7202 and. 
“ms, are used adverbially. For the 
prefixing of 2 before the second of two 
nouns in construction, see chap. 1x. 2; 
xxi, 13. From this passage, and 
Eccles. x. 16, 17, we see that early 
drinking was considered by the Jews, 
as it was by the Romans, a mark of 
the most depraved sensuality. Bet- 
ween 12% and 1" there is this difference, 
that while the latter is never used of 
any other liquor than the produce of 
the grape, the former is employed to 
denote any kind of inebriating liquor, 
whether prepared from grapes, or from 
dates, barley, or honey. It is, how- 
ever, the stronger of the two terms, 
and seems purposely placed in con- 
nexion with the morning, in order to 
aggravate the abandoned character of 
the drunkards here described. The 
Targum renders it: PY Von, old wine. 
As 2 signifies the morning as well as 
the evening ¢wilight, some interpreters 
adopt the former signification ; but 
from the contrast here presented, it is 
better to understand it of the evening, 
—only carrying forward the idea to 
that of night, as chap. xxi. 4; lix. 10. 


LXX. τὸ ὀψέ. Syr. PCE vesper. 


Comp. Prov. xxiii. 30, and the quota- 
tion in Gesenius from the Book of 


CHAP. V.| 


ISATAH. 


41 


13 Therefore my people are led captive at unawares ; 


Their nobility are starvelings, 


And their multitude are parched with thirst. 
14 Therefore Sheol enlarges its appetite, 
And gapes immeasurably with its mouth ; 
And down go her nobility and her multitude, 
Her noisy throng, and whoever was in her that exulted. 


Adam, ver. 20, where the same Syriac 
word, |#S03, occurs. The ellipsis of 


a must be supplied. For the use of 
musical instruments at feasts, see Job 
xxi. 12, and Amos vi. 3—6, a passage 
strikingly parallel with the present, 
and beautifully illustrated in a drawing 
taken from a tomb at Thebes, in Wil- 
kinson’s Ancient Egyptians, vol. 1. p. 
222. The sensual Jews, in the time 
of the prophet, appear to have em- 
ployed musicians, and all kinds of 
merry-makers, as dancers, mimics, 
buffoons, &c. such as are still common 
all over the East. Sensual indulgences 
steel the heart against religious im- 
pressions, and cause their victims to 
sport on the very brink of ruin. This 
is implied in the last clause of the 
verse, in which its effect is stated to 
be inattention to alarming dispensa- 
tions of Divine Providence. 

13. To describe the certainty of the 
event, the prophet represents the Jews 
as already carried away into captivity ; 
and to express the suddenness of the 
calamity, and its overtaking them 
while carelessly occupied with their 
festive enjoyments, he employs the 
phrase, ΠΟΥ 30, It is true this phrase 
means ignorance as the cause of cala- 
mity, Hos. iv. 6; but there the article 
is inserted, and the connexion obvi- 
ously requires this construction ;— 
whereas in the present case, the cause 
being referred to by the use of 723, at 
the beginning of the verse, the idea 
of suddenness or unexpectedness is 
more appropriate. Comp. Ps. xxxv. 
8; Jud. xx. 34; Jer. 1. 24.—113, glory, 
abstr. for concrete; zobility, nobles, 
Comp. chap. viii. 7; x. 3. IPN, men 
of starvation, for starvelings, as X)O°T7, 
men of falsehood, for false or deceitful ; 
“Boon, men of number, for few, το. 
This noun has no singular, except in 


compound names, in which it is also 


Comp. GBT, 


maritus, in the Ethiopic version of the 
Polyg. Matt.i.19. The punctuation 
Ὁ, dead, of famine, adopted by Mi- 
chaelis and some others, after the 
Targ. is to be rejected on account of 
its not agreeing so well with the 
phrase, 822 az, in the following 
hemistich. The reading 793, instead 
of xo, found in the Heb. Bible of Van 
der Hooght, and in that of Forster, 
which follows it, is not in any MS. nor 
in any other printed editions. 

14, 3x0. Various derivations have 
been offered of this word. Some 
propose 988, fo ask, demand, comparing 
Prov. xxx. 15,16, with oreusrapaz, Catull. 
11. 28, 29, and ἁρπακτὴρ, Callim. ep. ii. 
6; others derive it from the Arab. 


Ls, or ο) ὦ, to sink down, descend; 


and appeal for support to the Chald. 
m0, fundum, imum ret. Gesenius thinks 
it is put for ἦν, which he renders 
cavity, a hollow subterranean place, and 
invests both ‘x, and %, with the 
signification of being hollow, though 
he is unable to produce any instances 
of actual usage in support of it. See 
on the subject, Scheid’s very learned 
Dissert. in Canticum Hiskize, pp. 20— 
43. But whatever difficulty there may 
be in settling the derivation of the 
term, there is little in determining its 
application in the Hebrew Scriptures, 
in which it is used with the same 
latitude of signification as the Greek 
“Adns—designating the invisible place or 
abode of the dead, the locality or condi- 
tion to which all are removed on 
leaving this world. As it includes 
the grave to which the body is re- 
moved at death, it came to be con- 
ceived and spoken of as situateddn or 
below the earth, ὑποκάτω τῆς γῆς, Rev. 


found in the Punic, 


42 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. Y. 


The man of mean condition is bowed down, 


And the man of rank is brought low; 
And the eyes of the haughty are humbled. 


But Jehovah of Hosts is exalted through justice, 


And the Holy God is sanctified through righteousness. 


The lambs shall feed wherever they are driven, 


And the waste fields of the rich, strange flocks shall consume. 


Wo to them that draw calamity with cords of iniquity, 


And punishment as with the ropes of a cart. 


19 
may sce it ; 


v. 3; and such as inhabit it are called 
καταχθονίοι, those who inhabit the under- 
world, Phil. ii, 10. It was regarded as 
a vast and profound subterranean 
region, the entrance to which was 
furnished with gates and bars, into 
which men went down, and from 
which there was no return to the 
present world. In this verse, Sheol 
(which I have retained in the transla- 
tion, it being the original term, and 
quite as intelligible as the exotic 
Greek, Hades) is represented by one 
of the boldest prosopopeias as a 
hideous monster, with an immense 
mouth and insatiableappetite, swallow- 
ing down greedily a whole nation, and 
all that pertained to it. For other 
sublime poetical representations of 
Sheol, see chap. xiv. 9—20; Ezek. 
xxvi. 20; xxxi. 14—18; xxxii. 18—32. 
The prediction received its fulfilment 
when Nebuchadnezzar carried the 
Jews into captivity in Babylon, and 
left none but the poor of the people, 
that had nothing, in the land. 2 Chron. 
xxxvi. 20; Jer. xxxix. 10. Between the 
description of the sin, the punishment 
‘of which is here threatened, and the 
language describing the punishment 
itself, there exists a striking analogy. 
Those who indulged in feasting, drink- 
ing, and jollity, were to be subject to 
famineand thirst,and to become food for 
the rapacious enemy. The fem. suff. 5, 
in the last instances, refers to Zion 
understood. Before ty, subaud. Wx. 
15, 16. The language of these verses 
is nearly parallel with that of chap. 
ii. 9,11, 17. The humiliation of the 
wicked by the infliction of Divine 


That say: Let him be quick, let him hasten his work that we 


judgments, and the glory accruing to 
Jehovah from the same, is the subject 
common to both—ti72. God is said 
to be sanctified when the holiness of 
his character is displayed, acknow- 
ledged, or proclaimed. Such is emi- 
nently the result of the just punish- 
ment of his enemies. 

17. This verse describes the con- 
sumption of the deserted estates of 
the wealthy Jews, by the flocks of the 
nomadic tribes, for whose entrance 
into the country way should be made 
by the removal of the inhabitants.— 
D779, the regular infin., with suffix, of 
Wy, to drive flocks or herds out to pasture. 
Comp. Micah ii. 12. Much the same 
meaning is expressed by Lowth, who 
renders “without restraint,’ but his 
version does not give the exact force 
of the Hebrew.—The conjectural em- 
endation of 093 into Ὁ 3, which the 
Bishop adopts, after Durell and 
Secker, is quite unwarranted: the 
plural of 73 being 0773, and not 073, 
There can be little doubt that ἄρνες, 
of the LXX., was suggested by Ὁ Ὁ39 
occurring immediately before. Symm. 


mar oO 

has πάροικοι; the Syr. [okos, pere- 
grint; and the Vulg. advene; but 072 
being parallel with 029, it must be 
interpreted of flocks, and not of per- 
sons.—D'M9, fat ones,i. e. rich persons, 
like yyw 2t3, the fat of the earth, Ps. 
XXxli. 30. 

18, 19. In Heb. the words ΤῊΝ, 7837, 
neon, iv, ὅσο. signify not only szz, iné- 
quity, &c. but also punishment, calamity, 
misery, a8 the consequences of moral 
evil. Ps. xxxi. 11; Prov. xxii. 8 ; Isa. 


CHAP. Υγ.] 


ISAIAH. 


43 


And let the purpose of the Holy One of Israel draw near and 


come, that we may know it. 


20 Wo to those that call evil good, and good evil, 
That put darkness for light, and light for darkness ; 
That put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter. 

21 Wo to them that are wise in their own eyes, 

And prudent in their own estimation. 


xl. 2; Lam. 111. 39; Zech. xiv. 19; and 
such would seem to be the signification 
of ἣν, and πρῖθττ, in this passage. The 
idea of drawing out, or continuing in 
the practice of sin, and thereby accu- 
mulating it, like a rope-maker, who 
continually adds to his materials, first 
suggested by Houbigant, and approved 
by Lowth, is quite forced :—having no 
other ground than the simple occur- 
rence of the terms cords and ropes; 
which are manifestly spoken of as 
implements, by the use of which the 
action was performed, and not them- 
selves the subjects of the operation. 
Besides, it is at variance with the 
following context. The meaning is, 
that the persons described were not 
satisfied with ordinary modes of pro- 
voking the Diety, and the consequent 
ordinary approach of his vengeance, 
but, as it were, yoked themselves in 
the harness of iniquity, and putting 
forth all their strength, drew down 
upon themselves with accelerated speed 
the load of punishment which their 
sins deserved.—Instead of "2273, ove of 
De Rossi’s MSS., the LXX., Arab., Aq., 
Symm., Theod., and the Syr. read 
“m3; and, on the contrary, instead of 
maya, fourteen MSS., and probably two 
others, and the printed edit. of Soncin. 
have ni1¥2; but the change makes little 
or no difference in the sense, and the 
one preposition is very frequently 
understood in connexion with the 
other. Were it not that it is wholly 
unsupported by critical evidence, the 
conjecture might be hazarded, that in 
nov, the 1 has taken the place of }, (a 
mistake very easily made by a tran- 
scriber,) and that the word originally 
read ADP, wickedness—in which case 
the passage would stand thus :— 


NUT wana PPT wa A 
ΤΉΝΕ TW MAY?) 


“Wo to them who draw calamity with 
cords of iniquity, 

And punishment with ropes of wick- 

kedness.” 


There would thus be a perfection in 
the parallelism, which is at present 
wanting; but the same sense is 
brought out by the present reading of 
the text, which is that of all the MSS. 
and versions.—The language of the 
19th verse is. the only construction 
that could be put upon the conduct 
of the wicked Jews, spoken of in that 
which precedes it. They scoffingly 
dared the Holy One to carry his 
threatenings into execution. Comp. 
chap. xxviil. 14, 15; Jer. xvii. 15. The 
7 in TOTP, is a rare instance of the 
Optative mood in the third person 
of a verb. 

20, 21. The Article is understood as 
repeated before Dnw. Gesen. in his 
Commentary, refers to a passage re- 
markably parallel in the Zabian Book 
of Adam, published by Prof. Norberg. 
of Lund, 1815. The following is a 
translation ; “‘ Wo to them that are self- 
wise, and, in their own view, men of pru- 
dence. Wo to them who say, We belong to 
the light, but the light is not with them, 
and whose heart he hath abandoned, cut 
off, and taken away! Wo to them that 
turn sweet to bitter, and bitter to sweet / 
Wo to them that say of good, tt 15 evil, 
and place evil on a par with good! Wo 
to them who turn darkness into light, and 
light into darkness! Wo to them who 
early drink new wine, and in the evening 
drink that which is old, and are capti- 
vated with the song, the lyre, and the 
pipe.” The agreement of the passage 
with verses 20, 21, and 11, of this 
chapter, is too glaring to admit of a 
doubt that it was partly copied from 
it, and partly an imitation. 


22 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. V. 


Wo to them that are valiant to drink wine, 


And men of might to mix strong drink. 


24 


That justify the guilty for a reward, 
And deprive the just of their 
Therefore as the flame of fire consumeth the stubble, 


right. 


And as the burning hay falleth in ; 
So shall their root be as rottenness, 
And their blossom shat go up like dust: 
Because they have despised the law of Jehovah of Hosts, 
And contemned the word of the Holy One of Israel. 
25 Wherefore the anger of Jehovah burneth against his people, 


commonly applied to military men, 
and indicate extraordinary power and 
heroism.—20 702?. When the He- 
brews speak of mixing wine, the mean- 
ing is not that it was diluted with 
water, and thus made weaker, but 
that it had spices and strong drugs 
added to it, by which it was rendered 
more potent and stupifying. Comp. 
J22, spiced wine, Ps, xxv. 9; the synony- 
mous 332, Song vil. 3; JO22, Prov. 
xxiii. 30; κεκεράσμενον ἄκρατον, Rey. 
xiv. 10; and Lowth’s note on chap. i. 
22. 

93. For oI, one of De Rossi’s 
MSS., two printed editions, the LXX., 
Syr., Arab., and Vulg. read p32; and 
an accurate Span. Cod. of De Rossi, 
ΒΞ, but obviously emendations, in- 
troduced for the purpose of making 
the word agree with 3239, in the sin- 
gular, at the end of the verse. It is 
not unusual, however, for a sentence 
first to have a plural, and then to 
exhibit a singular, for the sake of 
emphatically stating, that what is pre- 
dicated affects each of the persons or 
things included in the whole multitude. 
The verse describes the corruption of 
the judges by bribery, and the injustice 
consequent upon it. 

24. Now commences a specification 
of the punishment to be inflicted on 
the profligate and abandoned charac- 
ters that had just been described. 
Hitzig properly remarks, that this and 
the following verse run parallel with 
verses 13 and 14, as the use of }2¥, 
and yy, sufficiently shows.—'Xsx jw), 
“tongue of fire,” used metaphorically 


for flame, on account of its lambent 


and pointed appearance. Arab. οἷον 


Je » Flamma, pec. fumi expers. Castel 


and Gol. Comp. Acts ii. 3.—Contrary 
to the usual construction, Ὁ is intro- 
duced between the verb and its nomi- 
native; which Kimchi accounts for 
on the principle, that where the sub- 
ject of discourse is so self-evident that 
there can be no mistake, the object 
may be placed before the agent. 
Similar instances occur of a word 
interposed between the Infin. Const. 
and its genitive, as chap. xx. 1; lxiv. 
1. ww occurs only here and chap. 
Comp. the Arab. Un we 
hay or dry grass. The radical idea 
conveyed by ΠΕΡῚ seems to be that of 
falling off, or down, failing, sinking 
through imbecility. It is here used 
to express the falling together, or 
sinking down of bundles of dry hay 
by the action of fire upon them.—?9, 
rottenness, for ‘rotten wood,’ which, 
when mouldered and dry, is blown 
away like dust. All the images here 
employed, forcibly represent the sud- 
denness, ease, and completeness with 
which God effects the destruction of 
the wicked. How firmly soever they 
may be established, and how great 
soever their splendour, they at once 
come to nothing when his judgments 
are let loose upon them. Comp. Amos 
ii. 9; Hosea ix. 16. 

25. Some refer the agitation of the 
mountains to the earthquake which 
happened in the days of Uzziah, Amos 


Xxxiii. 1]. 


CHAP V.| 


ISATAH. 


45 


He hath stretched out his hand against them and smitten them: 
So that the mountains tremble, 

And their carcases are as filth in the midst of the streets. 
Nevertheless his anger is not turned back, 

But his hand is stretched out still. 


26 


For he raiseth a banner to the distant nations, 


And whistleth for them from the end of the earth; 
And, behold, speedily and fleetly they come. 
27 None is faint, and none among them stumbleth ; 


i. 1; Zech. xiv. 5; but it is nothing 
more than a strong poetical image, of 
frequent occurrence. Comp. Ps. xviii. 
7; Joel ii. 10—2 in 03 is not radical, 
as Kimchi and others have supposed, 
but the Caph of comparison. The 
root is πῦρ, the same as M0, fo sweep 
away filth; hence HD, ND, sweepings, 
filth; Chald. snd, ordure. 'The scene 
here depicted is that which is wit- 
nessed when the plague is raging in a 
city, or immediately after a siege 
which has made awful havoc of the 
inhabitants.— The verse concludes 
with a formula which is thrice re- 
peated in the ninth, and once in the 
tenth chapter, to intimate the continu- 
ance of Divine judgments, and prepare 
the reader for what follows. 

26. Without naming the Assyrian 
army, the prophet proceeds to de- 
scribe its appearance, which he repre- 
sents to be most formidable and terri- 
fic—d) is properly ὦ signal flay or 
banner, but is used also for the stand- 
ard from which it was displayed. 
Reference is made to the military 
custom of planting a pole with a flag 
on a high mountain; either to serve 
as a signal of rendezvous, or to point 
out the direction in which an army is 
to proceed, The latter is here in- 
tended. See Cesar de Bel. Gal. lib. 
ii. cap. 10; Ammian. in Hist. Valentin. 
lib. xxvii. cap. 10.—In the use of 7p 
is a metaphor borrowed from the 
practice of those who keep bees in 
the East, and in some countries of 
Europe ; calling them out, and again 
gathering them and bringing them 
back to the hive by the blast of a 
whistle. Thus Cyril: Δέχεται δὲ καὶ 
τούτο πάλιν, ὡς ἀπό γε THs συνεθείας τῆς 
ἐπὶ τῶν μυιῶν. Ἔν ἔθει γάρ πώς ἐστι 


τοῖς μελισσοκόμοις συρίζειν αὐταῖς" 
οὕτω τε τῶν σίΐίμβλων ἀποφέρειν εἰς 
ἄνθη, καὶ πόας, καὶ μὴν καὶ ἀνακομίζειν 
ἐξ ἀγρὼν οἰκοί τε αὐτὰς ἐναυλίζεσθαι 
ποιεῖν. The same metaphor is em- 
ployed chap. vii. 18, and Zech. x. 8. 
The word is onomatopoetic.—pinjn, 
απ m7. Though the former of these 
two descriptions of distance may, 
without any violence, be viewed as 
applicable to the Assyrians, it has 
been thought that the latter is alto- 
gether forced, if thus applied. But 
the objection loses its validity when 
it is recollected that the geographical 
knowledge of the Hebrews was com- 
paratively very limited, and that when 
they spoke of “the ends of the earth,” 
it was the earth as known to them. 
Yet such a mode of describing distant 
regions was not peculiar to the He- 
brews. Thucydides, writing of the 
Medes, the very people here referred 
to, employs phraseology identical with 
that used by Isaiah : τόν re yap Μῆδον 
αὐτοὶ ἴσμεν ἐκ περάτων γῆς πρότερον 
ἐπὶ τὴν Πελοπόννησον ἐλθόντα, κ. τ. λ. 
i. 22, And Livy says of the Gauls: 
“ab oceano fterrarum ultimis oris bel- 
lum ciente,” v. 37. See Gesenius iz 
loc—%. It is not unusual in Heb. to 
introduce a person or thing in the way 
of pronominal reference, without any 
previous mention of the person or 
thing specifically. The singular form 
may be explained as referring to each 
of the 03, taken singly; or it may 
point them out as a congregated mass, 
marching forward under the command 
of their leader. The velocity with 
which the enemy was to approach 
exactly meets the challenge of the 
scofters, ver. 19. 

27, rs iw, By this is not meant 


Ἐ 


46 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. Y. 


They neither slumber nor sleep ; 
The girdle of their loins is not loosed, 
Nor is the latchet of their shoes untied. 


28 Their arrows are sharpened, 


And all their bows are bent; 


The hoofs of their horses are counted as flint, 
And their wheels as the whirlwind. 


29 


Their roar is like that of the lioness ; 


They roar like the young lions ; 


the girdle usually worn by the Orientals 
round the waist for the purpose of 
keeping their clothes close together 
about the body, when they are at 
work, or ona journey; but the ζωστὴρ, 
or military belt with which soldiers 
were accoutred. It was tightly girded 
round the loins, for the sake of sup- 
porting and strengthening the person, 
and had attached to it the sheath 
which contained the sword. Gesenius 
would refer the loosing of the girdles, 
and the untying of the latchet, to the 
removal of obstacles which present 
themselves in the way of an army ; 
but it seems much more natural to 
regard them as applying to the neces- 
sary preparation for enjoying the 
repose mentioned in the words imme- 
diately preceding. The meaning is, 
that the Assyrians would march for- 
ward without any intermission. : 

28. The bow and arrow were very 
ancient weapons of offence. Gen. xxi. 
20; xlix. 23. The bow was made of 
wood, reeds, horn, and other materials ; 
and was often so strong, that it re- 
quired to be trodden upon in order to 
make it bend. Hence the phrase 71 
mop, to tread the bow; the Pah. Part. of 
which verb is used, with such refer- 
ence, in the present verse. The fol- 
lowing quotation from Arrian will 
furnish a sufficient description of this 
custom. Speaking of the Indian in- 
fantry, he says: ᾿Αλλ᾽ οἱ μὲν πεζοὶ 
αὐτοῖσι τόξον τε ἔχουσιν ἰσόμηκες τῷ 
φορέοντι τὸ τόξον" καὶ τοῦτο κάτω ἐπὶ 
τὴν γῆν θέντες, καὶ τῷ ποδὶ τῷ ἀριστερῷ 
ἀντιβάντες, οὕτως ἐκτοξευουσι τὴν νευρὴν 
ἐπὶ μέγα ὀπίσω ἀπαγαγόντες. Hist, 
Ind. xvi. Comp. also Diod. Sic. iii. 8; 
Curt. viii. 14, 19; Ovid. Metam. v. 
‘883; Xenoph, Anab. iv. 2, 28.— 2, the 


same as WY, a stone—so called from its 
compactness and solidity; but, as all 
stones are not possessed of this qua- 
lity, the spirit of the passage requires 
that it should be rendered flint or 
adamant; UXX. στερεὰ πέτρα.---- τι, 
to reckon, count, estimate, is here used 
idiomatically, and is equivalent to the 
substantive verb. As the ancients did 
not shoe their horses, as we do, hard- 
ness of hoof was considered to be a 
primary quality of a good horse. 
Hence the Homeric χαλκόποδ᾽ ἵππω, 
Tliad, 6. 41; and κρατερώνυχες ἵπποι; ᾿ 
and the following passage, quoted by 
Gesenius from Montanabbi, shews 
that, at a later period, the same 
Tapes was attached to it in the 
ast : 


ep lal) esl, LS ah ths 
Lh all oo be 


“ They rise with the hoofs of their forefeet, 

So that as often as they strike against the 
rocks, 

They impress upon them the breast of the 
falcon ; 

Though they go barefoot.” 


mmo2, The rapidity with which the 
Assyrians advanced is beautifully ex- 
pressed, by comparing the revolution 
of the wheels of their war-chariots to 
that of the sudden whirlwind, which 
seizes upon all within its reach, and, 
rolling it up with indescribable velo- 
city, bears it into the air. 

29. Here the enemy is described 
under the metaphor of a lioness, 
accompanied by her young ones, first 
roaring on reaching the prey, then 
seizing it, and carrying it safely away 


CHAP. VI.] 


ISATAH. 


41 


They both growl and seize the prey ; 
They bear it safely away, and there is none to rescue. 
30 And they shall roar at them in that day, like the roaring of the 


sea ; 


So that if one look to the land, behold there is afflictive darkness, 
And the light is darkened by its clouds. 


to her den. 28% is properly used of 
the full-grown, and ἘΠῚ of the young 
lion—the one signifying ¢o roar, and 
the other, ¢o growl; though they are 
sometimes interchanged. 

30. To enhance the terrors of the 
description given of the attack of the 
invader, a sea-storm on the west coast 
of Palestine is introduced. The trans- 
ition from the roaring or growling of 
the lions, to that of the sea, was quite 
natural. Comp. Jer. 1.42. Nor were 
the phenomena on such occasions 
confined to the Mediterranean: the 
storm, sweeping over the land, the 
entire horizon would be involved in 
the densest gloom. A striking picture 
of the political horizon of the Jews, 
on the Assyrian invasion.—Consider- 
able diversity has obtained in the 
interpretation of the latter half of 
this verse. There is no sufficient 
reason to suppose, with Lowth, a 


rendering in the LXX., and the Coptic 
made from it, being in all probability 
an emendation, which owed its origin 
to an attempt to produce complete 
‘uniformity between this, and the 
parallel passage, chap. vill. 22. 817%, 
Gesenius renders zow terror, now light, 
but quite at variance with the spirit of 
the text, which requires a state of 
profound darkness, without any reliev- 
ing glimpses of light. The preferable 
construction is that, which, setting 
aside the authority of the accents, 
connects W with 7, immediately 
preceding, and then makes ix the 
nominative to the verb 7%, which 
follows it. 1 TS, will thus be aflictive 
darkness —By x, light, is meant the 
sun, as the source of light. Comp. 
Job xxxi. 26; Hab. ii. 4. The 7 in 
mony, refers to YIs—the clouds here 
mentioned being those by which the 
land was covered during the storm, 


corruption of the text: the different 


CHAPTER VI. 


Interpreters have been much divided respecting the occasion of this vision: 
some referring it to what they consider to have been the solemn inaugura- 
tion of Isaiah to his prophetical office ; while others are of opinion, that it 
was vouchsafed to him when about to receive a new and special commission. 
In support of the former hypothesis, which seems best sustained, it is alleged, 
that the specification of the date, “in the year in which King Uzziah died,” 
which must mean Jefore, and not after that event, exactly coincides with the 
date, chap. i. 1; that all the circumstances of the vision were specially 
adapted to impress the mind of the prophet with feelings suitable to be 
cherished when entering on the functions of his office ; that if he had been 
previously invested with it, there does not appear to have been anything so 
peculiar in a new commission as to require such extraordinary interposition ; 

- that commissions of a similarly express nature were given to the prophets 


48 


ISAIAH. [CHAP. VI. 


Jeremiah and Ezekiel, at the commencement of their prophetical career ; 
and, especially, that the latter of these two prophets was likewise favoured 
with a sublime and august vision on the important occasion. The circum- 
stance of the account of Isaiah’s vision not standing at the beginning of the 
book, is of no consequence; it being admitted, that many portions of the 
prophetical books are not placed in the exact order of time. 

This chapter contains the description of a sublime vision, with which the 
prophet was favoured, 1—4; the effect which it produced upon him, 5; the 
supernatural relief afforded to his mind, 6, 7; his commissicn to announce 
the obstinacy of the Jews, notwithstanding their continued enjoyment of 
the means of instruction, 8—10; their dispersion in consequence of such 
conduct, 11, 12; and the merciful reservation of a remnant to serve as the 
stock of a new race, whose history would furnish fresh displays of the 


Divine glory, 13. 


1 In the year in which Uzziah the king died, I saw Jehovah, sitting 
upon a high and elevated throne, and his train filled the temple. 


1. way—ninnmwa. In the year of the 
death, το. Comp. chap. xiv. 28, where 
the same phraseology occurs. That in 
both cases reference is made to what 
transpired previous to the death of the 
king, 15 obvious—since it would other- 
wise have been said, that it happened 
in the first year of his successor. We 
are not informed during how many 
months of the concluding year of 
Uzziah’s reign Isaiah prophesied. It 
is quite sufficient to justify the state- 
ment, chap. i. 1, if he commenced the 
functions of his office before the de- 
cease of that monarch. In order, 
indeed, to afford a wider scope for 
his labours, several interpreters, both 
Jewish and Christian, have supposed, 
that the death here spoken of was not 
the zxatural, but the civil death of 
Uzziah, when he was smitten with the 
leprosy, and laid aside from public 
duty; but such an idea would pro- 
bably never have been started, but for 
a mistaken rendering of the verb 
0272, in the fifth verse. Instead of 
translating it, I am undone, or I perish, 
they give it, I was reduced to silence, 
and imagine the meaning to be, that 
Isaiah had been compelled to suspend 
his prophecy during the whole period 
of the king’s seclusion. Some have 
even maintained that his silence was 
a punishment inflicted on him for not 
reproving Uzziah: but who does not 


perceive that all this is mere fancy, 
and totally unworthy of scriptural 
interpretation ἢ The } in 77x}, has 
more of a temporal than a conjunctive 
power. It is equivalent to 3s, then it 
was that, το. ΤΣ is to be taken in 
the prophetic acceptation, denoting a 
supernatural perception of the objects 
specified. The things constituting the 
symbols of the vision, the prophet 
did not behold with his bodily eyes. 
He was in a state of ecstatic inspira- 
tion, and had the things signified by 
such symbols vividly impressed upon 
his mind. See my Lectures on 
“Divine Inspiration,’ pp. 157—165. 
——rs. There can be little doubt 
that this Divine name has been 
substituted in the present verse, and 
in verses 8th and 11th, for 77. The 
latter name is found here in ninety-four 
of Kennicott and De Rossi’s MSS., 
and has originally stood in zize more; 
it is found in eighty, and has originally 
stood in ¢ex more, ver. 8th; and it is 
in nearly as many in the third in- 
stance. It is besides found in some 
of the early printed editions. The 
rendering of the Targum is "187M, 
the glory of the Lord; of which the 
Evangelist John clearly avails himself, 
when, speaking of the Lord Jesus 
Christ, he says, “These things said 
Esaias, when he saw τὴν δόξαν αὐτοῦ, 
HIS GLORY, and spake of HIM,” chap. 


CHAP. VI.] 


ISAIAH. 


49 


2 Seraphs stood beside him: each had six wings; with two he 
covered his face, with two he covered his feet, and with two he 


y_ > did fiz: 


xii. 41. The person who appeared 
to the prophet was the Divine Logos, 
the Brightness of the Father’s glory, 
and the Express Image of his Person, 
Heb. i. 2.——-8w7) 0] may be referred 
to ‘8 as their antecedent, and they 
are thus used chap. lvii. 15; but the 
more natural mode of construction in 
this place requires us to connect them 
with x2, the immediate antecedent. 
Thus the Targ., LXX., Symm., Cover- 
dale, and most moderns.—As 527 is 
used poetically for heaven, Ps. xi. 4; 
xviii. 7, Michaelis and others have 
supposed, that the scene of the pro- 
phet’s vision was the celestial world. 
It seems more appropriate, however, 
to take it in its ordinary acceptation, 
as designating the temple of Jerusa- 
lem, especially since express mention 
is made of the altar, 72927, ver. 6, as 
something familiarly known. The 
term properly signifies ὦ capacious and 
magnificent building, and is used_of the 
royal palace at Babylon, chap. xxxix. 


7; Dan. i. 4; Arab. Ji, from 
Ji, to be great, immense in size; 


Φ » 
Ethiop. USA; Syr. flasn. It 
commonly denotes the temple at Je- 
rusalem in general; but sometimes it 
is employed to designate the body or 
large middle part of the building, 
usually called the Holy place, in con- 
tradistinction from V2], the oracle, or 
Holy of Holies, and Dax, the vestibule 
or porch erected at the entrance; 
the space between which it occupied, 
and contained the golden candlestick, 
the altar of incense, and the table of 
shew-bread. Between it and the 
Holy of Holies was a double veil, 
which was never drawn aside except 
once a year, to admit the high priest, 
who alone enjoyed the privilege of 
appearing before the mercy-seat.— 
Though we never find x03, throne, 
employed to designate the mercy- 
seat, yet it may be regarded as applied 
to it in this place, inasmuch as the 
phrase DIT IW, dwelling or sitting 


enthroned between the cherubim, 1 
Sam. iv. 4,15 descriptive of the visible 
glory of Jehovah, as displayed from 
it, above the ark of the covenant, 
which the two cherubim overshadowed 
with their wings, Exod. xxv. 20—22. 
—While God vouchsafed to this spot 
the peculiar symbol of his presence, 
his glory filled the great body of the 
temple, 1 Kings viii. 11. This glory 
Isaiah calls Yaw, his train, or the long 
flowing skirts of his royal robe, in 
allusion to the ample robes of state 
in which Oriental monarchs appeared 
on great occasions. 

2, DY. The scenery of the vision 
being taken from the temple, it is 
manifest, the Seraphs, or living beings 
here described, can be no other than 
the antitypes of the golden o’n3, 
cherubs, which were stationed, one on 
either end of the mercy-seat, covering 
it with their wings. They correspond 
to the four living creatures in the 
vision of Ezekiel, between which and 
that of Isaiah, are several striking 
points of coincidence: only the former 
is fuller, and contains many more par- 
ticulars. A somewhat similar vision 
was accorded to the apostle John, 
Rey. iv.; but the four ζῶα, or living 
creatures, there described, are an 
appropriation of the symbols spoken 
of by Ezekiel, to the Christian minis- 
try, agreeably to the special scope of 
the Apocalypse. There is, therefore, 
no necessity, with Michaelis, Gesenius, 
and others, to derive mv from the 


Arab. pth, to be noble, whence 


. 


«-ο ὃ, a noble or prince; plur. 
tne, those who have descended 


from Mohammed ; and so to interpret 
the term as designating the celestial 
nobility, or the angels viewed as princes 
of state, attendant upon Jehovah. 
As the symbolical figures in the Holy 
of Holies were called 0293, cherubin, 
from their proximity to THE DIVINE 
PRESENCE—1}), from which the name 
is derived, being, as Hyde supposed, 


50 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. VI. 


3 And the one called to the other, and said: 
Holy, holy, holy, is Jehovah of hosts ; 
The whole earth is full of his glory. 


and as Gesenius now thinks not 
improbable, equivalent to 27, Ζο 
approach, draw near—so Isaiah appro- 
priates to the beings whom they re- 
presented, the name of D5qv, Seraphin, 
to denote their burning, or dazzling 
appearance. This idea was naturally 
suggested by the splendid effulgence 
of the golden cherubs, when they 
reflected the glory of the Lord. We 
are told, indeed, by Gesenius, that 
AW signifies fo burn, burn up, and not 
to shine, which holds true of the 
English verb ¢o burn, as well as of the 
Hebrew, if respect be simply had to 
the primary signification ; but it was 
just as natural for the Hebrews to 
apply the word in a secondary or 
translated sense, as it is for us to 
express by our word the excessive 
brightness proceeding from any lumi- 
nous object. Thus, also, in Scripture 
gems are called tx 22x, stones of fire, 
from their glittering appearance. 
What confirms this derivation of the 
term, is the description of the living 
creatures in the vision of Ezekiel: 
“their appearance was like durning 
coals of fire, and like the appearance 
of damps—and the fire was bright, and 
out of the fire went forth lightning,” 
chap. i. 13. The interpretation, there- 
fore, of Kimchi: Ὃν 28%, and Abul- 


walid: & yb Ko, angels of fire, or 


fiery angels, is not so far from the 
mark. To maintain, as Gesenius 
attempts to do, that the cherubim 
presented any thing of the appearance 
of serpents, and that an analogy is to 
be traced between them and the 
sacred serpents in the temple of 
Jupiter, at Thebes, is perfectly to 
degrade the subject. 

If the above interpretation be 
correct, it will be seen, that there is 
no foundation in Scripture for the 
opinion that Cherubim and Seraphim 
are distinct orders of angels. The 
two names are merely distinctive of 
two attributes attaching to the same 
order of beings—their zcarness to 
Jehovah, and the glorious effulgence of 


their celestial nature. Comp. Dan. 
vii. 10; Matt. xviii. 10; Luke x. 20. 

The Seraphim are represented as 
standing, to intimate their readiness 
to execute the Divine behests. That 
Syn is to be rendered Jeside, and not 
above, or before, comp. 1 Kings xxii. 
19, where Y22 is explained by its being 
added, at his right hand and at his left. 
The two passages are parallel, both in 
scene and phraseology—Though 0°33 
is pointed as a dual, it is not meant 
that each seraph had six pair of wings. 
In Hebrew things that naturally exist 
in pairs are expressed in the dual even 
when more than two are intended, 
See Zech. iii. 9. The repetition of the 
number of wings indicates distribution. 
To express the deep sense which the 
Seraphim cherished of their unworthi- 
ness to behold the Divine Majesty, 
they covered their faces, comp. Exod. 
lili. 6; and to mark their reverential 
respect, they also covered their feet, 
or the whole of the lower part of the 
body—a practice which obtains in the 
East, when persons approach the 
presence of a monarch: the attribu- 
tion to them of wings, and flying, 
teaches the velocity with which they 
execute their commissions; and to 
intimate that what is here ascribed to 
them is habitual and constant, the 
verbs are put in the future tense. 
See Gesen. Lehrgeb. p. 774. 

3. DIT wi wi. That these words 
were sung responsively by the Sera- 
phim is undeniable: whether one 
choir took up the first, another the 
second, and both joined in the third 
wiz, as Rosenmiiller supposes, cannot 
be determined. The triple use of the 
term has been considered as intended 
to intimate a Trinity in the Godhead. 
Thus Rabbi Joseph, in 7x “yx, fol. 
94. ἃ. 1. 24. Primam  sanctitatem 
respiscere e decem sephiris Coroxam 
Supremum; alteram Sapientiam; et 
tertiam Intelligentiam. It was also 
appealed to by the Fathers in proof 
of the Scripture doctrine of the 
Trinity ; and there are many who still 
view it in this light: but the trinary 


CHAP. VI.| 


ISAIAH. 


51 


4 And the foundations of the thresholds shook by reason of the 
voice of him who called, and the house was filled with smoke. 
5 Then I said: Alas for me! surely I am undone; for [am aman 


repetition of words in other passages, 
simply to express intensity, or superla- 
tiveness of degree, satisfactorily shews, 
that, according to the wsus loquendi, 
this is the meaning in the present in- 
stance. See Jer. vil. 4; xxil. 29; Ezek. 
xxi. 27 (Hebr.) 82. Musculus observes 
here: “Hee est doxologia angelica 
paucissimis verbis absoluta. Ardens 
est animus Deum veré laudantium, 
non multiloquus, multo minus batto- 
logus. Nec Deus ipse multiloquio, 
sed ardore fidei ac spiritus delectatur.” 
This angelic hymn is repeated, with 
certain variations, by the four living 
creatures, Rev. iv. 8. See Suicer, 
Thes. in voc. Tpicay. The primary 
idea conveyed by the term np, is 
that of separation, especially from 
what is common or profane to a special 
and sacred purpose. Hence the no- 
tions of sanctity, moral purity, infinite 
excellence and perfection. Τῦ 1s in this 
last and most exalted acceptation 
that it is used by the Seraphim. 
Ὑ123-- ἰδ, lit. the fulness of the whole 
earth is his glory; but the meaning is, 
that the earth is entirely filled with 
it; there being no object within its 
compass which does not proclaim the 
perfections of God. Ps. xix. 2, 3. 
The words appear to bear upon the 
scene described ver. 1, in which the 
train of Jehovah is said to have filled 
the temple. Comp. Hab. iii. 3; and 
for the phrase YIN? 87, Hamas., as 
quoted by Schultens, ad Conses. 
Harir. vi. p. 181. 


le οὐδ! sho kel elf 
sae 


“Fuit Chezaa plenitudo terre, qua late 
patet.” 

4. niax, bases, foundations. The 
most probable etymology of this word 
is that which refers it to the Arab, 


eet], Principia, radices, the plur. of 


ε mater, radix, principium, Gol.; in 


architecture, the solid stones, stretch- 
ing across the foot of a doorway, and 
supporting the 0D, sz//s or thresholds, 
which were based upon them. The 
LXX. take both terms together, and 
render, τὸ ὑπέρθυρον; the Vulg. super- 
liminaria cardinum; Vitringa, superli- 
minaria postium. The agreement in 
gender of the verb ὋΣ with D807, and 
not with nipx, the nearer noun, to 
which it otherwise properly belongs, 
is owing to the prominence which is 
given to the former, by its having 
the article prefixed, and its denoting 
the specia] objects in which the effects 
of the earthquake were visible.—m39, 
the same as 9277, ver. 1. Both were 
used of the tabernacle before the 
temple was built. See Joshua vi. 24; 
1 Sam. i. 7, 9; iii. 3. On the filling of 
the temple with smoke, comp. 1 Kings 
vili. 10,11; Ezek. x. 4, with Rev. xv. 8. 
5. 1273, the reading of the Textus 
Receptus, can only be derived from 
793, which, though in Kal it primarily 
signifies fo be still, silent, reduce to 
silence, is only used in Niphal in the 
sense of being destroyed, or perishing. 
From the circumstance, however, that 
sizty-two MSS. and originally siz more, 
the Brixian Bible, the Proph. of Son- 
cin. 1486, and seven other editions, 
omit the former of the two Yods, some 
refer it to D4 or 003, and render: 
1 am struck dumb, or, [ am silent. In 
support of this interpretation, they 
allege the rendering of the LXX. (in 
some copies,) Aquila, Theodotion, 
Symm., the Syr. and Vulg., and the 
authority of some of the rabbins. 
But it so happens that 077 is not at all 
in use ; and that, in Niphal, 023 never 
signifies to be silent, but always, to be 
destroyed, cut off, perish. Add to which, 
that °n273, pointed ‘7273, is pronounced 
precisely as ‘N’272, and is only one 
of the numerous instances of the 
scriptio defectiva. 'The prophet, ap- 
palled by the display which he saw 
of the Divine glory, the theme and 
loud peals of the seraphim, the con- 
cussions of the earthquake, and a sense 
of his own sinfulness, and that of his 


δ2 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. VI. 


of unclean lips, and I dwell among a people of unclean lips ; 


6 for mine eyes have seen the King, Jehovah of Hosts. 


And one 


of the seraphs flew to me, with a burning coal in his hand, 
7 which he had taken with tongs from off the altar; and he 
touched my mouth, and said: Behold, this hath touched thy 
lips: therefore thine iniquity is removed, and thy sin is forgiven. 
8 And I heard the voice of Jehovah, saying: Whom shall I 
send, and who will go for us? And I said: Here am I; 


nation, apprehended instant destruc- 
tion. This was quite inaccordance with 
the feelings of the ancient Hebrews, 
who were taught to expect immediate 
death, as the result of a vision of 
Jehovah. See Gen. xxxii. 30; Judges 
vi, 22, 23, 24; xiii. 22; and comp. 
Exod. xxxili. 20, the difference be- 
tween which and chap. xxiv. 10, 11, is 
not such as to warrant the conclusion 
of Gesenius, that the two chapters 
were written by different authors. In 
the one case, a perception of the Di- 
vine Hssence is meant, which is ex- 
pressly declared to be incompatible 
with the laws of mortal existence ; in 
the other, such a view of the external 
effulgence which accompanied the 
Divine manifestations, as was enjoyed 
by Moses, the patriarchs, and pro- 
phets of old, and by John under the 
new dispensation. The specification 
of the dips as the seat of impurity, 
appears to have arisen from the im- 
pression produced upon the mind of 
Isaiah by the celestial anthem, which 
he had just heard, and in which he felt 
he was totally unworthy to join; 
though the seraph who addresses him, 
ver. 7, would rather seem to adapt 
the phrase to the unfitness of the 
prophet to be engaged as a Divine 
messenger, till he had experienced the 
purifying influence there described. 

6. ΠΕΞῚ is properly a coal, or burning 
stone, ἃ χὰ δ, ‘ such as the Arabs use 


at this day for the purpose of baking 
their bread, or roasting, to which use 
reference is made in the phrase, Τὴν 
mes, a cake baked on glowing stones. 
1 Kings xix.6. Vulg. calculus ; but 
the LXX., Aquila., Symm., and Theod., 
ἄνθραξ, coal. From what follows, we 
learn that such stones were laid upon 


the altar in order to burn the sacri- 
fices. Before 722 supply Wx. 

7. The use of fire as the most 
powerful of all purifying agents, is 
adopted in Scripture as a symbol of 
the more important process of moral 
purification. Mal. iii. 2,3; Matt.iii. 11. 
The } in 1%) at once connects the 
words, and marks the izstantaneousness 
of the effect produced by the applica- 
tion of the symbol to the mouth 


of the prophet. 153, Arab. ,9$, eapi- 
avit crimen, signifies not only to expiate 
or atone for sin, by covering it with the 
matter of the atonement from the 
view of Him whose prerogative it is to 
punish it, but also, ¢o grant pardon for 
the sake of, and as the result of such 
atonement, 

8. Ὁ, The ancient versions of this 
word, with the exception of the Vulg., 
evince that their translators were per- 
plexed by it. The Syriac omits it alto- 
gether ; the LXX. has πρὸς τὸν λαὸν 
τοῦτον; and the Targ. TEN», fo teach ; 
though no Heb. MS. exhibits any 
various reading. The remark of Gese- 
nius, that Jerome is quite consistent 
in interpreting this plural form, as he 
does Gen. i. 26, xi. 7, of the Trinity, 
rather redounds to the honour, than 
reflects discredit on that father. In 
no other way has it ever been consist- 
ently interpreted. The hypothesis of 
a plural of majesty or excellence has 
never been satisfactorily established. 
It is neither in accordance with Scrip- 
ture, nor with general Oriental usage. 
No passage can be adduced from the 
Hebrew Scriptures, from which it can 
be proved that it was the practice of 
kings to speak of themselves indi- 
vidually in the plural number. See 
Ewald’s Heb, Gram, English Transl, 


GHAP. VI. | 


ISATAH. 


53 


9 send me. And he said: Go, and say to this people : 
Go on hearing, but understand not ; 
And go on seeing, but perceive not. 
10 Make the heart of this people fat ; 
And make heavy their ears, and close up their eyes ; 
Lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, 


And perceive with their heart, 


p. 231, where that profound scholar 
gives it as his deliberate opinion, that 
rt is a great error to suppose that the 
Heb. language, as we find it, has any 
feeling for a so-called plur. majestaticus. 
The idea of a consultation with other 
beings, Gen. i. 26, iii. 22, xi. 7, and 
in this verse, which Kimchi, Le Clerc, 
and others, advance in explanation, is 
rejected by Gesenius, Lehrgeb. p. 800; 
and both theories are decidedly repu- 
diated by Hitzig, who, unwilling, how- 
ever, to admit the doctrine of the 
Trinity, asserts, without any attempt 
at proof, that it is a mode of speech 
borrowed from common life. For an 
able discussion of the whole subject of 
plural attributions to the Deity, 1 refer 
the reader to the Rev. Dr. J. Pye 
Smith’s Script. Testimony to the Mes- 
siah, vol. i. pp. 464—495. Third Edit. 
9. viow wow, ὅσο. The construction 
of a finite verb with its infinitive fol- 
lowing, denotes continuity of action, 
The LXX. resolve the imperatives into 
futures, and their version is adopted 
Matt. xiii. 14, 15; Acts xxviii. 27. 
The use of 58, however, and not δ, 
shows that the following verbs, ὍΣ} 
and win, are not simply future, but 
are subject to the influence of the im- 
perative mood of those which precede ; 
yet so that the commands involve no 
external objective necessity. The lan- 
guage is not strictly and properly jus- 
sive, but proverbial in its character, 
and savours strongly of sacred irony, 
of which we have a decided instance, 
Matt. xxiil. 32. See also chap. xxix. 9. 
Similar proverbial forms, and some of 
them almost identical, are adduced in 
abundance by Wetstein ad Matt. xiii. 
13. 181, here, and Gen. xxvi. 28, for 
mx}, which is found in thirteen MSS. 
10. The imperatives, jot, 7207, 
yun, are declaratory in their import, 
agreeably to the language of the 


and turn, and be healed. 


Hebrew prophets, in which a person 
is often said to do or effect what he 
merely announces would take place. 
Comp. Gen. xxvii. 37 (comp 28) ; Jer. i. 
10; Ezek. xliii. 3; Hos. vi 5. The pas- 
sage, in effect, contains nothing more 
than a prediction of the obduracy of 
the Jews, and the consequences by 
which it would be followed: only it is 
expressed in a form which indicates 
strong feeling on the part of the 
speaker, and a persuasion that such 
would infallibly be their condition. 
This mode of speech is not uncommon 
even in modern languages, when a per- 
son in a state of excitement, wishing 
to intimate his conviction of the cer- 
tainty of any action of which he dis- 
approves, gives a peremptory order 
that it should be performed. There 
can be no doubt that the words were 
designed to apply to the Jews in the 
days of the prophet ; yet the descrip- 
tion being equally appropriate in its 
application to their character as a 
people, from that time forward, we 
find the prophecy quoted or referred 
to both by our Lord, and by Paul, as 
receiving its accomplishment in their 
days. Comp. Matt. xiii. 14, 15; Mark 
iv. 12; Luke viii.10; John xi. 40; 
Acts xxvill. 25—27.—207, to make fat ; 
so to surround with fat, as to render 
insensible to external influence: meta- 
phor. ¢o make stupid, unfeeling, and stub- 
born. See for the use of the verb in 
Kal. Deut. xxxii. 15 ; Jer. v. 28.—1334, 
likewise metaphor. applied, denotes 
heaviness or dulness of perception, a want 
of susceptibility and attention to 
instruction —vw7, fo smear over with 
viscous matter, close up; Root, rv, 
Aram. vy, «70 smear, blind; LUXX. 
ἐκάμμυσαν; Vulg. claude— indicates 
the most obstinate determination to 
shut out the light of truth from the 
mind, Comp. Lucian, Nig. 19: μηδὲ 


G 


δ4 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. VI. 


11 Then I said, How long, O Jehovah? And he said, 
Till the cities be made desolate, without an inhabitant, 
And the houses without a man, 

And the land become utterly desolate, 

12 And Jehovah have removed men afar off, 

And the forsaking be great in the midst of the land. 

13 And though there should still be in it a tenth part, 
Even it shall again be burnt up; 


τὰ ὦτα κηρῷ φραξάμενον, add ἀκούοντα, 
καὶ AeAvpevov.—Before 122 subaud. 3, 
which is supplied in upwards of 
twenty MSS. and two of the earliest 
printed editions. Its being expressed, 
however, inthe LXX., Syr., Chald. and 
Vulg., is no proof of its having been 
in the text from which they were 
made, as the translators might, in 
common with others, have found it 
necessary to supply it in their ver- 
sions. In like manner, δ is under- 
stood after 30.—‘) ΝΘ is to be taken 
impersonally : ad there should be heal- 
ing to them. he healing referred to is 
the entire moral recovery which sin- 
ners experience on their conversion to 
God; and, as pardon is essential to 
such recovery, healing and forgiveness 
of sins came to be regarded by the 
Hebrews as synonymous. Hence, after 
the Targum, 727%, the words are thus 
paraphrased, Mark iv. 12, καὶ ἀφεθῇ 
αὐτοὶς τὰ ἁμαρτήματα, though in the 
parallel passages, ἐάσομαι of the LXX. 
is retained. 

11. Os WrRow, This accumulation 
is designed to give intensity to the 
statement, and thereby to intimate, in 
such connexion, the great length of 
time during which the obstinacy of 
the Jews should be evinced. Comp. 
Gen. xxviii. 15; Numb. xxxii. 17.— 
προ ANN, lit. be laid waste, a desola- 
tion, for “be utterly wasted.” 

12. The Babylonish captivity is 
evidently predicted in this verse.— 
mad, that which is forsaken ; 1. 6. the 
portion of the land, with whatever 
pertained to it, which the inhabitants 
were compelled to leave on their trans- 
portation. That the LXX. and Vulg. 
which have been followed by Lowth, 
have quite mistaken the meaning of 
the term, will be seen on comparing 


chap. xvii. 2; Jer. iv. 29; Zeph. ii. 43 
where it is employed precisely as it is 
in this place. 

13. HM) 7IW— 39, in such connexion, 
is used adverbially, to indicate a repe- 
tition of the action expressed by the 
following verb. Thus the LXX. καὶ 
πάλιν ἔσται εἰς προνομὴν : and Symm. 
καὶ πάλιν ἔσται εἰς καταβοσκήσιν.--- ΠῚ 
wid, lit. fo be for burning, shall be 
burnt, or laid waste by burning. See, 
for the phrase, Numb, xxiv. 22; Is. 
xliv. 15.—n2>0, a felling or throwing 
down, from 28, to cast, cast down, over- 
throw. 232 and ΠΣ, from 323, Zo set, 
place, plant, remain stationary in a place : 
hence the signification of stock or 
trunk attaching to the noun, from its 
continuing in the ground. The fem. 
pron. affix in ΠΩΣ, refers to ™Yty, 
the tenth part; and 03 (for which 
upwards of a hundred MSS. read, or 
have read, 72,) belongs to iis) 7x. 
The meaning of the whole verse seems 
to be this: So severe shall be the 
punishment inflicted upon the nation, 
that should only a small part recover 
itself, that part shall likewise in its 
turn be punished. Nevertheless, it 
shall not be entirely annihilated ; but 
like the trunk of the most durable of 
trees, which sends forth a fresh shoot, 
it shall produce a holy race to adorn 
the church of God. For the terebinth 
and the oak, see on chap. i. 29. On 
account of their obstinacy, the Jews 
were first carried away to Babylon ; 
after the short respite which followed 
the restoration, during which they 
might be said never to have regained 
more than a tenth part of their former 
strength and influence, they were 
finally and completely overthrown by 
the Romans; but, though nearly eight- 
een centuries have elapsed since that 


CHAP. VII.] 


ISATAH. 


δῦ 


Yet, like the terebinth and the oak, 
Of which, when felled, there is a stock, 
The stock thereof shall be a holy seed. 


event, they still radically exist, and we 
anticipate the period, when, as a peo- 
ple, their motto shall be, “ Holiness 
unto the Lord.” The best commen- 
tary upon the latter half of this 
verse is furnished by Paul, Rom. xi., in 
which he treats of the fall and present 
rejection of the Jews, and their future 


restoration. The metaphor of the 
root and its branches somewhat differs 
from that here employed; but the 
subject is the same, and is introduced 
in a similar way, by a recognition of 
the blindness and obstinacy of the 
Jewish people, verses 7—10. 


oe 


CHAPTER VII. 


The grand section of the Prophet’s writings which commences with this 
chapter, extends to the fourth verse of Chapter X. The leading subjects are 
the invasion of Judah by the Syro-Israelitish army, and by that of Senna- 
cherib ; but repeated occasion is taken, from the disastrous aspect of the 
times, to announce the certainty of the Messiah’s advent, and the happiness 
to be enjoyed under his reign. Several difficulties occur in this portion of 
the book: but some of them have been unnecessarily magnified, in con- 
sequence of the prejudices under the influence of which many have laboured 
who have attempted its interpretation. The historical circumstances are 
specially narrated, 2 Kings xvi. 5—18, and 2 Chron. xxviii. 

The seventh chapter begins with a brief statement of the circumstances which 
led to the delivery of the prophecies which it contains, 1, 2; it then gives 
an account of the message with which Isaiah was sent to Ahaz, whose mind 
and that of his courtiers had been struck with a panic by the threatened 
invasion, 3—9; we have next, his second message to the unbelieving 
monarch, requiring him to ask for a miracle from Jehovah, in attestation of 
his prophetic commission, 10—12; the celebrated announcement of the 
miraculous conception of the Messiah, with a view to support the faith of 
the pious, whose fears respecting the total extinction of the house of David 
had been excited, 13—16 ; and a prediction of the calamities to which the 
Jewish people should be subjected by the very power to which Ahaz looked 
for succour, 17—25. 


1 AND it came to pass in the days of Ahaz, the son of Jotham, 


1. An attempt was made on the part of that of Ahaz, B. c. 743.—"y. This 


of the kings of Syria and Samaria to 
invade Judah towards the close of the 
reign of Jotham, 2 Kings xv. 37, but 
it was only a prelude to the actual in- 
vasion of the land by the joint forces 
of these kings at the commencement 


verb, like the corresponding verbs in 
most languages, is used of an approach 
towards a metropolis or chief city, 
altogether irrespective of the elevation 
of its position, or of its direction, in a 
geographical point of view. None of 


ISATAH. - 


[CHAP. VII. 


the son of Uzziah, king of Judah, that Rezin the king of 
Syria, with Pekah the son of Remaliah, king of Israel, came 
up to Jerusalem to fight against it, but he was not able to take 


ΠΡ 


And it was told to the house of David, saying, Syria 


leadeth forward with Ephraim ; and his heart and the heart of 
his people shook, as the trees of the forest shake before the 
3 wind. And Jehovah said to Isaiah: Go out now to meet 


the instances adduced by Rosenmiiller, 
Bib, Geog. vol. i. p. 8, in support of the 
all refer to local elevation, or the 
latter idea, can be sustained, since they 
contrary. The military acceptation, 
which, after Vitringa, the same author 
assigns to the term in his Scholia on 
this verse, is equally untenable. In 
application to Jerusalem,as the central 
point of the Theocracy, it is peculiarly 
appropriate—Ow. Aramea—not Syria 
in the largest extent of its signifi- 
cation, comprehending the vast tract 
of country between Phenicia, Pales- 
tine, Arabia, the Tigris, and Mount 
Taurus ; but one of the minor 
divisions, called pret ON, Syria of 
Damascus, 2 Sam. viii. 6, comp. Amos 
i. 5, from Damascus being the capital. 
Its limits varied according to the 
power of the princes who reigned over 
it. It was subdued by David, 1 Chron. 
xviii. 6, but afterwards regained its 
freedom, and proved a source of re- 
peated annoyance to the neighbouring 
kingdom of Israel. Though Rezin, its 
king, failed in his attempt upon Jeru- 
‘salem, he succeeded in taking Elath, 
the important sea-port on the eastern 
arm of the Arabian gulf, which it does 
not appear the Jews ever recovered. 
mama), lit. to the war, the substantive 
instead of the Infinitive 0797, as in 
Deut. x. 12; Jud. xvi. 23. In refer- 
ence to a city, 00% followed by °Y or 3 
signifies to besiege; but here it ex- 
presses the superadded,idea of, Jde- 
sieging so as to take-—°%X, for which we 
have 555 in the plural, 2 Kings xvi. 5, 
may either be taken distributively, or 
which is preferable, it may refer to 
Rezin, the head of the hostile expe- 
dition, and so agree with 72 in the 
singular. In the last clause of the 
verse, the event is inserted by pro- 
lepsis, 

2. ima, “the house of David,” sig- 


nifies the royal family of which Ahaz 
was the representative, which suf- 
ficiently accounts for the ‘in 4329 and 
sor.—oIw mm). Here Aramea is used for 
the Arameans, or the Syrian army 
which was advancing towards Jerusa- 
lem. 72 is not the third person 
feminine of ™, ¢o vest, but a different 
verb, signifying, fo lead forth, or forward, 


conduct troops, &c.; Arab. lL, tetendit, 


contendit aliquem versus; Eth. 42% = 
in longum se produxit ; in the fourth 


Conjug. AVE: produzit, prolongavit, 


extendit. The word is also used in a 
military sense, Ps. lx. 11, D118 272 Ὁ, 
“Who will /ead me to Edom?” It 
thus agrees in gender with 03x, the 
masculine antecedent; and the ne- 
cessity of forcing upon ™) the idea of 
encamping is superseded—an accep- 
tation in which it never occurs. The 
accentuation of the Masorites is of no 
weight in such a case.—¥ has fre- 
quently the signification of with, in 
reference to what follows another ; as 
Exod. xxxv. 22, Drd3xroy OWT WIN ; 
Amos iii. 15, PRIS ὃν FAT m3; and 
with this very verb, Job xxxviii. 32, 
DMN ΠΝ y wv, or canst thou lead out 
Aish with her sons ? lit. or Aish with her 
sons, canst thou lead them out ? but the 
Ὁ is pleonastic. Agreeably also to 
this interpretation, D8 corresponds 
to Ds ; both being used ina personal, 
not in ἃ territorial sense. . See 
Michaelis’s Supp. ad Lexx. Heb. p. 
1625. The news of the combined 
armies approaching might well alarm 
the Jewish monarch. 

3. As no reason is assigned why 
Isaiah was to take his son with 
him, some interpreters have sup- 
posed, that it was in order that 
he might point to him when giving 


CHAP. VII.| 


ISATAH. 


57 


Ahaz, thou, and Shear-jashub thy son, at the end of the aque- 
duct of the upper pool, at the highway of the fuller’s field ; 
4 and say to him: Take heed, and be quiet; fear not, neither let 


the assurance, verses 15 and 16; 
but that this position cannot be 
philologically sustained, will be shewn 
in the proper place—The name 180 
awe, SHEAR-JASHUB, a Remnant shall 
return, is symbolical. It occurs again 
chap x. 21, 1132 OY ἌΡ) INW Iw We, 
A remnant shall return, a remnant γ' 
Jacob to the Mighty God; not, indeed, 
as a proper name, but as giving the 
import of the name, and shewing 
that the return spoken of was not a 
mere return from external captivity, 
but true conversion to God. Such 
was the significancy of the name 
which Isaiah had prophetically given 
to his son; and as this could not but 
be known to Ahaz and the court, his 
accompanying his parent on this 
special occasion was highly calculated 
to excite attention, and inspire the 
confidence, that how much soever the 
Jews might be chastised by foreign 
enemies, in punishment of their sins, 
a portion of them should still turn to 
God and enjoy his favour.—The exact 
spot where the prophet was to meet 
Ahaz has been and still is much dis- 
puted, owing to the difficulty which 
is found in determining to which of 
the collections of water about Jeru- 


salem the 7373, Arab. as > 15 piscina, here 


specified, is to be referred. Rosen- 
miller and Olshausen concur in the 
opinion that Gihon and Si/oah, in con- 
nexion with which almost all the 
commentators place the locality, were 
on the South-East side of the city ; 
but they are placed on the South-West, 
close to Mount Gihon, and at no great 
distance from the gate at which 
the road from Joppa terminates, by 
Jerome, Reland, Wells, Vitringa, Bas- 
chienne, Ritter, Hamelsfeld, Schroeder 
(MS.), Hendewerk, Tholuck, Gesenius, 
Hengstenberg, and Weiland in his 
Bibel-Atlas. Lightfoot and Hitzig 
stand almost alone in supposing that 
the place spoken of lay on the North- 
East of Jerusalem. A careful col- 
lation of 2 Kings xviii. 17; 2 Chron. 
Xxxii. 4, 30 ; Neh. ii. 13—15; iii. 13— 


16 ; decidedly favours the second 
opinion, and especially 2 Chron. xxxii. 
30, where the meaning is not that 
Hezekiah brought the waters of Gihon 
westward, but that he prevented their 
flowing directly south from the foun- 
tain, by conducting them eastward, 
across the narrow intervening valley, 
to the west side of the city of David. 
The whole locality seems accurately 
laid down by Wells in his plan fronting 
p. 238, vol. ii, Edit. Oxford, 1809. 
Stloah, or Siloam, was the upper of two 
pools or reservoirs, MP7 72327; it 
received its water from the adjacent 
fountain ἡ, Gihon, (so called from 
the sudden or violent bursting forth 
of the water,) and again sent it 
forth by the vn, aqueduct, which 
stretched across to Mount Zion. 
Between this and the field used for 
fulling or bleaching clothes, was the 
mon, a raised road, running ina south- 
erly direction, towards the /ower pool. 
It appears to have been at the point 
of convergence between these two 
raised works, close to the gate below 
the royal palace, that the meeting 
took place. The monarch had in all 
probability repaired thither for the 
purpose of taking measures to prevent 
the water falling into the power of the 
invaders, whose first attack on the 
city would likely be made in that 
quarter. Such a step was actually 
taken by Hezekiah on the invasion of 
Sennacherib, 2 Chron. xxxii. 4, 30. 
The present well of Siloam, on the 
S. E. of Mount Moriah, may have 
received its name from its water 
having been conveyed thither by a 
subterranean aqueduct from the pool 
of the same name above described. 

4, opwm yr, properly, take heed to 
thyself so as to be quiet, or remain tran- 
quil ; suffer not thyself to be hurried 
away by unbelieving fear, to adopt any 
measures of safety that would imply 
want of confidence in God. ‘The 
former of these verbs is often used in 
the Imper. of Niphal for the purpose 
of strengthening the idea conveyed by 
that which follows it.—m32, ¢ai/s, pur- 


58 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP, VII. 


thy heart be faint, on account of these two tails of smoking 
fire-brands, the burning anger of Rezin, and Syria, and the son 
5 of Remaliah. Because Syria hath purposed evil against thee, 
Ephraim, and the son of Remaliah, saying: 
6 Let us go up against Judah, and entirely subvert it; 
And let us break it completely up for ourselves, 
And establish a king in it—the son of Tabeal: 


7 Thus saith the Lord Jehovah: 


It shall not stand; neither shall it be. 
8 For the head of Syria shall be Damascus ; 


posely chosen, instead of nizp, ends, to 
express centempt ; Rezin and Pekah 
resembled two pieces of wood, which 
the fire had consumed all but the 
extreme points, #nd even these had 
been so reduced by the burning 
element, that they could no longer 
feed it, but only feebly emitted smoke. 
What then had Ahaz to fear? They 
had kindled the war, (comp. the Arab. 


Lo] "ἢ but the eye οἵ Omni- 


science beheld them reduced to the 
very last extremity by the Assyrian 
power.—Ow), dud Syria, at which 
some translators and critics have 
stumbled, is very appropriately added 
to the name of the king, for the sake 
of emphasis ; just as both m2, Pekah, 
and Dmx, Ephraim, are omitted in 
what follows, to express the idea of 
the weakness of the Israelites apart 
from their foreign ally, and the con- 
tempt in which their regicide king 
deserved to be held. In like manner, 
and for the same reason, the name of 
the projected king of Jerusalem is 
suppressed, ver. 6, and he is merely 
called the son of Tabeal :—a mode of 
speech not without example among 
the Arabs. Comp. also 1 Sam. xx. 
27, 30, 31; xxii. 9, 12; for other 
examples of a similar Hebrew usage. 

5. 3 155 connect with Vox 7) at the 
beginning of ver. 7,and not with the 
preceding verse. Here the name of 
the Syrian king is omitted, and that 
of Ephraim is inserted ; probably with 
a view to give prominence to the con- 
federate armies. The son of Rema- 
liah is again mentioned, to expose 
him to further contempt. 

6. The Suff. in ΤΡῚΣ refers to TH, 


the Subst. immediately preceding, and 
not, as Gesenius and Rosenmiiller 
would have it, to O23 understood. 
The Nun epenthetic is inserted in this 
and the following verb, to express the 
completeness ofthe anticipated actions, 


yr, Root pp, Arab. sk, diruit, dis- 


solvit tentorium. This derivation, pro- 
posed by Michaelis, and approved by 
Schroeder, (j7?, pp. rwmpere, rumpendo 
dissolvere—translata est ad notanda 
regni et Reipub. destructionem, MS. 
in loc.) is preferable to that adopted 
by Gesenius: viz. fo put in fear, 
which he violently explains of esieg- 
ing! It has the support of the 


Syriac masa, let us root it up, sub- 


vert it; and agrees better with the 
parallel 7:y723, which expresses the 
idea of cleaving, breaking through, up, 
&c. The objects at which the con- 
federates aimed, were the entire de- 
struction of the house of David, and 
the placing of a foreigner upon the 
throne.—82%, ‘apart from the pause, 
2x20, Tabeal, is a Syriac name, and cor- 
responds to the Heb. ™21%, Tobiah. 
In all probability, the person whom it 
designates belonged to Syria. The 
contemptuous suppression of the son’s 
name is, of course, to be ascribed to 
the prophet, and not to the hostile 
kings. 

7. The declaration of Jehovah in 
this verse is sublimely peremptory— 
quite in the style of HR MM, 
Gen. i. 3. Comp. Ps. xxxiii, 9—11 ; 
Is. vii. 10; xiv. 24. 

8, 9, contain an assurance, that the 
two threatening powers should be con- 
fined within their own limits. Their 


CHAP. Υ11.} 


. ISATAH. 


59 


And the head of Damascus, Rezin ; 


And within sixty-five years, 


Ephraim shall be broken, so as to be no more a people. 
9 'The head also of Ephraim shall be Samaria; 


residences should be, before subdued 
by Assyria, what they had been, the re- 
spective capitals of Syria and Ephraim 
only ; they should exert no influence 
over Judah. In addition to which, the 
prophet delivers a specific prediction 
respecting the destruction of Ephraim, 
and a warning against disbelief of the 
Divine declaration. 33 at the begin- 
ning of ver. 8, is equivalent to ON7?, 
but, but on the contrary. Comp. Ps. i. 
2, and freq.—nm Am won) ow Tiyn 
Dyp oOneN, And within sixty-five years 
Ephraim shall be broken, so as not to be 
a people. This has generally been con- 
sidered a locus veratissimus, both on 
account of the position of the words, 
and the chronological difficulty con- 
nected with the specified number of 
years. As the two verses consist of 
three distichs, the first and last of 
which form a perfect parallel, the two 
middle lines have been regarded as 
disturbing the order, and are by some 
restored to what is thought to have 
been their original position at the 
conclusion ; while by others they are 
entirely rejected as a gloss. Those 
who consider their occupying the 
place they now fill, to be the effect 
of inadvertent transposition on the 
part of some copyist, base their 
judgment on a principle of taste ; 
those who consider them to be spu- 
rious, are influenced partly by this 
principle, and partly by the pressure 
of a supposed difficulty in their inter- 
pretation. Others, who are disposed 
to receive the distich either as it 
now stands, or as it may be trans- 
posed, are still dissatisfied with the 
number of the years, and propose, 
some one alteration, and some another. 
To these various theories, however, 
stands opposed the unanimous testi- 
mony of all the MSS. versions, and 
other sources of evidence which prove 
the integrity of the text. As to the 
alleged perfection of parallelism, nu- 
merous instances occur, in which it is 
broken in upon by the insertion of 


some sentence or sentences, which 
had so taken possession of the writer, 
that he would sacrifice taste rather 
than suppress them, or postpone their 
introduction. The present case is 
precisely one of these. Isaiah had 
the utter extinction of the ten tribes, 
as a people inhabiting the Holy Land, 
so powerfully impressed upon his 
mind, that before proceeding to an- 
nounce, that, in the mean time, they 
too should not make further encroach- 
ments upon the Jewish territory, he 
predicts their ultimate doom. The 
words are, therefore, quite in their 
place. 

With respect to the computation of 
the prophetic period here specified, 
the only one which is at all satis- 
factory is that of the more recent 
Jewish chronologers, approved in the 
main by Archbishop Usher, Sir Isaac 
Newton, Vignolles, Jubb, Lowth, 
Doderlein, Hengstenberg, Hoffman, 
Drechsler, and others, according to 
which, it extends from the second 
year of Ahaz, when the prediction 
was delivered, to the twenty-second 
year of the reign of Manasseh, which 
was exactly sixty-five years. In the 
last-mentioned year Esarhaddon com- 
pleted the depopulation of Ephraim, 
by making room for the colonists 
whom he transplanted thither from 
various regions of the East ; or, at all 
events, so intermingled the new in- 
habitants with them, that they had 
no longer any distinct existence in 
the land. See Ezra iv. 2; and comp. 
2 Chron. xxxiii. 11 ; and 2 Kings xvii. 
23, 24. They had ceased to exist poli- 
tically when Shalmaneser took Sa- 
maria, and carried away the flower of 
the nation ; but they now, in the full- 
est sense of the phrase, were cut off 
Dyn, ὃ. 6. DY MM, from being a people νι 
the country granted to their fathers. 
Another people henceforward occupied 
it: this took place B. ο. 722. The ob- 
jections of Gesenius, Hitzig, and 
others, are fully met by Hengstenberg 


00 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. VII. 


And the head of Samaria, Remaliah’s son. 
If ye believe not, surely ye shall not remain. 


10 
11 


And Jehovah spake again to Ahaz, saying: 
Ask for thyself a sign from Jehovah thy God, 


Ask it below, or in the height above. 


12 


in his Christologie, so that further 
notice of them is unnecessary. 

The prophet, observing indications 
of impatience and unbelief in the 
conduct of Ahaz and his attendants, 
adds the important warning, 8? ON 
waNn No -pavorn, If ye will not believe, 
surely ye shall not be continued, i. 6. in 
the regal station. The Jewish state 
shall be subverted, as was that of 
Israel, if its members persevere in un- 
belief. The use of the different con- 
jugations of the same verb forms a 
beautiful instance of antanaclasis com- 
bined with paronomasia ; the latter of 
which has been successfully imitated 
by Theod. ἐὰν μὴ πιστεύσητε, οὐδ᾽ ov 
μὴ πιστευθείητε; and in part by 
Luther, Glaubet thr nicht, so bleibet 
ihr nicht. The same variation in a 
positive proposition occurs 2 Chron. 
xx. 20. 

10, 11. These and the following 
verses to the end of the chapter, 
contain a separate and distinct pro- 
phecy, arising, indeed, out of the cir- 
cumstances connected with the Syrian 
invasion, but relating to a different 
subject, viz. the punishment to be in- 
flicted upon the Jewish state by the 
Assyrians. The important prophecy 
respecting the Messiah, ver. 14, &c. is 
introduced as a sure basis upon which 
the hopes of the pious might still 
rest. It does not appear to have been 
delivered at the same juncture of time 
with the preceding prophecy. The 
words, 122 7 FON, rather shew that 
an interval had elapsed, and that 
another or additional prophetic an- 
nouncement is here made.—nix, LXX. 


σημεῖον, Syr. 2] ᾿ Arab. δ] , from mx 


in Hithp. to mark, mark out, determine, 
Numb. xxxiv. 10: hence the noun 
came to signify that which serves as 
a token or proof of anything, (argumen- 
tum, ratio rerum,) and especially a 


But Ahaz said: I will not ask, 


miracle, a3 the most convincing proof 
of the truth and certainty of the 
Divine declarations. It is also used, 
as will be shewn ver. 14, to denote 
some future miraculous event, the 
prediction of which is designed to 
produce a present effect on the minds 
of those to whom it is delivered.— 
Instead of xd, Aq., Symm., and 
Theod. appear to have read πον ; ren- 
dering βάθυνον eis ἅδην, “ Go deep into 
Hades.” In this they have been fol- 
lowed by Jerome, Michaelis, Lowth, 
and some other moderns ; but the idea 
of evoking the dead, or obtaining a mi- 
racle from the abodes of the departed, 
is so repugnant to the whole tenour of 
Scripture, that we are compelled at 
once to reject this interpretation. 
In fact, nothing more seems to be 
meant than what might take place 
miraculously upon earth, as contrasted 
with a miraculous sign in the heavens ; 
just as our Lord contrasts τὰ ἐπίγεια 
with ra ἐπουράνια, John iii. 12; or as 
the Jews demanded a σημεῖον ἐκ τοῦ 
ovpavod, in contradistinction from the 
miracles which he was performing on 
the earth, Matt. xvi.1. Thus Origen, 
in Matt. understands the words, eis 
βάθος, ἢ eis ὕψος ; and explains, καὶ ἀπὸ 
γῆς καὶ ἀπὸ οὐρανοῦ. Thus also Calvin, 
“vel sursum, vel deorsum: permittet 
ei liberam electionem miraculi, ut vel 
terrestre, vel celeste postulet.” 2» sig- 
nifies not only ἕο be deep, in reference 
to what is in the earth, water, &c., but 
also to be low or inferior, in reference 
to any thing higher in position. 
Hence P22, a valley, or low ground, con- 
trasted with mountains, hills, ἕο. As 
to the form of the word, 780 is the 
Imperative with a paragogic 7, and is 
understood after 7227. 

12, 13. Ahaz hypocritically pretends 
that there is no necessity for any 
Divine interference, and professes to 
regard as sin what God had graciously 


.- 


CHAP. VII.] 


ISATAH. 


61 


13 Neither will I put Jehovah to the proof. Then Isaiah said: 


Hear now, O house of David : 


Ts it too small a matter for you to weary out men ? 
Ye must also forsooth weary out my God! 
14 Nevertheless, the Lord himself will give you a sign: 


accorded to him; for which he is 
sharply reproved by the prophet.— 
Dan ὌΨΙ, lit. cs it little from, or in com- 
parison of you? i.e. do ye account it 
an act not sufficiently indicative of 
your depravity ? Though this reproof 
also affected the princes of the house 
of David, in virtue of their relation 
to the incredulous monarch, yet, as 
God had made a covenant of royalty 
with the head of that house, that it 
should not be cut off, notwithstanding 
the wickedness of individual kings, 
but should continue till the appear- 
ance of the Rod from the stem of 
Jesse, he now, by his messenger, gives 
them, and such of the Jews as were 
expecting the fulfilment of the ancient 
prophecies, an explicit assurance, that, 
whatever judgments might be brought 
upon the nation forits wickedness, (and 
such he was just about to denounce,) 
they should not interfere with the ac- 
complishment of the promise, 1 Chron, 
xvii. 11. This assurance is contained 
in the following verse, in which the 
certainty of the birth of the promised 
Seed is set forth as the ground of 
continued confidence in God. 

14, This verse has long been a 
subject of dispute both between Jews 
and professedly Christian writers, and 
among the latter mutually. While 
the former reject its application to 
the Messiah altogether,—the earlier 
rabbins explaining it of the queen of 
Ahaz, and the birth of his son Heze- 
kiah ; and the later, as Kimchi and 


7 Abarbanel, of the prophet’s own wife, 


—the great body of Christian inter- 
preters have held it to be directly 
and exclusively a prophecy of our 
Saviour, and have considered them- 
selves fully borne out by the inspired 
authority of the Evangelist Matthew, 
chap. i. 22, 23. Others, however, 
have dissented from this construction 
of the passage, and have invented, or 
adopted various hypotheses in support 
of such dissent. Grotius, Faber, 


Isenbiehl, Hezel, Bolten, Fritsche, 
Pluschke, Gesenius,and Hitzig, suppose 
either the then present, or a future 
wife of Isaiah to be meant by the 
mov referred to. Eichhorn, Paulus, 
Hensler, and Ammon, are of opinion, 
that the prophet had nothing more in 
view than an ideal virgin, and that 
both she and her son were merely 


om aseauts 


king and his courtiers. 
class, among whom are Richard Simon, 
Le Clerc, Lowth, Koppe, Dathe, Wil- 
liams, Von Meyer, Olshausen, and Dr. 
J. Pye Smith, adopt the hypothesis of 
a double sense: one, in which the 
words applyprimarily either to some 
female living in the time of the pro- 
phet, and her giving birth to a son 
according to the ordinary laws of 
nature; or, aS Dathe holds, to some 
virgin who at that time should mira- 
culously conceive; and the gther, in 
which they received a secondary and 
plenary fulfilment in the miraculous 
conception and birth of Christ. 
Kleinert assumes that the whole pas- 
sage relates to a vision which was 
vouchsafed to the prophet. To at- 
tempt a refutation of each of these 
theories would require more space 
than can here be spared. And, indeed, 
it is rendered in a great measure 
superfluous, by the self-contradictory 
and mutually subversive bearings by 
which they are distinguished ; while 
some of them are so manifestly 
formed to serve the hypotheses, as to 
be totally unworthy of notice. I shall, 
therefore, confine myself to the simple 
philology and exegesis of the passage. 


722, like the Arab. ws possesses 


here a strongly exceptive force, and 
expresses the introduction of a pro- 
position the reverse of what might 


i 


62 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. VII. 


Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son ; 


have been expected. It is best ren- 
dered into English by xotwithstanding, 
nevertheless, or the like. x7 28, THE 
LORD HIMSELF, is emphatic. The sign 
was to be given immediately or mira- 
culously, and not through human in- 
tervention. The verb 112 being put in 
the strictly future tense, shews that 
the sign, or miracle, was not one 
given or wrought at the time, but 
belonging to some future period. To 
the application of the miracle to the 
birth of Christ, it has been objected, 
that a future event, and especially one 
so very remote, could not possibly 
have affected the minds of those to 
whom the prophet addressed himself, 
and cannot, indeed, be said, with any 
propriety, to be a sign at all. To this 
it is only necessary to reply, that no 
intimation whatever is given either of 
remoteness or proximity in point of 
time. So far as the language is con- 
cerned, the prophecy might have 
received its fulfilment within a few 
years, or even months, as well as at 
the distant period of seven centuries. 
Nothing can, therefore, be more unfair, 
than to allege as a difficulty what has 
no real existence. The uncertainty in 
regard to time was calculated to exert 
a salutary influence upon the minds 
of believers, by keeping up in them 
a constant expectation of the event, 
just as the uncertainty of the time 
of our Lord’s second advent has 
always been found to operate favour- 
ably upon the minds of his people. 
As to that part of the objection 
which denies the relevancy of the 
term Mix, sigv, in application to some 
future event, the simple preannounce- 
ment of which was designed to induce 
to present action, it is satisfactorily 
met by the fact that the word is 
clearly thus applied Exod. iii. 12, and 
Jer. xliv. 29, 30. In both these 
instances it is employed precisely as 
in the present text, in reference to 
what was afterwards to take place. 
Comp. also 1 Sam. ii. 34. The accom- 
pe it is granted, was earlier ; 

ut this does not in the least affect 
the question, and ought not to be 
urged as an objection. Till the events 
took place, they were as entirely 


foreign to the experience of those to 
whom they were predicted, as the 
birth of our Saviour was to O. T. 
believers.—27 is frequently used by 
the prophets to excite attention to 
the subject which they are about to 
announce. When followed by a Ben. 
participle, as it is in the present 
instance by ΠῚ, it indicates the futu- 
rity of the action specified—The 
article in YT is so far definite, that gy 
it marks out a particular person whom 
the prophet had in his mental view ; 
but it cannot, without violence, be 
invested with any thing like a demon- 
strative power, so as to intimate, that, 
in using it, he pointed to a young 
female then present, as some have 
contended. That it should stand for 
the pronominal affix ?, as 22%, which 
Gesenius thinks probable, is perfectly 
inadmissible: such a form, according 
to Hebrew usage, and, indeed, accord- 
ing to the wsus loguendi in all lan- 
guages, would signify my daughter, or 
my female servant, not my wife, or my 
intended wife, which that author takes 
to be the meaning. Comp. ἡ παρθένος 
αὐτοῦ, 1 Cor. vii. 36. Precisely the 
same degree of definiteness attaches 
to mv, She who is to bear, employed 
by Micah, (chap. v. 2,) who was con- 
temporary with Isaiah; on which 
Hitzig remarks, “Though Micah gives 
expression to obscure and mysterious 
matters, yet by ‘She that is to bear’ 
he can only mean the mother of 
Messiah, to whom the suffix in YTS 
refers.” Comment. iz Joc. 

Respecting the etymology and sig- 
nification of πρῦν, considerable differ- 
ence of opinion obtains. Gesenius 
and others have recourse to the Arab. 


$, coéundi cupidus, libidinosus, eoque 
velut furibundus fuit; whence are derived 
wie, ee , adolescens, and kel, pics 
adolescentula; and they endeavour to 
derive support to their opinion from 


the mas. 099 being used to signify ὦ 
young man, 1 Sam. xvii. 56, xx. 22 ; and 


2 =x Vv 
from the cognates x32, JASquSS, 


which, in the Aramaic dialects, signify 
a young woman. It looks suspicious, 


CHAP. VII.] 


ISATAH. 


63 


And shall call his name IMMANUEL. 


however, to have recourse to other 
dialects in order to determine the 
primary signification of a word, while 
no reference whatever is made to an 
indigenous root in common use. 
Now it is beyond dispute, that τὸν 
occurs frequently in the acceptation 
to hide, be concealed, unrevealed, un- 
known; and it was natural, from this 
common acceptation of the verb, to 
apply the nouns D7, and ποῦν, to 
persons of youthful age, who were as 
yet unknown to the world, and espe- 
cially who were destitute of the know- 
ledge which springs from sexual inter- 
course. Thus Aq. renders 72%, Gen. 
xxiv. 43, by ἀπόκρυφος, the LXX., as 
in our present text, by παρθένος. In 
the former of the two passages above 
quoted from 1 Sam. it is undeniable 
that extreme youth is the idea attaching 
to the mas. noun; and on comparing 
Gen. xxiv. 43; Exod. ii. 8; Ps. Ixviii. 
26; Prov. xxx. 19; Song i. 3, vi. 8; 
the only other instances in which the 
fem. noun occurs, that of a young 
unmarried female, and, by implication, 
virgo intacta, is the most natural and 
unforced. So evidently, indeed, does 
this signification attach to ninwy, Song 
vi. 8, where those to whom the term 
is applied are distinguished both from 
the 002, concubines, with whom the 
king is supposed to have cohabited, 
and the mi229, his royal cousorts, that it 
is surprising how any other meaning 
could ever have been palmed upon it. 
In his animadversions prefixed to the 
second vol. of Rosenmuller’s Scholia 
in Comp. redacta, the learned Rabbi 
5. Ὁ. Luzzatto, is obliged to acknow- 
ledge respecting the two former words: 
“Je ne sais pas quels caractéres distin- 
guaient une ΠΡ» d’une 8298: cependant 
ce texte de la Cantique suppose swus 
doute que ce fussent deux conditions 
différentes.” In like manner, 179%, 
Prov. xxx. 19, manifestly signifies one 
who is a virgin, either actually or by 
reputation, up to the time of her 
ceasing to be so by the successful 
attempt made to corrupt her ; and so 
far is the term from being synony- 
mous with npx72 Tx, in the following 
verse, as the Jews would have it, that 
the latter is merely added for the sake 


of furnishing a parallel instance of 
concealment on the part of a married 
female, corresponding to that em- 
ployed in the former instance by the 
man, to prevent his exposure to the 
punishment annexed in the law of 
Moses to the seduction of a virgin. 
Exod. xxii. 16; Deut. xxii. 23, 24. 

With respect to the text before us, 
it must be considered strongly corro- 
borative of the view commonly taken 
of the signification of the word, that 
it was rendered παρθένος by the Greek 
translator at a time when no polemical 
grounds existed to bias his mind ; and 
that it was not till after the time of 
our Lord, when Jews and Christians 
had engaged in controversy respecting 
the meaning of the O. T. prophecies, 
that this term was changed by Aquila 
and Symmachus, into νεᾶνις, a damsel. 
Add to whichthe testimony of Jerome, 
that in the Punic, which was a dialect 
of equal antiquity with the Hebrew, 
alma signified a virgin: a testimony 
which is entitled to all credit, not 
being in the slightest degree affected 
by the attempt of Gesenius to invali- 
date its authority. To the objection, 
that, if the prophet had intended to 
convey the idea of proper virginity, 
he would have employed the word 
mana, it is only necessary to reply, 
that although this term appears in 
some instances to have been employed 
as a more definite synonyme, yet 
there are others in which its use is 
perfectly identical with that of 7», 
such, as Deut. xxxii. 25, ΠΡ ΓΞΓῺΞ WIT ; 
2 Chron, xxxvi. 17, ΠΡ Way. Comp. 
also Ps. cxlviii. 12 ; Jer. li. 22 ; in all 
which passages 77na is obviously dis- 
tinctive of age, and not expressly of 
virginity, though it may be implied. 
It is even used of a married female, 
Joel i. 8, which is more than can be 
affirmed of 72%y. In this instance the 
LXX. has νύμφη. 

The express design of the allegation 
of the prophecy by the inspired Evan- 
gelist, requires ποῦν to be taken in the 
sense of virgin ; for on the assumption 
that he merely accommodated the 
passage, he could not have drawn a 
lamer or more absurd conclusion, than 
to have affirmed, that as Isaiah had 


64 


15 Butter and honey shall he eat, 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. VII. 


When he shall know to reject what is evil, 


declared that a young married female 
should bear a son after the usual 
period of gestation, so the Saviour of 
the world had been miraculously born 
of a virgin! But that there is no 
accommodation, but a strict and 
proper application of the prophecy as 
receiving its real fulfilment in our 
Lord’s miraculous conception and 
birth, the peculiar force of the lan- 
guage sufficiently shows: TOYTO AE 
ὍΛΟΝ γέγονεν, k.T.X. 

Finally, the very circumstances of 
the context in Isaiah render it im- 
possible to put any other consistent 
construction upon the term, since it 
would be a flagrant violation of her- 
meneutical propriety to maintain that 
Mx, ὦ sign, 15. used ver. 14 in a sense 
different from that of miracle, to 
designate which it is employed ver. 
11. 

m7 is the fem. of the verb. adj. 7, 
preguant, though as occurring in con- 
nexion with n7} 727, it has the force 
of a participle, and a future signi- 
fication. It occurs in a similar con- 
nexion, Gen. xvi. 11; Judges xii. 5; 
only ΠῚ is there pointed m7, as if 
contracted for AX n>, Comp. on Awa, 
Ezek. viii. 16.—nxy. Three of De 
Rossi’s MSS., and another originally, 
two or three of the earliest editions, 
the LXX., Aquila, Symmachus, and 
Theod., read ΠΝ in the second 
person; but the n is merely a sub- 
stitute for 1, as in Deut. xxxi. 29; 
Jer. xliv. 23. Comp. also Lev. xxv. 
21; Ps. cxviii. 23. As it was cus- 
tomary, sometimes for the father, and 
sometimes for the mother, to give the 
name to the child, it is not unworthy 
of notice, that in the present case it 
is ascribed to the virgin ; and that the 
angel Gabriel charged Mary to name 
the child whom she was to bear. 
Καλέσουσι, Matt. i. 23, stands for the 
passive κληθήσεται, aS in numerous 
other instances.—In forty-three MSS., 
and thirty-nine printed editions, 22 
is given in the separate form of 
3222 ; but in the orthography of all 
compound names, the MSS. and 
editions widely differ. This name, 


which signifies GOD WITH US, is a 
descriptive, or characteristic title, not 
a proper name. According toa Hebrew 
idiom, referred to chap. i. 26, it in- 
dicates, that the child to be born 
should be in reality what the name 
imports—OcavOparos, or, as Theodoret 
explains, τὸν ἐνανθρωπήσαντα θεὸν, τὸν 
τὴν ἀνθρωπείαν φύσιν ἀνειληφότα θεὸν ; 
not, certainly, to the exclusion of the 
idea of Divine protection and de- 
liverance, but connecting these im- 
mediately with the Person to whom 
the name was given. Rosenmiiller ap- 
positely remarks : “ Eum vero divine 
futurum esse nature θεάνθρωπον mani- 
festum est inde, quod in eodem hoc 
vaticinio infra 9. 5, puer ille nasciturus 
diserte dicitur appellandus inter alia 
esse 133 ὅδ, Deus fortis.” Comment. 
in loc. 

15, 16. By some, the former of 
these verses is referred to Immanuel, 
and the latter to Shear-jashub ; but 
the latter reference is founded ona 
supposed demonstrative force of the 
article in 29, which it does not possess. 
Definitely to mark a child pointed to, 
which, it has been said, the prophet 
here did, the phrase must have been 
ma qw23, “ This child,” as all who are 
familiar with the language must per- 
ceive. Wi, ver. 16, can, therefore, 
refer to no other than Immanuel, 
ver. 14, just as 2, chap. vill. 4, is 
Maher-shalal-Hash-baz, spoken of ver. 
3. Equally untenable is the con- 
struction which regards Shear-jashub 
as referred to by anticipation, ver. 15, 
and then more definitely pointed out 
ver. 16; and no interpretation com- 
mends itself as consistent, but that 
which applies both verses to Im- 
manuel, the immediate antecedent. 
This interpretation would doubtless 
have long since been universally 
adopted, had the connexion of these 
verses with that immediately follow- 
ing been perceived, or had a proper 
translation been given of the latter 
part of ver. 16.—The prophet, having 
announced the miraculous fact of the 
incarnation of the Messiah, next ad- 
yerts to the sustenance by which he 


CHAP. VII.] 


And to choose what is good. 


ISAIAH. 


65 


16 But before the youth shall have knowledge 
To reject what is evil and to choose what is good, 
The land, which thou destroyest, shall be forsaken by both its 


kings. 


should be nourished during the period 
of his .youth ; in order, partly to in- 
timate that, though his human nature 
should be miraculously produced, and 
sustain a most intimate union to the 
Divine, yet it should not be physically 
supported in a way different from that 
of other children ; but chiefly to draw 
attention to the period when he should 
reach the years of discretion, as that 
of the final cessation of the temporal 
power of the Jews. “Noris, properly, 
not butter, but thick or curdled milk ; 


Arab. (4, n. a. pe» Turum, spissum 
fuit lac. It is called in the modern 


Arabic uy leben, in Turkish 24), 


yugurt, and is still a favourite article 
of food in Syria, Arabia, and the 
neighbouring countries. Mixed with 
honey, it is exceedingly agreeable to 
the taste. The 2 in inyT?, is used in 
its temporal acceptation, “at, or about 
the time of his knowing,” or the like, 
as Gen. xxiv. 63. 1 ΓΒ), 2 Sam. 
XViii, 29, ΠΑΡ ΤΙΝῚ ANY PIT Tay NN Mw? 
The Messiah’s “ knowing to reject evil 
and to choose good” denotes more 
than a single development of the 
mental and moral faculties: it im- 
plies that he would decidedly abhor 
the one and approve the other; which 
cannot be predicted of children gene- 
rally, nor, indeed, of any one naturally 
but him ; and the words seem further 
to intimate, that he would give proofs 
of such moral discrimination by sanc- 
tioning what was right, and condemn- 
ing what was wrong. 


Αὐτὰρ ἐγὼ θυμῷ νοέω καὶ οἶδα ἕκαστα, 
Ἔσθλά τε, καὶ τὰ χέρα᾽ (πάρος δ᾽ ἔτι 

νήπιος ἤα.)---Οἰἶγδ5. xviii. 227. 

TI 9—7INT yA. These words have 
usually been referred to Syria and 
Ephraim, and are supposed to be in- 
tended for comfort to Ahaz; but the 
close connexion in which they stand 
with the following verse, presents a 


formidable objection to such exegesis ; 
not to insist on the incongruity of as- 
signing two kings to either of those 
countries. By 72787 is meant the land, 
by way of eminence—the land of Ca- 
naan, called iT ΓΟ, Jehovah's land, 
xiv. 2, and Immanuel’s land, Vili. 8. 
Though divided into two kingdoms 
after the revolt of the ten tribes, it 
still formed the possession which God 
claimed as his peculiar inheritance. 
This interpretation is confirmed by 
the distinct reference made to the re- 
volt, ver. 17. The two kings, there- 
fore, were not those of Israel and 
Syria ; but those of Israel and Judah. 
The punishment of the former had 
been predicted, ver. 8; that of the 
latter is explicitly denounced in this 
and the following verses.— 229 is to be 
construed with 12m, not with yz. The 
latter verb is followed, indeed, by this 
adverbial form, Exod. 1. 12 ; Numb. 
xxii. 3; but it is also used after the 
verb xv, Isaiah xvii. 9, and appears, 
in such connexion, to have no more 
force than 72, as in Lev. xxvi. 43, 
Dap IA YwM.—y7p has here the sense 
of cutting, breaking up, disturbing, &c. 
just as Hiph. is used, ver. 6. The 
prophet pointedly accuses Ahaz of 
breaking up or destroying the peace 
of the whole land—his sins being the 
cause of the Syrian invasion, which 
not only disturbed the tranquillity of 
Judah, but also that of Israel, through 
which the foreign army passed on its 
way. 0222 kings, stands here, as in 
Dan. vii. 17; Rev. xvii. 10, for hing- 
doms or dominions, in which a sove- 
reign and independent authority was 
exercised. As it respected Judah, 
the prophecy received its accomplish- 
ment when Archelaus was banished, 
and Judea reduced to a Roman pro- 
vince. This took place in the twelfth 
year of our Lord—the very year in 
which he evinced his wonderful dis- 
crimination by disputing with the 
doctors in the temple, Luke ii. 42, 46. 


66 


17 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. VII. 


For Jehovah shall bring upon thee, 


And upon thy people, and upon thy father’s house, 


Days, such as have not come, 


From the day that Ephraim revolted from Judah : 


—The king of Assyria. 
18 


And it shall come to pass in that day, 


Jehovah shall whistle for the fly 
Which is at the end of the streams of Egypt; 
And for the bee which is in the land of Assyria; 


19 


And they shall all of them come, and rest 


In the desolate valleys and the fissures of the rocks, 


17. The words, 1x ¥? ms, the hing 


of Assyria, Houbigant, Secker, Lowth, 
Gesenius, Hitzig, and Hendewerk, con- 
sider to have been originally a mar- 
ginal gloss, and they accordingly either 
cancel them, or put them in Italics, 
They appear, however, to have been 
rendered necessary as an epexegesis 
to the somewhat indefinite announce- 
ment which had just been made ; and, 
as the Assyrian power was to be a 
more destructive instrument in the 
hand of God against the Jews than 
the Egyptians, and was doubtless pro- 
minently in the mind of the prophet, 
I should rather conclude, with Scholz, 
that the words are genuine. At all 
events, they are found in all the MSS. 
and versions, and ought not to be ex- 
punged from the text. Under Wx, 
Assyria, is also comprehended Babylon, 
as 2 Kings xxiii. 29 ; Lam. v. 6; comp. 
Ezra vi. 22; in which last cited pas- 
sage even Darius, the king of Persia, 
is called the king of Assyria; so that 
the invasion of Nebuchadnezzar is 
predicted, as well as the incursions of 
the Assyrian kings, strictly so called. 
The punishment began to be inflicted 
by Tiglath-pileser, 2 Chron. xxviii. 16 
—21, and was renewed by Sennacherib, 
and succeeding monarchs. 

18. For the meaning of 7%, see chap. 
v.26. By »i) are meant not only flies, 
but musquitoes, gnats, &c. which are 
found in immense swarms in the 
marshes adjacent to the mouths of the 
Nile. Some idea may be formed of 
their formidable character, from the 
description given by Spencer of the 
poisonous flies which annoyed him on 


his voyage down the Danube. They 
make their appearance, he says, during 
the first great heat of summer, in 
such numbers, as to seem like large 
volumes of smoke ; their attacks are 
directed against every species of quad- 
ruped; they cover simultaneously 
every vulnerable part of the animal, 
and torture him so that he dies in a 
few hours. A more apt metaphor 
could not have been employed, by 
which to set forth the numerous army 
of the Egyptians under Pharaoh 
Necho, who slew Josiah, and exacted 
a tribute from the land of Judah of 
an hundred talents of silver and a 
talent of gold, 2 Kings xxiii. 29—35. 
—nonyn “Rk, the streams of Egypt, i.e. 
the arms of the Delta, with the sub- 
ordinate branches into which the Nile 
is divided below Cairo, chap. xi. 15.— 
m1, used collectively like the pre- 
ceding noun, for dees, and likewise 
metaphorically employed to denote 
numerous and dangerous enemies. 
Comp. Deut. i. 44; Ps. exviii. 12. 


The latter noun is the plural of πῇ, 
chap. v. 6; from nn3, Arab. 2H, 40 


cut, cut off, lay entirely waste.—7??72 sig- 
nifies a rent or fissure in a rock ; ΥἾΞΨΣ, 
the thorn bush, which Gesenius conjec- 
tures to be the lotus spinosa; Chald. 
y22 fo prick, make punctures; and 7, 
pasture ground, from 773, to guide, con- 
duct, lead out cattle, as 1272, from 131. 
The two latter nouns are intensive in 
form, the third radical being doubled. 
The design of the particular specifi- 


CHAP. VII. | 


ISATAH. 


67 


And on all the thorn-bushes, and on all the pastures. 
20 In that day shall the Lord shave with the hired razor, 
From beyond the river—the king of Assyria— 
The head, and the hair of the feet ; 
And it shall also scrape off the beard. 
21 And it shall come to pass in that day, 
That a man shall keep a young heifer and two sheep ; 


22 And it shall be, 


cation of places in this verse, was to 
intimate that the number of the in- 
vading foes would be so great, and 
that they would so completely over- 
run the country, that not even the 
most remote uninhabited parts would 
be free from them. . 

20. A further description of the As- 
syrian army which Jehovah would 
employ against the Jews.—77207 “wn. 
This noun is feminine with a mascu- 
line termination, as the 7 in 772%, and 
the femin. preformant in 720A shew; 
so that there is no necessity, with 
some, to transfer the article from the 
adjective, and read myn. Such a form 
nowhere occurs. The article is here 
used instead of the relative pronoun, 
on account of the following 772 3, 
with which the adjective is closely 
connected. The LXX., as their ren- 
dering is exhibited in the Alex. Codex, 
ἐν τῷ ξυρῷ τῷ μεμεθυσμένῳ, and after 
them the Syriac, must have read, 
ΠΥ  , most probably deeming such 
pareeo Oey parallel to that of Moses, 

eut. xxxll. 42, O72 ἘΠ YaUx. In the 
idea of the king of Assyria being 
hired, there is obviously a reference to 
the sum paid by Ahaz to that king 
for his assistance, 2 Kings xvi. 7, 8 ; 
though the hire here spoken of con- 
sisted in the booty derived from sub- 
sequent spoliations of Judea by the 
Assyrian power. Comp. Ezek. xxix. 
20.—73, in the prophetic style, signi- 
fies κατ᾽ ἐξοχὴν, the Huphrates,and does 
not require the article, which Lowth, 
on the authority of only two MSS. 
would supply. See Jer. ii. 18. That 
the plural 3¥ cannot be understood 
of the people inhabiting the regions 
beyond the Euphrates, but must sig- 
nify the regions themselves, is manifest 
from the epexegesis, Wx 7723.—D277, 


the feet, an euphemistic mode of ex- 
pression. Comp. Gen. xlix. 10; Deut. 
xxvul. 57; Isaiah xxxvi. 12, in the 
Keri.—729 properly signifies ¢o scrape, 
scrape off, and is selected for the pur- 
pose of increasing the idea of igno- 
miny, conveyed by the removal of 
the hair from the different parts of 
the body. The proper term to ex- 
press shaving is that used in the 
beginning of the verse. The import 
of this highly figurative language is, 
that, by means of the Assyrians, 
Jehovah would despoil the country 
of whatever was held in honour and 
esteem. 

21. The prophet now describes the 
state of the country after its having 
been depopulated. Owing to the want 
of men and cattle, the land would re- 
main uncultivated. Instead of nume- 
rous flocks and herds, a single cow 
and a couple of sheep would be all 
that any one would have left to him, 
Valuable vineyards would be so over- 
run with thickets, that it would be 
dangerous to enter them unarmed, on 
account of the wild beasts that made 
them their haunts; and the only 
places to which it would be found 
possible to turn out cattle, would be 
the sides of the hills, which would 
furnish abundance of pasturage for 
the few that might remain. The 
result would be, that the chief sus- 
tenance would be milk and wild honey. 
wa nay, lit. a calf of the herd, but used 
as a diminutive for a heifer, instead of 
™M2.—JN2 may either mean sheep or 
goats, being used as a generic term for 
small cattle. i 

22. After ™N subaud. x77 013, 
in niwy, lit. the making of milk: to pro- 
duce milk, like “2 τῶν, to produce fruit. 
For N97, see on ver. 15. Though at 


68 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. VII. 


That, from the abundant production of milk, they shall eat 


butter ; 


Yea, butter and honey shall every one eat, 


That is left in the land. 
23 


And it shall come to pass in that day, 


That, in every place, where there were a thousand vines, 


At a thousand pieces of silver, 


There shall be thorns and briers. 


24 


With the arrows and the bow shall men enter it; 


For the whole land shall be thorns and briers. 


25 
hoe, 


But to none of the mountains, which may be cleared with the 


Shalt thou go, afraid of thorns and briers ; 
It shall be a place to which to send the cattle; 
And where the sheep may range. 


first view, what is here specified might 
appear to be a promise of good, it is 
in effect a denunciation of evil: the 
abundance being limited to the two 
articles mentioned, instead of being 
extended to the great variety result- 
ing from a state of agricultural pros- 
perity. The 3 has no reference what- 
ever to ver. 15, as Hendewerk would 
construe it. It merely asserts that 
the articles of food would be such as 
an uncultivated state of the country 
would afford. There having been a 
diminution of the inhabitants, the 
land would lie waste, and be occupied 
only by nomades. The bees also, un- 
molested, would have an opportunity 
of gathering abundance of honey. 

23. FDI ANZ 183 AWN is descriptive of 
large and productive vineyards. The 
vines are supposed to have been of so 
excellent a kind, that they were esti- 
mated at a silver shekel a piece. D2 
stands for 72970, the fuller form. 
Burkhardt mentions, that on Mount 
Lebanon, in 1811, the vines were sold 
at the price of a piastre each, 7. ὁ. 
about one shilling and seven pence 
sterling. The silver shekel was equal 
to two shillings three pence farthing 
and a half. That the estimate of 
the prophet refers to the sale, and not 


to the annual rent of the vines, seems 
beyond dispute; for though it is 
stated, Song viii. 11, that each of the 
keepers of Solomon’s vineyard at Ba- 
alhamon was to pay ADD FRX, a thou- 
sand shekels, yet it is expressly said to 
be the produce of the fruit, and no 
mention is made of the number of 
the vines. 

24, 25. The occurrence of ΠΕ, fear, 
in connexion with the briers and 
thorns in the latter of these verses, 
shews that the employment of the 
bow and arrows was not for the pur- 
pose of hunting the wild beasts, but 
for self-protection. i872 signifies 
all the low and level parts of the 
country that had been cultivated ; 
with which are contrasted 0777 %, 
the hilly or mountainous regions men- 
tioned in the following verse. A new 
beginning might be made to cultivate 
the ground, yet not with oxen, as in 
prosperous times, but only with hand 
implements. 

NNY—NiINN? has occasioned con- 
siderable difficulty, but entirely owing 
to the verb having been taken in the 
third person feminine. If read as the 
second masculine all is plain, Supply 
y2 before πεν, 


CHAP. VIII.| 


ISAIAH. 


69 


CHAPTER ὙΠ]. 


Isaiah reverts in this chapter to the subject of the overthrow of the confede- 


rate powers of Israel and Syria by the king of Assyria. 


He relates the 


measures which he was directed to employ for notifying the certainty and 
proximity of the event, 1—4 ; denounces the Divine judgments against the 
ten tribes for their rebellious conduct, 5—8; gives assurances that the 
machinations and attempts which were directed against Judah, should prove 
abortive, 9, 10; exhorts to persevering confidence in God, and his revela- 

tions, 11—20 ; and describes the calamitous condition of the inhabitants of 
Ephraim, in consequence of the Assyrian invasion, 21, 22. 


1 Anp Jehovah commanded me: Take thee a large tablet, and 
write upon it with a man’s writing instrument, For MAunEr- 


1. The prophet first receives a com- 
mand to exhibit, in large characters, 
words prognostic of the sudden attack 
of the Assyrian army; and then 
another, to give them as a symbolical 
name to a son that was to be born to 
him, 73, not ὦ roll, as if derived 
from 2, ¢o roll, roll up; but a tablet, 
or smooth plate, from 133, to make bare ; 


mW 


Arab. uss to polish. The Hebrews 


not only used m2, rolls of linen, skin, 
&c., but likewise ¢adlets of polished 
brass, stone, or wood, for the purposes 
of writing, which last were either 
simple, or covered with wax. Among 
the ancients, the materials on which 
it was customary to write, differed 
according to the different purposes of 
the writing. Stone, brass, lead, wood, 
and the like, were employed when the 
design was to promulgate public de- 
crees, or record memorable events for 
posterity. For common or private 
purposes, the more usual materials 
were leaves, the inner bark of trees, 
wooden tablets covered with wax, 
ivory, linen cloth and papyrus, or 
Egyptian paper. The laws of Solon 
were inscribed on tablets of wood, 
called ἄξονες. To such tablets the 
Greeks also gave the name of κύρβεις. 
See Eschenburg’s Man. of Class. Lit. 
These tablets were likewise called in 


Hebrew nim, and were employed by 
the prophets for the purpose of pub- 
licly exhibiting such portions of their 
communications as had some imme- 
diate object in view. Chap. xxx. 8; 
Hab. ii. 2. Isaiah was commanded, 
on the present occasion, to take a /arge 
tablet, in order that there might be 
ample space for the words being writ- 
ten in large characters, that, when 
exposed in public, they might be 
easily legible by all. For the same 
reason, Habakkuk was ordered to make 
the words of his vision plain by dig- 
ging them deep into the material 
which he employed, chap. 11, 2.— 
Wx OM, lit. the pen of man, but used 
idiomatically for a common pen, just as 
ἀριθμὸς ἀνθρώπου, Rey. xii. 18, means 
an ordinary wamber ; and μέτρον ἀν- 
θρώπου, Rev. xxi. 17,a measure common 
among men. Thus, also, in the N, Τὶ 
a thing is said to be κατ᾽ ἄνθρωπον 
when it is in accordance with the | 
usual views, dispositions, or practices 

of men. lLowth’s version, “a work- 
mans graving tool,’ is not borne out 
by Hebrew usage. The 01) was pro- 
perly the style, στύλος, γραφεῖον, yAv- 
φεῖον, employed for writing on harder 
materials, It was made of iron or 
ivory, pointed at the one end, and 
broad at the other for the purpose of 
erasing letters, especially when they 


I 


70 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. VIII. 


2 sHALAL-Hasn-BaAz; and that I should take unto me faithful 
witnesses, Urijah the priest, and Zechariah theson of Jeberechiah. 
3 And I went to the prophetess, and she conceived and bare a 
son; and Jehovah said to me: Call his name MAHER-SHALAL- 


4 Hasn-Baz. For before the 


child shall know to ery “My 


Father” and “My Mother,” the wealth of Damascus, and the 


were written on tablets covered with 
wax. The word, however, is not to 
be taken literally in this passage, but 
metonymically, for characters, or the 
letters formed by the pen; as we say: 
a person writes a good hand, his style 
is excellent, &. Thus the Targ. 
oH 202, a clear writing. Some sup- 
pose that ordinary writing is here 
opposed to hierotic characters ; but 
there is no reason to suppose that the 
Jewish priests employed a peculiar 
alphabet, except, indeed, we assume, 
that in the time of the prophet the 
ancient Phoenician forms of the letters 
were confined to the sacred Scriptures, 
and that others, more approximating 
to the square letters now in use, had 
come to be employed for ordinary 
writings, which is not altogether des- 
titute of probability. The Arabs have 
their Kufic and Neshi characters ; the 
Syrians their Estrangelo and Peshito ; 
and the Persians, their Neshki, Taalic, 
and Shekesteh.—The writing was to 
consist of the four words, 12 OT 978 379. 
The > belongs to the entire inscription, 
and is used like the Greek τό, prefixed 
to a clause. Though the former of 
the two words is in the infinitive, yet 
the latter, being the third person of 
the Preterite, shews that they are 
both to be rendered as finite forms : 
He hastes to the spoil, he speeds to the 
prey. The nominative is the Assyrian 
monarch understood. 

2. τον, The paragogic 7 evinces 
that this verb is not to be construed 
as a converted future, but as a future 
subjunctive, prosecuting in indirect 
language what had been commenced 
in the direct form. The persons to 
be selected as witnesses to the fact, 
that the prophet had written the 
words in question at the time, were 
two of distinguished notoriety at 
Jerusalem; the one, the High Priest, 
who, though he afterwards humoured 


the king in the matter of the Syrian 
altar, 2 Kings xvi. 10—16, was at the 
time possessed of great weight and 
authority ; and the other, in all proba- 
bility, filled the prophetical office. 
They were both 09283, persons worthy 
of credit, whose testimony in reference 
to the matter might be relied on. 

3. 298) begins a new paragraph, 
and describes what took place subse- 
quent to the performance of what was 
enjoined in the preceding verses. 
The term is euphemistic. Comp. 


Gen. xx. 4; the Arab. Ley 35 35, ne 
ergo approvimetis illis, Koran. Sur. ii. 
183; and the Eth TPAM, as 
A tT PN: Ne accedas ad eam,i.e. 


ne concumbas cum ea. Hom. Marize.— 
The name 1), prophetess, does not 
imply that she was such officially, 
but merely indicates her relation to 
Isaiah. There is no ground whatever 
for supposing that she was any other 
than the mother of Shear-jashub ; 
and every attempt to identify her 
with the 2%, chap. vii. 14, has failed. 
—The words which had been inscribed 
on the tablet are appropriated as a 
symbolical name of the new-born son 
of the prophet. It is the longest of 
any of the Scripture names; but has 
its parallels in this respect in other 
languages, especially in our own at the 
time of the Commonwealth. 

4, 8 and ἘΝ are onomatopoética, 
and are found in numerous languages ; 
only in most the consonants precede 
the vowels. ‘Thus the Turkish and 


Persic bb ; the Greek πάπας, πάππας, 


hence παππάζειν; μάμα, pappa, μάμμη 5 
and our own papa, mamma, contracted 
pa, ma. The reason of the transfer of 
the mysterious words to the child is 
assigned, and the meaning is, that in 


CHAP. VIII. | 


ISATAH. 


71 


spoil of Samaria, shall be carried away before the king of 


Assyria. 


5 And Jehovah further spake to me, saying: 


6 Because this people despiseth 


The waters of Shiloah, which flow softly, 

And have their joy in Rezin, the son of Remaliah ; 
7 Therefore, behold, the Lord will bring up upon them 

The strong and mighty waters of the river— 

The king of Assyria and all his glory :— 


little more than a year, both Syria and 
Ephraim should be conquered.—xw, 
impersonally, oxe shall carry away, for 
shall be carried away.—VWs 0 ἜΡ, 
“before the king of Assyria.’ There 
is here an allusion to the ancient 
custom of carrying in triumph before 
the victor the spoils taken from the 
enemy. For the fulfiment, see 2 
Kings xv. 29, xvi. 9. 

5, 6. Gesenius and others endeavour 
to shew, that the people referred to 
in these verses are the Jews, and not 
the ten tribes; but the assumption of 
defection from Ahaz, on the part of 
the great body of the nation who had 
joined the enemy, which is necessary 
to support the hypothesis, is entirely 
without foundation. 37 Dy7, though 
spoken by Isaiah in Judah, refers to 
the foreigners who were the subject 
of the preceding prediction, and who 
are further described as exulting in 
the valour and prowess of their kings. 
Self-confident, they treated with con- 
tempt the Jewish state—WD Ὁ, the 
water of Shiloah, flowed from M7 N2}3, 
the pool of Shelah, Neh. iii. 15, and was 
conveyed by an aqueduct to the royal 
residence. See note on chap. vii. 3. 
Owing, perhaps, to this latter circum- 
stance, or to that of the king’s being 
anointed in the vicinity, 1 Kings i. 
32—40, it was employed as an image 
of the house of David. Considering 
its noiseless flow and diminutive size, 
it formed a most appropriate emblem 
of the state of that house at the time, 
in reference to its enemies; and was 
selected by the prophet in order to 
contrast with it the large and resistless 
Euphrates, vers. 7 and 8, the emblem 
of the king of Assyria. win, Hitzig 
takes to be the Infinitive Construct of 


wp, which, though not in use, he 
considers to be the same as 002, fo 
melt, be afraid of ; and renders, “And 
are afraid of Rezin and the son of 
Remaliah;” but it is better, with 
Gesenius, Rosenmiiller, and Hende- 
werk, to regard it as the noun v9, 
in the Construct state, only used for 
the Infinitive. The Construct is thus 
the genitive of object, not of pos- 
Session. 

7. That by "027 Ὁ, as opposed to 
ria Ὁ, ver. 6, we are to understand 
the Zuphrates, is beyond dispute. 
This noble river, so frequently referred 
to in Scripture, has its source in the 
mountains of Armenia, and running 
in a south and south-easterly direction, 
and, uniting with the Tigris below 
Babylon, flows into the Persian gulf, 
As far as Bir it is impetuous in its 
course; after this it flows more or 
less gently through the plains of 
Mesopotamia ; but, like the Nile, has 
its annual inundations, in consequence 
of the melting of the snow in Ar- 
menia, during which it often covers 
great part of the adjacent country. 
To prevent, as much as possible, the 
injury committed by these inunda- 
tions, and to divert the water so as 
profitably to irrigate the fields, nume- 
rous canals were dug, and embank- 
ments were raised, some of which 
were of considerable strength. These 
canals the prophet calls D758, which 
is used both of pipes or tubes, Job xl. 
18, and of the beds or channels of 
streams, Ezek. xxxii. 6, and by me- 
tonymy of brooks, and the valleys 
through which they flow, Ps. xlii. 2; 
Job vi. 15.—3, a bank or embankment ; 


Chald. ὅτ», a wall; Arab. d=, ὦ shore, 


72 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. VIII. 


And it shall rise over all its channels, 


And pass over all its banks, 
And shall flow into Judah, 


Overflowing and passing through ; 


It shall reach to the neck ; 


And the spreadings of his wings 


Shall cover the entire breadth 


or coast.—iH13°%3) VOX 772 Mx, the king 
of Assyria and all his glory, Gesenius, 
and some other German writers, con- 
sider to be a gloss; but the style is 
quite in keeping with chap. vii. 17, 20, 
and the frequent use of such epexe- 
gesis was necessary, that the Jews 
might have no excuse for their un- 
belief in the alleged obscurity of 
figurative language. By the 123, glory, 
of the king of Assyria, is to be under- 
stood his zoble warriors. Nothing 
could more fitly represent the incur- 
sion of a large and powerful army, 
than the inundation of a river, which 
breaks through every barrier that is 
thrown in its way, and sweeps all 
before it. 

8. Though the Assyrian power was 
first to invade the land of Israel, and 
carry away its spoils, it is here added, 
that Judah also should suffer. The 
prophecy was fulfilled in the days of 
Hezekiah, when Sennacherib spread 
his troops over the whole country, 
and might figuratively be said to 
“reach even to the neck,” when he 
besieged Jerusalem. The metropolis 
alone held its head above the water. 
The verbs *7, ow, and 73¥, are chiefly 
employed to increase the effect of the 
description; yet there is the most 
exact propriety in the order in which 
they occur ; 420, signifying to pass out 
of one condition into another, indi- 
cates the commencement of the inun- 
dation; 2, the overwhelming rush 
of the waters into the country; and 
12Y, their progress across its surface. 
Comp. the Iliad, E. 87, &c: 

Θῦνε yap ἀμπεδίον, ποταμῷ πλήθοντι 

ἐοικὼς, 

Χειμάῤῥῳ, dor’ ὦκα ῥέων. 

D232. The prophet here drops the 
figure of an overflowing river, and 
employs that of the extended wings of 
a bird, which, in various languages, are 


of thy land, O IMMANUEL! 


applied to the flanks or side-bodies of 
an army, because of their stretching 
out from the centre, and covering the 
ground which they occupy. See chap. 
xvili.l. In the same acceptation, D228 
is used, Ezek, xii. 14; xvii. 21; xxxviii. 
6. Chald. 73, @ wing.—ni®2 is a verbal 
noun from the Hophal of 3, fo extend. 
—ywoy aw. That the latter word 
is here to be regarded as the name to 
be given to the child whose birth is 
predicted, chap. vii. 14, and that he is 
personally addressed, is the construc- 
tion put upon the passage in the 
Syriac version and that of Saadias, 
and is admitted both by Gesenius and 
Hitzig. On the principle of the former 
of these commentators, it cannot be 
denied that Judea might be ealled the 
land of Immanuel, because it was his 
native country; but if by Immanuel 
we are to understand, not the son of 
the prophet, nor any child then born, 
or shortly to be born, but the promised 
Messiah: then, though it will hold 
true that Judea was his country in 
that sense, it must also be maintained 
that it was his in a still higher sense, 
—namely, that in which it is called 
mm mow, chap. xiv. 2; 77 YX, Hos. 
ix. 3; τὰ ἴδια, John i. 11,—not so 
much the country to which he be- 
longed, as that which belonged to 
him; his own peculiar property. The 
suddenness of the apostrophe requires 
this interpretation, since it would be 
utterly pointless were we to assume 
that any ordinary person was meant. 
“Plena igitur sententia est: copiz 
hostiles pervadent et replebunt terram 
tuam, O Immanuel! Ergo si terra hac 
sit terra tua, si id es vere quod tuum 
nomen significat, miserere populi tui 
et fer opem. Immanuelem futurum 
Deum ipsum natura humana induen- 
dum, vidimus, supra ad vil. 14.” 
Rosenm. ἐμ Joc. 


CHAP. ΥὙ111.]} 


ISAIAH. 


73 


9 Be enraged, O ye people, yet ye shall be broken in pieces— 
And hear it, all ye distant parts of the earth: 
Gird you, yet ye shall be broken in pieces ; 
Gird you, yet ye shall be broken in pieces. 


10 


Form a purpose, yet it shall be defeated ; 


Speak the word, yet it shall not stand ; 


- For Gop IS WITH US. 


For thus said Jehovah to me, 


with a mighty impulse, 


And warned me not to walk in the way of this people, saying, 


12 


Ye shall not say, There is a confederacy, 


Of any thing whereof this people may say, There is a confederacy : 


9. The prophet now turns abruptly 
to the immediate enemies of Judah ; 
and while he summons distant nations 
to listen to his prediction, he ironically 
commands the former to put forth 
their utmost energies, with the assur- 
ance that it would only issue in their 
own destruction.—™, Secker and 
Lowth, on no other authority than 
that of the LXX., would read ©, 
γνώτε, know ye; but they have not 
even the support of a parallelism, to 
which the Bishop appeals; for the 
next clause of the verse is manifestly 
parenthetical. Some would derive 
the verb from πρὶ, to be friendly, asso- 
ciate, &c. and refer to Prov. xviii. 24 
for a confirmation of such derivation ; 
but that passage requires »yn7 to be 
rendered, destroyeth himself—the result 
of his propensity to be always in 
company. It can only properly be 
taken here as the Imper. of YY}, in the 
signification of raging, giving tumul- 
tuous vent to an evil disposition. The 
repetitions which follow are for the 
sake of emphasis. For xn, Hitzig 
aptly compares the full form x78 
Psa ὍΣ, Job xxxviil. 3. When two 
imperatives occur, as in this verse, 
the former is ironically concessive, 
and the latter declarative or minatory. 

10, A continuation of the preceding, 
both as to form and meaning, The 
form 12» likewise occurs, Jud. xix. 30, 
and in a similar combination, 27) 92». 
It is contracted from ἸΞῚν".--- τ 721 
refers to the issuing of orders to carry 
into effect the purposes formed in the 
council of the enemy.—8 9Y is here 
to be taken, not as the name of 


IMMANUEL, but as an appropriation of 
its import ; not, however, without a 
recognition of Him to whom the name 
belonged. Jerome resolves it thus: 
“nobiscum est Deus, id est, Emmanuel.” 
Except we put this construction upon 
the words, we must suppose the pro- 
phet simply to introduce the name of 
the Great Deliverer, “For IMMANUEL,” 
—and then leave the conclusion to be 
drawn from its signification: but such 
an instance of abrupt ἀτελείωσις is, I 
believe, without example in the He- 
brew Scriptures. 

11. WI np, lit. with the strength of 
the hand, or his hand, meaning ὦ mighty 
impulse. Tis frequently used to denote 
the Divine impulse experienced by the 
prophets in a state of inspiration; 
hence it is said to be upon them, come, 
fall upon them, Ezek. i. 3; 2 Kings iii. 
15; Ezek. vii. 1. In Ezek. iii. 14, we 
have ΠῚ myn V, the hand of Jehovah 
was strong upon me, which is equivalent 
to the Infinitive form here employed. 
Thus the Targ. 8ns12) ApNNa, iz the 
power of prophecy. “Taking me by 
the hand,” which is Lowth’s rendering, 
is, therefore, erroneous; as is his 
substitution of 3 for 3, though upwards 
of forty MSS., eight printed Editions, 
the Syriac, and Symmachus in Pro- 
copius, have the former reading. 

12. Wp, from Wp, ἐο bind, may either 
signify ὦ conspiracy within a state, or 
a confederacy against it from without. 
It is used here in the latter accepta- 
tion, to denote the league between 
the kings of Israel and Syria. Σκληρὸν 
of the LXX. has arisen from their 
erroneously reading πῦρ, instead of 


T's) 


74 ISAIAH. [CHAP. VIII. 


Be not ye afraid with their fear ; 


Neither do ye dread. 


18. Jehovah of Hosts himself ye shall sanctify ; 
He shall be your fear, and he your dread. 
14 For he shall become a Sanctuary ; 
But a stone to strike against, and a rock of stumbling 


To both the houses of Israel ; 


A snare and a trap to the inhabitants of Jerusalem. 
τας And: many shall stumble at them, and fall, and be broken, 


wp, a mistake easily made. The 
idea of idolatrous objects of wor- 
ship, which Lowth introduces, as a 
conjecture of Secker’s, altering and 
transposing the letters of the word 
into τ, is not borne out by usage, 
and is quite foreign to the passage. 
While the Israelites might boast of 
the confederacy as formidable, and the 
unbelieving Jews might view it in the 
same light, the prophet was strictly 
charged not to imitate them, (n2% 
7273,) since, in the Divine estimation, 
it was undeserving of the name ; and 
would, by the instrumentality em- 
ployed by God, speedily be broken 
up.— nw, the genitive of object, that 
of which they are afraid. 

18. DKW and dz WwW are likewise 
genitives of object. The addition of 
ink, Hr, to the preceding accusative, 
gives peculiar emphasis in such con- 
nexion. ΤῸ sanctify God, means here 
to cherish and evince a due sense of 
his character, as worthy of entire 
confidence, being able to defeat all 
the enemies of his people, and faith- 
ful to fulfil his promises of protection 
and deliverance. Comp. 1 Pet. iii. 14, 
15, where the words are quoted ad 
sensum ; and, according to the reading 
Κύριον τὸν Χριστὸν, found in the MSS. 
A BC 7, 13, 33 in Marg. 69, 137, and 
others ; both the Syriac versions ; the 
Arab. of Erpen., the Coptic, Sahidic, 
Armenian, Vulgate, Clement, and 
Fulgentius, are applied expressly to 
our Saviour, in whom Christians are 
commanded to place the same reli- 
gious confidence which the prophet 
challenges for Jehovah of Hosts. 

14, 15, way, suggested by Ww pH, 
ver. 13: ὦ sanctuary in the sense of 
asylum or refuge, to which persons fled 


from those who would deprive them 
of life. Among the ancients, altars, 
temples, and other sacred places, 
afforded such protection, no person 
daring to shed blood, or do violence 
to any who had placed themselves in 
immediate contact with the deities 
supposed to be there resident. Pollux. 
Onomast. lib. i, cap. 1.  Pausan. 
Corinth. lib. ii. cap. 19, Calmet, Asy- 
lum. That the same privilege was 
claimed and enjoyed by the Hebrews 
appears from Exod. xxi. 13, 14; 1 
Kings i. 50, 51 ; ii. 28; though in the 
latter instance, in accordance with the 
Mosaic enactment, it was withheld 
from a notorious murderer. Though 
wp is the term otherwise employed 
for refuge, that here used occurs again 
in the same acceptation, Ezek. xi. 16. 
The LXX., in which it is more com- 
monly rendered ἅγιον and ἁγιάσμα, 
has ἁγιάσμον in the present instance, 
which has given rise to iz sanctifica- 
tionem of the Vulg. and a similar 
rendering in versions derived from 
the same source. What shews that 
it is to be understood in the sense of 
asylum, is the antithesis in which it 
stands to the following words, 422 }28 
and 22 wz: in the use of which 
there is an evident rise in the idea, 
—a rock being more than a stone, 
and stumbling so as completely to fall, 
more than sfriking one’s foot against 
a stone. Both combinations, however, 
are intended to express the occasion 
of injury and ruin to those who are 
the subjects of such fall. The cir- 
cumstance, that both the houses of 
Israel, and especially the inhabitants 
of Jerusalem, are particularly specified, 
together with the distinction made, 
verses 15 and 16, between the many . 


Ἂ 


CHAP. VIII. | 


ISAIAH. 


75 


And shall be ensnared and taken. 


16 Bind up the testimony ; 
Seal the law for my disciples. 
17 I also will wait for Jehovah, 


who should “be ensnared,” &c. and 
“the disciples of the Lord,’ evinces 
that something very different from 
the Babylonish captivity must be 
meant. The true interpretation is 
furnished in the inspired prediction 
of Simeon, Luke ii. 34, and the equally 
inspired application of the passage by 
Paul, Rom. ix. 32, 33; and by Peter, 
1 Epist. 11. 8. That it was also re- 
garded by the more ancient Rabbins 
to refer to the Messiah, is manifest 
from a passage in the book of the 
Talmud, entitled Sanhedrin, in which 
it is expressly applied to him as the 
Son of David, who was to come after 
the subversion of the two divisions 
of the Hebrew people ; see Raymundi 
Pug. Fid. Edit. Carpzov. p. 405. The 
accomplishment we find in the salva- 
tion enjoyed by believers in the 
Redeemer, and the aggravated and 
still continuing ruin of the Jews— 
D2 is not to be rendered “among 
them,” as in our common version : 
the pron. suff. belonging to 13 and 
wz; and the 3 being required after 
782, to indicate that against which any 
one stumbles. This verb is here a 
vox pregnans, and includes 423, ¢o 
strike, strike the foot against any object. 
For the idea of ensnarement, comp. 
Prov. vi. 2; Isaiah xxvii. 13; Rom. 
χη 9: 

16. TPA occurs only here, and Ruth 
iv. 7, where it is used to denote an 
established testimony. It 15. equi- 
valent to nv, both being derived from 
ἬΝ, to bear witness, testify.—D 2) is 
employed twice besides by our pro- 
phet, chap. 1. 4, and liv. 13, and by 
him alone; and here denotes those 
who were taught by the Messiah to 
make him their 37), sanctuary, im 
contradistinction from those who 
stumbled at him to their utter ruin, 
ver. 15. The LXX, have strangely 


misunderstood this verse, rendering. 


it, τότε φανεροὶ ἔσονται οἱ σφραγιζόμενοι 
τὸν νόμον τοῦ μὴ μαθεῖν ; but Aquila 
has given it rightly, ἔνδησον μαρτύριον" 


σφράγισαι νόμον ἐν τοῖς διδακτοῖς pov. 
Gesenius takes much pains to prove 
that the reference is to verses 1, 2; 
but Hitzig shews that the position is 
utterly untenable. The verb 1 can 
only properly apply to the wrapping 
up of a ἜΘ, or volume, and cannot 
without violence be used in reference 
to a large tablet. Besides, the tablet 
was designed to be hung up in public, 
and not be handed down to posterity. 
The words apply to the prophetic 
testimonies which had just been borne 
to the Messiah, and other prophetic 
matter then in existence, together 
with the law, in its more extended 
signification, as comprising the rest of 
the Jewish Scriptures. These might 
be unheeded, or misconstrued, as in- 
deed they were, by the great body of 
the nation ; but they would minister 
needful instruction and comfort to 
the disciples of Christ. For their 
benefit, they were carefully to be 
preserved. 3 denotes the relation of 
effect, as Ps. Ixviii, 19, D2 ΤῊΣ ANP, 
“thou hast received gifts for men,” 
i.e. with a view to their benefit, 
Vitringa’s construction, which takes 
3in the sense of zz, is founded upon 
an interpretation of 2, which he 
supposes to be the root of the verb, 
altogether unwarranted by Hebrew 
usage. The passages he adduces yield 
it no support.—The speaker is not 
the prophet, but the Messiah whom 
the Jews were to reject, but who here 
evinces his care for those who should 
not be offended in him, but who 
should humbly receive his doctrines. 
17, 18. The same person who speaks 
in the preceding verse continues his 
discourse in these. To apply them to 
Isaiah would disturb the unity of the 
passage, and subject it to the operation 
of principles which would unsettle the 
foundations of all consistent inter- 
pretation. The words have no reference 
to the symbolical names given to two 
of his children, as the connexion 
clearly evinces ; and to view them as 


76 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. VIII. 


Who hideth his face from the house of Jacob, 


And I will expect him. 


18 Behold I and the children whom Jehovah hath given me, 
Are for signs and wonders in Israel ; 


From Jehovah of Hosts, 


Who dwelleth in mount Zion. 


19 And when they shall say to you, 
Apply to the necromancers and the wizards, 


typical in their import, it must be 
shewn, on solid scriptural grounds, in 
what respects the prophet was a type 
of Christ, and how Shear-jashub and 
Maher-shalal-Hash-baz were types of 
the apostles, or of Christians gene- 
rally. Isaiah was, indeed, constituted 
nao nix, a sign and a wonder, on occa- 
sion of the expedition of Tartan, but 
he continued to be such only for three 
years ; and then he was not a type of 
the Messiah, but of the denuded 
Egyptians and Ethiopians whom that 
general was to carry into captivity, 
chap. xx. Thus also Ezekiel is said 
to have been nin, a wonder, chap. 
xxiv. 24, because his appearance and 
conduct on a particular occasion were 
designed to excite astonishment, and 
draw the attention of the Jews to 
their approaching desolate and un- 
happy condition. The associates of 
Joshua the high priest are called ‘tix 
nin, men of wonder, or, as Le Clerc 
translates, viri portentost. Nor can it 
be shewn that, in accordance with 
Scripture usage, the two sons of the 
prophet were siyus and wonders, merely 
because they bore symbolical names. 
The terms are always used of persons 
or other visible objects, never of ap- 
pellations, and cannot, without the 
utmost harshness, be otherwise inter- 
preted. 

That the words are those of the 
Messiah may be safely maintained on 
the authority of Heb. ii. 13, where 
they are quoted precisely in the same 
unqualified style in which in the pre- 
ceding verse a quotation is made from 
the twenty-second Psalm, the whole 
of which is strictly and exclusively 
prophetical of Christ. The object of 
the apostle is not to give prominence 
to the latter half of the 18th verse 


in Isaiah, but simply to prove a joint 
participation in human nature between 
the Saviour and those whom he came 
to redeem. He therefore stops at 
θεός, with the LXX., who divide the 
sentence, and introduce the latter 
part of it with καὶ ἔσται. The senti- 
ment of ver. 17 is precisely that found 
in Ps.’ xl. 1,‘ Txix’'33 Isa? ἘΠῚ 3 Ga 
which the Messiah expresses his trust 
in God, and employs other language 
appropriate to his state of humiliation. 
Every attempt to relieve the supposed 
difficulty in the quotation by having 
recourse to the argument ea concessis, 
the double sense, or simple accommo- 
dation, must fail to afford satisfaction 
to persons of inquiring mind, See 
Pierce, Macknight, and M’Lean, on 
Heb. ii. 13.—The sense in which 
Christ and his disciples were to be 
signs and wonders is determined by the 
inspired construction put upon the 
prophecy by Simeon, σημεῖον ἀντιλεγό- 
μενον, “a sign to be spoken against.” 
Though miraculous in their character, 
mission, and operations, and though 
they should excite feelings of astonish- 
ment in their contemporaries, they 
should nevertheless meet with the 
most determined opposition. This 
view quite accords with the context, 
ver. 14, and with fact, Heb. xii. 3; 
1 Cor. iv. 9; Acts xiii. 45, xxviii. 22, 
The compound proposition Dy, indi- 
cates that the character, &c. of Messiah 
and his disciples was not formed by 
any pre-existent causes, but was the 
result of new causes immediately in- 
troduced by Divine volition. See 
chap. vii. 11; xxix. 6. 

19. The prophet returns to his own 
times, and warns the nation against 
the superstition and imposture to 
which they were exposed during the 


CHAP.. VIII. | 


ISAIAH. 


rig 


Who chirp and mutter, ask ye: 

Should not a people apply to their God ? 

Should they apply for the living to the dead ? 
20 To the law and to the testimony ! 


period of calamity before predicted. 
In the early history of the Hebrew 
people, these evils appear to have 
had more or less influence, not- 
withstanding the strict prohibitions 
of the law, Deut. xviii. 9—12; but 
as we proceed in the history they 
greatly increase upon us. In the 
reign of such an idolatrous king as 
Ahaz, their prevalence was particu- 
larly to be expected.—01 primarily 
signifies to tread, frequent, &c.; with 
x, to go, apply to, for assistance, direc- 
tion, &e., to consult God, an oracle, 
idols, &. Comp. 8 2x, Deut. xviii. 
11.—ninx, mas. with a fem. termina- 


tion: from 3s, or x, Arab. wil, 


reverlitur, to return, come to one’s senses ; 
necromancers OY sorcerers, who pretend 
to recall the dead from the invisible 
world by means of incantations ; and 
the spirits themselves thus supposed to be 
evoked, as occupying or possessing the 
bodies of such conjurers. On this 
latter account, such necromancers 
were called UN7Mi7Y3, Hix "Wa, i.e. possessed 
of the Οὐ, or spirit, called back for 
purposes of divination ; and as these 
impostors assumed an inflated appear- 
ance, that it might be believed they 
were filled with the spirit, and gave 
forth unaccountable utterances while 
in that state, the LXX. render the 
word by ἐγγαστρίμυθοι, ventriloquists. 


In Coptic O¥ HA, ov, signifies an 


Egyptian priest who occupies himself 
with divinations; and in Africa and 
the West Indies a species of witch- 
craft, called Obeah, is practised among 
the negroes, which operates power- 
fully on their fears, and often issues 
in death.—02n, wizards, (from wise,) 


comp. the Arab. k, Limon ; ᾿Ελύμας 


opayos, Acts xiii. 8, knowing ones; Rabbin. 
PIM, πύθωνες, hence πνεῦμα πύθωνος, 
a spirit of Python, or divination, Acts 
xvi. 16, ‘The term is employed in con- 
nexion with nix, to denote persons who 
professed to have intercourse with the 


world of spirits, and were supposed to 
have the power of revealing secrets ; 
and, likewise, the spirits with whom it 
was thought they communicated. See 
Lev. xix. 31, xx. 27; Deut. xviii. 11; 1 
Sam xxviii. 3—11.—o»px5u07, lit. the 
chirpers, from ΒΞ, which occurs only 


in Pilpel, Arab. a.ar0, passer, and 


is onomatopoétic, expressing the chirp- 
ing or piping of young birds, especially 
swallows. Chap. x. 14, xxix. 4, xxxviil. 
14. It beautifully expresses the small 
distant sounds produced by the necro- 
mancers.—O'3797, the mutterers; root 
70, to murmur, mutter, utter inarticulate 
sounds, to speak in a low, hollow man- 
ner, aS if the voice came from the 
earth. See chap. xxix. 4.— va is used 
here, not in its substitutionary accep- 
tation, but as signifying ἐμ behalf of, 
720» the benefit of, as Gen. xx. 7; Ps. 
Ixxii. 15; Jer. xxi. 2. The interroga- 
tive 7 dropping the δ", and the verb, 
are to be supplied from the preceding 
hemistich. The absurdity of demon- 
ology is forcibly pointed out in this 
appeal. 

20. This verse directs to the only 
source whence certain religious infor- 
mation is to be obtained, The law and 
the testimony ; by which, with reference 
to ver. 16, we are obviously to under- 
stand, the will of God revealed in his 
word. For the use of 2 here, compare 
Judg. vii. 18, putz mid. The clause 
amo px Wx, has greatly perplexed 
interpreters. The LXX., who render 
the whole verse oddly, have περὶ οὗ 
οὐκ ἔστι δῶρα δοῦναι περὶ αὐτοῦ, in 
which they are followed by the Syr. 
and other versions derived from them ; 
mistaking WW for 118, a gift, or present. 
In every other passage in which this 
word occurs, it signifies either fhe 
aurora, Or morning dawn; or, meta- 
phorically, the commencement of a 
state of prosperity after a period of 
affliction, See espec. chap. xlvii. 11. 


i= in the Arab. has the same signi- 
fication, which is also that best suited 
K 


78 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. VIII. 


If they speak not according to this word, 
There shall be no dawn to them: 


21 


But they shall pass through the land, distressed and famished ; 


And it shall be, when they are famished, 
They shall be inwardly vexed, and shall curse 
Their king and their God; and shall look upward. 


22 


They shall also fix their eyes on the earth ; 


But behold! affliction and darkness ; 
They shall be darkened with distress, 


Driven into gloom. 


to the following context. The idea 
conveyed by the words is this: Those 
who teach differently from the Scrip- 
tures, and all who listen to such 
teachers, shall continue under the 
judgment of God: they can expect no 
prosperity. Lowth’s rendering, ‘‘in 
which is no obscurity,’ cannot be 
justified from usage. Joel ii. 2, the 
only passage to which he appeals in 
support of it, is decidedly against him. 
The prophet there drops the idea of 
affliction, which he had employed 
different appropriate terms to express, 
and proceeds to describe the cause of 
the affiction—the invading army, 
which he compares to the Aurora, or 
the rays of light quickly breaking in 
upon the horizon, and widely diffusing 
themselves upon the mountains.— ex, 
which has presented considerable 
difficulty, is merely the sign of the 
apodosis, then, in that case, and in 
translation may be omitted as redun- 
dant. See Gesen. Lex. Man. iz voc. Ὁ. 
8,.—*) stands collectively for 075, which 
is found in one of Kennicott’s MSS., 
and is the rendering of the Vulg., 
“non erit es matutina lux;” or DY, 
people, may be understood: either will 
account for the sing. which is carried 
forward in the following verse. 

21, 22. The prophet here describes 
in strong language the desperate con- 
dition of those who reject the Divine 
word and adhere to their own devices, 
or to thesinfulinventionsand practices 
of men.—i73, 7.e. $83, ἐμ the land, which, 
though not occurring in the preceding 
context, is understood. This idiom is 


not uncommon in Hebrew, see Ps. 
Ixviii. 15, Ixxxvii. 1, where the noun 
which follows is anticipated, just as 
yas is here from ver. 22. Schroeder, 
however, takes the 7 in a zeufer sense, 
and supposes it to refer to the state 
or circumstances of those just spoken 
of: but_see Gesenius, Lehrg. p. 740.— 
mop, hardly circumstanced, in a state of 
great distress.—227n7 In Hithp. is 
more expressive than the simple form 
of Kal would have been. It denotes 
the inward workings of rage before it 
is vented against its object.—v7s) 1572 
are in apposition: their king, who is 
their God; or their king, even their God. 
When God as the head of the Theo- 
cracy, and the king as his vicegerent, 
are spoken of, the order is always, 
“God and the king,” 1 Kings xxi. 13; 
1 Chron. xxix. 20.—7bya? 72D, They 
shall look upward, does not mean 
turning to God in the exercise of 
confidence, but presenting a sullen 
aspect—the genuine expression of an 
unsubdued and desperate spirit.—To 
whatever quarter the unbelieving Jews 
might turn, no indication of deliver- 
ance appeared. ΤῚΣ AyD, usually ren- 
dered darkness of distress; but since 
FAY corresponds in position to M772 in 
the following clause, just as 772% does 
to Mex, it seems requisite to invest it 
with the same participial power, and 
render the words thus: covered, or 
overwhelmed with trouble. The regular 
participial form in Hophal is 729, as 
occurring ver. 23, where it agrees with 
psy, For ΠῚ} 75x, comp. Jer. xxiii. 
12. 


CHAP. ὙΠ11.] 


ISATAH. 


79 


CHAPTER VIII. 23.—IX. 6. 


Having depicted the wretched condition to which the Jews would be reduced 
by the Assyrians, the prophet again anticipates the appearance of Immanuel, 
by graphically describing the principal scene of his public ministry, 23; 
congratulates the Church on the deliverance which he was to effect, in terms 
borrowed from that which had been experienced from the intervening 
captivity, and the destruction of Babylon, ix. 1—5; and then introduces, in 
the most animated strains, a description of Messiah’s character, and the 


happy nature of his reign, 5, 6. 


23 Bur darkness shall not remain, where once was distress : 
As formerly he rendered contemptible 
The land of Zebulon, and the land of Naphtali ; 
So he shall afterwards confer honour upon them— 


23. In this verse there is a marked 
transition from the period of affliction 
to the joyful times of the Messiah, now 
to be described. In the first clause 
the subst. verb is twice understood ; 
first in the future tense, with the 
superadded idea of continuance; and 
then in the preterite. Such ellipses 
are common.—» is adversative ; TOx>, 
and πῆ, connect with 28 in the pre- 
ceding verse. The 7 in 7278 is neither 
local, nor a less frequent termination 
of γι, but simply paragogic, as Job 
xxxiv. 13, xxxvii. 12, and frequently 
in poetry. nya stands for nya W232; 
and nya 72 would have been supplied 
before }77N7, but for the }, which, as 
the logical copula, is there equivalent 
to it—To make ny? the nomin. to the 
verbs ὙΠ and 337, and render, as 
Michaelis, Rosenmiller, and Hengsten- 
berg do, with the approbation of 


Gesenius, As the former time brought, ' 


&c., into contempt, so shall futurity 
honour, &c., is unwarranted by usage. 
Day or night is, indeed, freq. employed 
as an active subject, but not ny simply, 
_ either in Heb. or in any of the dialects. 
The verbs may be regarded as imper- 
' sonal, and rendered passively ; or ΠῚ 
" may be understood, which seems pre- 
ferable, as the writers of Scripture 
always resolve events into the will or 


operations of God.—The regions occu- 
pied by the tribes of Zebulon and 
Naphtali were, with the exception of 
the land of Asher, the most northerly 
parts of Canaan, and consequently the 
most distant from Jerusalem. Zebulon 
stretched across from the Mediterra- 
nean Sea at Mount Carmel to the sea 
of Tiberias; and Naphtali, from the 
northern boundary of Zebulon, be- 
tween that Sea and Lebanon.—od™1 777, 
the tract of or about the sea. OT com- 
monly signifies κατ᾽ ἐξόχην the Medi- 
terranean; but it is also used of the 
Red Sea, chap. x. 26, the Dead Sea, 
chap. xvi. 8, and here obviously of the 
sea of Tiberias, called ™:3°0, the sea of 
Cinnereth, Num. xxxiv. 11,—j7P7 ὭΣ, 
τὸ πέραν τοῦ “lopdavov, Perea, the 
country beyond Jordan; more espe- 
cially that on the east, and to the 
north of the above-mentioned sea. 
The attempts of Grotius, Vitringa, 
and Hengstenberg, to interpret the 
phrase of a cis-Jordanic region, are 
unsuccessful, though it cannot be 
denied, that in passages such as Josh. 
ix. 1, it must signify the west side.— 
oad 3, the circle or circuit of the 
nutions, from 553, to roll, roll round, be 
round, circular, &c.: so called from its 
geographical figure, and its proximity 
to the Pheenician and other heathen 


80 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. IX. 


The tract by the sea, the region beyond Jordan, 


Galilee of the nations. 


CHAPTER IX. 


1 The people that walked in darkness, 


Behold a great light ; 


Upon the inhabitants of the land of death-shade 


The light shineth. 
2 Thou enlargest the nation, 


regions, and partly, perhaps, from the 
circumstance that twenty small cities 
within its limits were inhabited, for 
the most part, by Gentiles. Strabo 
mentions Phenicians, Syrians, and Ara- 
bians, as dwelling here; and Josephus 
adds Greeks. Comp. 1 Kings ix. 11; 
Josh. xx. 7, xxi. 32; and see Bloomfield, 
on Matt. iv. 15, 16, where, with 
scarcely any variation, this and the 
following verse are quoted in applica- 
tion to our Lord’s ministry in those 
parts. In the N. T., Galilee, ἡ Γαλιλαία, 
includes all the regions here geogra- 
phically described, except Perea. 

The points of contrast in this pas- 
sage, are the contemptuous light in 
which the inhabitants of that part of 
the Holy Land had been regarded, on 
account of their greater intercourse 
with pagans, and the ignorance and 
deterioration in a religious point of 
view which resulted from it, Matt. 
xxvi. 69; John i. 46, vii. 52; and the 
high honour conferred upon them by 
our Saviour’s commencing his minis- 
try among them, and making their 
country the scene of the most illus- 
trious displays of his Messiahship. 
Comp. for the sentiment, Mic. v. 2,(Heb. 
1,)and for the expectation of the earlier 
Rabbins, the book Zohar, part i. fol. 
119. Amst. 527 ΠΡῚΝ NWO NID “IM, 
Messiah the King shall be revealed in the 
land of Galilee. The transition was 
easy from a description of temporal to 
that of spiritual degradation and 
misery; especially as the image of 
darkness, which the prophet had just 
been employing, is in Scripture fre- 
quently used of both. That he should 
‘precisely have selected Zebulon and 


Naphtali on this occasion, may be ac- 
counted for, on the ground that these 
tribes were the first that suffered 
from the invasion of the Assyrians, 
2 Kings xv. 29. 


Cuapter 1X.—1. 029, that walked ; 
727 signifies tropically, fo live, or have 
one’s conversation. Comp. Eph. i. 2; 
1 John i. 6.—*s, Light, the Messiah as 
the Sun of righteousness. Mal. iv. 2; 
Is. xlix. 6; τὸ φῶς, τὸ φῶς τὸ ἀληθινὸν, 
John i. 5, 9, τὸ φῶς τοῦ κόσμου, Vili. 12, 
the author not only of true knowledge, 
but of the true and permanent happi- 
ness connected with it.—ny22z, Geier, 
De Dieu, Michaelis and some others, 
take to be simply a derivative from 


nos, Arab. 


but it seems preferable, with the 
ancient versions, to regard it as com- 
pounded of 58, @ shadow, and nyo, 
death, like MYNEN, the court of death, 
Gen. x. 26, nwo, strength of death, 2 
Sam. xxiii. 31. It is employed to 
denote the densest gloom, or the most 
awful darkness—ideas which are very 
naturally associated with that of 
death, independently of those which 
the region of sepulchral cells might 
suggest. See Job iii. 4, 5, x. 21, 22; 
Ps. xxiii. 4. Hitzig thinks there may 
have been some place so called, in the 
valley Achor, Hos. ii. 15 (Heb. 17) ; 
but this is mere conjecture. 

2. Instead of the Chethib δ, of, 
which has the support of Aquila, 
Theod., Symm., the Vulg., and in 
all probability the LXX. originally: 
the ov κατήγαγες having easily been 
changed into ὁ κατήγαγες ; see Middel- 


2, to be dark, shady, &e.; 


— 


CHAP. IX.]| 


ISATAH. 


Whose joy thou didst not increase ; 
They rejoice before thee as with the joy of harvest, 
As men rejoice when dividing the spoil. 


3 For the yoke of their burden, 


And the staff of their shoulder, 


The rod of their oppressor, 


Thou hast broken, as in the day of Midian. 
4 For every sandal of the sandalled in battle, 

And the garment rolled in blood, 

Shall be burned ; it shall be food for the fire. 


dorpf’s Codex Syriaco-Hexap. p. 474; 
, to it, the Keri, is found in thirteen 
MSS., was originally in four more, and 
perhaps in three, and is the reading 
followed in the Syr., the Targ., and 
Saadias. The word is wanting alto- 
gether in three MSS. Both readings 
being pronounced alike may have 
occasioned the difference; but the 
Chethib being the more difficult of 
the two, and being so respectably 
supported, is entitled to the preference. 
Considering ™72vT as standing for 
int, and rendering 4727 in the past 
indefinite time, the whole may conyve- 
niently be translated, Thou hast en- 
larged the nation; its, or rather, whose 
joy thou didst not increase: (but now) 
they rejoice, &c.; reflecting on the joy- 
less period which immediately pre- 
ceded the coming of the Messiah, and 
contrasting it with that here predicted. 
There is properly a /ifotes in the lan- 
guage: the meaning being, whose joy 
thou didst take away—The 3 in ὙΞΒΞ 
Lowth rejects, on the ground of the 
preceding noun being in construction ; 
but this form frequently occurs. See 
2 Sam. i. 21; Ps. ii. 12, ix. 10; Isaiah 
v. 11, xxi. 138.—In 22», before thee, 7 
is understood, as it likewise is in the 
second person of the verbs. 

3. The subject to which the prono- 
minal affixes belong is "30, the nation 
mentioned in the preceding verse. 
Yad is the burden laid upon it, and 722 
3020, the rod applied to its shoulder or 
back, in the way of punishment. The 
Dagesh in 3 is euphonic.—p72 DY, ¢he 
day of Midian, comp. chap. x. 26; a 
mode of speech by which the Orientals 
express a battle fought at any place. 


φ 


Thus the Arab. yy 65» prelium Bed- 


rense 3 | gis eo» Dies prelii 
Thaghlebitarum. Freytag. The refer- 
ence is to Judges vii. 19—23; and the 
comparison is the more apt, as the 
victory there described took place in 
the regions specified at the beginning 
of the present chapter. The grand 
point of comparison, however, consists 
in thedeliverance having beeneffected, 
not by human means, but by the im- 
mediate interposition of Divine power. 


.Such was the nature of the redemp- 


tion to be effected by Immanuel. 
The language of the verse is figurative, 
and applies to the victory of the 
Messiah over Satan, and the rescue of 
his people from spiritual oppression. 
See Rosenmiller and Hengstenberg, 
in loc. 

4. This verse describes the sure in- 
dications of a state of lasting peace, 
in language borrowed from an ancient 
custom of burning implements of war 
that had been taken from the enemy. 
This custom is distinctly recognised, 
Ps. xlvi. 9 ; Micah v. 10; Ezek. xxxix. 
8—10 ; in the last of which passages 
the image is beautifully amplified. By 
PRO is meant the military shoe or sandal, 
strongly shod with nails or spikes, 
and reaching about mid-leg. It thus 
differed from the greave, which came 


vy 
higher up. Comp. aaj, Be ye shod, 
in the Peshito, Eph. vi.15 ; the Chald. 


xvD, and the Eth. AULA'S, shoe.— 


JNO is the participle, formed from the 
Same noun. wv} signifies baffle, from 


82 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP.. IX. 


5 For to us a Child is born, to us a Son is given; 
And the government shall be upon his shoulder ; 


And his name shall be called, 


WoNDERFUL, COUNSELLOR, 


Micutry Gop, Farner or Erernity, Prince or PEACE. 
6 Of the increase of his government and its peace, there shall be 


no end, 


the noise and tumult connected with it; 
and nv is appropriated to denote 
the sagum or cloak worn by soldiers in 
war. Both it, however, and the san- 
dal are here employed synecdochically 
for all kinds of military accoutrements. 
The ) in 77 marks the apodosis. 
The interpretation here given of }ixo, 
&c. was first suggested by Joseph 
Kimchi, and is now generally ap- 
proved. 

5, 6. Of the exclusive application of 
this prophecy to the Messiah, no doubt 
was entertained by the earlier Rabbins. 
The Targum renders it: }2 720 "pM 
nrpuin Nysme?) DP NID NTN Tey HO DTP, 
“ara NwY wD NOR, “And his name 
was called of old, Wonderful, Counsel, 
the Mighty God, He who continueth for 
ever, The Messiah, in whose days peace 
shall be multiplied upon us.” Similar 
applications are made in the Bere- 
shith Rabba on Gen. xli. 44, in the 
Echa Rabbitha on Lamentations ; and 
Ben Sira includes, “Wonderful, Coun- 
sellor, Mighty God, and Prince of 
Peace,” in his list of the eight names 
of the Messiah. The modern foreign 
writers who have adopted or defended 
this interpretation, are Cube, Dathe, 
Michaelis, Doderlein, Koppe, Plischke, 
Kuinoel, Herder, Duchman, V. D. Palm, 
Rosenmiiller, Umbreit, and Hengsten- 
berg. On the other hand, Hezel, 
Hensler, Paulus, Hendewerk, and even 
Jahn, after Kimchi, Jarchi, Abenezra, 
and Grotius, refer the passage to 
Hezekiah ; which interpretation Gese- 
nius attempts to sustain in his Com- 
ment., though he is obliged to confess, 
that “it may still be considered Mes- 
sianic, inasmuch as the description is 
ideal, and may or may not be applied 
to any real subject ;” and in his Lex. 
Man. he renders 8%, 2. Coner. admira- 
bilis, evimius, (de rege Messize,) Is. ix. 6. 
Hitzig views the passage as an ex- 
aggerated description of some future 
king of the house of David; which, 


in the main, is the opinion adopted 
by Bauer, Eichhorn, and Vogel. 

The assertion of Gesenius, that the 
words are not applied to our Lord in 
the N. T. (an objection which we 
should not have expected from such 
a quarter) is contrary to fact; for 
though they are not expressly or ver- 
bally quoted, it is evident the angel 
Gabriel thus applies them in his an- 
nunciation to Mary, Luke i. 32, 33. 
First, her child was to be “ the Son of 
the Highest,” in reference to that part 
of the prophecy, “To us ὦ Son is 
given.” Secondly, he was to be “great,” 
which the assemblage of exalted and 
distinguished names in the prediction 
sufficiently indicates. Thirdly, he was 
to have given to him “the throne of . 
his father David,’ which corresponds 
to “his government upon the throne 
of David” in the prophecy ; and his 
“reigning over the house of Jacob,’ 
to his being “over the kingdom of 
David” in the following clause. 
Fourthly, the words, “Of his king- 
dom there shall be no end,” are almost 
a literal quotation of the words, “ Of 
the increase of his government— 
there shall be no end.” 

That neither Hezekiah, norany other 
temporal king of the Jews after his 
time, can be possibly intended, appears 
from the fact, that none of them ever 
did or could exert a beneficial influence © 
over Galilee, since it lay entirely be- | 
yond their jurisdiction ; and also from 
the peculiar terms of the description, 
which admit of no appropriate inter- 
pretation except they be applied toa 
Divine Person. ‘ Nobis,” says Rosen- 
miiller, “omnino haud est credibile, 
vatem ullum Hebreum de solito aliquo 
sue gentis rege spes adeo magnificas, 
quales hic expressas legimus, concipere 
potuisse.” Schol. Edit. 1835. And 
Schroeder in MS.: “de solo Messi 
hune locum accipiendum esse, ex in- 
signibus titulis atque divinis honori- 


CHAP. IX.] 


ISAIAH. 


83 


Upon the throne of David, and over his kingdom ; 
To establish it, and strengthen it, with justice and equity, 


bus, qui ipsi dantur tam evidens est, 
ut in dubium vocari non _possit.” 
Still stronger is the language of Chry- 
sostom, tom. i. p. 560: ὅτι δὲ περὶ dv- 
θρώπου, οὐκ ἄν τις εἴποι τοῦτο ψιλοῦ, 
εὔδηλον, καὶ τοῖς σφόδρα φιλονικεῖν 
ἐθέλουσι: θεὸς γὰρ ἰσχυρὸς οὐδεὶς ἀν- 
θρώπων ἐλέχθη ἀπὸ τοῦ αἰῶνος, οὐδὲ 
ἄρχων εἰρήνης τοιαύτης" τῆς γὰρ εἰρήνης 
αὐτοῦ, φῆσιν, οὐκ ἔστιν ὅριον. 
ἈΠ) 72 wT Wwe. The concinnity 
and emphasis of these words evince 
the high state of exultation to which 
the mind of the prophet was raised, 
when he delivered them. The verbs 
are put in the preterite, to indicate 
the certainty of the event which they 
predict. ὋΣ is used per κοίνωσιν.--- 
jody MIwAT IA. The former of these 
nouns is derived from 7, an obsolete 
verb, equivalent to WY and WW, like 
_ ΠΌΤ. from 9); and signifies absolute 
vule, dominion, empire. It occurs 
only here and ver. 6. The resting of 
this empire upon the shoulder of the 
prince, indicates the weight of public 
affairs which he would have to sustain. 
Comp. Plin. Panegyr. ὁ. 10; Cicero, 
Orat. pro Flacco, § 95. For the cus- 
tom of placing the badge of office on 
the shoulder, see xxii. 22. 

xq? is to be taken impersonally, but 
is best rendered passively. The later 
Jews, in order to get rid of the Chris- 
tian interpretation of the verse, main- 
tain that all the names, as far as 
ἼΣΩΝ, form the nominative, and that 
Οὐχ Ww alone is the object to the verb; 

but such an accumulation of names 
forming a nominative is without ex- 
ample, and in Hebrew usage, the 
name given uniformly follows im- 
mediately after 2¥, and not that of 
the person who gives it.—N, lit. ὦ 
wonder, miracle, from 2, to separate, 
distinguish by some remarkable quali- 
ties ; that which, from its not com- 
ing within the compass of natural 
events, is the cause of wonder and ad- 
miration. The abstract is used for the 
concrete: Wonderful, worthy of ad- 
miration. Thus Aquila, θαυμαστός ; 


[2 » 
Symm., παραδοξασμός; the Syr. | 0002, 


admiratio; Jerome, admirabilis. ty 
825, effecting miracles, is one of the 
peculiar characteristics of Jehovah, 
Exod. xv. 11; and nix: the Niphal 
part. is freq. used of the miracles that 
were wrought in behalf of the He- 
brews. As the Uncreated Angel, the 
same glorious person here predicted, 
appropriates the title to himself, Jud. 
xiii. 18, where, though the Keri reads 
%e, the Chethib is ‘B.—yyY, Coun- 
sellor; Aquila, σύμβουλος; Symm. 
βουλευτικός ; Theod. βουλεύων. Some 
wouid join this and the preceding title 
together, and render, Wonderful Coun- 
sellor, on the specious ground, that all 
the other titles are in pairs; but what- 
ever uniformity in point of construc- 
tion might thus be introduced into 
the passage, it is completely at vari- 
ance with Hebrew construction. To 
admit of this rendering, the form 
must be 7EY 82, and not yyy x. For 
the import of this title, comp. chap. 
xa. 9. John. ds: Matt. τὶ 27) ine 
111. 18.—)32 Ox, The Mighty God. The 
occurrence of these words in conjunc- 
tion, chap. x. 21, in application to 
Jehovah as revealed in the person of 
the Messiah, irrefragably proves that 
they are so to be combined in the pre- 
sent instance ; as also, that 98 is to be 
taken in its usual acceptation, as one 
of the Divine names, and not in that 
of Hero, which Gesenius assigns to it. 
Hitzig defends the rendering, starher 
Gott, “Mighty God ;” and thus the 
Targ. Syr., Jerome, Ignat. in Epist.ad 
Antioch., Tren. adv. Heres. lib. iv. 
cap. 66; Euseb. in Demon. Evang. 
libb. vii. and ix.; Clemens, Peedag. lib. 
i.; Severian. in Combes. Auctar. Non. 
P.P.tom.i. Comp. Deut. x. 17; Jer. 
xxxii. 18. 58 never occurs as an ad- 
jective. Theodoret, animadverting 
upon the translation of Aquila, ἰσχυ- 
pos δυνατός, observes: κεῖται δὲ παρὰ 
τὸ Ἕβρ. ἢλ γεββώρ᾽ τὸ δὲ HA, θεός ; 
“ But in the Hebrew it is Μὲ gibbor: 
now Hi signifies God.” The combina- 
tion, aa by γον, the Consulter of the 
Mighty God, as Grotius renders it ; or 
the Counsellor of God, Mighty, proposed 
by Dr. L. Carpenter; no Hebrew 


84 


Henceforth and for ever :-- 


scholar can, for a moment, admit.— 
wos, lit. the Father of perpetuity, 
eternity, from the root 1, fo advance, 
go forward, endure, Gesenius translates, 
pater sempiternus, which agrees with 
our common version, and most modern 
translations, and ascribes the attri- 
bute of eternity to the Messiah. Yet, 
as TY is specially used to denote future 
duration, the LXX. seem to have hit 
the true meaning when they render, 
as in the Ald. and Complut. editions : 
Πατὴρ τοῦ μέλλοντος αἰῶνος, Father of 
the future age; Only the age is not to 
be restricted to the present dispensa- 
tion, but is to be extended to the state 
of eternal blessedness after death. 
ax signifies not only father, but also 
author, provider, benefactor, Gen. iv. 21 ; 
Job xxix. 16; Ps. Ixvili. 6; and 
especially, Is. xxii. 21, and Gen. xlv. 
8, where Joseph is said to have been 
made @ father to Pharaoh,—not his 
Vizier or prime minister as Gesenius 
explains it, but ἃ provider, with special 
reference to the famine. Comp. also 
2 Cor.i.3; Jamesi.17. The Turkish, 


ELL, Atabeh, to which the same 


author refers in illustration, is not ap- 
plied to the Vizier in the sense of 
Sather of the prince, but is simply a 
title of respect, Dominus Pater, and is 
given both to ministers and to the 
prince himself. The corresponding 


Arabic, yl, is in use among the 


Diyabi Bedoweens of Oman. Well- 
sted, in his travels among them, men- 
tions that each of the seven divisions 
of that peculiar people is governed 
by a chief called Ad, who exercises 
what may be termed a patriarchal 
authority over them. This office is 
filled by individuals whose superior 
Sagacity, experience, and courage, en- 
title them to the distinction. The 
Messiah may appropriately be styled, 
The father of the future eternal state, in- 
asmuch as he is the author and 
bestower of its blessings ; and in this 
point of view, W728 exactly corres- 
ponds to αἴτιος σωτηρίας αἰωνίου, Heb. 
v. 9. The rendering, Futher of prey, 
proposed by Abarbanel, and adopted 
by Lgen and Hitzig, is quite out of 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. IX. 


place here ; though it cannot be de- 
nied, that Ἣν is also used to denote 
prey. Dwr, Zhe Prince of Peace 
answers to 1%, Shiloh, The Pacificator, 
Gen. xlix. 10; οὐ» Zhe Peace, Micah 
v. 4. Comp. Eph. ii. 14, 17: Col. i. 
20. 

The state of the LXX. text in this 
place is so unsettled, that little use 
can be made of it for the purpose of 
throwing light upon the terms em- 
ployed. See Stroth’s Beytrige zur 
Kritik der LXX. in Eichhorn’s Reper- 
torium, part 111. p.252. It is exhibited 
at greater length in the Alex. and 
Ald. copies, than in that of the Vat. ; 
but all three have the remarkable 
rendering, μεγάλης βουλῆς ἄγγελος, The 
Angel of the great Counsel, which they 
are supposed to have found in the 
words > yy? X%—taking ἢ in the ac- 
ceptation of azgel, which they have 
certainly done Job xx. 15. Whether 
they had in view 7 32x92, The Angel of 
Jehovah, of celebrated occurrence, can- 
not be determined. 

73709 (7372). That Christian editors 
of the Hebrew Bible should still con- 
form to the Masoretic absurdity of 
exhibiting a final Mem at the begin- 
ning of a word, is passing strange ; as 
it must likewise be considered, that 
any interpreters should imitate the 
Rabbins in attempting to find mys- 
teries in it. The only edition in 
which I have seen it corrected is that 
of Hahn, Lips. 1834, 12mo., which 
contains other emendations of a simi- 
lar kind. There is no ground for sup- 
posing that the text originally read 
mm 02, the former of these words 
standing for 07?—though this division 
is actually found in two or three MSS. 
In what sense the Messiah occupies 
the throne of David, see Dan. ii. 44 ; 
vii. 14, 27; Luke 1. 31—33; Acts ii, 
34—36 ; Rom. xiv.9; 1 Cor. xv. 24— 
28; Heb. xii. 27, 28; and those pas- 
sages of the N.T. in which the dis- 
pensation of the Messiah is designated 
7 βασιλεία τοῦ θεοῦ, τῶν οὐρανῶν, το. 
His reign is not earthly and temporal, 
but spiritual and eternal.—This illus- 
trious prophecy beautifully concludes 
with the words, ΓΝ Tim ΠΡ} 
ΠΤ ΤΟΣ, with respect to which itisonly 


=r 


ISAIAH. 
The zeal of Jehovah of Hosts shall effect this. 


CHAP, IX.] 85 


necessary to remark, that 7p, zeal, is evinced by vigilant attention and in- 
here used in the acceptation of strong defatigable effort in regard to it, 
affection, or ardent love for an object, Song vili. 6; Zech, viii. 2. 


CHAPTER IX. 7—X. 4. 


This section is clearly distinguishable from those which precede and follow it, 
by the peculiar features of the composition, and the subject-matter which 
it contains, The 7th verse forms the title or introduction: then follow 
four regular stanzas, to each of which is added a distich, consisting of 
a refrain, or repetition of the same words. The prophecy is directed against 
the kingdom or people of Israel, and threatens them with Divine judgments 
in punishment of their pride, 7—12; their obstinate rebellion against the 
Lord, 13—16 ; their flagrant wickedness, 17—20 ; and their perversion of 


justice, x, 1—4, 


7 JEHOVAH sent a word against Jacob, 
And it came down against Israel ; 
8 And all the people shall know it— 
Ephraim and the inhabitants of Samaria— 
Who say in pride and arrogance of heart : 
9 The bricks have fallen, but we will build with hewn stones ; 
The sycamores are cut down, but we will substitute cedars. 


7. Asynonymous parallelism. For 
‘yx, thirty-three of Kennicott’s MSS. 
and three of the earliest printed edi- 
tions, read T17,—3, fo come down, in the 
sense in which %3 52 is used Dan. iv. 28, 


and ων 31, in the Koran, to in- 


dicate the communication of oracular 
matter, or revelations from heaven. 
Jacob and Israel are identical, designat- 
ing the kingdom of the ten tribes. 

8. Ὁ signifies here ¢o feel, know from 
suffering experimentally, as Num. xiv. 
34; ‘nsanny OMYT), Ye shall know, 1. e. 
feel my opposition, the hostility which 
you have provoked ; very improperly 
rendered in the common version, 
“My breach of promise.” See also 
Job xxi. 19; Hos. ix. 7. “Ephraim 
and the inhabitants of Samaria” is 
-added by way of explanation to 59 oya, 


to exclude the idea of Judah from 
being involved in the threatening. The 
Yin 18%) is emphatic: “ and especially 
the inhabitants of the metropolis.” 

9. The 0°22) were bricks made of a 
white, or chalky clay, (122, to be white,) 
and dried in the sun, but not burnt. 
To give them coherence they were 
mixed with straw, Exod. v. 7, but 
they possessed little durability. Such 
bricks were in common use, as they 
are at this day, all over the East. 
When edifices of large dimensions 
were to be built, the bricks were 
burnt, Gen. xi. 3.—™2 for ™2 228, 
hewn stones, from ™3 to cut, form by hew- 
ing. The term is specially used of 
large stones made square by hewing, 
1 Kings v. 31.—op7d, LXX. συκάμι- 
vous, sycamores, a kind of fig-tree, 
resembling in its leaves and fruit the 


L 


80 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. IX. 


10 Therefore Jehovah will raise up the hostile bands of Rezin 


against them, 


And will equip their enemies ; 


11 Syria on the east, and the Philistines on the west ; 
And they shall devour Israel with open mouth. 
For all this his anger is not turned away, 
But his hand is stretched out still. 
12 For the people have not returned to him who smote them ; 
And Jehovah of Hosts they have not sought. 
13 Therefore Jehovah will cut off from Israel, 
The head and the tail, the branch and the rush, 


mulberry-tree, and called by Pliny 
jicus Aigyptia, from its being frequent 
in that country. It also abounded, 
and still abounds in the level parts of 
Palestine. It is durable, but slender, 
and coarse in the grain, and is used by 
the inhabitants for ordinary purposes. 
i Kings x. 27; 1 Chron. xxvii. 28); 
Amos vii. 14.—o"ny, cedars. See note 
on chap. ii. 13. While the sycamore 
was of little worth, the cedar was 
held in the highest estimation, and is 
the most celebrated of all the trees 
mentioned in Scripture. The impeni- 
tent Ephraimites treat with contempt 
the results of Tiglath-pileser’s inva- 
sion, and boast that they will speedily 
place their affairs in a far more pro- 
sperous condition than before. 

10, 11. 23%, used here instead of 
oy, (see Micah v. 4;) only the idea 
of superiority in prowess is expressed 
by the former term. Instead of "8 
TS), the enemies of Rezin, thirteen MSS., 
originally seventeen more, now three, 
and the Keri of one of De Rossi’s, 
read Y2) ‘Ww, the princes of Rezin; 
whichisadopted by Houbigant, Lowth, 
Déderlein, Dathe, and Hensler. Mi- 
chaelis, following the LXX., rods ἐπα- 
νισταμένους ἐπὶ ὄρος Σιὼν, conjectures 
72% to have been the original reading, 
and renders, die Widersacher des Berges 
Zion, “the adversaries of Mount Zion,” 
but he is quite uncertain respecting 
the application of the words. There 
is, however, no real difficulty in the 
common reading, which is corrobo- 
rated by ΣΝ in the second member of 
the parallelism. By the enemies of 
Rezin the Assyrians are meant, by 


‘engage 


whom, under Tiglath-Pileser, Rezin 
was slain, his capital taken, and the 
population and that of a portion of 
Israel carried away into Media. These 
were to come a second time against 
Israel; and to aggravate the evil, both 
the Arameans and the Philistines 
would, under the conqueror, rush into 
the country, and pillage it at pleasure. 
This took place when Shalmaneser 
reduced the kingdom of Israel to an 
Assyrian province, about the year B.c. 
730 or 720.—J20, the Pilpel of 729, 
to interweave, fence, cover, or furnish with 
armour, With an original reference to 
the large shields, which often consisted 
of osiers intertwined, and covered with 


bull’s hide, Comp. the Arab. sls, 
spinis munivit parietem ; ἀκ, ὦ, δρίμα; 


hence arma eorumve acumen.—%X, 
freq. used of the consumption effected 
by war; hence 727%, war, from the 
synonymous root 01), fo eat, devour,— 
D0, the Niphal of which signifies to 
in battle. Comp. πολέμοιο 
μέγα στόμα. Iliad. x. 8. 

12. 2 is more commonly followed 
by > and ὅν, but it is also in other 
passages construed with 7¥, chap. xix. 
22; Amos iv. 6. In 17397 the refer- 
ence is to Jehovah as the inflicter of 
the punishment. 

13. περ, the palm-branch; from its 
curved, hand-like shape; but employed 
here on account of its elevated position 
on the tree, which is itself one of the 
most beautiful in the vegetable king- 
dom.—jiaxx, the reed or rush, whieh 
grows in low marshy tracts, and 


° 


CHAP. IX.] 


In a single day. 


ISAIAH. 


87 


14 The elder, even the honourable, he is the head ; 
And the prophet, the teacher of falsehood, he is the tail. 
15 For the leaders of this people cause them to err ; 
And those who are led by them are destroyed. 
16 Wherefore the Lord shall not rejoice over their young men, 
Nor will he pity their orphans and widows ; 
For every one of them is profane and wicked, 
And every mouth speaketh folly. 
For all this his anger is not turned away, 
But his hand is stretched out still: 
17 For wickedness burneth like fire, 


attains to the height of eight or ten 
feet. The different terms here em- 
ployed are appropriate images of 
persons in high and inferior stations 
of life. Thus the LXX. μέγαν καὶ 
μικρόν. Eleven MSS., and originally 
three more, prefix 3 to OY, as chap. x. 
17, where, likewise, the phrase denotes 
quickly, within the shortest period. 

14. This verse Koppe, Cube, Eich- 
horn, Gesenius, and Hitzig, maintain 
to be a gloss; principally on the 
ground, that the contrast so strikingly 
made in the preceding verse is not 
kept up in the exegesis here given. 
But it is obvious from ver. 15, that it 
was specially the design of Isaiah to 
degrade and expose the false prophets, 
which he could not have done more 
effectually than by comparing them 
to the tail; thus assigning to them 
the most contemptible position in 
society. The verse is, therefore, quite 
in its place, as Hendewerk has ably 
shewn. Comp. for the other terms, 
chap. iii. 2, 3. 

15. Comp. chap. iii. 12. By oqvx0 
are meant the lying teachers men- 
tioned in the preceding verse.— 23, in 
Kal, to swallow, devour eagerly; in Piel, 
to destroy, exterminate. 

16. onm3, the delectus, young, choice 
warriors, from 3, fo choose, select the 
best of any thing. Comp. chap. xxxi. 
8, Jer. xviii. 21; and Ps. cx. 3, where 
nny, youth, likewise signifies youthful 
warriors.—*, on impious, Or profane 


person; Syr. 3.1.» one who is morally 
impure, ὦ heathen; Eth. f€4qQ.: a 


heretic. The word has generally been 
rendered fypocrite, but apparently 
without foundation in the Hebrew, or 
any other of the dialects. It denotes 
an atrocious, unprincipled character, 
one who is uninfluenced by regard 
either to God or man. See Job viii. 
13, xiii. 16, xvii. 8.—YY2, see chap. 1. 4. 

17. AY) signifies in this place, not 
wickedness in general, but idolatry, 
the fruitful parent of all manner of 
evil. Comp. Zech. v. 8: Tyt 7 NN, 
This is wickedness, i.e. idolatry, which 
was removed from the land of Israel 
at the captivity, and set down in 
Babylon, its own appropriate place, 
vers. 9—11. Its prevalence is com- 
pared to a raging fire, which spreads 
devastation wherever it comes, espe- 
cially in a forest; and those who in- 
dulge in it are compared to briers and 
thorns, which are easily ignited and 
speedily consumed. This image is 
frequently used in the Hebrew Scrip- 
tures. See Ps. lviii. 10, cxviii. 12; 
Isa. x. 16, 17, xxxiii. 12; Micah vii. 
4; Nah. i. 10.--᾿ὴῖν Mx WANN, And 
they roll upward in a column of smoke. 
The verb. 728 is a ἅπαξ λεγ., but is 
obviously related to pix, whirling dust ; 


Arab. (jl, JE%, Arab. EAS), to turns 


in Hith. fo turn oneself about; and 
expresses the winding or revolving 
action of a body of smoke rising into 
the air. Some compare the Arab. 


SI, carnosus fuit, and the Syr. 


ov 
las} > gallus gallinaceus, superbo gradu 


88 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. X. 


It consumeth the thorns and briers ; 
And it kindleth the thickets of the forest, 
And they roll upward—a column of smoke. 


18 


By the wrath of Jehovah of Hosts the land is burned up, 


And the people are as food for the fire ; 
They have no pity for each other. 


19 


And one cutteth down on the right, yet starveth ; 


And eateth on the left, but is not satisfied ; 
They each devour the flesh of his arm: 


20 


Manasseh, Ephraim, and Ephraim, Manasseh ; 


And these together are against Judah! 
For all this his anger is not turned away, 
But his hand is stretched out still. 


CHAPTER X. 


1 Wo to the enactors of iniquitous statutes, 


incedens, and, after Castel., render the 
word superbient, fastuose se gerent— 
referring the comparison to the szell- 
iny of the volumes of smoke; but the 
former etymology is preferable, and 


has the support of the Syr. casogsda : 
and the Vulg. convolvetur. ΤΌΝΔ is used 
adverbially to denote the proud direc- 
tion of the smoke as thus rolling itself 
upwards. Hendewerk thinks there 
is purposely an omission of the Cuph 
veritatis before this substantive. 

18. The flames are now described 
as extending from the forest to the 
whole country ; only instead of being 
further represented as resulting from 
wickedness, the conflagration is re- 
solved into the anger of God as the 
avenger of sin. The idea of civil dis- 
cord and mutual destruction was also 
naturally suggested by that of fire, 
which consumes on every hand.—ony 
occurs only here, but appears from 
the connexion, and from its affinity 


with the Arab. εἰς » to be darkened, 


ἃς, estus ingens et suffocans, suffocating 


heat, to have the signification of durn- 
ing, burning up, burning so as to leave 
the ground completely black ; LXX. 


συγκέκαυται; Alex, συγκαυθήσεται ; 


Targ. m2, adusta est. YX being of 
common gender, occasions no diffi- 
culty in construing it with the mas, 
of the verb. 


19. 12, Arab. =, ¢o hill, cut up, 


dissect, prepare for food. Secker’s con- 
jecture, which Lowth adopts, that we 
are to read 1X, his companion, instead 
of Dt, his arm, appears, at first sight, 
to derive support from the parallel 
passage, Jer. xix. 9; but as yim is 
used tropically to denote strength, aid, 
&c., there is no occasion to alter the 
text. The word is here used, like the 


Arab, jae ; brachium, adjutor, socius, 


one who employs his arm in behalf of 
another, a helper, friend, ὅθ. Comp. 
Ps. Ixxxiii. 9; Is. xxxiii,2; Jer. xvii. 
5. The following verse clearly shews 
that this is the meaning. It was 
natural for those who were related to 
each other, to render mutual assist- 
ance ; but in civil broils, every tie of 
the kind is disregarded, and those 
who are most closely connected often 
become the greatest foes. 

20. An epexegesis of the preced- 
ing, in which the figurative language 
is literally explained, 


CHAPTER X.—1, Before ov, subaud. 
WR, 


ὃ 


CHAP. Χ.] 


ISAIAH. 


89 


And the writers who register evil : 


To turn away the poor from judgment, 


And deprive of their right the afflicted of my people ; 
That the widows may be their prey, 
And that they may plunder the orphans. 

3 And what will ye do in the day of visitation, 
And of desolation which cometh from afar ? 
To whom will ye flee for help ? 

And where will ye leave your nobility ? 

4 Except they crouch among the prisoners, 
They shall fall among the slain. 

For all this his anger is not turned away, 
But his hand is stretched out still. 


2. pr. eT differs in signification, 
as in form, from bb022 737, and 77 
ved. The latter phrases signify to 
pervert justice, to give a wrong ver- 
dict ; the former means (/o turn away 
@ cause, 80 as to prevent its being 
brought to trial—%3 conveys the 
idea of taking away by fraud and 
violence.—At the close of the verse, 
the verb assumes the finite form. 

3. DY, day, is understood as repeated 
before 781M; and 72x is to be supplied 
before pv; which term refers to 
the Assyrians, who, though distant, 
are spoken of as already on their 
march.—72. LXX. ἐπισκοπή, in this 
and several other passages, but also 
ἐπίσκεψις, ἐκδίκησις. The root signi- 
fies, in such connexion, to come to 
any one in a hostile sense, to visit so 
as to punish. Comp. Job xxxi. 14; 
Jer, xxiii. 12; and the Greek, 1 Pet. 
ii. 12. 722 is to be taken here, as 
chap. v. 13, viii. 7, in the sense of 
nobility. It was to be expected that 
they might safely be left in their castles 
and fastnesses ; but the prophet de- 
clares that they should form no ex- 
ception, but be treated like the rest 
of the nation. Hendewerk is of 
opinion, that zdols, the boast and 
glory of the apostate Israelites, are 
meant. 

4. The Rabbins, Moses, and Kimchi, 
Abendanus, Noldius, Tremellius, Vi- 


tringa, Lowth, Gesenius in his Lex. 
Man., and others, regard the Yod in 
ὙΠ as the pronominal suffix, and ren- 
der, without me, in the sense of, aban- 
doned by me, and consider Jehovah to 
be the speaker ; but, though the word 
is unquestionably thus used Hos. xiii. 
4, such an interpretation ill suits the 
present connexion. It is rather to be 
taken in the acceptation of ewcept, 7 
not, as Gen, xliii, 3, and with D8 added, 


Amos, iii. 4, Thus the Syr. 3», and 


Schmid. who supplies x. Being pro- 
perly the noun 023, signifying aznihi- 
lation, from 193, to consume, bring or 
come to nothing, it is simply a nega- 
tive particle with the Yod paragogic, 
The nobles must either crouch among 
the prisoners, under the chains with 
which they are to be loaded, or they 
must share the fate of the slain— 
nom occurs nowhere else in the sense 
of among; yet it seems to be purposely 
adopted here instead of 3 or 73, to in- 
dicate the low or prostrate condition 
of the persons described. It may, 
however, be rendered, iz the place of 
the prisoners; 7. e. where they are. 
Thus Kimchi, 01701; though Abenezra 
prefers ~3.—22, though singular, agree- 
ing with 733, ver. 3, is to be rendered 
in the plural, in accordance with = 
following. Such enallage is common 
in Hebrew poetry. 


90 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. X: 


CHAPTER X. 5—34. 


The remainder of this chapter contains a prophecy respecting the invasion of 
Juda by Sennacherib, and the destruction of his army. The purpose of 
God in sending him against the Jews is distinctly stated, 5,6; his proud 
boastings in reference to his conquests, and his intentions against Jerusalem 
are described, 6—11,; the Divine punishment to be inflicted upon him and 
his army, when they had finished their work, is denounced, 12—19 ; pro- 
mises of mercy are made to the small remnant of the Jews, 20—23 ; and 
they are assured of the signal interposition of God on their behalf, 24—27 ; 
the rapid approach of the Assyrian army to Jerusalem, and the consterna- 
tion of the neighbouring cities are then admirably depicted, 28—32; and 
the section closes with an abrupt description of its entire discomfiture, 

From ver. 11, it would appear that this prophecy was delivered subsequent to 
the capture of Samaria, which took place in the sixth year of Hezekiah, but 
earlier than the fourteenth year, in the course of which the threatened 


invasion happened. 


5 Wo to the Assyrian! the rod of mine anger! 
The staff in whose hand is that of my wrath. 
6 Against an impious nation I will send him, 
And against the people of my indignation will I give him a 


charge ; 


To seize the spoil; and to take the prey ; 
And to tread them down like the mire of the streets. 


5. Wx, to correspond with 073 fol- 
lowing, must here be regarded as 
denoting the Assyrians ; but as the 
king of Assyria is introduced imme- 
diately after, it is better to render it 
in the singular. Instead of xm, 
eight MSS., another at first hand, and 
one in the margin, read 778; but the 
reading seems to have originated in 
an attempt to get over the difficulty 
occasioned by 8, which after all is 
only the usual substitute for the sub- 
stantive verb. Hitzig violently ex- 
scinds D073, and Secker proposes to 
read DY instead of it. The sentence 
is elliptical ; requiring Wx to be sup- 
plied after 87, and 7 to be repeated 
before Ὅν, It will then literally read 
thus: And the rod which is in their 
hand is the rod of my indignation, The 
Assyrians are first represented as the 


instrument of Divine punishment, 
and then as themselves employing 
their military weapons in inflicting it, 

6. For 27, see note on chap. ix. 16, 
The people against which he was to 
be sent was that of Judah. They 
were now to experience the evils 
which they had seen inflicted upon 
others, without taking warning. Ge- 
senius, Hitzig, and others, suppose 
Ephraim to be meant ; but the refe- 
rence to the taking of Samaria, vers. 
9, 10, 11, is decidedly opposed to this 
view of the subject. ‘uy ov is the 
genitive of object ; the people on whom 
my wrath is to be inflicted —ODo Ὁ inv», 
according to the Keri: lit. fo place it 
a treading: i.e.to tread them, or cause 
them to be trodden upon. The usual 
term for mire, in such connexion, is 
not 9, but 797, which properly signi- 


CHAP. X.] 


ISATAH. 


91 


7 But as for him, he thinketh not so, 
Neither doth his heart so intend ; 


But to destroy is in his heart, 


And to cut off nations not a few. 
8 For he saith, Are not my princes altogether kings? 


Is not Calno as Carchemish ? 
Is not Hamath as Arpad? 
Is not Samaria as Damascus ? 


fies clay, and is also thus employed, 
Job xxx. 19. 

7. 3 for D8 33, but, on the contrary. 
ur 2, not a few, a litotes for many. 


~ ¥ ~ v 
Thus the Syr. Hee |SeS88, many 
people. 

8. The Assyrian monarch is here, 
with great effect, introduced as boast- 
ing of the number of his conquests ; 
asserting, that there were not any of 
his princes who had not had the regal 
dignity conferred upon them. Of 
course, by 0220 we are to understand, 
not absolute sovereigns, but satraps or 
viceroys, each having his separate 
kingdom or province, which he go- 
verned, subject to the supreme ruler, 
who, in reference to his dominion over 
them, is styled 0°22 722, Ling of kings, 
Ezek. xxvi. 7; 82370 729, Dan. ii. 37. 
Compare the title anciently assumed 
by the king of Persia, Ezra vii. 12, 
and still retained in the formula, 


aitals, Shahinshah, “the Shah of 
Shabs ;” | jl lala, “the Sultan 


of Sultans,’ which is given to the 


Grand Seignor ; the Egypt. ΟΟ ΩΤ ΕἸ 
\ τ δὲν! 
MN COY'TENIOY'; and the Ethiopic 


“SRW: £'724'b: which have 
the same signification. Comp. also 
ἄναξ ἀνάκτων, Aschyl. Suppl. 533. 

9. 1273, Calno, written 7352, Calneh, 
Gen. x. 10 ; 7222, Amos vi. 2; and, by 
dropping the 5, 723, Ezek. xxvii. 23. 
LXX. Χαλάνη, Ctesiphon, avery ancient, 
large, and celebrated city, on the 
eastern bank of the Tigris, opposite 
to Seleucia. It was afterwards the 
winter residence of the Persian kings, 
till about the time of Mohammed ; 


and together with Seleucia, obtained 
from the Arabs, in later times, the 


name of rl, El-Madain, “the 


Two Cities;” but all that now 
remains are the ruins of a palace, 
and numerous mounds of rubbish.— 


wns, Arab. Kaas δ, Κιρκήσιον, Cer- 
The word is 
OF 
compounded of ΤΆ, Syr. log, acastle, 
and 2, a proper name. It was a 
strongly fortified town, on the eastern 
bank of the Euphrates, at the point 
where it is joined by the Chaboras, 
and thus possessed the advantages of 
an insular position. It was taken by 
Necho, king of Egypt, and retaken by 
Nebuchadnezzar, 2 Chron. xxxv. 20; 
2 Kings xxiii. 29 ; Jer. xlvi. 2. The 
conquest mentioned by Isaiah is sup- 
posed to have been made by Tiglath- 
pileser. This city was celebrated in 
the time of the Romans, and formed 
their last fortress in the direction of 
Persia. No notice is taken of its 
ruins by modern travellers.—non, still 


called ae, Hamath, by the Arabs; 


LXX. Ἔμάθ, Αἰμάθ, Ἣμάθ; a large 
city of Syria, pleasantly situated on 
both sides of the Orontes, near the 
northern confines of Palestine. It 
was originally peopled by the Pheni- 
cians, Gen. x. 18, and in course of 
time became the capital of a kingdom 
or principality of the same name, the 
king of which was one of David's 
allies, 2 Sam. viii. 9. It is the cele- 
brated city to which the Greeks gave 
the name of Epiphania, and continues 
to be a place of great note, containing 
upwards of thirty thousand inhabit- 
ants, and its government comprising 


cusium or Cuircessum. 


92 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. X. 


10 As my hand hath found the kingdoms of the idols, 


And their graven images— 


That were superior to those of Jerusalem and Samaria— 
11 As I have done to Samaria and her idols, 
Shall I not do to Jerusalem and her images ? 
12 But it shall come to pass when the Lord hath finished the whole 


of his work 


On mount Zion and Jerusalem, 


about one hundred and twenty small 
towns or villages—T 1, Syr. = 3 


Arpad, another city of Syria, at a 
short distance from Hamath, with 
which, for this reason, it is usually 
associated, 2 Kings xvili. 34, xix. 13 ; 
Jer. xlix. 23. Déderlein and others 
suppose it to have been the same with 
™ys, drvad, Gen. x. 18; Ezek. xxvii. 
8,11; but this was a Pheenician city, 
situated on a rock on the coast of 
the Mediterranean, now called Ruad. 
No traces of Arpad have been found 
in later times.—The boast of the As- 
syrian monarch is, that none of these 
cities, however strongly fortified, had 
been able to resist his arms; they had 
all equally fallen before him. 

10, 11. 87 is a collective noun, 
which usually takes the article. Ἢ 7832 
signifies fo reach, attain to, acquire, 10. 
reference to the putting forth of the 
hand in order to find or seize any 
thing ; with > following, ¢o reach in the 
way of punishment, Ps. xxi. 9.—n329 
xa. The different nations of anti- 
quity had their tutelary gods, under 
whose patronage they placed them- 
selves, and to whom they considered 
themselves as belonging. That the 
king of Assyria, who was himself a 
worshipper of 0°? 2x, zon-entities, should 
speak of them in this light, has ap- 
peared to some to be out of place 
here ; and they have endeavoured to 
account for the language, on the prin- 
ciple, that Isaiah, by whom all pagan 
deities were thus regarded, puts the 
term into the mouth of the monarch, 
The supposition, however, is unneces- 
sary, Since it is obvious that though 
he did not entertain the enlightened 
views of the Hebrews, he must have 
regarded foreign gods as impotent 


and worthless, especially after having, 
with so much ease, conquered the 
cities and countries of which they were 
the professed protectors. Whether 
ἹῸ be here designed to express supe- 
riority in zumber or in power is some- 
what doubtful; yet the latter idea 
seems the more natural under the 
circumstances of the case; the king 
of Assyria having had an opportunity 
of ascertaining the weakness of both 
kingdoms by subjugating Ephraim, 
and by his being called to assist Judah 
against her enemies,—D3zY is not in 
reality different in sense from Ox 
preceding, but is used synonymously 
with it, and with Ὁ ῸΕ, for the sake of 
variety. At the same time, as derived 
from 32, to work, labour, be in pain, it 
conveys at once the ideas of human 
origin, and the grief and pain consequent 
upon idol-worship. Comp. Ps. xvi. 4. 
There is a want of strict corre- 
spondence between the protasis and 
the apodosis in these two verses, 
occasioned by the comparison made 
between the foreign images and those 
of Samaria and Jerusalem. To per- 
fectly agree, the proposition must 
have run thus: As my hand hath 
found the kingdoms of the idols, and 
their images that were superior to 
those of Jerusalem and Samaria, so 
shall it find, ἕο, But as Samaria had 
already been taken, the proposition 
required to be modified, which has 
been done by transferring the com- 
parison to these two cities; and by 
introducing a new protasis in the 
form of an interrogation, an apodosis 
perfectly corresponding to it is brought 
out. The agreement is marked by 
the correlatives Wx) and }2. 

12. Having allowed the king of As- 
syria to carry forward his vaunting to 


CHAP. X.] 


ISATAH. 


93 


Then [saith he] I will punish the fruit of the proud heart of 


Assyria’s king, 


And the arrogance of his lofty looks. 


13 


For he saith, By the power of my hand I have done it, 


And by my wisdom; for I am skilful. 

Yea, I have removed the boundaries of the nations, 
And plundered their treasures ; 

And as an hero, I have brought down the enthroned. 


14 


Yea, my hand hath found, as a nest, the riches of the people; 


And as men gather eggs that are left, 
So have I gathered all the earth ; 


the very point at which he was to be 
arrested in his proud career, Jehovah 
states the reason why he was per- 
mitted to proceed so far, and then 
declares he will punish him for his 


pride. Y¥3, 6s S49, has usually 


the signification of cutting, amputating ; 
but as it is specially used of a weaver, 
cutting off his web when he has 
finished it, the idea of finishing or com- 
pleting came to be attached to it, Isa. 
XxXxvlii. 12; Lam. ii. 17; Zech. iv. 9. 
Seventeen of Kennicott’s MSS. read 
m7; one has this reading in the mar- 
gin; and another reads 773m. Ac- 
cording to Lowth, the former is also 
found in three printed editions. In 
wx 772 327 728, four nouns succes- 
sively occur in construction ; three 
frequently thus occur, as Gen. xlvii. 
9; Job xii. 24; Isa. xili. 4; and in 
1 Chron. ix. 13, not fewer than jive ; 
though, strictly speaking, some of 
them express only one compound 
idea. Between ®, and ΓΝ there is 
a slight paronomasia, just as there is 
an obvious connexion between the 
meaning of the words—myxen being 
used here in the acceptation of glory 
or beauty as applicable to a stately 
tree, covered with the richest foliage. 
Comp. s®, ver. 33. The heart being 
regarded as the root of our actions, 
the looks correspond to the leaves, 
and the actions themselves to the 
fruit. A finer picture of an arrogant 
and insolent conqueror than that 
drawn in this passage cannot be 
imagined. 

13. mrny, according to the Keri 


many, but correctly nivny, lit. things 
prepared, kept in readiness, laid up, 1. 6. 


goods, treasures, riches, from WY, Mc, 
paratus fuit, reposuit ; ΣᾺ tic, discus, 


in quo reponuntur adornamenta, &c., 
and by meton, the precious things con- 
ἊΝ ¥ “ 


tained in such vessel; Syr. (Osa), 


their treasures. — NW, or, as it is spelt 
in a great number of MSS. ‘no, in 
many ‘YO; in others ‘now: the Poél 
of ποῦ, to plunder, take as spoil —Kimchi 
thinks that in Y2x2 either the Aleph is 
epenthetic, or the word is a dictio 
composita, formed of V3) and 3s, 
which have both the same significa- 
tion, but combined, tend to augment 
the idea. There can be little doubt, 
however, that the true pointing is 
vax, like a mighty one, or hero. The 3, 
Gesenius and Hendewerk take to be 
the Caph veritatis. See on chap. 1. 7.— 
DIB, sitting, is elliptical for nixod °2187, 
those who sit on thrones, i. 6. kings and 
judges. Comp. ἔς a throne, and 


Ps. xxix. 10. The boast of the con- 
queror is, that, solely in virtue of his 
own native power and policy, he had 
put down the distinctions which sepa- 
rated one nation from another, de- 
throned their kings, and enriched 
himself with their treasures. 

14. Describes the completeness of 
the Assyrian conquests, as well as the 
facility with which they had been 
effected. No resistance was offered, 
nor did any dare to complain. The 
reference to the taking of eggs, or 


M 


94 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. X, 


There was none that moved the wing, 
Or opened the beak, or chirped! 
15 Shall the axe boast itself against him that heweth with it? 
Shall the saw magnify itself against him that moveth it ? 
As if the rod should wave them that raise it: 
As if the staff should raise him who is not wood. 
16 Wherefore the Lord, Jehovah of Hosts, shall send upon his fat 


ones leanness, 


And under his nobility shall he kindle a burning, like the 


burning of fire. 


young birds, out of a nest, is exqui- 
site; and no language could more 
appropriately have expressed the in- 
satiable rapacity of an invading foe, 
and the feebleness of those whom he 
attacked. By yp, west, is meant the 
contents of the nest. 

15. Again the boastful monarch is 
abruptly checked by Him who had 
employed him as his instrument, and 
to whose control he was in absolute 
subjection. The absurdity of his 
vaunting is forcibly depicted by sup- 
posing the case of an inanimate tool 
disengaging itself from the power of 
the intelligent agent by whom it is 
used, and treating him as if they had 
exchanged places with each other. 
m2 signifies fo wave any thing up and 
down, and in Hiph. as here, to cause 
any thing thus to move, such as the 
saw, or the axe. The change of the 
singular to the plural in 72%, is to be 
ascribed to the introduction of the 
term ©0323, rod, which Jehovah had 
employed of the king of Assyria, ver. 
5, and which is thus again applied 
here with great effect. Comp. for 
similar plural designations of God, Ps. 
exlix.‘2; Hecles. x1i:71;-Isa. xxii. 11, 
liv. 5; and see Dr. J. Pye Smith on 
the Person of Christ, vol. i. p. 468. 
With respect to the passage itself, the 
MSS. exhibit considerable discrepancy 
in their readings. Sixty-six MSS, 
seven more originally, seven now, and 
upwards of twenty printed editions, 
read, ὙΌΣ nx) oI HpI73, As if the rod 
should wave itself AND those who raise it. 
Eight MSS., originally one, and now 
another, have the singular 122, HIM 
that raiseth it, which is supported by 
the Syr. and Vulg. Four or five 


codices read WY) ὅν, but both these 
latter appear evidently to be emenda- 
tions. The former yields an admirable 
sense; but as it wants the suffrages 
of the ancient versions, it may also be 
the result of conjecture—a conjecture 
more ingenious than most of those 
supplied by the Masoretic school.— 
yr). By a Hebrew idiom the nega- 
tive particle δ, prefixed to nouns, often 
gives them a directly contrary mean- 
ing. Thus 2s, “that which is xoé 
God,” i.e. an idol, Deut. xxxii. 21; 
Jer. v. 7; Ws 8), and DIN 8°, Him who is 
not man, i.e. God, Isa, xxxi. 8; and so 
in the present instance by him who is 
not wood, is rweant God, who is of a 
nature altogether different. 

16. A resumption of the threaten- 
ing briefly introduced ver. 12, but 
dropped to leave room for a further 
exhibition of the haughty boastings 
of the Assyrian. It is now specially 
taken up, and enlarged upon to ver. 
19.—There can be no doubt that, in 
consequence of Jewish superstition, 
the Divine name has here been tam- 
pered with by some copyist. ‘18 iNT 
mixiz occurs nowhere else in the He- 
brew Bible: but isis Ti PWT occurs 
chap. i. 24, i. 1, x. 33, xix. 4; and it) 
is the reading of the present verse in 
upwards of fifty MSS. and more than 
twelve printed editions.—r22u and 
4739, correspond to and elucidate each 
other. They are both abstract nouns 
expressive of the robust and stately 
appearance of the Assyrian captains. 
Comp. Ps. lxxviii. 31; Judg. 11. 29, 
where the adjective yov is similarly 
used; and Isa. xvii. 4, where both 
terms occur as here. Targ. 4222), Ais 
princes or great ones, by explanation. 


CHAP. X.] 


ISATAH. 


95 


17 Yea, the Light of Israel shall become a fire, 


And his Holy One a flame ; 


And it shall burn and consume 
His thorns and his briers in a day. 
18 And the glory of his forest and of his plantation, 
Both soul and body shall it consume ; 
And he shall faint as an invalid. 


—In WP? WW. is a paronomasia; 
comp. chap. xxii. 17; and the figure is 
derived from the custom of collecting 
heaps of thorns, &c., and then setting 
fire to them from below. The passage 
predicts the sudden and miraculous 
destruction of the Assyrian army 
recorded 2 Chron. xxxii. 21; Isa. 
XXXVI. 36. 

17. °xTwX, Jehovah is called the 
Light of Israel, because he was the 
author of their prosperity and happi- 
ness; so that the phrase contains a 
double metaphor. Zhorns and briers 
stand here for the common soldiers, 
not so much perhaps in contempt, as 
in reference to the spears and lances 
with which they were armed, and in 
illustration of the figure introduced 
ver. 16. 

18. To express still more strongly 
the greatness of the destruction with 
which the hostile army was to be 
visited, it is compared to the con- 
sumption of a forest and a plantation 
by fire—22, properly the name of a 
celebrated mountain in Palestine, but 
also used of other localities resembling 
it in scenery and fertility, Josh. xv. 
55; Isa. xxix. 17; or rather, perhaps, 
it took the name from them, as thus 
distinguished. Gesenius considers the 
word to be a derivative from 02, an 
orchard, garden, vineyard, and 5 used as 
a diminutive; but this appropriation 
of > is not fully established. Lowth 
proposes 8, which is also uncertain. 
Wwarty) wa, from the soul even to the 
Jlesh, a proverbial mode of expression, 
denoting the entire person, and so used 
adverbially for altogether, entirely. v3, 
opposed to 93, signifies body, Job xiv. 
22; Prov. xiv. 30.— Ὁ and 1, connected 
as here, mean izclusive of, and compre- 
hend the whole of what is specified, 
as in Jonah 11]. 5—tp3 Ddn2,  Lowth 
conjectures that the LXX. must have 


read 0d) wNn2; but this is highly im- 
probable, since their duplicate form, ὁ 
φεύγων as ὁ φεύγων, exactly tallies 
with that of the present text, only 
attaching the signification of flight to 
both words. To neither, however, 
does such signification attach, except 
we were to regard 003 as the Pilel of 
Ὁ"), which its position forbids. The 
following words of the LXX. ἀπὸ φλο- 
γὸς καιομένης, are merely added for the 
purpose of completing the meaning, 
and have no reference to 0093. The 
assonance of the words, which is quite 
in the style of Isaiah, and of the 
Orientals generally, affords satisfactory 
evidence that the reading is genuine. 
We have, therefore, no choice but to 
select one or other of the two ideas 
conveyed by 0D2: fo elevate or carry a 
standard; or, to be an invalid, sick, &e. 
The former is that of the rabbins, and 
from them, of most of the received 
versions, of Dathe, and others; the 
latter is adopted by Hezel, Schelling, 
Rosenmiuller, Gesenius, Hitzig, and 


Hendewerk. Comp. the Syr. Ἰρλ 9 
sick; the Arab. (yw, Fut. O. and I. 
siccus fuit ; sitabunda fuit ; 
Uren’ extremum vite spiritus; YA 


mm mI, ferme mortuus fuit. Castel. 
Comp. note on chap. lix. 19. The 
meaning is, that the king himself, 
overwhelmed by the miraculous over- 
throw of his army, should be so com- 
pletely dispirited as to resemble a 
wretched invalid, sinking through 
weakness and want of sustenance. 
The supposition of an ensign or stand- 
ard-bearer being referred to, proceeds 
upon the principle that the army 
should be affected by his giving way, 
whereas the connexion requires that 
the action specified should be conse- 


sitivit, 


90 ISATAH. 


[CHAP, x. 


19 And the remnant of the trees of his forest shall be few; 
So that a child may count them. 


20 And it shall be in that day, 


That the remnant of Israel, and the escaped of the house of 


Jacob, 


Shall no more stay themselves upon him that smote them, 
But they shall truly stay themselves upon Jehovah, the Holy 


One of Israel. 


21 Yet only a remnant shall return, a remnant of Jacob 


To tHe Miauty Gop; 


22 For though thy people Israel be as the sand of the sea, 
Only a remnant shall turn to him. 


quent upon the destruction of the 
army. 

19. ἜΘ is not, according to the 
usage of the language, a xwmber, in the 
sense of xumerous, but few in number, 
which the following clause also shews. 
Comp. 7802 ’n, Gen. xxxiv. 30; Deut. 
iv. 27; and 7209, by itself, as here, 
Deut. xxxiii. 6. The number of men 
smitten in the camp of the Assyrians 
amounted to a hundred and eighty-five 
thousand. Isa, Xxxvii. 36. 

20, si Oa, ἐμ that day, is not to be 
restricted to the precise day of the 
fall of the enemy, but includes also 
the future. See note, chap. iv. 1. 
The prophet might have employed 
the verb yj sy, as chap. vii. 9, to 
express the exercise of trust in God; 
but the idea of 79, staff, being 
suggested by 1132, him that smote him, 
it was more natural to employ the 
Niphal of jv, Zo lean, as one does 
upon a staff, for support. Such of the 
Jews as survived the calamity would 
be convinced of the folly of dependence 
on Assyria, and henceforth put their 
trust in Jehovah alone, from whom 
their confidence ought never to have 
been transferred. 283, in truth, truly, 
i.e. sincerely—the meaning being, 
that when attacked by external ene- 
mies in future, they should not profess 
to make God their confidence, and yet 
call in a foreign king to protect them, 
as they had lately done when threat- 
ened by the confederated forces of 
their neighbours. The prediction was 
fulfilled in the subsequent history of 
the Jews. 


21—23. Having spoken of ww, ¢he 
remnant, Isaiah repeats the term with 
emphasis in this verse, to shew that 
how sincere soever might be the 
general trust of the Jews in God, as 
it respected temporal deliverances, 
comparatively few of them would be 
converted to 122 ὅν, Taz Migury Gop, 
i.e. the Messiah, predicted under this 
title, chap. ix. 5. The language is 
exceedingly abrupt and elliptical. Be- 
fore the former δῦ, supply Js, yet 
only. This the 22d verse shews to be 
absolutely requisite in order to com- 
plete the sense; as does also the 
reasoning of the Apostle, Rom. ix. 27, 
28, where the passage, quoted in appli- 
cation to the rejection of Christ by 
the great mass of the Jewish nation, 
would lose its point, were the words 
not to be rendered, “only a remnant 
shall be saved.” See Stuart and Hodge. 
—ia, is usually referred to *2¥, as its 
subject; but this construction, consi- 
dering the position of the word, is 
harsh. It seems much more natural 
to connect it with the verb imme- 
diately before it, and regard 71228 as 
the antecedent. That 3 is also fol- 
lowed by 3, when true conversion is 
meant, see Hos. xii. 7, PWD 7PNa THN). 
—j", completion, consumption, consum- 
mation, entire destruction, from the 
Piel of 723, ἐο be completed, spent, wasted. 
you, decided, determined, not with- 
out primary reference to the incision 
of the sentence pronounced by a judge, 
in some tablet, or other hard sub- 
stance: ~17 signifying ¢o cut, cut into. 
It was hence considered to be fived and 


CHAP. X.] 


ISAIAH. 


97 


A consummation is determined, 
Overflowing with righteousness ; 


23 


Surely a consummation, even that which is determined, 


Shall the Lord, Jehovah of Hosts, effect in the midst of all the 


land. 
94 


Nevertheless thus saith the Lord, Jehovah of Hosts: 


Fear not, O my people! that inhabitest Zion, 


Because of the Assyrian ; 


He may smite thee with the rod, 
And raise his staff against thee, 


In the manner of Egypt; 


25 But yet a very little while, and the indignation shall be 


completed, 


irreversible, which is the idea in the 


is expletive-—Seventy-three MSS. at 
least, originally four more, now five, 
and one in the margin, together with 
seven printed editions, omit 73, as does 
also the Targ.; but it was more likely 
to be omitted than inserted by a 
copyist: the usual forms being /8773, 
or YT. That the plenary form 
exhibited in the textus receptus is 
not without a parallel, comp. 73 
metro, Deut. xi, 6; LXX. ἐν τῇ 
οἰκουμένῃ ὅλῃ. The phrase is emphatic. 
—The entire bearing of these verses, 
viewed in connexion with the applica- 
tion of part of the language by Daniel 
to the final destruction of Jerusalem, 
and the use made of them by Paul as 
above referred to, leaves no room for 
doubt that they were designed by the 
Spirit of God to describe the awful 
punishment to be inflicted on the 
Jewish nation for their rejection of 
the Messiah, and the comparatively 
small number by whom he would be 
received, 

24. The prophet returns to his 
immediate subject—the Assyrian in- 
vasion, and exhorts the people in 
Zion not to be intimidated by the 
event.—}22 has an adversative rather 
than a causal power in this connexion: 


notwithstanding, nevertheless.—O 2 ΤΥῚΒ 
is to be rendered, neither “in the 
way to Egypt,” nor “in the way from 
Egypt,” but, ἐμ the manner of Egypt, i.e. 
as Egypt, or, the Egyptians did—the 
manner in which they acted towards 
the children of Israel. Comp. for this 
use of V3, Ezek. xx. 30. In ver. 26, 
the phrase is similarly used, only with 
this difference, that Egypt, instead of 
being used in the active, is taken in 
the passive acceptation of the term: 
as he did against Egypt. Comp. for 
the passive, Amos. iv. 10. There is 
thus a beautiful contrast between the 
two verses. 

25, ΤΌ OY) occurs again chap. xvi. 
14, xxix. 17; and is appropriately 
given in German, eiz klein wenig. Sy- 
nonymes are frequently used in Heb, 
to express intensity.—oV, ixdiguation, 
signifies here the punishment inflicted 
by Jehovah upon the Jews. When 
that punishment should be completed, 
the Divine displeasure (28) would be 
turned against their enemies, and 
effect their destruction, 023, without 
either the article, or the pronom. affix, 
is quite in the style of Isaiah. See 
chap. xxvi. 20, so that the alteration 
made by Lowth cannot be sustained. 
For oman, their destruction, five MSS., 
three others originally, and seven 
printed editions, read on, their 
perfection, i.e. perfect or complete end: 
but the former, according to usage, is 
the. more appropriate, and has the 
suffrage of most of the ancient ver- 


98 ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. X. 


And my anger in their destruction. 

26 For Jehovah of Hosts shall raise up a scourge against him, 
As the slaughter of Midian, at the rock Oreb. 
His rod shall be upon the sea; he shall raise it 


In the manner of Egypt. 
27 And it shall be in that day, 


That his burden shall be removed from thy shoulder, 


sions. It is derived from 193, Arab. 
«οὖ to grow old, be worn out, come to 


nothing ; hence dy, affictio; "3, failure, 


destruction. 'The letters 3 and 3 being 
very similar, have often been mistaken 
for each other. The prepos. 2? marks 
the object on which the Divine anger 
rests. 

26.) is here equivalent to 33, and in- 
troduces the cause of the destruction 
predicted at the end of the preceding 


ni, Arab. baw, ὦ whip or 


verse. 


scourge, used figuratively to denote 
any hostile invader, or any awful 
plague or calamity which God inflicts 
upon a people. For the reference, see 
Judges vii. 25. As Oreb, one of the 
two kings of Midian, after escaping 
the slaughter of his troops, was taken 
and slain at a rock of the same name, 
so Sennacherib should escape from the 
calamity which destroyed his army, 
but he also should afterwards be 
killed. By 095, the sea, is meant the 
Euphrates, the symbol of the Assyrian 
power. Comp. chap. xix. 5; Nah. iii. 8; 
where it is used of the Nile. For the 
fulfilment, see chap. xxxvil. 36—38. 
The second reference is to the un- 
expected and complete overthrow of 
Pharaoh in the Rea Sea, Exod, xiv. 
26, 27. 

27. This verse shews that the dis- 
comfiture of Sennacherib should be 
followed by the immediate liberation 
of the Jews from the oppressive 
tribute that had been imposed upon 
them, The concluding words > 73ΠῚ 
y2w72Bp, present no difficulty as to 
construction, or in regard to their sig- 
nification, taken separately ; but few 
sentences have more perplexed inter- 
preters, as it respects the sense. Vi- 
tringa fancifully labours to establish 


an identity in meaning between 20 
and χρίσμα, 1 John ii. 27. Secker and 
Lowth indulge as usual in conjecture, 
but very unsatisfactorily. Gesenius 
strongly, but justly, calls the word, 
ὉΠ ὩΣ, which Lowth proposes, an 
Unding, a thing that has no existence 
in the Hebrew language: and with 
Hitzig, Maurer, and others, takes the 
term in the ordinary acceptation of 
fatness, and supposes the prophet to 
be comparing Israel to a fat and wan- 
ton bullock which shakes off the yoke. 
But to this exegesisit must be objected, 
that it neither gives the proper force 
of the verb 719, which signifies ¢o spoil 
or destroy, nor does it suit the con- 
nexion, in which no intimation is 
given of the Jews themselves break- 
ing the yoke that had been imposed 
upon them. Besides, there would 
scarcely be any propriety in intro- 
ducing a clause with this sense, after 
the statement already made in the 
verse, distinctly announcing the re- 
moval of the yoke. I am, therefore, 
inclined with the Targ., Jarchi, 
Kimchi, Munster, Vatablus, Castalio, 
Grotius, and others, to consider }2W 
as denoting the oi/ with which the 
Jewish Kings were anointed, and 
hence by common figure, ¢he persons 
thus anointed. Most of those who 
adopt this acceptation of the word, 
apply the passage to Hezekiah, and 
suppose the meaning to be that, 2 
yoo, for his sake, as the anointed king 
of the Jews, the Lord had broken the 
Assyrian yoke. But may we not with 
Munster ask: “Quid si Propheta hic 
respexerit ad Christum Domini?” 
Thus the Targ. 8d 077,779 NY IAN}, 
and the nations shall be broken before the 
Messiah. This interpretation well 
agrees with the manner and design δῇ 
the prophet, who ever and anon re- 
verts to the promised Deliverer, and 


CHAP. iX.] 


And his yoke from thy neck : 


ISATAH. 


99 


And the yoke shall be destroyed because of the anointing. 
28 He hath arrived at Aiyath; he hath passed through Migron ; 
At Michmash he hath laid up his baggage. 
29 They have gone through the pass ; 
Geba they have made their night-quarters. 


frequently, as here, most abruptly, in 
consequence of some temporal cir- 
cumstance or event which the Holy 
Spirit employed, in order to suggest 
Him and the great salvation to his 
mind. What strongly corroborates 
this view of the passage, is the close 
connexion between the words in ques- 
tion and chap. xi., which is undeniably 
predictive of the Messiah, and must 
have followed immediately but for 
the intervening description of Senna- 
cherib’s impending march against 
Jerusalem. In the Translation, how- 
ever, 1 have not felt authorized to 
employ the term Azointed, but have 
retained the word already existing in 
our common English version, which 
is at once true to the original as a 
translation, and yet furnishes an index 
to the just exegesis of the words. 

28. From this verse to the thirty- 
second inclusive, we have a minute 
and animated graphic description of 
the approach of the Assyrians to- 
wards Jerusalem, and the conster- 
nation into which it threw the 
inhabitants of those towns which lay 
in their route. That it is an historical 
description of the past, Hitzig, and 
those who think with him, can only 
maintain on a settled principle of un- 
belief with respect to prophetic inspi- 
ration. Even Gesenius is constrained 
to admit that it is zdeal; which would 
be true, if thereby were meant that 
the circumstances existed at the time 
only in the mind of the prophet, and 
in that of Him by whom he was in- 
spired : but what he intends is, that 
it was merely matter of imagination 
and poetical colouring. Consistency 
of interpretation, however, compels 
to the conclusion, that, whatever 
there may be of singular poetic beauty 
in the passage, it is strictly propheti- 
cal, and was historically fulfilled. 
What decides it to relate to the 


future is the occurrence of Impera- 
tives, ver. 30, which we never find in 
descriptions of the past.—nv, Aiyath, 
LXX. Tai, ’Ayyai, occurs only here 
under this form, but is called ~Y, Aiya, 
Neh. xi. 31, and doubtless is the same 
as Y, ‘YT, 47, a royal city of the Canaan- 
ites, situated on an elevation, within 
the northern confines of Benjamin, at 
a short distance to the east of Bethel, 
Gen. xii. 8, and nearly due north-east 
from Jerusalem. It was taken and de- 
stroyed by Joshua, chap. viii., but was 
afterwards, to some extent, rebuilt, 
Ezra ii. 28. In the time of Eusebius 
and Jerome, only a few inconsiderable 
ruins remained.—j122, Migron, the LXX. 
by mistake, Mayyed#, is described, 
1 Sam. xiv. 2, as situated at the north- 
ern extremity of the hilly country 
of Gibeah, at some distance to the 
south-east of Bethel—wn20, Ezra ii. 
27, D222, LXX. Maypas, Josephus, 
Maxpa; a town still farther in ad- 
vance, towards the south-west, but 
east of Bethaven, 1 Sam. xiii. 5; and, 
according to Eusebius, near Ramah, 
about nine miles from Jerusalem. In 
his time it was a place of some note. 
It was chiefly important in a military 
point of view, on account of the pass 
in its vicinity, mentioned in the fol- 
lowing verse. This place the As- 
syrians chose as the depét of their 
baggage, considering it a fit place to 
fall back upon in case of a repulse. 
29. Special notice is taken of the 
pass at Michmash presenting no ob- 
stacle to Sennacherib. This pass was 
confined by two sharp cliffs, called 
Bozez and Seneh: the one facing 
Michmash on the north, and the other 
Gibeah on the south. In the time of 
Saul it was defended by a garrison of 
Philistines, 1 Sam. xiv. 4, 5, and is 
represented as exceedingly steep, ver. 
13. From the term occurring in the 
plural, nn3r2, 1 Sam. xiv. 4, it appears 


100 


Ramah trembleth ; 
Gibeah of Saul fleeth. 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP.. xX. 


30 Give a shrill cry, O daughter of Gallim! 


Listen, Laish ! 
Aniyah! Anathoth! 
31 Madmenah is fled; 


The inhabitants of Gebim have taken to flight. 


to have consisted of more than one 
gorge or defile: probably there was 
one main opening, in which were 
two or more divisions, formed by 
remaining portions of the rock.—?1, 
Geba, LXX. by mistake, from ver. 28, 
᾿Αγγαί, elsewhere, Γαβαά, a city of the 
Levites on the northern limit of the 
tribe of Judah, but in that of Ben- 
jamin ; hence called Geba of Benjamin, 
1 Kings xv. 22.—%9 179 922 is not to be 
rendered, Geba is their quarters ; but, 
they have taken up quarters at Geba: 1. 6. 
for the night. Lowth, and after him, 
Déderlein, Dathe, and others, taking 
222 to be the pronoun of the first per- 
son plural, and not finding it to agree 
in construction, change the reading 
into 192, to them; whereas it is the 
third singular of the verb 13), fo remain 
over night, to tarry for a night. For the 
form 712 752, comp. 1309 120, 2 Sam, iv. 
5, where nx, the sign of the Accus. is 
expressed.— 1294, Ramah, lit. the high 
place, so called from its elevated situa- 
tion. It also lay in the tribe of Ben- 
jamin, about six miles north from 
Jerusalem, in the direction of Bethel. 
Its site is now occupied by a village 
named Nebi Sahamiel, and it is not 
to be confounded with another town 
of the same name, now called Ramla, 
on the road from Jerusalem to Joppa, 
which was first built in the eighth 
century.—™Kxv nvi3, Gibeah of Saul, 
LXX. πόλιν Σαούλ, so called to distin- 
guish it from a town of the same 
name in Judah, Josh. xv. 57, and 
from its having been the birth-place, 
and afterwards the residence of Saul, 
1 Sam. x. 26, xv. 34. An Arab village 


called Liste, Jib, is now supposed 


to Sie ck its site. 

30. 03, Gallim, occurs elsewhere 
only 1 Sam. xxv. 44, and in connexion 
with ὧδ, Zaish, as here ; only the lat- 


ter is there the name of a man, and 
not of a place. Though we have no 
other notice of a Laish in Judah, it is 
clear from the present passage, that a 
place of that name must have existed ; 
for the construction that would sup- 
pose a reference to the celebrated city 
so called, near the sources of the Jor- 
dan, is too violent to be admitted. 
The 7 is paragogic.—™» Aniyah, has 
unnecessarily perplexed interpreters. 
It is neither an adjective nor a verb, 
but the proper name of a place, most 
probably Bethania, or Bethany, i. 8. 
mya, the ma being dropped, as freq. 
in proper names. Comp. Beth-As- 
maveth, and Asmaveth ; Beth-Baal-meon, 
and Baal-meon. Hitzig suggests 7229, 
Ananiah, which occurs Neh. xi. 32, in 
connexion with Nob and Anathoth as 
in Isaiah, and is probably only another 
form of ™2¥, the Nun being dropped, 
and compensation being made by 
Dagesh inserted in the Yod; as jpx 
for 28. What supports this opinion, 
is the proximity of Bethany to Ana- 
thoth ; the former being two, and the 
latter three miles from Jerusalem, in 
the direction of Jericho. The in- 
habitants of Gallim were /o raise a 
shrill ery, ἜΣ, and thus give the alarm 
to the three neighbouring towns of 
Laish, Aniyah, and Anathoth, the 
situation of which being more towards 
the east, would afford their inhabitants 
time to escape before the enemy ad- 
vanced.—niniy, <Anathoth was one of 
the cities of Benjamin given to the 
priests, and was the birth-place of 
Jeremiah, Jer.i.1. It is still known 
by the name of Andta. 

31, 32. Of Madmenah and Gebim we 
have no further notices : 72212, Mad- 
mannah, Josh. xv. 31, lying too far 
south to suit the present connexion,— 


wy7, the Hiph. of ny, Arab. dle, cor- 
/ 


CHAP. X.| 


32 A day more, to halt at Nob, 


ISAIAH. 


101 


And then he will shake his hand 
Against the mountain of the daughter of Zion, 


Against the hill of Jerusalem. 


33 Behold! the Lord Jehovah of Hosts 
Shall cut off the branches with a tremendous blow; 
The high of stature shall be cut down, 
And the lofty shall be brought low. 

34 And he shall hew the thickets of the forest with iron, 


fugit ad aliquem, to flee for refuge, but 
used intransitively to agree with 7772, 
—ni, Nob, LXX. Νόμβα, (though here 
reading 1, they have rendered it τῇ 
χειρί,) a sacerdotal city, so near to 
Jerusalem that the latter was visible 
from it, though surrounded by moun- 
tains. It hada sanctuary, in which a 
regular religious service was performed, 
1 Sam. xxi. 4, 6, 9, xxii. 13—The 
article in ΟἿ has little or no force, 
and may best be rendered indefinitely. 
The meaning is, that Sennacherib 
would only spend a day at Nob, in 
order to reconnoitre the city of Jeru- 
salem, muster his troops, and prepare 
for the attack—vT 55, like 5y πὸ Fp, 
means to shake the hand as a gesture 
of threatening—— For m3, in the 
phrase j}?z27~3, the Keri proposes m3, 
which is the textual reading of a vast 
number of MSS., and several of the 
earliest and best editions, and is 
adopted in that of Hahn. None of the 
ancient versions have read™3, house. 
ory nyu, the hill of Jerusalem, occurs 
only in this place. 

33. Having conducted the proud 
Assyrian within view of Jerusalem, 
and allowed him and his forces a day 
to rest in the vicinity, the prophet at 
once changes his tone, summons at- 
tention to the sudden and unexpected 
prevention of the attack by a miracu- 
lous intervention of Divine power, and 
describes, in language similar to that 
which he had employed vers. 17—19, 
the tremendous overthrow that would 
ensue. That the subject of the de- 
struction here predicted is the king of 
Assyria and his army, and not that of 
Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar, which 
Michaelis, Koppe, Déderlein, and 
others, suppose to be meant, cannot, 


I think, be fairly called in question.— 
ΘΟ, ς αὐ, dissecutt, to divide, sepa- 


rate one thing from another, break 
or lop off branches from a tree. The 
verb occurs nowhere else.—7}82 = 7188 
signifies beautiful branches, the orna- 
ment of trees; and, metaphorically, 
the most showy and imposing parts 
of an army. Forty MSS. read 77», 
which signifies a wine-press; and thus 
the Targ., Symm., and Theod., but 
erroneously. See Gesenius ἐκ Joc. 

34, The metaphor of cutting down 
a wood is continued, only a promi- 
nence is given to the instrument; and 
the metaphor is amplified by a com- 
parison of the closely-united bands of 
the army to intertwined thickets of 
underwood, and of the whole mass of 
which it was composed, to Lebanon, 
the largest and most majestic moun- 
tain in the vicinity of Judea, This 
celebrated mountain, in Heb. 7522), the 


White Mountain, Arab. el A>, 


the Snow Mountain, from the perpetual 
snows which cover its summits, con- 
sists of two parallel ridges, stretching 
in a northerly direction between Phoe- 
nicia and Damascus, and intersected 


by Lani], the Bekaa, or valley, 


otherwise known by the name of 
Coeelosyria. The more easterly goes 
by the name of Anti-Libanus, and is 
upwards of 9,000 feet high. The 
Arabs say of it, that it carries winter 
on its head, spring on its shoulders, 
harvest in its bosom, while summer 
sleeps at its feet. Its terraces are 
covered with gardens and cultivated 
fields, and present the most enchant- 
ing prospects to the eye of the tra- 


N 


102 ISAIAH. [CHAP, ΧΙ: 


And by a mighty one shall Lebanon fall. 


veller. By ‘m3, izstruments made of angel by whom the catastrophe was to 
iron, Such as axes and hatchets, are be effected. Thus Kimchi. 
meant; and Ὑπὸ denotes the mighty 


CHAPTER ΧΙ. 


By an easy transition, the prophet here introduces the person, character, and 
kingdom of the Messiah, 1—10; describes the extension of the Gospel 
among the nations of the earth; and predicts the restoration of the 
Hebrews from the Babylonish captivity, and from their various minor 
dispersions, and their happy union in their own land, 11—16. That it is 
to a past and not to any future restoration of the Jews reference is here 
made, is manifest from the mention made, ver. 14, of the Philistines, &c., 
who no longer exist, but whom we are compelled to understand as being 
literally meant, on the same principle that Judah, Ephraim, Assyria, Egypt, 
&c., are to be interpreted literally, 11—13. 

With respect to the application of this prophecy to the Messiah, a greater 
degree of unanimity obtains among interpreters than in reference to almost 
any other. The exposition given of the first verse, in the Targ. 8372 pm’ 
ra TMI2 23 NW wT Ta, “And the king shall come forth from the sons 
of Jesse, and THE ΜΕΒΒΙΔῊ shall grow up from his sons’ sons,” has been 
sustained and defended by Jarchi, Abarbanel, and Kimchi; by the best 
biblical scholars since the Reformation; especially, among the moderns, by 
Michaelis, Déderlein, Lowth, Koppe, Beckhaus, Reinhard, v. ἃ. Palm, De- 
reser, Jahn, Rosenmiiller, and Hengstenberg; and even Hichhorn, Gesenius, 
and Hitzig, are forced to fall in with such application, though, as might be 
expected, they only recognise their ¢dea/ Messiah in the chapter. It appears 
from Theodoret, that, in his time, some of the Jews considered Zerubbabel 
to be meant; Ephraim Syrus, Abenezra, v.d. Hardt, White, Bardt, Hezel, 
Paulus, and some others, refer it to Hezekiah; Barhebreeus, Grotius, and 
Dathe, to Hezekiah primarily, and secondarily to Christ. Its application, 
however, to our Saviour is clearly sanctioned by the N. T. Not to insist on 
our Lord’s declaring that he is the Roor and the Orrsprine of David, Rev. 
xxii. 16, (comp. chap. v. 5,) we find ver. 10 expressly quoted, Rom. xv. 12, 
to prove his dominion over the believing Gentiles. On 2 Thess. ii. 8, see 
ver, 4, 


1 Buta Shoot shall come forth from the stem of Jesse; 


1. The 1 at once closely “connects —Nx. is used of the coming forth, or 
the chapters, and intimates the con- springing up of plants, 1 Kings v. 13 ; 
trast between the king of Assyria, Gen.1, 12, 24; Isa. lxi. 11; but also 
and the Messiah, about to be described, tropically of descendants, Gen. xvii. 


CHAP. XI.] 


ISATAH, 


103 


And a fruitful Sprout shall grow up from his roots. 
2 And the Spirit of Jehovah shall rest upon him ; 
The Spirit of wisdom and discernment ; 


6; and, as here, specially of the Re- 
deemer, Micah v. 1. ™2¥, Branch, is 
the term by which he is more usually 
designated, comp. chap. iv. 2; but 19h, 
and 71%}, better suit the present con- 
nexion. The former is related to the 


Arab, poh Syr. poms, a slender, 


flexible shoot or twig; from js, to 


wave, swing to and fro; the latter is 
derived from 12), fo view with attention, 
_ attract notice by the display of verdure, 
be verdant, like a young branch, or 


sprout. Comp. the Arab. Ὁ, germina 


sua ostendit terra; and 3» lete viruit 


arbor. Aquila ἀκρέμονα ; Theod. and 
Symm. βλαστός ; the LXX. ἄνθος .--- 
232 is properly what remains in the 
earth of the trunk of a tree that has 


been felled. Comp. ξ to cut off; 
go> a stump, or the remaining part 


of apalm tree. Aquila., Theod., Symm. 
κορμός. The parallel rey proves it to 
mean the part which remains, and not 
that which is cut off with its branches. 
Comp. Job xiv. 8; Isa. xl. 24. The 
idea of a hewn tree having been 
suggested by the use of the terms 
py7a and FP, at the conclusion of the 
preceding chapter, the image is em- 
ployed to set forth the reduced and 
lowly condition of the house of David 
at the time of Messiah’s birth. The 
tree had been cut down in a political 
point of view, but it had not been 
rooted up; the family had not become 
extinct. Further to indicate its mean 
condition, the name of David, which 
would have suggested notions of dig- 
nity and splendour, is suppressed, and 
that of his father Jesse is employed, 
which conveys the ideas of rustic 
simplicity and obscurity. The last 
historical notices which we have of 
this family are from the time of 
Domitian, who, jealous of the king 
whom the Jews still expected to arise 
from it, ordered all that belonged to it 


to be put to death. Euseb. Hist. 
Eccles. lib. iii. c. 19, 20. 
2. This verse contains a description 
of the supernatural endowments to be 
-conferred upon-the human nature of 
our Lord, by the agency of the Holy 
Spirit —y7r 7, elsewhere OX 1, 7 
wp, and κατ᾽ ἐξοχὴν Mm, the Great, 
Preeminent, Uncreated Spirit, whose 
energy, like that of the wind, is invi- 
sible, John iii. 8; who cherished, and 
gave motion and order to the chaotic 
mass at the creation, and still vivifies 
the universe, Gen. i. 2; Ps. civ. 30; 
the author of all that is holy, good, or 
excellent in man, ΡΒ. li. 12, exliii. 10. 
To him is specially ascribed the im- 
partation of extraordinary gifts and 
influences, by which men were qualified 
for performing what they never could 
have effected by mere natural power, 
Exod, xxxi. 3, xxxy. 31; Judg. iii. 10, 
vi. 34, &c.; Numb. xxiv. 2; 1 Sam. x. 
10. He is here represented as the 
author of that plenitude of Divine 
influence by which the Messiah was 
fitted for discharging the duties of 
his great undertaking. Comp. Luke 
iv. 1, Ἰησοῦς δὲ πνεῦματος ἁγίου πλήρης 5 
John ili. 34, οὐ γὰρ ἐκ μέτρου δίδωσιν 
6 Θεὸς τὸ πνεῦμα.---ἰ 12, from ™3, fo 
come down upon a person, or place, so as 
to remain, to rest, continue. Thus the 


Syr. }7a20 «03222; and to this 


force of the verb pointed reference 
seems to be had John i. 33, τὸ 
πνεῦμα καταβαῖνον καὶ pevov.— 
nmomom, &c. is in apposition with 
mmm, and does not mean a wise, 
prudent spirit, &c., but the Spirit by 
whom the qualities of wisdom, pru- 
dence, &c., were to be imparted. The 
genitive is that of cause, not of pos- 
session; and 1 is used throughout in 
a personal sense, The qualities speci- 
fied are grouped in pairs, which, 
though not susceptible of perfect dis- 
tinction, nevertheless sufficiently vary 
in point of general signification, to 
admit of distinct consideration. Ac- 
cording to Hebrew usage, 7927, wisdom, 
is most extensive in its import, com- 


104 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XI. 


The Spirit of counsel and might ; 
The Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of Jehovah. 
3 So that he shall be of quick perception in regard to the fear of 


Jehovah ; 


prehending the whole circle of mental 
endowments and moral excellences by 
which it is possible for intelligent 
beings to be distinguished. The 
primary idea conveyed by the root 


Don » is that of solid, practical 


=v) 


knowledge—to be possessed of clear, 
definite, adequate, and influential con- 
ceptions relative to the nature of 
objects, and so capable of judging and 
pronouncing rightly concerning them. 
In Arab. the idea of giving judgment 
as the result of such knowledge, is 


predominant; hence rs a judges 


phe decision, sentence; though este 


signifies gui res solide, et cum judicio 
agit, and is particularly used of a 
physician, on account of his skill in 
judging of diseases, and knowing what 
to apply for their removal. Comp. 
Sob xin, 12913, V6; xi. 5, v.98, +9; 
XXVili. 28, xxxii. 7,9. “72 differs from 
the preceding only as it conveys the 
idea of discernment, or discrimination ; 
judgment formed by the comparison 
of things which differ, and a just ap- 
preciation of the points of difference. 
It is derived from 73, ¢o separate, dis- 


tinguish; Avab. we med. Je. fo be 


distinct, separate. The two terms are 
frequently coupled together ; Job 
evan 12, 20,28; Prov.d. 2, iv.5, 7; 
viii. 12, 14; as are 927, and MIA, 
another derivative from the same 
root.—Tz¥, counsel, (comp. FP", chap. ix. 
5,) plan, scheme, purpose, and, by impli- 
cation, the faculty of wisely and ad- 
visedly laying a foundation for future 
action. It is combined with ΤᾺΣ, 
might, the power adequate for carry- 
ing purposes into execution. Viewed 
merely as a physical quality, wisdom 
is preferred to it, Eccles. ix. 16; but 
regarded as a moral quality they are 
equal. In exercise it gives effect to 
the decisions of wisdom. ‘The idea of 
military prowess is rejected by Gese- 
nius and Hengstenberg, as totally un- 


suitable to the peaceable character of 
the Messiah ; but as he is also repre- 
sented in the character of a mighty 
warrior, Ps. xlv. 3, 4, ex. 1—3; Isa. 
lxiii. 1—6 ; it is not wholly to be ex- 
cluded.—nv1, knowledge, equally with 
nxy, fear, is in construction with 77. 
Both qualities ere so closely related to 
each other, that where only one of 
them is mentioned the other is under- 
stood. By the former is meant a 
practical acquaintance with the cha- 
racter and will of God; by the latter, 
the exercise of all those feelings and 
dispositions which right views of the 
Divinecharacter and will are calculated 
to produce. It is very often put for 
the whole of true religion; Job iv. 6, 
xv. 4; Ps. xix. 9 (Hebr. 10), cxxviii.1,435 
Proy. xiv. 26; and 7zdoc. The charismata 
here enumerated are for the most part 
similarly classified, Prov. vill. 12—14. 

3. wmm the LXX. render ἐμπλήσει 
ἀυτὸν πνεῦμα φόβου Θεοῦ; the Vulg. 
replebit eum spiritus timoris Domini $ 
Saad. aay re inspirabit euit, which 


Michaelis and others adopt ; but no in- 
stance can be adduced in support of 
this rendering. Gesenius and Hitzig 
translate, His delight shall be, which 
gives a good sense, but is lable to the 
same objection ; none of the examplés 
appealed to being fairly in point. 
Besides, it does not so well agree with 
the following clauses of the verse, as 
that which retains the idea of smelling. 


Arab. εὺν captare auram, naribus 


attrahere, odorem, preesertim gratum. 
Schultens, Comm. in Job xxxix. 25, 
where it is said of the war-horse, 
many My PTV, he smelleth the battle 
from far,’”’ in reference to the instine- 
tive sense which he has of its approach. 
As none of the senses in animals is 
more acute than that of smell, and in 
the ruder states of human existence 
it is almost incredibly so in man, it 
came metaphorically to denote acute- 
ness of perception, clear mental apprehen- 
sion and intuitive sagacity. Literally 


= 


CHAP. XI. | 


ISAIAH. 


105 


And he shall not judge by the sight of his eyes, 
Nor decide by the hearing of his ears: 
4 But with righteousness shall he judge the poor, 
And decide with equity for the meek of the earth ; 
And he shall smite the earth with the rod of his mouth, 
And with the breath of his lips shall he slay the wicked. 


' the passage would read, He shall be 
_-guick-scented in reference to the fear of 


Jehovah, i.e. Thus richly endowed with 
supernatural gifts, he shall not need 
to form his judgments respecting 
matters of religion, as others do, by 
observation or report, but shall possess 
an acute and perfect discernment, by 
which he shall intuitively perceive 
their nature and relations, and give 
his decisions accordingly. For the 
fulfilment, see Matt. ix. 4, xi. 27, xxii. 
18; Mark ii. 8 ; John ii. 24, 25; Rev. 
li. 2, 9, 13, 23, &c.—The 1 is used 
ἐκβατικῶς, and points out the result 
of the conferment of the spiritual 
gifts. 

4, The parallelisms in this verse are 
most complete: each part correspond- 
ing to each. Between 020 and m3, 
little difference exists ; only the latter, 
followed by %, implies carrying the 
sentence into execution for the benefit 
of those in whose favour it has been 
given. Lowth’s version, He shall work 
conviction in the meek, even were it 
borne out on grammatical principles, 
destroys the unity of the sense. In 
oy, respect is had more to external 
circumstances, or to a state of spiritual 
destitution ; in FI8°LY, to disposition 
of mind—the result of sanctified 
affliction. Comp. Ps. Ixxii. 4, 12, 13; 
Is.1xi. 1 ; Zech. x1. 7; of πτωχοί, Luke vi. 
20 ; οἱ πτωχοὶ τῷ πνεῦματι, Matt. v. 3; 
οἱ πρᾳεῖς, Υ. δ ; comp. ΧΙ. ὃ ; James ii. 5. 
The attention of our Saviour was 
particularly directed to the condition 
of the poor, both in spirit and outward 
circumstances ; and such chiefly, in 
every age, have reaped the glorious 
benefits of the Gospel—Houbigant’s 
conjecture, that for 02%, rod, we should 
read ni, blast, which Lowth adopts, 
is to be rejected, not only on the 
ground that no such word exists in 
the Hebrew language, but also on 
account of the adaptation of 12%, rod, 


to express, in the usual style of Isaiah, 
the severity of the punishment to be 
inflicted. Its being referred to the 
mouth, ὙΒ 33, is founded on the idea 
of the punishment being ordered or 
denounced, just as the command to slay 
the wicked is, in the other member of 
the parallelism, called ynav 1, {6 
breath of his lips. Thus also the Arab. 


lac , Zaculus, the Kamoos explains by 
wal, castigation, and ων» tongue. 


Comp. Job xv. 30. The idea of blast, 
or wind, is totally foreign to the pas- 
sage, as is also that of the preaching 
of the Gospel, which some commen- 
tators have introduced into it. Comp. 
Heb. iv. 12 ; Rev. i. 16, xix. 15, where 
the sword, as an instrument of punish- 
ment, is likewise spoken of in con- 
nexion with the mouth.—f, parallel 
with »w, is put by metonymy for ¢he 
inhabitants of the earth, and by impli- 
cation, the ungodly, as κόσμος frequently 
signifies in the N. T.—vv7 is a collec- 
tive noun, like 6 dvopos, 2 Thess. ii. 8, 
where the words of Isaiah are supposed 
to be alluded to. What confirms this 
supposition, is the construction put 
upon the prophecy in the Targ. : m2 
xy Dinar, he will slay the wicked Ar- 
milus. This name is given by the 
Jews to a notoriously flagitious cha- 
racter who, according to the state- 
ments of their writers, is to appear 
at Rome, and kill Messiah, the son of 
Joseph, but is to be himself slain by 
Messiah, the son of David. See Bux- 
torf. Lex. Chald. iz voc. and Eisen- 
menger’s Entdecktes Judenthum, Th. 
ii. pp. 705—715. The text in Isaiah 
obviously implies, that preeminence 
in wickedness should characterise 
those on whom, as his enemies, Christ 
would execute extreme punishment. 
This also is the import of the empha- 
tic terms, 6 ἄνθρωπος τῆς ἁμαρτίας, ὁ 


106 ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XI. 


5 And righteousness shall be the girdle of his loins, 
And faithfulness the girdle of his reins. 
6 Then shall the wolf dwell with the lamb, 
And the leopard lie down with the kid ; 
The calf also, and the young lion, and the fatling shall be together, 
And a little child shall lead them. 


vids τῆς ἀπωλείας, 2 Thess. ii. 3, and 
of the whole description contaimed in 
the following verses. 

5. 772 relates to the claims of justice, 
as bearing upon actions; 722x7 to 
those of ¢ruth in keeping promises. 
The two terms, or their synonymes, 
frequently occur together, Deut. xxxii. 
4; Ps..cxix. 75, 138; Prov. xii: 17.— 
Lowth, misled by the LXX.and other 
ancient versions, which frequently 
introduce variations where there is 
none in the original, alters the second 
ny into Wn, Gesenius has shewn, by 
a great number of instances, that in 
the book of Isaiah the same word is 
repeated in the second member of a 
parallelism. Symm. has περίζωμα in 
both cases. To be girded, denotes 
strength and readiness for action. See 
chap. v. 27; Job. xxxviii. 3. 

6. From this verse to the ninth in- 
clusive, the prophet furnishes a de- 
scription of the peace and happiness 
to be enjoyed under the reign of Mes- 
siah, which, for boldness and exquisite 
choice of imagery, far surpasses the 
sublimest passages in which the clas- 
sical poets celebrate the renewal of 
the golden age; indeed, nothing can 
exceed in beauty the scene here 
depicted. Numerous passages δά- 
duced by Lowth and Gesenius from 
Virgil, Horace, Theocritus, Ferdoosi, 
Ibn Onein, as also from the Zenda- 
vesta, and the Sibylline Oracles, clearly 
establish the fact of the prevalence of 
such figurative language ; and render 
in the highest degree improbable the 
interpretation of Hengstenberg, and 
some other expositors, who consider 
Isaiah to be literally predicting an 
entire change in the nature of the 
brute creation, and its restoration to 
its primeval state before the fall. Of 
the different passages that occur in 
heathen poets, the most apposite is 
that of Claudian :— 


“Securum blandi leporem fovere mo- 
lossi 
Vicinumquelupo prebuitagna latus. 
Concordes varia ludunt cum tigride 
dame 
Marsalam cervi non timuere jubam.” 
Prol. 11. de Rapt. Proserp. 


By the animals specified are meant 
persons reserabling them in their 
natural dispositions and habits; and 
by their living and feeding together 
in peace and harmony is adumbrated 
that state of true union, fellowship, 
and peace, which those enjoy who 
submit to the reign of the Redeemer, 
and conform to the laws of his king- 
dom. To look for the accomplishment 
of the prophecy in the experience and 
conduct of such as possess merely the 
name of Christians, or to refer its ful- 
filment to some future day, because so 
many wars, bickerings, and conten- 
tions, have hitherto more or less 
obtained among nations or commu- 
nities professedly Christian, would be 
to torture the passage in order to 
make it speak a language foreign to 
its spirit and design. It has been 
verified in every age, in proportion to 
the extent in which genuine Christi- 
anity has exerted its influence. Cha- 
racters the most ferocious have been 
subdued; and those who had been 
living in malice and envy, hateful and 
hating one another, have “ put en as 
the elect of God, holy and beloved, 
bowels of mercies, kindness, humble- 
ness of mind, meekness, long-suffering, 
forbearing one another, and forgiving 
one another,” Col. iii. 12,13. For the 
exhibition of contrary tempers and 
dispositions, the religion of the Son of 
God is in nowise answerable. So far 
as any indulge in them, they afford 
melancholy evidence, that they are 
influenced by principles uncongenial 
with the spirit of the Divine kingdom. 


CHAP. XI.] 


ISAIAH. 


107 


7 The heifer also, and the she-bear shall feed ; 

Their young ones shall lie down together ; 

And the lion shall eat straw like the ox. 
8 Yea, the suckling shall play at the hole of the asp; 

And the weanling shall lay his hand on the den of the basilisk. 
9 They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain; 

For the earth shall be full of the knowledge of Jehovah, 


As the waters cover the sea. 


10 And it shall come to pass in that day, 


—The Ὑ in 1} connects in point of 
time, what follows with the preceding 
context. There is a singular beauty 
in the manner in which the young lion 
is introduced into the group between 
the calf and the futling. ὙΠ is em- 
phatic. 

7, 8. 315 an epicenic noun.— 17? is 
understood after 4ry17, and would 
have been expressed, but for its form- 
ing the first word of the following 
clause.—ruvy, the Pilp. of yyw, to 
stroke, to rub gently with the hand; then 
as here, generally, ¢o caress, play 
with the hand, find delight in thus play- 


ing.—p2, Arab. Ba Coluber Beten, an 


asp, or kind of serpent, whose poison 
kills almost instantaneously; in all 
probability, the species found by Has- 
selquist on the island of Cyprus, and 
called dom by the modern Greeks. 
It is seldom more than a foot in 
length, but in thickness resembles 
the arm of a man. Bochart, tom. iii. 
Ῥ. 380, &c. ; Michaelis, Supplem. No, 
2100. The Greek Πύθων, Python, is 
doubtless a derivative from this root. 
--ἰ τυ Ὁ, ὦ light-hole, or hole for the ad- 
mission of light, from ix, dight— 753, 
Aq. βασιλίσκος, Vulg. regulus, the 
basilisk; according to Michaelis, the 
Cerast or horned serpent—a small 
viper, little more than a foot in length; 
so called from the feelers which are 
protruded from its head, while it lies 
hid in the sand. It is exceedingly 
venomous. Comp. chap. lix. 5; Jer. 
viii. 17 ; Prov. xxiii. 32; and Is. xiv. 
29, where the cognate ΘῈΣ occurs. In 
most of these passages, U2 is used 
along with it.—79, a ἅπαξ Ney. Arab. 


uss to lead or shew the way, by point- 


ing with the hand; hence in Heb. ¢o 
stretch forth the hand. 

9. What was obviously implied in the 
preceding description is now expressly 
stated, and the cause of the wonderful 
change specified : the extension of the 
knowledge of Jehovah. This latter 
circumstance further shews that the 
language of the description is figura- 
tive. From the correlative terms, 
OT? W752 and jw, it is manifest, the 
latter cannot be interpreted of the 
land of Canaan, but must be taken in 
its full latitude of signification. LXX. 
ἡ σύμπασα. Kimchi himself felt that 
by mountain, more was meant than the 
literal Zion, and he accordingly ex- 
plains it of the whole land of Israel; 
but the phrase here employed denotes, 
in reference to the period of the New 
Covenant, the Church of God as exist- 
ing throughout the earth; the locality, 
so to speak, in which the scene just 
described should be realized. See 
chap. ii. 3; Ps. lxxxvii. 1 ; Is. lvi. 7.— 
Mmny WI is equivalent to my ny7, 
As an Infinitive, it more definitely 
marks the subjective nature of the 
knowledge intended, and the activity 
of mind with which it is cherished. 
Comp. for the form, Hab. iii. 13 ; and 
for the sense, Jer. ix. 24, xxxi. 34; 
Dan. xii. 4; John xvii. 3; 2 Pet. i. 2, 
3.—Dd, the sea, by metonymy for the 
bed of the sea; ὃ very expressive 
figure, denoting not only that no por- 
tion of the inhabited globe shall be 
destitute of the true knowledge of 
God, but that this knowledge shall 
be extensive and profound. 

10. The benefits of Messiah’s reign 
were not to be restricted to the Jews, 
but to be extended among the Gen- 
tiles, by whom they would be em- 


108 ISATAH. 


That to the Root of Jesse, who shall stand as a banner to the 


people, 
Shall the nations repair ; 


And the place of his rest shall be glorious. 
11 And it shall come to pass in that day, 
That Jehovah shall stretch forth his hand the second time, 


braced, and their glorious results 
exhibited.» and 0%3 are not here 
identical as to subject. By the former, 
the ¢ribes of God’s ancient people are 
meant; by the latter, the zations that 
had been strangers from the common- 
wealth of Israel. That the plural, as 
well as the singular form of ody, has 
this restrictive acceptation, see chap. 
ili. 13, and the passages there referred 
to. For the contrast, comp. chap. 
xlix. 6; Luke xxiv. 47; John x. 16; 
Acts iii. 25, 26.—% ww, the Nomin. 
absol.— aw, Root, is here equivalent 
to ὙΠ and 182, ver. 1, denoting, not 
that which strikes downward into the 
ground, but that which sprouts up or 
springs from the root, comp. Is. liii. 2 ; 
Rey. v. 5, xxii. 16.—03, a signal of 
rendezvous, see chap. v. 26.—>8 01, 
signifies to go or repair to for advice, 
protection, and assistance. See chap. 
viii. 19. It is never used in reference 
to application to men for aid; but 
always respects religious application, 
either to the true God, to an idol sup- 
posed to be a god, or to those who 
pretended to give the responses of 
false deities. According to the uni- 
form doctrine of Scripture, Jehovah 
alone is the legitimate object of such 
application: so that the present use 
of the phrase identifies the Messiah 
with Jehovah. The meaning of the 
prophet is, that the heathen would 
turn away from every idol and every 
false ground of confidence, and apply 
to the Messiah alone for salvation. 
The version of the LXX. ἐπ᾽ αὐτῷ 
ἔθνη ἐλπιοῦσι, gives the sense, and is 
therefore quoted by Paul, Rom. xv. 12, 
in proof of the doctrine, that the 
Gentiles were to be converted to 
Christ.—22 ingy2 AMM, lit. and the 
place of his rest shall be glory; but the 
substantive, 733, stands adjectively 
for glorious,—an idiom not uncommon 
in Hebrew, The pronominal reference 


in in) is BW, personally considered. 
mm denotes not merely rest, quiet, 
tranquillity, but also the locality in 
which such rest is enjoyed, see Numb. 
x. 33; Ps. exxxii. 14, where the term 
is synonymous with 2019, dwelling, or 
habitation, ver.13. Prefixed as forma- 
tive of verbal nouns, Ὁ very frequently 
expresses the place where the import 
of the verb is realized, as Ν 2, 1279, 
xzia, m1, &e. The place of Messiah’s 
rest is his Church, those among whom 
he dwells, and to whom he vouchsafes 
the experience of his presence, Matt. 
xviii. 20. Michaelis points the word, 
inqy2, which is found in one of De 
Rossi’s MSS., and has been in another 
originally, and renders, Ais gifts > wn- 
derstanding thereby the presents that 
should be brought to him; but the 
other interpretation is best supported. 
Jerome’s translation : e¢ erit sepulcrum 
ejus gloriosum, which he certainly did 
not adopt from his Jewish teacher, is 
founded on a complete misconception 
of the meaning of the passage, but 
has furnished a famous text from 
which to expatiate on the merits of 
going on pilgrimage to what is called 
the Holy Sepulchre.—With respect to 
the glorious condition of the Church, 
at the period here referred to, see 
chap. iv. 5. 

11. The commencement of a distinct 
prophecy relative to the restoration 
of the Jews. Isaiah, having in pro- 
phetic vision contemplated the future 
Deliverer, and the wide extension of 
the glorious blessings of his reign, has 
his thoughts directed to other events 
that were closely connected with the 
period which he had just described, 
but were to precede it, and conse- 
quently, interposed between it and 
that at which he lived. Previous to 
the appearance of the Messiah, the 
Jews were to be carried into captivity, 
not only into Babylon, but also into 


[CHAP. XI. 


CHAP. XI.] 


ISATAH. 


109 


To recover the remnant of his people, that remaineth, 
From Assyria and from Egypt, 


other countries, and their land was to 
be left in a state of desolation. But 
in order that they might be in a con- 
dition either to receive or reject him, 
agreeably to ancient prophecy, it was 
necessary that they should again in- 
habit Judea ; that their temple should 
be rebuilt ; and their ecclesiastical 
polity re-established. That it is this, 
and not any restoration still future, 
the prophet here describes appears: 
First, because such is the more natural 
construction of the passage, and is 
unencumbered with any of the diffi- 
culties which necessarily clog the 
other interpretations: Secondly, be- 
cause not only have Ephraim and Judah 
amalgamated, but all hostility between 
the tribes has long since ceased: 
Thirdly, becausethe nationsmentioned 
in the prophecy no longer exist; and 
to expound them allegorically, or to 
subject to such a mode of exposition 
the entire prediction, is utterly at 
variance with sound and consistent 
principles of prophetical exegesis. 

To the proposed interpretation no 
valid objection can be derived from 
the formula x77 O13, [nz that day; since 
it is often used with great latitude of 
meaning. As employed in ver. 10, it 
is not to be restricted to the con- 
cluding words of the previous pro- 
phecy, but must be understood as 
connecting with ver. 1, and thus mark- 
ing a period which was to succeed the 
Assyrian catastrophe. Jn or during 
this period, the predicted restoration 
was to be effectedBefore 1” supply 
τύ πὴ} signifies to set upright ; to 
raise from circumstances of captivity 
or depression ; fo redeem, and so bring 
the persons thus liberated into a 
peculiar relation to their deliverer, 
whom they are bound to love and 
serve.—™2, the second time, is not 
connected with 722, to recover, but 
with 11 18, ¢o stretch forth his hand ; 
and refers not to any previous recovery 
of the Hebrews from the various 
countries here specified, but to the 
illustrious deliverance of their an- 
cestors from Egypt in the time of 
Moses. To this event 732 is applied, 


Exod. xv. 16; Deut. xxxii. 6, and 
freq. Comp. ver. 16.— x, Assyria, and 
D0, Lgypt, are first mentioned be- 
cause they were the most powerful 
states known to the Jews; and perhaps 
also because the greatest number of 
captives would be found within their 
geographical boundaries. From the 
former of these countries the de- 
scendants both of Israel and Judah 
returned under Cyrus. Many have, 
indeed, endeavoured to shew, that 
only those of the latter were restored, 
and that the ten tribes still separately 
exist somewhere on the face of the 
globe: but their attempts have failed, 
as every attempt must that would 
contravene the meaning of such scrip- 
tures as the following: Jer. xxxi. 31 
—34, compared with Heb. viii. 6—13, 
Xxxill. 7—16; Ezek. xxxvii. 11—28. 
Into Egypt the Jews were first carried 
as slaves in the reign of Rehoboam, 
2 Chron. xii. 8; others no doubt ac- 
companied Jehoahaz when conveyed 
thither by Pharaoh-Necho, 2 Chron. 
xxxvi. 4; great numbers fled thither 
after the invasion by Nebuchadnezzar, 
2 Kings xxv. 26 ; Jer. xli. 16, xliv. 1; 
and in the time of the Ptolemies many 
thousands were resident there, either 
as slaves, or in a state of voluntary 
exile, sometimes well treated, and 
sometimes treated with the utmost 
cruelty. After the establishment of 
Jewish independence, B.c. 143, and 
especially during the civil commotions 
which ensued in Egypt, many of them 
embraced the opportunity afforded 
them to return to Palestine ; and to 
this period we are to refer the ful- 
filment of the prediction in the text — 
bine, Pathros, follows after Egypt, 
being the southern or upper part of 
that country, called by the Greeks and 
Romans Thebais, and by the Arabs 


δάσο, Said. The name in the native 


Coptic is TIEGO¥ PHC, Pethoures, 


or without the article, ΘΟ PHC; 


Thoures, “the South” The LXX. 
have here Βαβυλωνία; but in Jer. 


ἂν 


110 


ΙΒΑΤΙΑΗ. 


[CHAP. 


And from Pathros, and from Cush, and from Elam, 
And from Shinar, and from Hamath, 
And from the regions of the sea. 
12 Yea, he shall raise a banner to the nations, 
And shall gather the outcasts of Israel, 


xliv. 1, Παθοῦρης, and Ezek. xxix. 14, 
Παθωρῆς, in both of which the original 
word is preserved. It was the primi- 
tive country of the Egyptians, Ezek. 
xxix. 14, and is mentioned as distinct 
from Egypt by Greek and Roman 
writers, as it is by Isaiah and Jeremiah. 
In the Genealogical Table of nations, 
Gen. x., under the Mitzraim division 
of the Hamites, are DO NB, by whom 
are meant the inhabitants of the 
same territory.—3, Cush, or Ethiopia, 


Ambar. Tiff: lay to the south of 


Pathros, and, according to Diod. Sic. 
111. 3, was peopled from the latter 
country—see on chap. xvill. 1; and 
partly on the east side of the Red 
Sea. It appears to be employed here 
in its most comprehensive acceptation. 
The Targum has 117, Hodu, “ India,” 
which embraced the southern and 
eastern parts of Arabia, and, as it 
would seem, anciently stretched across 
towards the Caspian Sea, in the neigh- 
bourhood of which we find a Cusf, 
Gen. 11.13. Comp. the prop. name of 
Cushan Rishathaim, a king of Mesopo- 
tamia, Judg. 111. 8, 10, and Cuth, Cuthah, 
2 Kings xvii. 24, 30.—Next to the 
Oriental Cush, Isaiah takes up the 
adjacent country of Ory, Ham, or 
Elymais, which was properly a pro- 
vince of Persia, lying along the Persian 
Gulf, but most probably including 
here Susiana, if not the whole of 
Persia, since we find it mentioned by 
the prophets in connexion with Baby- 
lonia, Assyria, and Media.—To the 
west of Elam lay w2, Shinar, which 
comprehended Babylonia and Mesopo- 
tamia, and thus connected Elam and 
Assyria, already mentioned, with nn, 
Hamath, the last of the countries 
specifically named. For this country, 
see chap. x. 9.—D°7 "x, and frequently 
Dex, not strictly or exclusively islands, 
but maritime regions, whether islands, 
sea-coasts, or countries circumscribed, 
or bounded by the sea. In some 


instances the term has necessarily the 
former signification, as Esth. x.1; Jer. 
xlvii. 4; but most frequently it is 
employed to denote the maritime 
countries situated on the Mediter- 
ranean, including Greece, Italy, and 
other regions in the remote west from 
Palestine, Gen. x. 5; Ps. lxxii. 10; Is. 
xxiv. 15, xli. 5; Jer. xxv. 22. The 


word is derived from ™x, Arab. uss! : 


to dwell, lodge, costes dwelling, habita- 


tion. Comp. m2 ™3, the same.— 
Owing to the proximity of most of 
the countries specified by the prophet, 
it is extremely probable that the Jews 
who were carried away captive, would 
be sold as slaves from one to another 
of them, or become subject to future 
migrations, according as the inhabit- 
ants were disturbed by hostile in- 
vasions. ΑΒ it respects the west, we 
learn from Joel iii. 4—6, that the 
Pheenicians sold them to the Greeks ; 
and to this slave trade further refer- 
ence is distinctly made, Ezek. xvii. 13. 
During the Macedonian and Roman 
conquests, Divine Providence opened 
a way for the return of the Jews in 
the west to their own land ; and the 
close relations in which their state 
afterwards stood to Rome still more 
favoured such return. Comp. Zech. 
x. 9—12. 

12, 039 Ὁ2 XD) isnot to be explained 
by 02? 129, ver. 10, but by the use of 
the identical phrase, chap. v. 26, where 
it is employed in its military import 
of summoning armies to certain points 
ofattack. While the different nations 
were engaged in mutual conflict, God 
would afford his people opportunities 
of making their escape. This verse 
only expresses in different language 
the prediction contained in the pre- 
ceding. The repetition indicates 
certainty. O17) and niz2, though of 
different genders, are not intended to 
mark the male and female portion of 


CHAP. ΧΙ.]} 


ISATAH, 


111 


And collect the dispersed of Judah, 
From the four extremities of the earth. 
13 Then shall the jealousy of Ephraim depart, 
And the hostile in Judah be cut off ; 
Ephraim shall not be jealous of Judah, 
And Judah shall not be hostile to Ephraim. 
14 But they shall pounce upon the shoulders of the Philistines on 


the west; 


Together shall they plunder the sons of the east ; 


the population, but merely express 
totality. Jsrael and Judah are used 
distinctively of the descendants of 
those who composed the two king- 
doms.—ni523, lit. wings, but as the 


Arab. Wi 9 signifies fo surround, 
bound, and 33S ; KAS > Latus, and 


tractus rei ; Plaga regionis ; it 1s evi- 
dently employed to express the idea 
of boundaries, or extreme and distant 
regions. Comp. Job xxxvil. 3, Xxxviil. 
13, and Ezek. vii. 2, in which last 
passage and the present, the numeral 
Dax, four, is applied to the cardinal 
points whence come the four winds, 
Ezek. xxxvil. 9; Matt. xxiv. 31; and 
to which correspond ai τέσσαρες γωνίαι 
τῆς γῆς, Rev. vil. 1, xx, 8. 

13. THT YS is the genitive of pos- 
session, not of object; and the mean- 
ing is, “those iz Judah,” or “those 
Jews, who are hostile to Ephraim.” 
There is thus a complete correspond- 
ence between the two members of 
the parallelism, which ig destroyed by 
the common mode of rendering the 
words. Comp. for similar instances 
of this mode of construction, 078 ‘73, 
Hos, xiii. 2; Die 228, Isa. xxix. 19 ; 
Gesen. Lehrg. p. 678; and for the 
sentiment, Ezek. xxxvii. 15—19. The 
two names of Zphraim and Judah 
stand, as in ver. 12, for the descend- 
ants of the ten tribes and the two 
tribes and a half respectively. From 
the time of the revolt a perpetual 
hatred and jealousy existed between 
these divisions; but on the return 
from the various captivities, they 
entirely ceased, and the tribal dis- 
tinction having since become entirely 


extinct, their revival is rendered im- 
possible. 


14, AND, Arab. nS > humerus, pro- 


perly a shoulder, but here used geogra- 
phically to denote the gradual rising 
or upper part of a country; or the 
heights and elevations along a sea 
coast. Comp. Numb. xxxiv. 11; Josh. 
xv. 8, 10, 11; where one of these 
heights is called JPY 793, “the shoulder 
of Ekron.” Saadias renders the word 


by 1b] , regions. For the Philistines, 


see chap. xiv. 29. These regions of 
the Philistines the recovered Hebrews 
would attack with the velocity with 
which a ravenous bird darts on its 
prey. Comp. Hab. i. 8—o77 2, the 
sons of the East, i. e. the inhabitants of 
Arabia Deserta, which stretched along 
the east of Palestine, and was, as it 
still is, inhabited by Bedoweens 


( kal!) or Nomades, who lived in 


tents, hence called Σκηνῆται, Scenites, 
and wandered over that large extent 
of country, according as pasturage was 
required for their cattle. Job i. 3. 
They often made predatory incursions 
into the adjacent countries, especially 
into Palestine, to the great annoyance 
of the inhabitants. See Judg. vi. 3; 
Job i. 15,17; Jer. xlix. 28, 29 ; Ezek. 
xxv. 4. For Edom, see chap. xxx1v, ; 
and for Moab, chap. xv.—o7 1789, lit. 
a sending or putting forth of their hand, 
but meaning, “the object of their at- 
tack.” —jray 23, the sons of Ammon, 1.6, 
the Ammonites, were descended from 
Lot, Gen. xix. 38, and inhabited the 
tract of country between the Jabbok 
and the Arnon, and extending a con- 


112 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XI, 


Edom and Moab shall be the object of their attack ; 
And the sons of Ammon shall obey them. 
15 Then shall Jehovah utterly destroy the tongue of the Egyptian 


sea, 


And shake his hand at the river, with his terrible wind, 
And smite it into seven streams, 
And cause them to go over dryshod. 


siderable way into Arabia. Rabbath, or 
Rabbath-Ammon, their capital city, 
afterwards called Philadelphia, and 
now Amman, was situated near the 
‘source of the Arnon. They were not 
attacked by the Hebrews on their way 
to Palestine ; but they ill repaid this 
indulgence by afterwards engaging in 
numerous hostile enterprises against 
them, on which account they were 
visited with Divine judgments, Ezek. 
xxv. 3, 10.—onynwn, their obedience, 
abstr. for coner. their subjects, i. 6. sub- 
ject to them. Root 2%, to hear, hearken 
so as to obey, to obey. 'The prophecy 
was fulfilled, as it regards the Philis- 
tines, when, after the persecution of 
Antiochus Epiphanes, the Asmoneans 
subjected several of their cities, and 
Jonathan acquired the government of 
the whole coast from Tyre to Egypt. 
Diod. Sic. Frag. xxxii. 16; Joseph. 
Antiq. xiii. 4. (4) ; 1 Macc. x. 69—89 ; 
and it received its accomplishment 
with respect to the other nations 
specified in this verse, in the time of 
Judas Maccabeeus, 1 Macc. v. 6—45, 
and Alexander Janneus, Joseph. Antiq. 
xiii. 13, (5) ; 14, &c. Jahn’s Heb. Com- 
mon. § 106. 

15. om, LXX. ἐρημώσει, Targ. BB, 
—as if they had read 79, fo eccicate; 
but Aq, Symm., and Theod., dvade- 
ματίσει, shall curse, or devote to de- 
struction, which is one of the signi- 
fications of the verb, The primary 


idea of DIN 


“τὸ 


Arab. a> prohibuit, pri- 


vatus fuit re; is to shut up, separate 
Jrom common use; hence, in Hiphil, ¢o 
consecrate, devote, devote to destruction, 


destroy utterly, Corp. the Arab. arm 
v. vill. perdidit, omnino perdidit, extir- 
pavit gentem, It is frequently used 


with respect to the entire destruction 
of the Canaanitish cities by the 


Hebrews.— ji, a tongue ; geographi- 
cally, like the Arab. oes a bay or 


gulf, from its resemblance to that 
member of the body ; just as, for the 
same reason, we speak of a tongue of 
land. Comp. Josh. xv. 2, 5, xviii. 19. 
-- ΟΞ Ὁ, otherwise called "Om, the 
sea of weeds, is the Red Sea, or Arabian 


Gulf, now called by the Arabs, = 
Adil, Bahr-el-Kolzum, and celebrated 


in the history of the Israelites, on 
account of their miraculous passage 
through its western or Herodpolitan 
branch. To that event allusion is 
here made ; but the language of the 
prophet being figurative, it is obvious 
we are not to understand him as 
pointing to any similar desiccation of 
the sea, but as predicting the removal 
of the most formidable barrier, which 
might lie in the way of the return of 
the Jews from Egypt. The destruction, 
which was begun by Nebuchadnezzar, 
was carried forward by the Persians ; 
by the Greeks under Alexander ; and 
was completed by the Romans after 
the battle of Actium, B.c. 30. Egypt 
then ceased to be an independent 
state—T "27, see chap. x. 32.—B 

120, the River, some understand the 
Nile ; but the appropriation of this 
term in common usage, to denote the 
Euphrates, decides in favour of the 
latter river.—inn Ova, LXX. ἐν πνεύ- 
ματι βιαίῳ, Vulg. in fortitudine spiritus 

ar oo Νὰ 

sui. Syriac, Mand} 9 13 pac l> by the 
strength of his wind. ὋΝ isa ἅπαξ dey. 
which some consider to be cognate 
with the Arab. ,lc, med. Je. sitivit ; 
but the preferable derivation is that 


of Abulwalid, who compares it with 
DN, /o be terrible: the Y and the δὶ being 


ry 


CHAP. XII.] 


ISATAH. 


113 


16 And there shall be a highway for the remnant of his people, 
Which shall remain—from Assyria— 


As there was unto Israel, 


In the day when he came up from the land of Egypt. 


interchanged. This interpretation Ge- 


senius and Rosenmiiller approve.— :° 


DT AID seven streams, i.e. completely 
into rivulets or torrents, and so dry 
up the Euphrates; the number seven 
being employed to express perfection 
or completeness. The appropriateness 
of the figure lies in the multitude of 
canals into which the Euphrates was 
divided ; and the meaning is, that the 
Babylonian power should be destroyed 
in order that the Jewish captives 
might return to their own land, 
Compare Rev. xvi. 12, where the same 
symbol is employed to denote the 
destruction of the Turkish power. 
The story related by Herodotus, that 


Cyrus caused the Gyndes, a river 
which falls into the Tigris, to be 
diverted into three hundred and sixty 
canals, and thus completely drained 
off its waters, though noticeable, has 
no real bearing upon the prophecy. 

16. The greatest number of the He- 
brews being in Babylon and the coun- 
tries about the Euphrates, the prophet 
concludes his description of the de- 
liverance, by comparing the facilities 
afforded for their return to 7D, a 
causey, or road, raised and properly 
made, so as to afford every conve- 
nience for public passage. For the 
fulfilment, see the books of Ezra and 
Nehemiah. 


--.----- 


CHAPTER XII. 


This chapter contains a hymn: of praise to be sung by the church on her 


restoration from captivity. 


It recognises the power and goodness of Jeho- 


vah, 1,2; the means of grace to be enjoyed under the new dispensation, 
3; the announcement of the Divine character and works to the Gentiles, 
4,5; and the special obligations of the Jews to gratitude and praise, 6. That 
this triumphal ode was suggested by that which Moses composed on 
occasion of the deliverance at the Red Sea, appears certain, from its close 
connexion with the concluding words of the previous chapter, and from the 
circumstance, that part of that song is expressly adopted, ver, 2, 


1 ΑΝΡ in that day thou shalt say: 


I will praise thee, O Jehovah. 


Though thou hast been angry with me, 
Thine anger is turned away, and thou comfortest me. 
2 Behold! God is my salvation ; 


1. The Divine anger had been 
poured out upon the Hebrews during 
their banishment, but, on their resto- 
ration, gave place to favour and con- 
solation, -Comp., chap. xl, 1, 2. 


2. ™ nyo Ἢ occurs precisely as 
here, Exod. xv. 2, and Ps. exviii. 14 ; 
as do also the following words, with 
the exception of m7; and there can 
be no doubt, that both in the Psalm 


114 ISATAH. 


I will trust, and not be afraid: 


[CHAP,. XII. 


For Jah [Jehovah] is my glory and song; 
He has even become my salvation. 
3 And ye shall draw water with joy from the fountains of salva- 


tion. 
4 And ye shall say in that day : 
Praise Jehovah; celebrate his 


and in Isaiah, they are borrowed from 
the Mosaic ode. n}21is properly the 
construct of 773, only retaining the 
Kametz, as in nny, mom, &c.; and 
would have been expressed in full, 
οι, but for the ’ in ™ following, with 
which it might easily have coalesced 
so as to form ™n73, which is indeed 
the reading of three MSS. One MS. 
reads NY}; two, and perhaps a third, 
with ten Samaritan MSS. exhibit it, 
Exod. xv. 2; and one, Ps. exvili. 14 ; 
and this is the reading of all the ver- 
sions in the present instance.—™, 
JAH, one of the peculiar names given 
to the Divine Being in the O. T., espe- 
cially in the Psalms. Cocceius and 
others derive it from 7%, to be comely, 
beautiful, excellent; but that it is an 
abbreviated ferm of the Tetragram- 
maton im seems certain from its 
varying with 17, (another abbreviated 
form of the same name,) at the end 
of compound proper names, as TY 
and wrt; only, in such cases, the 
Mappik is dropped. It also occurs in 
the formula 777, rendered by Theod. 
αἰνεῖτε τὸ ὄν. Some have considered 
it to be of Egyptian origin, and to 
correspond to ’Iaé, a8 occurring in 
some ancient writers; but Prof. Tho- 
luck has convincingly shewn, Bib. 
Repos. Jan. 1834, that in the authors 
referred to, the God of the Jews, and 
not any Egyptian deity, is the subject 
of discourse, and that there is no proof 
that the word Jao ever existed in the 
Egyptian language.—The word is want- 
ing in two MSS.; and 7\7 is omitted 
in eleven, originally in nine more, in 
two copies of the earliest printed 
Machzor, in two MSS. of the Targum ; 
and has nothing corresponding to it 
in the ancient versions. On these 
grounds, and as it does not occur in 
Exod. and the Ps., it is supposed to be 


name ; 


an interpolation from chap. xxvi. 4. 
It is, however, worthy of notice, that 
while Procopius places ΠῚΠῚ on the 
left margin of the text, he has on the 
right, Π ta κύριος, which probably 
stands for πάντες ta Κύριος, and in- 
dicates that all the MSS. consulted by 
Origen read JAH JEHOVAH. 

3. Whatever reference there is in 
this hymn to the temporal salvation 
which the Jews experienced, it cannot 
be doubted, that it was designed to 
excite in their minds an ardent desire 
after the greater deliverance to be 
wrought out by the Messiah. In this 
verse, the prophet interrupts the song 
in order to announce the happiness of 
those who should avail themselves of 
the privileges of the New Dispensa- 
tion. These privileges, and the bless- 
ings which they are intended to 
secure, are termed 7ywT ‘py, foun- 
tains of salvation. It is not at all 
improbable that there is here an 
allusion to the water miraculously 
supplied to the Israelites in the wil- 
derness ; which event was afterwards 
celebrated with great pomp, by golden 
vessels full of water being brought to 
the temple from the pool of Siloam, 
on the last day of the Feast of Taber- 
nacles. The blessings of salvation 
are frequently compared to “ water,” 
“ living water,” or “the water of life ;” 
Is. lv. 1; John iv. 10; Rev. xxii. 1, 17; 
on which account, our Saviour, on 
occasion of the festival just referred 
to, ‘“‘stood and cried, saying, If any 
man thirst, let him come unto me, 
and drink,” John vii.37. See Bloom- 
field on the passage. 

4, DWI ΝῊ not only signifies fo call 
upon, invoke the name of, but also, to 
laud or celebrate, give celebrity to any 
one by publishing his deeds, Ps. xlix. 
12; Is. xliv. 5. The most of this 


CHAP. ΣῈ: ISAIAH. 115 


Make known his deeds among the people ; 
Announce that his name is exalted! 
5 Sing to Jehovah, for he hath done a splendid deed ; 
It is made known through all the earth. 
6 Cry aloud, and shout, O inhabitress of Zion! 
For great in the midst of thee is the Holy One of Israel. 


verse is found verbatim in 1 Chron. has nvr, the Part. of Hoph. The 
xvi. 8; Ps. cv. 1. sense is the same ; and the connexion 

5. The Chethib, nv», pointed, ny, requires the word to be understood 
would be the Pual Part.; but the Keri optatively. 


~ 


CHAPTER XIII.—XIV. 23. 


Chapter xili.—xiv. 23, contains an entire prophecy respecting the destruction 
of Babylon by the Medes and Persians, which forms the first of a series of 
special predictions directed against foreign nations. So particular is this 
prophecy, and so exactly do its specifications tally with the circumstances 
connected with the fall of the Chaldean monarchy, that Rosenmiiller, Eich- 
horn, Bertholdt, Gesenius, Hitzig, and others, maintain it to be the pro- 
duction of some writer who lived during the captivity, when the hostility 
of the Medes, and the splendid successes of Cyrus, inspired the Jews with 
a conviction that their oppressor would soon be subdued; or, who lived 
after the return from Babylon, and, consequently, wrote after the events had 
taken place. It must, however, be evident to every one who coolly peruses 
what they have severally written in defence of these hypotheses, that their 
views are principally to be traced to disbelief of prophetic inspiration. 
They reason entirely κατ᾽ ἄνθρωπον. Because human sagacity could not by 
any possibility have anticipated, by nearly two hundred years, the par- 
ticular events in question, it follows, according to them, that the author 
must have flourished about the time they took place, if not indeed after 
they had happened. But who does not perceive the total repugnance of 
such a mode of argumentation to the doctrine of the Bible, relative to the 
supernatural influence which Isaiah and the other prophets enjoyed? The 
objections derived from supposed peculiarity of style, trains of ideas, &c. 
are trifling, and have for the most part been satisfactorily removed by 
Uhland, “ Vaticinium Jesaiz, cap. xiii. de excidio urbis et regni Babylonici, 
Jesaice prophet vindicatum.’”’ Tubing. 1798, 4to; Jahn in his Intro- 
duction ; Beckhaus in a work entitled, Ueber die Integritit der Prophe- 
tischen Schriften des Alten Bundes, Halle, 1796. The remarks of Michaelis, 
who lived to witness the commencement of the infidel attacks that have 


116 ISATAH. [CHAP. XIII. 


been made upon this portion of the book of Isaiah, are too valuable to be 
omitted in this place. Adverting to the views just noticed, he observes :— 
Those who have read Isaiah in Hebrew will not easily entertain such ideas, 
His style is so elegant, so magnificent, and so different from anything 
written about the time of the termination of the Babylonish captivity ; it 
is likewise so exempt from foreign words, which we so frequently meet 
with in the later writers; that to suppose his prophecies respecting 
Babylon to have been concocted in the first year of Cyrus must appear just 
as improbable as the hypothesis of Harduin, which he could not prevail 
upon the world to adopt, that the most beautiful of the Odes of Horace 
were the productions of barbarous monks in the Middle Ages. In the 
Babylonish captivity the grace and magnificence of the Hebrew language 
were entirely lost ; even Ezekiel, who lived during the captivity on the 
Chaboras, cannot be called graceful, any more than the courtier Daniel. 
Besides, in the former we discover a number of Chaldzisms in grammar ; 
and in the latter, foreign terms which never occur before his time. Ezra and 
Nehemiah wrote Hebrew ina style still vastly inferior ; while of the prophets 
Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi, there is not one who, in point of style, has 
the power of pleasing, notwithstanding the beautiful imagery which occurs 
in Zechariah. The prophecies of Isaiah, on the contrary, are, next to Job 
and the odes of Moses, the most splendid Hebrew monuments in existence ; 
they far surpass Jeremiah, the latest good writer which the Hebrews in- 
herited from happier times, and who lived during the captivity—a quality 
which is more obvious on perusing the original than it can possibly be made 
by any translation. Besides, the prophecies of Isaiah against Babylon are 
completely in the style of his other prophecies,—all of which it will not be 
maintained are supposititious,—and, indeed, may be said to form, with little 
abatement, the most splendid portions of his book. Another consideration 
must be taken into the account. The prophecy is of such a character that 
it could not have been forged in the year in which Cyrus took Babylon; for 
though Babylon was conquered, it was not destroyed, but continued to be 
a large and powerful city, which once and again rebelled against the 
Persians, under Darius Hystaspes, and Xerxes ; was chosen by Alexander 
the Great as his residence, and thus would almost have become the capital 
of the world, if that monarch had not abandoned himself to intoxication, 
to which he fell a victim. But it is predicted in this chapter (Isaiah xiii.) 
that the place where Babylon stood should be converted into a complete 
desert—a prophecy which received its fulfilment, indeed, but not till after 
the birth of Christ ; for it was only by slow degrees that this city reached 
the point of degradation to which it is now reduced. Certainly no person who 
might have forged a prediction in the first year of Cyrus would have 
introduced what we find vers. 19—22. Nor would a deceiver, even at the 
time when the Greek translation of Isaiah was executed, have predicted the 
complete desolation of Babylon ; for it still stood, though it had diminished 
from year to year.” —Deutsche Uebersetzung des Alten Testamentes, mit Anmer- 
kungen fiir Ungelehrte. 

The prophecy opens with the command of God to assemble the armies 


CHAP. XIII. ] 


ISATAH. 


117 


destined to attack Babylon, 2, 3; a description is given of their number, 
tumultuous noise, and actual approach, 4, 5 ; the consternation and destruc- 
tion which should follow are forcibly portrayed, 6—10 ; and Jehovah him- 
self is introduced denouncing the evils which he was to bring upon the city, 
and its ultimate and signal desolation, 11—22. 


1 THE SENTENCE OF BABYLON, which Isaiah the son of Amoz 


saw. 


1. kwo. The Targ. Aq., Syr., Je- 
rome, and most of the modern versions, 
derive this word from x3, in the sense 
of bearing a load, and render it onus, 
a burden; but Cocceius, Vitringa, 
Aurivillius, Michaelis, Rosenmiiller, 
Schroeder, Gesenius, Winer, and Hit- 
zig, following the LXX., ὅραμα, ὅρασις, 
ῥῆμα, λῆμμα, prefer the sense of efatum, 
oracle, sentence, frora δ), to raise the 
voice, to take up or utter any thing with 
the voice, Isa. iii. 7, xlii. 2, 11. This 
interpretation is confirmed by the 
occurrence of the phrase 711727 Nw, 
Zech. ix. 1, xii. 1; Mal. 1. 1; and the 
statement 77 xweaT m7, Is. xiv. 28. 
What has seemed to favour the former 
of these interpretations is the circum- 
stance that the term is commonly 
used in the titles of prophecies which 
are comminatory in their import, as 
ix, ae 1) xiv. 26) xv. 1, xvii: 1, xix. 1; 
xxi. 1, &c.; and Hengstenberg attempts 
to prove that it is never employed, 
either by Isaiah, or by any other of 
the sacred writers, in a different ac- 
ceptation, Christol. Zech. ix. 1; but it 
is clear from Proy, xxxi. 1, Zech. xii, 
1, that it is also used in a good sense. 
As, however, it is undeniably designed 
in prophetical inscriptions to convey 
the idea of a judicial declaration, the 
term sentence appears the best by 
which in most instances to render it, 
Prov. xxxi. 1 may also be translated, 
“ the sentences which his mother taught 
him ;” xt. being there used collec- 
tively for moral instructions, conveyed 
in the shape of sententious and pithy 
maxims,— 23, BABEL, BABYLON, some 


would derive from the Arab. Cols 
ub, Bab Bel, “the Gate” or “Court 


of Bel,” and compare the modern 


phrase, “Ottoman Porte;” but, ac- 
cording to Gen. xi. 9, it is to be referred 
to the root 723, ¢o confound, and is a 
contracted form of 3323, the second 
letter being dropped. See Gesen. 
Lehrg. p. 134, 869, and Lex. ἐμ voc. 
nionin, It was the celebrated capital 
of the Babylonian monarchy, and 
situated on the Euphrates, which 
divided it into two halves, near to the 
present village of Hillah, 32° 28’ N. 
latitude. By some its foundation is 
ascribed to Nimrod; by others, to 
Belus, to Semiramis, and even to 
Nebuchadnezzar; but there can be no 
doubt that the later monarchs only 
enlarged it. All the ancient accounts 
concur in supporting the propriety of 
the epithet Great, which we find 
applied to it, Dan. iv. 30. Bibl. Repos. 
vol. vii. p. 364. According to Hero- 
dotus, its walls were 480 stadia in 
circumference. Pliny and Solinus 
give it at sixty Roman miles, which, 
reckoning eight stadia to a mile, 
amounts to the same. Strabo’s esti- 
mate is 385 stadia; that of Diodorus, 
taken from Ctesias, 360, which is only 
five less than the estimate given by 
Clitarchus, who was there with Alex- 
ander the Great. Curtius gives it at 
368. These different accounts may be 
harmonized by supposing the first- 
mentioned writers to have included 
some outer enclosures of smaller 
moment, which the others have omit- 
ted. At the very lowest estimate, 
however, its size must have been 
enormous; and had it been densely 
built, its dimensions must have ex- 
ceeded all rational belief. But it 
appears from the statements of Cur- 
tius, and other writers, that the 
houses did not join each other, but 
that large spaces were left contiguous 


Ῥ 


118 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XIII. 


2 On the bare mountain erect the standard ; 


to the walls; while other spaces were 
appropriated to immense palaces, 
squares, gardens, &c. The walls, 
which consisted of burnt brick, 
cemented together by asphaltus, are 
said to have been 350 feet in height, 
and 87 in thickness ; and to have had 
250 towers and 100 gates of brass. 
Among the most remarkable buildings 
was the celebrated tower or temple of 
Belus, which is supposed to have been 
constructed on the ruins of that at- 
tempted to be built 120 years after 
the deluge, the remains of which, 
according to some, are still visible in 


the sre ays Birs Nimrood, described 


by modern travellers. It is 2,286 feet 
in circumference ; but all that remains 
in height, to the summit of the present 
tower, is only 235 feet. Babylon was 
the seat of science, especially astro- 
nomy; the centre of ancient idolatry ; 
the storehouse of wealth and magnifi- 
cence; and the asylum of all that was 
revolting in licentiousness and immo- 
rality. It attaimed its highest pitch 
of grandeur, soon after the year 8.6. 
623, when Nabopolassar destroyed the 
Assyrian, and founded the Chaldee- 
Babylonian empire. Under Nabonni- 
dus, B.c. 5388 or 539, agreeably to the 
prophecies of Isaiah, Jeremiah, and 
Daniel, it was taken, after a siege of 
two years, by Cyrus the Mede. In 
consequence of a rebellion of the 
Babylonians in the fourth or fifth year 
of Darius Hystaspes, that monarch 
ordered its hundred gates of brass to 
be taken away, and its walls to be 
lowered by two hundred cubits. 8.6, 
477, Xerxes plundered and destroyed 
the temple of Belus, and carried away 
the golden table and statues, which 
Darius had not ventured to touch, 
Alexander attempted in vain to restore 
the city to its former magnificence. 
From its conquest by Seleucus Ni- 
canor, B.C. 312, it fell still further 
into decay, especially in consequence 
of the erection of Seleucia on the 
Tigris, which that king made his 
residence. In the days of Strabo and 
Diodorus Siculus, it was little else 
than a desert; and Pausanias, who 
flourished in the first half of the 


second century, states that in his 
time nothing remained but the walls. 
In the fourth century these were 
partially repaired, in order to render 
it a park, in which the Persian Court 
might amuse itself in hunting wild 
beasts ; since which time little notice 
was comparatively taken of it, till 
Niebuhr, Rich, Ker Porter, Keppel, 
Buckingham, Mignan, and other mo- 
dern travellers who visited the region, 
furnished detailed accounts, all of 
which concur in representing its site 
as covered with nothing but heaps 
and traces of ruins—the horror of the 
surrounding Arabs, and frequented 
only by wild beasts, and birds of the 
most hateful description. A more 
extensive, or a more complete scene of 
devastation is nowhere to be seen. As 
he proceeded across it to visit the Birs 
Nimrood, Sir Robert Ker Porter re- 
marks, “ My eyes ranged on all sides, 
while crossing this vast barren tract, 
which assuredly had of old been 
covered, if not by closely compacted 
streets, at least with the parks and 
gardens attached to distinct mansions 
or divisions of this once imperial city ; 
but all was withered and gone, and 
comparatively level to the very hori- 
zon, till the object of my expedition 
presented itself, standing alone in the 
solitary waste, like the awful figure 
of Prophecy herself, pointing to the 
fulfilment of her word.”—Tyavels, vol. 
11. Ὁ. 306. See Robinson’s Calmet, and 
Winer’s Real-Worterbuch, articles, 
Babel, Babylon, Babylonia; Universal 
Hist. vol. iv. pp. 404—411; Rosen- 
miiller’s Biblical Geography, chap. viii. 

2.780) ὙΠ A bare mountain was 
best adapted for the erection of a 
standard, there being no trees to hide 
it from the view. ΠΕΣ is the Niph. 
participle of 758, fo scrape off, make 
naked, remove. Comp. ¥, a bare or 
naked hill, Is. xli. 18, xlix. 9. For the 
custom here referred to, see chap. v. 
26. Such a standard, or ensign, was 
designed to attract the attention of 
those who were at a distance; to col- 
lect troops that were in the immediate 
vicinity, the sound of the trumpet 
(Pp, for "EW Sp, comp. Jer. iv. 21) and 
a sign with the hand were sufficient. 


CHAP. XIII.] 


ISATAH. 


119 


Raise the sound to them; wave the hand; 
That they may enter the gates of the nobles. 

3 I have given charge to my consecrated warriors ; 
I have also called my heroes to execute my anger, 


My proud exulters ! 
4 The noise of a multitude on 


people ; 


—o7) is anticipative, and refers to the 
warriors under Cyrus, not named, but 
further described ver. 3, and expressly 
stated, ver. 17, to be the Medes. For 
this idiom, see chap. viii. 21.—The 1 
before the Future, after an Imperative 
is to be rendered ἐλαί.---- 3) ‘108, the 
gates of the nobles, may either signify 
the gates of the city, or those of the 
palace in which the princes were as- 
sembled. The latter is more probably 
meant. When the troops of Cyrus 
had turned off the waters of the 
Euphrates into the large ditch which 
he had caused to be dug, and the 
Babylonians, in the midst of their 
revelry, had neglected to shut the 
gates at the entrance and the outlet 
of the river, the Persians rushed into 
the city; and assembling in vast num- 
bers round the royal palace, gave a 
shout, which the king of Babylon 
mistook for the clamour of the drunken 
mob, and ordered his guards to open 
the palace gates, when the enemy 
entered and put all to the sword, 
- Herod, i. 191; Xenoph. Cyroped. 
vil. 5. 

3. WIND, my consecrated warriors. ΑΒ 
WIP signities fo separate, destine, appoint 
to any special purpose, hence consecrate ; 
the nature of the consecration must 
be determined by that of the subject. 
When war, as here, is spoken of, the 
reference is to the selection of the 
troops; not, however, without respect 
to the religious rites that were per- 
formed upon the occasion, 1 Sam. vii. 
5, 6, 9. Comp. Gen. xiv. 14, where 
Dy seems to be used in the same 
acceptation, 729, from which this 
adjective is derived, like Wy signifies 
to consecrate, dedicate, as a house, temple, 
&e., before using it. In the parallel 
-passage, Jer. li. 27, 28, the same verb 
is employed, and the subject presented 
-withconsiderableamplification. Comp. 


the mountains, as that of much 


also Jer. xxii. 7; Zeph. i. 7; in which 
last passage it is in Hiphil.— x) is 
elliptical. The entire phrase would be, 
ἜΝ niwy, fo execute my wrath; or ney? 
ἘΝ, to execute my fierce wrath; see 1 
Sam. xxviii, 18.—mwa ordy, lit. the 
evulters of my pride. According to a 
common idiom, when of two nouns in 
construction, the latter is used adject- 
ively, it has affixed to it the possessive 
pronoun, which belongs to the former, 
as, OW ὙΠ, the mountain of my holiness, 
for my holy mountain ; Wor ἸΏ, the fat 
of his flesh, for his fat flesh. So here, 
mwsa, pride, is to be construed as an 
adjective, and the phrase to be ren- 
dered, my proud exulters. Comp. ii. 11. 
Gesenius thinks 9, which signifies /o 
triumph, exult, has a primary reference 
to a cry or shout of exultation, like 
the Greek ἀλαλάζω. The native inso- 
lence of the Persians is roundly as- 
serted by Croesus: Πέρσαι φύσιν ἔοντες 
ὑβρισταί, Herod. i. 89. Herodotus 
likewise describes them as esteeming 
themselves vastly superior in all points 
to other men: Nopifovres ἑαυτοὺς εἶναι 
ἀνθρώπων μακρῷ τὰ πάντα ἀρίστους, 1. 
134; and Ammianus, xxiii. 6, charac- 
terises them as magnidici—superli. 
The LXX. render the words by a term 
cognate with that employed by Croesus: 
χαίροντες ἅμα καὶ ὑβρίζοντες. 

4, 5. The mountains to which the 
prophet refers are doubtless the ele- 
vated regions from which the warriors 
came who served in the Persian army: 
such as those of Media, Armenia, 
Koordistan, as well as the mountains 
of Sanjar in the more immediate 
vicinity of Babylon. The description 
is truly graphical. First, a tumul- 
tuous noise is heard, but not so dis- 
tinctly as to discover the cause: then 
the appearance of a vast army pre- 
sents itself ; the din becomes louder 
and louder ; and, at last, the hostile 


120 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XIII. 


The noise of the tumult of kingdoms, of assembled nations ; 
Jehovah of Hosts mustereth the army for battle. 

5 They come from a distant land, from the end of heaven, 
Jehovah, and the instruments of his indignation, 
To destroy the whole of the land. 

6 Howl ye, for the day of Jehovah is near! 


army is found to be so numerous, that 
it appears as if entire kingdoms had 
transferred their population, and were 
assembled for battle. To crown the 
whole, Jehovah is introduced as in- 
specting the troops previous to the 
engagement. In Jer. li. 27, Γῆ) 
WON} 37D UMS, the kingdoms of Ararat, 
Minni, and Ashkenaz, are specifically 
mentioned ; and in. ver. 28, Ὁ 390, 
the kings of the Medes, are noticed as 
those which furnished the expedition, 
According to Jerome, on Isaiah xxxvii. 
38, Ararat was not a mountain, but a 
region in the low country of Armenia, 
through which the Araxes flowed, and 
which was, as it still is, exceedingly 
fertile. The mountain commonly called 
by that name, on which the ark 
rested, lay contiguous on the S. W. 
and took its name from the country, 
Gen. vill. 4. The kingdom so named, 
in all probability, extended as far 
north as the river Cyrus, and com- 
prised a considerable portion of the 
country between the lakes Oormiah 
and Van. Minni, the same as Minyas, 
a mountainous region to the west of 
Ararat, the original kingdom of 4;»- 
menia, Which is supposed to be 
compounded of 2070, Har-mini, the 
mountain-land of Minyas. It included 
the whole of the country from the 
seas just mentioned, westward to 
Mount Taurus, and from the shores of 
the Pontus to Mesopotamia on the 
south. Ashhkenaz, Bochart places on 
the Propontis, in the north-west part 
of Asia Minor, on the ground that 
there existed in that quarter a lake, 
river, and gulf, called Ascanius. Other 
places towards the south have also 
been named, as have others on the 
Tanais and in Bactria; but it was 
probably some region bordering on 
the Caucasus, and the Black Sea. For 
the received Jewish application of the 
term to Germany, there is no suffi- 


cient foundation. Media compre- 
hended the extensive tract of country 
lying along the west and south of the 
Caspian Sea; and stretching south- 
ward along the east of Armenia, com- 
prised the provinces now known by 
the names of Shirvan, Azerbijan, Ghilan, 
Mazanderan, and Irak Ajemi. All 
these countries were celebrated for 
the number and bravery of their 
warriors: Azerbijan alone furnishing, 
according to Strabo, ten thousand 
horsemen, and forty thousand foot. 
By “the kings of the Medes,” in Jere- 
miah, are meant the satraps or vice- 
roys ruling in the larger divisions of 
Media and Persia, who put themselves 
at the head of the quota of men which 
they severally brought into the field. 

When the troops collected from all 
these different parts, and those which 
Cyrus had brought with him from 
Lydia, Cappadocia, and Phrygia, to- 
gether with the auxiliaries of Creesus, 
are taken into the account, it must be 
obvious no description could have 
been more appropriate than that 
given by Isaiah.—As to sense, JX 
pr) and Dw TYP are identical : the 
latter, which is otherwise equivalent 
to SINT TEP, is added for the sake of 
intensive parallelism. The reading, 
γα Tz79, found in three MSS. and 
originally in another, is in all proba- 
bility an imitation of the Targ.—y x 
might be regarded as a collective noun, 
including all the countries whence the 
armies came to attack Babylon; but 
as the Medo-Persian forces occupied 
the most prominent place, and the 
whole was under the command of 
Cyrus, the term has a special reference 
to Media. Comp. chap. v. 26, xlvi. 
11; Jer. 1. 9, 26, 41.) For ‘nz %, 
comp. Jer. 1. 25. yox7 2 is the same 
as 72m, ver. 11, the Babylonian em- 
pire. 

6, oo stands for 79, like pou for 


CHAP. XIII.] 


ISATAH. 


121 


As a mighty destruction from the Almighty it shall come! 
7 Because of this all hands shall be slackened, 
And every heart of man shall be dissolved ; 
8 And they shall tremble; pangs and sorrows shall seize them ; 
As a woman in labour shall they writhe ; 
They shall look-at each other with amazement ; 
Their faces shall be faces of flames. 
9 Behold! the day of Jehovah cometh! 
Cruel, with fury, and with burning anger ; 
To make the land a desolation, 


And exterminate its sinners. 


10 For the stars of the heavens, and their constellations, 


Shall not emit their light ; 


you, 2 Sam. xiv. 19. "τὸ, suggested 
by the use of τ, the LXX. render 
variously, but most frequently by 
Παντοκράτωρ, THE AumicHTy. It is 


derived from 77%, Arab. \i, fo be 


strong, powerful ; SiS, fortis, strenuus. 


According to Exod. vi. 3, it was, com- 
bined with δ, the name by which 
Jehovah peculiarly made himself 
known to the patriarchs. The form 
Ἢ is that of an obsolete plural, like 
2x, only in the latter word, the Patach 
is changed into Kametz, to distinguish 
it from the form in which the same 
word is used when applied in the 
plural to human masters.—The 3 
in Wis the Caph veritatis, see chap. 
i. 7; and comp. Joel i. 15, where the 
same form occurs. ‘12 TW in both 
passages form an elegant parono- 
masia. 

7, 8, contain a description of the 
dismay, consternation, and perplexity, 
into which the inhabitants of Babylon 
should be thrown on the capture of 
the city. The metaphors are taken 
from the physical effects produced up- 
on the human system by fear, alarm, 
or pain. Comp. Jer. 1. 43; Josh. vii. 
5 Psi πα 14iseiiizel.oxxiy 7-—In 
yw, the jis the intensive paragogic, 
as in the following verb. The nomi- 
native is the Babylonians, understood. 
The Hebrews say that a person fakes 
hold on fear, or what occasions fear, just 
as we say, to take fright ; see Job xviii. 


20, xxi. 6 ; as well as fear takes hold on, 
Exod. xv. 14, 15; so that, however 
the LXX., Syr., and Targ., might be 
justified in rendering the phrase agree- 
ably to the more common mode of 
construction, we should not be war- 
ranted to adopt D77N’,—the emenda- 
tion proposed by Lowth.—m327) °2, 
faces of flames, i.e. red, flushed, the 
result of agitation or violent commo- 
tion. 

9. "HR the same as Wx, erzvel, only 
with the’ of excess or intensity.—2P) 
ANTM are further expletive of DY, the 
nominative to the gerund 013, and to 
row following. 

10. A fine specimen of the figura- 
tive manner in which the Hebrew 
prophets depict the horrors of national 
calamity. The metaphors of light 
and darkness, to express prosperity 
and adversity, are quite common ; but 
when the effect is to be heightened, 
the writer represents the sources of 
light as being themselves affected, and 
their splendour as either increased or 
completely obscured. See Isaiah xxiv. 
23, xxxiv. 4; Ezek. xxxii. 7, 8 ; Joel 
ἢ. 10, 01.15; Amos viii. 9; Matt. 
xxiv. 29.—omos, lit. their Orions, 1. 68. 
Orion, and similar constellations, or 
remarkable groups of fixed stars, the 
science of which appears to be of 
great antiquity, since they are dis- 
tinctly recognised in Job, the most 
ancient book in existence, chap. ix. 9, 
“XXXVili. 31. See also Amos v.8. The 
name 7D) properly signifies @ fool, an 


122 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP, XIII. 


The sun shall be dark at his going forth, 
And the moon shall not cause her light to shine. 
11 And I will punish the world for its wickedness, 
And the wicked for their iniquity. 
Yea, I will cause the arrogance of the proud to cease, 
And lay low the haughtiness of the terrible. 
12 I will make men scarcer than gold, 


And human beings than the gold of Ophir. 


impious person; or, according to an- 
other acceptation, confident, insolent, 
refractory. In the Persian mythology, 
Orion is Vimrod, the founder of Babel, 
who was translated from earth to the 
position which he now occupies in 
the starry heavens. A similar belief 
appears to have been popular among 
other ancient nations. The name by 
which the Arabs designate this con- 


stellation is ps the Giant, a title 


corresponding to the term 7133, which 
we find applied to Nimrod, Gen. x. 8, 
9. They also give him Sirius as a 
dog for his companion, which fur- 
nishes another point of coincidence 
with the Scripture account of Nim- 
rod’s favourite pursuit. The same 
combination occurs also in Greek 
writers. Thus, Homer: 
ἀρίζηλοι δέ οἱ αὐγαὶ 

Φαίνονται πολλοῖσι μετ᾽ ἄστρασι νυκ- 

τὸς ἀμολγῷ" 
Ὅν τε κύν᾽ ‘Qpiwvos ἐπίκλησιν καλέ- 


ovat.” Iliad. x. 27—30. 


66. 


He is represented as having been 
greatly addicted to the chase, a giant 
in size, and distinguished for heroic 
exploits. On the supposition that 
similar ideas obtained among the 
Chaldeans, and were from them 
adopted by the Hebrews, of which 
there is no reason to doubt, the em- 
ployment of the term D°7D3, by Isaiah, 
was singularly appropriate. See Dr. 
Lee on Job ix, 9, and Gesenius on the 
present verse. The Targ. has ji», 
their Giants. Jerome’s Jewish precep- 
tor gave Arcturus as the signification 
of 909. 

11. 929, commonly signifies the hali- 
table globe, or world, but is here used, 


in arestricted sense, of the Babylonian 
world, just as οἰκουμένη, the term by 
which the LXX. render it, is employed 
to denote the Roman empire, orbis 
Romanus, Joseph. Antig. xii. 3, 1; 
Herod. v. 2, 5; and Palestine, Acts xi. 
28. Thus also the Turkish poet 


Uweissi uses wl mundus, ἴῃ appli- 


cation to the Turkish empire in the 
line, phydy)s $ObuS ake dy 3 sees 
Ye have, by various innovations, brought 
ruin upon the empire. Warning to 
Islamboul, p. 6; see also page 12. 

12. YIN expresses the extreme pau- 
city to which the population would 
be reduced ; being used in the sense 
of rare, scarce, and not in that of valu- 
able, given in our common version. 
No interpretation can be more false 
than that which supposes the passage 
to refer either to Cyrus or to Christ ; 
or, as some others would have it, to 
the Jews in Babylon. That of Grotius 
is also forced; viz. that the Medes 
would not for money be induced to 
spare any one.—%8, and 03, are fre- 
quently used of the purest or best 
gold. The former is derived from 18, 
found only in Hoph. 1 Kings x. 18, 
but according to the reading 179 3m, 
2 Chron, ix. 17, it signifies pure or 


purified gold. Comp. Arab. 2.48, to 


separate. OD3 properly signifies hidden 
gold, gold which is so pure, that it is 
laid up in a secure place, on account 
of its value. Comp. 10D 133, 1 Kings 
vi. 20,21. In the present place the 
idea intended to be conveyed by both 
terms is that of extreme rarity.—The 
relative position of YIN and VpixX, and 
the occurrence elsewhere of the com- 
bination V5 ὉΠ, sufficiently shew, 


CHAP. XIII. | 


ISAIAH. 


123 


13 Because I will cause the heavens to tremble, 
And the earth shall be shaken out of her place ; 
In the fury of Jehovah of Hosts, 
And in the day of his burning anger. 

14 And they shall be like a chased gazelle, 
And like sheep, without any one to collect them ; 


that how perfect soever their agree- 
ment in form, no paronomasia was 
designed. As to the geographical sit- 
uation of VHX, Ophir, various opinions 
are entertained. From the term being 
rendered Σουφίρ, Σουφείρ, Σωφείρ, Σω- 
hip, Σωφηρά, Σωφαρά, τὰ the LXX., 
and there having been a region called 
Sofala somewhere about Zanguebar, or 
Mozambique, on the eastern coast of 
Africa, now named Afura, some have 
been disposed to identify them ; but 
the place seems more probably to 
have existed either in Arabia or in 
India. In favour of the latter country 
it has been alleged, that Arrian men- 
tions a place by the name of Οὔππαρα, 
situated near the present Goa, called 
by Ptolemy and Ammianus Σουπάρα, 


doubtless the sw, Sofara, of Abul- 


feda; and that India abounded in 
gold, precious stones, and the other 
articles of merchandise specified as 
brought from Ophir, 1 Kings ix. 28, x. 
11 ; 2 Chron. viii. 18,ix.10. To which 
add, that in Kings and Chronicles, and 
in the present instance, the Arabic 


translator renders the word by Nil, 


India. Others after Bochart, have 
imagined they found it in Ceylon, 
supposed to be the Taprobane of Pliny, 
vi. 24. But the opinion best sup- 
ported is that which refers it to 
Arabia. “5x, Ophir, is employed, Gen. 
x. 29, to designate a portion of the 
descendants of Joktan ; and, to judge 
from the other names occurring in 
connexion with it in that geographical 
table, they must have inhabited some 
region in the present Oman, on the 
west coast of the Persian gulf, just 
below the straits of Ormuz; where 
Ibn Batuta describesacity of the name 


of jee , Zafar, a month’s journey from 
Aden, and sixteen days’ from Hadra- 


maut. In this district there is still a 
town called H/-Ophir, in all probability 
the pe of Edrisi. The Scriptures, 2 


Chron. ix. 14; Ps. lxxii. 15 ; Isa. lx. 6 ; 
speak of Arabia as a country abound- 
ing in gold ; and the same testimony is 
borne by Diod. Sic. 11. 50, iti. 44, 47 ; 
Strabo, xvi. 777. It is not, however, 
necessary to suppose that the gold and 
other articles were native productions 
of the region about Ophir: they may 
have been conveyed thither by coast- 
ing vessels from India, or even the 
Indian archipelago, and laid up there, 
as in a great emporium, to be re- 
shipped, or conveyed in caravans, 
according to the demand. See Ge- 
senius zz loc. and Heb. Lex. iz voc.; 
Robinson’s Calmet, and Winer’s Real- 
Worterb. 

13. To give sublimity and force to 
the prophetic description of the awful 
political catastrophe, the entire system 
of the universe is represented as un- 
dergoing a revolution—a figure fre- 
quently employed in the higher kinds 
of Hebrew composition. Comp. Ps. 
XVill. 7—15, xlvi. 2, 3; Isa. xxiv. 19, 
xxxiv. 4; Joel iii. 15, 16. 

14—16. These verses are closely 
connected with the preceding, and 
describe the effects of the visitation 
on the inhabitants of Babylon, espe- 
cially such strangers as happened to 
be in the city at the time of the 
attack. Being a place of great con- 
course, as the seat of a mighty em- 
pire, and of extensive and flourishing 
commerce, vast numbers from all 
quarters would be found collected 
within its walls, Jer. 1. 37. On the 
approach of the enemy these would 
take to flight, and each, if possible, 
direct his course towards his native 
place. Comp. Jer. 1. 16. 33, the 
gazelle, is selected on account of its 
timidity, and the lightness with 


124 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XIII. 


They shall turn, each to his own people, 
And they shall flee, each to his own land. 


15 


Every one that is found shall be stabbed, 


And every one that betakes himself to flight shall fall by the 


sword. 
16 


And their infants shall be dashed in pieces before their eyes ; 


Their houses shall be plundered, and their wives ravished. 


17 
Who regard not silver, 
And have no delight in gold. 


which it bounds across the plains, to 
express the haste with which the 
alarmed foreigners wouldattempt their 
escape. After JN2, repeat N72 in the 
plural, and supply ons after y322.— 
ΤΙΒΌΞΙΤ 5, every one that betaketh himself 
to flight. Most interpreters consider 
720 as synonymous with "Ox, or FD, 
and give the sense of gathering, assem- 
bling together, joining, or such like. It 
is clear, however, that none of these 
senses accords with Xz'D3, in the corre- 
sponding part of the parallelism. As 
this verb signifies in Niphal, fo ezis¢, 
be present any where, the only suitable 
sense to attach to 78D), is that of not 
being found, having removed, taken one’ s- 
self off: a sense of which it admits— 
md, in Kal, signifying ¢o take off, re- 


move ; Arab. (sme, agilis ac velox fuit 


eundo vel volando. The description 
comprehends those who should re- 
main in the city, and those who should 
take to flight. No class, age, sex, or 
property, should be spared by the 
enemy, but all should be subject to 
the calamities incident to war. Comp. 
2 Kings vili. 12; Zech. xiv. 2; Ps. 
exxxvil. 9. The fulfilment of this 
prophecy is recorded by Xenophon, 
who informs us, that on the taking of 
the city, Cyrus sent his cavalry by 
detachments into the roads, with 
orders to put to death all that were 
found without the palace. ‘O δὲ Κῦρος 
διέπεμπε τὰς τῶν ἱππέων τάξεις κατὰ 
τὰς ὁδούς" καὶ προεῖπεν οὺς μὲν ἔξω λαμ- 
βάνοιεν κατακαίνειν, τοὺς δ᾽ ἐν ταῖς 
οἰκίαις κηρύττειν τοὺς Συριστὶ ἐπιστα- 
μένους ἔνδον μένειν. εἰ δέ τις ἔξω λη- 
φθείη, ὅτι θανατώσοιτο. Οἱ μὲν δὴ ταῦτα 
ἐποίουν. Cyroped. v. 11—For the 


Behold, I will stir up against them the Medes, 


verb 523, in this and other places 
where it occurs, the Masorites have 
substituted 120 in the Keri, but 
merely from a principle of taste. 

17. For the country of the Medes, 
see note ver. 5. From the earliest 
times they formed one of the largest 
and most civilized kingdoms of Asia. 
They were, however, conquered by 
Ninus, and bore the Assyrian yoke 
for a period of five hundred and 
twenty years; but revolted during 
the expeditions of Tiglath - pileser 
and Shalmaneser into Western Asia. 
About the year B.c. 700, Dejoces 
was elected king. In the reign of 
his son and successor Phraortes, the 
Persian empire was added to that of 
the Medes: the combined forces of 
which were soon employed for extend- 
ing his conquests. Having, after a 
struggle of twenty years, expelled the 
Scythians, who had invaded the king- 
dom during his renewal of the siege 
of Nineveh, Cyaxares I., with the 
assistance of Nabopolassar, king of 
Babylon, took that city, and made 
Assyria a province of the Median 
empire. Under Cyaxares II. hostilities 
broke out between the Medes and 
Babylonians, when Cyrus his nephew 
was sent to assist him, at the head of 
thirty thousand men. The Babylonians 
having been dispersed, the war was 
carried into Asia Minor; Creesus king 
of Lydia was defeated; Sardis his 
capital taken ; and his army added to 
that of the conqueror. It was now 
that Cyrus, in the plenitude of power 
and success, returned to lay siege to 
Babylon.—We read of the Medes and 
Persians, Esth. x. 2; Isa. xxi. 2; Dan. 
v. 28; and, in reversed order, the 


CHAP. XIII.| 


ISATAH. 


125 


18 Their bows also shall dash in pieces the young men ; 
And on the fruit of the womb they shall have no compassion ; 
Their eye shall not pity the children. 


19 


And Babylon, the beauty of kingdoms, 


The glorious ornament of the Chaldeans, 
Shall be like Sodom and Gomorrah, overthrown by God. 


20 


She shall never more be inhabited, 


Nor dwelt in through successive generations : 

The Arab shall not pitch his tent there, 

Neither shall the shepherds make their flocks to lie there. 
21 But the wild beasts of the desert shall lie there, 


Persians and Medes, Esth. i. 18, 19; 
but the term Medes is here used, as it 
often is by Greek writers, to compre- 
hend both.—Their disregard of money 
is attested by Xenophon, who repre- 
sents Cyrus as complimenting them 
on their not having been induced to 
engage in the war from mercenary 
motives: Ἄνδρες Μῆδοι, καὶ πάντες οἱ 
παρόντες, ἐγὼ ὑμᾶς οἶδα σαφῶς, ὅτι οὔτε 
χρημάτων δεόμενοι σὺν ἐμοὶ ἐξήλθετε. 
Cyroped. v. 3. See Keith’s Evidence 
from Prophecy, 14th edit. p. 260. 

18. ning. The dows of the Per- 
sians, which formed their principal 
weapon, were only exceeded in size 
and strength by those of the Ethio- 
pians, and were well fitted to be used 
as clubs. They measured about three 
cubits in length.—yo2® and 023 are 
synonymous. To the cruelty of the 
invading foe decided testimony is 
borne by Ammianus: “ magnidici, et 
graves, ac tetri, minaces juxta in 
adversis rebus ac prosperis, callidi, 
superbi, CRUDELES.” And Diod. Sic. 
lib. viii. attributes the destruction of 
the empire of the Medes to their 
cruelty towards inferiors: Ti καθεῖλε 
τὴν Μήδων ἀρχήν; ἡ πρὸς τοὺς ταπεινο- 
TEPOVS ὠμότης. 

19. ΟΞ, the Chaldeans, see note on 
chap. xxiii. 13. 7289, being a verbal 
noun, is construed like the Infin. from 
which it is derived. The comparison 
of the destruction of any place with that 
of Sodom and Gomorrah, for the sake 
of aggravation, is very common, See 
Deut. xxix. 22; Jer.].40; Amos iv. 11. 

20. A prediction of the final and 


utter desolation of Babylon.—7%n, and 
aun, though active, are used passively, 
—7, by an elision of the & for 7s, 
like ἢ: for ἢ, Job xxxv. 11; 1m for 
wn, 2 Sam. xx. 9; "2m for ‘MNM, 2 
Sam. xxii. 40. This elision is occa- 
sioned by the very slight consonantal 
power of the Aleph, in virtue of which 
it easily becomes lost in the vowel 
attached to it. Nordheimer, Crit. 
Heb. Gram. § 88. 3. Hitzig would 
rather refer it to 73, as the root, 


Arab, del, to lead to water, and ex- 


plains it as meaning, that no Arab 
should be found conducting his flocks 
to drink; but he fails in his attempt 
to prove its Hiphilic form. 

21. Having employed the verb yn 
at the end of the preceding verse, the 
prophet with great force repeats it 
when about to depict the only inha- 
bitants that would in the course of 
time be found in Babylon. oy de- 
note such wild beasts generally as are 
found in steppes, or arid deserts ; from 


mY, or Mm, obsolete roots, Arab. | 0, 


τε 
exaruit, signifying to be exposed to the 
sun, to be dry, desert, ἕο. 'The noun is 
used of human beings inhabiting un- 
cultivated regions, Ps. Ixxii. 9, lxxiv. 
14; but the connexion in the present 
case determines the sense to be that 
of irrational animals. Comp. chap. 
xxxiv. 14; Jer. 1. 39; in which last 
passage the language applied to the 
same subject as here, is partly identi- 
calin terms. By ἘΠῚ are meant such 
of the ruins of their houses as might 


Q 


126 


ISATAH. 


(CHAP. XIII. 


And the owls shall fill their houses ; 
The ostriches also shall dwell there, 
And the wild goats shall skip there. 
22 And the jackals shall ery in their palaces, 


remain.—Onk is an onomatopoetiec, 
like the Arab. ce, to repeat the 


doleful exclamation ah/ lit. the how- 
lers, i.e. owls, noted for their frequent- 
ing old ruins, or uninhabited buildings, 
and giving forth a doleful ery when 
taking wing. According to the com- 
mon reading of the text of Aq., he 
translated the word by τυφώνων, Ty- 
phons; but the first syllable is in all 
probability an addition: the original 
φωνῶν being found in Procopius. 
Symm. retains the Hebrew ὠχείμ ; 
LXX. and Theod. 7xo0v.—my niva, lit. 
daughters of greediness, a name given to 
ostriches, on account of their voracious 
appetite; and frequently used both of 
the males and the females. Some 
derive the latter noun from Τῶν, fo 
respond, ery, &c., but less properly, 
though they are also notorious for the 
doleful and hideous noise which they 
make, particularly at night. The 
LXX. in other places render στρουθοὶ 
or στρουθία ; but here σειρῆνες, which 
they give as a translation of 03m, when 
it occurs before my n22; Symm. and 
Theod. orpovOoxdpyndou.—orry, LXX. 


δαιμόνια, Targ. pT, Syr. ees ; hence 


Luther’s Feldgeister, field-spirits, and 
the Waldteufel, “devils,” or “demons 
of the wood,” of Gesenius and Hitzig. 
Thus also our common version, satyrs, 
and the French /utins, “ hobgoblins.” 
All these, and other translators who 
render similarly, have regarded the 
term as designed to convey the idea of 
a species of beings approaching more 
or less to the nature and shape of 
brute animals, most probably that of 
the goat, yet at the same time exhi- 
biting in part the human form. They 
abound in the Greek mythology, along 
with Stleni, Fauns, &c. That notions 
of the existence of such creatures 
prevailed in the East, and that they 
still prevail there, is matter of noto- 
riety. The Arabic, Persian, and 


Turkish books are full of them. It 
is more than questionable, however, 
whether any reference is here made to 
such superstitious belief. Popular 
ideas are sometimes introduced into 
the Scriptures for the sake of illustra- 
tion; but it is contrary to the usage 
of the sacred writers, as it is in- 
compatible with their design, so to 
introduce them as even seemingly to 
give them the sanction of Divine 
authority. It is most natural to 
suppose that real animals are in- 
tended; and as Ὁ Ὁ elsewhere signify 
goats, there seems no reason why this 
sense should be departed from in the 
present instance. It is true the term 
is employed to denote odjects of ido- 
latrous worship, Lev. xvii. 7; 2 Chron. 
xi. 15; but there the actual figures or 
images of the animal are meant, which 
were employed in the service of the 
Egyptian idol, (Herod ii. 42,) and is, 
therefore, improperly rendered devils 
in our common version. The proposed 
interpretation has the support of 
τριχιῶνται, of Aq., and ὀρθοτριχοῦνται, 
of Theod., by which they obviously 
meant hairy, shaggy animals, such as 
goats. Thus also the Vulg. pilosi, and 


Saadias expressly csr Sa wild goats. 


Some suppose the ourang-outang to 
be meant; and Coverdale has apes; 
but the term by which these animals 
are designated in Hebrew is ἢν, 1 
Kings x. 22.—Rev. xviii. 2, is an appro- 
priation of the translation given of 
the present text by the LXX. to 
describe figuratively the desolation of 
the great antichristian establishment, 
and cannot be viewed as vouching for 
the correctness of that version, any 
more than numerous other quotations 
made from it in the N.T., in which it 
undeniably differs from the literal 
meaning of the Hebrew text. 

22. The verb 7» is in the singular, 
because it precedes the noun, the 
number of which had not been deter- 
mined in the prophet’s mind when he 


CHAP. XIV.] 


ISAIAH. 


127 


And the wolves in the temples of pleasure :— 
Yea, her time is near in its approach, 


And her days shall not be prolonged. 


began the sentence. This idiom fre- 
quently occurs.—o™x, contracted for 
ox, Aq., Symm., and Theod., retain 
in their versions, ietv. LXX. ὀνοκέν- 
tavpot, asinine centaurs, fabulous beings 
or hobgoblins, which the ancients 
imagined were wont to appear with 
legs and feet like those of an ass, or, 
with one brazen and the other like 
that of an ass. They were otherwise, 
from this circumstance, called ἐμπού- 
oa. The Heb. word being derived 
from 7s, seems quite to correspond to 


i) oss Ibn Awi, the son of howling, 


by which name the Arabs designate 
the jackal: an animal noted for its 
melancholy scream at night, like the 
crying of a child, as I had occasion to 
observe, when travelling in the Cau- 
casus.—nin2>x stands for nv, palaces, 
—the Ἢ being as frequently softened 
into > That palaces, and not lonely, 
Sorsaken places, are meant, the corre- 
sponding 23 227 sufficiently shews.— 
ἋΣ gives prominence to the luxury 
and voluptuousness in which the 
Babylonians indulged, and greatly 
adds to the force of the contrast. δ 
suffixed is to be taken collectively.— 
min, LXX. ἐχῖνοι, mistaking the word 
for O34, serpents. Aq., Symm., Theod., 
and all the other Greek versions, 
σειρῆνες; Vulg. sirenes. Rabbi Tan- 


chum interprets the word as signifying 
ss! ω» Ibn Awi; see Pococke’s ela- 


borate note on Micah i. 8; but this 
phrase corresponds, as we have seen, 
to o»x, and must, therefore, designate 
some other species of animal. On com- 
paring the Hebrew of Ps. xliv. 20; Is. 
xlii. 20; Jer. ix. 10, x. 22, xlix. 33; itis 
evident that the 024 were wild beasts 
of the desert ; but no hint is given that 
would lead us to refer them to the 
race of serpents, as some have done. 
They seem rather to be wolves: comp. 


the Arab. ws lupus,—these animals 


and the jackals resembling each other 
in several respects, particularly in the 
disagreeable whine, or cry, which they 
make in the night. For the exact 
fulfilment of the prophecy, see Keith’s 
Evidence, pp. 238—325. 

The concluding words of the verse 
seem at first view to militate against 
their having been delivered by Isaiah ; 
but the Divine judgments are fre- 
quently, in the prophetic style, said 
to be at hand, or to approach, though 
a long period intervene between their 
announcement and their execution. 
See Ezek. xxx. 3; Joel i. 15, 1. 1; 
Rom. xiii, 12; 1 Pet. iv. 7; Rev. 1. 3, 
xxii. 10. 


— 4... 


CHAPTER XIV. 


This chapter, to the 23d verse, prosecutes the subject to the fall of Babylon. 
After a cheering promise to the Jews, assuring them of their deliverance 
from captivity, in consequence of the conquest of their enemy, 1—3, the 
prophet introduces a magnificent ode of triumph to be employed by them 
on the occasion, 4—21; and, to complete the prophecy, Jehovah is repre- 
sented, 22, 23, as repeating the announcement of the entire destruction of 


Babylon and its inhabitants. 


Verses 24—27 contain a brief prediction of 


the discomfiture of Sennacherib’s army, which connects with chap. x. in 
point of subject, but occupies its proper place in this connexion ; and the 
chapter concludes with a distinct prediction of the punishment of the 


Philistines, 28—32. _ 


128 ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XIV. 


1 For Jehovah will take pity on Jacob, 
Yea, he will again make choice of Israel, 
And settle them in their own land ; 
And strangers shall join themselves to them, 
They shall attach themselves to the house of Jacob. 
2 And the people shall take them, and bring them to their own 


place. 


And the house of Israel shall possess them in the land of Jehovah, 
As servants and as handmaids ; 
For they shall take captive their captors, 
And shall rule over their oppressors. 
3,4 And it shall be in the day, when Jehovah shall have given thee 
rest from thine affliction, and thy disquiet, and from the hard 
labour which was forcedly done by thee, that thou shalt 


1. o7y 3. The conjunction here 
forcibly introduces the ultimate cause 
of the downfal of Babylon—the pity 
of Jehovah towards his people, and 
their restoration to their own land. 
ΠΕΡ is quite synonymous with ΠῚ): 
both signify to join oneself to another, 
so as to make a common cause with 
him. ὅν, in such connexion, conveys 
the idea of inclination towards, or 
dependence upon the following sub- 
ject. The Jews formed, as it were, 
the substratum on which the foreigner 
rested. 21s a collective noun, which 
accounts for one of the verbs being 
in the singular, and the other in the 
plural. 

2. For the fulfilment of this and the 
preceding verse, see Ezra ii. 65, where 
it is expressly stated, that seven thou- 
sand three hundred thirty and seven 
servants and maids accompanied the 
exiles on their» return. That these 
were foreigners and not Israelites, is 
evident from their not being reckoned 
in the total number of the congrega- 
tion. Their taking them along with 
them as servants, is compared to their 
having themselves been carried into 
captivity into Babylon. That they 
took them away as slaves is not at all 
improbable. 

3, Instead of Hiric under Ὁ in 732Y2 
77>, a vast number of MSS. and 
printed editions read 7'2éré, which is 
the regular punctuation. J273Y Ws, 
which was forcedly done by or through thee. 


The verb being in Pua/ has an inten- 
sive signification ; and, construed with 
3, conveys the idea of foreign influence 
exerted upon the persons spoken of. 
That it should be of the Mas. and not 
the Fem. gender, to agree with 773», 
the nominative, is to be accounted for 
by an implied reference to the king of 
Babylon, by whom the hard servitude 
had been imposed. 

4, Here commences the ode of 
triumph on the fall of the Babylonian 
monarch, which has called forth ex- 
pressions of the highest admiration 
from those best qualified to judge in 
matters of poetic beauty andsublimity. 
Bishop Lowth declares, that he “knows 
not a single instance in the whole 
compass of Greek and Roman poetry, 
which, in every excellence of compo- 
sition, can be said to equal, or even to 
approach it ;” and, “that it may with 
truth be affirmed, that there is no 
poem of its kind extant in any lan- 
guage, in which the subject is so well 
laid out, and so happily conducted, 
with such a richness of invention, 
with such variety of images, persons, 
and distinct actions, with such rapidity 
and ease of transition, in so small a 
compass, aS in this ode of Isaiah. 
For beauty of disposition, strength of 
colouring, greatness of sentiment, 
brevity, perspicuity, and force of ex- 
pression, it stands among all the 
monuments of antiquity unrivalled.” 
Notes on Isaiah, and Lect. xiii, on 


CHAP. XIV.] 


ISAIAH. 


129 


give utterance to this Ode respecting the king of Babylon, 


and say : 


How hath the oppressor ceased ! 


The exactress of gold ceased ! 


5 Jehovah hath broken the staff of the wicked, 


The rod of the tyrants, 
6 That smote the people in fury 


Heb. Poetry. 502, Mashal, the term 
by which it is designated, is singularly 
appropriate, since it signifies not 
merely similitude, parable, figurative 
composition, but also, what is peculiarly 
sublime and energetic, what is calculated 
by its boldness and force to strike and 
influence the mind. 'The signification of 
the root 29, is fo assimilate, and also 
to rule or have dominion, to exert an in- 
fluence over others. Comp, the Arab. 
he, similis fuit; prestans fuit; Qdd, 
prestantissimus; Eth. GUPTA : com- 
paravit, evistimavit. 02 xv? means to 
give utterance to such sublime com- 
position iz au elevated tone of voice. 
Comp. Numb. xxiii. 7, 18, xxiv. 3,15; 
Micah ii. 4—The Mashal opens with 
a sudden exclamation of joy on the 
part of the Jews. The oppressed 
world and its inhabitants are then 
introduced as participating in the ex- 
ultation. The forests of Lebanon join 
in the song; Hades personified, rouses 
departed kings and princes to receive 
the king of Babylon on his entrance 
into their gloomy abode. These give 
expression to no words of condolence, 
but merely to a brief sentence of 
surprise, not unmingled with satisfac- 
tion at his reverse of fortune. The 
Jews then tauntingly resume the song 
in which they confirm at some length 
the sentiment just uttered in Sheol; 
and introduce the monarch boasting 
of his power and the vastness of his 
purposes, while they contrast with 
these, his present state of utter pros- 
tration and ignominy; concluding 
with an execration on his offspring 
and memory.—72712, which only 
occurs in this verse, has been vari- 
ously translated. Michaelis, Doder- 
lein, Dereser, Gesenius, and Hitzig, 
adopt the reading, 72799, which is 
found in an edition of Isaiah printed 


at Thessalonica in 1600, and render, 
oppression; considering it to be a deri- 
vative from 17, ἐο press, urge strongly. 
There does not, however, appear sufti- 
cient reason why 2772 should be 
rejected. It is a Chaldee word: (3m, 
gold, corresponding to 43 in Hebrew,) 
and was probably one of the epithets 
employed by the Babylonians in praise 
of their city—“ the golden one,” or 
“the golden city,” vy being under- 


stood. Comp. the Arab. Lerrde, 


auratus. Whether they thus desig- 
nated her on account of the gilded 
domes and turrets which abounded, 


Oo vy Φ v 
(comp. ἰξσι, Ἰξσι,ξο; in the Phi- 


lox. Syr. Version of Rev. xvii. 4,) or 
to convey the idea of the immense 
quantities of gold in her treasuries, 
temples, &c., cannot be determined ; 
but to judge from the exactness of the 
parallelism in this ode, it seems to be 
certain, that the prophet used the 
word in the Aphel sense of making, 
procuring, raising gold by exaction or 
tribute. Thus the LXX. ἐπισπουδαστής, 


00 Υ 
Syr. fagiaaado, evactor, leaving out 
the idea of gold. Vulg. ¢ributum. 
The above-interpretation is adopted 
by Lowth and Winer. 

5, 6. 72 and 029 are not to be un- 
derstood in the sense of sceptre, but 
in that of an instrument of oppression 
and affliction. Oo being parallel to 
myth, implies the idea of unjust, 
tyrannical rulers. 132 is an instance 
of the construct being used for the 
absolute, as in many other passages. 
See chap. xxxiii. 6, xxxv. 2; Lam. ii. 18. 
Instead of 772, which is the reading 
of all the Heb. MSS., Déderlein pro- 
poses we should read N77, there being, 
as Gesenius observes, often scarcely 


180 ISATAL. 


With an unremitting stroke ; 


[CHAP. XIV. 


That ruled over the nations in anger, 


With unsparing tyranny. 


7 The whole earth resteth, it is quiet ; 


They burst into song. 


8 Even the cypress trees exult over thee, 


And the cedars of Lebanon [saying]: 


Since thou art fallen, 


No feller hath come up against us. 
9 Sheol beneath is in commotion for thee, 


any perceptible difference between 
the letters ἢ and Π in the Eastern and 
German codices. The passage would 
then read, with unrestrained dominion. 
This ingenious conjecture is adopted 
by Gesenius and Hitzig, who specially 
urge in its favour the completeness of 
the parallelism, which they conceive 
to be infringed by the present reading. 
That a difficulty is created by the 
passive form, το, cannot be denied ; 
yet this may be removed by supposing 
it to have been the design of the 
prophet to give prominence to the 
persecution or tyranny, as experienced 
by those who were the subjects of it. 
It was an evil of which they were zof 
permitted to feel any alleviation. The 
meaning of 77) and 7, in such con- 
nexion, being almost the same, the 
verbs are more parallel than 770 and 
qo. Besides FLT occurs in con- 
nexion with 41, 2 Sam. xviii. 16. The 
LXX., Targ., Syr., and Vulg., appear 
to have read το, the participle in 
Piel. The rendering of our common 
version, which makes the king of 
Babylon the nominative, cannot be 
sustained, being a direct violation of 
the parallelism. 

7. 732) 738, to burst into song, is a 
favourite phrase of Isaiah in those 
chapters which Gesenius treats as 
spurious. Its occurrence in this 
chapter furnishes a corroborative 
proof of their genuineness. The no- 
minative to WE is WIV, her inhabit- 
ants, understood. They were now 
allowed peaceably to pursue their 
avocations, and loudly rejoiced in the 
change that had taken place. 

8. The objects of inanimate nature 


here personified, are to be understood 
figuratively as denoting those princes 
and kings whom the monarch of 
Babylon had subdued. Comp. chap. 
ii, 13; Ezek. xxxi., where the same 
metaphor isused, That any reference 
should be had to that monarch’s 
having cut down the forests of 
Lebanon, to beautify his capital, is 
very improbable. The particle, 23, a/so 
or even, on which Gesenius and Hitzig 
lay considerable stress, as favouring 
the literal interpretation, possesses 
quite as much force, if we take the 
meaning of the passage to be figura- 
tive. Not only the inferior inhabit- 
ants of the countries subject to 
Babylonian tyranny, but even the 
most exalted and powerful of their 
rulers who felt the effects of its 
exercise, participate in the common 
joy. Since its extinction, they had 
occupied, unmolested, their stations 
of dignity and honour. Comp. chap. 
ii. 12, 13. 

9. The boldest instance of prosopo- 
peia to be met with in any language. 
On Sheol, see chap. v.14. The Arab. 


version has ease Gehim, the same as 
“ 


(M>> ree, Gehenna, the place of 


eternal fire ; though in the popular 
Mohammedan theology, gts?-, is as- 


signed to the Jews, who falsely ac- 
cused and killed their own prophets ; 
while ,ig>, is reserved for such 
Mohammedans as die without repent- 


ance, under the guilt of capital sins. 
——ngm2 is improperly rendered /om 


ϑ 


_ 


ΟΗΑ͂Ρ.ΣΙΥ.] 


To meet thine entrance ; 


ISATAH. 


151. 


It rouseth for thee the deceased, all the leaders of the earth ; 

It causeth to rise from their thrones all the kings of the nations. 
10 They all commence, and say to thee: 

Art thou too become weak as we are ? 


Art thou become like unto us ? 


beneath: the Ὁ retaining no more of 
the prepositive power in such case, 
than in 129, 2, pov, &e., in which it 
simply expresses locality. So the 


Arab. Quis wr) Koran, Sur. 11. 23, 


vi. 65.— xv is of common gender, and 
may be construed, as in 2) and 1, 
op, with either ; so that there is no 
ground for the exegesis of Jackson and 
others, that in one of the instances 
the prince of the lower regions is 
meant: an idea which, as has been 
remarked, is quite foreign to the 
theology of the Hebrews.—oyn, Aq. 
and Theod. ῥαφαείμ; LXX., Targ., Syr., 
Vulg., Giants. Because this word is 
identical with that employed to denote 
a tribe of gigantic Canaanites, Gen. 
xiv. 5, and others of uncommon sta- 
ture, some imagine that these ancient 
giants are here specifically meant ; but 
the frequent occurrence of the term 
in connexions where simply the notion 
of the departed is conveyed, without 
any regard to bodily stature, proves, 
that it is to be derived, not from ΝΒ, 
which signifies to heal, make sound, 
robust, &c., but from 75), to fall, fall 
away, relax, become faint, and so to be 
powerless as it regards every thing in 
the present state. We have examples 
of similar derivation in oxo, from 


77; OND, from 722. Comp. &y, com- 
mode quieteque vizxit, and (5 quietavit, 


quietum reddidit. In reference to the 
turmoils and annoyances of this life, 
as well as to its active concerns, there 
is a total cessation at death. See Job 
11. 13, 17—Yrwopny, lit. the he-goats of 
the earth, but used metaphorically of 
leaders, kings, or princes. Comp. 
Zech. x. 3. The LXX., Syr, Vulg., 
Arab., resolve the figure, and render 
rulers, princes. 'The Targ. appears to 
have read ")ry, or FIX ‘PHY, “ the rich 


of the earth,” mistaking 1 for 71—In 
this verse the state of the dead is 
represented as thrown into great 
agitation, on its being announced 
that the mighty king of Babylon is 
about to enter. Personages of the 
same rank, as the fittest to conduct 
the ceremony of his reception, and 
the most likely to sympathise with 
him, are selected to present them- 
selves, and address him on the occasion. 
They rise from their thrones of state 
on which they had been sitting—per- 
petuating in mock majesty the pageant 
which they had exhibited while on 
earth ; (just as Ezekiel describes the 
departed warriors with their weapons 
of war and their swords laid under 
their head in Sheol, chap. xxxii. 27 ;) 
but instead of condoling with him, 
they merely give utterance to the few 
words contained in the 10th verse, 
which rather aggravate his downfal, 
by reminding him of his deprivation 
of power and pomp, and his reduction 
to a state of equality with themselves, 
many of whom he had subdued or slain. 


10, 7», Arab. uss voluit, intendit 


aliquid dictis suis ; protulit, respondit ; 
like ἀποκρίνεσθαι, in the LXX. and N. 
T., usually signifies ¢o answer, or respond, 
but also ¢o commence speaking; and 
preceding the verb 72x, it increases 
its force. Gesenius considers the lat- 
ter acceptation to be more recent 
Hebrew. It occurs, however, Job iii. 
2, the antiquity of which book has 
lately been ably vindicated by Dr. 
Lee ; and is also found, Deut. xxi. 7, 
xxvi. 5. Comp. Zech. i. 10, iii. 4, 
iv. 11, 12.—There is uncommon beauty 
in the brevity of this address. It is 
precisely such as might be expected 
from those by whom it is delivered. 
To extend it, so as to make it com- 
prehend one or more of the following 
verses, or, as some have done, the 


ISATAH. [CHAP. XIV. 


132 


11 Thy pomp is brought down to Sheol, 
And the sounding of thy harps ; 
Under thee is spread putridity, 

And the worms are thy covering. 

12 How thou art fallen from heaven, 

Illustrious Son of the Morning! 


whole of the remaining part of the 
Mashal, would quite spoil the effect. 

11. The Jews here continue their 
taunting Mashal.—xw, for 780, the 
local 7 being omitted. Instead of 
oN, sixty-five MSS., originally one 
more, and now two, twelve printed 
editions, some of them the earliest, 
with the LXX., Syr., Arab., and Vulg., 
read O22 in the singular; but as 
there appears to be a studied accor- 
dance between 7AIA and Fer, the 
true reading is more probably that of 
the Textus Receptus. The latter half 
of the verse clearly shews, that the 
Hebrews were accustomed to consider 
the grave as forming part of Sheol. 
Instead, however, of the royal body 
being embalmed, or inwrapped with 
splendid sepulchral attire, and placed 
in a magnificent mausoleum, it was 
to become a mass of putridity and 
worms. What is thus briefly antici- 
pated, is expressly and fully stated 
ver. 19. 

19. Ὑτυ 3 57, Llustrious Son of the 
Morning! The form 7 occurring 
Ezek. xxi. 17, and Zech, xi. 2, (9777,) 
as the Hiph. Imper. of %, to howl, 
lament, some take it in the same ac- 
ceptation here, and render lament, Son 
of the Morning, a.sense not in itself to 
be rejected. Thus Aq,, the Syr., and 
Jerome in his Commentary, though in 
his version this father has Lucifer, as 
that which is to be preferred. To this 
rendering, however, the structure of 
the verse is decidedly opposed ; the 
parallelism requiring Wwy32 377 to 
describe the person before his having 
fallen from heaven, just as D}%y win 
describes him previous to his having 
been felled to the ground, Any Im- 

erative interjected would spoil the 
pean and impair the force of the 
language. We must, therefore, with 
the LXX., Targ., Jerome, Saadias, 
Abenezra, Jarchi, Kimchi, Vitringa, 
Leo Juda, the Jewish Spanish, Lowth, 


Gesenius, Rosenmiiller, and Hitzig, 
refer 7 to the root 5, fo shine; 
and consider it as a verbal noun, 
formed with 72éré and Yod, instead of 
27, the regular Piel form, and so de- 
signed to be intensive in signification, 


The Arabic Jl», which is derived 
from ον, to shine, be resplendent, and 


designates the new moon, may be 
compared for the sake of illustration. 
Hitzig is of opinion that 977 was used 
exclusively for the Morning-star; LXX. 


ὁ ἑωσφόρος; Hexap. Syr. wasaa 
Ἰσι 2; Arab. Pol. eval ahs 
Ciptndl. This star the Rabbins also 
call 8722 2253, and the Arabs. δ) Ὁ δ)» the 


Shining Star, or the Shiner. Comp. 
ὁ ἀστὴρ ὁ λαμπρὸς ὁ πρωϊνός, Rey. xxi. 
16, and φωσφόρος, 2 Pet. i. 19.—The 
idiomatic ὙΠ 3, son of the morning, de- 
noting that which belongs to, or 
appears at that time, the LXX. render 
ὁ πρωὶ ἀνατέλλων. The application of 
this passage to Satan, and to the fall 
of the apostate angels, is one of those 
gross perversions of Sacred Writ 
which so extensively obtain, and 
which are to be traced to a proneness 
to seek for more in any given passage 
than it really contains, a disposition 
to be influenced by sound rather than 
by sense, and an implicit faith in 
received interpretations. “ Quum,” 
says Calvin, “temere arripiuntur 
Scripturze loci, nec attenditur con- 
textus, hos errores passim oboriri 
mirum non est.” Comm. iz loc. The 
scope and connexion shew that none 
but the king of Babylon is meant. In 
the figurative language of the Hebrews, 


3312, a star, like LS, with the Arabs, 


signifies an illustrious prince or king. 


CHAP. XIV.]| 


ISAIAH. 


133 


How thou art felled to the ground, 
That didst discomfit the nations ! 
13 Thou saidst in thine heart, I will scale the heavens ; 
Above the stars of God I will raise my throne ; 
Yea, I will sit on the mount of the assembly, in the recesses of 


the north ; 


14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; 


See Numb. xxiv. 17; and comp., for 
this acceptation, Rev. ii. 28, and xxii. 
16. The monarch here referred to, 
having outshone all other kings in 
royal splendour, is compared to the 
harbinger of day, whose _brilliancy 
surpasses that of the surrounding 
stars. Falling from heaven denotes 
a sudden political overthrow—a re- 
moval from the position of high 
and conspicuous dignity formerly 
occupied. Comp. Rey. vi. 13, viii. 10. 

In the latter half of the verse the 
metaphor is changed, and that of a tall 
majestic tree is introduced, which, on 
being felled, lies prostrate on the 
ground. Comp. Ezek. xxxi. and Dan. 
iv. 10O—15, Diaty win Hitzig ren- 
ders, Who didst extend thy branches over 
the pecople—a sense which would 
admirably agree with the metaphor 
of a tree affording shelter to all who 
are under its branches; but this in- 
terpretation cannot be philologically 
sustained. The Jewish interpretation 
of casting lots over the nations is 
won, Arab. Uri, 
rapuit, abripuit, signifies to throw down, 
lay or spread on the ground, &c. ; hence 
to overthrow or discompt an enemy. Fol- 
lowed by %, it indicates the state of 
subjection in which the prostrate 
nations were held by the Babylonian 
sway, or the triumphant manner in 
which that sway had been established 
and maintained. Comp. Exod. xvii. 
13, only Ὁ is there properly omitted, 
the verb being employed by Moses to 
express a simple victory, and not con- 
tinued mastery. 

13, 14. In order to aggravate the 
downfal of the Babylonian monarch, 
the Jews, not content with depicting 
the elevated political position which 
he had occupied, proceed to describe 


equally untendble. 


the pride and arrogance of his heart, 
which had led him to aspire to an 
equality with the Deity himself. By 
most interpreters the language is 
taken figuratively in application to the 
Jewish state, with its principal offi- 
cers, the temple, and its Lord: but, 
how suitable soever such expressions 
might be in the mouth of a Jew, or of 
one intimately acquainted with He- 
brew modes of speech, they seem 
quite inappropriate if used in the 
same sense by the king of Babylon. 
Before this triumphant ode is sup- 
posed to be sung, that monarch had 
not only purposed to go up against 
Jerusalem, but had actually carried 
his purpose into effect, dethroning 
the king, subverting the temple, and 
carrying the people away into cap- 
tivity. The obvious bearing of the 
language, however, implies, that the 
proud and haughty purposes couched 
in it had not been attained, and were, 
indeed, such as to be utterly unattain- 
able. We are, therefore, compelled 
to relinquish the common interpreta- 
tion, which has been supported by 
none more ably than by Vitringa, and 
adopt that which was first obscurely 
hinted at by the LXX., was rendered 
more definite by Theodoret, and has 
been more fully brought out by 
Michaelis in his Supplem. ad Lexx. 
Heb. No. 1009, and by Rosenmiller, 
Gesenius, and Hitzig, in their com- 
mentaries on the place ; viz. that the 
monarch of Babylon gives utterance 
to sentiments founded on the re- 
presentations of Asiatic mythology. 
While the Greeks had their Olympus, 
and the Hindoos their Meru, the 


ancient Persians had their ays), Llburs, 
or on 9 Hlborj, ἃ name still given 
R 


184 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XIV. 


I will make myself like the Most High. 


to the highest mountain in the Cau- 
casian range. which is upwards of 
13,000 feet above the level of the 
Black Sea. According to the Bunde- 
sheh, one of the books of the Parsees, 
this mountain rose, by the will of 
Ormuzd, when the world was created, 
during the first two hundred years, to 
the starry heavens; during the next 
two, to the sphere of the moon ; during 
the third two, to that of the sun ; 
and during the fourth two, to the 
region of primeval light. Here is ¢he 
throne of Ormuzd, the congregation of 
the living, the pure region of light, 
where there is neither enemy, dark- 
ness, nor death. Thither, it is said, 
the enemy dares not ascend as the domi- 
neering lord, for there walks the great 
king, the Sun, who is appointed Am- 
shaspand over all things, &c. 

The Babylonians, being much ad- 
dicted to the cultivation of astronomy, 
could not but have been familiar with 
those mythological fables which were 
mixed up with the cosmogonies of the 
ancients ; and doubtless the monarchs 
who maintained at their courts those 
who were skilled in such matters, 
Dan. ii. 2, 10, 27, v. 7, must have like- 
wise been more or less acquainted 
with them. It was, therefore, per- 
fectly natural for them, when arro- 
gantly aftecting divine honours, to 
form the purpose of scaling the Cau- 
casus; and, rising above the region of 
the clouds and stars, of taking pos- 
session of the throne of Deity, which 
they imagined to be on the summit of 
its highest mountain.—97233, stars of 
God, the Genitive of cause; stars 
which God hath made: as ΠΝ, 
cedars which God hath planted, 7.e. 
of natural growth, Ps. Ixxx. 11; 8°17, 
mountains which God hath made, Ps. 
XXXvi. 7. δ, from ‘x, fo be strong, 
powerful, is used in poetry and sub- 
lime prophetic style in the same way 
as OW; but never in prose, except it 
be followed either by a pronominal 
suffix, an adjective, or some qualifying 
epithet. According to Sanchoniathon, 
il or Ii was the name by which the 
Pheenicians designated Saturn ; and 
Damasc. apud Photium informs us, 
that they and the Syriazs called him 


Hil, Bel, and Bolathon. Gesen. Thes. 
in voc. It might, therefore, be appro- 
priately used by the king of Babylon, 
—wwio, the mount of assembly, is Al- 
borj, considered as the place where 
the living, i.e. the blessed, are congre- 
gated —jer ney, the recesses, ovr the re- 
mote regions of the North; UXX. ra 
ὄρη τὰ ὑψηλὰ τὰ πρὸς Boppav, which 
Theodoret explains, ὄρος δὲ ὑψηλὸν 
εἶναι λέγεται βοῤῥάθεν ᾽᾿ΑΔσσυρίων καὶ 
Μήδων, ἀπὸ τούτων τὰ Σκυθικὰ διορίζον 
ἔθνη, πάντων τῶν κατὰ τὴν οἰκουμένην 
ὄρων ὑψηλότατον ; language which, in 
such connexion, can only apply to the 
mountains of the Caucasus. 9% sig- 
nifies the thigh or haunch, and figura- 
tively the hinder, innermost, remotest 
parts of any thing. As thus used of 
inanimate objects. it is almost always 
in the dual, as in the present instance. 
Comp. for the geographical use of the 
term, Judg. xix. 1, 18; Isa. xxxvii. 
24; Jer. vi. 22, xxv. 32; and for the 
application of other members of the 
human body in a geographical sense, 
the words tk, P, 902, &e.—yrv) Wa. 
The Dagesh in 7 is compensative for 
the of the Hithpael Conjug., in 
which the verb is aptly put to express 
the self-sufficient pride of the am- 
bitious monarch. ἡ ν, the Highest, 
Most High, is another of those Divine 
names common to the Hebrews. Sy- 
rians, and Pheenicians. Thus San- 
choniathon in Euseb., Κατὰ τούτους 
γίνεται τὶς ᾿Ελιοὺν καλούμενους ὕψιστος. 
The name is sometimes used by itself 
in Hebrew ; but more commonly it is 
coupled with °8, ΘΠ, and 77. The 
designation ΚΣ 98 occurs thrice in the 
brief notice of Melchizedek, Gen. xiv. 
17—23. The term being here em- 
ployed in the singular, and not in the 
plural as in the <Alonim valonoth, the 
highest gods and goddesses of Plautus, 
Peen. v. 1. 1, does not imply that the 
king of Babylon was a monotheist. 
In all the modifications of Polytheism, 
one god has been regarded as superior 
to the rest. Not satisfied with making 
himself equal to any of the inferior 
deities, his ambition led him to aspire 
after an equality with the Supreme. 
Compare as parallels, Ezek. xxviii. 2; 
2 Thess. ii. 4. 


CHAP. XIV.] 


15 
To the recesses of the pit. 
16 


ISAIAH. 


135 


But thou art brought down to Sheol, 


Those that see thee shall gaze at thee, 


They shall view thee attentively, [and say :] 
Is this the man that made the earth to tremble ? 


That shook the kingdoms ? 
17 
And laid waste its cities, 


That made the world a wilderness, 


And sent not his prisoners home ? 


18 


All the kings of the nations, all of them, 


Lie in state, each in his own sepulchre ; 


15. Here %x% contrasts with the 
different phrases employed in the 
preceding verse to express the highest 
elevation, just as 2727 does with 
pes ney. Comp. Matt. xi. 23. wWaoensy 
means ¢he deepest recesses of Sheol, into 
which the king is represented as 
having been precipitated. 

16. He is now exhibited as an 
object of astonishment. Spectators 
crowd around him; and, after con- 
templating his prostrate condition, 
add to his misery by adverting in 
pointed terms to his former power 
over the nations of the earth.—At 
the Athnach, Wx?, is understood, but 
could not with any propriety have 
been expressed in the text.—m2v is 
not much in use, but signifies, in 
Hiphil, ¢o ixspect narrowly, to look at 
any object with intense interest. The 
Hithpa. 2} 3) is also peculiarly em- 
phatic. It signifies, 4o consider and 
reconsider ; and implies that the per- 
sons spoken of had some difficulty in 
persuading themselves that the de- 
graded object before them could really 
be the king of Babylon. 

17. The pronom. suffix in ™, and 
yyox, belongs to different antecedents: 
the former to 3m, and the latter to 
the king, understood. The local 7 in 
m3, shews that the word is to be 
taken in the sense of homewards, and 
does not refer to a prison, as our 
translators, after Jerome and others, 
have supposed. Thus, however, Cover- 
dale, which let not his prisoners go home. 
mamma 8? ig strongly elliptical. In 
full the sentence would be nn x) 
ma one Sy orp. It has ever been 


regarded as indicating the utmost 
cruelty, to refuse the exchange or 
return of prisoners taken in war. 
18,19. A fresh contrast, affording 
another cutting ground of insult to 
degraded majesty. In accordance to 
the Oriental custom οἵ erecting 
splendid mausoleums for kings and 
other great men, in the sides of which 
were subordinate apartments or ceils 
fitted for the reception of the dead 
bodies, and of depositing them in 
these apartments, after the previous 
funeral solemnities had been com- 
pleted, all the other kings of the earth 
are represented as occupying in silent 
state the chambers allotted to them ; 
whereas to the king of Babylon the 
rites of sepulture are denied; no 
royal mausoleum receives his dead 
body; nor is it committed to a com- 
mon grave, but is left to putrefy on 
the ground. For an illustration of 
the sepulchres of the ancients, see 
note on chap. xxii. 16.—— FD? ANI 
does not imply that the king had 
been buried and afterwards thrown 
out of his sepulchre, that he might 
be exposed as here described. The Ὁ 
is used absolutely, signifying iz a state 
of separation from, at a distance from, 
without, or destitute of, and is quite 
independent of the verb. Without 
thy grave, means, without being de- 
posited in the sepulchre which thou 
hadst prepared for thyself, or which 
was destined for thee. Comp. Jer. 
xxii. 19.—a2yn) ἼΞ2) is a branch which 
has been cut down, and left to rot on 
the ground, and, in its corrupt state, 
is loathed by all who approach it.— 


136 ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XIV. 


19 But thou art cast away, deprived of thy grave, 


Like a detested branch ; 


Covered with the slain, the pierced by the sword, 
Who go down to the stones of the pit ; 
Like a carcase, trodden under foot. 

20 'Thou shalt not be joined with them in burial, 
Because thou hast destroyed thy country, 


And slain thy people: 


The race of evil doers shall never be named. 
21 Prepare slaughter for his children, 


2) our translators, with some others, 
consider to be a construct noun, and 
supply a 2 before it; but it is the 
Pah. Part. in construction, and refers 
to the dead body of the king lying in 
the mass of the slain, by whom it 

as, the Part. in Pual 


of yo, Arab. wr to pierce through, 


thrust.a sword into any one. It occurs 
only here, and Gen. χὶν. 17, in which 
latter passage Parkhurst thinks it 
should be rendered goad, egg on by 
pricking the animals; but the Ara- 
maic sense of /oading seems prefer- 
able.—Vaaw, the stones of the pit, the 
LXX. render ἅδου, Symm. θεμέλια 
λάκκου, Vulg. fundamenta laci, Luth. 
den Steinhaufen der Holle; whereas 
some explain the phrase to mean 
such heaps of stones as are raised 
over dead bodies in the open field. 
There can scarcely be a doubt that it 
refers to the sarcophagi, or stone coffins, 
in which persons of distinction were 
buried, and which, from their size, 
and their being placed in the cham- 
bers built in, or dug out of, the 
sides of the mausoleum, might, with 
the strictest propriety, be called its 
stones, See a representation of them 
in Calmet, 8vo. edit. art, Sepulchre. 
Splendid specimens are exhibited in 
the British Museum. Such sarcophagi 
have been found containing human 
skeletons, in the immense northerly 
mass of ruins near Babylon, called the 
Mujelibé. osenm. in Bib. Cab, vol. 11. 
p- 18. Warn, those who go down to the 
pit, is in frequent use to denote mor- 
tal men generally, such as must soon 
descend into the grave: comp. x8 TY, 
Job vii. 93 MMH nN, Job xxxiii. 24; 


but W323 5x "NY describes a particular 
class of mortals—princes and nobles, 
for whom a more honourable sepulture 
was prepared. While the bodies of 
the slain courtiers and captains, with 
which that of the king of Babylon was 
covered, should be sought out, and 
after having been embalmed, placed, 
each in its sarcophagus, in the sub- 
terranean chambers, his would be left, 
no one being able to recognise it, from 
the mangled state to which it had 
been reduced, and the disfiguration it 
had undergone by being trampled 
upon by the multitude. D2 735) con- 
nects closely with 2m? 1223, only the 
prepositive 2 is the Cuph veritatis. 
This prophecy was minutely fulfilled. 
On entering the city, the army of Cyrus 
marched straight to the palace; and 
meeting the king, who was coming out 
sword in hand, they slew him, and 
put all who followed him to the sword; 
and, though Xenophon specially no- 
tices the permission given to bury 
the dead, he takes no notice whatever 
of the royal corpse. He only speaks 
of him as τὸν ἀνόσιον βασιλέα. Cyro- 
peed. lib. vii. ch. v. 29, 32, 34. 

20. Before quitting the subject, the 
Jews once more exult over the desti- 
tute condition of the fallen monarch, 
by reminding him that he should not 
participate in the rites of sepulture 
performed upon those who had been 
slain in his presence, and that no 
monument should perpetuate his 
memory, or that of his family. δ 
DY? NI, shall not be called, named, 
read, implying that no inscription 
should tell where he lay. 

21. The ode concludes with the de- 
nouncement of a curse on the children 


Se ee 


CHAP. XIV. | 


ISATAH. 


137 


For the iniquity of their fathers ; 
That they may not rise, and possess the land, 
And fill the face of the world with cities. 


22 


For I will arise against them, saith Jehovah of Hosts ; 


And I will cut off from Babylon name and remnant, 
Progeny and offspring, saith Jehovah. 


of water ; 


And I will make her the possession of the porcupine, and pools 


And will sweep her completely out with the besom of de- 


struction, 


Saith Jehovah of Hosts. 


of the Babylonian king. They should 
reap the fruit of their ancestors’ guilt : 
the dynasty would be entirely set 
aside by the Persian rule. To prevent 
the revival of an ancient dynasty, 
it has very often been the practice 
to make away with all who possessed 
hereditary claims to the throne.— 
or, Hitzig takes to be a false reading 
for DY, heaps, ruins, the result of fresh 
wars ; but it is a mere conjecture. 
The LXX., Targ., Syr., Rosenmiiller, 
and Gesenius, render it exemies; but 
Aquila, Symm., Theod., Vulg. and 
Saadias, have cities, which Kimchi 
considers to be the more natural of 
the two interpretations. Reference 
is had to the founding of new cities 
and colonies, which a revival of the 
ancient power might soon have en- 
abled them to do. 

22, 23. These two verses contain a 
solemn declaration on the part of 
Jehovah, that he would make an end 
not only of the royal family, but of 
the entire population, and convert the 
city into an uninhabitable marsh. 
The former took place on its capture 
by Cyrus ; the latter progressively in 
the course of ages. See chap. xiil. 1. 
—The nouns, 732) 72) wh DW, are ac- 
cumulated for the sake of effect, 
order to express the completeness of 
the extinction. The alliteration also 
deserves notice. For 733, Gesenius 
very properly compares the Ethiop. 


WE: gens, cognatio. Pi, the root 
from which 72 is derived, occurs Ps. 


Ixxii. 17, in connexion with Dw, in the 
sense of being celebrated through the 


medium of a numerous posterity— 


Hep, Arab. Xs, Eth. PtH: pro- 


nounced, according to Hést and Fors- 
kal, ganfud : the porcupine, or the sea- 
ur chins which is said to abound about 
the mouths of the Euphrates.— 
REND PONOND, an exquisite finish to 
this unparalleled piece of prophetic 
composition. It is one of those in- 
stances in which the apparent mean- 
ness of the image is so compensated 
by the peculiar form of the expression, 
as to give it the character of the sub- 
lime. Twenty-two MSS., originally 
nine more, now by correction two, the 
Brixian, and another ancient edition, 
read ‘23023 in the plural: but the sin- 
gular is ‘decidedly preferable. What 
the words mean, Kimchi tells us the 
Rabbins could not make out till they 
heard an Arab female call to her com- 
panion, Oskoli tatithan, watati baithan, 
z.e. take the besom, and sweep the 
house. The Pilpel, or reduplicate 
form, both of the verb and the noun, 
gives great intensiveness to the mean- 


ing. Comp. lblb, in Kosegarten’s 


Annals of Taberist, i. p. 60. Ewald’s 
Gramm. § 235. Eng. translation. As to 
the root, Gesenius hesitates between 
nm or xm, and oO, The latter he 
adopts in his Thesaurus; but the 
former, of which he approves in his 
other Lexicons, and in his Commen- 
tary, seems preferable. It is approved 
by Winer and Lee. The LXX. render; 

θήσω αὐτὴν πηλοῦ βάραθρον cis ἀπώ- 
Aecay; from which it appears, that 
they derived the words from 0, 


198 ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XIV. 


24 Jehovah of Hosts hath sworn, saying, 
Verily as I have thought, so shall it be, 
And as I have purposed, so shall it stand. 
25 ΤῸ crush the Assyrian in my land, 
And to trample him on my mountains ; 
Then shall his yoke depart from them, 
And his burden be removed from their shoulder. 
26 This is the purpose that is formed concerning all the earth, 
And this is the hand that is stretched out over all the nations. 
27 For Jehovah of Hosts hath purposed, and who can disannul it ? 
It is his hand that is stretched out, and who can turn it back ? 


28 In the year in which Ahaz the king died, this sentence was 


pronounced. 


24—27. From his celebrated pre- 
diction respecting the more distant 
future, the prophet returns once more 
to the Assyrian invasion, the subject 
which most pressed upon his contem- 
poraries, being the calamity with 
which they were immediately threat- 
ened. Jehovah now declares by the 
mouth of Isaiah, in plain and explicit, 
but peremptory and forcible language, 
that it was his unalterable purpose to 
overthrow that foreign power in the 
Holy Land. lLowth attempts to iden- 
tify the Assyrian with the Baby- 
lonian foe; but though what he 
alleges is true, that in profane authors 
the names are interchangeable, yet 
the circumstance of the discomfiture 
taking place in Judea, ver. 25, suffi- 
ciently proves that the Assyrians pro- 
per are those to whom the prophet 
refers. These three verses obviously 
connect in application with chapters 
X.—xli.; yet not as a fragment that 
has been torn off from them, since 
there is no place in that portion which 
it can claim as its position. It is an 
independent oracle, pronounced on 
occasion of the delivery of the pro- 
pheey concerning Babylon; and its 
actual position furnishes an additional 
argument in favour of the genuineness 
of that prophecy. 

yaw), The verb fo swear, in Hebrew, 
is always used in the passive, in re- 
ference to the person who takes an 


oath, which would seem to intimate 
his being laid under the obligation which 
such an act involves—On ον, see 
note, chap. v. 9. Before D770 87 is an 
ellipsis of 3. The purposes of God 
are, like himself, immutable. See 
chap. xlvi. 10; Heb. vi. 17. For ‘ss, 
my land, comp. ver. 2 ; Hos. ix. 3; and 
for ‘1, my mountains, Ezek. xxxviii. 21, 
with xxxix, 2/4. Zech. xiv. 5. The 
mountains immediately about Jerusa- 
lem are specifically meant. See chap. 
xxxvi.2. The latter half of ver. 25 is 
almost a verbal repetition of chap. x. 
27: the meaning is the same.—In 
verses 26 and 27 it is declared that 
Jehovah’s purpose to punish the ene- 
mies of his people was not restricted 
to the Assyrians, but had for its 
object every nation throughout the 
earth which might set itself to afilict 
or oppress them. 


28. The section, from this verse to 
the end of the chapter, contains a dis- 
tinct prophecy against the PHILISTINES. 
This people were not aborigines of 
the country which they occupied, but, 


aan: to emigrate; UXX. generally 


ἀλλόφυλοι.) foreigners, who, according 
to Amos ix. 7, Jer. xlvii. 4, came from 
the island of Caphtor, or Crete, hence 
called On, Cherethites, or Cretans, 


EE ΒΟ 0 «0 «. σαν “ΘΒ ΌΨΟΨΌΩΝΙ 


CHAP. XIV.] 


ISAIAH. 


139 


29 Let not any part of thee rejoice, Ὁ Puiiisrra! 
Because the rod which smote thee is broken ; 


Ezek. xxv. 16; Zeph. ii. 5; 1 Sam. 
xxx.14,16. Both those who remained 
upon the island, and those who emi- 
grated, are stated, Gen. x. 14, to have 
descended from the Casluhim, an 
Egyptian colony. Having driven away 
the Avites, they took possession of the 
south-east coast of the Mediterranean, 
and had cities and kings as early as 
the days of Abraham. Though nomi- 
nally subdued by Joshua, they had in 
the time of Samuel five small king- 
doms or satrapies, and were first 
really brought into subjection by 
David, 2 Sam. viii. 1. They were, 
however, continually prone to revolt. 
In the reign of Jehoram, they, and 
their allies, the Arabs, made an in- 
cursion into Judah, and even plun- 
dered the royal palace; but during 
the reign of Uzziah they were kept 
quiet, in consequence of his having 
demolished the walls of their princi- 
pal cities, and built fortresses in dif- 
ferent parts of their country, 2 Chron. 
xxvi. 6,7. Asa chastisement of the 
wicked Ahaz, they were permitted 
again to invade the land ; and they 
appear so to have gloried in the ad- 
vantages they had gained, and in the 
prostrate condition of Jewish affairs, 
that the prophet was commissioned, 
a little before that king’s death, to 
deliver this prophecy against them. 

In our common version, the para- 
graph mark is placed at ver. 29, by 
which the present verse is made to 
assign the date of the preceding pro- 
phecy against Babylon ; but the cir- 
cumstance that the announcement of 
a xwd, or sentence, is always made at 
the commencement of a prophecy, 
shews that it here belongs to what 
follows. Instead of πὸ, “λας, Ken- 
nicott’s Cod. 351, reads ww, Uzziah, 
whom several commentators suppose 
to be intended, on account of the 
yoke which he imposed upon the 
Philistines. It is, however, altogether 
destitute of critical support, and the 
hypothesis that he is _ specifically 
meant, cannot be sustained. That 
the prophecy was delivered before the 
death of Ahaz, see chap. vi. 1. 


29. mB is called by Josephus, 
Antiq. i. 6, 2, Παλαιστίνη, in strict 
application to the country occupied 
by the Philistines: but viii. 10, 3, he 
extends to the whole country of the 
Israelites the name of Palestine, by 
which it has been known to the pre- 
sent time.—By the ‘‘rod which smote” 
the Philistines, is meant the Jewish 
power, which had, as noticed above, 
punished them in the days of Uzziah, 
but was now broken in those of Ahaz, 
partly by the Syrians and Israelites, 
partly by the inroads of the Edomites 
and Philistines, and partly by Tiglath- 
pileser, 2 Chron. xxviii. To repress 
their joy at these disastrous events, 
the prophet tells them. in highly figu- 
rative language, that from the royal 
house of Judah, a prince should arise, 
who would prove more formidable and 
destructive to them than his prede- 
cessors. This prince was Hezekiah, 
who “smote the Philistines even unto 
Gaza, and the borders thereof, from 
the tower of the watchmen to the 
fenced city,” 2 Kings xviii. 8 —With 
respect to the figures employed, as 
Calvin well remarks, there is nothing 
ignominious in them, since all they 
are intended to convey, is the idea of 
the injury to be inflicted on the 
enemy. On YD, see note on chap. xi. 
7.— FEIN Ww, LXX. ὄφεις werapevor, 
is of more difficult interpretation. 
Michaelis in his Orient. Biblioth. v. 
164, thinks it is only another name 
for the basilisk, just mentioned ; but 
his opinion is faucifully supported. 
That a species of serpent is meant, is 
clear from Numb. xxi. 6, 8, where we 
read of DEWwI DWN, fiery serpents. 
They appear to have had this name 
given to them on account of their v/vid 
Jiery colour, being somewhat like the 
copper-coloured snake in appearance ; 
on which account, a serpent of copper 
or brass was set up, to which the bit- 
ten Israelites were to look, in order to 
be healed. Gott. Hein. von Schubert, 
in his Travels in the East, Zweit. 
Band. Seit. 406, Erlangen, 1839, de- 
scribes a large serpent which he saw, 
and which the Arabs aftirmed abounded 


140 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XIV. 


For out of the root of the serpent shall come forth a basilisk, 
And his fruit shall be a flymg serpent. 


30 


Then shall the first-born of the poor feed, 


And the needy shall lie down in security ; 
But 1 will kill thy root with famine, 
And thy remnant shall be slain. 


91 


Howl, O gate! ery aloud, O city! 


O Philistia! thou art entirely dissolved ; 


in this region, as full of fiery red spots 
and undulating stripes, and, judging 
from the structure of its teeth, one of 
the most poisonous of its species. The 
most remarkable circumstance con- 
nected with those described here and 
chap. xxx. 6, is that of their flying: 
no serpents now in existence being 
known to naturalists to have wings, 
from which it is inferred that they 
never did exist. There can, however, 
be no doubt that some of the most 
respectable authorities among the 
ancients speak of winged or flying 
serpents, on occasions which would 
lead us to suppose that they are not 
treating of the fabulous, but of facts 
known to themselves and their con- 
temporaries. See Herod. lib. 1]. 75, 
iii. 107 ; lian, Hist. Animal. lib. 1]. 
cap. 28; Joseph. Antiq. lib. 11. 10, 2; 
Cicero de Nat. Deor. i. 36; Mela, 
11. 9; Amm. Marcellin. xxii. Some 
of these writers refer them _ to 
the great Arabian desert, as does 
Isaiah, chap. xxx. 6; and we must 
conclude either that a species is de- 
scribed which has become extinct, or 
that the kind is meant which Niebuhr 
mentions in his Description of Arabia, 
which, instead of descending from a 
tree, in order to ascend another, make 
a sudden spring from the one to the 
other, and on this account are called 
Jing serpents by the modern Arabs. 
So much is certain, that by 7b Ay, 
the prophet intended a serpent whose 
appearance was formidable, and its 
bite peculiarly nocuous. The whole 
passage is applied in the Targ. to 
the Messiah, which Rosenmiiller ap- 
proves ! 

30. In consequence of the effectual 
subjugation of the Philistines by 
Hezekiah, the very poorest of the 
inhabitants of Judah should live in 


security: whereas, the power of the 
Philistines should be annihilated. As 
"123 signifies figuratively what is the 
chief or most eminent in degree, D7 "133, 
the first-born of the poor, raeans the 
very poorest. Comp. ny2 23, the 
Jirst-bora of death, i.e. the most terrible 
death, Job xviii. 13. The Arabs call 


fevers, ree 8} wooly, the daughters of 


fate, thereby meaning death, which 
somewhat approximates to this idiom. 
—w, root, in this verse, corresponds 
in meaning to the same word as 
occurring ver. 29; only it is there 
applied to the royal house of Judah ; 
whereas here it applies to that of the 
Philistines. The metaphor is taken 
from the vegetable kingdom.—17 is 
to be taken impersonally, and rendered 
passively. 

31. Vitringa and Gesenius are of 
opinion, that an Assyrian invasion of 
Philistia is here predicted. There is 
no necessity, however, for abandoning 
the idea of the Jewish army marching 
against the Philistines under Heze- 
kiah. Considering the geographical 
position of their country in relation 
to that of Judah, there is precisely 
the same propriety in describing the 
Jews as coming from the North, as 
there is in describing the Assyrians 
and Babylonians as coming from that 
quarter against Jerusalem. The pro- 
phet repeats with much effect, mo. 
722, which he had employed in the 
introduction of the prophecy, ver. 29. 
—By smoke ave meant the clouds of 
dust resembling smoke, produced by 
the march of an army. 


“Ac simul Aineas fumantes pulvere 
Campos 

Prospexit longé, Laurentiaque agmina 
vidit.”—Aneid, lib, xi. 908. 


CHAP. ΧΥ͂.] 


ISAIAH. 


141 


For out of the North cometh a smoke, 
And there is no straggler among his hosts. 
32 What answer shall then be given to the messengers of the 


nations ? 


That Jehovah hath founded Zion, 
And in her the afflicted of his people find refuge. 


—riyina ὙΠ} psi, There shall be no strag- 
gler in his hosts. TB, Arab. do, ¢o 


separate, be alone, expresses, in the 
participle, one who is disjoined from 
others, a straggling soldier, one who 
from infirmity or weariness is obliged 
to quit the ranks and lag behind. 
wid, being derived from Ὁ), ¢o fix 
a place or time of meeting, signifies 
such time, or the assembly then and 
there convened. In no other passage 
is the term applied to congregated 
hosts, but such seems clearly to be its 
meaning in this place. The suff. in 
yin refers to the 72, and Apia AWD, 
ver, 29. 

32. 132 is taken collectively by the 
LXX., Aq., Symm., Theod., Targ., 
Syr., Saad.; and Kennicott’s Cod. 
145, reads 0%3, which is right as to 
the meaning. It was customary for 
foreign powers to send. messengers to 
any state with which they were at 
peace, but which was carrying on war 


in some other direction, to ascertain 
the success of its arms. In the true 
spirit of the theocracy, the reply to 
such ambassadors, in the present case, 
is, not that their arms were success- 
ful, but that Jehovah was the Founder 
of their state, and afforded them the 
surest ground of confidence. Gesenius 
and some others suppose Philistine 
ambassadors to be intended, but this 
seems less probable. —Instead of "N79, 
messengers, the LXX., and the other 
early Greek versions, ” read 20, kings ; 

my, however, better agrees with the 
former. The sentiment conveyed at 
the end of the verse is, in such con- 
nexion, quite compatible with trust 
in God: trusting in what God has 
done, or in what is his work, and 
sufficient for the ends which he de- 
signs by it, is virtually trusting in 
himself. Very different was the false 
confidence of the hypocritical Jews, 
Jer, vil. 4, 


CHAPTERS XV. XVI. 


THE SENTENCE OF MOAB. 


These two chapters contain one connected prophecy against Moan. The 
Moabites, who were descended from Lot, occupied the region on the east of 
the Dead Sea and the river Jordan, which had originally been inhabited by 
the gigantic Emim. Previous, however, to the occupation of Canaan by 
the Israelites, they were driven southward over the Arnon, which river 
henceforth became their northern boundary. The Israelites spared them 
on their march from the Arabian desert; and, for some time, they appear 
to have lived on peaceable terms with each other; but in the days of the 


5 


142 ISAIAH. [CHAP. XV. 


Judges hostilities broke out, in consequence of which the Hebrew tribes 
beyond Jordan, and in the south of Palestine, were subjugated by the 
Moabites eighteen years, Judg. iii. 14. The latter were then expelled from 
the Hebrew territory; and were ultimately themselves brought into subjec- 
tion by David ;. in which state they continued till they revolted along with 
the ten tribes, and attached themselves to the house of Israel. Soon after 
the death of Ahab, they refused the annual tribute, and succeeded in main- 
taining their independence till the time of the Babylonian invasion, when, 
in all probability, the prophecies contained in these chapters were fulfilled. 
See Jer. xlvii.; Joseph. Antiq. x. 9. 7. They were idolaters, and worshipped 
Chemosh and Baal-peor. Their idolatry was a mixture of sensuality and 
cruelty, Numb. xxv. 1, &c.; 2 Kings iii. 27. 

Several recent German writers ascribe the prophecy to Jeremiah. This Gese- 
nius considers to be utterly inadmissible; yet, unwilling to allow that it 
was written by Isaiah, he attributes it to some contemporary or earlier 
prophet. At the same time he is obliged to grant, that it can hardly be 
satisfactorily proved’ not to have been written by Isaiah. Comm. p. 509. 
Hitzig is of opinion that it is the prophecy of Jonah, mentioned 2 Kings 
xiv. 25. 

The parallel portions of Jeremiah’s prophecy (chap. xlviii.) are in part verbally 
the same with that contained in these chapters of Isaiah, and partly an 
altered and amplified edition of it. 

The subjects of the prediction are: the sudden attack and destruction of the 
two principal cities of Moab, xv. 1; the universal distress and mourning 
which ensue, 2—5; and the destitute and fugitive condition to which the 
inhabitants of the country are reduced, 6—9. To procure admission, for 
safety, into Judah, they are exhorted to pay the tribute which had been 
withheld, xvi. 1; they then implore protection, assuring the Jews that their 
extending it to them would meet with its reward in the perpetuity of the 
kingdom, 2—5; on which the prophet reminds them of their former 
treacheries, and utters lamentations over them of the most pitiable descrip- 
tion, 6—11. The prophecy concludes with a declaration of the fruitless 
application which the Moabites would make to their gods to deliver them, 
12. The last two verses of the chapter contain a postscript, added; by some 
unknown hand, only three years before the accomplishment of the pre- 
dictions took place. 


1 ASSUREDLY in the night of assault Ar-Moab is destroyed; 


1. There is nothing answering to 5 
in the LXX. and Syr., but this con- 
junction frequently occurs at the com- 
mencement of a prediction, in order 
to express the certainty of its fulfil- 
ment. See chap. xxv. 10. Calmet 
conjectured, that in 72 the 3 has taken 


the place of 3, so that the word may 
originally have read 3, entirely ; and 
this conjecture has been adopted by 
Boothroyd and Jenour. There is, 
however, no necessity for altering the 
text. 2 is the less usual form of 72%, 
night, in construction with 11, which 


CHAP. XV. | 


ISATAH. 


143 


Assuredly in the night of assault Kir-Moab is destroyed. 
2 They go up to the temple, and to Dibon, to the high places, to 


weep ; 


Upon Nebo and upon Medeba, Moab howleth : 


is a verbal noun, from the Infin. of 
Pual. The verb, in the intensive con- 
jugations, conveys the idea of violent 
assault and destruction; yet is less 
strong in signification than 7273, which 
denotes utter extinction. Doderlein and 
Dathe translate, wa nocte, supposing 
the facility with which the destruction 
was effected to be meant.—On 727, 
see chap. vi. 5.——axinw, Ar-Moad. 
Aq. and Symm. render 1, by πόλις, 
which is its proper meaning ; but as it 
is never used, in the singular, of any 
city, but the metropolis of Moab, it is, 
with Theod., to be retained as a proper 
name. See Numb. xxi. 15 ; Deut. ii. 
9 ; where it occurs without 18>. The 
Greeks gave it the name of ’ApeozoNts, 
in which its original Hebrew designa- 
tion appears, though they seem to 
have understood by the term uris 
Martis. It was known by this name 
as late as the sixth century, and was 
then the seat of a bishop. It was 
also called, on account of its size, 
“Ῥαβαθμώμ and “Ῥαβαθμώμα, a corrup- 
tion of asi2 N32, to which correspond 
ἀν, Rabbah, and Le, Mab, of the 


modern Arabs. It was situated at 
some distance to the south of the 
river Arnon. Its ruins were dis- 
covered by Seetzen, among which he 
found the remains of an ancient tem- 
ple, consisting of portions of the wall 
and pillars—asiavp, Kir-Moub, was 
another Moabitish city, six or eight 
miles south of Ar, the same as Dy V7, 
chap. xvi. 11; Jer. xlviii. 31, 36; and 
nw v?, chap. xvi. 7; 2 Kings 111. 25. 
It was, as the name imports, the wall 
or fortress of Moab ; LXX. τὸ τεῖχος ; 
situated in the south of the country, 
on a very steep, and, in many places, 
perpendicular limestone hill, at the 
commencement of a deep valley, called 


Wady Karrak, Τὸ is now called 2) 0), 


Karrak, or Kerek, and was known by 
the same name to the Greek and 
Roman writers of the later age. 


Comp. Κάρακα, 2 Mace. xii. 17; and 
Χαρακμῶβα, in Ptolemy and Stephen 
of Byzant. It was a place of great 
strength, and was occupied with ad- 
vantage during the Crusades. Abul- 
feda, in the fourteenth century, speaks 
of it as impregnable. It is distant 
from Ar-Moab about twenty miles ; 
and, when visited by Burckhardt in 
1812, was inhabited by about four 
hundred Turkish, and one hundred 
and fifty Christian families.—The two 
principal cities being taken and de- 
stroyed, all further resistance on the 
part of the Moabites was hopeless ; 
on which account no mention is made 
of the destruction of any of the other 
cities. 

2. This and the following verses de- 
scribe the universal mourning to which 
the inhabitants of Moab abggoned 
themselves ; and here, as at chap. xvi. 
12, their application to their idols for 
help is distinctly recognised.—After 
the Targ. and Syr., Lowth rejects the 
copulative 1 in 2), and connecting 
}2rTMa3, so as to form one name, ren- 
ders: “He goeth up to Beth-dibon.” 
As we are not at liberty, however, on 
such slender authority, to cancel the 
4, and as the article in ™37 forms an 
insuperable objection to such construc- 
tion, this word must be taken by itself, 
as indicating the place whither the 
Moabites are said to have gone up. 
Nor can there be any doubt that it 
denotes the chief temple, or that of 
Chemosh; the article distinguishing 
it as that which was eminent. It is 
called προ, the sanctuary or temple, 
chap. xvi. 12. Comp. for such use of 
ma, 1 Sam. v. 2, 5; Isa. xxxvil. 38. 
What corroborates this view, is the 
occurrence of nin39, the high places, in 
the following clause ; which places of 
idolatrous worship were common 1n 
Moab and the surrounding countries. 
Thus Balak first took Balaam up to 
“the high places of Baal ;” then “to 
the top of Pisgah ;” and afterwards 
“to the top of Peor,” evidently on the 


144 


On all their heads is baldness ; 


Every beard is cut off. 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XV. 


3 In his streets they gird on sackcloth ; 


principle of their being peculiarly ac- 
ceptable as religious localities.—The 
nomin. to πον, is Moab, understood, or, 
the inhabitants taken collectively.— 
prt, Dibon, spelt po, ver. 9, now called 
Diban, was a town situated at some 
distance to the north of the Arnon, in 
a magnificent plain, and close to two 
elevated hills, on which, in all proba- 
bility, the nina here mentioned had 
been constructed. It was built by the 
Gadites, Numb. xxxii. 34, hence called 
apm, Numb. xxxiii. 45, 46; it was 
afterwards assigned to the Reubenites, 
Josh. xiii. 17; but finally reverted to 
the Moabites. By a common figure, 
Dibon is here put for its inhabitants. 
The 5 in ‘22? expresses state or con- 
dition.—in, Nebo, was a mountain be- 
longing to the chain of Abarim, near 
the northern extremity of the Dead 
Sea ; and x2?9, Medeba, a conical hill, 
with afown of the same name built 
upon its crest, at a short distance to 
the south of Heshbon. Its present 
ruins are about two miles in circum- 
ference. The former mountain ap- 
pears to have derived its name from 
the Babylonian idol of that name, see 
chap. xlvi. 1, and most probably was 
the site of one of his temples.—D6der- 
lein, Dathe, and Rosenmiiller, render 
%, de, propter, and suppose the meaning 
to be, that Moab howled on account of 
the destruction of the cities so called ; 
but there seems rather to be a refer- 
ence to the inhabitants of the north- 
ern plains having gone up to these 
places for religious purposes, where 
they mingled the most pitiable wail- 
ings with their rites. The entire 
‘structure of the verse favours this in- 
terpretation.—”, here and ver. 3, a 
peculiar punctuation of Hiphil, which 
has not yet been satisfactorily ac- 
counted for. The most probable rea- 
son is, that it is a contraction of >>, 
occurring chap. 111. 5, in which the 
characteristic 7 is retained. Comp. 
puim, for yw, 1 Sam. xvii. 47; 2778 
for 2hx, Ps. xxviii. 7. Comp. also 
ror, Job xxiv. 21, and »™, in Kal, Ps. 


CXXxvili. 6; and see Gesen. Lehrg. pp. 
388, 389, and Ewald’s Heb. Gram. § 
284, Eng. trans.—Instead of ves, 
three of Kennicott’s MSS. and two of 
De Rossi’s, read Ux, but this is in all 
probability a correction from Jer. xlviii. 
37. One of De Rossi’s has om, 
The punctuation is otherwise irregular 
for 1s1.—Before %, twenty-two MSS., 
originally seven more, and now one ; 
the Soncin. Ed. of the whole Bible, 
and also that of the Prophets; and 
the Targ., Syr., and Vulg., supply 1.— 
Instead of 7173, the reading 273, which 
is that of Jer. xlviii. 37, is found in 
forty-nine MSS. and upwards of thirty 
printed editions: while in Jer., 7273 
is found in ten MSS., originally in six 
more, and apparently in another. The 
difference consists merely in the in- 
terchange of the similar letters 7 and 5. 
In YB, which signifies fo fell, cut down, 
or hew, as a tree, there is something 
violent as applied to the beard; where- 
as, D2 signifying ¢o scrape or shave off 
the hair, is the more appropriate term: 
but as Gesenius remarks, the former 
seems to have been purposely selected 
by Isaiah, in order strongly to indicate 
the harsh and barbarous manner in 
which the operation would, under the 
peculiar circumstances, be performed, 
in opposition to slow and careful shav- 
ing. The LXX. and Saad. decidedly 
support the common reading. Cut- 
ting off the hair, and removing the 
beard, have been customary among 
most nations as tokens of mourning. 
Comp. Jer. xvi. 6; Amos vill. 10; 
Micah i. 16. 

3. γ᾽ Ὄπ, lit. fo bind a piece of sack- 
cloth round the loins, but used, in a 
more extended sense, for putting it 
on the body generally. pv, a word 
found in most languages, signifying a 
coarse kind of cloth,commonly made of 
hair, and used for sacks, but also for 
garments, as indicative of humiliation, 
self-denial, and especially of deep 
mourning. It was worn on the death 
of any relative, or person of conse- 
quence, 2 Sam. iii, 31, and on occasion 


CHAP. ΧΥ.ὕ 


ISATAH. 


145 


On his house-tops and in his broad places they all howl; 
They come down again weeping. 
4 And Heshbon crieth out, and Elealeh ; 
As far as Jahaz their voice is heard ; 
Wherefore the warriors of Moab shriek ; 
His soul trembleth within him. 


of public calamities, Esth. iv. 1. So 
great was to be the mourning in Moab, 
that it would be everywhere visible— 
on the flat roofs of the houses, and in 
the broad streets and open places of 
the cities, where the inhabitants would 
be collected, mutually to bewail the 
disastrous events.—There is in this 
verse, as in verses 5 and 8,a change of 
gender in the suffixes, which cannot 
well be ‘expressed in a translation, 
except by making them neuters, or 
occasionally omitting them, when they 
are not essential to the sense. The }, 
however, in Ynz17, clearly connects the 
word with 289; while the 7 may have 
a reference to the land, or to each 
particular city,— TY or y8 being un- 
derstood. “The idiom of our language 
being opposed to such changes of gen- 
der, it would be proper uniformly to 
employ the feminine, as we do when 
speaking of Britain, France, &c.; only, 
in such cases as the present, in which 
the names of countries are those of 
male ancestors, it would be obviously 
improper to adopt it.—222 τ, Le 
Clerc, Gesenius, and Hitzig, render, 
flowing down in tears ; but as it is only 
of the eye that the Hebrews say, 772 
my, ἐξ lets down tears, Jer. ix. 17, xiii. 
17, xiv. 17, it is better to regard the 
words as placed in opposition to 227722, 
at the beginning of ver. 2. The in- 
habitants found no relief from their 
idols: no favourable oracle alleviated 
their distress, 

4, jaw, Heshbon, the ancient resi- 
dence of the Amoritish kings, Numb. 
xxi, 26. It was given successively to 
the Reubenites, the Gadites, and the 
Levites, but was taken by the Moab- 
ites after the removal of the ten tribes. 


Its remains, now called ones ass 
ban, cover the side of a considerable 


insulated hill, at the distance of seven 
or eight miles to the north of Medeba. 


Close by, there is an uncommonly fine 
tank,—doubtless one of the pools of 
Heshbon, Song vii. 4.—720?x, Hiealeh, 
a town which also lay upon a hill, at 
the distance of a few miles from Hesh- 


bon, now called by the Arabs, (sl, 


Ll-Aal—¥%, Yahatz, Jahaz, also 737, 
Vahtza, UXX. Ἰασσά, Euseb. Ἴεσσά, 
appears to have lain on the confines 
of the desert, to the east of the two 
cities just described, and north of 
Bezer. See Deut. ii. 32; Josh. xxi. 
36; 1 Chron. vi. 78 (Heb. 63). The form 
yr τὸ marks it as being at the extre- 
mity of the country.—ax%9 '29T; in Jer. 
xlviii. 41, ΔΝ)» 133, the heroes, or warriors 


of Moab. Ym, Arab. vals, bonus et 


exquisitus fuit, bene se habet; to be ex- 
pert, ready, active: here the Pahul part. 
ready for war, prepared, armed; soldiers 
girded with the military belt, and 
otherwise fully accoutred. The LXX. 
have ὀσφύς, by which Lowth appears 
to have been misled to translate, the 
very loins of Moab; but elsewhere they 
render the word by ἐνωπλισμένος, 
ὁπλίτης, πολεμιστής, μάχιμος, ἕο. See 


Gesen., Thesaur. p. 482. Ἰμδω occurs 


in Barhebreeus, in the same accepta- 
tion. Some derive the meaning from 
yu, in the acceptation of putting off 
garments, &c.; and suppose that sol- 
diers were so called, because they laid 
aside everything that would impede 
their activity in battle. The warriors 
of Moab retain the name, though no 
longer prepared for action—There is 
a paronomasia in WY and mY, The 
former is the Hiph. fut. of »m=vy, 
to shout, make aloud noise; here, to utter 
ashrick of despair : the latter agrees with 


the Arab. ξ rp ey» to tremble, to be 


in great agitation from fear. It occurs 
only here in this acceptation; but is 


140 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XV. 


5 My heart crieth out for Moab; 
Her fugitives wander to Zoar—to Eglath-Shelishiyah— 
Yea, they go up the ascent of Luhith, weeping ; 
In the way to Horonaim, they raise the cry of destruction. 


elsewhere frequently used in the future, 
signifying to be evil, sorrowful, vexed, 
&e. 

5. Before proceeding with his de- 
scription of the universal lamentation, 
Isaiah gives expression to his com- 
passionate feelings on the occasion. 
Comp. chap. xvi. 11, xxi. 3, 4, xxii. 4; 
Jer. xxiii. 9. Lowth renders, Zhe heart 
of Moab crieth within her; but for the 
readings, 22 or 122, there is no MSS. 
authority; and 777 is equally desti- 
tute of the same support.—? 7¥3 would 
most naturally be construed to mean, 
cry out ¢o a person for help, as 1 
Chron. v. 20; but > is frequently used 
in the sense of, with regard to, on ac- 
count of, and must be so taken here.— 
For 773, which is defective, upwards 
of sixty MSS., the Soncin. Bible and 
Prophets, the Brix. and Complut. 
texts, and that of the Basil Polyglott 
of Isaiah, read in full, 773. As 
ma signifies ὦ Jar, some render it thus 
in the present instance, and explain it 
of the princes, or protectors of Moab ; 
but fugitives is a more appropriate 
acceptation in this place—w¥®, Zoar; 
Joseph. and Ptol. Ζωάρα, LXX. Σηγώρ, 
under which name it is mentioned in 
the time of the Crusades, was situated 
near the southern extremity of the 
Dead Sea, in the mouth of Wady 
Kerak, and beyond the frontier of 
Moab, in that direction. Its ruins 
are described by Irby and Mangles, 
Travels, p. 447. It was one of the 
five cities destined to be destroyed by 
fire and brimstone, Gen. xix. 22, 90, 
Comp. chap. xiv. 2.—mPptn2, or, as 
two of Kennicott’s Codices, and one 
of De Rossi’s read, 8? Ty, has much 
perplexed interpreters. It occurs only 
here, and in the parallel passage, Jer. 
xlviii. 834, where the LXX. appear to 
have retained it as a proper name: 
᾿Αγγελίαν Sadacia. Here they render 
it, Δάμαλις yap ἐστι τριετῆς, Mor she ts 
a heifer of three years old, and in some 
such rendering, the Targ., Syr., and 
Vulg., and most modern versions, con- 


cur. Those expositors who adopt this 
translation supply the verb ¢o Jow or 
bellow, and refer it either to the fugi- 
tives, or to the prophet. Hitzig refers 
it to Zoar, with which he considers it 
to be in apposition ; and is of opinion 
that it received this name on account 
of its diminutive size. He accordingly 
translates, the cow of the third rank! 
The natural position of the words cer- 
tainly requires us to regard them as 
forming a proper name—Lglath Sheli- 
shiyah, or Eglah the third ; but, in all 
probability, so called to distinguish it 
from two other places named Lylah. 
Gesenius compares Νέκλα of Etol, 


”Ayanka of Joseph., and ὠὐξὸ . Πλείμη, 


of Abulfeda. His objection to the 
last being situated beyond the nor- 
thern limit of Moab has no weight, 
since it might have been the design of 
the prophet to describe the Moabites 
as fleeing both in a southerly and a 
northerly direction. Indeed, the fords 
of Arnon, and the waters of Nimrim, 
which lay still further north, are spe- 
cifically mentioned, ver. 6, and xvi. 2. 
—Before mo nov, repeat 1, as ver. 
8, or supply 1, in which case, 7Y will 
be understood.—nm™, Lwhith, lying, 
according to Eusebius and Jerome, 
between Areopolis and Zoar, where 
the region is mountainous, the phrase 
mma my, the ascent of Luhith, is quite 
appropriate. The article in m7 be- 
longs properly to 72, which required 
it, as a nominative absolute, to render 
it more definite, see Ewald’s Gram. 
§ 511.—Of oxnh, Horonaim, we know 
nothing ; but, from its signifying 
two caverns, it probably lay in the 
same region with Luhith, which 
abounds in caverns.—The anomalous 
form vs is the fut. in Piel of the 
root \Y, to wake up, raise, instead of 
myw,—the harsh consonant 1 being 
resolved or softened into a vowel, see 
Ewald’s Gram. § 237. Such suppres- 
sion of a repeated consonant is very 
common in Aramaic. Gesenius thinks 


CHAP, ΧΥ͂.] 


ISATAH. 


147 


6 Because the water of Nimrim is wasted ; 
Because the grass is withered, the herbage is consumed. 


The tender plant is no more, 


7 Wherefore the remainder of what they have acquired, and their 


store, 


Are carried beyond the brook of the willows. 
8 For the-shout goeth round the borders of Moab ; 


To Eglaim his wailing: 


the original reading, 7%, may first 
have been changed by mistake into 
myi~’, whence the defective m2. Hahn 
has received 72 into the text.—The 
second 5 is pleonastic, and is omitted 
by Jeremiah. 

6. O22 "2, the waters of Nimrim, in 
all probability the Nahr Nimrin, or 
Wady Shoaib, which flows into the Jor- 
dan, between the brooks Jazer and 
Jabbok. Near its source was the city 
called Nimrah, Numb. xxxii. 3, and 
Beth-nimrah, ver. 36 ; the Βεθναβρὶς of 
Eusebius. Gesenius comparesthe Arab. 
pes shes clear, healthy, flowing water, 
and justly concludes, that the luxuri- 
ance of the meadows in the vicinity 
was owing to its fertilizing influence. 
On its desiccation by the enemy, comp. 
2 Kings ii. 25, sterility must neces- 
sarily have ensued.—nv20n, desolations, 
in the abstract : nowhere else applied 
to water; but as the verb ΘΟ signifies 
to waste away or perish, a8 the conse- 
quence of making desolate, the terms 
here used with effect. The conjunc- 
tion 3 repeated, introduces the causes 
of the flight described in the preced- 
ing verse. The naked accumulation 
and brevity of the concluding triplet 
is exquisite, 

7. Before tvy, supply Wx.—D WA oT 
has been variously rendered. The 
LXX., Syr., Saad., Doéder., the brook 
of the Arabs; the Vulg., with most 
modern versions, and approved by 
Gesenius and Winer, the brook of the 
willows ; Hitzig, the brook of the plains: 
but the word is never thus applied, 
except in the feminine. Some of the 
Rabbins, Le Clerc, Lowth, and Dathe, 
comparing Ps. cxxxvil. 2, suppose 
Babylon to be meant, and make the 
enemies of Moab the nominative to 


DX”, which seems forced. The river 
or brook intended, is most probably 


that of Zered, called [ως] ols, 


Wady el-Ahsa, by Burckhardt, which 
he describes as dividing the district 
of Kerek from that of Djebal, and 
flowing into the Dead Sea near Zoar, 
at the commencement of the wide 
valley called H/-Ghor. As it formed 
the proper boundary between Moab 
and Edom, it lay in the way of the 
inhabitants who fled southward, in 
order to take refuge in that country 
or in Judah. Whatever they could 
rescue, both of their flocks and herds, 
and of other moveable property, they 
conveyed across that river, beyond 
which they might hope the Babylo- 
nians would not proceed. , for 
which two MSS. and Vulg. read 79, 
has here the signification of beyond, 
with respect to place. In oN, the 
Mem is the original intensive form of 
the third person plural; but as it was 
also used as the suffix, it came to be 
changed into Vwz, and then commonly 
rejected. 

8. A reason is here assigned for the 
removal: the cry of distress was not 
confined to one part of the country, 
but went round the entire boundary. 
-ὐὐϑν, Eylaim, and Ὁ ΩΣ, Beer-elim, 
appear to have been situated the one 
to the south, and the other to the 
north, of the Moabitish territory. 
The former is doubtless the same as 
DY pr, Ln-eglaim, Ezek. xlvii. 10, which 
must have lain at the southern termi- 
nation of the Dead Sea, since Engeddi 
lay pretty far north on its western 
margin. The change of 8 and ¥ is too 
frequent to create any difficulty. Beer- 
elim has, with some shew of reason, 
been referred to 3, Beer, mentioned 


148 ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XVI’ 


And to Beer-Elim his lamentation. 

9 ‘Though the waters of Dimon are full of blood, 
Yet will I bring additional evils upon Dimon ; 
Upon the escaped of Moab I will send a lion, 
Even upon those who are left in the land. 


CHAPTER XVI. 


1 Send ye the lambs of the Ruler of the land, 


Numb. xxi. 16, as one of the Hebrew 
stations to the north-east of Moab. 
Before OX w3, subaud. τὸ, as in ver. 
5.—It is doubted whether the 7 in 
ny” be the pron. suffix. The Mappik 
is wanting in fourteen of De Rossi’s 
MSS., in the Soncin. Edit. of 1488, and 
two other printed editions. Aurivillius 
thinks the form is that of the inten- 
sive paragogic, as ny, Ps. 111. 3; 
my, cxxv. 3; but it seems preferable 
to adopt the construction of the 
ancient versions, and refer it, as a 
suffix, to the land of Moab.—The 
repetition of 72” has a very different 
effect in Hebrew from that of the 
same word repeated in English; on 
which account I have employed a 
synonyme in the second instance. 

9. Jehovah declares that fresh cala- 
mities awaited those who had made 
their escape. It is generally agreed, 
that by ji", Dimon, the same place is 
meant which is called ji24, Didon, ver. 
2; but it would be unwarrantable, 
with Déderlein, to alter the text, as 
the present reading is supported by 
all the collated MSS. except two, and 
by the ancient Greek versions. Je- 
rome mentions that the name was 
pronounced both ways in his time; 
and the frequent change of the B and 
M by the Arabs, in pronunciation, 
renders more than doubtful the con- 
jecture of Vitringa, that the word 
was purposely written fio in this 
place, in order to form a paronomasia 
with 01 following. I should rather 
imagine it was produced by the occur- 
rence of Ὃ immediately before.—n1ppi3, 
Vulg. additamenta, i.e. evils, calamities, 
as the connexion sufficiently shews.— 
Supply mtx before 72 %2).—Z ion, or 
collectively lions, is to be taken figu- 
ratively of powerful and destructive 
warriors. Déderlein is of opinion that 


Alexander the Great is meant. The 
renderings of 78 and 7978, by ᾿Αριὴλ 
and “Adaya, which we find in the 
LXX., and which Lowth adopts, can- 
not be defended. The position and 
connexion of the words evince that 
they cannot, with propriety, be thus 
construed. 

Cuap. xvi. 1. Anticipating an appli- 
cation to the Hebrews on the part of 
Moab, the prophet, to bring the inha- 
bitants of the latter country to a 
sense of their failure in fulfilling their 


former engagements, calls upon them 


to pay the tribute which was due. 
From 2 Kings iii. 4, 5, it appears 
that, till the death of Ahab, the king 
of Moab rendered to the king of 
Israel an annual tribute of a hundred 
thousand lambs, and a hundred thou- 
sand rams, with the wool. It is, in 
all probability, to some such tribute, 
which had been withheld, that refer- 
ence is here made: 23, damb, being 
used collectively for lambs. Comp. 2 
Chron. xvii. 11, where we read of the 
Arabians sending large flocks to Jeho- 
shaphat; and 2 Sam. viii. 2. On the 
slender authority of the Syrian version, 
and a couple of MSS., Lowth reads 73, 
son; and changing the tense of the 
verb, on that of the LXX. and Syr., 
renders, [ will send forth the son of the 
ruler of the land. He is followed by 
Michaelis, Déderlein, Hensler, and, in 
part, by Dathe; but still, though 73 
has since been found in two or three 
additional MSS., it is not entitled to 
adoption. “The lambs of” means, 
the lambs dwe fo the ruler of the land, 
i.e. of Judah. They were originally 
sent to the king of Israel; but Isaiah 
knew of only one legitimate king of 
the Hebrews, whose residence was, as 
here expressed, on Mount Zion. 

By v0, Sela, “the Rock,’ LXX. 


CHAP, XVI.] 


From Sela into the desert, 


ISATAH. 


149 


To the mountain of the daughter of Zion. 
2 For as a fugitive bird, banished from its nest, 
So shall the daughters of Moab be at the fords of Arnon, 


[saying,] 


Πέτρα, it is now generally agreed, is 
meant the city of Petra, afterwards so 
celebrated, anciently the metropolis 
of Arabia Petrza, but in the posses- 
sion of Moab at the time referred to 
by Isaiah. Its magnificent ruins have 
recently been discovered by Burck- 
hardt, by whom, and by Legh, Irby, 
and Mangles, it has been described, 
but still more minutely by Laborde 
and Linant, whose work contains 
splendid engravings of the ruins. 
Dr. Robinson has also given a very 
minute and interesting account of it 
in his Biblical Researches, vol. 11. pp. 
518—534. It is situated in the Wady 
Mousa—a valley with a stream, in the 
mountainous district called Djebal 
Shera, (Seir,) two long days’ journey 
north-east of Akaba, and nearly the 
same distance from the southern 
extremity of the Dead Sea. Here, in 
an area enclosed by red sandstone 
rocks, are found mausoleums, temples, 
statues, colonnades, obelisks, a trium- 
phal arch, an amphitheatre, &c., all of 
the most gigantic and imposing dimen- 
sions. The rocks on all sides are full 
of excavated sepulchres; and on every 
hand are marks of ancient magnifi- 
cence. To no place could the name of 
Sela, or Petra, with greater propriety 
have been applied: the foundations 
and ruins of the houses are found on 
both sides of the brook which flows 
through the Wady, covering an area 
of nearly two miles in circumference. 
According to Burckhardt, every thing 
indicates that a large city once existed 
here. ‘Travels, p. 437. Besides the 
present passage, it occurs. 2 Kings 
xiv. 7, and, not improbably, Isa. xlii. 
11. It is mentioned, or partly de- 
scribed, by Diodorus Siculus, xix. 95; 
Strabo, xvi. 4, 21; Pliny, vi. 28 or 32, 
and freq. by Josephus. It also occurs 
in the Acts of Councils as the see of 
a bishop, but appears to have been 
in ruins before the time of the Cru- 
sades; since which period it remained 


totally unnoticed till discovered by 
Burckhardt, on his route from Damas- 
cus to Egypt, in 1812. 

The 7 in 7379 being local, has by 
some been thought to present a diffi- 
culty, in regard to the application of 
the passage to the country between 
Petra and Jerusalem; but Strabo 
expressly states, that, beyond the 
mountainous enclosure in which the 
former city is situated, the whole region 
ts a desert, and particularly that towards 
Judea; ἔρημος ἡ πλείστη, καὶ μάλιστα 
ἡ πρὸς ᾿Ιουδαίᾳ. Ut sup. Into and 
through this desert it was necessary 
to send the flocks before they could 
reach Jerusalem. Comp. 2 Kings 
111. 8. 

2. Before j2 supply 2; thus connect- 
ing the word with 1 ἢν, and not 
taking M2 jp by itself, which does 
not yield so good a sense; and the 
adverb 13 must be understood before 
mm. It was most likely omitted on 
account of its agreement in sound 
with ἢ, which occurs immediately 
before.—axi9 ΓΞ means the Moabitish 
females, and not the towns or villages 
of Moab, as some interpret. In a 
geographical description of a country, 
and in connexion with the names of 
towns, 123, daughters, denote the sub- 
urban villages, or smaller towns de- 
pendent upon them; but never in 
connexion with the names of nations. 
See Judg. xi. 40; Gen. xxviii. 8; 2 
Sam.i.20. To render the case more 
affecting, the women are represented 
as having fled to the rightful boundary 
of the country, and applying to the 
Jews for protection.—pns? nN2y2, Mi- 
chaelis improperly renders, auf’ Leiden 
Sviten des Arnons, as if the Moabitish 
females had taken their station on 
both sides of the river. The formative 
conveys here, as usual, the idea of 
the locality in which the action ex- 
pressed by the verb takes place, from 
which the substantive is derived; i.e. 
the passages, or fording places; and ths 


π' 


150 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XVI. 


3 Furnish counsel ; give decision ; 
Yield thy shade, like that of night at mid-day ; 


Conceal the outcasts ; 
Betray not the fugitives. 


connexion shews, that only the south- 
ern bank of the Arnon is meant. 
This river takes its rise in the moun- 
tains of Arabia Deserta, and flows in 
a westerly direction into the Dead 
Sea. Its banksare described by Seetzen 
and Burckhardt as consisting of preci- 
pitous and barren rocks, which give it 
a most romantic appearance. It formed 
the northern boundary of Moab; and 
at present, under the name of Wady 
Mujeb, τὸ divides the province of Belka 
from that of Karrak. The 5 in 
yw? marks the dative of possession, 
and is to be resolved by supplying x 
before it. Comp. 1 Sam. xiv. 16; Job 
xil. 6, 8—At the close of the verse, 
ax?, saying, is omitted. See on chap. 
111. 6. 

3. This and the two following verses 
are usually considered to bea hortatory 
address to the Moabites, in reference 
to their conduct towards those Jews 
who might take refuge with them 
during intervening periods of calamity. 
Such exegesis is gone into at large by 
Vitringa. It was also formerly adopted 
by Rosenmiiller, but he has abandoned 
it in the last edition of his Commen- 
tary for that first suggested by Theo- 
doret, which is advocated by Lowth, 
Michaelis, Déderlein, Dathe, Gesenius, 
and Hitzig; viz. that the passage con- 
tains an application, on the part of 
the Moabites, to the Jews for shelter 
and protection. This interpretation 
alone gives consistency to the passage. 
The principal objection to it is drawn 
from the term ‘7, ver. 4, which, 
according to the punctuation and 
accent, must be rendered, “ My out- 
casts,’—a phrase which can only 
properly apply to the Jews. Agree- 
ably, however, to the construction 
found in the LXX., Targ., and Syr., 
the word is to be connected with the 
following, thus, 28'9 ‘173, ‘he outcasts 
of Moab. Gesenius, who, with the 
other authorities just mentioned, 
adopts this construction, compares a 
similar instance of erroneous division 


by the punctators, Gen. xlix. 26, where 
we read τὸ 7, instead of 17 for WY ὙΠ. 


Coverdale has, the persecuted Moabites. 

The phrase 722 3837, furnish or bring 
counsel, implies that the Moabites 
could no longer contrive any means of 
escape, on which account, in their 
last extremity, they apply to the Jews 
for advice. Comp. 2 Sam. xvi. 20.— 
m5 is a ἅπαξ rey. Hitzig, in accord- 
ance with the primary idea of the 
root % 8, fo divide, renders, evercise 
intervention, and explains the phrase 
of the interposition of the Jews 
between the Moabites and their ene- 
mies; but though this interpretation 
may seem at first view to be borne 
out by the connexion, it is totally 
inadmissible, on the ground of the 
intimate relation in which 7% Wy 
stands to 7zy wit, of the leading 
idea conveyed by which, it is only a 
more emphatic mode of expression. 
The term is properly judicial; and as 
the decisions of a judge are commonly 
the result of wisdom and discernment, 
and so to be depended on, the Moabit- 
ish fugitives wished to have a decision 
on which they might rely, advice 
which they might safely follow.—— 
myo md, Though $3 is placed before 
bz, it is to be construed with what 
follows. The protection yielded by 
the Jews to the suppliants would be 
as the coolness of night, if it could be 
enjoyed during the intensity of meri- 
dian heat. War and persecution are, 
in Scripture, frequently compared to 
fire or heat. No emphasis is to be 
sought for in 7\n3; it is merely in this 
and similar cases a synonyme for 3.— 
Instead of 3727 and Wy, the Keri 
reads, ἜΣ and ‘wy in the fem. singular, 
which is the gender and number of 
the other verbs in the verse. Though 
at first view they might seem to be a 
correction of some editor or copyist, 
for the purpose of producing uni- 
formity ; yet, as they are respectably 
supported, there is reason to believe 


CHAP. XVI.] 


ISAIAH. 


151 


4 Let the outcasts of Moab dwell with thee ; 
Be to them a shelter from the destroyer : 


For the oppressors shall fail, 


And the destruction shall be finished, 
And those who trod us down consumed from the land. 
5 Thus shall the throne be established in mercy, 
And there shall sit thereon in truth, in the tabernacle of David, 
A Judge, who will attend to justice, 


And be prompt in equity. 


6 We have heard of the haughtiness of Moab—he is very 


haughty— 


His haughtiness and his pride and his insolence : 


False are his pretensions. 


they exhibit the original reading. 
27, found in nine MSS., and originally 
in two more, and the reading of the 
Complut. Bible, has the suftrages of 
the LXX., Targ., Syr., Vulg., and Arab. ; 
‘vy is the reading of fifty-five MSS., 
and originally of one more; the an- 
cient, and a number of subsequent 
editions, and is borne out by the 
LXX., Syr., Targ., and Vulg. The 
sense is the same according to both 
readings. 

4, For 189 ὙΠῚ), see on the pre- 
ceding verse.—The rest of the verse 
anticipates the destruction of the 
Babylonian invader, and the return of 
the Moabites to their own land, here 
called yIN7. Υ is the part. of jy", Zo 
press, oppress. Comp. Ὁ, Prov. xxx. 
33.—DD is a particip. noun collective, 
and so agreeing with 79m in the plural. 

5. The ) at the beginning of the 
sentence is inferential, and introduces 
the apodosis to the appeal made in 
the two preceding verses. “ Render 
us the protection we solicit, and your 
doing so will, iz consequence, tarn to 
your own benefit; the exercise of 
kindness will secure the prosperity 
and perpetuity of the Davidic throne, 
and the happiness of all the subjects 
of the Jewish state.” The fugitives 
urge this consequence as an induce- 
ment to the Jews to afford them 
shelter.—1 57k is the same as ΤῊ 20, 
Amos ix, 11, and 1 ™3, Isa. vii. 2, 13. 
—That 707, éinduess, is used of human 
clemency, as well as of the Divine, 


requires no proof. Comp. 2 Sam. x. 
2; Hos. vi. 6; Micah vi. 8.’ The retri- 
butive influence of its exercise upon 
the throne is taught by Solomon, 
Prov. xx. 28. Though 707 and nox 
frequently occur in connexion with 
each other, and both terms are em- 
ployed in the present verse, and the 
one may have been suggested by the 
other, yet they are too far apart to 
admit of the usual construction. ΤῸΝ, 
truth, is to be construed along with 
avy, and is expressive of perpetuity. 
Comp. D728) and 7283, Deut. xxviii. 


59.—017, in such connexion, signifies 
to be assiduous in application, to be occu- 
pied with, attend to, any thing—?Ts V2 
is to be quick or ready in matters of 
equity, prompt in giving a righteous 
decision. 

6, This verse contains the grounds 
of the refusal which the Moabites 
should meet with from the Jews: the 
proud rebellious spirit which the 
nation of Moab had cherished, and 
the hollowness of its pretensions, 
with respect to its future relation to 
the Jewish state,—Four different 
forms of the same word are here 
employed, the more emphatically to 
express the overbearing pride of the 
Moabites. With the use of the 
adopted French word haufeur, it may 
be imitated thus: “We have heard 
of the haughtiness of Moab; (he is 
very haughty;) his high-mindedness, 
and. his hauteur, and his insolence.”— 
Ὁ is not here a particle of comparison, 


152 ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XVI. 


7 Therefore Moab may howl for Moab, 


The whole of it may howl; 


For the ruins of Kir-Hareseth ye may moan, 


Wholly afflicted. 


8 For the fields of Heshbon are withered ; 


As for the vine of Sibmah, 


but a participial adjective, signifying 
Jirm, right, true: 8, unstable, untrue, 
Jilse. O73, mere talk, pretensions, boast- 
ings, from 113, to talk idly, babble, Arab. 


AY or ad, to originate, produce some- 


thing new, and by an easy transition, 
to speak falsely, feignedly, &c. Comp. 
Job xi. 3; and for parallels, Jer. xlviii. 
29; Zeph. ii. 8—10. 

7. 122, therefore, i.e. on account of the 
refusal of the Jews to give an asylum 
to the Moabites, the latter would 
abandon themselves to renewed lamen- 
tation, nop, Air-hareseth, another 
name for Avr-Moab, chap. xv. 1, and 
written, WV, Kir-heres, ver. 11. It 
is mentioned 2 Kings iii. 25; and, 
from its being there stated, that the 
Hebrews “left the stones thereof,” 
when they subdued it, it is clear that 
wy 15 adopted into the name on 
account of the baked bricks with 
which the wall was built. The word 
otherwise signifies an earthen vessel, 
or fragments of the same.— Dx, 
Joundations, is changed, Jer. xlviii. 31, 
into "28, men, which Lowth, Dathe, 
and Boothroyd, adopt. The LXX., 
too, have τοῖς κατοικοῦσι; but it is 
evident that the difference of reading 
is to be traced to the derivation of 
ower, from wx, and its being consi- 
dered as a reduplicate form of Dx, 
for which was substituted the more 
common form ox. As, however, 
there is no various reading in the 
text of Isaiah, the laws of criticism 
require that we endeavour to ascertain 
the meaning of the word; and, if it 
can be ascertained, to translate and 
interpret it accordingly. Now it so 
happens, that the Syriac version, in 
preserving, in a great measure, the 
form of the original term, has likewise 


preserved its signification. Δα] 
9 


to which corresponds the Chald. inwR, 


Ezra iv. 12, v. 16, and the Heb. nite, 
Jer. 1. 15, signifies foundations, and 
thus harmonizes with the Arab. 


Ll, Lele, Jundamentum  struc- 
ture, &e. Gol. κἱ, in the 2d conj. 


signifies, fo make firm, found, ἕο. 'To 
this interpretation Rosenmiller re- 
turns in his last edition, and it is 
adopted by Winer, Gesenius, and Hit- 
zig. The meaning of the prophet, 
therefore, is, that the Moabites would 
specially mourn on account of the 
destruction of their principal fortress, 
—nothing being left but the fownda- 
tions, or 7uins.—O'ND) FX is to be referred, 
not to Dwwx, immediately preceding, 
—the verb 823=12), to smite, beat down, 
being inapplicable to foundations,— 
but to the Moabites, the nominative 
to the verb 77. The particle x, 
before adjectives, signifies, only, wholly, 
entirely, as Deut. xvi. 15. 

8. 3 introduces a statement which 
contains additional reasons for the 
lamentation.—— ox — ΠΟΘ, a fem. 
plural construed with a mascul. sing. 
verb; forming one of those instances 
in which, as Ewald expresses it, the 
sense predominates over the external 
grammatical form. Comp. Hab. iii. 
17. 78 occurs only in the plural, 
and but seldom. It is not found in 
any of the cognate dialects; but the 
connexions in which it is used suffi- 
ciently vouch for the meaning of fields, 
occupied either with grain or vines. 
That the latter are here intended, is 
clear from what follows.—722¥, S7d- 
mah, according to Jerome, was only 
half a Roman mile distant from Hesh- 
bon, and is mentioned on account of 
the superior excellence of its grapes. 
Seetzen found the vine still cultivated 
in those parts.—As the verb 027 is 
unquestionably used metaphorically 
in reference to intoxication, chap. 


CHAP. XVI.] 


ISATAH. 


153 


The lords of the nations have broken down its noble branches ; 
They reached unto Jazer; they strayed into the desert ; 
Its tendrils spread themselves out, 


They passed over to the sea. 


9 Therefore I will weep with the weeping of Jazer for the vine of 


Sibmah ; 


I will make thee wet with my tears, O Heshbon and Elealeh ; 
For upon thy summer and thy harvest falleth the battle-shout. 
10 Joy and exultation are taken away from the fruitful field ; 


xm. os) Prov, xxii ao; Lowth, 
Jenour, and others, suppose it to be 
employed in the same acceptation 
here, and render, “ overpowered,” or 
“made drunk, the lords of the nations ;” 
but such a construction cannot be 
justified from the context, which re- 
quires something to be expressed in 
this clause, to correspond to the 
withering of the fields in the preceding. 
The word properly signifies, to deat or 
strike with a hammer; hence ΠΡΌΣ, a 
hammer; and well expresses in this 
place the havoc made by the Babylo- 
nians, who were at the time, D2 °2P3, 
the holders of all but universal empire. 
—The rest of the verse describes in 
highly poetic language the luxuriant 
growth of the vines. In order to their 
propagation, they needed no props, 
but stretched spontaneously in the 
direction of Jazer and the Arabian 
desert, towards the east, and in that 
of the Dead Sea, towards the west. 
um, Jazer, is placed by Eusebius ten 
Roman miles westward of Philadelphia, 
the ancient capital of the Ammonites, 
and fifteen from Heshbon. Its re- 
mains are supposed to be those men- 
tioned by Seetzen, under the name of 


hes Ssir. The 0, sea, spoken of, is 


by some interpreted of a lake or sea in 
the vicinity of Jazer; but as there is 
no appearance of any in that region, it 
seems preferable to refer it to the 
Dead Sea, the only water which, in 
such connexion, deserves the name. 
It is true, the reading in Jer. xlviii. 
32 is, WOW Ὁ HI, they pass over the 
sea; to the sea Jazer, &c.; but there is 
reason to believe the second = is an 
interpolation. It is omitted in two of 
Kennicott’s MSS., and was not read by 


the LXX.—The phrase 129 does 
not mean that the vines actually shot 
across the sea; that scions were con- 
veyed thither for plantation; or that 
the wine was transported thither for 
use: but simply indicates that they 
passed on fo it .as their limit. That 
av may signify, fo pass over an interven- 
ing space, before reaching what is 
pointed out by the following accusa- 
tive, is clear, from chap. xxxi. 9; Jer. 
ii. 10; Amos vi. 2; and that such 
must be the meaning here, is equally 
clear, from the use of the adverb ἽΡ in 
the preceding line. The LXX., under- 
standing the word in this sense, ren- 
der: διέβησαν yap πρὸς τὴν θάλασσαν. 

9. The weeping of Jazer, means the 
great distress of the inhabitants of 
that city, on account of the destruc- 
tion of the vines by which they were 
plentifully supplied with grapes and 
wine. It is not unlikely that their 
means of subsistence were chiefly 
derived from this source.— "8 is the 
Piel of ™, to drink, satiate; by trans- 
position, for ΣΝ, fo saturate with 
moisture.—1T0 is used in two different 
senses in this and the following verse. 
Here it signifies the victorious shout of 
the enemy; but in ver. 10, the joyful 
shout or acclamation of the vintagers 
treading the grapes. The former had 
taken the place of the latter. Rosen- 


miller compares the Arab. Xs, which _ 
is chiefly used of the noise made by 
the sea upon the shore; hence ἕω, 
thunder. Lowth’s emendation of V3? 
and 7 into v2 and 77% cannot be 
sustained. 

10. "92, see chap. x. 18. YY, not 
from Yy3, but the Palel of 24, which in 


Ξ- τὸ 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XVI. 


And in the vineyard is no joyful cry, no shouting ; 
The treader treadeth not the wine in the vats; 
The vintage-shout I have made to ¢ease. 


11 


Therefore my bowels shall sound like a harp for Moab ; 


My inward parts for Kir-Hares. 

12 And it shall come to pass that though Moab present himself, 
Though he weary himself upon the high place, 
And enter into his sanctuary to pray, 


Yet he shall not prevail. 
13 
14 


This is the word which Jehovah spake concerning Moab of 
.old; but now Jehovah speaketh, saying, 


Within three years, as the years of a hireling, 
The nobility of Moab shall be diminished, 
With the whole of the great multitude ; 


Hiphil, Palel, and Hithpalel, is em- 
ployed in the sense of shouting, making 
a loud or joyful noise. On 3x, see chap. 
v.2. In Wilkinson’s Ancient Egyp- 
tians, vol. 11. p. 152, and Rosellini’s 
Monuments of Egypt, are representa- 
tions of persons treading out the 
grapes. Some six or seven, holding by 
as many ropes suspended from a com- 
mon hook in the ceiling, stamp in the 
press or upper trough, and thus press 
out the juice, which flows into the 
troughs below. 

11. Comp. Jer. iv. 19, xxxi. 20. In 
Hebrew, Oy? is often used in cases in 
which we should say, breast, bosom, 
&e.; but it is quite the language of 
nature. 

12. Gesenius observes a parono- 
masia in 793, and m872,—the simple 
variation in sound being produced by 
the different liquids Ἢ and >. In the 
combination, however, of the two 
terms, there is nothing of that draw- 
ling with which he charges the con- 
struction; for, as he himself shews, 
the former is the appropriate word by 
which to express the appearance of 
men before their God for the purpose 
of worship, &c.; and the latter ex- 
presses the fruitless fatigue and trouble 
to which idolaters submit in worship- 
ping a deity from which no aid can be 
obtained. Comp. 1 Kings xviii. 26, 
ὅθ. For the same reason, we must 
reject Secker’s conjecture, that 72% 
is an interpolation. 


13, 14. That these verses refer to 
two distinct prophecies cannot be 
disputed. The only difficulty respects 
the time of their delivery. Hither the 
words are those of Isaiah, in which 
case he specifies two different periods 
at which he received oracular an- 
nouncements to deliver against Moab, 
or, as Hitzig supposes, a prophecy 
delivered by some more ancient pro- 
phet, which Isaiah quotes, and then 
adds the definite specification of time 
with respect to its fulfilment; or they 
are those of a later prophet, whom 
the Lord employed to repeat the 
words of Isaiah three years before the 
completion of the prophecy. That 
the latter is the more probable bypo- 
thesis, appears from the use of the 
word w», from that time, which never 
stands absolutely, as here, except to 
denote anciently, at some remote former 
time. Considering, indeed, the long 
period during which Isaiah prophe- 
sied, it is quite possible that he may 
have received the two predictions, 
with a long interval between ; but the 
expression would be more appropriate 
in the mouth of a prophet who 
flourished upwards of a hundred years 
after his death. Besides, we know of 
no invasion of Moab, or destruction 
of its cities, in the time of Isaiah; 
and the appropriation of his prophecy 
by Jeremiah to what was still future 
at the time the latter prophet wrote, 
affords convincing proof that the 


CHAP. XVII.| 


And the remnant shall be very small and powerless. 


same events are predicted by both. 
It may, therefore, be concluded, that 
the words were added, by Divine 
inspiration, through the instrument- 
ality of some prophet who lived within 
three years of the Babylonian invasion, 

—VId 120, the years of an hireling, denote 


ISAIAH. 


φ 


which the hired labourer is to perform 
his work, and beyond which it will not 
be protracted—22, which commonly 
signifies glory, is here, as contrasted 
with 7129, the multitude, to be taken in 
the sense of nobility, or honourable men. 
Comp. chap. v. 14. 


the pertain, Jjived, or definite time in 
---- 


CHAPTER XVIL 


THE SENTENCE OF DAMASCUS. 


Chapters xvii. and xviii. form another connected prophecy, but contain matter 
relating to several nations. The whole is entitled, “The Sentence of 
Damascus,” because it commences with denunciations against that power, 
1—3; but the fate of Ephraim is almost insensibly mixed up with it, on 
account of the confederacy which existed between them, 3—6. The bene- 
ficial effects of the Divine judgments upon the remaining Israelites are 
described, 7, 8; and then, 9—11, a more affecting description is given of 
these judgments, and their cause expressly stated. We have next, 12—14, 
an exhibition of the Assyrian army rushing forward against Jerusalem, and 
its sudden and miraculous destruction. To this wonderful intervention of 
Jehovah for the deliverance of his people, the attention of the nations, and 
especially of Egypt and Ethiopia, is summoned, xviii. 1—3; a highly 
wrought metaphorical description of the discomfiture of Sennacherib, with 
whom the Ethiopians were at war, is then presented, 4—6 ; and the section 
concludes with a prediction of presents which that people would, in conse- 
quence, forward to Jerusalem, in honour of the true God, 7. 

The different parts of the prophecy cohere both in point of subjects and 
chronology. The destruction of Damascus was effected by Tiglath-pileser, 
B. C. 736, who immediately thereon invaded the kingdom of Israel, and 
carried away many of the inhabitants into Media and Assyria. The punish- 
ment of the latter kingdom was still further inflicted by the Assyrian 
power, under Shalmaneser, B.c. 722; and within twenty years afterwards, 
Sennacherib undertook his celebrated expedition against Tirhakah, king of 
Ethiopia, and Hezekiah, king of Judah, when, as here predicted, his army 
was completely overthrown by the miraculous power of Jehovah, and he 
returned to Nineveh, See chap. xxxvii. 36, 37. 


1 Bexoip, Damascus shall be removed from being a city ; 


1. pw97, in the Books of Chronicles now commonly Las), Damascus, the 


poo, Syr. econo}, Arab. ened, metropolis of Western Arama, or 


156 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP, XVII. 


And shall become a heap of ruins. 
2 The cities of Aroer shall be deserted ; 


They shall be for flocks, 


Which shall lie down, and none shall alarm them. 
3 And the fortress shall cease from Ephraim, 
And the kingdom from Damascus and the rest of Syria; 


As the glory of the children of Israel shall they be, 


Saith Jehovah of Hosts. 


Syria. It was a city in the days of 
Abraham, Gen. xiv. 15, xv. 2. Its 
kings, after the time of Solomon, were 
frequently engaged in hostilities with 
the Jewish and Israelitish monarchs ; 
and at length, in the reign of Pekah, 
entered into a confederacy with that 
usurper against Judah. It suffered 
most severely during the invasion of 
Tiglath-pileser, by whom the popula- 
tion were removed beyond the river 
Kur, in the north of Media. After 
this, its fates have been various, in 
the time of the Greeks, Romans, Ara- 
bians, Saracens, Crusaders, and Turks, 
by whom it has been successively con- 
quered. It is now in the hands of the 
Egyptians, and is the capital of a 
pashalic of the same name. It is situ- 
ated on the Chrysorrhoas, now called 
Barady, in a large and beautiful plain, 
atthe foot of Antilibanus, and is one 
of the most opulent cities of hither 
Asia. The population amounts to 
upwards of 100,000.—12, before the 
participle 197%, indicates futurity ; see 
chap. vii. 14; Gen. 1. 5; 2 Sam. xx. 
21; Jer. xxvii. 16, xxxvili. 22. 
yyp= Ty nvm, from being a city, 1.6. 50 
as not to be what it had been; but on 
the contrary, Ὁ, a heap. This latter 
word, which occurs only here, is equi- 
valent to, a heap of ruins, and both are 
derived from τῆν, /o overthrow, destroy. 
The peculiar form ‘?9 is purposely 
chosen, to make it correspond to Vy», 
and so to produce a paronomasia. 

2, wv ~w the LXX. render εἰς τὸν 
αἰῶνα, as if their copy had read 1772y. 
This rendering Lowth adopts, on the 
grounds, that neither of the two cities 
called Aroer, in the tribe of Gad, and 
on the Arnon, can have anything to 
do with Damascus; and that “the 
cities of Aroer,” if Aroer is itself a 


city, makes no good sense. It is clear, 
however, from 1 Kings xxii. 3, and 2 
Kings x. 33, that the Syrians of 
Damascus smote the Israelites in the 
whole of the mountainous tract be- 
tween the Arnon and Bashan; and 
they may have been in possession of 
the principal towns at the time Isaiah 
prophesied, But it is not necessary 
to connect what is contained in this 
verse with Damascus. It rather refers 
to the removal of the Israelites who 
occupied the country beyond the Jor- 
dan by ‘Tiglath-pileser, recorded 2 
Kings xv. 29; where, it is obvious, 
Gilead is to be taken in its most ex- 
tensive sense, as comprehending all 
the territory just mentioned. This 
depopulation the prophet foretells, 
after having predicted the destruction 
of Damascus, and then proceeds, in 
the third verse, to combine the two 
confederate states in the same over- 
throw. The phrase Wi "2, the cities of 
Aroer, is just as intelligible as ji2e7 
Ww, Heshbon and all her cities, Josh. 
xiil. 17; reference being had in both 
cases to other towns in the vicinity 
connected with, or dependent upon 
them. 

3. By the fortress of Ephraim, some 
understand Damascus, on account of 
the aid which that city afforded to the 
ten tribes ; but the juxta-position in 
which it stands with the kingdom 
of Damascus, immediately following, 
shews that Samaria and other fortified 
places must be meant. Comp. Hos. 
x. 14.—The most natural division of 
the verse is that made by the Maso- 
rites, and adopted in our common 
version, by placing the Athnach under 
daw. This of course renders altogether 
nugatory the conjecture of Houbigant, 
which Lowth follows, by which πὸ is 


CHAP. XVII. | 


ISATAH. 


157 


4 And it shall come to pass in that day: 
The glory of Jacob shall be brought low ; 
And the fatness of his flesh become lean, 
5 And it shall be as when a harvest-man gathereth the standing 


corn, 


And reapeth the ears with his arm ; 
It shall even be as the gleaning of ears, 


In the valley of Rephaim. 


For gleanings shall be left in it, as in the olive-harvest ; 


Two or three berries on the top of a high tree; 


Four or five on the branches of one that is fruitful ; 
Saith Jehovah, the God of Israel. 


to be changed into nxv. “The glory 
of the children of Israel” means, not 
their glory in the plenitude of its pos- 
session, but in its diminished and, 
reduced state, as described in the 
following verse. Both kingdoms were 
to share the same fate. 

4, apy, Jacob, is here used in a re- 
stricted sense, in application to the 
ten tribes. Comp. Hos. xii. 2; Micah 
i.5. For the rest of the verse, com- 
pare chap. x. 16; only, in the present 
case, the metaphor is not to be con- 
fined to the captains of the Israelitish 
army, but comprehends the rich and 
prosperous portion of the community. 

5. ὍΣ, harvest, may stand for Ux 
Y32, a harvestman, or it may be taken 
as a noun adjective with the same sig- 
nification, like ΘῈΣ, 122, ΤΌΤ, &c. Before 
yt supply 3. Comp. 3, Ps. xxiii. 2. 
The different actions of the reaper 
and gleaner are designed to convey 
the idea of total consumption. Such 
metaphorical allusions to the harvest, 
in reference to the destruction of the 
inhabitants of a country, are frequent 
in Scripture—The valley of Rephaim 
lay to the south-west of Jerusalem, 
but near it, on the confines of Judah 
and Benjamin. It was about fifteen 
stadia in extent, and of great fertility. 
Its name appears to have been de- 
rived from its having been originally 
occupied by a section of the ancient 
Canaanitish giants. Comp. Josh. xv. 
8; 2Sam. v. 18, 22, xxiii. 13, 

6. In order still farther to set forth 
the extent of the devastation, but yet 


to intimate, that, in the sparing mercy 
of God, some few of the inhabitants 
should be left, the prophet borrows 
an image from the olive-harvest.—i3 
refers to 27%, ver. 4.—ni%¥, gleanings, 
from Ὧν, to do any thing a second time, 


to do it thoroughly ; Arab. Je, biben- 


dum dedit secunda vice, post priorem 
haustum, 2d ΟΠ]. ; bibit iterum ite- 
rumque, ef ita carpsit fructus, Gol. For 
the enallage generis, see chap. xvi. 8. 
—™1 Fp, lit. the beating of the olive-tree, 
in allusion to the mode of reaping the 
olives, by beating the branches with a 
stick, and thus causing the berries to 
fall off. In such a process, it often 
happens that a few are left unobserved 
by the reapers. Comp. Deut. xxiv. 
20; Isa. xxvii. 12, where 027 is em- 
ployed to denote the same action.— 
on, derries generally, here olives or 


olive-bexries. Chald, 272; Arab. 5:15. 


faba, but used here by Saadias for 
olives. It seems properly to be an 
intensive form of 73, a small corn, 
bean, berry, or grain.— V8, a towering 
branch; UXX. ἐπ’ ἄκρου μετεώρου ; 
Vulg. ix summitate rami. The etymo- 
logy of the word is best illustrated by 


reference to the Arab. peel 9 Emir, duc, 


princeps, one who is at the head of 
others.—The 7 in 72x may be the 
suffix anticipative of 7, more Ara- 
maico; or the words ought to be 
divided and read thus: 57 ‘pyD, 
Before 7 is an ellipsis of Υϑ or ™. 


U 


158 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XVII. 


7 In that day shall a man have regard to his Maker, 
And his eyes shall look to the Holy One of Israel : 

8 And he shall not have regard to the altars, the work of his hands, 
Nor look to the things which his fingers have made— 


7,8. Under the pressure of calamity, 
the remnant of the people would be 
brought to a conviction of the folly of 
idolatry, and abandon its rites for 
the worship and service of the true 
6οα.--πνῷ, Ger. schauen, among other 
significations, denotes fo look to any one 
for help—The in DAT OWN is to 
be rendered distr ibutively : either—or. 
Comp. Exod. xxi. 17. These two words 
describe the principal objects of Pha- 
nician and Syrian idolatry, as artificial 
representatives of their prototypes in 
the planetary system: the one class 
of images representing Baa/, or the 
Sun ; and the other, ds/ar/e, the Moon, 
or Venus. 77x, of which νῶν is the 
mas. plur, (ΘΟ or O°"D3, émuges, being 
understood), has most commonly been 
rendered groves; and, from the fact 
that groves were anciently chosen for 
purposes of religious, and especially 
of idolatrous worship, it has generally 
been maintained by expositors that 
such are here meant. It has, how- 
ever, been shewn by various authors, 
and especially, of late, by Gesenius, 
that this signification will not suit 
many of the passages in which the 
term occurs ; and that, in others, the 
idea of a grove is next to absurd. 
There is nothing in the word itself, 
etymologically considered, or in any 
of its cognates, that would suggest 
such an idea. Nor is the acceptation 
temple or shrine, one whit better sup- 
ported. Though commonly rendered 
ἄλσος by the LXX., whence, through 
the Vulg., the signification of grove 
has crept into the modern versions, 
yet they have rendered 71x by ᾽Ασ- 
τάρτη, 2 Chron. xv.16; ᾿Αστάρται, XXIV. 
18. Aq. and Symm. “have also more 
than once translated it in the same 
way; and even the Vulg. itself has 
Astaroth for nivdx, the fem. plur. form, 
Judg. iii. 7. To the interpretation 
which would assign Asfarle as the 
meaning, it may be objected, that this 
goddess is called πῦρ, Ashtoreth, in 
Scripture, and her images, ninavy, 


Ashtaroth; but itis no unusual thing in 
mythology for gods to have more than 
one name, all of which, however, are 
significative of some peculiar quality 
or operation. With respect to njnAvy, 
it is now a settled point, that it cor- 


responds to the Persic sin, and the 
Zabian Syriac 13 δου], and signifies the 


Star, 1. e. by way of eminence, in a 
religious point of view. Mx, on the 
other hand, signifies fortune, happiness, | 
or the goddess by whom they were 
conferred. This the Phcenicians and 
Syrians considered to be Venus, or the 
female generative principle, the com- 
panion and spouse of Baal, or the sun : 
though, according to Lucian, De Dea 
Syr. 4, and Herodian, V. vi. 10, the 
Moon had this honour ascribed to her. 

The late Dr. Minter was of opinion, 
that originally the Moon was wor- 
shipped under the name of Astarte, 
but that, in process of time, it came 
to be transferred by the licentious 
Syrians to Venus. The word thus 
agrees with the Heb. Wx, Ws, Aappi- 
ness, and the verb Wx, fo go forward, 
prosper, be happy, &c. The worship of 
this goddess was destructive of female 
virtue, and otherwise consisted of 
many licentious rites. Her image had 
the form of a woman, with the head 
and horns of a bull, to which there is 
an evident allusion in the very ancient 
name, Ashteroth-Karnaim, i.e. the two- 
horned Ashteroth, Gen. xiv.5. From 
the frequent references made to this | 
worship in the Old Testament, it is 
clear that the Hebrews, especially the 
ten tribes, whose territory bordered on 
Pheenicia and Syria, were, at times, 

much addicted to 1Ὁ.-- 91, the other 
term here employed, is derived from 

oon, to be hot; hence ΠΌΤ, the solar 
heat, Ps. xix. 7, and the Szx himself, 

Job xxx. 28; Isa. xxiv. 23, xxx. 26: 
That images or statues erected for the 
worship of the Sun are meant, is 
placed beyond all doubt by Gesenius, 


CHAP. XVII. ] 


ISAIAH. 


The images of Astarte, or the pillars of the Sun. 
9 In that day his fortified cities shall be 
Like what is left of the thickets and the tall forests, 
Which were left before the children of Israel : 
Yea, each of them shall be desolate. 


in his recent work on Pheenician lite- 
rature. On a stone found in Malta, 
is the Punic inscription, j28 2am 5y2, 70 
Baal Hamén, a stone. Another reads: 
Δ ὙΠ ὮΝ MT bya ΣΥΝ) 2 2) nbn an? 
ον 32 eT mnw, To our Lady 
Tholath, and our Lord Baal Hamdan, a 
man vows to the goddess of fortune—the 
writer—Ben Ebed-milkar ; and so others 
that might be- quoted. These two 
inscriptions not only contain the word 
of our text, and that in connexion 
with Baal, but the latter has likewise 
Astaroth and Gad, both denoting For- 
tune in an idolatrous sense. See Isa. 
lxv. 11, where ἼΣ15 improperly rendered 
troop in the common translation, <Ac- 
cording to Spencer, 11. 25, the most 
ancient images of the Sun erected by 
the Egyptians, Syrians, and Pheeni- 
cians, were conical or pyramidal in 
shape, resembling arising flame. Aiéos 
δὲ Tis ἐστι μέγιστος, κάτωθεν περιφερής, 
λήγων εἰς ὀξύτητα: κωνοειδὲς αὐτῷ σχῆμα 
μέλαινά τε ἡ χροία. Herodian. V. 11]. 
10. Besides the present instance, 
ons and Dy are combined, chap. 
xxvil. 9, and in connexion with D%y3, 
2 Chron. xxxiv. 4, 7. 

9. The suffix in 1¥9, refers to Jacob, 
ver. 4. The rest of the verse involves 
no small difficulty. . The ancient trans- 
lators, as well as the moderns, have 
been perplexed by it. Aq. renders 
wasn wim, festa et Emir; Symam. sylva 
et Amir ; Theod. Ars, or Hores et Amir. 
The LXX. reversing the order of the 
words : of ᾿Αμοῤῥαῖοι καὶ of Evaiot, i. 6. 
the Amorites and the Hivites, which is 
adopted by boththe Lowths, Michaelis, 
Struensee, Koppe, Dathe, Eichhorn, 
and Boothroyd. This rendering is, 
however, decidedly and justly rejected 
by Déderlein, Gesenius, and Hitzig, as 
having no foundation in the Hebrew 
text. The Syr., Saad., and Hitzig, 
consider the words to be the names of 
places; yet as 1 clearly appears, 
from Ezek, xxxi.3; 1 Sam. xxiii. 15, 


16; 2 Chron. xxvii. 4, to signify ὦ 
dense wood, thicket, or such like ; comp. 


Chald. xtvn, Sam. YX, wood ; 


and as YX occurs, ver. 6, in the 
sense of a fall tree, it is most natural 
to assign to it the same signification 
in this place: so that, regarded as 
collective nouns, the former will de- 
note such woods as consist of low 
trees or shrubs, the intertwisting 
branches of which form thickets ; and 
the latter, forests of tall and stately 
trees, as cedars, pines, &c. There is 
at least more consistency in this in- 
terpretation than in that of Gesenius, 
who considers the latter word to sig- 
nify the summit of a mountain— 
my Ws, lit. which they left; but as 
there is no antecedent, it 1s better to 
render the verb passively, as Job vii. 
3, xxxii. 15. See Gesen. Lehrgeb. p. 
798; Luke xii. 20. At the same time, 
there seems no reason to doubt, that 
reference is had to the native Canaan- 
ites who were compelled to abandon 
their country on its occupation by 
the Hebrews ; so that 82 1212 forms a 
constructio preguans,—“which they left, 
(when they fled,) before the children 
of Israel;” or, passively, “which 
were left,” when they, i.e. the Canaan- 
ites, fled before, &c. The allusion is to 
the woods and forests, which covered 
a great part of the country, at the 
time the Israelites took possession οἵ 
it, but which had afterwards, with 
few exceptions, been cut down. So it 
should be with the fortified cities of 
Israel—mn, the fem. sing. though 
construed with Ὁ, the plur. mas., 
because the subjects spoken of are in- 
animate. Such construction of the 
plural, technically called the pluralis 
inhumanus, is predominant in Arabic. 
Other Hebrew instances occur, Ps: 
XXXviil. 31; Job xiv. 19, xxxix, 14. 
See Gesen. Lehrgeb. p. 719. 


100 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XVII. 


10 Because thou hast forgotten the God of thy salvation, 
And hast not remembered the Rock of thy strength ; 
Therefore thou mayest plant pleasant plants, 


And set a foreign shoot. 
11 


In the day when thou plantest it, thou mayest hedge it in ; 


And in the morning, what thou hast set may blossom ; 
But the harvest shall flee away, 
In the day of pain and desperate grief. 


12 


Ho! the noise of many peoples, 


They make a noise like the noise of seas ; 


The roaring of nations, 


Like the roaring of mighty waters, they roar. 


13 
roar, 


As for the nations, like the roaring of many waters they may 


But he shall rebuke them, and they shall flee far away ; 


10. In yo there is a reference to 
hyn, ver. 9. If the Israelites had 
served Jehovah, they would -have 
found in him that defence which none 
of their fortified cities could yield 
them ; but having forsaken him, they 
had nothing to expect but disappoint- 
ment and misery.—The fem. gender 
is here introduced, and continued to 
the end of the following verse, which 
closes the section. OY, of common 
gender, is understood.—vz, Rock, is 
frequently employed metaphorically as 
a Divine name. See Deut. xxxii. 4, 
15, 18, 30, 31 ; Isa. xxvi. 4; 1 Cor. x. 
4, The antithesis between the true 
God, and the “pleasant plants” and 
“foreign shoots,” clearly shews, that 
by the latter are meant the idols which 
the Israelites had imported from Phoe- 
nicia and Syria, and the sinful alliances 
and gratifications connected with their 
worship. 793, is a collective.—»n, Zo 
sow, is here, as chap. xl, 24, used for 
planting. 

11. -x070n, the Pilpel of 2%, the 
same as JR, AD, 72v, to hedge, surround 


with a hedge, Arab. rom coronatus, et re 


aliqua, tanquam corona, cinctus fuit. 
The derivation from 22% cannot be sus- 
tained.—»¥ in the sense of sapling or 
scion. Comp. on 3, ver. 10.—7 is the 
Benon. participle of 1), fo flee away, 


vanish, and strikingly expresses the 
complete disappearance of all the ad- 
vantages which the Israelites expected 
from their idolatrous connexions. In- 
stead of these, they were to reap pain 
and sorrow of the severest description. 
——im. The close connexion in which 
this word stands with tx 1x2, shews 
that it is not to be taken in the sense 
of possession, from 2, but is a parti- 
ciple noun fem. in Niph. from ΠΤ, ¢o 
be sick, in pain, &c., only the Hateph- 
Patach must be changed into Sheva. 
Thus 7m, Jer. xiv, 17, xxx. 12, and 
two of the Erfurt Codices, have the 
same punctuation in this place. In 
this way, too, the Syr. and Saad. con- 
strue the passage. Gesenius, following 
the LXX., Aq., Symm., and Vulg., ren- 
ders, day of possession. 

12,13. With the former of these 
verses commences a new subject, which 
is prosecuted to the end of chap. xviii. 
Having brought to a close what he 
had to deliver respecting the punish- 
ment of Syria and Ephraim by the 
Babylonians, the prophet makes a 
sudden transition to the invasion of 
Juda by the army of Sennacherib ; 
and while he describes in strong lan- 
guage its terrific approach, he predicts 
its sudden and complete overthrow.— 
17, ho/ an exclamation here used to 
call attention to the Assyrian army. 


CHAP. ΧΥΠῚ.] 


ISAIAH. 


161 


They shall even be chased like the chaff of the mountains before 


the wind, 


And like the whirling stubble before the hurricane. 
i4 At the time of evening, behold terror ! 

Before morning, they are no more! 

This is the portion of them that spoil us; 

And the lot of them that plunder us. 


The repetition of the same terms gives 
pathos to the passage. It is true, the 
first five words of ver. 13 are wanting 
in seven MSS., originally in another, 
and in the Syr., which has excited the 
suspicion, that as they are nearly iden- 
tical with the last member of the pre- 
ceding verse, they have been repeated 
by some inadvertent transcriber. Be 
this as it may, the text, as it stands in 
the printed editions, agrees with that 
from which the LXX. translated ; and 
the repetition is found in all the other 
versions, the Syr. alone excepted. On 
the supposition of its genuineness, 
Gesenius finds in it a climactic rhythm, 
a species of Hebrew poetry, according 
to which, a subsequent verse resumes 
and repeats the closing words of the 
preceding. The comparison of the 
tumultuous noise of an army to the 
roaring of the sea, which Isaiah had 
already employed, chap. v. 30, is fre- 
quently used in the Psalms and the 
prophets.—The reference in the suff. 
12 and the corresponding singular of 


the verbs 52 and ΤΊ, is to Sennacherib 
understood.—The “chaff of the moun- 
tains,” is the chaff carried off by a 
sudden and violent gust of wind from 
the threshing-floor, which was usually 
situated on some hill or elevated place. 
—23, from 3, fo roll, forcibly ex- 
presses the rolling accumulations of 
stubble, dust, &c. which are borne up- 
wards into the air, during a hurricane. 
No metaphor could more aptly de- 
scribe the sudden destruction of the 
hostile army. See my Biblical Re- 
searches, p. 395. 

14, A strong antithesis. Comp. Ps. 
xxx. 5. The verse concludes with a 
shout of exultation over the downfal 
of the enemy, which strikingly ex- 
presses the feelings of the inhabitants 
of Jerusalem on the morning of their 
deliverance. See chap. xxxvu.36. The 
1 before 28, which fifteen MSS. and 
two of the early editions exhibit, 
though countenanced by the LXX., 
Syr., “Targ, . and Vulg., can scarcely be 
considered genuine. 


CHAPTER XVIII. 


While considerable obscurity hangs over certain parts of this prophecy, it 
nevertheless presents several points which serve as distinct landmarks for 
the guidance of the interpreter. That it is not a separate or disjointed 
portion of the book, may be maintained on three grounds: First, it is not 
introduced as a distinct prophecy, which is the case with all the other pro- 
phetic oracles contained in chaps. xiii—xxiii. Secondly, it is not denuncia- 
tory of judgment upon the nation to which it refers, which is likewise the 
case with those oracles. And, thirdly, vers. 4—6 are so obviously parallel 
with chap. xvii. 13, 14, that they can only with propriety be viewed as 


162 ISAIAH. [CHAP. XVIII. 


referring to the same event. It must, therefore, be connected with the 
three last verses of the preceding chapter; and, according to the unstrained 
explanation of the geographical and other features which it exhibits, and 
the historical circumstances of the period, there is no country to which it 
can consistently be applied but Ethiopia. At the time Sennacherib invaded 
Judea, which was towards the close of the fourteenth year of Hezekiah’s 
reign, the king of Ethiopia was Tirhakah, a monarch of great military 
renown, (Strabo, xv. 1. 6,) whose figure, name, and the expedition which he 
undertook against Sennacherib, are recorded on the walls of a Theban 
temple. Wilkinson’s Ancient Egyptians, vol. i. p. 140. According to the 


Phonetic alphabet, his name is TH PK, or, as found on the ruins of 


Medinath-Abu, and those of the mountain Barkal, in Abyssinia, "TH PKA. 
See Rosell. Mon. ii. tab. 8. Succeeding Sabacho, and Sevechus or So, he 
also reigned over Upper Egypt; and, in all probability, had his residence at 
Thebes. As the ultimate object of Sennacherib was the conquest of Egypt, 
Tirhakah, being informed of his approach, set out with an army to attack 
him. See 2 Kings xix. 9; Isa, xxxvii. 9. While on the point of taking 
Jerusalem, the army of the king of Assyria was miraculously destroyed; 
and as this event was not only of immense importance politically, but 
calculated to draw the attention of the surrounding nations to the character 
and claims of Jehovah, it was proper that messengers should be despatched 
to the principal powers, and especially to Tirhakah, who was more than 
ordinarily interested in the fate of the Assyrian army. The despatch of 
these messengers, and the result which followed, form the subject of the 
present chapter. 


1 Ho! thou land of rustling wings, 


1. One grand source of the mis- 
interpretation of this chapter has 
been the false idea which many have 
attached to the interjection "7. In- 
stead of rendering it o/ as a call, 
summoning attention, which the con- 
text requires, most translators have 
improperly followed the οὐαὶ of the 
ancient Greek versions, and given it 
in terms which express threatening.— 

ww. About the meaning of 
divided. Many, adopting the idea 
expressed by the LXX., γῆς πλοίων 
πτέρυγες, Which is also that dilated 
upon in the Targ., consider the wings 
to signify the sails of ships, and apply 
the passage according to their favourite 
hypotheses —as Ludovic. Legionensis 
to the Spanish fleets carrying out the 
Rowish missionaries to South America, 


and Horsley to Britain employing her 
navy in carrying back the Jews to 
Palestine! Some refer 752) to Aneph, 
an Egyptian idol with wings; while 
others conjecture that the sis¢rwm, or 
winged cymbal, which the Egyptians 


used at their sacrifices, is intended. — 


As 3333 may be referred to 55, in the 
sense of shadowing, it has also been 
supposed that it may apply to Egypt, 
on account of the two ranges of 
mountains by which it is enclosed; 
or, to the regions between the tropics, 
where the shadow falls now towards 
the north, and now towards the south, 
in the course of the day; or, finally, 
to the protection which Egypt pro- 
mised to the Jews. But all these 


‘modes of solution seem fanciful and 


farfetched: so that we are reduced to 
the construction first suggested - by 


CHAP. XVIII.] 


ISAIAH. 


163 


Which art beyond the rivers of Cush ; 
2 Which sendest ambassadors by sea, 


Symm. οὐαὶ γῆς ὁ ἤχος mrepwros; and 
Hct ecuian the pide, either of the 
rustling noise made by the wings of 
locusts, which greatly abound in Egypt, 
or of that made by the arms of soldiers 
when engaged in battle. To the 
former of these interpretations, which 
is that of Hiller, Michaelis, and others, 
it must be objected, that it would not 
afford any characteristic description 
either of Egypt or Ethiopia, since 
locusts abound fully as much in other 
countries of the East. The latter, 
which is ably supported by Gesenius, 
is alone entitled to adoption. 052) we 
have already found to be used in 
application to an army, chap. viii. 8; 
and the reduplicate form of 727%, which 
nowhere occurs in the acceptation of 
shadow, onomatopoetically expresses 
the idea of tinkling, clanging, or rustling, 
and is used, Job xl. 31, of the /ish-spear 
or harpoon, and in the plural, D22x, to 
denote cymbals, 2 Sam. vi. 5; Ps. el. 5. 


Comp.the Arab. (uo , sonuit cum tinnitu 


JSerrum, and wale, cum tonitru quodam 


souuit; hence (hale, tintinnabulum. 


To no country could the words at the 
time more aptly apply than to Ethio- 
pia. Its armies were exceedingly 
numerous. If, as there is reason to 
believe, Zerah, mentioned 2 Chron. 
xiv. 9 (Heb. 8), was king of the African 
Ethiopians, that people was able to 
bring into the field, in the reign of 
Asa, not fewer than a million of men, 
“a huge host with very many chariots 
and horsemen,” 2 Chron. xiv. 8. 
And Tirhakah was so celebrated as a 
mighty conqueror, that Megasthenes 
mentions his having advanced as far 
as the Pillars of Hercules, and classes 
him along with Sesostris and Nebu- 
chadnezzar. Strabo, xv. 1. 6.--ΡὉ 
wa 1, beyond the rivers of Cush. 
Comp. Zeph. ii. 10. Vitringa and 
others, among whom Hitzig, ineffec- 
tually attempt to give to “Ὁ 23y9 the 
sense, ov this side of. It always sig- 
nifies what lies beyond some sea, river, 
&e. which is supposed to be between 


it and the person speaking. Comp. 
Deut. xxx. 13, and for 12, Judg. xi, 
18; Jer. xxv. 22, Hence yma uy, and 
HT Wy, uniformly signify the opposite, 
ἢ. 6. the east side of the Jordan and the 
Euphrates, when used by a writer or 
speaker living to the west of these 
rivers. The instances in which it 
marks the countries to the west of 
them, either contain some qualifying 
term, or place the speaker on the east 
side. That by 3, Cush, according to 


the Phonetic alphabet, E6WW, we 


are here to understand what is com- 
monly called Lthiopia, now known by 
the name of Abyssinia, and neither 
the Arabian Cush, nor that which lay 
towards the Caspian Sea, is generally 
agreed. It was situated on the west 
side of the Red Sea, and comprised 
the regions above Syene, including 
Nubia and Kordofan. It was at times 
subject to the Pharaohs; at other 
times, Upper Egypt was subject to its 
monarchs. The latter was the case 
when Isaiah wrote. A dynasty con- 
sisting of the three kings, already 
mentioned, reigned over Ethiopia, and 
Pathros or the Thebaid, for the space 
of forty or forty-four years, till the 
latter was recovered under Psamme- 
ticus. “ The rivers of Cush,” are the 
three principal streams, _anciently 
denominated the Astaboras,the Astapus, 
and the Astosabas, Strabo, xvii. i. 2, and 
Pliny, and now known by the names 
of the Tucazee, the Mareb, and the 
Bahr-el-Abiad. The Astaboras and the 
Astapus surrounded the large island, 
or rather peninsula, Meroé, on which 
was built the celebrated city of the 
same name. These rivers, flowing 
through the northern parts of Ethi- 
opia, are here appropriately called by 
its name; while the country itself, 
lying for the most part to the south 
of them, and enclosed by them on the 
north, is with equal propriety said to 
116 Jeyond them. 

2. A further description of Ethi- 
opia. The masc. of the Partic. mt 
agrees so far with yx, ver. 1, that it 
borrows from it the idea of people, 


164 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XVIII. 


And in vessels of papyrus on the surface of the waters: 
Go, ye swift messengers, to the nation drawn out and plucked ; 
To the people terrible from the first and onward ; 


which is masc.; so that there is a 
constructio ad sensum. That 0 and 
oy are here synonymous is more than 
doubtful. From their bordering on 
the Red Sea, the Ethiopians must 
have carried on a maritime intercourse 
with the opposite coast of Arabia, and 
eastwards in the direction of India, if 
they did not trade with that country 
itself. To this it has been objected, 
that the small papyrus boats, men- 
tioned immediately after, were alto- 
gether unsuitable for navigating the 
Red Sea; but it is carefully to be 
noticed, that Isaiah does not state that 
the ambassadors who went by sea 
proceeded in such boats; he takes it 
for granted that they would use larger 
vessels, and confines the former to ¢he 
waters, i.e. οἵ the Nile, and other 
rivers in the interior. For this use of 
ao, see Exod. vii. 15, viii. 6—As DE 
is used of images, chap. xlv. 16, Bo- 
chart, Phaleg. iv. 11, supposed that 
the prophet refers to an Egyptian 
custom of annually carrying an image 
of Isis from place to place on the 
rivers; but ambassadors or messengers, 
—which the word clearly signifies, 
Proy,:xins 17. xxvs 19; ‘Isa. lit) 9. 
Jer. xlix. 14; Obad. 1; in most of 
which passages it is, as here, con- 
strued with the verb 2¥,—yields a 
much more suitable sense. The vast 
power and extensive influence of Tir- 
hakah would require an incessant 
transmission of despatches to foreign 
parts, the facilities of which by water 
were great,—Nxpin% the LXX. strangely 
render ἐπιστολὰς βιβλίνας, though, 
living in Egypt, they must have been 
familiar with what is expressed by the 
words. Koppe, however, conjectures 
that the words originally read ἐπὶ 
στόλοις βιβλίνοις. The versions of 
Aquila, ἐν σκεύεσι βιβλίου ; Symm. διὰ 
σκευῶν παπυρίνων; Theod. ἐν σκεύεσι 


παπύρου ; the Syr. Ala? ffse= : 
and the Vulg. iz vasis papyri; give the 


true sense. Reeden skiffs were very 
common in Egypt; and also, according 


to Heliodorus, in Ethiopia Proper. 
They were made of the Egyptian reed 
called papyrus, the cyperus papyrus of 
modern botanists, to which the He- 
brews gave the name of xi, from the 
circumstance of its being porous, and 
thus absorbiny much moisture. 893, 
absorpsit, to drink up; Hiph. to give 
to drink. It was this material of 
which the vessel was constructed to 
which Moses was committed, Exod. ii. 
3. Being exceedingly light, and so 
small that commonly they held only 
one person, they sailed with great 
velocity on the surface of the water, 
ovo75"79; and when the persons who 
navigated them came to a cataract, or 
to a place where the stream was dried 
up, they carried them on their shoul- 
ders till they could again embark. 
See Pliny, xii. 11, vi. 56; Lucan. 
Pharsal. iv. 36; Plutarch de Is. et 
Osir. § 358; Theophrast. Hist. Plant. 
iv. 9; Wilkinson’s Ancient Egyptians, 
vol. 11. p. 185; Kimchi and Lee on 
Job ix. 26, where such vessels are 
called 728 n¥IN, reed-vessels ; and 
Gesen. iz loc. 

Tn Ὁ» DIN, sift messengers, there 
is reference to the DY, ambassadors, 
and to the swiftness with which they 
proceeded on their embassies in the 
papyrus boats. The prophet calls 
upon these to go with all celerity to 
Ethiopia, to announce the wonderful 
interposition of Jehovah for the de- 
liverance of the Jews. Information 
would first of all be conveyed to Tir- 
hakah and his army in Egypt, and 
then to the Thebaid and Ethiopia ; so 
that the whole nation would become 
acquainted with the way in which 
their formidable enemy had been over- 
thrown. Ezek. xxx. 9, is partly pa- 
rallel in point of language, but the 
subject is altogether different.— a 
worm Fro, Gesenius renders actively, 
the nation robust and valiant ; Hitzig, 
tall in growth, and glossy, which he ap- 
plies to the Macrobian Ethiopians ; 
though he is inclined to translate ΠΣ Ὁ, 
long-lived, in reference to their longe- 
vity. But the ancient versions re- 


CHAP. XVIII. | 


ISATAH. 


165 


The nation powerful and victorious, 
Whose country the rivers divide! 


present the words as passive partici- 
ples. In this verse, indeed, the LXX. 
have ἔθνος μετέωρον, but in ver.7, where 
the same words occur, λαοῦ τεθλιμμένου 


ὶ τετιλμένου ; Syr. . an 
kal iS μένου ; Syr. mqtnic? ses 
pe0S0; Vulg. gentem convulsam et di- 


laceratam ; Targ. 872) NOUN NOY, With 
respect to Jon, Gesenius, abandoning 
the usual significations of drawing, 
drawing out, &e., which attach to Ὁ, 
attempts to establish that of being 
strong, firm, &c., but fails in making good 
his point, as may be seen by comparing 
the passages which he adduces in 
proof in his larger Lexicon. The verb 
seems evidently to express the state 
of the Ethiopian nation, during the 
extensive wars of Tirhakah, when the 
mass of the people were drawn out, or 
taken away from their occupations 
and homes; or, as Grotius expresses 
it, “cujus magna pars in longinquis ex- 
peditionibus occupata est.” It is used 
in a military acceptation, Judg. iv. 6, 
xx.37. The interpretation of Vitringa, 
Lowth, Dathe, and others, which con- 
siders the term to be descriptive of 
the great length of Egypt, is quite 
aside from the mark ; since it is the 
people, and not the country, that is 
here the subject. Wo may either be 
a subst. derived from ὍΣ, or a con- 
tracted form of the Pual Part. 2390, 
from 672, which signifies to pluck, tear 
out or away, as the hair, &c., and is here 
used to describe further the condition 
to which the Ethiopians were reduced 
by war: the best part of the popula- 
tion being forced to take the field — 
That oY, people, is identical with *3, 
nation, and that Gesenius is wrong in 
supposing two nations to be meant, 
appears from the repetition of 3, im- 
mediately after. The words are used 
synonymously of the same people.—j2 
TIM NT, lit. from it and edie; is here 
employed in a temporal, and not in a 
local sense, which would not at all suit 
‘the connexion. Comp. Lev. xxii. 27 ; 
1Sam. xviii. 9; Nah. i1. 8 (Heb. 9). The 
phrase is expressive of extreme an- 
tiquity. That the Ethiopians must 


anciently have been a very enterprising 
and formidable people, is evident from 
their having taken possession of so 
large a portion of Africa, founded the 
large cities of Axum, Adule, Meroé, 
and Thebes, and acquired vast quan- 
tities of the precious metals, partly by 
mining, and partly by commerce and 
conquest. There may even bea refer- 
ence to their history long anterior to 
their emigration across the Arabian 
Gulf. wp. No attempt to inter- 
pret these words, according to the usual 
acceptations of 12, has given satisfaction. 
Gesenius happily illustrates them by 


comparing the Arab. 48, power, domi- 


nion, which was first suggested by 
Aurivilius. The repetition is inten- 
sive, as in WB, 3.3, &c. That they are 
properly one word, in a reduplicate 
form, may be inferred from the occur- 
rence of the same form, 92° and 03, 
in verses 1 and 5 of this very chapter. 
—non, trampling, treading down, in 
reference to their treading their ene- 
mies under their feet. That both 
nouns are to be understood in an 
active sense, appears from the use 
of νι), ¢errible, just before—x is a 
ἅπαξ λεγ. Most translators, both an- 
cient and modern, consider it to be 
the same as 3, to plunder, spoil, which 
four of Kennicott’s MSS. exhibit ; and 
expositors give the meaning, spot/, de- 
stroy, in reference either to the land, 
or the people, according as they take 
rivers in a literal or a figurative sense. 
All such interpretations, however, are 
at variance with the connexion, which 
requires an idea to be expressed 
favourable, and not injurious to the 
people spoken of. I am, therefore, in- 
duced to adopt the rendering of 
Gesenius, ¢o cut, divide, comparing 


ma, yea, Arab. ξ pp as in De Sacy’s 


Abd-Allatif. p. 579: δ,» Ul ¢ 5)» the 


water burst forth at the aperture, &e. 
Besides the three large rivers already 
noticed, ver. 1, which may be said 
rather to flow round, than to divide 
the country of Abyssinia, it is inter- 


x 


166 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XVIII. 


3 All ye inhabitants of the world, 
Even ye that dwell on the earth : 
When the standard is raised on the mountains, look ye! 
And when the trumpet is sounded, hear ye! 

4 For thus hath Jehovah said to me: 
I will sit calmly and look on in my dwelling-place ; 
It may be like the serene heat in sun-shine, 
Like a cloud of dew in the heat of harvest; 

5 But before the harvest, when the blossom is gone, 
And the flower has become a ripening fruit, 
He shall cut off the twigs with pruning-hooks, 
And the shoots he shall remove by cutting them off. 


sected by a vast number of minor 
streams, whereby its fertility is greatly 
promoted. See the Travels of Bruce, 
Riippel, &c. 

3, 4. Though the following message 
was specially to be sent to the Ethio- 
pians, it was to be published far and 
wide. All the nations are, therefore, 
summoned to attend to the position of 
the Assyrian army around Jerusalem. 
The siege is just about to commence, 
when the prophet receives the revela- 
tion, that how threatening soever the 
aspect of things may appear, Jehovah 
is not affected by it, but views, in im- 
perturbable majesty, the puny attempt 
of the enemy of his people. <As it 
regards the Babylonians, everything is 
promising: their plan is ripened, as 
the fruit is by intense sunshine and 
the copious dews of night, and they 
are on the very point of carrying it 
into effect, when Jehovah interposes 
and frustrates it—The 2 before ἘΠ 
and 3Y expresses similitude, and is not 
to be taken as a particle of time in 
this place. The reference in the sub- 
stantive verb understood, is not to 
Jehovah, but to the prosperous ap- 
pearance of the Babylonians.—x, Vi- 
tringa, Lowth, Déderlein, and recently, 
Boettcher, render herbs, and others, 
after the Rabbins, rain ; but it is to 
be taken, as Hab. iii. 4, of the shining 
of the Sun. Thus the versions, with 


the exception of the Syriac, if ou 


be not a mistake for }ioaa-—Ten 


MSS., originally three more, and now 
three, the LXX., Syr., and Vulg., read 
ysz ΟΞ, ἐμ the day of harvest, instead 
of ὙῈΡ ba, while there is, or, in the heat 
of harvest. The common reading is 
more appropriate. 

5. ‘21s here adversative. 0m does 
not express the perfection of the blos- 
som, but its ceasing to exist. Comp. 
Ezek. xlvii. 12. 103 properly signifies 
unripe, ΟΥ̓ sour grapes; in the dialects 
it is used more extensively of all un- 
ripe fruit, on account of its acidity. 
ΠῈΣ is the subject of the proposition ; 
but owing to the transposition, ™7 
follows in gender the mas. of the pre- 
ceding predicate, instead of being put 
in the fem. to agree with 722. Inde- 
pendently of this, however, the verb. 
may be in the mas., as occurring before 
the noun. Ewald, p. 352. There is, 
therefore, no necessity, with Lowth, 
to regard the 7 in 72) to be the pron. 
affixing, at the pause for 107, from un, 
a ἅπαξ dey. but evidently allied to the 


Arab. .. to cut off; and placed abso- 


lutely, without a copulative, after the 
manner of the Syriac. The significa- 
tion is given by the LXX. ἀποκόψει.---- 
The prophet compares the hostile 
army to a vineyard or orchard nearly 
ready to be reaped, but all at once 
made completely desolate. The war- 
riors of Sennacherib were not per- 
mitted to engage in battle, and thus, 
in the figurative language of prophecy, 
to be reaped, but were miraculously 
cut off. 


CHAP. ΧΙΧ.] 


ISATAH. 


167 


6 They shall be left together for the ravenous bird of the moun- 


tains, 


And for the wild beast of the earth ; 
The ravenous bird shall summer on them, 
And every wild beast of the earth shall winter on them. 
7 At that time a present shall be brought to Jehovah of Hosts, 
From the people drawn out and plucked ; 
Even from the people terrible from the first and onward ; 
The nation powerful and victorious, 
Whose country the rivers divide, 
To the place of the name of Jehovah of Hosts, 


Mount Zion. 


6. In this verse the figure is drop- 
ped, and instead of the fruit spoken 
of becoming food for the ravenous 
animals, the dead bodies of the enemy 
are to be their repast. ‘273 properly 
signifies any tame animal, but in the 
more elevated style, YI8J M272 is equi- 
valent to ὙΠ m0, a wild beast. Comp. 
Deut. xxviii. 26. Its occurrence in con- 
nexion with Ὅν, a bird of prey, shews 
that such is its meaning here. The dis- 
tribution in the two latter lines of the 
verse is not to be understood as limit- 
ing the ravenous birds to the period 
of summer, and the wild beasts to that 
of winter : it is only a poetical division 
of the whole year. They were to feast 
upon them both summer and winter. 
The verbs jy? and 437 are denomina- 
tives from Y'R, summer, and ΠΤ, winter. 
Vin YY is to be taken collectively of 


the careases of the slain. 

7. The prophet now foreshews what 
would be the result of communicating 
to the Ethiopians, information respect- 
ing the miraculous destruction of the 
Assyrians. That a literal present is 
here meant, there seems no reason to 
doubt ; see 2 Chron. xxxii. 23 ; though 
it is also highly probable that the im- 
pression produced upon that people, 
on the present occasion, paved the 
way for the introduction of revealed 
religion among them at a subsequent 
period, when sacrifices of a nobler cha- 
racter were offered to the Lord_—The 
language is almost identical with that 
employed in the description, ver. 2. 
The prefixing of 1 to DYD evinces, that 
there is an ellipsis of Ὁ before DY, in 
the preceding line. Its being wanting 
in six MSS. has little weight. 


CHAPTER XIX. 


THE SENTENCE OF EGYPT. 


This chapter, which is directed against Egypt, contains a prediction of the 
anarchy and confusion which existed in that country, during, and after, the 
dodecarchy, 1—3 ; the cruelties of Cambyses, 4; great physical and civil 
calamities which followed, 5—10; the infatuation of the Egyptian policy, 


168 ISATAH. [CHAP. XIX. 


11—17 ; the spread of the knowledge and worship of the true God, by means 
of the Jews resident in Egypt, and its deliverance by Alexander the Great, 18 
—22; and the universal religious intercourse which was brought about in the 
East, in the time of the Seleucide, the Ptolemies, and the Romans, 23—25. 

Eayrt, stretching from the Mediterranean Sea on the north, to Ethiopia on 
the south, with the Red Sea on the east, and the Lybian desert on the west, 
and intersected by the Nile throughout the whole of its length, was one of 
the most celebrated countries in the ancient world. According to the gene- 
alogical table, Gen. x., it was peopled after the deluge by Mizraim, one of the 
sons of Ham; hence the names, D2 and 0m, which latter, in the Coptic 
and Sahidiec dialects, ΔΉ ΔΑ: and KH&RE, Chemi, Cheme, i. e. the land 
of Ham, is that still given to the country by the natives. This name was 
also appropriated to one of the great gods of Egypt, who was regarded as 
the generative principle, and was particularly worshipped at Chemnis, or 
Panopolis. The word Mizraim does not occur in hieroglyphics, so far as has 
yet been discovered. See Wilkinson, Second Series, vol. 1, p. 261. The 
early history of Egypt is greatly involved in the obscurity of fable ; but the 
discoveries which continue to be made by learned men, who are devoting 
their time to the study of its antiquities, are successively bringing to light 
a variety of particulars, which furnish us with certain data relative to its 
epochs and some of its most notable events. It appears to have been 
originally subject to a sacerdotal government, during which period, most of 
its magnificent temples were constructed. To this succeeded the monarchy 
of the Pharaohs, the first of whom reigned in the time of Abraham ; and 
the last, Hophra, in that of Jeremiah,—subject to a partial interruption, 
from the period of the Ethiopian conquest, till the accession of Psamme- 
tichus. Since his reign, Egypt has been successively conquered and 
governed by the Persians, Greeks, Romans, Arabs, and Turks, and is at 
present virtually an independent state. The Egyptians had, at a very early 
period, made great progress in the arts, as the elegance and delicacy of their 
sculptured monuments evince, some of which are ascertained to be more 
than 3,500 years old. Their scientific acquirements were more limited, 
owing chiefly to their gross superstitions, in which, and in the idolatrous 
rites and practices connected with them, they exceeded all the other nations 
of antiquity. They worshipped not only the sun and moon, and other 
great objects of nature, but animals, reptiles, and vegetables, such as leeks, 
onions, &c. Notwithstanding the oppression which their ancestors suffered 
in Egypt, the Jews appear all along to have had strong leanings towards 
that country ; and being accustomed to apply to it for assistance, whenattacked 
by any foreign enemy, they transferred to it that confidence which was due 
to Jehovah alone. Hence the numerous threatenings pronounced against 
them on account of their alliances with it; and hence the denunciations 
contained in the present chapter, which were intended to teach them, that, 
instead of affording them any aid, Egypt would itself be reduced and 
oppressed. For lengthened accounts of Egypt, and its dynasties, see 
Vitringa and Gesenius. 


CHAP. ΧΙΧ.] 


ISAIAH. 


169 


1 Benotp! Jehovah shall ride on a swift cloud, 


And shall come to Egypt ; 


And the idols of Egypt shall be moved at his presence, 
And the heart of Egypt shall melt within her. 

2 1 will also arm the Egyptians against the Egyptians, 
And they shall fight each against his brother, 
And each against his neighbour ; 


City against city, 
Kingdom against kingdom. 


ὃ The spirit of Egypt also shall fail within her, 
And J will destroy her counsel ; 
Yea, they may apply to the idols and the necromancers, 
And to the diviners and the wizards: 


1. It is common in Scripture to re- 
present any great calamity, or the in- 
fliction of a remarkable judgment, 
under the idea of the coming of the 
Lord, Ps. 1.3; Isa. xxvi. 21; John xxi. 
23; Jam. v. 8; and to express the 
awful majesty in which he appears on 
such occasions, he is said to come in, 
with, or upon the clouds, Dan. vii. 13; 
Matt. xxiv. 30; Rev.i.7. Here, as in Ps. 
xviii. 9, 10, he is represented as riding 
upon them ; while the swiftness with 
which the calamity was coming upon 
Egypt is expressed by “a light cloud” 
—such moving with great velocity 
before the wind. By a striking pro- 
sopopeeia, the gods of Egypt, such as 
Jupiter Ammon, Osiris, Isis, Typhon, 
Kneph, Pthah, Khem, Sate, Maut, 
Neith, Bubastis, &c., characterised, 
nevertheless, as D2, non-entities, are 
introduced as shaking with fear at the 
approach of Jehovah. The “melting 
of the heart” means /oss of courage, 
confidence, &c., Deut. xx. 8; Josh. v. 1. 
Egypt is here spoken of under the idea 
of a person. 


2. For the meaning of °N302D, 


see 
chap. ix. 10.---- ΠΡ Ὁ 3 ΠΡΟ, hingdom 
against kingdom. This seems distinctly 
to refer to the intestine broils which 
took place at the time of the dode- 
carchy, or the rule of the twelve princes 
who possessed themselves of the 
government, after Sethos, the sacer- 
dotal usurper. Their rule was de- 
signed to be united ; but they soon 


had mutual feuds, which led to a civil. 


war, on the flight of Psammetichus, 
one of their number, by whom Greek 
and Carian mercenaries were intro- 
duced into the country, and the other 
princes put down. Both Herodotus 
and Diodorus Siculus call these princes 
βασιλεῖς, kings ; and it is to their juris- 
diction, and not to the ancient division 
of the country into thirty-six xomes, or 
provinces, as the LXX. give it, that 
the prophet refers when he speaks of 
kingdoms. 

3. On the appearance in Egypt of 
the foreign troops, panoplied in brass, 
which Psammetichus introduced, the 
eleven princes and their counsellors 
were confounded, and had no resource 
left but to apply to their gods. ™ 
and ΠῈΡ are here synonymous: both 
denoting counsel or purpose.—DOS, necro~ 


Arab. αἱ 9 murmur 


edidit, to speak in a low murmuring 
voice, resembling the noise made by a 
new saddle from the motion of a camel, 
and that made by the camel itself 
when fatigued and hungry. See Gol. 
Castel. and Freytag. The reference is 
to the suppressed and hollow tones in 
which the idolatrous impostors imi- 
tated the supposed voice of the gods. 
Comp. for the other terms, chap. Vili. 
19. The Egyptians have in all ages 
been distinguished for the practice of 
the arts of divination, and are still 
greatly addicted to it. They had their 
celebrated oracleof Jupiter Ammon, in 
Thebes; and that of Latona, at Butos 2 


mancers, from Dox 


τὰ τὰ 


170 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP, XIX. 


4 But I will deliver the Egyptians into the hand of a cruel lord, 
And a fierce king shall rule them, 
Saith the Lord Jehovah of Hosts. 

5 The water also shall fail from the sea, 
And the river shall be wasted and dried up. 


and attached to every temple were 
priests, who pretended to give the re- 
sponses of the gods. 

¥. 


4,720, Syr. jam Arab. vials 


only used in Niphal and Piel, but is 
evidently equivalent to 120, 1207, fo 
shut up in the power of any one. In 
this connexion it implies not a mere 
defeat, or partial subjugation, on the 
part of the Egyptians, but the com- 
plete establishment of a foreign rule. 
—TP Ox, some interpreters, after 
the LXX., Syr., Vulg., and op, the 
reading of one MS, render in the 
plural, hard masters; but 02% is used 
intensitively when only one person is 
meant, Gen. xlii. 30, 33; 2 Kings ii. 3, 
5, 16; and the corresponding ty 722 
shews that it must be so taken here; 
which, indeed, the singular number of 
the adjective absolutely requires. Ge- 
senius adopts the opinion of Grotius 
and others, that Psammetichus is 
intended. By his own shewing, how- 
ever, there was nothing in the conduct 
of that monarch deserving the cha- 
racter of cruel or tyrannical. He 
appears, on the contrary, to have 
pursued a liberal policy, and to have 
been a benefactor to the country ; and 
though 240,000 Egyptian troops re- 
volted and emigrated to Ethiopia, this 
appears to have originated solely in 
their being piqued at his retaining 
foreign soldiers in his service, and not 
in any acts of oppression towards 
them, or the inhabitants at large. 
The character rather attaches to Cam- 
byses, who, on the conquest of Egypt, 
B.C. 525, gave vent, in a variety of 
ways, to his mad and ferocious dis- 
position, practised unheard-of cruel- 
ties, destroyed the temples and public 
buildings, violated the sanctuaries of 
the dead, took or destroyed private 
property, ordered the priests to be 
severely whipped for worshipping 
Apis; and such of the Egyptians as 
were found in Memphis engaging in 


this worship, he commanded to be 
slain. Prideaux, pt. i. Ὁ. iii. That 
this conqueror is intended in the pro- 
phecy is rendered more probable by 
the circumstance, that it was he who 
completely subverted the throne of 
the Pharaohs—so that Egypt was then 
reduced to a mere province of the 
Persian empire, and never afterwards 
regained its ancient independence. 
Others are of opinion that, by the 
“fierce king,” Ochus is meant, whose 
barbarities exceeded even those of 
Cambyses ; but the parallelism requires: 
us to apply it to the same person who. 
is called a “cruel lord.” The enor- 
mities of Ochus were merely a renewal. 
of those committed by Cambyses. 

5. To aggravate the calamitous 
condition of the subjugated Egyptians,. 
they were to be visited by a failure in 
the periodical inundation of the Nile, 
on which the prosperity of the country 
mainly depended. This celebrated 
river, which has its springs in the 
mountains of Abyssinia, and enters. 
Egypt at the villages of El-Kalabshe 
and Teffa, a little to the south of 
Syene, rises annually in the months of 
June and July ; in August it overflows. 
its banks, and by the beginning of 
September reaches its highest eleva- 
tion, which is from twenty to twenty-. 
three feet above the usual level. In 
Lower Egypt the rise is not so high,. 
owing to the inundation spreading 
more widely over the low country. 
Numerous canals are dug to receive 
the water, from which it is conveyed 
to irrigate the land. On the subsiding 
of the water, a quantity of mud, 
which it has brought along with it 
and deposited, is left, which greatly 
adds to the fertility of the soil. On 
this mud-covered soil the cultivator 
casts the seed, and the corn soon 
springs up and ripens, in consequence 
of the extreme heat of the sun. 
During the inundation the country 
assumes the appearance of a sea, 


CHAP. XIX.| 


ISATAH. 


171 


6 The streams also shall become putrid ; 
The canals of Egypt shall be emptied and dried up ; 
The reed and the rush shall wither. 
7 The meadows by the river, by the edge of the river, 
And all the produce of the river, 
- Shall be dried up, driven away, and be no more. 
8 And the fishermen shall mourn : 


studded with small islands, on which 
cities, yrising grounds, &c. present 
themselves to the view. Hence the 
propriety of the term 0’, sea, as 
applied to the Nile in this verse, and 


in the Arab. Li] px, the Sea Nile, 


and by way of eminence, a, the 


Sea. Comp. Nah. 11. 8; Herod ii. 97; 
Plin. Nat. Hist. xxxv. 11; and Diod. 
Sic. i. 12, who tells us, Oi yap Αἰγύπτιοι 
νομιζούσιν ᾿Ωκεανὸν εἶναι τὸν παρ᾽ αὐτοῖς 
ποταμὸν Νεῖλον. In the following line 
it is called ὙΠ), absolutely, which is 
peculiar to this place; that term 
‘being elsewhere exclusively appro- 
priated, when thus used, to the 
Euphrates.—n5) the LXX. and others 
derive from nv, fo drink; but it is 
the Niph. of m3, fo destroy by causing 
to fail, to dry up. In 7 and vx there 
is manifestly a gradation: the former 
signifying rather the failure of the 
water; the latter, complete desicca- 
tion. The desiccation of the Nile is 
destructive of the agricultural interest 
in Egypt, and of all that is dependent 
‘on it. 

6, 7. A most graphic description of 
the physical consequences that would 
immediately follow from the failure of 
the water. %7N7 is either a double 
form, compounded of the Chaldee 
preformant δὲ in Aphel, and the He- 
brew 7 in Hiphil; or, it is an accom- 
modation to the forms ΡΝ, TY, Paz, 
in which the δὶ with a Segol is placed 
before a sibilant in a mixed syllable. 
See Hitzig. Travellers greatly com- 
plain of the foul and putrid state of 
the water which remains in the 
streams or canals after the Nile has 
subsided, the foetid effluvium of which 
is most destructive—OWN, the plural 


of 1, 1APo, 1€ PO, the native word 
for river. It here denotes the branches 


or minor divisions of the Nile— xz», 
which our translators have rendered 
defence, is the singular of ΘΒ, and 
seems employed specially to denote 
Lower Egypt, just as the dual is ex- 
pressive of the two divisions of the 
country into Upper and Lower—a 
distinction recognised in the title 
“Lord of the two regions,” which 
was assumed by every monarch of 
the country at the time of his coro- 
nation, and represented by the pshent, 
or double crown, which was placed 
upon his head on the occasion. The 
Arabs give to Egypt the corresponding 


name ὁ in the sing.; and Ibn 


Batuta states, that, in his time, Cairo 


was called yon Misr.—nvw, from ™», 


to be naked, the woodless and uncultivated 
but verdant spots on the banks of the 
river, which were used for meadows or 
pasturage. ‘x’ yin, lit. the seed of the 
river, but YY is also used for the crop 
which is produced from the seed, Job 
mex, UO Isa. ex 3. TX τὸ 
σπειρόμενον διὰ τοῦ ποταμοῦ. 

8. In this, and the two following 
verses, the prophet introduces those 
classes of the inhabitants whose occu- 
pations were more immediately con- 
nected with the river. The Nile was 
anciently much celebrated for the 
multitude, variety, and excellence of 
its fish. Numb. xi. 5; Herod. ii. 93; 
Strabo, xvii. 2.4; Diod. Sic. i. 36, 40; 
Wilkinson’s Ancient Egyptians, vol. 
iii. p. 683—68, That it is equally so 
still may be seen from the travels of 
Sonnini, pp. 407—417, 474 --- 478. 
Fishermen must, therefore, have formed 
a numerous class among the inhabit- 
ants.—On the ground that nets are 
not now used by the fishermen of 
Egypt, it has been maintained by 
some, that by ΠΟΘ is meant a twiggen 


172 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XIX. 


Yea, all that cast the hook into the river shall lament ; 
And those that spread nets upon the surface of the waters shall 


languish. 


9 And the flax-dressers shall be confounded, 


And the weavers of linen. 


10 Her pillars also are broken down, 


or wicker trap, but against such inter- 
pretation, the use of 018, fo spread, to 
spread out, a8 well as DYE %Y, is an 
insuperable objection. Besides, the 
ancient use of the net is seen in the 
representation of one on a monument 
at Thebes, in Wilkinson, wt swp. vol. 
iii. p. 55.—For instances of the nomen 
regens being separated from its geni- 
tive, as in 737 WI Ὁ, see Gen. vil. 
6; Job xv. 10; Isa. lii. 14. The same 
mode of construction occurs in the 
Arabic poetry and formulas of swear- 
ing. Gesen. Lehrgeb. p. 675. 

9. nip ond av, LXX. τὸ λίνον τὸ 


σχιστόν: Hexap. Syr. aso ala; 


Symm. τὸ λίνον τὸ κτενιστόν: lit. the 
workers of combed flax; but the mean- 
ing is, not that they were employed in 
manufacturing it after it was combed, 
but in hatcheling or combing it. See, 
for an account of this process, Pliny, 
xix. 1; Wilkinson, vol. iii. p. 139. 
The former branch of labour belonged 
to the “Nn Unk, the weavers of linen 
cloth. 4, which occurs only in this 
antiquated form, like "τῷ, ‘13, is de- 
rived from WW, fo be or become white; 


Arab. , white silk; Eth. ἐπ 26: 


white cotton; LXX. rods ἐργαζομένους 
τὴν βύσσον. Both flax and cotton 
abounded in Egypt; and the manu- 
facturing of linen and cotton cloths 
afforded support to many thousands 
of its inhabitants. They are still 
among its most valuable productions. 
In the year 1835, more than 100,000 
bales of cotton, each weighing upwards 
of an hundred-weight, were shipped at 
Alexandria. Jn ancient times, linen 
was worn by the people generally as 
shirts; and, according to Herod. ii. 
37, the priests were not permitted to 
wear any thing else: at least when 
they performed the sacred rites. The 
exportation of linen yarn, and fine 
linen cloth, is mentioned 1 Kings x. 


28; Ezek. xxvii. 7. See also Wilkin- 
son, ut sup. vol. ili. pp. 113—127, 
where an interesting account will be 
found of the Egyptian linen, especially 
that forming the bandages of the 
mummies.—Those engaged in pre- 
paring and manufacturing these mate- 
rials are here mentioned along with 
the fishermen, on account of their 
hatcheling and bleaching on the 
banks of the Nile and its canals. 

10. ΘΙ ΞΟ τηρῶ, Those who wish 
to see the numerous and conflicting 
interpretations which have been given 
of this verse, may consult Rosenmiiler, 
in loc. 2d edit. That of Gesenius is at 
once simple and satisfactory: viz. that 
the two grand divisions of society in 
the East, the upper and lower classes, 
are meant ; the former metaphorically 
called pillars, or supporters of the 
state, and the latter characterised as 
labouring for hire. Tin occurs only 
once besides, Ps. xi. 3, where, after 
Aquila, our translators render it 
foundations. It is obviously derived 
from ™0, to place, set, lay; and may 
either refer to pillars or foundations, 
though the use of x37 immediately 
following, renders the former the more 


probable. Comp. iJ os the 


pillars of state, in use among the Per- 
sians. The leading men in the country 
being intended, the participle is of the 
mas. gen. though the noun is fem. 
Dw27D, deaten, broken, is doubly appro- 
priate. It corresponds literally to the 
idea of broken pillars, but, in agree- 
ment with the figurative sense in 
which that term is here used, it signi- 
fies broken in spirit—The meaning of 
‘20 “vy given in the translation is 
secured by Prov. xi. 18, which should 
be rendered, 
“ As for the wicked, he worketh. for 
deceitful wages ; ὶ 
But he who soweth righteousness, fo 
a sure reward,” 


CHAP. 51Χ.] 


ISATAH. 173 


And all the hired labourers are grieved in mind. 
11 Surely the princes of Zoan are fools ; 
As for the sage counsellors of Pharaoh, their counsel is become 


stupid : 


How then can ye say to Pharaoh, 


Ζύθον, barley-wine, the rendering of the 
LXX., has the support of three only 
of De Rossi’s MSS., which read 120.— 
The interpretation just given evinces 
that the antithetic ninv is to be under- 
stood of persons and not of θεσμοῦς, 
laws, as Syrom. has it, or any neuter 
subject whatever—)) "228 so evi- 
dently corresponds to 08372 in the 
sense of grieved in spirit, broken-hearted, 
that it is strange any other construc- 
tion could have been put upon the 
phrase; much more, that it should 
have been rendered fish-ponds, &c. 
Dax, indeed, signifies a marsh, a pool 
of stagnant water, or a pool generally ; 
but never in connexion as here with 
wa. The adjective is evidently cog- 
nate both with it, and with 02Y, 70 
stand still, be stagnant, astounded, 


grieved, &e. Comp. the Arab. eal, 


JSastidivit, nauseum concepit ; ΡΞ» ager 


animi; Chald. 038, tristatus est, in an- 
gore fuit; and see Lee on Job xxx. 25, 
where ‘52 192” has the same meaning. 

11. Having, in the preceding verse, 
specified the magnates of Egypt gene- 
rally, Isaiah now turns to the courtiers 
in particular; and in this, and the two 
following verses, exposes the folly of 
their counsels, and the destructive 
character of their influence. ΟΞ, in 


Egypt., ANH, οὐ VANE, signify- 
ing low, inferior, Gr. Tans, Arab. wl : 


Zoan, Or Tanis, one of the principal 
cities of Lower Egypt, and a royal 
residence of the Pharaohs. It was of 
great antiquity, as the notice Numb. 
ΧΗ]. 22 implies; and was the scene of 
the miracles performed by Moses, Ps. 
xxviii. 12, 43. Its sculptured monu- 
ments testify to its existence in the 
age of Rameses the Great, 7.c. 3190 
years ago. Wilkinson’s Manners and 
Customs of the Ancient Egyptians, 
vol. 1. pp. 5, 6. A difference of opinion 


has obtained respecting its exact situ- 
ation; but it is now generally agreed 
that it lay on the east of that branch 
of the Nile, which takes its name 
from it, at the N.W. of Tahpanhes, 
and at no great distance from the sea 
of Menzaleh. Extensive ruins are 
still visible around the spot, and 
several obelisks and other monuments 
of former magnificence have been 
found among them. See Gesenius, iz 
loc. and Wilkinson, wf sup—The con- 
struction of two nouns with the geni- 
tive following, as in TD ἜΣ "937, is 
not without example. See Judg. v. 
29. In the latter half of the verse, 
notice is taken of the claims which 
the counsellors of Pharaoh laid to 
ancestorial wisdom and royal descent. 
Each of them is introduced as boast- 
ing: “Tam the son of sages; the son 
of ancient kings.” Such construction 
is more suited to the connexion than 
that which represents them as putting 
the words into the mouth of the mon- 
arch. The boast was quite accordant 
with the notions and usages which 
existed among the ancient Egyptians. 
Their kings were partly chosen from 
the order of the priests; and, as there 
were different dynasties, the descend- 
ants of such kings as had been set 
aside, surrounding the person of the 
monarch in the capacity of coun- 
sellors, or forming a sacred college, 
would naturally be proud of their 
parentage, and the lessons of wisdom 
which had been handed down to them 
from antiquity. Herodotus tells us, 
that the priests whom he consulted 
affirmed, that from the first king to 
Sethos, the priest of Vulcan, there 
had been ¢hree hundred and forty-one 
high-priests and kings; and, conduct- 
ing him into a spacious temple, they 
shewed him colossal statues of these 
priests; each during his life having 
placed there a statue of himself. 
Herod. ii. 141; Plut. de 1514. et Osir. 
p. 452, edit. Wittenb. The preten- 


y 


174 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP, XIX. 


Τ am the son of sages, the son of ancient kings ? 


12 Where now are thy sages ; 


Let them now shew thee, if they know, 

What Jehovah of Hosts hath purposed concerning Egypt. 
13 The princes of Zoan are infatuated ; 

The princes of Noph are deceived ; 

The corner-stones of her tribes 


Have caused Kgypt to err. 


sions of the ancient Egyptians, like 
those of the Chinese, to extreme 
antiquity, are well known: of their 
wise men and their wisdom, mention 
is made Exod, vil. 11; 1 Kings iv. 30; 
Acts vil. 22; whence it appears to 
have been proverbial; and one of 
their kings, Bocchoris the Saite, ob- 
tained, by way of pre-eminent distinc- 
tion, the surname of “The Wise.” 
They were deeply skilled in astro- 
nomy, geometry, architecture, philo- 
sophy, mythology, metaphysics, astro- 
logy.——The name 78, Pharaoh, in 


Coptic Ov Po, king, and, with the 


article, TOY PO or cor PO, the king, 
was common to all the kings of Egypt 
down to the time of the Persian 


conquest. Comp. the Arab. & yp τώ 


quod summum est, hence princeps, and 
the Heb. nivw, Judg. v. 2; and see 
Robinson on this passage, Bib. Rep. 
vol, i. pp. 579—581. In the present 
day, [bn Pharaoon, “son of a Pharaoh,” 
is a great term of reproach among the 
Kgyptians. Wilkinson, wf sup. 53. 
This writer, in his Second Series, vol. 
i. pp. 287, 288, derives the name from 
Re or Ra, “Sun ;” with the definite 
article, Pi, Pire, Phré, Phrah, Pharaoh ; 
and affirms that this regal title was 
probably owing to the idea, that, as 
the sun was the chief of the heavenly 
bodies, he was a fit emblem of the 
king who was the ruler of all on 
earth. 
12. Comp. ch. xli. 22, 23: xliv. 7. 


13. *p, Hos. ix. 6, 7, Copt. Qaeqt 
and QREKKCTE, Arab. Core, ΤΧΧ. 


and Class. Gr. authors, Μέμφις, Memphis, 


the second capital and celebrated ne 
cropolis of Egypt. In hieroglyphics 
it is written J/en-nofri, followed by a 
pyramid. Wilkinson, w/ sup. vol. 1. p. 
175. According to Plutarch, Isid et 
Osir. p. 472, edit. Wittenb., the name 
signifies ὄρμος ἀγαθῶν, the haven of the 
good, in reference to their being buried 
there; which derivation is in the 
main justified by Jablonsky, Opuse. 
ii. p. 131, and Champollion, lEgypt 
sous les Pharaons, tome 1. p. 363. An 
immense number of mummies have 
been discovered in and around the 
spot where it stood, many of them 
between two and three thousand years 
old, so that there is a singular propriety 
in the declaration, Hos. ix. 6, D737A AY, 
Memphis shall bury them. It was situ- 
ated near the present village of Moniat- 
Rahinet, four or five miles south-east 
of Old Cairo, on the opposite bank of 
the Nile, and appears to have occupied 
the whole space between the pyramids 
of Gizeh and those of Sacarah. <Ac- 
cording to Josephus, it was founded 
by Menes, the first of the Egyptian 
kings, upwards of thirteen hundred 
years before the time of Solomon. 
A colossus, and fragments of several 
statues, bearing the name of Rameses 
the Great, are still met with among 
the ruins; but otherwise every vestige 
of its former grandeur has completely 
disappeared. It continued to be a 
royal residence till the times of the 
Ptolemies, when it began to fall into 
decay. In the twelfth century, Edrisi 
describes its ruins as extending nine 
miles in every direction, but even 
then containing works of the most 
stupendous character. Among others 
he mentions a monolithic temple of 
granite, thirteen feet and a half high, 
twelve long, and seven broad, entirely 


CHAP. XIX. | 


14 


ISATAH. 175 


Jehovah hath poured into the midst of her a perverse spirit, 


So that Egypt is made to err in all her works, 
As a drunkard staggereth in his vomit. 
15 And Egypt shall have no work, 


That the head or the tail, 


perform. 
16 


covered within and without with in- 
scriptions ; and statues of great beauty 
and dimensions, one of which was 
forty-five feet high, and consisting of 
a single block of red granite.—The 1 
prefixed to wn, though supported by 
the ancient versions, with the excep- 
tion of the Targ. and Vulg., is omitted 
in one hundred and six MSS., fourteen 
early printed editions, and upwards of 
twenty more. It is evident from its 
use, Judg. xx. 2, Ps. exviii. 22, and 
other passages, that 728, which pro- 
perly signifies a corver or corner-stone, 
from its prominence and utility in 
supporting the united walls of an 
edifice, is here employed metaphori- 
cally to denote a prince or chief: Ro- 
senmiiller and others aptly compare 
the Arab. | $,, which Saadias uses in 
this place, as occurring in the phrases 
ysl) op) the pillar of the empire ; 
ἘΠῚ τ yp the pillar of religion, though 
it also primarily signifies azgulus. 
The frequent occurrence of collective 
nouns in Hebrew, shews that m2 is 
properly pointed, and is not to be 
changed into ΠΞΞ, the plural punctua- 
tion.—What the 229 of Egypt is de- 
signed to describe is not quite certain. 
The most probable opinion is, that the 
inhabitants of the different nomes or 
prefectures are meant into which the 
nation was divided. 

14. The proper signification of 79 
is fo mix, but, as the mixing of liquids 
was effected by pouring one kind into 
a vessel containing that with which it 
was to be mingled, it is so to be taken 
in the present figurative use of the 


term.—ovy, from my, uss te bend, 
make crooked, stands for Dww, perversi- 
fies: the gemination, as usual, indi- 
cating intensity of signification, The 


the branch or the rush may 


In that day the Egyptians shall be as women ; 


doctrine taught in this verse is the 
same as that found in chap. xxix. 10; 
Exod. iv. 2f; Rom. ix. 18, xi. 7, 8; 
which is not to be understood as 
asserting any positive or direct in- 
fusion of evil on the part of God— 
such an idea being totally repugnant 
to the holiness of his character,—but 
his punitively withholding the exer- 
tion of certain influences, by which 
men might have been restrained ; or, 
his so ordering things in his provi- 
dence, that they, as free agents, shall 
take occasion from them to do what is 
wrong. Since all intelligence and 
wisdom is referred to him as its 
source, however it may be acquired 
and improved by its possessors, there 
is no violence in ascribing its with- 
drawment to his displeasure. It is 
very common in Scripture to speak of 
God’s actually doing what he permits, 
or for the voluntary perpetration of 
which, on the part of man, he merely 
furnishes occasions in the holy proce- 
dure of his moral government. See 
2 Sam. xii. 11, xxiv. 1, and comp. the 
remarks on Isa, vi. 10.—The conjunc- 
tion } in 277 marks the event; and 
the third plural of Hiph. is used as 
freq. with a singular passive significa- 
tion.—The comparison at the end of 
the verse is quite in keeping with the 
use of 702, in the sense of pouring in 
intoxicating ingredients. Comp. chap. 
MMVII 75 8. 

15. The > in on) forms the dative 
of possession. A total stagnation of 
business would be the result of the 
infatuated counsels of Egypt. For 
the metaphors, see remarks on chap. 
ix, 13, 14. 

16, 17. These verses describe the 
dispirited condition of the inhabit- 
ants, and their inability to resist the 
least powerful of their external foes. 
The mere rumour that the Jews, who 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP, XIX 


For they shall tremble and fear, 
At the shaking of the hand of Jehovah of Hosts, 
Which he shall shake at them. 

17 And the land of Judah shall be a terror to Egypt; 
Every one to whom it is mentioned shall be afraid, 
Because of the purpose of Jehovah of Hosts, 
Which he hath purposed against them. 


18 In that day there shall be five 


were accustomed to look to Egypt for 
succour, were preparing an expedition, 
would be sufficient to strike terror 
into every bosom. The reference is to 
a period subsequent to the restoration 
from Babylon, when the Jewish power 
had again begun to increase, under 
the protection of the Persian mon- 
archs. By the shaking of the hand of 
the Lord is meant the approach of 
Cambyses towards Egypt—o°E) is 
here used for the Hyyptians, but 15 
taken collectively, as the gender and 
number both of the verbs and pro- 
nouns shew.—*:7 occurs only in this 
place. Schultens, Michaelis, Dathe, 
and others, derive the word from the 


Arab. La, confugit, refugit ; and sup- 


pose the prophet to mean, that Juda 
would, under such circumstances, be 
lam, a refuge, for the Egyptians. 
Other conjectures have been offered. 
There seems no substantial reason 
why 30 should not be considered as 
the Chald. orthography of 727, which 
is found in seven of Kennicott’s Co- 
dices, three of De Rossi’s, and three 
printed editions. Comp. xv? for 79, 
Ruth. i. 20; ἘΠῚ} for 7p, Ezek. xxvii. 
31; 82 for 720, Ps. cxxvii. 2. Gesenius 
regards it as derived from 237 (as 27, 
to describe a circle,) to move round and 
round ; hence to reel or stagger, and 
consequently applicable, according to 
the use of that verb in Ps. evii. 27, to 
the emotion of amazement, bewilder- 
ment, fear, consternation, terror. Thus 
the LXX., Aq., Theod., Targ., Syr., 
and Vulg.— 02: is improperly sepa- 
rated from the °29 following, by the 
Athnach, which perplexes the entire 
sentence, and has led to the combina- 
tion We Vx, contrary to the usage of 
the language. 


cities in the land of Egypt, 


18. For the latitude with which the 
phrase 8177 OF2 is used, see chap. iv. 2. 
The prophet had in his eye the period 
which commenced with the Persian 
conquest of Egypt, and comprehended 
the subsequent condition of that 
country.—Five, is supposed by Clarius, 
Preb. Lowth, Rosenmiller, and others, 
to be a definite number used for an 
indefinite; and Gesenius adduces a 
number of passages in proof, but not 
one of them is to the point. Le Clere, 
Bp. Newton, and Hitzig, take the term 
literally, and are of opinion, that 
Heliopolis, Leontopolis, Migdol, Daphne, 
and Memphis, are meant. See Jer. 
xliv. 1—yp22 nbw, the lip, i.e. the lan- 
guage, of Canaan, or, the language 
spoken in the land of Canaan—there 
being an ellipsis of S78 before 7533, as 
in Exod. xv. 15. That by this desig- 
nation the Hebrew language is meant, 
with special reference to its having 
been that spoken by the original 
inhabitants of Canaan, is agreed on all 
hands. It has, however, been ques- 
tioned whether the prophet is to be 
understood as asserting that this lan- 
guage would actually be spoken by the 
inhabitants of the afore-mentioned 
cities ; or whether the term //p is not 
rather to be taken figuratively of con- 
Jession or profession, and the whole 
phrase to mean the public avowal of 
true religion. In support of the latter 
view, an appeal has been made to 
Zeph. ii. 9, where the Lord promises 
to turn to the people 72 ADL, a pure 
lip; and to the latter half of this 
verse, in which swearing to Jehovah 
appears to be parallel. It is not im- 
probable, however, that the reference 
is to the Hebrew language as employed 
in the public worship of Jehovah, 
which the Jews instituted in Egypt ; 
and as the native proselvtes joined in 


CHAP. XIX. | 


ISAIAH. in Fi 


Speaking the language of Canaan, 
And swearing to Jehovah of Hosts ; 


such worship, they might not im- 
properly be said to speak the language 
in which it was performed. Even 
after the introduction of the Greek 
into that country, and that of the 
Greek version among the Jews, the 
law continued to be publicly read in 
the original, just as it is in all the 
synagogues at the present day. Nor 
must it be forgotten that the emigra- 
tion of Jews from Palestine to Egypt 
was so great under the Ptolemies, and 
the privileges conceded to them by 
these monarchs were so numerous, 
that the prevalence of Hebrew for a 
time, in certain cities of which they 
may have formed the principal part of 
the population, is by no means incon- 
ceivable. Could we rely on the ac- 
count of Aristeas, it would seem that 
not fewer than 198,000 Jewish cap- 
tives were released by Ptolemy Phila- 
delphus, so that the number of Jews 
resident in Egypt must have been very 
great.—To swear to Jehovah, means to 
profess allegiance to him, publicly to 
protest and avow that He alone is the 
object of adoration and religious obe- 
dience. Comp. chap. xlv. 23; Rom. 
xiv. 11.—For oy Vy, the City of De- 
struction, Which several of De Rossi’s 
Codices express by DVT] YY, sixteen 
MSS., and several printed editions, 
read Duya VY, the City of the Sun, which 
is supported by the renderings of the 
Complutensian edition of the LXX., 
Symm., Vulg., Arab., Saad., the Tal- 
mud, and other Jewish testimonies. 
Whether Aq. and Theod. also so read, 
is uncertain. The Targ. unites both 
readings. The present is one of the 
only two passages in the Hebrew 
Bible in which Eichhorn is inclined to 
admit that the Jews have been guilty 
of wilful corruption ; and certainly 
there is ground to suspect that it has 
been tampered with, in support of 
party prejudice. We learn from Jo- 
sephus and other Jewish authorities, 
that Onias, son of the high-priest 
Onias ITI., whose right it was to have 
succeeded to the office, finding that the 
high-priesthood was transferred by 
Antiochus to another family, fled into 


Egypt, where he so effectually recom- 
mended himself by his talents to 
Ptolemy Philometor, and his queen 
Cleopatra, that, in the year B.c. 149, 
he was appointed commander-in-chief 
of the army ; and soon after, he and 
Dositheus, one of his countrymen, 
had committed to them the entire 
administration of the government. 
Availing himself of his popularity, 
Onias persuaded the king to grant him 
permission to build a temple for the 
religious services of the numerous 
Jews resident in Egypt, and actually 
constructed one on the site of an an- 
cient temple of Bubastis, or Isis, at 
the city of Leontopolis, in the Helio- 
politan nome, of which he was governor. 
This erection corresponded, in minia- 
ture, to the temple at Jerusalem. 
Onias himself became high-priest ; 
other lineal priests and Levites were 
appointed ; and the whole service was 
conducted strictly according to the 
Mosaic ritual. The temple continued 
to be thus used till the time of the 
emperor Vespasian, who ordered it to 
be shut up and finally destroyed, on 
account of the attempts of the Egyp- 
tian Jews to throw off the Roman 
yoke. Joseph. Antiq. lib. iii. cap. iii. 
§ 1—3, xx. x. § 1. Con. Apion. hb. ii. 
cap. v. Wolfii Biblioth. Hebr. tom. iv. 
p. 353. Talmud. Joma, 4. Maimon. 
Menachoth, 6. 

To justify this undertaking, Onias 
appealed to the 19th verse of this 
chapter, by which the scruples of 
many of his brethren were removed ; 
but it would seem that strong preju- 
dices continued to be excited and 
fostered against it, most likely by 
Palestinian Jews ; for the text of the 
LXX., if not originally, yet very early 
exhibited the reading, πόλις ᾿Ασεδέκ, 
ἢ.6. PIS Vy, the City of Righteousness : 
—a reading copied in the Hexaplar 


Syriac, «ο]»}.] 12a.,80, which in- 


serts in the margin the readings of 
Aq., Symm., and 'Theod., but takes no 
notice of the Complutensian ’Ayépes, 
so that it cannot have existed in the 
MSS. consulted by Origen. So violent 


178 


ISATAH. 


|CHAP, XIX. 


One of them shall be called THE City oF THE Sun. 
19 In that day there shall be an altar to Jehovah, 


a departure from the Hebrew text, on 
the part of the Alexandrian Jews, 
could only have been proyoked by 
something similar on that of their 
brethren in Palestine, who, finding the 
use to which they applied the text, in 
all probability changed D777 into D}77, 
and thus characterised Heliopolis, the 
city of the Sua, as that of destruction, 
to which they wished it might be 
devoted. What warrants this con- 
clusion, in addition to this circum- 
stance, and the support it derives 
from the authorities above quoted, 
which sustain D137, is the total irrele- 
vance of the common reading in such 
a context. Were the prophet still 
denouncing judgments against the 
Egyptians, there would be some pro- 
priety in his giving to one of its cities 
the name of “the city of destruction ;” 


but he is speaking of the establishment - 


of the worship of the true God, in 
application to which nothing would 
be more out of place. 

Other interpretations have been 
proposed, as that of Iken, in his 16th 
Dissert. Philol. Theol., who derives 


the word from the Arab. my? a 


strong voracious Lion, and accordingly 
renders the words Leontopolis; in 
which he is followed by Michaelis, 
Déderlein, and Dathe. But to this 
Rosenmiller justly objects, that there 
is no such name of the lion in Hebrew, 
though the language has a number of 
names by which to designate that 
animal. The same objection les 
against the translation of Gesenius, 
“the city of deliverance,’ deriving the 


noun from the Arab. Urey» servavit, 


custodivit. Hitzig is decidedly in favour 
of Heliopolis, though his opinion that 
ow signifies the orb or disk of the sun, 


from Dw, Arab. Uys , to scrape, &e., 


ee, 


is altogether fanciful. The word is 
otherwise clearly used in Hebrew to 
denote the sun, Judges viii. 13, xiv. 18 ; 
Job ix. 7. In this opinion, which is 
that adopted by Vitringa, Lowth, and 
Jenour, 1 fully coneur, as best satisfy- 


ing all the claims of the text. I will 
only add that Coverdale renders, 
‘And Heliopolis shall be one of 
them.” The native name of Heliopolis 


was UN, Heb. fx, Ov: afterwards, 


wow m2, Beth-Shemesh, i. e. the house, 
or temple of the Sun; Jer. xliii. 
13, which one of Kennicott’s MSS. 
exhibits in this place. It stood a few 
miles to the north of Memphis, about 
the site of the present village of Mata- 
rich ; and was celebrated for the beau- 
tiful temple of the sun, and the nu- 
merous Obelisks which were erected 
around it. Leontopolis, where the 
Jewish temple was built, stood some 
miles still farther north, and its ruins 
are now known by the name of Z¢/- 


loudieh, 1.6. (5.2 ub, The Jews heap ; 


where, no doubt, monuments and in- 
scriptions will yet be found, illustra- 
tive of the Jewish history. 

The specification of Heliopolis, as 
one of the five cities in which the 
worship of the true God should be 
performed, seems to have been occa- 
sioned by its being, at the time the 
prophet wrote, one of the principal 
seats of Egyptian idolatry. 

19. Commentators generally take 
the “altar” and “ pillar” here spoken 
of ina figurative sense, and some, as 
Gesenius, regard them as collective 
nouns, intimating that spiritual wor- 
ship would be rendered to Jehovah 
throughout the land of Egypt. Since, 
however, the prophecy has respect to a 
period prior to the introduction of the 
Gospel economy, we are not at liberty 
to interpret the terms otherwise than 
literally ; and as, during the period 
referred to, myriads of Jews were 
resident in Egypt, and worshipped the 
God of their fathers, there seems no 
valid reason why we should not con- 
sider the altar to be that erected by 
Onias at Leontopolis. It may, indeed, 
be objected that such a prediction 
would sanction the violation of the 
Mosaic statute, which ordained that 
sacrifices should nowhere be offered 
except at the place which God should 


CHAP. XIX.] 


ISATAH. 


179 


In the midst of the land of Egypt, 
And a pillar at its boundary to Jehovah ; 
20 And it shall be for a sign and a witness 
For Jehovah of Hosts in the land of Egypt ; 
Because they cried to Jehovah on account of the oppressors, 


choose, Deut. xii. 5—14: but it must 
be recollected that this enactment 
had an exclusive reference to Pales- 
tine, to the circumstances of the 
Israelites as exposed to idolatry in 
that country, and to the theocracy as 
established among them there. Had 
they been at liberty to sacrifice pri- 
vately, i.e. each at his own altar, it 
would infallibly have led to idolatrous 
practices, as the event proved, in the 
numerous instances in which they 
transgressed the commandment. None 
of these reasons apply to the Egyptian 
Jews. The theocracy was drawing to 
its close. Few, comparatively, of the 
Jews in Egypt could repair to Jerusa- 
lem at the appointed festivals. No 
encouragement was given to private 
sacrifice. The establishment at Leon- 
topolis was exclusive ; and Onias, who 
would have succeeded to the priest- 
hood at Jerusalem, if he had not been 
unjustly deprived of it, had alone the 
right to officiate in holy things, and 
not Alcimus, who only exercised the 
office of high-priest in virtue of his 
having been invested with it by An- 
tiochus. Joseph. Antiq. lib. xii. cap. 
9,§7. In justification of his conduct, 
he might have pleaded the example of 
the prophet Elijah, who, notwithstand- 
ing the prohibition given to the He- 
brews generally, did, upon an extra- 
ordinary occasion, offer sacrifice on 
Mount Carmel, 1 Kings xviii. 30—38. 
Nor does it appear that this central 
worship in Egypt had the smallest in- 
fluence in leading the Jews to practise 
idolatry, but the contrary. It tended 
to wean them from an undue attach- 
ment to Jerusalem, as “the place 
where men ought to worship,” as well 
as to attract the surrounding idolaters 
to the service of Jehovah ; and as both 
temples were destroyed, under the 
same Roman emperor, within a few 
months of each other, and no provision 
was made in the Hebrew Scriptures 
for any future erection of the kind, it 


was demonstrated to the Jews, that 
henceforth, neither at Jerusalem nor 
elsewhere, were men exclusively to 
worship the Father, but that iz every 
place incense should be offered to his 
name, and a pure offering, Mal. i. 11. 

The 7229, pillar, appears to have 
been a commemorative obelisk. It was 
customary, from the most ancient 
times, to set up a cippus, or pillar, on 
remarkable occasions. See Gen. xxviii. 
18, xxxi. 45, xxxv. 14; 1 Sam. vii. 12; 
Exod. xxiv. 4; in the last of which 
passages the term 7329 occurs, as here, 
In connexion with 1392, az altar; 
whence it may be inferred, that the 
monument to be erected in Egypt was 
designed to induce those who beheld 
it to worship that God to whom it was 
dedicated, and whose glorious name 
was, in all probability, inscribed upon 
it. Egypt abounded in such obelisks, 
some of which were of immense size ; 
and many of them remain at the pre- 
sent day. It is to those at Heliopolis, 
which were dedicated to the sun, that 
Jeremiah refers, and the destruction 
of which he predicts, chap. xliii. 13. 
The situation of this pillar is stated to 
be at the boundary of Egypt; but 
whether Tahpanhes, or Pelusium, as 
the northern frontier, or Syene as the 
southern, be meant, cannot be deter- 
mined. 

20. Whatever might be the private 
views of the Jews in the erection of 
the altar and the pillar, it was the de- 
sign of Jehovah that they should fur- 
nish a visible testimony to the Egyp- 
tians of his existence and character. 
They would be reminded by them of 
his gracious interposition in behalf of 
his worshippers in the days of Hezekiah 
and Cyrus, and of what he had done 
for their own country in delivering 
them from the galling yoke of the 
Persians. That the deliverer here 
predicted was Alexander the Great, 
there can be little doubt. After that 
monarch had been at Jerusalem, he 


180 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XIX. 


And he sent them a saviour, and a defender, and delivered them. 


21 


And Jehovah shall make himself known to the Egyptians, 


And the Egyptians shall know Jehovah in that day, 
And shall serve him with sacrifice and oblation ; 
They shall also make a vow to Jehovah, and perform it. 


But he will heal them ; 


Jehovah shall indeed long smite the Egyptians, 


For they shall turn to Jehovah, 
And he will be propitious to them, and will heal them. 


23 


In that day there shall be a highway from Egypt to Assyria; 


So that the Assyrians shall come to Egypt, and the Egyptians 


to Assyria ; 


proceeded to Egypt, where he was 
hailed with the greatest joy by the in- 
habitants. Their nobles went as far 
as Pelusium to do him homage ; and 
their Persian oppressors were forced 
to surrender without striking a blow. 
—1) is the Ben. partic. of 1, fo contend, 
defend, or maintain the cause of another ; 
and is not to be confounded with the 
adjective 14, great, ὅτο. 

21, 22. yt. For the reflexive signi- 
fication of Niphal, see Gesen, Lehrgeb. 
p. 238. The means which Jehovah 
employed for the purpose of revealing 
himself to the Egyptians, appear to 
have been the residence of so many 
Jews among them, the severe national 
calamities to which they were sub- 
jected, and the deliverances which he 
wrought for them. The conversion of 
multitudes to the Jewish faith, under 
the Ptolemies, in a great measure 
paved the way for the introduction of 
the gospel into Egypt; and, in part, 
accounts for its very rapid and exten- 
sive spread in that country.—In 12 
mI) ΤΠ} there is an ellipsis of 3 before 
the nouns. Exod. x. 26, which Ge- 
senius adduces to prove that 72Y signi- 
fies 4o offer, evinces, on the contrary, 
that it is used in the acceptation of 
serving ΟΥ̓ worshipping.*}3—F2D. <A finite 
verb repeated in the infin. indicates 
the continuation of the action. See 1 
Sam. vi. 12; 1 Kings xx. 37. Gesen. 
Lehrgeb. p. 779. The doctrine here 
taught is, that when God has purposes 
of mercy towards a sinful people, he 
will continue to visit them with cala- 
mities till they are humbled, and thus 


brought into a fit state for appreciat- 
ing the value of his mercies. Comp, 
Job v. 17—19; Hos. vy. 15, yi. 1, 2; 
Isa. lvii, 15—19. 

23. By Wx, in this and the follow- 
ing verse, is not meant Assyria Proper, 
ἢ. 6. the countries on the east of the 
Tigris, nor Babylonia, but Syria, which 
is only an abridgement of the former 
name, and specifically that country, as 
forming the kingdom of the Seleucid, 
from B.c. 245 to B.c. 64; and after- 
wards a proconsular Roman province. 
Subsequent to the time of Alexander 
a freer intercourse obtained between 
the Egyptians, and the countries to- 
wards the Euphrates ; and the Jews 
being transported thither as colonists, 
as for instance by Seleucus Nicanor, 
Joseph. Antiq. lib. xvi. cap. 10. § 8, 
and afterwards forming a great part of 
the population of Antioch, the capital 
of Syria, the knowledge of the true 
God was widely propagated in those 
regions, and many proselytes were 
made to the Jewish faith. About a 
century before the birth of Christ, 
that faith was embraced by the kings 
of the Homerite Arabians, and, some- 
what later, by the princes of Adiabene. 
So great was the abandonment of pa- 
ganism at Damascus, that the great 
proportion of the female sex were 
converts toJudaism. Giesler’s Church 
Hist. vol. i. p. 31. AUNTY OPIS" 730), 
Hitzig, after some others, strangely 
renders, “but the Egyptians shall be 
in servitude to the Assyrians ;” since 
it is clear from the whole scope of the 
passage, as well as from the use of 729 


CHAP. ΧΧ.] 


ISATAH. 


181 


And the Egyptians shall worship with the Assyrians. 


24 


In that day shall Israel be the third 


In reference to Egypt and Assyria ; 
A blessing in the midst of the earth. 


25 


Whom Jehovah of Hosts shall bless, saying, 
Blessed be Egypt, my people, 


And Assyria, the work of my hands, 


And Israel, mine inheritance. 


in a religious sense, ver. 21, it is the 
worship and service of Jehovah that 
is meant. For the use of nx, in the 
signification of with, in company with, 
see Gesen. Heb. Lex. nx, ii. 2. 

24, 25. These verses have a special 
reference to the times of the Hasmo- 
nean dynasty, which lasted one hun- 
dred and twenty-six years. During 
this period most of the remarkable 
occurrences took place in Egypt and 
Syria which have been noticed above ; 
and it was in Palestine, Egypt, and 
Syria, that the earliest and most 
flourishing Christian churches were 
planted. The former were, by the 
providence of God, rendered eminently 


subservient to the accomplishment 
of the prediction. In OS mM 
mu is a blending of the genders: 
the mas. being first used on account 
of the name ‘xi%™ having been that of 
the patriarch Jacob; but afterwards 
the fem. inasmuch as it was that of 
the nation. See on chap. xv. 3. The ἢ 
in 1923 is to be taken collectively in re- 
ference to Israel, Egypt, and Syria, 
mentioned in the preceding verse. 
While the two latter are recognised in 
terms which are elsewhere appropri- 
ated to*the Hebrews, the latter are 
still distinguished as ¢he peculiar pos- 
session of Jehovah. Salvation was of 
the Jews. 


CHAPTER XX. 


This brief section of the, book belongs to a period somewhere between the 
seventh and fourteenth year of Hezekiah, when the Assyrians were ad- 


vancing for the first time to attack the Egyptians and Ethiopians. 


Sargon 


is, indeed, supposed by many to be only another name for Sennacherib, who, 
according to Jerome, had not fewer than seven names ; and they think that 
the circumstances here described took place in connexion with the expedi- 
tion sent by that monarch against Jerusalem ; but the event of his expedi- 


tion presents an insuperable objection to this hypothesis. 


It cannot be 


denied that Tartan is said to have been sent by Sennacherib against Jerusa- 
lem, 2 Kings xviii. 17; see on Isa. xxxvi. 1,2. Yet it is quite possible that 
he may have been employed on that occasion, in consequence of the success 
of a former expedition against Egypt. I agree, therefore, with Gesenius, 


Z 


182 ISATATL. [CHAP. XX. 


Rosenmiller, Maurer, and Hitzig, in the opinion that Sargon occupied the 
Assyrian throne during a short period between the reigns of Shalmaneser 
and Sennacherib, and that Tartan served as general under both kings. 
The name Sargon, written Surkan, has recently been discovered on the 
Assyrian monument at Khorasabad, and is the name of the king who built 
the palace there. 

As usual, the Jews, hearing of the approach of the Assyrian army, cherished 
the hope that it would be met and vanquished by the Egyptians. To con- 
vince them of the vanity of such hope, Isaiah is commissioned to exhibit, by 
striking symbolical actions, the disastrous fate of those in whom they 
trusted, 1—4; and to announce the shame and consternation which the dis- 
appointment would occasion, 5, 6. 


1 In the year in which Tartan came to Ashdod, (when Sargon the 
king of Assyria sent him,) and fought against Ashdod and took 
2 it; at that time Jehovah spake by Isaiah the son of Amoz, 


saying: Go and loose the sackcloth from thy loins, and take 
the shoes off thy feet; and he did so, walking naked and bare- 


1. Wx, LXX.”Acoros, Ashdod, was 
one of the five principal cities of the 
Philistines, Josh. xiii. 3; 1 Sam. vi. 
17; the seat of the worship of Dagon, 
1 Sam. v. 5; and from its being 
strongly fortified, and lying near the 
frontiers of Egypt, was reckoned one 
of the keys to that country on the 
north. It was situated a little inland 
from the coast, about fifty miles north 
of Gaza, and at the same distance to 
the west of Jerusalem. It was fre- 
quently attacked, and sustained a siege 
on the part of Psammetichus which 
lasted twenty-nine years—the longest 
recorded on the page of history. It 
is at present an inconsiderable village, 


known by the name of Cyd] , Lsdud. 

2. T3 denotes here, as usual, instru- 
mentality, and is not to be rendered, 
coram, in conspectu, as Gesenius and 


others propose. ων ooh ω"» of the 


Koran, Sur. ii. 256, which has been 
adduced in illustration, is aside from 
the point. The communication was, 
indeed, in the first instance made to 
Isaiah, LXX. πρὸς ‘Hoaiay: but the 
phrase has relation to the whole chap- 
ter, and not merely to the command 


contained in this verse.—From a com- 
parison of this passage with 2 Kings 
1.8; Zech. xiii. 4; and Matt. i. 4; 
it appears that the Hebrew prophets 
wore a mantle, or cloak, of hair-cloth, 
as a badge of office, most probably 
designed to indicate indifference to 
worldly refinement and indulgence ; 
and there is every reason to suppose 
that Isaiah was thus arrayed, in con- 
formity with such custom, and not in 
token of any particular mourning.—— 
ony, zaked. Some interpreters, both 
Jewish and Christian, taking this term 
in its strictest acceptation, suppose 
that the scene must have been merely 
allegorical, or, that it was presented 
in prophetié vision, and that no real 
actions on the part of the prophet 
are described ; but such a construction 
obviously does violence to the narra- 
tive ; since, if he had not acted in the 
manner enjoined, he could not have 
been “a sign and a wonder” to his 
countrymen. It is, therefore, to be 
understood literally, to the extent 
which the context requires, viz. with- 
out the mantle of sackcloth, &c. which 
the prophet usually wore. That the 
Hebrews and other nations were ac- 
customed to speak of persons‘as naked 


CHAP. XX.] 


3 foot. 


ISATAH. 


183 


And Jehovah said, As my servant Isaiah walketh naked 


and. barefoot three years, a sign and a type in reference to Egypt 
4 and Cush; so shall the king of Assyria lead the captives of 
Egypt and the exiles of Cush, young men and old, naked and 


5 barefoot, with their seat uncovered, the shame of Egypt. 


And 


they shall be afraid and ashamed of Cush their expectation, and 


6 of Egypt their boast. 


And the inhabitants of this coast shall 


say in that day: Behold! thus it is with our expectation to 
which we have fled for help, that we might be delivered from 
the king of Assyria: How then shall we escape ? 


when only partially disrobed, see 1 
Sam. xix. 24; 2 Sam. vi. 20 ; John xxi. 
7; Cicero ad Fam. x. 32; Sueton. 
Nero. li.; Seneca de Venef. v. 13; 
Ailian, V. ἘΠ. 6, 11. 13, 37. At the 
same time, the language employed in 
ver. 4 shews that the prophet must 
have been denuded to the utmost ex- 
tent which public decency allowed.— 
Instead of 722, twenty-nine MSS., 
five others originally, some of the 


earliest and best editions, the LXX., 


Arab., Syr., and Vulg., read 77222 in 
the plural. 

3. Every attempt which has been 
made to shew that Isaiah did not ap- 
pear in this symbolical state for the 
space of three years has proved abor- 
tive—being contradictory of the plain 
statement of the text. 1t is not, how- 
ever, necessary to suppose that he 
went about every day in this state, but 
that when he did appear in public he 
was thus undressed. The period spe- 
cified was that which was to elapse 
before the actual capture of the 
Egyptians. During the whole of that 
time the Jews had their attention pro- 
phetically directed to the certainty of 
the event. The Hebrew accentuation, 
the various reading of the LXX., and 
the conjecture of Lowth, that om v7, 
three days, may originally have been in 
the text, are to be traced to a desire 
to relieve it of what, after all, is no 
serious difficulty. For the meaning 
of mpi nix, see chap vili. 17, 18; and 
comp. Jer. xliii. 8, 9; Ezek, xii. 3—7, 
11, xxiv. 17, 22—24. 

4, Ancient history is silent respect- 
ing the victories gained by the Assyrians 


on this occasion ; but it is doubtless 
the same event referred to, Nahum 11]. 8 
—10, when No-Ammon, or Thebes, 
the residence of the Ethiopian kings 
of Egypt, was taken, and its inhabit- 
ants carried into captivity. The close 
connexion between Egypt and Ethio- 
pia at this time, shews that the African 
and not the Arabian Cush is meant.— 
nw pw, is generally considered to bean 
antiquated plural construct, as 7H, 
Gen. xlix. 26, 2x0 777), Isa. xvi. 4, the 
Tzere having been changed into Patach, 
for the sake of euphony. Several co- 
dices, however, read ‘pT. On the 
royal tombs at Thebes are representa- 
tions of captives led away in triumph, 
either ina state of complete nudity, 
or with a small scarf suspended round 
their loins, and hanging down in front. 

5, ὉΞῸ and ΓΊΝΕΙ are used for the 
object of expectation and boasting,—an 
idiom very common in Scripture. 

6. °8, which signifies isle, sea-coast, 
maritime country, is here to be taken in 
a more extended acceptation, as com- 
prehending the whole of Palestine,— 
so called from its bordering on the 
Mediterranean. It is derived from 


uss! , se recepit commorandi vel quiescendt 
ergo, diversatus fuit: IV. in hospitium 
recepit. conte, mansio, sedes commora- 


tionis. The only hope of the inhabit- 
ants of Palestine being frustrated by 
the reduction of Egypt, they had no 
power to which they might apply for 
defence against the returning army of 
the Assyrians, x, after 272), is 
emphatic. How then shall we escape? 


184 ISATAH. [CHAP. XXI. 


CHAPTER XXI. 1—10. 


THE SENTENCE OF THE DESERT OF THE SEA. 


This chapter contains three prophetic oracles, of which the first respects the 
conquest of Babylon by the Medes and Persians, and occupies the first ten 
verses. It is full of scenic representation, and is justly characterised by 
Lowth as singular for its brevity and force ; for the variety and rapidity of 
the movements ; and for the strength and energy of colouring with which 
the action and event are painted. Under the image of a portentous storm, 
the prophet announces the approach of the army of Cyrus, calls upon the 
warriors to advance, and pathetically describes the consternation which their 
unexpected attack would produce, 1—4. The king of Babylon and his 
princes are then described as indulging in festive security ; but, by a sudden 
transition, the Persians are summoned to arms, 5. The advance of the 
enemy, and the issue of the attack, are then appropriately depicted, 6—9 ; 
and the vision closes with an animated address to the Jewish captives, calling 


their attention to what was designed to effect their deliverance, 10. 


1 As hurricanes sweeping through the south, 


It cometh from the desert, 
From the terrible land. 


1. Ὁ 7379, the Desert of the Sea, a 
very appropriate designation of the 
country about Babylon, especially to- 
wards the south, which was one un- 
broken extensive plain, consisting 
either of sterile sandy regions, or of 
open fields of pasturage for flocks. 
Previous to the construction of dams 
by Semiramis, the periodical inunda- 
tion of the Euphrates caused the 
whole country to assume the appear- 
ance of a vast sheet of water, on 
which account it was called a sea. 
Herod. i. 184. Abydenus SayS @X- 
pr essly : : λέγεται δὲ πάντα μὲν ἐξ a ἀρχῆς 
ὕδωρ εἶναι, ΘΑΛΑΣΣΑΝ καλεομένην. 
Euseb. Preep. Evang. ix. 41, p. 457, ed. 
Paris, 1628. Comp. Jer. li. 13, 86. It 
is, however, not impossible that there 
may bea reference to the artificial sea, 
or lake, to the west of Babylon, forty 
square miles in size, into which the 
water of the Euphrates was turned, 
and kept, as in a common reservoir, 


for the purpose of irrigating the lands 
in the vicinity—The great Arabian 
desert lying to the south both of 
Babylon and Palestine, the most de- 
structive storms come from that direc- 
tion. They sweep along with tremen- 
dous fury, carrying tents into the air, 
and devastating whatever cannot resist 
their violence. They are properly 
called M50, sweepers, from FPO, to carry 


entirely away, destroy; Arab. —slw, 


Conj. viii. perire fecit, exterminavit. 
Comp. Job 1. 19, xxxvii. 9; Zech. ix. 
14.—The ? in Riad marks the gerund. 
—The nomin. to 83, is the Medo- 
Persian army, understood, though not 
expressed. It is said to come from 
the desert, i.e. the vast region lying to 
the north and east of Babylon, and 
which is called το yx, a ¢errible land, 
because it was mostly uncultivated, 
and the residence of wild beasts. 
Comp. Deut. i. 19. 


CHAP. ΧΧΙ.] 


ISATAH. 


185 


2 A grievous vision was shewn to me, 
The plunderer plundering, and the destroyer destroying ; 


Go up, O Elam! 


Besiege, O Media ! 


All sighing I have made to cease. 

3 Therefore my loins are full of writhing ; 
Pangs have seized me, as the pangs of a woman in labour: 
I am convulsed, I cannot hear ; 


I am troubled, I cannot see. 
4 My heart is bewildered, 


Horror hath suddenly seized me; 


2. The fem. nu7 is construed with 
an adjective and verb in the mas. on 
account of the tremendous character 
of the subject to which it refers.—723 
not only signifies ¢o act perfidiously, but 
also, to commit violence, pillage, spotl, 


&e.; LXX, ἀθετεῖ: Syr. FQ—>4, perverse 


egit, injuriam intulit. "Targ. DN, to 
oppress, pluader. Comp. Hab. ii. 5. 
Lowth’s change of the Ben. into Pah. 
participles is critically unwarranted, 
and violates the claims of the con- 
nexion.—The enemy is seen by the 
prophet, engaged in the work of de- 
struction, to effect which he is en- 
couraged by an express command 
from Jehovah; and the result is 
abruptly, but expressively, announced, 
—the termination of the sufferings 
and sorrows of those whom Babylon 
had oppressed. According to the 
Masoretes, the 7 in 77728 is Raple, i.e. 
it is to be pronounced soft, without 
the Mappik, which is found in several 
MSS. and printed editions, and is, 
therefore, not to be regarded as 
a pronominal suffix. It is, indeed, 
not unusual to introduce an implied 
reference, especially in animated and 
abrupt style ; but it seems preferable 
to consider the 7 as paragogic and 
emphatic, and so expressing still 
more forcibly the extent of the sigh- 
ing which Babylon had occasioned, 
but which was now to cease. See 
Ps. iii. 3. Thus Jarchi and Rosen- 
miller. 1 

3, 4. In these verses the prophet 
personifies Babylon, and represents 
her as giving expression to extreme 
agitation and terror, occasioned by the 


unexpected appearance of the enemy. 
mn is intensive, and signifies great 
writhing, or writhing pain, from 7, to 
twist, writhe. Comp. WW, 17, &e.—d 
in pdt and Nin expresses negation.— 
MOT Hr, lit. the twilight of my pleasure ; 
but 4%, which signifies either the 
evening or the morning twilight, is 
also used for the darkness of night 
that intervenes between them. See 
chap. v. 11, lix. 10. What the prophet 
means is the night which the Babylo- 
nians had devoted to pleasure, when 
Belshazzar made a great feast to a 
thousand of his nobles, and drank 
wine out of the sacred cups which 
had been taken from the temple at 
Jerusalem, Dan. v. Of the festival 
celebrated on this occasion, express 
mention is made by Herodotus, lib. 1, 
191: ἀλλὰ τυχεῖν σφὶ ἐοῦσαν ὁρτήν, 
χορεύειν τε τοῦτον τὸν χρόνον, καὶ ἐν 
εὐπαθείησι εἶναι, ἐς ὁ δὴ καὶ τὸ κάρτα 
ἐπύθοντο : “ but they happened to be cele- 
brating a festival, and were dancing 
and indulging in pleasure, when they 
learned what had happened.” And 
Xenophon states in his Cyropeedia, 
vii. 7: ‘O δὲ Κῦρος, ἐπειδὴ ἑορτὴν τοι- 
αὕτην ἐν Βαβυλώνι ἤκουσεν εἶναι, ἐν ἡ 
πάντες Βαβυλώνιοι ὅλην τὴν νύκτα πί- 
νουσι καὶ κωμάζουσιν : that “ Cyrus, 
when he heard that they were celebrating 
a festival at Babylon, in which all the 
Babylonians drank and revelled the 
whole night,” proceeded to take mea- 
sures for the immediate capture of 
the city—nw is used impersonally, 
and is equivalent to the substantive 
verb ™, followed by ?.—Before 71, 
subaud. 72, repeated from the preced- 
ing clause. Comp. Dan..v. 6, 9. 


186 


The night of my pleasure 


Is to me become one of terror. 


The table is arranged ; 
The watch is set ; 


They eat, they drink :— 


or 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP, XXI. 


Arise, ye princes; anoint the shield. 
6 For thus hath the Lord said to me: 


Go, station a watchman ; 


What he seeth, let him declare. 
7 And he saw troops of horse by pairs, 


5. PY, ΤΌΣ, Ax, and tim, are his- 
torical Infinitives, and vividly portray 
the security and avidity with which 
the Babylonians were enjoying the 
feast. The position of ΠΈΣ ΠῈΣ be- 
tween JT8T FY and nw Ax is beauti- 
fully select. When the tables had all 
been prepared, and the king and his 
guests were about to sit down to the 
banquet, the precaution was taken to 
see that the guards were placed at 
their posts. The coincidence between 
this circumstance, noticed by Isaiah, 
and the words addressed to Cyrus by 
those who were around Gobrias, one 
of his generals, is also remarkable,— 
ὡς ἐν κώμῳ δοκεῖ yap ἡ πόλις πᾶσα εἶναι 
τῇδε τῇ νυκτί. φυλακῇ μέντοι πρὸ 
τῶν πυλῶν ἐντευξόμεθα' ἔστι γὰρ 
ἀεὶ τεταγμένη : “the city seems to- 
night to be in a general revel, but we 
shall meet with a guard at the gates, Sor 
there ts always one set there.” Cyropeed. 
ut sup. Other interpretations of 
mesimpz have been attempted, but 
have failed. See Gesenius and Hitzig. 
The words are not found in the LXX. 
The Hexap. has, after an asterisk, 
σκόπευσον τὴν σκοπιάν, but there is 
no corresponding translation in the 
Hexap. Syriac. The Peshito Syr., 
Targ., and Vulg., render according to 
the usual signification of watching, 
looking out.—According to Gesenius, 
the last clause of the verse contains a 
call from the watch to the princes of 
Babylon to rise from the tables at 
which they were feasting, and hasten 
to the defence of the city; but the 
words are more probably addressed in 
vision by the prophet to the com- 
manders of the Medes and Persians, 


calling upon them to seize the faveur- 
able moment of attack. Comp. Jer. 
li. 11, 12; and the words of Cyrus: 
ἄγετε, λαμβάνετε ὅπλα. The 72, shield, 
was the chief defence of the ancient 
warrior. In length it was about half 
his height, and generally double its 
own breadth. It was most commonly 
covered with bull’s hide, (hence ἀσπί- 
das βοείας, Iliad, v. 452,) having the 
hair outwards, sometimesstrengthened 
by one or more rims of metal, and 
studded with nails or metal pins. 
Sometimes it was suspended by a 
thong upon the side, and sometimes 
held by a handle. Wilkinson’s An- 
cient Egyptians, vol. i. p. 298. 10 was 
customary to smear the shields over 
with oil, to render them smooth, so 
that the weapons of the enemy might 
slide off them, and also to prevent 
them from being injured by rain. 
This was done before engaging in 
battle, which accounts for the com- 
mand on the present occasion. Comp. 
2 Sam. i. 21. 

6. Isaiah is here ordered to do, 
what would naturally be done under 
such circumstances by one anxious to 
know the result. The whole is trans- 
acted in vision. A watchman is 
stationed ; the army of Cyrus is pre- 
sented to his view ; he gives the alarm 
by describing its appearance; and 
finally announces the fall of Babylon, 
ver. 7—9. 

7. 22), and 123, as well as Won and 723, 
are here nouns of multitude. As 27 
also signifies @ chariot, most interpre- 
ters so render it in the present instance, 
and some, with Michaelis, suppose 
the war-chariots, armed with scythes, 


CHAP. XXI.]| 


ISATAT. 


187 


Troops of asses, troops of camels ; 
And listened with the utmost attention. 


to be meant, which were first intro- 
duced among the Persians by Cyrus. 
Since, however, it does not appear that 
asses and camels were employed in 
the East to draw chariots, or waggons 
of any description, the term cannot be 
so taken, at least in the connexion in 
which it here stands with these 
animals; and it is scarcely to be ima- 
gined that it would be used in such 
close proximity, in two different ac- 
ceptations. 12, the verb from which 


it is derived, like the Arab. as A 


signifies fo ride, either on an animal or 
in a vehicle, so that the noun may 
equally denote riders, and the animals 
on, or the vehicles in, which they rode. 
Comp. 2 Sam. viii. 4, x. 18. It must 
here be understood as signifying troops 
riding on horses,—O'X}2 signifies both 
horsemen and horses, especially such as 
were used for riding: the parallel use 
of camels and asses shews that the 
word is to be taken in the latter sense. 
122 properly denotes a yoke, from 122, 
lo bind, fasten; but as the yoke was 
employed for the purpose of binding 
two animals together, it easily came to 
signify a couple of animals thus 
bound, and then ἃ pair or couple in- 
definitely, without reference to the 
primary signification of the term. 
The prophet employs it to describe 
the Persian cavalry advancing iz double 
ranks :—a circumstance specially no- 
ticed by Xenophon: ‘Qs δὲ τὸ τοῦ 
ποταμοῦ οὕτως ἐπορσύνετο, παρηγγύησεν 
ὁ Κῦρος, Πέρσαις χιλιάρχοις καὶ πεζῶν 
καὶ ἱππέων, EIS ΔΥΌ ἄγοντας τὴν χι- 
λιοστὺν παρεῖναι πρὸς αὐτόν, k.T.d. 
Cyropeed. vii. ὅ, 8. That Cyrus should 
have a strong body of hcrsemen might 
be anticipated, from the use of cavalry 
by the Egyptians and other nations of 
antiquity ; but it would seem that 
they were first used by the Persians, 
in his wars in Western Asia. How 
strange soever it may appear, at first 
sight, to us westerns, that,asses should 
be employed in offensive warfare, it is 
certain that the inhabitants of Cara- 
mania, a province of Persia, thus used 
them: Χρῶνται δ᾽ ὄνοις οἱ πολλοὶ καὶ 


πρὸς πόλεμον, σπάνει τῶν ἵππων. ὄνον 
τε θύουσι τῷ “Apet, ὅνπερ σέβονται 
θεῶν μόνον, καί εἰσι πολεμισταί. “Even 
in war they mostly use asses, owing 
to the lack of horses; and they also 
offer them in sacrifice to Mars, whom 
alone of all the gods they worship ; 
being a most warlike people.” Strabo, 
lib. xv. cap. 2. These animals were 
not only useful in conveying the 
soldiers forward to the point where 
they gave battle to the enemy on foot, 
but were also employed for the pur- 
pose of scaring his horses. Thus 
Herodotus relates, that, in the expedi- 
tion of Darius against the Scythians, 
the insolence of the asses so terrified 
the Scythian horses, that they were 
panic-struck. by their braying, and, 
pricking their ears, turned about ; 
having never before heard the sound, 
or seen the form of these animals—a 
circumstance which, in some degree, 
affected the fortune of the war, lib. iv. 
cap. 29. According to Xenophon, a 
similar stratagem was used by Cyrus 
with the camels, in the decisive battle 
which he gained against Creesus, which 
proves that he also had them in his 
army, conformably to the prediction 
in the text. Cyropzed. vii. 1, § 14, 22. 
Since, however, it was anciently cus- 
tomary for the Bactrians, Parthians, 
Africans, and other nations of the 
East, to attack the enemy on the 
backs of camels or dromedaries, as it 
has been since, and is at this day in 
Arabia, there is reason to believe that 
the like formed part of the military 
operations of Cyrus in his war with 
the Babylonians. See Diod. Sic. 1]. 
54, 111. 44; Liv. xxxvii. 40; Strabo, xvi. 
3; Herod. vii. 86; Pollux, x. 8; Hero- 
dian, iv.15; Gesenius, iz loc. ; Michaelis, 
Laws of Moses, vol. ii. p. 499. 

In the present case, as in number- 
less others, by abandoning the literal 
interpretation for one that is sym- 
bolical and purely imaginary, the 
evidence which the passage affords in 
support of the truth of Scripture is 
entirely lost. Regarding ΘΒ as de- 
noting horsemen, Estius, Tirinus, Sane- 
tius, Menochius, Prebend. Lowth, and 


188 


8 And he cried out like a lion: 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP, XXI. 


On the watch-tower I stood, my lord! 


Continually by day ; 


And at my post of observation, 


I was stationed whole nights. 


9 And behold! this came: 


Troops of men, horse by pairs. 


And he further said : 
Babylon is fallen, is fallen ! 


And all the graven images of her gods he hath smashed to the 


ground ! 


10 O my threshing, and the corn of my floor! 


others, suppose the two to be sym- 
bolical of Cyrus and Darius; while 
some are of opinion that the ass and 
the camel are symbolical of the Medes 
and Persians ! 

8. Want of attention to the usage 
of the language has led many to 
interpret ™x, @ lion, of Darius; but 
there is obviously an ellipsis of 3, as, 
like, before the word, as “5%, for BY3, 
Ps. xi. 1; 1, for m3, Isa. xxii. 23; 
ven, for ὝΣΠΞ, 11, 12, ef freg. Comp. 
Rey. x. 8. Lowth’s conjecture, that 
we should read 1819, which is adopted 
by Michaelis, Dathe, and Déderlein, 
is altogether gratuitous—The punc- 
tists, supposing Jehovah to be ad- 
dressed by the watchman, read ‘21, 
but as, according to ver. 6, the watch- 
man was placed at his post by Isaiah, 
the word should be pointed ‘x, and 
rendered sir, or my lord, as in our com- 
mon version. 

9. In the phrase 82 T1737 seems to 
be couched the sudden and unexpected 
approach of the Persian army—a cir- 
cumstance specially noticed by Hero- 
dotus: viv δὲ ἐξ ἀπροσδοκήτου opi 
παρέστησαν οἱ Πέρσαι; “ But the Per- 
sians came upon them quite wnez- 
pectedly,” lib. i. 191. Here wx, for 
Dw, which was omitted ver. 7, is 
supplied, and the other two particulars 
there mentioned are left out, being 
understood.—2y, lit. to axswer, is used 
idiomatically to express the continu- 
ance or prosecution of the discourse. 
Comp. Gen. xviii. 27, and ἀποκρίνομαι, 
in the Hellenistic Greek of the N. T., 
Matt. xi. 25, xxii. 1; only, in the pre- 


sent instance, there is, as it were, a 
perceptible pause on the part of the 
watchman, before proceeding to an- 
nounce the result of the hostile ap- 
proach of Cyrus—the destruction of 
Babylon. The repetition 75) 753 
expresses the strong impression which 
the fall of that great city had pro- 
duced on the mind of the speaker, and 
gives emphasis to the declaration. 
Comp. Rev. xviii. 2, where the same 
formula is employed in application to 
spiritual Babylon.—The concluding 
clause of the verse contains another 
of those prophetic intimations which 
receive their confirmation from profane 
history, though ofttimes in an appa- 
rently quite incidental manner. Hero- 
dotus expressly states, lib. i. 131, that 
ἀγάλματα μὲν καὶ νηοὺς καὶ βωμοὺς οὐκ 
ἐν νόμῳ ποιευμένους ἱδρύεσθαι, ἀλλὰ καὶ 
τοῖσι ποιεῦσι μωρίην ἐπιφέρουσι; “The 
Persians deem it unlawful to form 
images, or construct temples and 
altars, and charge those with stupidity 
who do so.” They would, therefore, 
naturally break them in pieces, when- 
ever they fell in their way. The 
nomin. to 130 is Cyrus or his army 
understood. Followed by yw? the 
verb is a vor pregnans; and the full 
force of the phrase is, to break in 
pieces while levelling with the ground. 
The LXX., Arab., Syr., Targ. and 
Vulg., appear to have read 13%, and De 
Rossi’s Cod. 985, originally read 7303; 
but both readings have sprung from 
want of attention to the proper nomi- 
native-—Comp. Jer. 1. 2, li. 47, 52. 

10. The words 9) ‘M72 have 


CHAP. XXI.] 


What I have heard from Jehovah 


I have declared to you. 


been variously interpreted, according 
to the different views which have been 
taken of the person speaking, and of 
those respecting whom they are spoken. 
The most natural construction is that 
which assigns them to the prophet, 
and regards them as addressed to his 
countrymen who should be in Babylon 
at the time of the Persian conquest, 
They had been ¢hreshed, i.e. trodden 
upon and oppressed by their enemies, 
till, by the blessing of God, their 
idolatrous practices had been separated 
from them, and they lay as clean grain 
upon the threshing-floor, ready to be 
removed into the garner. The pro- 
phet calls them Ais, identifying him- 
self with them as his people. 19, 


VERSES 


ISAIAH. 


189 
of Hosts, the God of Israel, 


a threshing, ov that which has been 
threshed, from 11, Arab. plo, cal- 
cavit pedibus terram, to tread out grain, 
trample upon, crush enemies, captives, ὅζο. 


1, a smooth or level area on a rising 
ground, or in a field, where grain is 


trodden out; Arab. wy? to make 


smooth ΟΥ̓ level. J133, lit. the son of my 
floor, but used idiomatically for the 
grain which was upon it. Comp. 
HO, sparks, Job v. 7; MTB, the 
arrow, chap. xli. 20, and the Arab. 


(So ων» aurora; οὐκ os eiahie 
sel ων» luna ; \ SI oth Po 


11, 12. 


THE SENTENCE OF DUMAH. 


11 Onze called to me from Seir: 


Watchman! what of the night ? 
Watchman! what of the night? 


12 The watchman said: 


11, 12. These two verses contain a 
prophecy concerning the inhabitants 
of Dumah, which, from its abrupt in- 
troduction, its brevity, and its enigma- 
tical character, is somewhat difficult of 
interpretation. From 2, Dummh, oc- 
curring Gen. xxv. 14, and 1 Chron. i. 
30, as the name of one of the descend- 
ants of Ishmael, in connexion with 
Teman and other Arabian names, it is 
most probable that, in this place, we 
are to understand by the term, the 


Δουμαίθα of Ptolemy, οὐαὶ keosd, 


the Rocky Dumah, or Sell] Koy, 


Syrian Dumuah, so called from its being 
situated on the confines of Arabia 
Petraa and the Syrian desert. Thus 
Michaelis, Déderlein, Hensler, Ge- 
senius, Hitzig, Maurer. On the other 


hand, Schmidius, Vitringa, Lowth, 
Koppe, Dathe, Rosenmiiller, Booth- 
royd, and Jenour, following the ’Idov- 
pata of the LXX., consider it to be 
merely an abbreviation of DYN, H/om. 
The circumstance that the voice is 
said to come Vy, from Sei, cannot 
strictly be adduced in favour of the 
latter interpretation ; since, if we sup- 
pose the prophet to have been in 
Jerusalem, it must have reached him 
from Seir—the north-east mountains 
of that country stretching between 
Dumah and Judea. The period to 
which the prophecy refers seems to 
be that during which the Jews were 
captives in Babylon. Respecting this 
period, metaphorically called the night, 
on account of its calamities, (see chap, 
xlv. 7 ; Joel ii. 2; Amos v. 18,) the in- 
habitants of Dumah scoffingly inquire, 


AA 


190 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. ΧΧΙ. 


Morning cometh, and also night; 


If ye will inquire, inquire ; 
Turn, come. 


how far it is advanced. And, to give 
greater pointedness to the taunt, the 
inquiry is repeated. The inspired 
reply is, that morning, i. e. the dawn of 
joy and prosperity (see Job xi. 17) is 
approaching to the Jews, but that 
there is also a night at hand, or a sea- 
son of calamity for their enemies. 
The prophet then tells them, that, if 
they would really know what was in 
the Divine mind, they must repent, 
and come in the exercise of an humble 
and teachable disposition. Comp. Job. 
Xxil, 21.—xnx, and 73, are Aramaic, 
or imitations of it. The former verb 


VERSES 


is otherwise used in Heb. with 7 for 
its third radical, which a great many 
MSS., and the Complut. Bible, exhibit 
in this place; the latter occurs only 
once besides, Obad. ver. 6, in the sense 
of inquiring. Ὑ is used in its meta- 
phorical sense of turning to God, repent- 
ing, being converted, &c. like the Arab. 


Wb, δῦ, conver sid, Ls pententia ; 


Syr. and Chald. 562, 37; Rab- 


bin. WW, repentance ; and not adver- 
bially, to qualify the following verb, 
as Hitzig maintains, 


13—17. 


THE SENTENCE OF ARABIA, 


From Dumah, on the very confines, the prophet proceeds to deliver an oracle 
respecting the condition to which the Arabians in general should be reduced 


within a year after its publication. 


Instead of traversing the country as 


usual, and pitching their tents at the ordinary stations, or as might best 
suit their convenience, the mercantile caravans should be obliged to betake 
themselves to the thickets, in order to escape from the sword of the enemy. 
To what invasion of Arabia reference is made cannot be determined ; but, as 
it must have taken place in the time of Isaiah, it cannot be that by Nebu- 
chadnezzar, predicted by Jeremiah, chap. xlix. 23—33; except we were to 
suppose that some definite numeral had been dropped out of the text before 
m0, Lowth thinks it may have happened in connexion with Sennacherib’s 
invasion of Judea, about the fourteenth year of Hezekiah. 


13 In the thickets of Arabia shall ye lodge, 


Ye caravans of Dedanites ! 


13. Lowth deems the title, 43 NwD, 
of doubtful authority, partly because 
it is wanting in many MSS. of the 
LXX., and partly because of what he 
calls the singularity of the phrase- 
ology. The former circumstance is of 
little moment, especially as the Greek 
MSS. in which it is found are sup- 


ported by Aq., Symm., and Theod. 
And, as it respects the construction, 
though the two identical nouns no. 
where else occur with the preposition 
3 intervening, yet instances of nouns 
thus construed are by no means un- 
common. Comp. 3732 7, 2 Sam. i. 
22; pova ay, Ps, lxxxiv. 7; VEPpa now, 


CHAP. XXI.| 


14 


ISAIAH. 


191 


Bring forward water to the thirsty ; 


Ye inhabitants of the land of Tema, 
Anticipate with his bread the fugitive. 


15 


Isa. ix. 2; and 2a wa, immediately 
following in the verse itself, which in 
all probability was prominent in the 
mind of Isaiah, when he penned the 


title. See also lvi. 9. any, oa mad 


Arabia, generally speaking, includes 
the whole tract of country, extending 
from Palestine to the straits of Babel- 
mandel, and from the Red Sea to the 
Euphrates, and usually divided into 
Deserta, Petrza, and Felix ; but in this 
passage, as most frequently in Scrip- 
ture, the name more immediately ap- 
plies to Arabia Deserta, or the northern, 
being that with which the Hebrews 
were most familiar. It is peopled by 


Bedoweens, «9.» i. 6. inhabitants of 


the desert, who have no fixed habita- 
tions, but live in tents, (σκηνῖται, 
Strabo, xvi. 3; Diod. Sic. ii. 54,) and 
move from place to place, according as 
they require pasturage for their flocks. 
This mode of life they have led from 
the most ancient times; as, indeed, 
they retain unaltered most of the 
‘patriarchal manners and customs. 
Through this desert lay the great 
route from the Elanitic and Persian 
gulfs on the south to Damascus, Tyre, 
and Sidon on the north, connecting 
the commerce of the Indian seas with 
that of the Mediterranean. It still 
forms that of the caravans from 
Damascus to Mecca. It is to such 
caravans, here called nimMs, travelling 
compantes, that the prophet refers. 
Comp. Job vi. 19. Being stocked with 
articles of great value they would 
naturally be an object of attack by 
the enemy.—lInstead of 23, two of 
De Rossi’s MSS. read 3193, in the evening, 
but probably a correction from the 
Targ., which, with the LXX., Syr., and 
Vulg., gives this interpretation.—By 
w is not meant a forest of trees, but 
a rough or rugged part of the desert, 
containing thickets of brush-wood, 
briers, &c. which rendered hostile 
operations in a great measure imprac- 


For they flee from the swords, 


ticable. Comp. the Arab. yy locus 


salebrosus—OI11, the Dedanites, here 
mentioned, are not the descendants 
of Abraham by Keturah, Gen. xxv. 
3, who occupied a northern tract in 
Arabia, bordering on Idumea, but 
those of Raamah, specified Gen. x. 7, 


who inhabited the island we Daden, 


in the Persian Gulf, and most probably 
part of the adjacent coast of Arabia, 
and were celebrated on account of 
their trade with the Pheenicians, Ezek. 
xxvii. 15, xxxviii. 13. See Bochart 
Phaleg. lib. iv. cap 6; Michaelis, 
Spicileg. i. p. 201. It was their cara- 
vans, and not those of a tribe in the 
immediate vicinity of Tema, that 
would be attacked. 

14, non, Tema, still called by the 


Arabs, (8, Zaima, a region on the ex- 
ΩΣ 


tremity of Arabia Deserta, towards 
Syria. Job. vi.19; Jer. xxv. 23. The 
LXX. uniformly render it Θαιμάν, con- 
founding it with y2n, which lay in the 
eastern part of Idumea. It is only a 
few hours’ journey to the east of Hejeh, 
which lies on the route of the caravans 
from Damascus to Mecca. The in- 
habitants are called to perform the 
rites of hospitality towards the fugi- 
tives—a virtue for which the Arabs 
have ever been renowned.—The suff. 
in 19m) belongs to ΤΏ, the fugitive ; and 
the meaning is, Supply him with the 
food which he needs ; just as ὁ ἄρτος 
ἡμῶν, Matt. νἱ. 11, means the bread, or 
food, which our circumstances require. 
—The ancient versions read the verbs 
yn, and 277, in the Imper., and justly. 
The former is thus used Jer. xii. 9; 
and if the latter be not here used in 
Kal, it is only necessary to change 
the Hiric into Patach, and write "272, 
to make it the Imper. of Piel. 799 
is a contraction for x7. 

15. The cumulative character of 
this verse greatly heightens the effect. 
For 725, comp. 1 Sam. xxxi. 3, and the 


192 


From the drawn sword, 
And from the bent bow, 


And from the pressure of war. 
For thus said the Lord to me: 


16 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP., XXII 


In one year more, according to the years of a hireling, 


All the glory of Kedar shall be consumed. 


And the remainder of the number of bows— 


The mighty sons of Kedar shall be diminished ; 
For Jehovah, the God of Israel, hath spoken it. 


5 - . . - 
Arab. dS, molestia affecit, in angustiam 


redegit ; ὅλα » vehementia hiemis, adver- 


sitas. 

16. τῷ, Kedar, an Arabian tribe, de- 
scended from Kedar, one of the sons 
of Ishmael, Gen. xxv. 13. Comp. Ps. 
ΣΧ Os pone 1: oi; Tsay xl. pl ΤΣ; ἡ» 
Jer. ii. 10, xlix. 28, 29; Ezek. xxvii. 
21.. They are the Cedrei of Pliny, 
Hist. Nat. v. 11, and appear to have 
taken the range of the desert from the 
Red Sea as far as the Euphrates. 


Τοῦ Κηδὰρ ἀπόγονοι οὐ πόῤῥω τῆς Ba- 
βυλῶνος μέχρι τήμερον ἐσκήνωνται. 
Theod. in Ps. cxx. 5. In the present 
passage, aS in some of those just 
quoted, the name seems to be em- 
ployed, in a more extended sense, to 
denote the Arabs generally. 

17. Mp, dow, stands for NUP, Low- 
men. Corap. M72 DW, in the absolute 
state, with 3 mtervening. Thus ὝΞΡ, 
harvest, chap. xvii. 5, for 32 WR, ὦ 
reaper. In our own language, a whip 
is used for a driver; a shot, for one 
who shoots, ὅτο. 


CHAPTER XXII. 


THE SENTENCE OF THE VALLEY OF VISION. 


This oracle consists of two parts, the former of which respects the inhabitants 


of Jerusalem generally, and the latter, an individual of high rank at the 
court. Interpreters have found some difficulty in determining whether to 
refer the invasion here predicted to that of Sennacherib, or to the desolating 
one under Nebuchadnezzar. To make sure of the matter, Vitringa, Jackson, 
and others, suppose both to be meant; but without furnishing any satis- 
factory exegesis. It appears to me, after a careful examination of the 
entire section, that there is no part of it but may, without straining, be 
applied to the events which took place in Judea, and especially in the 
capital, in the fourteenth year of Hezekiah. 


The prophet describes the extreme agitation and confusion of Jerusalem 


during the siege, 1,2; the mortality arising from famine already begun, and 
the captive state of all who had fled thither for refuge, pent up within her 
walls, 2,3 ; his own feelings in prospect of the impending destruction, 4, 5; 


CHAP. XXII.] 


ISATAH. 


193 


and the preparations of the besieging army, 6,7. The defensive measures 
adopted by the inhabitants are then narrated, accompanied with a severe 
reproof for their confiding in these measures, and not in Jehovah, and their 
abandoning themselves to unholy and infidel mirth, instead of humbling 
themselves, and repenting, as became them, in such alarming circumstances, 
8—14. The remainder of the chapter is occupied with a prophecy respect- 
ing a change in the office of treasurer, which took place about the same 


period of Jewish history. 


1 Waar aileth thee now, that all belonging to thee 


Have gone up to the roofs ? 


2 Thou that wast full of commotions, 
The noisy city, the joyous city! 
Thy slain are not the slain by the sword, 
Nor such as have died in battle. 


3 All thy rulers flee together, 


1. That yrut 3, the valley of vision, 
means Jerusalem, is beyond all doubt, 
though the phrase occurs only in this 
place. Being surrounded with hills, 
and for the most part by a deep valley, 
by a branch of which it was also in- 
tersected, it might with all propriety 
be called by the latter term. See Ps. 
exxv. 2; Jer. xxi.13. The established 
‘use of 7 in reference to prophetic 
vision, and the circumstance that 
Jerusalem was the principal seat of 
divine revelation, Luke xii. 33, 34, 
prove that such is the acceptation in 
which the word is here to be taken. 
The agreement between }V7 and 79, 
Moriah —both signifying vision, is 
purely incidental—The prophet begins 
to address the inhabitants in the 
character of a stranger, or as one 
ignorant of the cause of the universal 
commotion. Comp. Luke xxiv. 17. 
Their object in assembling on the 
roofs of the houses, which were flat 
and spacious, as those of Eastern 
houses are at this day, appears to have 
been to make their observations on 
the position and strength of the 
enemy, and to concert measures of 
defence. 

2. περ «nindp., For the sake of 
emphasis, the noun is placed before 
the adjective by which it is governed. 
Gesen—The prophet contrasts the 
formerly prosperous and joyful condi- 


tion of Jerusalem with her present 
calamitous circumstances. On com- 
paring the latter distich with Lam. iv. 
9, it seems evident that by 722 we 
are to understand such of the inhabit- 
ants as had died of famine. See 2 
Chron, xxxii. 11. Either this con- 
struction must be put on the term, or 
it is to be taken figuratively in refer- 
ence to the state to which they were 
reduced by fear, which is less natural. 

3. The scene here depicted is still 
in Jerusalem; consequently, the differ- 
ent members of the verse must be 
explained accordingly. 22 is, there- 
fore, to be taken in the sense of 
fleeing from the council-chamber— 
each of the rulers repairing to his 
family, or to some particular part of 
the city where he expected safety. 


Comp. the Arab. Jj, II. and IV. dis- 


gregavit, dispersit camelos; VI. ls, 


disperst sunt, huc illuce a se tnvicem aufu- 
gerunt. Freytag. Theod. μετεκινήθησαν. 
Yet though they might thus flee, they 
were still in a state of captivity; 
though not bound or taken captive by 
the bowmen, they were confined with- 
in the walls of the city as effectually 
as if they had been prisoners of war. 
—ntp, dow, is used for archers, as 
chap. xxi. 17; and the Ὁ prefixed is to 
be taken in a negative sense, aS in 


194 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XXII. 


Without the bow, they are made prisoners ; 
All found in thee are made prisoners together, 
Even those who have fled from far. 

4 Wherefore I say, Look away from me; 


I will weep bitterly, 
(Strive not to comfort me,) 


For the desolation of the daughter of my people. 
5 For it is a day of tumult, and of treading down, and of confusion, 
From the Lord, Jehovah of Hosts, in the valley of vision ; 


A calling out on the wall, 


And a crying to the mountain. 


own, Job xi. 15; We, chap. xxi. 9; 
1229, Isa. xiv. 19. The archers, acting 
as light infantry, were the part of 
the army chiefly employed in taking 
prisoners. ‘Ox signifies properly ove 
who ts bound ; but it is also used to de- 
note one who is ina state of captivity, 
or confinement, irrespective of the cir- 
cumstance of binding, Gen. xl. 3, 5; 
contrast Judg. xvi. 21. Comp. the Arab. 


|, construcit, captivum fecit; yw), 
5᾽ ᾿ J 
captivitas ; "3, ibid. Not only were 


the rulers and all the ordinary inha- 
bitants pent up as prisoners within 
Jerusalem, but those also who, on the 
approach of the Assyrian army, had 
fled thither from distant parts of the 
country were in the same condition. 
It is to this confinement during the 
siege that the prophet refers, and 
not to any actual flight or capture of 
the fugitives, as most commentators 
imagine. 

4, The more to affect the minds of 
the Jews, the seer describes the incon- 
solable condition into which the scene 
had thrown him, and begs them not 
to attempt to comfort him. See Jer. 
xiii. 17; Lam. ii. 11; Micah i. 8, 9. 
For WW, one of Kennicott’s Codices 
reads 120, which some have thought is 
supported by the LXX., Arab., Syr., 
and Targ. ; but this is uncertain, since 
10, from 110, has much the same sig- 
nification. This reading was probably 
introduced from Lam. iv. 10. 

5. °2 further assigns the cause of the 
prophet’s grief; and he traces the 
calamity to the punishing hand of 


Jehovah. For the formula 775 oY, 
see chap. ii. 12. The three genitives, 
MDI DIM W170, form at once a paro- 
nomasia and a climax, The first de- 
notes a state of xoisy confusion; the 
second, that of persons treading upon 
each other in their eagerness to escape 
from danger; and the third, the hope- 
less perplexity to which they are reduced. 
7a, the root from which 7772 is de- 
rived, signifies ¢o entangle, as in a thicket 


or labyrinth; Arab. Ab, confusum 


turbatumque fuit negotium ; VII. Turbata 
mente et turbatis rationibus fuerunt homi- 
nes. Ἢ Wr, another instance of 
paronomasia. W772, Jarchi and Kimchi 
take to be a denominative from 
the following word, Ὁ, a wall; but 
Gesenius, Winer, and others, refer 
it to 1p, to dig, and render, digging 
through, or undermining, the wall. In 
Numb. xxiv. 17, the only other pas- 
sage in which the Pilpal form occurs, 
the relation in which it stands to yao 
shews that it is used in the acceptation 
of destroying ; hence the LXX. mpovo- 
pevoer; Vulg. vastabit. Here, how- 
ever, the parallel term, 2%, suggests 
the idea of crying, crying out, which is 
the signification of the corresponding 


“2... 


Arab. form, yr barrivit camelus ; 


vocem edidit gallus ; clariorem vocem in 
eee reciprocavit mugiens camelus. 

reytag, and Michaelis’s Supplem. 
No. 2292. To render the assimilation 
of the words more palpable, Ἢ stands 
for "IY, on the wall. So great were 
the vociferations of the despairing 
inhabitants of Jerusalem, that they 


CHAP. XXII.| 


6 For Elam beareth the quiver, 


ISAIAH. 


195 


With chariots of men and horse; 
_ And Kir uncovereth the shield. 
7 Thy choicest valleys are full of chariots, 
And the horse draw up at the gate. 
8 And the vail of Judah is removed, 
And now thou lookest to the armour of the forest-house. 


reached the surrounding mountains, 


“ Resonat magnis plangoribus ether.” 
Virg. Ain. iv. 668. 


6, 7. Isaiah now proceeds to de- 
scribe the appearance of the besieging 
foe. From this verse, compared with 
2 Kings xviii. 11, it is evident that 
Elam or Persia was in the time of the 
prophet subject to the Assyrian power. 
The Elamites, or Elymei, furnished 
a large body of troops, who were 
mostly archers. Στρατιώτας τρέφει 
τοξότας τοὺς πλείστους. Strabo xv. 3. 
12. Forming the light infantry, they 
are mentioned in distinction from the 
war-chariots, and cavalry, also fur- 
nished by the Persians; and from the 
Median or Caucasian warriors, who 
employed the sword and spear. Hence 
the appropriateness of the allusion 
here, and Jer. xlix. 34,35. See Rosenm. 
Bib. Geography, chap. vi. The other 
foreign troops, specified as forming 
auxiliaries in the Assyrian army, came 
from the region on the Kur, V7, Κύρος, 


Armen. 4acp, which takes its rise in 


the mountains of the Caucasus, and, 
flowing through Tiflis, the capital of 
Georgia, joins the Araxes before it 
reaches the Caspian Sea. The name 


of Georgia, δος. δ, Girjistan, is 


obviously a derivative from this an- 
cient name. The natives of the Cau- 
casus still wear shields, as I had an 
opportunity of observing when tra- 
velling there in the year 1821. Those 
which I saw were made of wood or 
strong leather, and surrounded on the 
outside with iron. See Biblical Re- 
searches and Travels in Russia, Lon- 
don, 1826, 8vo. p. 485. From the 
statement made by Isaiah, they appear 
to have preserved them in a cover 


while on their march, in order that 
they might not be injured by rain or 
dust. Comp. the clypeorum involucra 
of Cicero, De Nat. Deor. ii. 14. For 
other Biblical references to this region, 
see 2 Kings xvi. 9; Amos i. 5, ix. 7. 
-Ν 12) is the same as Wx 22), chap. 
xxi. 9; so that there is no necessity, 
with Lowth, to adopt the conjectural 
emendation of Houbigant, Ὅτ 223, 
chariots of Syrians —The Ὁ prefixed 
to DWE in seven MSS., originally in 
two more, and four printed editions, 
is most probably a supply of the 
ellipsis. It is also expressed in the 
Targ—inwd nv, lit. placing, they place, 
z.e. themselves ; but the Infin. is here 
used substantively, and the meaning 
is, the cavalry take their station, or 
draw up in regular order. Thus the 


Fala 
Syr. co320m3, tustruent sese. 


8. THM yoo, the veil or covering of 
Judah, means the fortified places in 
the country which Sennacherib had 
already taken, 2 Kings xviii. 13. The 
root is 920, which signifies ¢o cover, 
protect, and the derivative is used of 
the curtain before the entrance of the 
tabernacle, court, &c. Exod. xxvi. 
36, xxxv. 17. Gesenius supposes the 
language to be that of reproach; the 
figure being taken from the wanton 
and violent tearing away of a vail 
from a virgin; and adduces from the 


life of Timur, las!) Wado a) ω», 


ere the vail be removed; denoting the 
exposure of a people to the greatest 
indignity by the enemy. From the 
antithesis in this verse, it would rather 
seem to indicate the defenceless con- 
dition of a people, than any aftront 
offered them. We may, however, 


compare the Arab. ys velum, cortina ; 


196 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP, XXII. 


9 Yeregard also the breaches of the city of David, which are many, 
And ye collect the water of the lower pool. 
10 Ye number also the houses of Jerusalem, 
And break down the houses to fortify the wall. 
11 And ye make a reservoir between the two walls, 


For the water of the old pool 


But ye look not to Him who doeth this, 
Neither do ye regard Him who long since devised it. 
12 For the Lord, Jehovah of Hosts, calleth on this same day 


ων 5 res omnes qua alia tegitur ; elypeus, 


murus, seu lorica ejus.— WI ma stands 
for prada wma, the house of the forest ψ' 
Lebanon, i.e. the cedar palace which 
Solomon caused to be constructed of 
trees from Lebanon, 1 Kings vii. 2—7, 
x. 21; which appears afterwards to 
have been converted into an arsenal. 
Comp. Neh. iii. 19. It is supposed to 
have been built on the acclivitous 
part of Mount Zion eastward, to which 
was given the name of Ophel. The 
means of defence from without having 
been taken possession of by the 
Assyrians, the inhabitants now per- 
ceived that the only resource left was 
to furnish themselves with anadequate 
supply of weapons from the armoury, 
and offer all the resistance they could 
from within.—The phrase, 877 D¥a, zz 
that day, possesses in this connexion 
the least possible extension of mean- 
ing: it only connects the two events 
specified closely together in point of 
time. Comp. ver. 12, where it is used 
to express the present time, or that 
during which the events were passing. 
The entire passage is a description of 
the present, not a prediction of the 
future. 

9—l1. The city of David formed the 
most southerly and highest part of 
Jerusalem. It lay on Mount Zion, and 
was surrounded with a separate wall, 
which appears at this time to have 
fallen into decay. It derived its 
name from the circumstances of 
David’s taking the citadel of _the 
Jebusites, which stood there, and his 
making it his royal residence.—The 
numbering of the houses seems to 
refer to an inspection undertaken 
with the view of ascertaining which 


might most conveniently be demo- 
lished ; or reference may be had to 
certain houses being pulled down in 
order to obtain materials for repairing 
the wall. In 32nn, the Masoretes mark 
the second nas Raphe, 1.6. there is an 
omission of the Dagesh compensative 
for the first radical—ondn, the two 
walls, 1.6. the one which Hezekiah 
‘caused to be repaired, and the exterior 
one which he built, 2 Chron. xxxii. 5. 
—The old pool was the same as the 
upper pool, chap. vii. 3; called also the 
king’s pool, because its waters irrigated 
the royal gardens, Neh. ii. 14, 11. 15. 
By contriving to throw up a wall 
round it, and along the passage which 
he caused to be dug for its waters into 
the city, the king at once deprived 
the Assyrians of them, and secured 
a supply for the inhabitants. For 
further notices respecting the locali- 
ties here mentioned, see chap. vii. 3. 
—While the Jews were active in pre- 
paring various means of defence, and 
had their attention fixed upon them, 
they forgot God, who, in accomplish- 
ment of an eternal purpose, had 
brought the calamity upon the city. 
Amos, iii. 6. The repetition of the 
same verbs, 023, and 7s}, in the 11th 
verse, which had been employed vers. 
8, 9, adds to the force of the antithesis. 
-- ἜΣ, to form, fashion, has here the sig- 
nification of forming in the mind, pur- 
posing, determining. See chap. xxxvii. 
26, and comp. Gen. vi. 5. 

12, 13. Instead of humbling them- 
selves and confessing their sins before 
the Lord, agreeably to the call which 
he had sent them to that end, the 
Jews indulged in every species of riot, 
and unblushingly gave expression to 
sentiments the most epicurean and 


CHAP. ΧΧΙΠ] 


ISAIAH. 


197 


To weeping and to lamentation ; 
And to baldness, and to girding with sackcloth: 


13 


But, behold! joy and gladness, 


Slaying oxen and killing sheep, 
Hating flesh and drinking wine ! 
—Let us eat and drink; for to-morrow we dic! 


14 
By Jehovah of Hosts: 


But it is revealed in my ears, 


This guilt shall not be pardoned you till ye die, 
Saith the Lord, Jehovah of Hosts. 


15 Thus saith the Lord, Jehovah of Hosts: 


infidel. Nothing more strikingly 
evinces the strength of human de- 
pravity than trifling and reckless 
bravery when men are on the brink 
of destruction.—For the effect of the 


deny the resurrection of the dead, 1 
Cor. xv. 32; and the sentiment they 
convey frequently occurs in heathen 
writers. See Wetstein, or Bloomfield ; 
and the poem of Tarafa, in the Moal- 
lakat, ver 63. 

14, mn—T22, lit. Jehovah hath re- 
vealed himself, i.e. made the following 


revelation. Comp. the Arab. Je, 


clarus fuit, manifeste patuit: V. reve- 
latus, retectus, ac manifestatus fuit, ut 
Deus homini ; bike? , revelatio. 383, 
in my ears, instead of x, to me, from 
the idiomatic use of jis 73, fo wxcover 
the ear, make a communication to any 
one, 1 Sam. xx. 2, et freg—dx, If, a 
formula of swearing which possesses 
a strong negative power. With δ it 
has an affirmative signification. See 
chap. v. 9, where the same introduc- 
tory style is employed, only with an 
ellipsis of 7222.—pnomny, fill ye die, i.e. 
never. The impious Jews should be 
visited with calamity upon calamity, 
till finally Nebuchadnezzar would 
destroy the city. The Targum ex- 
plains the death here mentioned of xn‘ 
xvain, the second death in the world to 
come, which is unwarranted. 


15. Having executed his commission 
with respect to the ungodly inhabit- 
ants of Jerusalem generally, Isaiah 
now receives a message to deliver to 
Shebna, the steward of the royal 
house, who, in all probability, set an 
example of sensual indulgence and 
irreligion, which greatly promoted 
these evils in others. Scholz supposes 
him to have been a powerful statesman 
in the time of Ahaz; and that Heze- 
kiah found him in office at the time of 
his accession, but was unable for some 
time to remove him from his situation. 
This oracle appears to have been 
delivered much about the same time 
with the preceding. Nor can we doubt 
that Shebna and Eliakim mentioned 
in this prophecy are the same persons 
whom we find spoken of, chap. xxxvi. 
3, Xxxvii. 2. It is true Shebna is said 
there to have filled the office of ἜΘ, 
scribe or secretary, which was a situation 
inferior to that of prefect of the 
palace, then held by Eliakim ; but his 
predicted degradation may have com- 
menced with his removal to this 
inferior post, and been first completed 
by his transportation to Assyria, ver. 
18.725, Gesenius interprets in the 
sense of friend, and supposes it to 
denote the familiar friend of the king; 
but it seems preferable to derive its 


signification from the Arab. | Sw, 


quietus, tranquillus fuit, habitavit, Heb. 
72v, and refer it to the residence of 
Shebna in the palace, for the purpose 
of administering its affairs, supplying 


BB 


198 


Go in now to this steward, 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XXII. 


To Shebna, who is over the household, [and say, | 


16 


What hast thou to do here? and whom hast thou here ? 


That thou hewest out here for thyself a sepulchre ? 
—He heweth out his sepulchre on high! 
He cutteth out a mansion for himself in the rock !— 


it with provisions, ἕο. Hence ων.» 


alimentum. The Targ. accordingly ren- 
ders it by 8078, distributor, adminis- 


trator ; and Saadias, Jus 4; which has 


the same signification. With this is 
easily connected the idea of projit, 
wealth, &c. Job xv. 3, xxii. 2, Xxxv. 
3; cherishing, 1330, 1 Kings i. 2, 4.— 
The addition of ™7, the emphatic 
form of the demonstrative pronoun, 
to 7260, “¢his steward,” is expressive 
of a high degree of contempt. See 
Exod. xxxii. 1.—Who is over the house- 
hold, is a more specific description of 
the office designated by 720. The 
Vulg., Targ., and several interpreters 
understand ™27, the house, as signifying 
the temple, and consider Shebna to 
have been the high-priest ; but, though 
the term ™2 is unquestionably used 
both of the tabernacle and the temple, 
the whole phrase, ™27°y Ws, is never 
appropriated to designate the high- 
priest. Between δὲ and 29 there is 
often no difference of meaning, both 
being indiscriminately used in the 
sense of ¢o.—Two of Kennicott’s 
MSS., the LXX,, Syr., Targ., Vulg., 
Arab., and Saad., add v2x m2N}, and 
say to him, which has probably been 
dropped out of the text. 

16. We are not to conclude from 
the formula, 4379, that Shebna was a 
foreigner, or, at least, that he was not 
a native of Jerusalem. It merely 
points out the incongruity of such a 
profane character seeking to per- 
petuate his memory by a splendid 
mausoleum at Jerusalem. Comp. Jer. 
ii.18. Both in this and the co-ordinate 
question is couched the idea that 
neither he nor any of his family should 
remain there. In the second distich, 
the vanity and folly of his making the 
preparations referred toare graphically 
expressed in consequence of a change 


from the second to the third person, 
which allows the prophet by way of 
derision to point to him as thus 
occupied. The " in the participles 
127, and ΡΤ, is paragogic, and is used 
in poetry without at all affecting the 
sense. See Gen. xlix. 11; Deut. 
xxx. 16; Zech. xi. 17.—It was cus- 
tomary in the East for kings, and 
other persons of high rank and dig- 
nity, to have magnificent sepulchres 
excavated in the solid rock, in which 
their remains, and those of their rela- 
tives, were deposited in sarcophagi. 
Witness the immense chambers in 
the face of the mountains about 
Persepolis and other places in Persia ; 
those of Petra, recently discovered ; 
the crypt of Latikea in Syria, and 
various places in Asia Minor; and the 
sepulchres described by Maundrell, 
Clarke, and other travellers, as still 
visible in the rocks about Jerusalem ; 
especially those which extend along 
the side of the ravine to the south- 
west and west of Mount Zion, and 
those on the north of the city, com- 
monly called the sepulchres of the 
kings. See 1 Kings 11. 10; 2 Chron. 
Xxxil. 33; where, as Lowth justly 
observes, 72 should be rendered fhe 
highest, or most elevated, in point of 
position, of the royal sepulchres dug 
out in Mount Zion itself. Neh. iii. 
16.—dN9, elevation, as freq. for D1V23, 
on high, high, &c. Speaking of the 
great mountain-sepulchres to be seen 
at Persepolis, Sir Robert Ker Porter 
observes, “The face of the mountain 
is almost a perpendicular cliff, continu- 
ing to an elevation of scarcely less than 
three hundred yards; the substance 
is a whitish kind of marble. In this 
have been cut the celebrated sculp- 
tures and excavations, so long the 
subjects of discussion with the tra- 
veller, the artist, and the antiquary. 
These singular relics of Persian great- 


CHAP. XXII.] 


ISATAH. 


199 


17 Behold! Jehovah will cast thee headlong, O thou mighty! 
And he will grasp thee firmly : 

18 Whirling thee round and round, he will toss thee 
Like a ball into a wide country : 


There thou shalt die, 


ness are placed very near each other, 
and are all contained within the space 
of not quite the height of the moun- 
tain. Those highest on the rock are 
four ; evidently intended for tombs, 
and as evidently of a date coeval with 
the splendour of Persepolis. The 
range below vary in ability of execu- 
tion ; and are all in a very inferior 
taste to those above.” Travels, vol. i. 
p. 521. The use of the term, }20», 
habitation, in application to the grave, 
is quite in accordance with modes of 
speech current in the East, and other 
parts of the world. Thus Solomon 
speaks of man going at death to "3 
wry, his everlasting or long-enduring 
house, Eccles. xii. 5. The Phoenicians 
also called the sepulchre, Ἐν m1 417, 
the chamber of the eternal house; and 


the Arabs use wines mansio, inter- 
changeably with ye sepulchrum, to 
which they also give the name yo 


NI, the eternal habitation. Comp. 
what Diod. Sic. says of the Egyptians, 


1. 51, τοὺς τῶν τετελευτηκότων τάφους 
ἀϊδίους οἴκους προσαγορεύουσιν, ὡς 
ἐν ἅδου διαστελλόντων τὸν ἄπειρον 
aidva—From the circumstance that 
the prophet was commanded, ΝΞ, to go 
in to Shebna, and, from the commence- 
ment of his address to him, it would 
appear that he was in the sepulchre at 
the time—most likely feeding his 
vanity with the survey of its princely 
dimensions. How unwelcome, at such 
a moment, the announcement con- 
tained in the following verses ! 

17, 18. The original is here pecu- 
liarly impassioned, and possesses a 
graphic power, to which no translation 
can pretend. Not only are there two 
instances of the repetition of the 
same word, to which the Hebrew 
writers are extremely partial, but 
immediately following these, we have 


the three different forms, 7)2¥ 7222) ΠΣ, 
which equals in beauty the πόνος πόνῳ 
πόνον φέρει of Sophocles, Aj. 866, or 
the δόσιν κακὰν κακῶν κακοῖς of Ais- 
chylus, Pers. 1046. Two other ex- 
amples occur, chap. xxvii. 7, in the 
lines :— 

ὙΡΊΒΙΤ NID NIT 

SUPT Ge 


In like manner Micah ii. 4:— 
172 ΠΕΣ 


Comp. also Isa. x. 16, and xxix. 14, 
and the beautiful paronomasia of 
Paul, μὴ ὑπερφρονεῖν map’ ὃ δεῖ φρονεῖν, 
ἀλλὰ φρονεῖν εἰς τὸ σωφρονεῖν, Rom. 
xii. 3.—20700, and 79070, are strongly 
intensitive forms, derived from the 
root 59, ¢o be ony; in Hiph. to throw 


down at full length; Arab. kb, longus 


Suit; 11. ix longum extendit ; IV. in 
longum fecit ; prolongavit. See Ewald’s 
Gram. § 235, where 7970 is rendered 
to hurl.— 22, Lowth, Dathe, Jenour, 
Jones, Gesenius, Maurer, and others, 
take to be a substantive, used adjec- 
tively to qualify 77070, which they 
consider the less usual form of the 
feminine construct, as did Joseph 
Kimchi and other Rabbins. The Syr., 
however, David Kimchi, Lib. Rad. sb 
voce. 9, Munster, Pagninus, Leo Juda, 
and, among the moderns, Hensler, 
Rosenmiiller, Boothroyd, Hitzig, and 
Scholz, read it in the vocative; which 
is preferable. It differs from 23, 
which more appropriately describes 
one distinguished for military valour ; 
whereas 123 simply conveys the idea of 
power, violence, insolence, &c.; Arab. 


ye religavit, consolidavit ; V. super- 


bivit, exrtulit se; and comp. pe V. 


semet extulit et superbivit. It may, 
however, after all, be only used in this 
place as ἄνθρωπε is by Paul, Rom. 11, 


200 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XXII. 


And there shall be thy splendid chariots ; 
Thou disgrace to the house of thy lord! 


19 


For I will drive thee from thy post, 


And pull thee down from thy station. 


And it shall be in that day that I will call my servant, 


Even Eliakim, the son of Hilkiah ; 


21 


And will clothe him with thy robe, 


And bind thy girdle around him ; 
And thy government will I commit to his hand, 
And he shall become a father to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, 


And to the house of Judah. 


22 I will also place the key of the house of David upon his 


shoulder ; 


3, λογίζῃ δὲ τοῦτο, ὦ ἄνθρωπε: and by 
Galen: οὐ βούλει μαθεῖν, ἄνθρωπε, τὴν 
τῶν Ἑλλήνων διάλεκτον, to give inten- 
sity to the sentence———7uY is here 
used, not in accordance with the sig- 


nification of (ke, obscura fuit nox, 


tezit rem, so as that the meaning 
would be wrap or roll up, a8 In a 


mantle—but with that of lle, manu 


accept rem; ad festinandum impulit 
aliquem, Kamoos; and expresses the 
sudden and resistless grasp with which 
one lays hold on any person or thing 
with a view to secure its expulsion.— 
—F2z, whence 22, a tiara or turban, 
signifies to ¢wist or roll round, as the 
Orientals do in wrapping their turbans 
round their heads, It is employed in 
this place to describe the significant 
action of whirling a stone or ball 
several times round with the hand, or 
in a sling, in order to acquire strength 
and steadiness of aim before throwing 
it toadistance. The triple use of the 
word, as noticed above, gives singular 
effect to the passage-—By the j OX 
orn nam, lit. the land wide of hands, is 
meant the extensive country of As- 
syria, into which Shebna was to be 
carried captive. There he should 
behold in the hands of the enemy the 
splendid equipages in which he was 
accustomed to ride in state about 
Jerusalem ; and there he was to end 
his days in disgrace. 

19. The prophet descends from the 


highly figurative language which he 
had employed, and, in plain terms, 
announces to Shebna his removal 
from office. This he does by intro- 
ducing God himself as addressing him, 
and then continues the address in the 
third person—a change very common 
with the prophets——Both nouns, 239, 
and 72¥2, convey the idea of fixeduess 
or stability, and enhance the force of 
the language. Instead of ἼΘ᾽, one 
of De Rossi’s MSS., the Syr., Vulg., 
and Saadias, read ΠΡ τς, but the change 
was most likely effected to remove the 
enallage persone. 

20—22 contain a prediction of the 
transfer of the insignia of office to 
Eliakim, the new steward, and of the 
happy consequences of his adminis- 
tration. 0228, which is elsewhere only 
used of the splendid girdles worn by 
the priests, is of uncertain derivation. 
Most are inclined to regard the δὶ as 
prosthetic, and trace a connexion be- 


tween it and Nu, lend, a Persie word 


signifying a band or vinculum; but it 
is more probably of Egyptian origin. 
For the signification of 38, a father, as 
here used, see on chap. ix. 5. Instead 
of the pride and egotism of Shebna, 
the inhabitants would find in Ehakim 
the tenderness and benevolent care of 
a parent—In the East the key is a 
symbol of power or authority, with 
special reference to palaces, treasures, 
stores, &c. It resembles a sickle with 
a long handle ; and the crooked part 


CHAP. XXII.] 


ISATAH. 


201 


And he shall open, and none shall shut; 
And he shall shut, and none shall open. 
23 Yea, I will fasten him as a peg in a sure place, 
And he shall become a throne of glory to his father’s house ; 
24 And they shall hang upon him the whole multitude of his 


father’s house ; 
The offspring and the offsets, 
All the vessels of small size, 


is so formed as to allow of its being 
suspended on the shoulder or round 
the neck. That it actually formed 
part of the insignia of office, and that 
the language is not to be taken figura- 
tively, is unquestionable. Among the 
Greeks it was worn as a badge of 
sacerdotal dignity. Katwpadiav δ᾽ ἔχε 
κλεῖδα, Callim. in Cerem. ver. 45. See 
Lowth’s Note. 

From the language of ver. 22, being 
in part appropriated by our Lord to 
assert his sole and exclusive power, 
Rey. 111. 7, many have supposed that 
what is here said respecting Eliakim 
was designed to apply to him in his 
mediatorial capacity; but the inter- 
pretation is altogether arbitrary. 
“ Locum hunc ad Christum perperam 
nonnulli transtulerunt: quando pro- 
pheta duos inter se homines comparat, 
nempe Sobnam et Eliacim. Privabitur 
Sobna: succedit autem Eliacim. Quid 
hee ad Christum?” Calvin, ἐμ /oe. 
A similar figurative application Christ 
makes of the words, when investing 
Peter with apostolical authority, Matt. 
xvi. 19. 


23. 1, Arab. a Plur. ob,), pan- 


illus; clavis ligneus, qui in terra vel 
pariete pangitur. 'The word is used of 
the pins or small stakes driven into 
the ground for the purpose of fasten- 
ing a tent, the cords of which hook 
into them. It is also employed to 
denote a large peg or wooden pin, 
such as the Orientals fix in the walls 
of their houses, for the purpose of 
hanging upon them household uten- 
sils, vails, and other articles in con- 
stant use. See Ezek. xy. 3, where the 
question is put respecting the vine: 
202 Yop nino ay woo anprox, Will they 
take a peg from it on which to hang any 


vessel? The prophet here uses it me- 
taphorically, in application to the sup- 
port which Eliakim would yield to all 
his dependent relations. Comp. Ezra 
ix. 8; Zech. x. 4. In like manner, 
Pharaoh is said in the Koran, xxxviii. 


11, to be obs 99) the Possessor of the 


pegs, i. 6. the lord of princes, or per- 
sons high in station, on whom others 
depended.—7a1} N03, a glorious seat or 
throne, is the elevated chair or place 
of honour usually ornamented with 
gold, silver, &c. Comp. 1 Sam. ii. 8. 
The meaning is, that he would be a 
great support to his family, by pro- 
curing for them, through his influence 
with the king, situations of emolu- 
ment and honour. 

24, 132, which had been used in 
the preceding verse, is here repeated, 
but in the acceptation of abundance or 
multitude. That of glory does not suit 
the following enumeration, which in- 
cludes vessels of inferior character.— 
Both Dxgez and nivee are botanical 
terms,—the former descriptive of 
what comes out of the earth generally, 
and applied figuratively to children, 
Job v. 25, xxi. 8; Isa. xlviii. 19, lxi. 9; 
the latter, of the worthless shoots of 
trees, and, excepting in this passage, 
only used figuratively, in the form 
voz, of the progeny of vipers, chap. 
xiv. 29. Comp. ‘2%, Isa. xi. 8, lix. 5. 


The mas. rps, Arab. ened » signifies ez- 


crementum, for which 78% and 7s‘ are 
also used; hence the idea of vile, 
ignoble.—™ 32, the Targ. Syr. and 
Vulg., render, musical instruments, which 
signification the word certainly has, 
in application to the ναβλία, a species 
of harp or lyre; but its occurring 
here, in immediate connexion with 


202 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP, XXIII. 


From those used as cups even to all used as pitchers. 
25 In that day, saith Jehovah of Hosts, 
The peg shall be removed that is fastened in a sure place ; 
Yea, it shall be cut down and fall ; 
And the load that is upon it shall be cut off: 


For Jehovah hath spoken it. 


mix, requires that of dottles or pitchers. 
The LXX. reduces the whole descrip- 
tion to: ἀπὸ μικροῦ ἕως μεγάλου. All 
belonging to Eliakim, whatever their 
stations or employment, would be bet- 
tered in their circumstances by his 
elevation. . 

25. The Targ., Jerome, Michaelis, 
Hitzig, and Scholz, consider Eliakim 
to be the person here intended, and 
suppose his future fall to be predicted ; 
but Jarchi, Kimchi, Munster, Forerius, 
Calvin, Vitringa, both the Lowths, 
Déderlein, Dathe, Rosenmiler, Gese- 


nius, and Hensler, more properly refer 
the words to Shebna, to whom, at the 
close of his message, the prophet 
transfers the language which he had 
just employed, in order to assure him, 
that however firmly he and his family 
might now think themselves estab- 
lished, their fall was certain.—v23, is 
the term commonly used for cutting 
down a tree, or any thing made of wood, 
and is therefore appropriately used in 
application to the wooden peg, which 
could not otherwise be removed with- 
out endangering the wall. 


‘CHAPTER XXIII. 


THE SENTENCE OF TYRE. 


The next object of prophetic denunciation is Tyre, the great antiquity, com- 
mercial prosperity, and prowess of which Isaiah here describes. He also 
forcibly depicts her unexpected destruction by the Chaldwans, whom, in the 
time of the prophet, the Assyrian monarch had only just settled in the 
country about Babylon, but who are represented as the instruments em- 
ployed for effecting the purpose of Jehovah, 1—16 ; he limits the period of 
her depression to seventy years, 17; and predicts the revival of her com- 
merce, the proceeds of which should not, as formerly, be hoarded up in 
treasuries, but devoted to advance the interests of the church of God, 18. 
The language is terse, highly figurative, and sublime,—quite in the style 
of our prophet, but unlike that of any later writer. The occurrence of 
row for M8, and ΤΡ for Tw, ver. 11, and the use of the term 7%, in 
reference to the Nile, ver. 3, which some have alleged against his being the 
author, are so trifling, as scarcely to deserve notice. See the notes to these 
verses. 

Tyre having sustained three sieges by Asiatic powers : the first by Shalmane- 
ser, in the reign of Hezekiah, B.c. 717; the second by Nebuchadnezzar, B.c. 
573; and the third by Alexander the Great, B.c. 332; interpreters are 


CHAP. XXIII.] ISATAH. 203 


greatly divided in their opinions in regard to the application of the pro- 
phecy. To the last of these, however, few have been disposed to refer it. 
Grotius, Greve, Hensler, Volney, and recently, Gesenius and Maurer, think 
the first is intended ; but that the second is the only one to which the 
oracle can consistently be applied, is more or less ably maintained by 
Jerome, Vitringa, Lowth, Michaelis, Déderlein, Dathe, Eichhorn, Bertholdt, 
Rosenmiiller, De Wette, Hengstenberg, Hitzig, and Scholz, how much soever 
they differ in their views respecting the writer, and the authority of his 
prophecy. The most specious reason alleged against this opinion is that 
advanced by Gesenius; viz. that in heathen writers there is a total silence 
respecting the actual subjugation of Tyre by Nebuchadnezzar ; but (not to 
insist on the very passing character of the references to the siege found in 
these authors, see Joseph. Antiq. lib. x. cap. 11, § 1; Con. Apion, i. § 21) 
that commentator, more than once in his Commentary, is obliged to admit 
that events specified by the Hebrew prophets may have happened, though 
no information can be obtained respecting them from foreign sources. 
Besides, the very circumstance that no notice is taken of the result of 
the siege affords presumptive ground for believing that it was successful ; 
since, had it been otherwise, it was scarcely possible to avoid mentioning it. 
But, however it may be in regard to foreign sources of information, the 
Scriptures are positive in the decision which they deliver upon the subject. 
Ezekiel expressly predicts the fall of Tyre as the consequence of the attack 
of Nebuchadnezzar, chap. xxvi.4—21. Nor does the declaration made chap. 
xxix. 18, at all contradict this prophecy: the meaning obviously being, that 
what the king of Babylon found in Tyre was no adequate remuneration for 
the hardships and losses which his army had sustained, and the immense 
expense to which he had been put during a siege of thirteen years’ contin- 
uance. We may, therefore, reasonably acquiesce in the remark of Reland, 
respecting the entertainment of doubts upon the subject: “ Certe Christi- 
anos id non decet. Deus predixerat. Hoc sufficit. Res ita evenit, uti 
preedicta est, etiamsi nulli veterum literis id consignassent.” Palestina, tom. 
ii. p. 1050. Compare, in illustration of this chapter, the sublime parallel 
predictions, Ezek. xxvi. xxvii. xxviii. 


1 How1, ye ships of Tarshish, 
For it is laid waste ; 


Though not so ancient as Zidon, of 


1, W, in full, W2; Arab. py? the 


Sarra of Virgil and Juvenal, and the 
Sara of Plautus ; Gr. Τύρος, ΤΎΒΕ ; the 
celebrated emporium of the Pheeni- 
cians, situated on the coast of the 
Mediterranean, within the confines 
of the tribe assigned to Asher, but 
never subdued by the Israelites. 


which it was originally a colony, it 
was of great antiquity, ver. 7, Josh. 
xix. 29; and was built partly on the 
continent, and partly on an island 
opposite, at the distance, according to 
Pliny, of seven hundred paces from 
the shore. To the former was given 
the name of Palatyrus, (Παλαιὰ Tupos,) 


204 ISATAH. 


[CHAP, XXIII. 


There is neither house, nor entrance ! 
From the land of Chittim it is disclosed to them. 


Old Tyre, on the supposition that it 
was built before the insular part, which 
latterly became so celebrated. It is, 
however, uncertain whether the island, 
which was advantageously situated 
for maritime transactions, did not, 
from the first, form an out-port, or 
station, with warehouses, in which 
were deposited the principal articles of 
Phoenician traffic. The continental 
city appears to be that specially meant 
by the phrase, 27222 VW», the Cily of the 
Sortress of Tyre, or, of the fortress on the 
Rock, Josh. xix. 29, comp. 2 Sam. xxiv. 
7, in allusion to the rock of which the 
island is composed, and opposite to 
which it lay along the coast, to the 
distance of thirty stadia southward, 


near the present } \,. Ras-el-ain. 
Ρ SE OY) 


Diod. Sic. xvii. 40; Curtius, iv. 2; 
Plin. v. 17; Strabo, xvi. 2. At this 
place are still visible vestiges of the 
aqueduct built across the isthmus to 
Tyre. Though at first inferior to 
Zidon, Tyre soon surpassed it, and 
was for ages the great centre of com- 
merce in the ancient world. She 
planted colonies along the coasts of 
Asia Minor, Greece, Cyprus, Libya, 
and Spain ; among others, the popu- 
lous and powerful Carthage. Till after 
the days of David and Solomon, with 
whom Hiram the son of Abibaal, king 
of the Tyrians, was in close alliance, 
the inhabitants appear to have carried 
on their mercantile pursuits unmo- 
lested; but they were at length at- 
tacked by Shalmaneser, who, after a 
blockade of five years, was obliged to 
abandon the attempt to subdue them. 
A renewed attack was made by Ne- 
buchadnezzar, who, though the city 
made a resistance of upwards of thir- 
teen years, succeeded in reducing it, 
and bringing it under the power of 
the Babylonians. It was afterwards 
taken by Alexander the Great, B.c. 332 ; 
regained much of its importance as a 
commercial city under the Seleucidz 
and the Romans ; and continued to be 
a place of considerable note even in 
the time of the Crusades. Till within 
some years past, it has been reduced 


to a miserable village, containing only 
about fifty or sixty poor families ; 
though relics of its ancient splendour 
lie scattered, in numerous and beauti- 
ful columns, along the beach. The 
causeway of Alexander is now covered 
by an isthmus of sand about 500 
French metres in length. 

The prophet begins by addressing 
himself to the passengers and crews 
of those Tyrian merchantmen which 
were homeward bound, at the time of 


the fall of the city ; and while he calls 


upon them to bewail the disastrous 
event, he states how they became ac- 
quainted with it: vz. through the 
medium of Pheenician colonists on the 
islands and coasts of the Mediterra- 
nean, which they were accustomed to 
pass on their return. For the mean- 
ing of Zarshish, see on ver. 10. By 
ὉΠ IX, the land of the Chittim, are 
meant the islands and maritime re- 
gions on the northern shores of the 
Mediterranean, especially those on the 
coasts of Greece and the Aigean sea. 
Comp. 1 Mace. i. 1, where Alexander 
is said to have gone forth ἐκ τῆς γῆς 
Χεττειείμ, and viil. 5, where Perseus is 
called Κιτιέων βασιλεύς. There seems 
no sufficient ground to extend the sig- 
nification of the name to Italy and its 
islands, as Bochart and others have 
done. The M2, or 0°73, were, accord- 
ing to the genealogical table, Gen. x. 4, 
descendants of Javan, by whom also, 
in all probability, the island of Cyprus 
was first peopled. Hence Κίτιον, Ci- 
tium, the name of its capital city, 
which, from its contiguity to Tyre, 
and its importance on other accounts, 
was chiefly inhabited by Phoenician 
colonists ; as indeed, according to He- 
rodotus, vii. 90, were most of its 
cities. That this island is to be in- 
cluded among the Chittic regions here 
referred to, cannot be doubted; but 
it is not exclusively meant, as Gese- 
nius supposes. On the contrary, the 
use of the plural Oxy, Ezek. xxvii. 6, 
satisfactorily shews that more than 
one island or maritime region are in- 
tended. The news of the fall of Tyre 


would speedily be communicated from . 


CHAP. XXIII.] 


ISATAH. 


205 


2 Be astonished, ye inhabitants of the isle, 

Which the merchants of Zidon, that crossed the sea, supplied. 
3 For on the great waters was the produce of Sihor ; 

The harvest of the river was her revenue : 

And she was the mart of nations. 


one colony to another, so that those 
who were returning from Spain would 
be informed of the catastrophe, at 
whatever port they might happen to 
touch.—For the privative force of [9 in 
sia M2, see chap. xvii. 1. Not only 
would the residences of the merchants 
and their warehouses be destroyed, 
but so complete would be the destruc- 
tion of the place, that the harbour or 
quays would be inaccessible. Comp. 
Ezek, xxvi. 4, 5. 

2. Ὁ Vitringa understands collec- 
tively of the coasts of the Mediterra- 
nean: but it is rather to be inter- 
preted, as at ver. 6, of Tyre itself, 
with special reference to the island, 
which, in a maritime point of view, 
occupied the most prominent place. 
Hendewerk thinks it comprehends the 
whole of the Pheenician coast.—0?2}, 
to be still, silent, to be struck dumb with 
astonishment, Lam. 11. 10. The impera- 
tive is used for the future to express 
the certainty of the predicted calamity. 
Before pT? WO supply Ws. By the 
merchants of Zidon are meant, not sim- 
ply or strictly those resident in that 
city at the time, but Phenician mer- 
chants generally. LXX. μετάβολοι Φοι- 


vikns.—}iTz, Zidon, still called, ἴδιο, 


Saide, which, according to Strabo, lay 
at the distance of two hundred stadii 
north of Tyre, appears originally to 
have been merely a fishing station ; 
for such the name imports: but at a 
very early period it became a cele- 
brated mercantile city. Jacob speaks 
of it in his time in connexion with 
shipping, Gen. xlix. 13; and Joshua, 
chap. ΧΙ. 8, xix. 28, calls it great Zidon. 
The name was also given to the whole 
territory, to some extent round the 
city ; whence the term Zidonians came 
tocomprehend the Pheenicians in gene- 
ral,—the Tyrians themselves also in- 
cluded. Thus Ethbaal, whom Menan- 
der (Joseph, Antiq. viii. 13.2) informs 


us was king of Tyre, is called “king 
of the Zidonians,’ 1 Kings xvi. 31. 
Comp. chap. v. 1,6. And Homer re- 
peatedly speaks of the Σιδονίοι, when 
referring to Phoenician arts and wares, 
without ever mentioning Tyre, though 
this city must have already, in his 
time, been in a very flourishing con- 
dition. Zidon was indeed speedily 
eclipsed by its rival, and generally 
shared its fate. On several existing 
Phoenician coins, the name, D212 ἘΝ, the 
mother, i. 6. the metropolis, of the Zido- 
nians, is given to Tyre. Inthe present 
day, it seems to be again rising into 
some importance ; containing upwards 
of eight thousand inhabitants ; and 
carrying on a considerable commerce. 
A few scanty remains of the ancient 
city are still discoverable in the 
vicinity. 

3. Michaelis, Hengstenberg, and 
others, consider the language of the 
prophet to be metaphorical, and sup- 
pose him to speak of the produce of 
the sea, or the widely-extended mari- 
time trade of the Pheenicians, as being 
to Tyre what the rich harvest accruing 
from the inundation of the Nile was 
to the Egyptians. It is more natural 
to take the words literally, as descrip- 
tive of the extensive trade in Egyptian 
grain carried on in Pheenician vessels, 
which was first exported to Tyre, and 
thence conveyed to various ports in 
the Mediterranean. Though Egypt 
abounded in grain, yet the inhabitants 
left its exportation to foreigners. He- 
rodotus expressly mentions that Phce- 
nicians of Tyre inhabited the district 
round the fane of Proteus, at Memphis, 
and from this circumstance the dis- 
trict was called “the camp of the 
Tyrians,” Ὁ. 11.112, Naucratis, on the 
western branch of the Delta, was 
otherwise the ancient emporium for 
foreign commerce.—For the applica- 
tion of τῶ, Shzhor, to the Nile, comp. 
Jer. ii. 18, where it unquestionably has 


cc 


200 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XXIII. 


4 Be ashamed, O Zidon! for the sea hath spoken, 
The fortress of the sea, saying : 
I was not in labour; neither did I bear children ; . 
I nourished no youths, neither did I bring up virgins. 
5 As at the report concerning Egypt, 
So shall they be in pain at the report of Tyre. 


6 Cross over to Tarshish ; 


Howl, ye inhabitants of the isle! 


7 Is this your joyous city, 


Whose antiquity is of ancient days ? 
Her own feet bear her to sojourn afar ! 


this signification ; and that it cannot 
have any otherreference here isevident 
both from the circumstances of the 
case, and from the use of the parallel 
term δ, commonly used of the same 
river. The Shihor mentioned Josh. xiii. 
3, and 1 Chron, xiii. 5, is merely the 
“Ῥινοκόρουρα, or El-arish, a torrent on 
the confines of Egypt and Palestine. 
The name, which is derived from WW», 
to be black, obviously refers to the tur- 
bid appearance of the Nile, which for 
the-same reason the Greeks called 
Μέλας, and the Latins Melo. The seed 
and harvest are said to be those of 
that river, because they were produced 
by its inundation. The fem. pronom, 
suffix in 7nNIn belongs to °x, the isle, 
ver. 2. The best comment on the last 
clause of the verse is furnished Ezek. 
XXVil. 

4, Sidon is again put for Pheenicia, 
or the Phcenicians, in general. To 
render 0 more definite, the prophet 
adds ἘΝῚ 122, the fortress of the sea, 
which describes the maritime situation 
and strength of Tyre. Comp. Ezek. 
xxvi. 17, xxvii. 4,25; Zech. ix. 3. So 
entire should be the desolation of the 
place, that, to the eye of the spectator, 
it would appear never to have been 
inhabited. To express this more 
strongly a personification is employed. 
Before 22 repeat 8), with the LXX,, 
Vulg., Targ., Syr., and Arab. 

5. Most translators and commenta- 
tors suppose that the prophet here 
refers to the report of the fall of Tyre 
reaching Egypt ; but it is more pro- 
bable he had in view the terror and 


consternation which seized the Canaan- 
ites when they heard of the destruc- 
tion of the Egyptians at the Red Sea, 
—so beautifully described in the ode 
of Moses, Exod. xv. 14, Yo corres- 
ponds to θοῦ, and > to mx 0, in 
that passage. 

6. Again using the imperative for 
the future, Isaiah predicts the only 
resource left to the Tyrians—the dis- 
tant Tartessus, to which they would 
proceed by sea, and thus be out of the 
reach of the enemy. Those who had 
connexions in that colony would natu- 
rally repair thither; just as after- 
wards, when attacked by Alexander, 
the inhabitants of Tyre fled to Car- 
thage, and the islands of Greece. 

7. The language of astonishment at 
the change which had taken place in 
her condition. Formerly all was proud 
exultation ; now all was silence. The 
interrogative form implies, in such 
connexion, the strongest affirmative. 
However incredible, such was the state 
to which Tyre should be reduced. 
Before πρὴν supply YY, or ™7.—That 
Tyre was very ancient all authorities 
agree. The priests of Hercules boasted 
to Herodotus that their temple, which 
was built on the island, was of equal 
antiquity with the city herself—both 
having been founded two thousand 
three hundred years before the time 
when he consulted them. Hist i. 44. 
Arrian says of the same temple that 
it is “vetustissimum eorum, que hu- 
mana memoria serventur.” Hist. 1. 
16. Strabo, b. xvi. speaks of Tyre as 
next to Zidon, μεγίστη τῶν Φοινίκων 


CHAP. XXIII. | 


8 Who hath purposed this 


ISAIAH. 


207 


Against Tyre, the dispenser of crowns ; 


Whose merchants are princes, 


Whose traders are the honourable of the earth ? 
9 Jehovah of Hosts hath purposed it ; 
To defile the pride of all the elegant, 
To render contemptible all the honourable of the earth. 
10 Overflow thy land like the river, O daughter of Tarshish! 


καὶ ἀρχαιοτάτη πόλις. According to 
Josephus, it was built two hundred 
and forty years before the foundation 
of Solomon’s temple ; but it has, with 
great probability, been conjectured, 
that some numerical inaccuracy has 
here crept into the text of the Jewish 
historian ; for, as we have seen, it is 
already mentioned as a place of note 
in the time of Joshua. Justin ascribes 
its origin to Agenor, the father of 
Cadmus, and dates it from the year be- 
fore the destruction of Troy.—In the 
combination, A272 ΘΠ) Ὁ Ὁ, is an easy 
paronomasia.—Some, with Grotius, 
understand 90, her feet, figuratively, 
as denoting the ships of Tyre, by 
means of which her inhabitants went 
to distant parts, to plant colonies, το. ; 
but there seems no just reason why 
we should depart from the literal sig- 
nification of the term, which is merely 
empioyed for the purpose of shewing 
that they betook themselves to flight, 
and were not led away captive by the 
enemy—an idea which 727 might 
otherwise have been thought to ex- 


press. Comp. the Arab. es vehe- 


menter propulit predam. 

8, 9. Such was the prowess of Tyre 
that she was considered invincible by 
human arms. Her destruction, there- 
fore, though mediately effected by the 
Babylonians, could only be accounted 
for by resolving it into the purpose of 
Jehovah, who gave them the victory. — 
ΤΥ ὭΣΤ, coronatrix, coronam imponens, 
refers to the power which she exer- 
cised in the Pheenician colonies, be- 
stowing the regal dignity at her plea- 
sure. That Arad, Arke, Carthage, 
Citium, Tartessus, &c. were governed 
by kings under the supremacy of the 
mother-state, clearly appears from the 


statements of the ancients. By oy, 
princes, are meant senators and coun- 
cillors, who were chosen from among 
the opulent merchants to augment the 
magnificence of the court. Comp. 
Ezek. xxvi. 16. The synonymous 
ys77222. comprehends all who filled 
posts of dignity. Gesenius and Scholz 
render incorrectly, the opulent of the 
earth——72P22, lit. her Canaanites ; but 
as the inhabitants of Canaan were ce- 
lebrated for their commercial pursuits, 
the term came to signify merchants 
generally. Job xl. 30; Hos. xii. 8. 
‘12, splendour, beauty, refers to the 
niwy, crowns, bestowed by Tyre, ver. 8, 
(comp. 127, Ps. Ixxxix. 40,) and 
stands for ἊΣ ΣΝ, men of splendour, the 
magnates of Tyre and her colonies.— 
Between ὙΠ᾿ and 73)) is a striking anti- 
thesis ; the latter word signifying to be 
laden, heavy with honour ; the former 
to make light, remove the weight of 
honour, sender contemptible. Comp. 
chap. vii. 23. 

10. This verse most interpreters 
deem very obscure; but this obscurity 
has chiefly arisen from want of atten- 
tion to the idiomatic force of ΠΣ, 
daughter of Tarshish. Vitringa, Lowth, 
and others, suppose Tyre herself, or 
the Tyrians, to be meant, and attempt 
to justify their interpretation on the 
ground that Tyre being ruined, Tar- 
shish must be considered as occupying 
her place as mother of the Phenician 
colonies ; but, as I have shewn in the 
note to chap. i. 8, the words can only 
properly mean the inhabitants of Tar- 
shish ; and here such inhabitants in 
contradistinction from the Tyrians.— 
By ww, there can no longer be any 
reasonable doubt, we are to understand 
Tartessus, the ancient and celebrated 
emporium of the Pheenicians, situated 


208 


The restraint 1s no more. 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XXIL. 


11 Jehovah hath stretched his hand over the sea,. 
He hath caused the kingdoms to shake ; 


between the two mouths of the river 
Betis, (now Guadalquiver,) on the 
south-western coast of Spain. To this 
port they conveyed the produce of 
the East; and procured, in return, 
gold, silver, and iron, from the mines 
which abounded in that country, and 
lead and tin from the Scilly islands. 
Herod. iv. 152; Plin. iii. 3; Mal. 11.6; 
Strabo, iii. 147—149 ; Bochart, Phaleg. 
ili. 7; Michaelis, Spicileg. i. p. 82; 
Diod. Sic. ν. 35—38; Ezek. xxvii. 12— 
25. How long it flourished we are 
not informed. It was no longer in 
existence in the time of Strabo, iii. 
151. The LXX. do not seem to have 
known it; at all events they either 
retain the name in the form Θάρσεις, 
Θάρσις, or render Kapxndév, Carthage 
—never Ταρτησσος, or Ταρσηΐον, as the 
word is spelt in Polybius and Steph. 
Byzant. From Ps. Ixxii. 10, where 
ww 2 occurs in contradistinction 
from 81D) 81D 30, the term appears to 
have been used in a more extended 
sense, as comprehending all the mari- 
time nations in the west of Europe. 
Abulfeda says, that Tunis, built from 
the ruins of Carthage, and only two 
miles from them, was also called 


Tarsis : ws lghe write us a) 
ἜΣ ry pwd: Whether Solo- 


mon’s fleet, fitted out at Eziongeber, 
on the Alanitic arm of the Red Sea, 
doubling the southern promontory of 
Africa, proceeded to Tartessus, or whe- 
ther it went to a place of the same 
name in India, cannot be determined. 
There may have been a Spanish and 
an Indian Zurshish, just as the name 
India came to be transferred from the 
East to the distant West. So much 
seems certain, that in none of the pas- 
sages in which Tarshish occurs can 
Tarsus in Cilicia be intended.—The 
prophet here announces to the natives 
of Tartessus, who had been brought 
into subjection to the Pheenicians, 
that they were now at liberty to 
spread themselves over their own 


land; the band by which they had 
been held in restraint having been 
broken, Considering the extent to 
which slavery existed among the an- 
cients, there is little doubt that the 
powerful Tyrian princes reduced num- 
bers of the native Spaniards to bon- 
dage, compelling them to work in the 
mines, &c. m2 here, and Ps. cix. 19, 
like M9, Job xii. 21, properly signifies 
a girdle, but may be. used to denote 
that with which any person is bound, 
and tropically the power by which a 
people is held in subjection ; which in 
the present case was Tyre. Thus the 


m mo 
Syr. woN\ Land? he who drives, or 
The root is mm, Arab. 
jp move away ; and the form is that 


impels thee. 


of the participle in Hiph. lke 209, 
1 Kings vi. 29; 9, Ezek. xxxi. 3. 
That the comparison is taken from 
the inundation of the Nile is clear, 
both from the use of the appropriated 
word τ, and from the aptness of the 
reference ; the waters that were pent 
up flowing over the face of the coun- 
try as soon as the mound is broken 
through. The LXX., reading ‘729 in- 
stead of 2Y, render ἐργάζου τὴν γῆν 
ood, cultivate thy land, and then para- 
phrase, καὶ yap πλοῖα οὐκέτι ἐρχόνται 
ἐκ Καρχηδόνος, for ships no longer come 
Jrom Carthage:—an excellent sense, 
were it all warranted by the original; 
but this not being the case, Michaelis 
was quite unjustifiable in adopting it. 

11. The nominative to 3, is Tin, 
following, a mode of construction not 
infrequent in Heb. poetry, but which 
is best expressed in western languages 
by employing the noun first. 0, the 
sea, means those who trade by sea, the 
Pheenicians. Comp. ver. 4. The ni3229 
are the petty states or kingdoms of 
the Pheenicians, as Tyre, Zidon, Ara- 
dus, &c. This the use of 723, Canaan, 
immediately after clearly shews. 1525 
is here specially employed to denote 
Phenicia, or that part of Canaan which 
lay at the foot of Lebanon, and so 


CHAP. XXIII.] 


ISAIAH. 


He hath given charge concerning Canaan, 


To destroy her strongholds. 


12 Yea, he hath said, Thou shalt exult no more, 
O violated virgin, the daughter of Zidon. 


Arise! cross over to Chittim τ᾿ 


Yet there thou shalt have no rest. 


called on account of its low situation, 
from 523, to bend, be low, depressed ; 


τ 
Arab. εὖ » contractus fuit, inclinavit in 


occasum stella, &c.; se submisit. That 
its inhabitants appropriated the name 
κατ᾽ ἐξοχὴν to themselves, appears from 
their coins, and from the fact that it 
was also retained by the Carthaginians, 
who came originally from the same 
coast. See Gesenius iz Joc.—28 
stands for TUT), as 22 for 7227), 
Numb. v. 22. In such cases the 7 is 
omitted, as in the Fut. and Part. of 
Hiph., and its vowel is assumed by 
the °. The } in Tuya is not a Chal- 
deeism, as Vitringa, Eichhorn, and 
others imagine, the idiom in such 
case requiring it to be placed before 
the tand not after it; but a rare in- 
stance of the Nun Epenthetic before a 
pronominal affix. The nearest ap- 
proach I can find to it is 53», his exist- 
ence ; for % is properly a substantive, 
though frequently used as a substitute 
for ™7. It seems better to adopt 
such resolution of the difficulty, than 
with Michaelis and Jahn to consider 
the 2 to be radical, and then attempt 
to derive a meaning to the word from 


the Arab. "ἢ 7.5 or a Sia Gesen. in- 


geniously compares 72 for mY, Lev. 
xi. 13, with the present instance of 
Wyn for Trp. See Lex. Robin. Ed. 
1844, p. 775. The strongholds of Ca- 
naan to which the prophet refers were 
doubtless Old and Insular Tyre, Sidon, 
Arke, Aradus, &c., which were de- 
stroyed by Nebuchadnezzar. Perhaps 
Carthage, Tartessus, and other cities 
fortified by the Pheenicians, may also 
be intended ; for we learn from Strabo 
and Megasthenes, that this monarch, 
after the reduction of Tyre, conquered 
Egypt, penetrated the north of Africa 
as far as the Pillars of Hercules, and 
even subdued Iberia, or Spain. 


12. The daughter of Zidon means 


the Zidonians, just as the daughter of 


Tuarshish, ver. 10, means the Tartes- 
sians, and not Tyre exclusively, as 
some interpret: yet the appellation is, 
in this connexion, to be extended to 
those inhabiting the Pheenician terri- 
tory generally, and is not to be re- 
stricted to such as belonged to the 
city of Zidon. See Gesen. ἐμ voc. ΡῈ, 
The Orientals are accustomed to speak 
of a country or city which has never 
been conquered, as an unviolated 
virgin. Such Zidon, or Pheenicia, as 
a whole, had been down to the attack 
of Nebuchadnezzar. The country had, 
indeed, been overrun by the army of 
Shalmaneser, and many of the cities 
had submitted to that monarch; but 
the Tyrian fleet gained a complete 
victory over the combined squadrons 
of the Assyrians and apostate Phoeni- 
cians, and though the island sustained 
a siege of five years, it remained un- 
subdued—Shalmaneser being obliged 
to raise the blockade. Menander, in 
Joseph. Antiq. 1x.14. By Nebuchad- 
nezzar, however, Insular Tyre was 
myn, violated. and subdued. Several 
MSS., the Alex. copy of the LXX., 
and the Arab., read jr na, “daughter 
of Zion ;” but obviously from the 
mistake of transcribers.—The latter 
half of the verse contains a predic- 
tion (couched, as frequently to ex- 
press certainty, in the form of the 
Imper.) of the flight of the Phceni- 
cians to the islands and countries of 
the Mediterranean, and the unsettled 
state in which they would find them- 
selves there. It has been doubted 
whether this refers to the troubles to 
which they would be subjected by the 
inhabitants of these regions, or to 
their being pursued thither and an- 
noyed by the Babylonians; Jer. xxv. 
22 decides in favour of the latter 
opinion. 


210 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XXIII. 


13 Behold the land of the Chaldeans! 


That people which was not, 


(Assyria assigned it to the inhabitants of the desert)— 
They have erected their towers ; 


13. Having described the author 
and effects of the calamity to be 
brought upon Tyre, the prophet now 
proceeds to describe the instruments 
by which it would be inflicted. In 
answer to an implied question—where 
is there a people to be found able to 
subdue the strongly fortified, opulent, 
and populous mart of nations? he 
points to the Chaldeans, and shews 
that though insignificant and despic- 
able, and dependent for a territory 
upon others, yet they would advance 
with a formidable apparatus, and lay 
her in the dust. D'TH2, OPT TM, and oy, 
are in apposition, and supply the nomi- 
natives to the following verbs.—The 
ow2, Chasdim, Chaldeans, as a tribe, 
were of great antiquity. They are 
supposed to have sprung from 13, the 
son of Nahor, brother to Abraham, 
whose native place was O'w32 ὌΝ, Ur of 
the Chasdim, and originally to have in- 
habited the northern part of Mesopo- 
tamia and the Carduchian mountains 
adjacent to Armenia. But the name 
is traceable still farther back ; for it 
forms one of the components of T0275, 
Ar-phaxad, (Araph-CHESED,) the name 
of the third son of Shem, Gen. x. 22, 
&c. from whom the Chesed mentioned 
Gen. xxii. 22, was himself descended. 
In the earliest notice which we have 
of them in a tribal state, Job i. 17, 
they appear as addicted to a wild and 
predatory mode of life. Jeremiah, v. 
15, speaks of them as DYY9 "2, ax 
ancient nation, but evidently in the 
laxer acceptation of that term, so that 
there is no real contradiction between 
his statement and that made by Isaiah 
in the present verse. Of the circum- 
stances connected with their settle- 
ment in Babylonia we are totally 
ignorant. Most probably they had 
lands assigned them in reward of 
certain services rendered to the king 
of Assyria, on which occasion they 
changed their wild and roving habits, 
by which they more resembied wild 
beasts (0%) than men, for those of a 


civilized organization. That it was 
the portion of Chaldzeans who lived in 
Mesopotamia that were thus located, 
may be gathered from the fact, that 
Xenophon and Strabo speak of Chal- 
deeans, in their time, inhabiting the 
mountains near Armenia and Colchis, 
of which the present Kurds are very 
likely the descendants. The period of 
their location must have been shortly 
before Isaiah wrote. Gesenius thinks 
it not improbable that it is to be dated 
from the commencement of the era of 
Nabonassar, B.C. 747; otherwise called 
the era of the Chaldeans. By 1x we 
are not, with Lowth, to understand a 
king of the name of Ashur, but as 
usual, Assyria, or the Assyrians. In 
the course of time, the Chaldeans 
acquired very considerable influence 
in the empire, and ultimately, under 
Nabopollassar, B.c. 597, asserted their 
independence. That prince, contract- 
ing an alliance with Cyaxares, king of 
the Medes, conquered Assyria, and 
reducing Nineveh its capital, trans- 
ferred the seat of empire to Babylon; 
whence, under his son Nebuchadnezzar, 
the powerful army went forth, which 
conquered Judea, Phoenicia, and Egypt. 
The Chaldzan rule terminated with 
Belshazzar, when Babylonia became a 
Persian province,and afterwardsshared 
the fate of the Persian empire.—j x, 
land, is here used in the proper accep- 
tation of country, place of location, 
and not of people, as Gesenius erro- 
neously interprets. This the use of 
the verb 1% clearly proves. Indeed, 
he is obliged to allow that this signi- 
fication attaches to it, as implied in 
the suffix 7. Dry ΠῚ is employed, 
δεικτικῶς : this is the people, the very 
people which, notwithstanding their 
not being found in the list of nations 
or empires, Jehovah hath purposed to 
use as his instruments in destroying 
the mighty Tyre—o»s; deserticola, 
such as live in rude and uncultivated 
regions. The term is used both of 
wild beasts and human beings; see 


‘ 


CHAP. XXIII.] 


ISATAH, 


211 


They have demolished her palaces ; 


They have made her a ruin. 


14 Howl, ye ships of Tarshish, 


For your stronghold is laid waste. 


15 


And it shall come to pass in that day, 


That Tyre shall be forgotten seventy years, 


Like the days of a king ; 


At the end of seventy years there shall be to Tyre 
As it were the song to a harlot. 


16 
Thou harlot forgotten ! 


Strike skilfully the chords ; 


Take the harp; go about the city, 


sing many songs, 


"Τὴ order that thou mayest be remembered! 
17 For it shall be at the end of seventy years, 


note to chap. xiii. 21. It is to be 
taken here in the latter sense, as 
descriptive of the rude and unculti- 
vated condition of the Chaldzeans pre- 
vious to their settlement in Babylonia. 
—The Mas. affix in yp7a belongs to 
a», the people, i.e. the Chaldzeans; and 
the Fem. affix in P2728 and ANY, to 
Tyre understood. pa, Keri }73, az 


artificial mound or fort. Arab. ws 


arena accumulata, what is raised, either 
for the purpose of serving as a watch- 
tower, or for the purpose of attacking 
a city during a siege. Comp. }13, chap. 
xxxli. 14, Such the Chaldean army 
would throw up on their arrival before 
Tyre, and thence annoy the inhabit- 
ants. mis, high and noble buildings, 


palaces, from ὉΠ πε ον, Arab. use to 


raise, be high,—not harems, as Mi- 
chaelis conjectured. Ὑ is the Poel of 
vw, to make naked, bare, demolish, &c., 
rather than from Ὃν, ¢o wake, wake up. 
Those who prefer the latter derivation, 
refer the action to the excitement of 
rebellion in the palaces of Tyre, by 
which her strength would be weak- 
ened; but the former seems the more 
natural construction. So Rosenmiiller, 
Gesenius, Maurer, and Scholz. The 
proper nomin. to 72 is OY, taken as a 
collective. The meaning of the whole 
verse is briefly this: the Chaldeans, 
formerly barbarous and unknown as a 


state, but established in Babylon by 
the Assyrians, shall besiege Tyre, 
storm her palaces, and reduce her to 
ruin. Comp. Hab. i. 6—11. 

14, Here the first part of the pro- 
phecy terminates, and that for the 
most part in the same words with 
which it commenced, ver. 1. 

15—17. The prophet specifies the 
length of the period during which 
Tyre should remain in a state of deso- 
lation and neglect. Most interpreters 
regard the seventy years as those 
during which the Jews were to be in 
captivity, at the expiration of which, 
not only were they to be restored to 
their own land, but the Babylonian 
yoke being broken, Tyre and the 
neighbouring states should also be at 
liberty to resume their former mer- 
cantile occupations: The only real 
difficulty in the verse is created by 
the words 78 722", commonly ren-) 
dered, as the days of one king. This 
difficulty appears to have presented 
itself to the LXX. who translate: ws 
χρύνος βασιλέως, ὡς χρόνος ἀνθρώπου, 
adding the latter words by way of 
explanation, but in reality not render- 
ing the passage at all clearer. To refer 
the words to the period of Nebuchad- 
nezzar’s life or reign seems altogether 
unwarrantable ; as, indeed, it likewise 
does to understand by 779, not a king, 
but ἃ singdom or dynasty. Equally 
objectionable is the solution proposed 


212 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP, XXIII. 


That Jehovah shall visit Tyre ; 
And she shall return to her hire, 
And play the harlot with all the kingdoms of the earth, 
That are on the surface of the ground. 
18 But her gain and her hire shall be holy to Jehovah ; 
It shall not be stored up, nor hoarded ; 
But her gain shall be for those who dwell before Jehovah, 


by Hensler, who considers 778 to be 
used here as an ordinal, and the phrase 
to signify the first king, just as We DY 
signifies the first day, Gen. i. 5. The 
only way of untying the knot is to 
take 178 as equivalent to our indefinite 
article. Thus, as 7x Ὁ, “a basket,” 
Ex. xxix. 3; 1x wx, “aman,” 1 Sam. i. 
1; ΠΝ >x,“@ ram,” Dan. viii. 3; so our 
text will simply read, “like the days of 
a king:” i.e. forgotten. It is notorious 
matter of observation, that, generally 
speaking, no persons are sooner con- 
signed to oblivion than monarchs, even 
the most powerful and illustrious. 
Take, for example, Napoleon, whose 
name, after the lapse of little more 
than twenty years, is scarcely ever 
mentioned. In like manner, during the 
period specified, Tyre should be for- 
gotten. No mention would be made 
of her glory. However, at the end of 
that period, it is predicted that she 
should again bestir herself, and engage 
in foreign commerce as in former days. 
This commerce or intercourse with 
foreign nations, the prophet compares 
to that of a harlot with her lovers. 
Comp. Nah. iii. 4; Rev. xviii. 3. She 
would now make use of every art by 
which to bring herself again into 
notice.—737 NV, is the genitive of 
object, and must be rendered, the song 
to an harlot, as the connexion obviously 
demands. This ditty follows in the 
16th verse, the language of which is 
peculiarly terse and appropriate. It 
is a song of taunt or satire—As the 
destruction of Tyre is ascribed to 
Jehovah, so her future prosperity is 
attributed to the kindness of his 
providence. The term 72x, Aire, refers 
to the comparison, ver. 15, but is 
explained ver. 18, by "0, commercial 
gain. Root 2A, to give presents. The 
7 in ΠΡ has the Mappic in a great 
number of MSS.—The apparent pleon- 


asm at the end of ver. 17 is designed 
to express the great extent to which 
the trade of Tyre should again be 
carried on; which took place especially 
under the Seleucide and the Romans. 
She had indeed so far recovered her 
ancient power in the time of Alex- 
ander the Great, that, though at last 
taken by that conqueror, she held out 
a siege of seven months. The number 
of her inhabitants must then have 
amounted to at least thirty thousand. 

18. A prediction of the conversion 
of the Tyrians to the worship and 
service of the true God. Instead of 
hoarding up their gains, or devoting 
them as presents to the temple of 
Hercules, as they had formerly done, 
they would now consecrate them to 
the support of true religion. Comp. 
Ps. Ixxxvii. 4; Isa. lx. 9. Whether 
they became proselytes to the Jewish 
faith, we are not informed; though, 
considering the number of Jews who 
resided in foreign cities after the 
return from the captivity, it is not at 
all unlikely that many were led to 
profess it through their instrumen- 
tality; in which case, they would 
naturally send gifts to Jerusalem. 
That they embraced Christianity at an 
early period, and that it afterwards 
flourished here, are matters of history, 
Euseb, Hist. lib. x. cap. 4; and it is 
not improbable, that to this the pro- 
phecy refers. Comp. Acts xxi. 3—6. 
mm 269 Dw, “those who sit or dwell 
before Jehovah,” is equivalent to 3Ὸν 
jes, “the inhabitants of Zion,” when 
used figuratively to denote the mem- 
bers of the church of God, Ps. xxvii. 
4, Ixxxiv. 4; only with special refer- 
ence to the Divine presence. That 
the priests are intended, is maintained 
by Hitzig and Maurer, and in part by 
Rosenmiiller; but it does not appear 
that they were ever permitted to sit 


CHRP: KOT. 


ISAIAH. 


213 


For food in abundance, and for splendid attire. 


in the presence of God. The phrase 
denotes constancy and diligence in the 
service of the Lord. About twelve 
of Kennicott and De Rossi’s MSS. 
read ΓΊΝΩ" 7172, but most likely from 


an emendation. ny several of the 
ancient translators have taken in the 
sense of being o/d; Aquila has perdp- 
σεως; but the Chald. WW, which is 
glorious, gives the right meaning. 


CHAPTER XXIV. 


That chapters xxiv.—xxvii. form one connected whole, is the unanimous 


opinion of the best commentators. 


They describe the desolations brought 


upon Palestine, as a punishment for the sins of its inhabitants; contain 
predictions of the restoration of the Jews from captivity, and of the gospel 
dispensation; hymns of grateful praise for their deliverance; and announce 


the utter destruction of their enemies. 


Vitringa, Michaelis, and others, 


regard this section as the most obscure and difficult in the whole book. It 
may therefore naturally be supposed that considerable diversity of opinion 


has obtained with respect to its interpretation. 
applied it to judgments to be brought upon the earth generally. 


Most of the Reformers 
Hitzig is 


almost alone in the opinion that it refers to the Assyrian empire, and the 


destruction of Nineveh, its capital. 


By Grotius, it is applied to the deso- 


lations effected by Shalmaneser; by Hensler, to those which took place 
under Sennacherib; by Dathe, Gesenius, Rosenmiiller, and Jahn, to the 
devastations of Nebuchadnezzar, and the fall of Babylon; by Vitringa, to 


the times of the Maccabees. 


Lowth and some other late writers think the 


prophecy embraces all the desolations of Palestine,—the last, or Roman, not 
excepted. This hypothesis, though supplying an easy mode of interpreting 
all its parts, is to be rejected ; having obviously been framed for the purpose 
of getting rid of the difficulties. If we consider it in the light of a prophetic 
review of the judgments brought upon the land, more especially those 
brought upon it by the Chaldeans, down to the time of the Messiah, we 
shall, I think, come nearest the mark. That it has any reference to times 


yet future, I cannot find. 


That Isaiah was the writer of this portion of the book, there is no just reason 
to doubt. The objections taken by Eichhorn, Gesenius, Hitzig, and Maurer, 
are for the most part extremely frivolous. That chap. xxiv. abounds more 
in paronomasias, and other points of artificial style, than the rest of the 
book, cannot be denied; but these the Hebrews accounted elegancies, rather 
than blemishes, and they are not without their parallels, both in Isaiah and 
his contemporary Micah. See chap. v. 7, vii. 9, xxii. 17, 18. Equally 
futile are the alleged doctrinal difficulties, especially that of the resurrection 


of the dead. 


See on chap. xxiv. 21, xxvi. 19. While Gesenius denies that 


DD 


214 ISATAH. [CHAP, XXIV. 


this section is from the pen of Isaiah, but contends that he is the author 
of chap. xxiii, Hitzig strenuously maintains an identity of authorship ; 
though he refers the composition of both to the times, if not to the pen of 
Nahum. 

In this chapter the prophet depicts in the strongest colours the distress that 
should prevail in the land, to heighten which he accumulates particulars, 
1—12; the grateful feelings of the few inhabitants that should make their 
escape to the regions on the Mediterranean, 13—16; the complete subver- 
sion of the Jewish polity by the army of Nebuchadnezzar, and the captive 
state of the priests and royal family, 16—22; and concludes by announcing 
the restoration of the Jews, and the glorious re-establishment of the 


theocracy, 23. 


1 Brnoxp, Jehovah poureth out the land and emptieth it ; 
He also turneth down the face of it, and scattereth its 


inhabitants. 


2 And it is, as with the people, so with the priest ; 
As with the servant, so with his master ; 
As with the maid, so with her mistress ; 
As with the buyer, so with the seller ; 
As with the lender, so with the borrower ; 
As with the receiver, so with the giver on usury. 

3 The land is utterly emptied and utterly plundered ; 
For Jehovah hath spoken this word. 


1. The four verbs here employed 
are all strongly expressive of violence. 
P23, to empty, pour out violently, Arab. 


5.» multum pluvie fudit ccclam. 4843 


tmpetus, illapsusque vehementior. ci 


nultiloguus, garrulus vir.—p?2 signifies 
to open, empty as a bottle, and is nearly 
synonymous with the former word. 


Arab. ce, aperuit omnino vel vehemen- 
ter ; abriputt. ah, desertum, solitudo. 


LXX. épnpdca.—my, to turn xpside 
down, overthrow. The entire reference 
seems to be to a vessel, the contents 
of which are poured out, and which, 
in order to its being wholly emptied, 
is turned completely over. Comp. 
Jer. xlviii. 11, 12. 

2, This accumulation of antitheses 
is quite in keeping with the impas- 
sioned character of the style through- 


out the chapter. They strikingly 
mark the indiscriminate ruin in which 
the inhabitants of Judah should be 
involved. No distinction would be 
made between the different ranks or 
conditions of life. That no historical 
inference is to be drawn from the 
priest, and not the king being men- 
tioned, is evident from Hos. iv. 9, 
where the same antithesis occurs, in 
application to the state of things in 
Israel.—Instead of 3, which appears 
before all the other predicates, δ 
takes x3, because, with 2 following, 
it exhibits its verbal, rather than its 
substantive character. Many of the 
best codices, and several of the earlier 
editions, read 7) instead of πῶ, Both 
letters are elsewhere in use. 

3. Pia and 37 are emphatic Infini- 
tives, from p72 and 3; the resump- 
tion of the former of which, from ver. 
1, connects these two verses closely 
together. The formula with which 


CHAP. XXIV. | 


ISATAH. 


215 


4 The land mourneth, it withereth ; 
The world languisheth, it withereth ; 
The highest of the people of the land languish. 
5 Yea, the land [itself] is profaned under its inhabitants ; 
For they have transgressed the laws; they have changed the 


statutes ; 


They have broken the everlasting covenant. 
6 Therefore a curse devoureth the land, 
And its inhabitants are punished ; 
Therefore the inhabitants of the land are burnt up; 


the verse concludes is usual with the 
prophets, and expresses the certainty 
of the events predicted. 

4, yoxt and °2n are synonymes, and 


both are here employed to designate. 


the land of Judah. Comp. chap. xiil. 
11, where 529 is used of the Baby- 
lonian world; ἡ οἰκουμένη, Orbis Ro- 
manus, Acts xvii. 6, xxiv. 5; and Luke 
ii.1; Acts xi. 28, (see Bloomfield,) 
where it is used of Palestine. Comp. 
also chap. xxvi.18. The paronomasias 
in the first four verses are merely a 
prelude to the more striking ones, 
vers. 17—20. Both 5328 and %2) are 
properly used of the drooping or fall- 
ing of plants, leaves, &c. ; here figu- 
ratively of the languishing condition 
of the Jewish state. INT Dy DV, Lit. 
the height of the people of the land ; 01, 
the abstract for the concrete 9), ez- 
celsi, the most exalted in power and 
dignity; LXX. of ὑψηλοὶ τῆς γῆς. 
Nebuchadnezzar carried into captivity 
two thousand of the nobles and men 
of wealth. These are specially singled 
out, on account of their more aggra- 
vated guilt. 

5. Ys is here to be taken of ἐλ land 
literally and, in such connexion, with 
the article—the very land, the land 
itself. Because the prophet speaks of 
min, Jaws, and not 77, the law, Aben- 
ezra, Vitringa, Rosenmiiller, Hitzig, 
and some others, are of opinion that 
the reference is not to the Mosaic 
institute, but to what are called the 
laws of nature. The latter commen- 
tators imagine that the Noachic pre- 
cepts, covenant, &c. are meant. But 
for the use of the plural, in application 
to the law of Moses, see Levit. xxvi. 


46; Neh. ix. 13; Ezek. xliv. 24. in, 
the singular, is found in one of De 
Rossi’s MSS., the Soncin. edit. of the 
Prophets, 1486, and is supported by 
the LXX., Chald., Syr., and Arab. ; 
but the plural, being the more diffi- 
cult, is in all probability the true 
reading. ΓΤ is here a collective, sta- 
tutes; UXX. τὰ προστάγματα. ™3 
div, the Sinaic covenant, which is fre- 
quently thus designated, because of 
the long period during which its obli- 
gations were to be binding. Exod. 
xxxi. 16; Lev. xxiv. 8. 


6. mos, Arab. δ}, juramentum, pri- 
TT) J 2 Ρ 


marily denotes az oath, and then the 
penalty incurred by the breach of it ; the 
mulet, damage, or suffering, to which 
the offending party is subject. See 
Deut. xxix. 13 (14)—19, where it 
occurs in connexion with m3, It is 
here specifically the curse, or ban 
annexed to the violation of the Sinaic 
covenant. See Deut. xxix. 18, 19; 
comp. Zech. v. 3. The judgments 
which God would bring upon the 
country were an infliction of the 
threatened punishment.—odwtx denotes, 
in such connexion, to suffer the con- 
sequences of guilt, fo be punished ; 


Arab. ra , criminis reus. Comp. Zech. 


xi. 5.—For 19, which is from 9, fo 
burn, be burnt up, consumed, Houbigant 
proposes to read 24, which Lowth 
adopts, and renders, “are destroyed ;” 
but totally without authority—there 
being no various reading. Besides, 
the verb found in the text better 
accords with 52s in the corresponding 
parallelism.—* Few men.” On the 


216 ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XXIV. 


And few are the men that are left. 


7 The new wine mourneth, 
The vine languisheth ; 
All the merry-hearted sigh. 
8 The joy of tabrets ceaseth ; 


The noise of those who exult is ended ; 


The joy of the harp ceaseth. 


9 They drink not wine with the song ; 

The strong liquor is become bitter to those who drank it. 
10 ‘The city of desolation is broken in pieces ; 

Every house is shut up; there is no entrance. 
11 A ery for wine is in the streets ; 


All gladness is set ; 

The joy of the land is gone. 
12 Desolation is left in the city, 

And the gate is battered into 
13. Yet it shall be in the earth, 

In the midst of the people, 


capture of Jerusalem, none were left 
behind but the lower class of citizens 
and the country people; but even 
they were afterwards carried into cap- 
tivity by Nebuzaradan, so that the 
land remained for the most part unin- 
habited. But see ver. 13. 

7. DIVA, must, new wine, corresponds 
to 82, the vine, following, and must 
therefore be understood of the juice 
while yet in the grape. Comp. chap. 


DB * 
Ixv. 8; Syr. [sams frumentum. The 


same figures are employed by Joel, i. 
10—12, where they are carried more 
fully out. That Isaiah imitated Joel 
is asserted, but not attempted to be 
proved, by Gesenius. 

8. Three of De Rossi’s Codices, the 
LXX., and Arab., read να, instead of 
yw. The latter, however, besides 
being the better supported, is the 
more appropriate reading of the two. 

10. ὙΠ MD, the city of desolation, 1.6. 
destined to lie desolate and waste, 
during the captivity. Such would be 
the quantity of rubbish collected be- 
fore the houses that were left, that 
they would be quite inaccessible. 2D 
is used not only of men, but of things ; 
as the wilderness, Exod. xiv. 3. For 


ruins. 


the meaning of x12, see chap. xvii. I, 
Ext. 1. 

11. The cry for wine here mentioned 
does not refer to the clamorous 
demand of drunkards, but to the des- 
titute condition of the wounded and 
languishing inhabitants. 2, which 
is used of the setting of the sun, 
Arab. κ-Ὁ 255, abitt, procul abiit, recessit, 


occidit sol, hence 2, evening, is here 
with great effect employed metaphor- 
ically to express the disappearance of 
every species of joy. 22 properly 
signifies to go into captivity. Both 
terms describe the total change that 
would take place in the circumstances 
of the inhabitants. % is inserted 
before IST, in xize of Kennicott and 
De Rossi’s MSS.; and, according to 
the LXX. and Arab., it ought to be 
before wiv, It is most likely in 
both cases a repetition from the first 
part of the verse. 

12. we) forms an antithesis to the 
preceding. The gates of cities were 
well fortified. When laid in ruins, 
as here expressed, there was no more 
defence. το may either have ? un- 
derstood, or be the accusative. 

13. Comp. chap. xvii. 6. 


\ 


| DM, maritime countries ; 


CHAP. XXIV. | 


As when the olive is shaken ; 


ISATAH. 


217 


Like the gleanings when the vintage is finished. 
14 They shall lift up their voice, they) shall sing ; 
Because of the majesty of Jehovah they shall shout aloud from 


the sea. 


15 Wherefore glorify Jehovah in the regions of fire, 
In the isles of the sea, the name of Jehovah, the God of Israel. 


14. Some, as Dathe, take the Ὁ in 
mo to be comparative, and render, 
“shout more than the sea ;” but as 
the shout in this place is that of joy, 
it is contrary to usage, as it is un- 
natural, to compare it to the roaring 
of the sea. It is rather the local Ὁ, 
indicating the residence of the persons 
spoken of ;'as in M190, DIP, in the east. 
By &, the sea, is meant the Mediter- 
ranean, or the West; Jew. Span. de 
Occidente ; i.e. the islands of Greece, 
and the countries in Asia Minor, 
Europe, and Africa, which lay on the 
coasts of that sea. To these quarters 
some of the Jews doubtless made 
their escape by means of Pheenician 
vessels, and thus retained their per- 
sonal liberty, while their brethren 
were captives in Babylon.—In this 
and the two following verses, the 
prophet abruptly breaks off from his 
description of the desolations to be 
brought upon his country, in order 
for a moment to introduce the joy of 
the exiled Jews of the West at the 
capture of Babylon by Cyrus, which 
he anticipates. The Tym }ix3, Majesty 
of Jehovah, which they celebrate, is 
the glorious manifestation of his 
power and goodness in destroying the 
enemies and effecting the rescue of 
the nation. 

15. Various interpretations have 
been given of O83, The conjectural 
emendations may be seen in Lowth. 
Of these, were any of them necessary, 
that to be preferred is undoubtedly 
but the cir- 
cumstance that while no Heb. MS. 
exhibits this reading, D%»~3, the full 
orthography, as found in a great num- 
ber of codices, as well as in the Bible 
and the Prophets printed at the 
Soncin. press, clearly evinces, that, 
instead of the » having been com- 


\ muted for », the latter has a right to 


maintain its place in the word. Still, 
however, this conjecture, which Lowth 
first adopted, is approved by Michae- 
lis, Hitzig, and some others. Ge- 
senius, on the other hand, Scholz, 
and others, render, ix the East, the 
ORIENT, ὁ.6. the regions of light, or 
the countries over which the morning 
sun rises in brightness. They con- 
sider D 8 and ὈΝΤ ἫΝ as contrasted, 
and marking the different regions 
both in the East and the West in 
which the shouts of praise were to 
be raised to Jehovah. That regions 
are meant, the parallelism plainly 
shews ; but there is something ex- 
tremely harsh in the introduction of 
the Orient into the passage: the 
“sea,” and “the islands of the sea,” 
i.e. the West, being mentioned both 
before and after, requires that we 
look in the same direction for the 
countries intended by the prophet. 
If we change the rendering of our 
common version, “ ¢he fires, into the 
regions of fire, We shall, in my opinion, 
hit the mark. Such regions have, 
from time iminemorial, existed in 
Sicily, the south of Italy, and other 
parts on the Mediterranean ; and the 
Phenician traders, who must fre- 
quently have witnessed volcanic erup- 
tions of Etna, Vesuvius, ὅσο. could not 
fail to spread throughout the East 
information respecting these extra- 
ordinary phenomena of nature. Comp. 
Jer. li. 25, 26; Nah. i. 5, 6; where 
the imagery is taken from the pheno- 
mena of volcanoes ; a proof that they 
were not unknown to the sacred pen- 
men. I consider the prophet to be 
addressing, throughout the verse, 
those Jews who had taken refuge in 
the West, the following ™7 »s being 
only an amplification of the idea 
suggested by ΘΝ. The marginal ren- 
dering, “valleys,” which is that adopted 


218 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XXIV. 


16 From the end of the earth, we hear songs: 


Glory to the Righteous One! 


But I said, Misery to me! Misery to me! Alas for me! 
The plunderers plunder; yea, the plunder the plunderers 


plunder. 


17 Terror, and the pit, and the snare, 
Ave upon thee, O inhabitant of the earth. 


18 And it shall be, 


That whoso fleeth from the sound of the terror shall fall into 


the pit : 


in the French, Dutch, German, and 
other current modern versions, is 
borrowed from the Rabbins, who 
generally give it this signification, 
but without any support from the 
connexion, 

16. The first clause of this verse is 
a continuation of the preceding sub- 
ject, and contains a prediction of 
the joy with which the Jews that 
were dispersed in distant parts would 
hail the appearance of Cyrus ; here, 
as in chap. xli. 2, called the Righteous. 
See on that passage. But no sooner 
has the prophet pointed to the de- 
liverer, than he is struck with horror 
at the prospect of the evils which 
should previously overtake his coun- 
trymen. He sees the repeated and 
unmitigated ravages of the Chaldeans, 
and gives expression to his feelings in 
language the most impassioned and 
affecting. In such ἃ "βία of mind 
abrupt sentences and repetitions are 
extremely natural ; and even parono- 
masias are not out of place, if the 
terms employed be appropriate to 
the subject. Accordingly, we have 
here ὁ ‘¥1. repeated ; as is the verb 733, 
with the substantive 123, not fewer 
than five times within the compass 
of a single verse. In vers. 17 and 18, 
m1 71 179, with their separate repeti- 
tion, furnish an elegant instance of 
paronomasia, while the reduplicate 
and intensive forms of the verbs YY, 
“1B, wi, Di, vers. 19, 20, and the repe- 
tition of D9, and 27x, ver. 21, give 
peculiar force and pathos to the pas- 
sage. Altogether, it is the most length- 
ened specimen of varied artificial com- 
position found in the Hebrew Scrip- 


tures, or, perhaps, in any other writ- 
ings. For a similar though brief in- 
stance of highly artificial language, 
composed under circumstances of 
severe affliction, see Job xvi. 12. 


DT bs 
Ὁ ΞΒΞΘῊ PIA Ty 


As a parallel to ΝῊ Δ, comp. 
the Orestes of Eurip. : 


Αἴλινον Athwov ἄρχαν θανάτου, 
᾿ Βάρβαροι λεγοῦσιν Αἴ, Αἴ, κιτιλ. 


ἜΝ a subst. after the form 29, 2, from 


the root 77, Arab. Ι; : sis’ deminuit 


rem ; & i> afflictio, erumna, calamitas. 


The Syr., Targ., Aq., Theod., Symm., 
Vulg., render, my secret; and some, 
adopting this rendering, would inter- 
pret the words, “my secret is to my- 
self ;” 2.6. a secret is revealed to me, 
but I am not at liberty to divulge it ; 
but the ὁ Ὁ which follows requires 
us to take the word in the sense of 
misery, affliction, or such like. Gesenius, 
Ich vergehe, ich vergehe: Uitzig and 
Scholz, Lend mir! elend mir! The 
prophet gives vent to the deeply pain- 
ful feelings which affected his mind. 
For the signification of 723, see chap. 
xxi. 2, where, as here, the prophet 
combines the verb and the participle. 

17,18. The language of these verses 
is adopted with little variation by 
Jeremiah, chap. xlviil. 43, 44, in his 
prophecy against Moab. It graphically 
describes the accumulation of dangers 
to which the inhabitants of Judah 


CHAP. ΧΧΙΥ.] 


ISAIAH. 


219 


And whoso cometh up from the midst of the pit, shall be taken 


in the snare ; 


For the windows of heaven are opened, 
And the foundations of the earth do shake. 


19 The land is violently broken; 
The land is greatly shattered ; 
The land totters exceedingly. 


20 


The land reeleth like one who is drunk, 


And moveth to and fro like a hammock : 
For her rebellion lieth heavy upon her; 
She shall also fall, and shall rise no more. 


should be exposed, and the impossi- 
bility of successful escape. The images, 
as Lowth observes, are taken from 
hunting. The 15 was the formido, or 
scare-crow, which partly by its appear- 
ance, and partly by its noise, (,) 
frightened the animals into the covered 
pit-falls that had been dug for them ; 
or, failing this, into a large space of 
ground enclosed with zefs, which being 
drawn narrower and narrower, at last 
caught them, There is no necessity, 
with Gesen., to refer 7? to the hunter ; 
or, with Lowth, to regard 779 as a 
mere Hebraism, which cannot be sus- 
tained. The various reading, ΞΕ, is 
obviously a correction from Jeremiah. 
The language is otherwise proverbial, 
like the Latin : incidit in Scyllam, qui 
vult vitare Charybdim.— pr? is freq. 
only equivalent to }2; which one 
MS. has, most probably from Jeremiah, 
and is the rendering of the LXX., Syr., 
and Vulg.—The Ὁ in 01199 is a peri- 
phrasis for the Genitive. The word 
is otherwise used instead of DY2u07, 
Gen. vii. 11, which passage the pro- 
phet had in his eye—comparing the 
desolation to be brought upon his 
people to that effected by the deluge. 
Some few codices have O77, doubt- 
less from emendation; LXX. ἐκ τοῦ 
οὐρανοῦ ; Targ. 8202; both giving the 
meaning, though not the form of the 
term. I have taken the same liberty 
here and at ver. 21—our word heaven 
corresponding etymologically both to 
Din and ow. 

19, 20. See on ver. 16. The conjec- 
ture of Secker, that the 7 in ὙΠ has 


been prefixed by some copyist repeat- 
ing this letter from the end of the 
preceding word, is extremely probable. 
The triple repetition of YX, so far 
from destroying the effect of the pas- 
sage, aS Gesenius insinuates, greatly 
increases its force; and as to the anti- 
climax referred to by Hitzig, it exists 
only in his own imagination; for 
whatever may be the comparative de- 
grees in meaning which attach to the 
verbs, taken by themselves, there is 
unquestionably a rise in the sense as 
we approach the end of the passage. 
First, there is Tying my, a violent 
crashing or breaking of such objects 
as are on the surface of the earth. 
Secondly, 7Mian7 Hs, a still more im- 
petuous destruction of them. Then 
we have ΠΡΌΣ win, yon yin, and 
mr; all of which describe the 
motion of the earth itself, tottering to 
utter ruin. And, to crown the whole, 
she at last falls under the pressure of 
accumulated guilt, to rise no more. 
Nothing can surpass in beauty the 
comparison of the globe, in such cir- 
cumstances, to 7299, a covered bed, or 
hammock, suspended between the bran- 
ches of a tree, liable to be tossed 
hither and thither in a storm, to the 
no small peril of its inhabitant. Such 
hammocks are common in the East, 
for the accommodation of those who 
watch fields or vineyards; as afford- 
ing shelter from the wild beasts. 
Comp. chap. i. 8. The term corre- 


sponds to the Arab. J; 2, locus, quem in 


summa arbore sibi struit campi custos pre 


220 
21 And it shall be in that day, 


ISAIAH. 


(CHAP. XXIV. 


That Jehovah shall punish the host of heaven on high, 
And the kings of the land upon the land. 
22 Yea, they shall be gathered in company, 
Like prisoners consigned to the pit ; 
And shall be shut up in the prison ; 
But after many days shall they be visited. 
23 The moon shall be confounded and the sun ashamed, 


metu leonis. Kam. Dj. which word the 
Targ.and Syr.and Saadias have adopted. 
See Buxtorf, Lex. Chald. p. 1670. 

21, 22. Misled by the force of the 
imagery employed in the preceding 
verses, and by a false construction of 
certain terms in these, Jerome refers 
the whole to the end of the world, the 
final judgment, and the punishment 
of the rebel angels; but he is rather 
puzzled how to meet the argument of 
the Origenists, derived, on this view 
of the passage, from the end of ver. 
22. Gesenius, however, adopts the 
same view, which he lamely endeavours 
to support from passages 1n the Zenda- 
vesta, the Book of Enoch, and 2 Pet. 
ii. 4; Jude 6; Matt. xxv.; Rev. xx. 
Michaelis broaches some curious no- 
tions respecting demons, tutelary 
angels, and stars, which are partly 
retailed by Rosenmiiller and Hitzig. 
The πρῶτον Ψεῦδος of all such inter- 
pretation lies in taking the words x2¥ 
Di97 in a literal sense, whereas it is 
manifest from the connexion, they are 
to be understood figuratively. The 
phrase is clearly identical in meaning 
with DYwT Nix, Dan. viii. 10, the 
Levites, or ecclesiastical state, being in- 
tended. The.service which they per- 
formed in the tabernacle is expressly 
called siz, Numb. iv. 23, 35, 39, 43, 
which Gesenius not improperly ren- 
ders militia sacra; and the verb is 
likewise used to express the perform- 
ance of such service, Numb. iv. 23. 
What Isaiah, therefore, here predicts, 
is the subversion for a season of the 
entire Jewish polity, or the removal 
to Babylon both of those who mini- 
stered in the temple, and of the royal 
state. MINT 1270, the kings of the land, 
are not foreign rulers, such as the 
kings of Assyria, Babylon, &c., but 


the Jewish kings, as Zedekiah, Jehoi- 
achim, &c. See Jer. 111. See Lowth’s 
note, especially the extract from Sir 
Isaac Newton. Before VOX, which 
is a collective noun, supply 3, as freq. 
In the former of the two cases in 
which %Y is used, it expresses motion 
towards a place; in the latter, the 
being cz the place specified. 2a and 
"309 are parallel. The former is de- 
scriptive of the most ancient kinds of 
prisons, which consisted of empty 
cisterns that narrowed towards the 
mouth, so that it was scarcely possible 
for those who were confined in them 
to make their escape without assist- 
ance. Gen. xxxvii. 20, 22; Jer. xxxviii. 
13. Not unfrequently the bottom was 
covered with mire or soft clay, which 
rendered them at once unhealthy and 
disagreeable. Jer. xxxvii. 6. For the 
fulfilment, see 2 Kings xxv.; 2 Chron. 
xxxvi.; Jer. 111.-- 5, Lowth, Rosen- 
miiller, Gesenius, Maurer, and Scholz, 
take in the sense of punishing; but a 
merciful visitation, for the purpose of 
restoring those here spoken of from 
captivity, alone suits the connexion. 
Comp. chap. xxiii. 17. Thus the Syr., 
Rabbi Joseph, Kamchi, Jackson, Booth- 
royd. Hitzig defends this construction 
of the verb, though he differs as to the 
subject of the prophecy ; and Calvin is 
inclined to take the same view of it.— 
The phrase 0") 44, many days, does not 
necessarily imply a very long period 
of time, but may with all propriety 
be applied to the seventy years of the 
captivity. See Jer. xxxii. 14, where 
it is used in reference to this very 
period. 

23. What the prophet here adds 
confirms the view just given of the 
preceding clause. But the scene pre- 
sented to his vision is too glorious in 


CHAP. XXV.| 


ISAIAH. 


221 


When Jehovah of Hosts shall reign 
On Mount Zion and in Jerusalem, 


Gloriously before his elders. 


its character to admit of application 
to the state of the Jewish polity after 
the restoration. Not even the brilliant 
successes of the Maccabees, nor the 
state of affairs under the Asmonzan 
dynasty, at all come up to it. We 
must, therefore, regard it as another 
of those abrupt, though not uncon- 
nected, anticipations of the kingdom 
of Christ, which abound in this book. 
It describes times when neither kings 


nor priests should officially constitute _ 


part of the church of God: the only 
officers to be then recognised as bear- 
ing rule in that sacred community 
being D373, LXX., πρεσβύτεροι, preshyters 


or elders. See Acts xiv. 23; Tit. i. 5. 
That the sun and moon are not to be 
understood in this passage as specific 
symbols, but are merely introduced to 
set off by contrast the glorious splen- 
dour of Messiah’s reign, is admitted 
by the best interpreters. Comp. chap. 
lx. 1, 19, 20. For the meaning of 
Zion and Jerusalem, in this connexion, 
see Heb. xii. 22. 123, glory, is to be 
taken adverbially ; and connected with 
122, the preceding verb ;- δὰ Regnum 

hristi pertinere; quod sicut xox est 
de hoc mundo, ita ejus gloria, splendor, 
dignitas, et magnificentia, istaec omnia 
pudefieri facit et disparere.”—Forerius. 


CHAPTER XXV. 


This chapter commences with a triumphal song of praise to God, for his 
fidelity in accomplishing his promises in the destruction of the Babylonish 
power, by which his people had been oppressed, 1—5. The prophet then 
predicts the establishment of the new and universal economy, and the rich 
blessings which should accrue from that event, 6—8. He next introduces 
a beautiful chorus, in which expectant believers joyfully welcome the Divine 
Founder of the better dispensation, 9; and, in his usual style, reverts to 
judgments which should be inflicted on the Moabites,—the implacable ene- 
mies of the Jews,—during the period between the return from the captivity 


and the advent of Messiah, 10—12. 


1 O JEHOVAH, thou art my God ; 
I will exalt thee; I will praise thy name ; 
For thou hast effected wondrous things,— 


1. The language of this verse occurs, 
in part, on similar occasions of deliver- 
ance. See Exod. xv. 2,11; Ps. exviii. 
28, cxlv. 1. ΝΒ, rem mirabilem, as 
Kimchi gives it ; the wonderful inter- 


position of Divine Providence in ‘be- 
half of the Jews. nist) is frequently 
used of such interpositions. The use 
of p79, in a temporal sense, is_pecu- 
liar to Isaiah; see chap. xxi. 11, 


EE 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XXV. 


The ancient counsels are faithfulness and truth. 
2 For thou hast made the city a heap; 


The fortified city a ruin ; 


The palace of the barbarians to be no more a city: 


I: shall never be rebuilt. 


. 


3 Therefore shall the powerful people glorify thee ; 
The city of the formidable nations shall fear thee. 
4 For thou hast been a fortress to the poor ; 
A fortress to the needy in his distress ; 
A refuge from the storm; a shade from the heat ; 
When the blast of the formidable was like a storm against a 


wall. 


XXxvii. 26 ; and is equivalent to D2ir4, 
from eternity, eternal, ἸῸΝ TON, Hitzig 
considers to be governed by Mwy; but 
it is better to regard them as abstract 
nouns governed by the substantive 
verb understood. The same noun is 
sometimes repeated, in a different 
form or gender, with a view to express 
intensity, as TAD Moov, Ezek. vi. 14. 
moo WH, Job xxx. 3. The ellipsis of 
the copulative ) is an instance of the 
constructio asyndeta, of which Gese- 
nius gives several examples, Lehrg. p. 
842. The Divine counsels were proved 
by the event to be faithful and true. 

2. VY, City, is not used of any 
hostile city or cities in general, but 
specifically of Babylon, or the Chaldean 
power, by which the Jews had, been 
so long held in bondage. There is no 
occasion, with Houbigant, Lowth, and 
others, to change YY2 into VYY7,—the 
Ὁ denoting the material out of which 
anything ismade. The ὁ in 535 appears 
harsh in such close contact with 2; 
but it could not be omitted after or. 
The ancient versions may have read as 
we now do. Comp. Gen. 11], 19; Ps. 
xvi. 4. In the second instance, in 
which YY9 occurs here, it is privative 
in signification. For the change of 
om into oO}, Houbigant had no autho- 
rity; nor should we be warranted to 
alter the text for the sake of two MSS. 
in which the latter reading has since 
been found. ink is here used by 
synecdoche for YY; the palace being 
the principal part of the city. Com- 
pare, in illustration of the sense, chap. 
xiii, 19—22, 


3. By the “powerful people” are 
meant the Medes, Persians, &c. They 
are first spoken of in the singular, 
ww DY, as being united under the rule 
of Cyrus; and afterwards in the 
plural, Oy 0%3, to mark their diver- 
sity. The construction in Ὁ Mm}? 
PRY DW W, is, ad sensum : the grammar 
would require the verb to be in the 
sing. fem. to agree with ™?. Such 
would be the effect produced upon 
the minds of these warriors by the 
acknowledgment of the supremacy of 
Jehovah by Cyrus, Darius, &c. and 
the singular favour which they shewed 
the Jews, that they would be led to 
make the same acknowledgment, and 
ascribe to God the glory due to his 
name. See Ezrai. 2, 6; Dan. vi. 25— 
27. 

4, 3 connects what follows with 
ver. 1, and not with ver. 3. [Ὁ intro- 
duces an additional ground of praise 
to Jehovah,—the gracious preservation 
which he afforded to the Jews in Baby- 
lon. The images employed in this 
and the following verse possess great 
force and beauty. ™™ here signifies 
anger or wrath. See on chap. xxxii. 
11. By Ὃν 0%, ὦ wall-storm, is meant 
such a violent storm of wind and rain, 
as, beating against a stone wall, uproots 
and throws it prostrate on the ground, 
Root, 04, to pour, overwhelm; Arab. 


ti D.a. eu abrupit, C.a.; eu nomen 

uvit, qui infertur flumini Tigridi. Kam. 
q I. 

Freytag. The genitive is that of 


object; so that the 3, which Houbi- 
gant would introduce, is quite un- 


CHAP. XXYV.| 


5 As heat in a dry land, 


ISATAH, 


Thou hast subdued the tumult of the barbarians ; 
As heat by the shadow of a cloud, 
The song of the formidable is suppressed. 
6 In this mountain, Jehovah of Hosts shall prepare for all people, 
A feast of fat things, a feast of wine on the lees ; 


Of fat things full of marrow, 


necessary. Lud. Capellus, Vitringa, 
Lowth, Michaelis, and Dathe, render 
Y?, winter, by changing it into Vp; or 
by deriving it from Wp, fo be cold; but 
contrary to the unvarying usage of 
the language, in which 77 signifies a 
wall. 

5. The language is elliptical. After 
32 23, supply 3y 53 from the third 
member of the verse; and before 14 
in that line, supply 2 from the first, 
It would, however, be unwarrantable 
to alter the Hebrew text from its 
present elliptical forms. 72 is here 
used intransitively. Comp. chap. 
ΧΧΧΙ. 4. 

6. Having finished his song of tri- 
umph, Isaiah takes occasion, from the 
view he had just given of the Divine 
character, to call the attention of the 
Jews to a still more glorious display of 
that character, afforded by the rich 
supply of spiritual blessings which 
Jehovah would bestow in the days of 
Messiah. ‘These blessings are first 
represented under the image .of a 
sumptuous banquet; an image not 
unfrequently employed in Scripture to 
denote the means of spiritual enjoy- 
ment and nutrition. See Ps. xxii. 26 
—29; chap. lv. 1—5; Matt. vi. 11, 
xxii, 1—10; Luke xiii. 28, 29, xiv. 15 
—24; in all which passages there is 
the same distinct recognition of the 
calling of the Gentiles which we find 
in the present verse. The prophet 
then specifies the removal of ignorance, 
misery, and disgrace, as constituting 
the essential character of the blessings 
to be imparted. That the reference is 
to the happiness to be enjoyed under 
the reign of the Messiah, there can be 
no doubt. Comp., in connexion with 
the passages cited above, John vi. 53— 
58; 1 Cor. xv. 54. To no other state 
of things can the passage apply, than 
to one in which the privileges and 


of well-refined wine on the lees ; 


blessings of the gospel are prepared 
for men of all nations indiscrimi- 
nately: and which, in its consumma- 
tion, involves complete deliverance 
from every evil. Nothing can be more 
forced than the interpretation of some 
of the Rabbins, whom Grotius follows, 
according to which, the infliction of 
vengeance upon the external enemies 
of the church is meant.—i7 173, ie. 
Mount Sion, mentioned at the close of 
the preceding chapter, the new dis- 
pensation “beginning at Jerusalem.” 
D298 and OND form a paronomasia, 
which is heightened in effect by their 
repetition, and by the assimilation in 
form of the participles by which they 
are accompanied. “Fatness” is not 
confined by the Hebrews to animals, 
but is used of other subjects, the 
superior excellence of which they 
would express. Comp. however, τὰ 
σιτιστα, Matt. xxii. 4. OD 9%, lit. pre- 
servations, i.e. preservers, the lees, or 
sediment of wine produced by the 
bubbles of fixed air, which, during’ 
fermentation, rise to the surface, and 
bring along with them the skins, 
stones, or other grosser matters of the 
grapes ; thus forming a scum or spongy 
crust, which, after a time, breaks in 
pieces and falls to the bottom. When 
this has taken place, the wine becomes 
clear; but as the fermentation does 
not then cease, it increases in the 
excellence of its qualities, by being 
suffered still to continue for a time 
on the lees. See Lowth’s note; and 
comp. Jer, ΧΙ. 11. By metonymy 
of the cause for the effect, the word 
is here used to denote the excellent 
wines thus prepared by lengthened 
fermentation. To render them quite 
fit for use, they are purified by being 
filtered or drawn off from vessel to 
vessel. This is expressed by O72; 
the Pual Part. of px, fo fine, purify. 


224 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XXV. 


7 And He shall destroy in this mountain, 
The face of the covering which covereth all people, 
And the web that is woven over all nations. 
8 He shall utterly destroy death ; 
And the Lord Jehovah shall wipe away the tears from all faces, 


Comp. the Arab. (Ὁ 552 Pl. KGS, Vinum, 


Kamoos; from the skin in which it is 
kept. Such wine Pollux, in his Ono- 
mast., calls σακκίας οἶνος ὁ διῦλισμένος. 
Thus Aq. in the present case: πότον 
λιπασμάτων διῦλισμένον. OYMD, the 


other Part. from πῶ, Arab. t= 


ed 


emedullavit os, to draw the fat out of 
marrow-bones, is assimilated to the 
former, instead of being written, D172, 
which would be the regular form. Ὁ is 
the substitute of 4, the third radical. 
7. Rosenmiiller, Gesenius, Hitzig, 
and Scholz, make the covering here 
spoken of to be a sign of mourning ; 
but since the removal of mourning is 
specially predicted, ver. 8, it is better 
to interpret it of ignorance, as κάλυμμα, 
2 Cor. 111. 13, 14. With this igno- 
rance, as with a veil, all nations were 
covered at the time of our Lord’s 
advent, chap. ix. 2, xxix, 18, xlii. 7. 
Comp, Acts xvii. 30, xxvi. 18; Rom. 
i, 21; Eph, iv. 18. That the Jews 
themselves were likewise in a state of 
spiritual darkness, see John i. 5, iii. 
19, xii. 40. 0, cog, oxy, on2; Arab, 


LS, bl, LY, exit, operuit, velavit, oc- 


cultavit rem ; signifies to hide, muffle 
up, to throw a mantle or veil over one’s 
face ; hence 033, secretly ; 002, secret, 
hidden arts. The word occurs here 
first as a noun, and then as a parti- 
ciple ; only the proper participial form 
0} is changed into D1, to make it agree 
in sound with the noun. Critics have 
needlessly stumbled at wibt 5, “ the 
face of the covering.” Lowth and 
Boothroyd, after Houbigant, conjec- 
ture that 2» has been transposed, and 
that it stood originally before Oy» 53. 
In support of this conjecture, the 
MS. Bodl. is adduced ; but its reading 
is itself, in all probability, a mere 
conjectural emendation. At all events, 
the text, as read by all the ancient 


translators, was as we now have it ; 
and however harsh it may seem, to 
speak of destroying the face of a 
covering, we meet with a similar 
phrase, Job x1.13 (Hebr. xi. 5): 28 752 "2 
yw), “Who can uncover the face of 
his garment?” It is in fact merely a 
periphrasis for the thing itself, see 
chap. iii. 15; Ps. xlii. 11 (Hebr. 12). 22, 
the other verb here employed, usually 
signifies to pour out as a libation ; to 
Suse, cast as metal; but in this place 
the idea seems to be that which 


attaches to the Arab. μανοῦ» fecuit, 


plecuit quid, to twine, weave, &c., hence 
ΠΡΌ, thread, or warp, and the deriva- 
tive in the text, 7220, weaving: so that 
the words are literally, “ the weaving 
woven over all the nations.” 

The prophecy has already, to a 
great extent, been fulfilled. The gos- 
pel, in which are unfolded the charac- 
ter of the true God, and the principles 
of his moral government, was the 
means, at an early period ofits history, 
of rescuing myriads of Jews from the 
darkness of their terrestrial notions 
respecting the Messiah and his king- 
dom, and of banishing idolatry and 
superstition from the Roman empire. 
It has, in the present day, proved 
victorious in different parts of the 
heathen world; it is in a state of 
rapid propagation ; and when this and 
other similar predictions shall have 
received their full accomplishment, 
the earth shall be full of the know- 
ledge of the Lord, as the waters cover 
the sea. 

8. A more glaring instance of 
mistaken historical interpretation is 
scarcely to be found than that given 
of the first words of this verse by 
Grotius: donee vivit Bsechias! Vitrin- 
ga, true to his principles of interpre- 
tation, explains them first of the 
times of Simon and John Hyrcanus, 
and then of certain periods of the 


CHAP. XXV.] 


ISAIAH. 


225 


And shall remove the reproach of his people from the whole 


earth: 
For Jehovah hath spoken it. 


9 And in that day it shall be said: Lo! this is our God; 
We have waited for him, and he hath saved us: 
This is Jehovah; we have waited for him; 
We will rejoice and be glad in his salvation. 
10 Assuredly the hand of Jehovah shall rest on this mountain ; 


Christian dispensation. Rosenmiiller 
and Gesenius apply them to what 
they designate the renewal of the 
golden age ; and the latter has a long 
note on the passage, in which he 
endeavours to support his view by 
referring to the Zendavesta. But all 
such exegesis fails to meet the ezi- 
gentia loci. What Isaiah predicts is not 
the partial or total cessation of war, 
extraordinary longevity, or such like, 
but the absolute abolition of death. 
In proof of this fact, the apostle 
expressly quotes it, 1 Cor. xv. 54: 
τότε γενήσεται ὁ λόγος ὁ γεγραμμένος" 
Κατεπόθη 6 θάνατος εἰς νῖκος :— 
thus concluding his celebrated argu- 
ment in defence of the doctrine of 
the resurrection. By his inspired 
authority I deem it the only wise, 
because the only safe course, in this 
and all similar cases, to abide. The 
words, as alleged by Paul, are found 
in the version of Theod., with which 
the Targ. and Syr. agree, in reading 
the verb as a passive. 533, in Piel, as 
here, commonly signifies ¢o destroy, 
destroy utterly: in Kal, the more usual 
signification is that of swallowing, 
which most of the versions have un- 
happily adopted. zx, the Greek 
translators render by ἰσχύσας, εἰς 
τέλος, εἰς νῖκος ; attaching to the term 
the idea of what is overpowering, durable, 
complete. The significations of the 
Heb. root Mz, used only in Niphal 
and Piel, are to shine, lead, lead on, be 
complete; in Chald. to surpass, excel, 
vanquish ; hence the idea of victory, 
eternity, &c., attaching to my}, and of 
completely, entirely, for ever, &c., to M22, 
mz. The words are therefore equi- 
valent to ὁ θάνατος οὐκ ἔσται ἔτι, Rev. 
xxi. 4; where there seems to be an 
evident allusion to our text; and 


where the subject is, as here, not the 
millennial state of the church, but the 
state of glory, after the resurrection 
of the body. It will be then only 
that a period shall be put to the 
reproachful persecutions of the righte- 
ous, which Isaiah likewise predicts. 
’ has here the force of: It ghall 
assuredly be, for Jehovah hath spoken 
it. 

The prophecy embraces the whole 
of the N.T. dispensation, from its 
establishment till its termination at 
the last day. 

9. A joyful acclamation of welcome 
to the Divine Redeemer, by whom the 
predicted blessings would be secured 
and bestowed. It requires no com- 
ment. ὍΝ is used impersonally : oxe 
shall say, i.e. each, and is best ren- 
dered in the plural. Thus the LXX. 
and Vulg.; but the Ger. man, and the 
French oz, according to a similar 
idiom. 

10. A new subject is here taken up, 
—the destruction of Moab. That of 
Babylon had been predicted at the 
commencement of the chapter; and 
it was requisite that the neighbouring 
enemy, from which the Jews had 
suffered so much annoyance, and 
which still evinced an indomitable 
hostility, should be exhibited in like 
circumstances of prostration. Comp. 
chapters xv. and xvi. For the use of 
3, as an absolute affirmative at the 
beginning of a prophetic announce- 
ment, see chap. xv. 1. The phrase 7 
a Tv, indicates elsewhere hostility, 
the exercise of punishment on the 
part of God; but here, in connexion 
with ™3, it is used in a good or favour- 
able sense. The Divine power should 
continue for protection in Zion. No 
codex reads 2A, shall give rest—Ynna 


220 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XXV: 


But Moab shall be trodden down in his own place, 
As straw is trodden in the water of a dunghill. 


11 


He shall even spread forth his hands in the midst of it, 


As the swimmer spreadeth forth his hands to swim ; 
And He shall bring down his pride, 
Together with the plots of his hands. 


12 
He will bring down, lay low, 


Yea, the towering fortifications of thy walls 


And level with the ground, even with the dust. 


refers to Moab and not to Jehovah, 
and means, iz his own land. Comp. 
Exod. xvi. 29; 2 Sam. vii. 10. Gese- 
nius, with many other interpreters, 
thinks Moab is here used as one of a 
class, and that the enemies of the 
Jews generally are meant; but there 
is no sufficient reason why we should 
depart from the literal meaning of the 
term. It must have given the people 
of God in Babylon great comfort to 
know, that the enemy who still resided 
in the vicinity of Judea should not be 
permitted to molest them on their 
return. For a, see chap. xxi. 10, and 
comp. 2 Kings xiii. 7. The Ὁ in 617 is 
irregularly pointed for 1; but there 
are a few instances besides of the same 
irregularity in the Niph. Infin. of 
verbs “v. The LXX., Vulg., and Syr., 
render 72279, chariots, as if they had 
found 72379 in the text; but it exists 
in no MS., and the Targ. has 7, the 
mire. Besides, 722%) is never used of 
threshing cars; 2, 722», &c. being 
employed to express such instru- 
ments: and there is a manifest paro- 
nomasia in }292 and 729792, which 
proves it to be the genuine reading. 
maT signifies duaghill. Comp. 72, 


dung, manure, and the Arab. we? 


stercoravit terram; rae Jimetum. To 
interpret the word of a town of this 
name makes no sense. According to 
the Chethib "23, we must render: “zz 
the water of the dunghill.’ The refer- 
ence is to the process taken with 
straw in the cess or pool, to reduce it 
the sooner to a state of rottenness, 
and so fit it for manure. 103, the 
Keri, though found in the text in 
upwards of thirty MSS., and confirmed 
’y the ancient versions, is, after all, 


the less probable. Symim. appears to 
have read 13, 

11. The nomin. to 2 is "δ, Moa, 
not Jehovah, as some have thought. 
The action described is that of a person 
making every effort to prevent himself 
from sinking in the water. It repre- 
sents the helpless condition of the 
Moabites under the Divine chastise- 
ments. Before 7207, subaud. Tim, 
The mention made of the pride of 
Moab is quite in keeping with the 
emphatic representation, chap. xvi. 6. 
yp mins, his crafty undertakings, from 
nx, fo weave, weave plots, lie in wait. 


Comp. the Arab. «ἡ, suscepit agen- 


dum, versatus, peritus fuit in re. ς- - Ὁ Ι; 
astutia, calliditas, ἕο. Hitzig would 
restrict the meaning to Moab’s twist- 
ing or crossing his hands, in order to 
escape being drowned; but the word 
is to be taken metaphorically, as sig- 
nifying the crafty machinations which 
he would attempt to carry into effect 
against the Jews. 

12. The prophet closes with a brief 
but pointed apostrophe, in which he 
announces to Moab the total desolation 
which should come upon that country. 
That he reverts to Babylon, as Gesen. 
supposes, cannot be admitted. It is 
doubtless to the strongly-fortified Kir- 
Moab that he refers, see chap. xv. 1, 
xvi. 7, 11. Between the readings 
yon and POV there is no difference 
as to sense: before the former, DY, the 
people, is understood ; before the latter, 
yu, the land. There is a singular 
beauty in the accuraulation of verbs 
here employed at the close of the 
verse, as well as in the addition of 
rept after JIS. 


CHAP. XXVI.] ISATAH. 227 


CHAPTER XXVI. 


Babylon having been destroyed, as predicted at the beginning of the preceding 
chapter, the captive Jews anticipate in this, their deliverance and restora- 
tion to their own land. Regarding Jerusalem as rebuilt and fortified, they 
demand admittance, and exercise a firm trust in God, that it shall take 
place, 1—4. To this they are the more excited, by reflecting on what he 
had done to the metropolis of their Babylonish enemies, 5, 6. They next 
protest their devotedness to God, 7—9 ; deplore the stubborn blindness of 
the impenitent portion of the nation, and foreshew their doom, 9—11; but 
exult in Jehovah, who had interposed on their behalf, delivering them from 
the dominion of their oppressors, 12—14; and view, by faith, the increase 
of the population, and the extension of the boundaries of the nation, 15. 
They describe the forlorn condition in which they had been during the cap- 
tivity, and the fruitlessness of all their attempts to regain their liberty, 16 
—18. Under the figure of a literal resurrection of the dead, their political 
resuscitation is then emphatically announced, 19 ; and the prophet, in con- 
clusion, calls upon them piously to await the complete infliction of the 
Divine wrath on their enemies, as it would issue in their own deliverance, 
20, 21. 


1 In that day shall this song be sung in the land of Judah: 

We have a strong city ; 

Salvation He will appoint for walls and ramparts. 

Open ye the gates, 

That the righteous nation may enter, 

[The nation] that keepeth faith. 

3 The mind that is firm, thou wilt keep in perfect peace, 
Because it trusteth in thee. 


bo 


1, sm oY describes the period of 
the return. Such of the Jews as had 
reached the land of Judea, and sur- 
veyed the strong position of Jerusa- 
lem, encourage their distant brethren 
to follow them, and assure them of 
the Divine protection. Before nv, 
subaud. 7m, which is omitted as freq. 
by a poetic elegance.—n for ὅπ LXX. 
περίτειχος, Vulg. antemurale,—the outer 
and lower fortification, divided from 
the main wall of a city by a trench. 

2. The response of the returning 
Jews, demanding admittance. In a 
national point of view, they were now 


righteous, having entirely abandoned 
idolatry, and addicted themselves to 
the worship of the true God. From 
this time, the Jews have kept them- 
selves from idols, whose service was 
the principal cause of the captivity. 
3. JD ὋΣ is very elliptical. In full, 
it would be Ὁ} Pop Hy wx Dy, The 
man whose mind is staid upon thee, &e. ; 
i.e. by implication, firm, unshaken, 
steady. Aq. πλάσμα ἐστηρίγμενον. 
Comp. Ps. exi. 8, cxii. 8. The phrase 
describes the recumbency of the 
mind upon Jehovah, from the expe- 
rience it has of his gracious support. 


ppb nz mim, “For J ehovah is 


228 


4 Trust in Jehovah for ever ; 
For truly Jehovah is J AH— 
An everlasting Rock. 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XXVI. 


5 For He hath brought down those that dwelt on high ; 
The lofty city He hath laid very low ; 
He hath laid it low, even to the ground ; 
He hath levelled it with the very dust. 


6 The foot treadeth it ; 


The feet of the afflicted, the steps of the poor. 


sz. is properly what is formed in the 
mind, but here it is used of the 
mind itself, ni ni>w, the superlative 
form : peace, pedce, i.e. the greatest, per- 
fect peace. Com. chap. vii. 19. 7953, 
though passive in form, is active in 
signification, as is the case with the 
Pah. part. of some other neuter verbs, 
as PIB, M33, &e. 

4, ma is not to be rendered, “in 
Jah,’—the 3 being the Beth essentia, 
which, according to a peculiar idiom, 
points out the reality, certainty, sub- 
stantive character or nature of the 
subject to which it is prefixed. “ Pre- 
positio 2 sepissime infert intimam ret, 
vel persone, qualitatem : sive expressum 
et eminentem characterem quo. aliquid 
insignitum est, atque distinctum.” 
Schultens in Prov. ii. 26. Ewald’s 
Gram. § 521, p. 330, Eng. Trans. 
Thus Exod. vi. 3, “I appeared unto 
Abraham, &c., "τῷ "3, wader the cha- 
racter of, evincing the properties of GoD 
Aumicuty :” xxxii. 22, “Thou know- 
est the people, 817 222 3, that they are 
radically wicked.” Prov. iii. 26, mm 
153 mm, “Jehovah shall be the sure 
object of thy confidence.” Ps. Ixvil. 4 
(Hebr. 5), 28 ™a, “His name is emphati- 
poally Jau,” ἢ. e. he is ¢ruly what it im- 
‘ports: the ErrrNAt, IMMUTABLE Gop. 
And so in the present instance : "3°? 
indeed 
what his name JaH imports; He is 
an everlasting Rock.” In each of these 
examples, I have endeavoured to ex- 
press in a paraphrase what I consider 
to be the force of the Beth. It is an 
idiomatic form, to which there is no- 
thing precisely analogous, except per- 
haps in some degree in Arab. as 


poe "Ὁ 4}, God is indeed powerful, 


—potentissimus. ἰδαφὼ aul la, God 


will prove a swift witness. Other 
examples in De Sacy’s Grammaire 
Arabe, vol. i. p. 356, in which the Ba 
is obviously mtensive—72, Rock, is 
used as a Divine name. See Deut. 
xxxii. 4, 15, 18, 30, 31; 1 Sam. 11. 2; 
Ps. xviii. 32, 47. See also on Isa. lvii. 
6. The eternity and immutable power 
of God are here alleged as a ground 
of the most unlimited confidence on 
the part of his people. 

5, 6. The prophet now applies to 
Babylon the same language which he 
had employed, chap. xxv. 12, in appli- 
cation to Kir-Moab. That the former, 
and not the latter, is here meant, 
appears from the use of D7] and ἜΣ 
following; these terms describing the 
condition to which the Jews had been 
reduced in Babylon. The punctists 
have improperly placed the Athnach 
under 72:0): it should stand under 
mrpwy,—the suffix appended to which 
shewing that the second member of 
the verse ends there, while the other 
form, 775t*, marks the commencement 
of a new member. The reader will 
notice the distinctive use of the Vuz 
Epenthetic in the former case, as in 
mys, mp2, which follow. While it 
places it in apposition with ™y, it 
places both the latter m apposition 
with myst, which, as to construction, 
occupies the same position with My. 
It also expresses the ideas with greater 
energy and intensity. The preterite 
and future tenses being combined, 
shews that the actions were continued, 
which was signally the case in regard 
to the destruction of Babylon. See 
chap. xiii. pref. 


CHAP. XXVI.| 


ISAIAH. 


7 The path of the just is perfectly straight ; 
Thou, O Righteous! makest level the way of the just. 
8 Even in the way of thy judgments, O Jehovah, have we waited 


for thee; 


To thy name, and to thy remembrance, has been the desire of 


our soul. 


9 With my soul have I desired thee in the night ; 
And with my spirit within me I have sought thee early ; 
For when thy judgments are in the earth, 
The inhabitants of the world learn righteousness. 


10 


Should mercy be shewn to the wicked, 


He will not learn righteousness ; 
In the land of rectitude he will act perversely, 
And not regard the majesty of Jehovah. 
11 O Jehovah! thy hand is lifted up, but they will not see it; 
They shall see it, and be ashamed ; 


Zeal for [thy] people, 


Yea, fire against thine enemies shall devour them. 


7. ow, straightnesses, used adjec- 
tively and intensively: very straight. 
The language is metaphorical, and ex- 
presses the provision made for the 
escape of the righteous from the try- 
ing circumstances in which they have 
been placed: and with special refer- 
ence to the Jews,—the present sub- 
ject of discourse,—the straight and 
even course prepared for them in the 
providence of God, by which to return 
to Palestine. 05, in application to a 
way, signifies to make it level or plain. 

8. While thy judgments are in a 
course of infliction on the nations, 
we expect thine interposition for our 
deliverance. There is an ellipsis of 3 
before Ms. 

9. The prophet here introduces each 
of his pious afflicted countrymen as 
individually giving vent to strong feel- 
ings of desire after the Divine favour. 
Before ‘252 and ὙΠ supply 3. The 
latter part of the verse indicates the 
effect produced on men, by the execu- 
tion of the judgments of God. Such 
is universally their tendency; and 
such, when sanctified, their result. As 
the sentiment is general, J 8 and 527 
cannot be limited to the Babylonian 


empire. That JM is not, as in the 
ancient versions, to be read in the 
third person fem. to agree with ΕΣ, 
but is merely a defective orthography 
of mx, the parallel FW clearly 
shews. The full form is found in a 
great number of MSS. and Editions. 
10, 11. Such is the perverseness of 
depraved man, that, though experi- 
encing pity from the Lord, and enjoy- 
ing the means of religious improve- 
ment, he is nevertheless blind to 
divine things, and obstinately refuses 
to avail himself of spiritual opportu- 
nities. The prophet has immediately 
in view the unbelieving portion of his 
countrymen, whom he plainly tells, 
that, though restored to their favoured 
land, they would still prove incorri- 
gible. The holy land is called i752 } x, 
terra rectitudinum, because in the 
observance of the Mosaic institutes, 
the strictest justice would abound. 
The Plur. is that of intensity. Comp. 
ver. 7. The Nun Paragogic in PY is 
corroborative: they will not αἵ all, or 
The resumption, 


FF 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XXVI. 


12 O Jehovah! thou hast ordained peace for us ; 
Yea, all our works also thou hast performed for us. 


13 
over us; 


O Jehovah our God! other lords besides thee have had dominion 


But thee,—thy name alone will we celebrate. 


14 


They are dead, they shall not live ; 


They are deceased, they shall not rise: 
Because thou hast visited and destroyed them, 
And made all remembrance of them to perish. 


15 


Thou hast increased the nation, O Jehovah! 


Thou hast increased the nation; thou art glorified ; 
Thou hast widely extended all the boundaries of the land. 


16 


O Jehovah! in affliction they sought thee ; 


They poured out a whisper, when under thy chastisement. 


zeal of God in behalf of his people ; 
by the latter, his wrath effecting the 
destruction of his enemies. Comp. 
for the construction, Ps. lxix. 9 (Hebr. 
10) ; Obad. 10. 

12. nod, like oni, md, 12, signifies, 
in such connexion, fo procure, grant, 
effect, or such like. From the expe- 
rience which the church had had of 
the Divine operations in her behalf, 
on every former occasion of deliver- 
ance, she confidently expects the res- 
toration of her prosperity, as the 
result of the same gracious agency. 
D3 is here intensive. 

13, 14. Jehovah was the only legiti- 
mate sovereign of the Hebrew nation. 
The Assyrians, Babylonians, &c., had 
exercised an usurped dominion over 
them; but they confidently anticipate 
emancipation from captivity, and their 
grateful celebration of the praise of 
God in their own land. The 3 in 43 
is the Beth of Instrument. The 14th 
verse fully sets forth the result of the 
Divine interposition in their favour : 
—the complete destruction of their 
enemies. 0° and Ow), though verbal 
nouns, are used instead of verbs ; or 
the pronoun 7277 may be supplied, as 
in most versions. To view them as 
nominatives absolute, and apply them 
to the deceased Israelites, as Hitzig 
does, the connexion forbids. The 
LXX. render the latter word by 
ἰατροὶ, physicians, having read DX5) 


instead of OND). As the dead are de- 
prived of all the power over the living, 
which they might have possessed, and 
can never resume it, so it was with 
the Babylonians. This the Jews ex- 
pected, and their expectations were 
not frustrated. The Chaldean empire 
was entirely destroyed. 22 has here 
the force of a conjunction. The use 
of ἸῺ after 723, instead of 073, is 
poetic and intensive. 

15. This verse describes the in- 
crease of the population, and the 
extension of the boundaries of the 
land, in order that it might contain 
them. The verbs are in the preterite, 
to express the certainty of the event. 

16. During the exile, the Jews re- 
turned to the true service of God, and 
earnestly supplicated deliverance from 
the affliction by which they were op- 
pressed. 72 is used in the unusual 


sense of seeking after what has been 


lost. Arab. X88, gucsivit rem perditam ; 


desideravit, inquisivit. They had lost 
the favour of God, which they were 
now anxious to recover. PY is no- 
where else employed metaphorically 
to express giving utterance in prayer ; 
but "seems purposely selected to ex- 
press the intensity of the action. 
This intensity is further indicated by 
the addition of the Nun Paragogic, 
which is of extremely rare occurrence 
in the pretez'te. Comp. 1 Sam. i, 15 ; 


CHAP. XXVI.] 


ISAIAH. 


231 


17 As a pregnant woman, about to bear, 
Is in pain, and crieth aloud in her pangs, 
So have we been, away from thy presence, O Jehovah ! 


18 


We have been pregnant ; we have been in pain ; 


When we brought forth—it was wind: 
We effected no deliverance for the land ; 
Neither were the inhabitants of the world brought forth. 


19 
Their dead bodies shall rise : 


Thy dead men shall live again ; 


Awake and sing, ye that dwell in the dust ! 


Ps. cii. 1; the Aneid, vi. 55, fuditque 
preces rex pectore abimo. “03, prayer ; 
from 8m}, to whisper, speak with a soft 
or dow voice; but here without any 
regard to such strict etymological sig- 
nification, except in so far perhaps as 


it respects the exhaustion, produced. 


by long-continued devotional exer- 
cises. 

17, 18. 7222, from thy presence, 1. e. 
at a distance from Jerusalem, where, 
in the temple, the Divine presence 
was vouchsafed. As protection and 
aid were connected with the presence 
of Jehovah, so exclusion from it im- 
plied exposure and helplessness. In 
the beginning of ver. 18, Michaelis 
imagined he discovered an allusion to 
what physicians call an empueumatosis, 
or physometra—tfalse symptoms of preg- 
nancy, arising from an accumulation 
of wind in the uterus, which termi- 
nate in its emission. It is more pro- 
bable, however, that the prophet had 
in view the false pains which fre- 
quently precede actual labour, and 
disappoint the expectations which 
they had excited. In this case ™ is 
not to be taken literally, but meta- 
phorically, as denoting vanity, nothing. 
Thus Cicolampadius: /frwstra tulimus 
dolores. The reference is to the futi- 
lity of all the self-originating schemes 
and hopes of the Jews in Babylon, 
which had for their object their poli- 
tical regeneration. τῶν), Cicolampa- 
dius, Leo Juda, Cube, Gesenius, Rosen- 
miller, and Maurer, take to be the 
Niphal participle; but as this form 
of the verb does not occur elsewhere, 
it seems preferable, with Hitzig and 
Scholz, to abide by the common con- 


struction, according to which it is the 
first person plural of Kal. This the 
context also corroborates, and it is 
the rendering of the LXX., Vulg.,, 
Syr., and Arab. Cocceius, Déderlein, 
Dathe, Gesenius, Hitzig, Maurer, and 
Scholz, interpret 929 Δ᾽ Y= 53, the in- 
habitants of the (Jewish) world are not 
born. This construction best suits the 
connexion, and is confirmed by a simi- 
lar use of 53, ver. 19. It is true the 
verb is not otherwise thus employed ; 
and 23 is only used of abortions ; but 


the use of the Arab. haw, fo full, for 


to be born, together with that of the 
Greek πίπτειν, the Latin cado, ἧτο. in 
the same acceptation, are in favour of 
this interpretation. See the literature 
in Gesenius. In our own language fo 
Jali is used with respect to the irra- 
tional animals, in the sense of bearing 
and being born. That °2n may signify 
the Jewish world, see chap. xxiv. 4, 
where, as in the present instance, it 
is synonymous with JX, in the sense 
of the land of Judea. 'TYhe meaning is, 
the country is not yet inhabited ; 
those who should possess it are as if 
they were still unborn. 

19. From the images employed by 
the prophet, it is evident that the 
doctrine of the resurrection of the 
dead obtained among the Jews of his 
time. He assumes the fact, and bor- 
rows from it language admirably adap- 
ted to express, in a strong and forcible 
manner, what he had to teach relative 
to the restoration of the Jews from 
Babylon. Comp. Ezek. xxxviil. 1—14, 
where, in like manner, the political 
regeneration of the same people is 


292 


ISATAH. 


(CHAP. XXVI. 


For as the dew of herbs is thy dew, 
And the earth shall bring forth the deceased. 


predicted in figurative language taken 
from that event. Treating of these 
passages in Isaiah and Ezekiel, Pareau 
adds, “Observandum est insuper, 
eorum sermones ad usus publicos 
fuisse destinatos ; ex quo consequitur 
hance resurrectionis doctrinam ea etate 
vulgo ita notum fuisse, ut facile per- 
spicua et quodammodo popularis 
imago inde possit desumi.” Comm. 
de Immortal. p. 109. That the doc- 
trine of the resurrection is really im- 
plied in the passage, Gesenius declares 
to be beyond doubt (unzweifelhaft) ; 
but there is no foundation for his 
position, that it was not known to 
the Jews previous to the captivity ; 
that they borrowed it, and many other 
ideas, from the Zoroastrian theology ; 
and consequently, that this portion of 
the book could not have been written 
at so early a period as the days of 
Isaiah. It must be maintained, on 
the evidence of such texts as Job xiv. 
14,15; Ps. xvii. 15, xlix. 15, that the 
Hebrews did anciently expect a resur- 
rection ; and though the light which 
they possessed on the subject was not 
so clear as that which the nation 
afterwards acquired, it was neverthe- 
less sufficient to sustain the hopes of 
the righteous, and excite in their 
bosom an ardent longing after an 
event of such thrilling interest. The 
object of the pronominal suffix in 
72, is not the prophet, as some sup- 
pose, but Jehovah, who is repeatedly 
addressed in the preceding part of the 
chapter. The Jews were still his, 
though it might be concluded from 
the condition to which they were re- 
duced, that all connexion between 
him and them had ceased. The ? in 
53) has greatly perplexed expositors. 
A change of person is not unusual 
in the prophets; but one so harsh 
and appareitly inappropriate is unex- 
ampled. For the prophet to introduce 
himself, or the Messiah, as employing 
the language, “ .Wy dead body,’’ seems 
totally irrelevant to the subject. Nor 
would the construction as to sense be 
improved, if, with Kimchi, our Com- 
mon Version, &e we were to supply 


an ellipsis of Ὃν, with, together with. 1 
therefore take the ?, not to be in this 
case the pronominal suffix, but a poetic 
augment absolute. This augment oc- 
curs frequently in the status construc- 
tus, as 107, Ps, ὍΣ. Δ: ΝΟΣ, Isa. 21 5 
but there is an evident transition to- 
wards the absolute state in those in- 
stances in which the preposition 3 is 
prefixed to the second noun, as ‘2% 
mows, Ps. cxxili. 1 ; 753 ΤΩΣ, Exod. xv. 
6; oan, Lam. i. 1. Comp. the 
adverbs °n73, ‘Ny. None of the ancient 
versions, except the Vulg., exhibits 
any thing corresponding to the letter 
as standing for the suffix of the first 
person. On the contrary, the Chald. 


» v Ψ 
pA, and the Syr. (OTLap DSC Sup- 


ply that of the third person, which I 
cannot but think is the meaning, and 
have rendered accordingly. The Ma- 
soretes appear to have taken the same 
view of the matter; for they have 
pointed the word ‘222, and not °n)2:, 
after the analogy of 1223, and Onn, 
which we should have expected. The 
same may be said of the LXX., though 
they render freely, οἱ ἐν τοῖς μνημείοις. 
That 752) is used here as a collective, 
po, the plural of the following verb, 
sufficiently shews. It is thus used 
Ley. xi. 11, where our translators have 
properly rendered it carcases, in the 
plural—The suffix in 4328 either 
refers to OY understood, or to each of 
the bY 9228, taken distributively. Ge- 
senius and others refer it to Jehovah, 
but less properly. mis 52, ¢he dew of 
plants. The Targ., Syr, Vulg., and 
several of the moderns, render, “the 
dew of light,” or “lights,” —understand- 
ing thereby the morning dew, or the 
brightness with which it glistens on the 
face of the ground; but the rendering 
I have adopted is that given by Kim- 
chi, and approved by Rosenmiiller, 
Winer, Hitzig, and Maurer. This sig- 
nification of nix may justly be re- 
garded as decided by an appeal to 2 
Kings iv. 39—the only other instance 
in which it is used in the feminine 
plural. In the latter passage the 
LXX. retain the word dpio8 ; but the 


CHAP. XXVII.| 


ISAIAH. 


233 


20 Come, my people! enter into thy chambers, 
And shut thy doors behind thee ; 
Hide thee, as it were for a little moment, 
Till the indignation have passed over. 


21 


For behold! Jehovah cometh forth from his place, 


To punish the iniquity of the inhabitants of the earth; 
And the earth shall disclose her blood, 


And no longer cover her slain. 


other Greek versions have ἀγριολάχανα; 
the Targ. 722, olera; Vulg. herbas 


agrestes ; the Syr. and Arab. laso3 ἢ 
' Vase malva. The prophet’s meaning 


τ That as the dew, which in the 
East falls very copiously on the herbs 
of the field, and imparts to them fresh 
life and vigour, so the Divine influence 
or power should be exerted on the 
Jews of the captivity, in consequence 
of which they should come forth fresh 
and vigorous, to serve Jehovah in 
their own land. Comp. Ps. Ixxii. 6 ; 
Hos. xiv. 5,6. Headds, ἘΠ O'SD) FINI, 
and the earth shall bring forth ‘the de- 
ceased; 1. 6. the inhabitants who had 
disappeared, and were accounted as 
dead, should again come into a state 
of visible and active existence. It is 
obvious from Job i. 21,and Ps. cxxxix. 
15, that the ancient believers regarded 
the earth as our common mother ; so 
that the figurative language here em- 
ployed by Isaiah must have been 
easily understood. For the meaning 
of 7517, see on the preceding verse. 
20. Instead of NV, fen of Kenni- 


cott’s and thirteen of De Rossi’s MSS.,. 
three printed editions, read 72, as in 
the Keri; but, independently of the 
form, the noun has here a plural sig- 
nification. This and the following 
verse form an epilogue, in which the 
Jews in Babylon are exhorted to wait 
in silent retirement for the termina- 
tion of the judgments which God was 
about to bring upon that empire by 
the army of Cyrus. With the close 
of these judgments was immediately 
connected the deliverance of the Jews 
To express the magnitude and cer- 
tainty of the catastrophe, Jehovah is 
represented as coming forth from 
heaven, when the blood and dead 
bodies of the slain which had long 
remained unavenged, and had been 
hid from human view, are exhibited 
in evidence of the cruelties that had 
been committed, especially such as 
had been wantonly exercised on the 
people of God, in order that vengeance 
might be taken on those who had per- 
petrated them. In illustration of th - 
two concluding lines, see Gen. iv. 10 
11; Job xvi. 18. 


CHAPTER XXVIL. 


The connexion between this and the preceding chapter is obvious. 


The 


prophet, having announced the appearance of Jehovah to avenge his people, 
now proceeds further to predict the complete destruction of the Babylo- 


nians, | ; 


he assures them of the Divine care and protection, 2—6; shews 


234 


the lenity with which they had been 


ISATAH. 


(CHAP. XXVII. 


punished, and the design and result of 


their punishment, 7—9; describes the desolate condition of Babylon, 10, 
11; and announces the great ingathering of the Jews which should follow 
the destruction of the Babylonian empire; and their engaging anew in the 


worship of God at Jerusalem, 12, 13. 


1 In that day shall Jehovah punish with his sword, 
The hard, the great, and the powerful sword, 


Leviathan, the fleet serpent, 


1. sm oa, αὐ that time, i.e. at the 
period of the Medo-Persian invasion. 
The ascription of a sword to Jehovah 
is not unusual; see Deut. xxxii. 41, 
42; Isa. xxxiv. 5; Ezek. xxi. ὦ, 4, 5. 
It denotes the instrument which he 
employs in executing his judgments. 
The three epithets by which it is 
described correspond to the three 
monsters, or the triple character of 
the power on which it was to inflict 
the judgments. ὉΠ, Gesenius takes 
to be a noun with the termination ἢ, 
and instances jpv72 as analogously 
formed; but it seems preferable to 
regard both as compounds : jf signify- 
ing a serpent, monster, or such like. 
my) is a wreath, that which is convolved 
or twisted; from ™, to join, wreathe, 


9 
&.; ‘Syr. JaXS eka see conjunatt ; 
Arab. usr torsit se et vertit funem; 


III. “lJ, inflexit se et spiras fecit serpens ; 
kis] I, serpens flecus. From a com- 


parison of the several passages in 
which the word occurs, it clearly 
appears to be synonymous with p27, a 
great fish, sea-monster, serpent, and ὉΠ), 
which, in its general acceptation, sig- 
nifies all kinds of larger animals that 
move witha wriggling motion, whether 
on the land or in the water. That it 
more specifically denotes the crocodile, 
Job iii. 8, xl. 25, has been regarded as 
almost a settled point since this inter- 
pretation, first given by Beza and 
Diodati, was learnedly supported by 
Bochart, Hieroz. P. IIL. lib. v. cap. 16 
—18. To express more forcibly the 


qualities of the monster here referre:} 
to, he is described first as 172 373, and 
then as ΠΡ wm, As ™3 signifies to 
reach across, a8 a bar, Aq., Symm., and 
the Vulg., render it accordingly; but 
ὄφιν φεύγοντα, given by the LXX., is 
more agreeable to the usual acceptation 
of the verb fo flee, be fleet : serpens fugax. 


Comp. the Arab. Sy) oh the son of 


fleetness, i.e. the gazelle. It is used in 
connexion with ὉΠ only in one other 
passage, Job xxvi. 13, where, however, 
the reference evidently is to the celes- 
tial hemisphere. iniY, tortuous, from 
"2, to twist, wind, coil, describes the 
sinuosities, or coils, which serpents 
form with their bodies, by the sudden 
unfolding of which they are enabled 
to spring forward, and thereby effect 
a very rapid motion. 


“Saucius at serpens sinuosa volumina 
versat, 

Arrectisque horret. squamis et sibilat 
ore, 

Arduus insurgens.”— Zeid. lib. xi. 
753. 

yin, Arab. 


Ad, serpens inyens, draco, 


ῳ 
a kind of large serpent; also a large 
aquatic animal. 


Comp. Fe) » thunnus 


piscis, the tunny, which is the largest 
fish of the whale species found in the 
Mediterranean. Ininterpreting this 
passage, the chief difficulty lies in 
determining whether one gigantic 
monster is intended, of which the 
several epithets employed describe the 
character; or whether more than one, 


CHAP. XXVII.]| 


ISAIAH. 


235 


Even Leviathan, the coiling serpent :— 
Yea, he will kill the monster that is in the sea. 
2 In that day, sing ye concerning the vineyard: 


say two or three, are meant. Kimchi, 
Abenezra, Jarchi, Vitringa, Lowth, 
Jenour, Hitzig, Scholz, and others, 
consider three distinct animals to have 
been chosen as the symbolical repre- 
sentatives of as many hostile powers ; 
but which these are they are not 
agreed: some supposing them to be 
Assyria, Babylon, and Egypt; others, 
Egypt, Assyria, and Tyre; others 
differently. If Leviathan, occurring 
the second time, be merely a repetition 
of the former name, for the purpose 
of introducing an additional epithet, 
then enly two monsters are exhibited, 
which may be viewed as representing 
Babylon and Egypt. In this case the 
second Vaz must, as freq., be rendered 
even. Schnurrer, Eichhorn, and Gese- 
nius, are of opinion that the various 
epithets describe only one animal, and 
that, how incongruous soever it would 
be to represent such an animal as 
actually existing in nature, it is in no 
degree abhorrent from the symbolical 
language of prophecy—the end of 
which is, in such case, to magnify the 
terrific character of the empire for 
which it stands. The different epi- 
thetsaremerely thesymbolical drapery, 
shewing the image to advantage. Thus 
Dan. vii. 7, 8; Rev. xiii. 1—10; non- 
descripts, somewhat similar, are intro- 
duced. On this principle, fully to set 
forth the formidable, cruel, and de- 
structive nature of the Babylonian 
power, a combination of the hugest,and 
most horrid monsters was required; 
and certainly none could have been 
more appropriately selected than those 
here specified. Luzzato agrees with 
Gesenius in supposing that the Baby- 
lonian empire is meant; but he de- 
cidedly thinks that three distinct sub- 
jects are specified as itsemblem. Both 
TY, and oy, are applied to Hyypt, 
Ps. xxiv. 13, 14, and 2, or pin, Ezek. 
XXxix. 3, xxxll.2; but this is no reason 
why Isaiah should not have used the 
same well-known symbolical terms in 
application to Babylon, the subject of 
which he had just been treating. 


This interpretation appears, on the 
whole, best supported. For the use 
of 0, the sea, in reference to Babylon, 
see chap. xxi. 1. 

2. From this verse to the fifth 
inclusive we have a song of encourage- 
ment, in which Jehovah, under the 
symbol of the keeper of a vineyard, 
is represented as the protector and 
nourisher of the Jewish church. 
Houbigant, Lowth, Dathe, Schnurrer, 
and Boothroyd, consider this song as 
responsive :—Jehovah speaking, ver. 
3; the vineyard responding, ver. 4; 
Jehovah again in the second distich of 
the same verse, and part of the 5th ; 
then the vineyard, &. See Lowth’s 
translation. This fanciful, and in 
some parts very forced construction, 
appears to have originated in an 
undue pressing of what Gesenius 
takes to be the primary idea conveyed 
by 722, to sing in responses. The verb, 
however, is never thus used; all the 
passages in which it occurs simply 
convey the notion of singing, or the 
repetition of the same words; but 
not of dialogistic response.—N77 OY2 
is parallel in point of time with the 
same phrase, ver. 1, and shews that 
when the Divine judgments were in 
execution upon the Babylonians, the 
Jews should be safe. On the com- 
parison of the Jewish church to a 
vineyard, see chap. v. 1—7. Instead 
of V2 0, a vineyard of wine, or red 
wine, V2 O12, a vineyard of delight, is 
found in thirty-nine MSS., the Soncin. 
Edit., and that of Van der Hooght ; 
and is countenanced by the LXX., 
and apparently by the Targum; but 
the former is exhibited in about seventy 
MSS., in sixty-eight printed editions, 
and has the support of the Syr. and 
Vulg. Being the more difficult, it is 
in all probability the genuine reading. 
Since 07 does not necessarily express 
the idea of rineyard, but simply that 
of field or garden ina state of culti- 
vation, there is no tautology in adding 
wo to it. Comp. mo, olive yard, 
Judg. xv.5. The combination 127 Ὁ, 


236 


3 I Jehovah do keep it— 
Every moment I water it— 
Lest any should injure it, 

I keep it night and day. 

4 There is no fury in me: 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XXVII. 


Yet, would that I had the briers and thorns in battle! 


I would advance against them ; 
I would burn them up at once. 


5 But if any will cling to my protection, 


He shall make peace with me ; 


Peace with me he shall make. 


however, occurs Amos v. ll. The 
words form a nomin. absolute: As it 
regards the vineyard, sing ye, &c. 073 1s 
an epicenic noun, and therefore takes 
m after it. 

3. Nearly thirty MSS., jive editions, 
and the Syr., read 7px, instead of 172, 
but obviously from an original mis- 
take. 772 is here used in the sense of 
hostilely invading, so as to injure, de- 
stroy, &c. Gwinglius renders, xe quis 
eam invadat. OY) has DY ΤῸ corres- 
ponding to it, just as in Job vii. 18, it 
has 0>2.. Both plurals express con- 
tinual repetition. 

4. The language of Jehovah at the 
beginning of this verse is evidently to 
be restricted to the vineyard, or people 
of the Jews. As it respected them 
there was no fury in him; but it was 
reserved for his and their enemies. 
See chap. xxxiv. 2, lxiii. 3, 5, 6; Nah. 
1.2. The LXX. and Syr. read 73h, ὦ 
wall, instead of M27. 227 stands for 
) JE. Ὁ, as ἜΣ for 7? Ἤν», Neh. ix. 28, 
and is to be taken in the usual idio- 
matic sense of wishing. It is here 
equivalent to a strong adversative 
mode of construction, as, But if any 
oppose me, ζο. Mo WY, an asyndeton 
for m4) Wav, which is found ina few 
MSS., and is expressed in the LXX., 
Aq., Symm., Targ., Vulg. We have 
other instances in ΠΝ Np, chap. xxviii. 
8; Yow pip, xxxii. 13; Ty wow, Hab. 
iii. 11. The 7 in 73, and the 7} in 
Try, are the femin. suffixes used dis- 
tributively as neuters in reference to 
moyav. By the briers and thorns are 
meant hostile powers, those who op- 


pose themselves to God and _ his 
people ; wicked and ungodly men. 
Comp. chap. x. 17. In the Arabic 
poem of Amru the same figurative 
use of one of the terms occurs: “ We 
stripped the branches of every thorn 
that opposed us.” Ὁ, to advance 


upon, attack successfully ; Arab. ee, 


desuper percussit ; V. oppressit, vicit ali- 
quem; Vulg. gradiar super eam; Schmid. 
cnvadam ea. 


5. ix, Arab. a), aut, non, nisi, &C. or; 


used here as a conditional particle, du¢ 
if; ἐὰν δὲ, as the LXX. properly give 
it, Exod. xxi. 36. This verse exhibits 
in the strongest light the benignity of 
the Divine character. His enemies 
must be punished; but if any of them 
repent and sue for peace, it will as- 
suredly be granted. ἩΡῸΞ PIT is a 
mode of expression borrowed from 
the practice of fleeing to, and laying 
fast hold of altars, &c. as asylums or 
places of refuge. 1 Kings i. 50. Comp. 
for td, Ps. xxxvii. 39, xlii. 2; Isa. 
xxv. 4. ‘If any one would avail him- 
self of my protection, make me his 
refuge, test that security which alone 
is to be found in me, let him,” &c. 
ὁ DW Tiny’, according to Josh. ix. 15, 
would be. he shall grant me peace; but ? 
is frequently used in the sense of, iz 
respect to, as it regards, &c. and is here 
equivalent to DY, with; ἃ superior 
being referred to. The ancient ver- 
sions have read 1, and the Syr. has 
the verb in the first person. The re- 
petition of the words expresses cer- 


CHAP. XXVII.| 


ISATAH. 


237 


6 In coming days Jacob shall take root, 
Tsrael shall flower and blossom, 
And fill the face of the world with fruit. 
7 Hath He smitten him as He smote him who smote him ? 
Is he slain like the slaying of his slain? 
8 Very moderately when she was put away didst thou contend 


with her: 


He took her away with his rough blast in the day of the east 


wind ; 


tainty ; and the inversion, by which 
DIB, peace, is placed first, has the feli- 
citous effect of giving prominence to 
what is supposed most powerfully to 
interest the mind of one who seeks 
reconciliation. Comp. Hos. viii. 11. 

6. The song being ended, the pro- 
phet proceeds to assure the captive 
Jews of the future prosperity of the 
nation, when restored to their own 
land. The metaphor is borrowed from 
the practice of horticulture, and was 
naturally suggested by the subject of 
_ the preceding verses. O37 is ellip- 
| tical for Dxat DvD, iz the days which 
| are coming ; and is not to be rendered 
. as if in construction with 37%, which 
our translators have done. For ὑπ, 
see Ps. lxxx. 10. 3m is here, as chap. 
xxiv. 4; xxvi. 18, the Jewish world. 

7. In such appeals, the interroga- 
tive 7, and the corresponding particle 
ox, have the force of a strong nega- 
tive. Directly the reverse of what is 
expressed is required in the answer 
implied. The suffix in Ym is to be 
referred to the enemy of Israel, not 
to Israel himself—732 being the paral- 
lel term with which it corresponds. 
The punishment of the Jews was not 
to be compared, in point of severity, 
with that of those who were the 
instruments of inflicting it: the num- 
ber of the Assyrians and Babylonians 
killed by their conquerors far exceeded 
that of the Hebrews slain by these 
enemies in their incursions into the 
kingdoms of Israel and Judah. For 
the paronomasia, see chap. xxii. 17, 
18. 
8. To fill up the ellipsis, subaud. 


bax, Arab. Ql, which corrects or 
denies what has just been expressed, 


and introduces an affirmative propo- 
sition expressing the opposite, xo, on 
the contrary. Instead of having treated 
his people as he had treated their 
enemies, Jehovah had exercised great 
lenity towards them. Assyria and Ba- 
bylon were utterly destroyed ; whereas 
the Jews, though chastised, were pre- 
served and restored to circumstances 
of great prosperity in their native 
country. Of yexo3, Michaelis ob- 
serves, “a strange word, of which I 
can give no satisfactory explanation.” 
It has been a stumbling-block to 
many other interpreters; some of 
whom have had recourse to violent 
means in order to relieve the diffi- 
culty. The radical idea seems to be 
expressed in Aq., Symm., Theod., 
Targ., Syr.—the authors of these ver- 


.Sions having derived the word from 


md, a measure. As to form, if it is 
not to be taken for a reduplicate 
verb, changing the punctuation into 
ΝΌΜΟΣ, and thus exhibiting a deno- 
minative from the above noun, it may 
be regarded as a repetition of it in 
the form of a compound ; the 7 being 
dropped, and the Dagesh compen- 
sative and conjunctive being inserted 
in the Ὁ. Its resolution, therefore, 
will be TND ANDI, by measure, measure, 
1. 6. very measuredly, moderately ; as 
pray prov, deep, deep, very deep. Comp. 


the Arab. lly, intendit rem; ω»», 


dousldos revit pro arbitrio, &e. ; rte, 
rector, administrator, one who eatends, 
or measures out what is due to those 
over whom he is placed. Thus ΒΕ, 
wen, and especially the latter word, 
as parallel in its application with that 
in question, Jer. x. 24, xxx. 11, xlvi. 


GG 


238 


ISAIAH. 


(CHAP. XXVII. 


9 Nevertheless by this is the iniquity of Jacob expiated ; 
And this is all the fruit—the removal of his sin: 
When he maketh all the stones of the altar 
Like lime-stones broken in pieces ; 
The images of Astarte and the pillars of the sun shall rise no 


more. 


10 For the fortified city is in a state of desolation, 
A dwelling emptied and deserted like the wilderness ; 


28. The fem. suffixes in T2277 ΠΡῸΣ, 
refer to the Jewish state or church, 
viewed as espoused to Jehovah ; and 
the former verb, while it appropriately 
expresses the expulsion of the Jews 
from their own land, is the very term 
employed chap. 1. 1, for divorcing a 
wife. In the latter there is a sudden 
change of the person from the third 
to the second, or the direct form of 
address, which, as I have already had 
occasion to notice, is very common in 
Hebrew, especially in poetry. 1324, 
Kimchi 07, fo remove, see 2 Sam. xx. 
13 ; Prov. xxv. 4,5. By “the day of 
the east wind” is meant the judgment 
inflicted by the Babylonians : DY being 
put for day of calamity, judgment, 
&c, See chap. ii. 12. The ΟῚ», Theod. 
καύσων, is the hot wind, called by the 


Arabs eres Samoom, (Arab. Ver. Jer. 
XVili. 17, ee ra aE the Simoom wind,) 


which blows from the south-east, 
across the arid wastes to the east of 
Palestine, during the hot months of 
summer. It resembles the steam 
from the mouth of an oven, scorches 
the grass, and fills up the wells with 
sand, and, when more than ordinarily 
violent, is most destructive in its 
effects. It seldom lasts longer than 
thirty-six or forty hours. See Robin- 
son’s Calmet, art. Winds. To this the 
Babylonish invasion is aptly compared. 


9. 323, like the Arab. ωϑ , has here 


an adversative force, and marks a 
transition from the description of the 
calamity to that of its happy results. 
752, in the expiatory sense, implies 
suffering with a view to the removal 
of guilt, whether such suffering be 
that of the offender, or of another in 


his stead. The word is frequently 
used of civil as well as of religious 
expiations, The meaning here is, the 
punishment threatened against the 
idolatry, and other sins of the Jews, 
had been endured in Babylon ; and 
the evils having been removed, they 
were to be pardoned and delivered. 
The fruit or consequence of the Divine 
judgment upon them was the aban- 
donment of idolatry. This is ex- 
pressly stated in the latter half of the 
verse. 72 ΠῚ is equivalent to all this. 
Gesenius preposterously interprets 
mara of the Divine altar at Jerusalem, 
and considers Jehovah to be the 
agent spoken of, whereas it is evi- 
dently the idolatrous altar, or altars, 
the prophet has in view; the entire 
destruction of which he ascribes to 
the repentant Jews. 3 occurs only 
in this place. Comp. Arab. > cala 
viva, unslaked lime. For os and 
D227, see chap. xvii. 8. 

10, 11. Schnurrer, Gesenius, Maurer, 
and others, take the ruined city here 
described to be Jerusalem ; but such 
construction ill suits the connexion. 
It is more consistent with the entire 
context to apply the description to 
Babylon—the destruction of which 
proved the death-blow of idolatry, so 
far as the Jews were concerned ; and 
was, in a great measure, the occasion 
of its fall in that part of the East. 
11a is properly solitariness, separation ; 
but here it means the condition of 
one who is abandoned and left to 
himself; desolation. ΤΠ, which is 
otherwise used of a house, or dwelling 
in general, is here, and Zeph. ii. 6, 
employed to denote the habitations 
of shepherds. 5»D, her branches, i.e. 
the branches of the trees and bushes 


CHAP. XXVII.| 


ISAIAH. 


239 


There the calf shall feed, and there shall it lie down, 
And entirely consume her branches. 

11 When her boughs wither, they shall be broken off; 
Women shall come and make fires with them. 
For it was a people of no understanding ; ° 
Therefore he that made it had no mercy upon it, 
And he that formed it shewed it no favour. 


But it shall be im that day, 


That Jehovah shall have an olive-harvest, 
From the branch of the river to the torrent of Egypt, 
And ye shall be gleaned one by one, O ye sons of Israel. 


13 And it shall be in that day, 


left in her deserted gardens and 
parks ; or which had grown up among 
her ruins. The gathering of fuel in 
the East belonged to females, on 
whom devolved the baking and other 
culinary occupations. Besides dung, 
which was most generally in use, 
thorns, vine-twigs, ὅσο. were collected 
for this purpose. To express the 
diminutive character of the trees 
referred to, Y37, which is otherwise 
masculine, is conceived of as feminine, 
and made the nominative to the femi- 
nine verb 7728n, the plural form of 
which is accounted for by the noun 
being a collective. The suffix in 77x 
further shews that Y¥7? is an ideal, 
though not a grammatical feminine. 
See Ewald. καὶ 363, 364, 366 ; Lee, art. 
215. 5. The concluding words de- 
scribe the awfully brutish condition 
of the idolaters of Babylon, and their 
entire abandonment by Jehovah to 
merited destruction. The epenthetic 
Nuns are emphatic. 

12,13. A lucid prediction of the 
recovery of the Jews after the de- 
struction of Babylon by Cyrus. 27, 


Arab. las, vehementer percussit, Srondes 


ex arbore decussit ; to strike or beat off 
olives from the trees—the mode in 
which they are reaped, Deut. xxiv. 
20. See on chap. xvu.6. The image 
is employed to set forth the collection 
of Jews from the places in Palestine 
in which they had lived during the 
general dispersion. The individual 
gathering intimates that none of them 
should be neglected. ‘The boundaries 


here specified are those which sepa- , 
rated Palestine, in its widest extent, 
from Babylonia and Egypt ; and com- 
prehend the regions occupied by such 
of the Jews as had not been carried 
away into captivity ; but who, never- 
theless, lived in a disunited state, 
having no civil or religious polity. 
TET naw, the stream of the river, i.e. 
collectively, the streams or canals of 
the Euphrates. Zwinglius translates, 
ἃ rapido flumine Euphrate. The term 
n2a8 was in all probability suggested 
by the reference to the olive-harvest 
—n)av signifying the branch of a tree, 
between which and that of a river 
there is a strong analogy. The radical 
signification of 52% is to flow. That 
by the oso ‘m2 is meant ls 


wz, the torrent Harish, on the 


confines of Palestine and Egypt, is 
now universally admitted ; LXX. Ῥινο- 
kopodpa; Symm. and of dour. render, 
ἕως τοῦ χειμάῤῥου Αἰγύπτου, to the 
winter-brook of Egypt, which cannot 
possibly be applied to the Nile. See 
Numb. xxxiv. 5; Josh. xv. 4, 47; 
1 Kings viii. 65; 2 Kings xxiv. 7, in 
which last passage we have the same 
frontiers as in the present verse. 
Tox) is not in construct. with 7x, as 
the points would seem to intimate. 
See Zech. xi. 7. 

Having predicted the restoration 
of those Jews who should be found 
within the boundaries of the Holy 
Land, Isaiah next foreshews that 
such as had been removed beyond 


240 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XXVIII. 


That a great trumpet shall be sounded, 
And those shall come who were perishing in the land of 


Assyria, 


And the outeasts in the land of Egypt, 
And shall worship Jehovah in the holy mount of Jerusalem. 


these limits, and were in circum- 
stances of lamentable religious desti- 
tution, should also return and enjoy 
their ancient privileges in Jerusalem. 
By the trumpet we are doubtless to 
understand proclamations of liberty 
to those who had been subject to the 
sway of the Babylonian and Egyptian 


made by Cyrus, Canibyses, Darius, 
&e. That Assyria, and not Babylon, 
is mentioned, may be owing to the 
greater proportion of the Hebrews 
having been transported during the 
Assyrian monarchy ; and also to the 
circumstance, that the country con- 
tinued, in a great measure, the same. 


kings. These proclamations were 


CHAPTER XXVIII. 


This chapter commences with a denunciation against the kingdom of the ten 
tribes, 1—4; and, after touching on the prosperous state of things in 
Judah under the reign of Hezekiah, 5, 6, the prophet abruptly proceeds to 
describe the deterioration which should speedily take place among that 
favoured division of the Hebrew nation—the profligacy of their teachers, 
7,8; their mockery of Divine things, 9, 10; and its condign punishment, 
11—15. He then announces the Messiah, and the security of all who 
should avail themselves of his salvation, 16; points out the vanity of all 
other refuges, 17; and predicts the awful judgments which should be 
brought upon the unbelievers, 18S—22. The conclusion, 23—29, consists 
of an appeal to the skill of the husbandman, in justification of the 
various methods of the Divine procedure in conducting the processes 
of moral cultivation. 


1 Wo to the proud crown of the drunkards of Ephraim, 
And the fading flower of their glorious beauty ; 


1. This and the three following 
chapters appropriately begin with ‘7, 
on account of the pointed denun- 
ciations contained in them, though 
with these denunciations are com- 
bined promises of mercy. Samaria, 
the capital of the ten tribes, was 


built on a beautiful, fruitful hill, 
strong by nature, from its insulated 
situation in the middle of a deep and 
broad valley, and rendered still more 
so by the fortifications that were 
erected for its defence. Dr. Robinson 
says, that “it would be difficult to 


CHAP. XXVIII. | 


ISATAH. 


241 


Which is upon the head of the rich valley 
Of them that are vanquished by wine. 
2 Behold, a strong and a powerful one of Jehovah, 


find, in all Palestine, a situation of 
equal strength, fertility, and beauty 
combined. In all these particulars 
it has greatly the advantage over 
Jerusalem.” Bib. Research. iii. p. 
146.. It was built by Omri, king of 
Israel, and became a place of great 
splendour and luxury under the fol- 
‘lowing monarchs, especially under 
Ahab and Jeroboam II. 1 Kings xxii. 
39; Amos ii. 15, iv. 1, 2. It was 
repeatedly attacked by Ben-hadad, 
king of Syria, but held out against 
him, though reduced to great ex- 
tremity. 2 Kings vi. vii. It was 
afterwards taken, after a siege of three 
years, by Shalmaneser, king of As- 
syria, who exercised great cruelties 
en its inhabitants, and reduced it to 
a heap ofruins, 2 Kings xvii. 6,7, &c. ; 
Micah i.6; Hos. x. 14, 15. In this 
overthrow was fulfilled the present 
prophecy, which was, in all proba- 
bility, delivered a few years previous 
to the reign of Hezekiah. See verse 
5—7. It raised itself somewhat, and 
was again depressed in after times, 
till, finally, it was restored by Herod 
the Great, who gave it the name of 
Sebaste, in honour of Augustus; a 
name retained by the small village that 
now occupies its site. A beautiful 
colonnade still remains to attest to 
its former splendour. See the travels 
of Maundrell, Richardson, and Buck- 
ingham.—Cities built on eminences, 
and especially fortified cities thus 
situated, were naturally compared to 
a crown. It is to this circumstance 
the prophet refers, and not to the 
chaplets, or wreaths of flowers, worn 
by the ancients at banquets, as some 
have imagined. The passage quoted 
by Lowth from Wisdom ii. 7, 8, aptly 
describes such custom, but throws no 
light upon the present text. Samaria 
was the proud boast of the dissipated 
inhabitants of the country, and es- 
pecially of its own inhabitants ; but 
it was hastening to its fall, and is on 
this account compared to the flowers 
with which persons were crowned, 


which soon decayed. It has been 
doubted whether the drunkenness 
here adverted to is to be taken lite- 
rally, or whether it is to be under- 
stood figuratively of mental infatua- 
tion ; a8 we say, intoxicated with 
pleasure, zeal, &. Thus the LXX. οἱ 
μεθύοντες ἄνευ οἴνου. That the former 
is the more probable, appears from 
the prevalence of this sin among the 
Samaritans, (see Amos iv. 1, which sets 
forth a most depraved state of morals;) 
and from the character of the Jews, 
ver. 7, which is evidently exhibited as 
parallel to that of the Ephraimites. 
Comp. also, Amos vi. 1, 6, and Hos. 
vil. 5. pO, smitten of wine, i. e. 
overcome by it, iutoxicated. The 
phrase corresponds to 05%, drunkards, 
at the beginning of the verse. The 


Arabs similarly use «JS, vicit et 


inebriavit eum vinum dactylorum ; 


go>) secuit vem, percussit, inebriavit 


potus ; - ye? prostravit, ts} wre 
prostratus poculi ᾿ς «Ὁ, percussit, VII. 


victus vino fuit. 'Thusalso the Greeks, 
μεθυπλήξ, οἰνοπλήξ ; and the Latins, 
multo percussus tempora Baccho. 
Tibull. 1, 2,3. oy20, fatnesses, being 
merely a noun used adjectively to 
qualify 3, which, as to sense, is the 
noun strictly in construction with 
wav, it was left in the absolute 
state. Hitzig thinks it was so left to 
prevent the termination of three 
words in*. 

2. Instead of "χοῦ, a vast number of 
MSS., and the first three printed 
editions, read, 717°, which must be re- 
garded as the original lection. The 
? simply marks the dative of posses- 
sion: “a mighty and powerful instru- 
ment, whom the Lord will raise up 
and employ in executing his anger 
upon the ten tribes.” This instru- 
ment was Shalmaneser, king of As- 
syria, by whom Samaria was taken, 
after a powerful resistance, about the 


bo 
Aid 
bo 


ISAIAH. 


(CHAP. XXVIIJ. 


Like a hail-storm, like a destructive tempest, 
Like a flood of mighty overflowing water, 
Casteth it to the ground with force. 
3 With the feet shall be trodden in pieces 
The proud crowns of the drunkards of Ephraim. 
4 And the fading flower of their glorious beauty, 
That is upon the head of the rich valley, 
Shall be as the early fig before the summer harvest, 
Which one looketh at, and while it is yet in his hand 


He swalloweth it. 


5 In that day shall Jehovah of Hosts 


year B.C. 721. Before ww, subaud. 3, 
as carried forward in idea from O73. 
For the force of 222 comp. FMR, 22, 


ΞΡ, 207, 227, Chald. 297, Arab. bs, 


all of which verbs convey the idea of 
cutting, cutting off, exscinding, το. Ty 
usually signifies to let down or place 
gently ; bat is here, as in Numb. xix. 
9, and Amos v. 7, employed in the 
sense of throwing, casting down. V3 
immediately following, as well as the 
nature of the case, shews this. The 
nomin. is Shalmaneser. 

3. 725977 being in the plural, Lowth 
and others would read minoy, but all 
the ancient versions have the singular, 
and there is no variety in the MSS. 
To obviate the apparent difficulty, the 
Rabbins explain MY as a collective ; 
but we have other instances of the 
third plur. femin. of the future used 
for the third singular, as Exod. i. 10, 
mon. MAP; Judg. v. 26, Twn AT ; 
Job xvii. ‘16, MTN MPM ; and such 
construction alone suits the con- 
nexion. I would suggest, however, 
that in all such cases the 73 is a form 
of intensity rather than of plurality. 

4, bai nse for nos mys; like awn 
for No 7733, Prov. xxiv. 25, The 
participle is used as an abstract noun, 
to serve the purpose of an adjective. 
The change of gender in 72" is merely 
to vary the form, ver. 1. 3, ¢he 


early fig, Arab. ΩΣ Boccora, from 723, 
to bear early or first, as fruit, children, 


&e. Aq. πρωτογέννημαα LXX. πρό- 
ἕρομος σύκου. It 15. a peculiar kind, 


which, after a mild winter, ripens 
about the end of June, and sometimes 
earlier; whereas, the summer and 
winter figs do not come to maturity 
till the months of August and Novem- 
ber. It surpasses these in relish ; and 
is on this account, as well as that of 
its early appearance, eagerly desired 
by the inhabitants of the East. While 
the others hang long upon the tree 
after they become ripe, the boccora 
drops immediately on the tree being 
slightly shaken by the hand, or even 
of itself, Jer. xxiv. 2; Hos. ix. 10; 
Micah vii. 1. It is from these circum- 
stances the prophet here borrows his 
image, in order to shew how suddenly 
and easily Samaria should be taken. 
A three years’ siege must have been 
reckoned short in ancient times, since 
that of Tyre, under Nebuchadnezzar, 
lasted thirteen, and that of Askalon 
twenty-nine years. The 7 in 723 is 
to be read without the Mappic. 8% 
m57, which Lowth ventures to call “a 
miserable tautology,” and which, after 
Houbigant, he alters to T8177 Mx, is to 
be retained as good Hebrew. See 
chap. xvi. 10, and xxviii. 34, Besides, 
the idea of plucking the early fig would 
quite spoil the beauty of the figure. 
‘822 AT3, Zwinglius forcibly renders : 


ferme priusquam in manum venerit. 


5, 6. Having predicted the speedy 
downfal of the apostate kingdom, 
which was accompanied by the trans- 
portation of the people beyond the 
Euphrates, Isaiah directs attention to 
the manifestations of Divine favour 
to be experienced by the kingdom of 

e 


CHAP. XXVIII. | 


ISAIAH, 


243 


Become a glorious crown and a beautiful diadem, 


To the residue of his people : 


6 And a spirit of judgment to him that sitteth on the bench, 
And prowess to those who drive back the battle to the gate. 
7 Yet even these err through wine, 
And reel through strong drink ; 
The priest and the prophet err through strong drink ; 
They are overpowered with wine; they reel through strong 


drink ; 


They err in vision ; they stagger in judgment. 
8 For all tables are full of vomit and filth ; 


There is no place clean. 


Judah. God would be the protection 
and boast of his remaining tribes ; he 
would endow their judges with dis- 
cernment in matters pertaining to 
the legal tribunals, and their warriors 
with power to drive back into their 
own cities any enemies that might 
invade the land. x77 oY: cannot, 
without violence, be interpreted of 
any other period than that to which 
reference had just been made. It 
comprehends the reign of pious Heze- 
kiah. ype, a diadem, or crown, 50 
called from the wreaths round the 
head, of which it consisted. Arab. 


ye pleauit, torsit ; ὃ ARS : pee, 
erines plexi. Eth. RG_,e.= torsit, con- 
torsit, plexuit. BOAT 15. put ellipti- 
cally for HEWDT NED, on the seat or 
throne of justice. Comp. Ps. ix. 5. 
Before 22 supply ?. 72079, battle or 
war, for 7977) Hx, foreign warriors. 
mw, “to the gate,” ἡ. 6. of the enemy; 
not only repelling his attack in Judea, 
but driving him back into his own 


fortified places. The 7 is that of di- 
rection or motion. Comp. 1 Sam. 
xvii. 52. 


7, 8. The predicted prosperity, 
however, would only be of short con- 
tinuance : the teachers and rulers of 
Judah would soon resemble those of 
Ephraim in sottishness and impiety. 
Most expositors refer this description 
to the state of things in Judah at the 
time when Isaiah wrote ; but it seems 
preferable to apply it to that in the 


reign of Manasseh, which he here 
predicts. To express the great in- 
temperance in which they would in- 
dulge, he employs synonymes and 
repetitions ; and points out its influ- 
ence on their official character. ¥922 
mary, lit. they are swallowed up by 


v 
wine; Syr. “SND, prevaluit, vicit, 
absorpsit, devoravit; Arab. ey, per- 


venit, contegit, percenit ad finem ; victt, 
afiixit aliquem, cum uy? oceupavit 


eum totum res; to be entirely under the 
influence of any thing. 'The persons 
referred to had given themselves so 
completely up to the influence of 
wine, as to have destroyed their 
character and salutary influence in 
society. There is a manifest allusion 
to the greediness with which they 
emptied their cups. What they had 
thus swallowed might be said, by its 
overpowering influence, to swallow or 
absorb them, as it destroyed their 
mental and moral vigour. Comp. Hos. 
iv. 11. The prepositions 3 and Ὁ are 
here evidently equivalent. 75, as the 
participle of 7}, properly signifies ὦ 
seer, and is the ancient name for 
prophet; but it is here used as an 
abstract noun, with the acceptation 
of vision ; as M7 is, ver. 15, for cove- 
nant or agreement. ΓΒ occurs only 
here in Kal; but from the connexion, 
as well as from its use in Hiph., Jer, 
x. 4, and its derivatives, D5, that 


944 ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XXVIII. 


9 Whom should he teach knowledge ? 
And whom should he cause to understand the report ? 
Those who are weaned from the milk ; 
Those who are removed from the breasts. 

10 For there is precept by precept, precept by precept ; 


Rule by rule, rule by rule ; 
A little here, a little there. 


which makes to stagger or fall, and ΡΞ, a 
tottering or wavering, it clearly signifies 
to move unsteadily, to act in a wavering, 
undecided manner, which, in giving 
judgment, is to be reprobated. Comp. 


the Arab. E)s, fregit, fractus fuit ; 
luwatus et loco motus fuit; τ ΚΑΘ, 


fatuus fuit. There seems no ground 
for the acceptation, judgment-seat, tri- 
bunal, which Gesenius ascribes to 
mode. It is used adverbially for 7753, 
z.e. in performing that wherein the 
judicial office consists ; judging, giving 
sentence: the 3 being as freq. omitted 
in the second member of the parallel- 
ism. Perhaps the 7 is added to in- 
timate the feebleness and inefficiency 
of such judgments as they pro- 
nounced. The eighth verse forcibly 
depicts the loathsome character, and 
the extent of the abomination. 782 x’? 
is an asyndeton. See chap. xxvii. 5. 

9, 10. These verses contain the 
taunting language of the drunken 
priests and judges of the Jews, who 
repel with scorn the idea that they 
should require the plain and reiterated 
lessons which Jehovah taught by his 
messengers. Such elementary in- 
struction was fit only for babes: it 
was an insult to their understanding 
to suppose that they stood in need of 
it. That the nominative to τὺ and 
ὙΦ is Jehovah, or the prophet, teach- 
ing by his authority, seems beyond 
all doubt. The last two members of 
ver. 9 contain answers to the ques- 
tions proposed in the first two, and 
are not a continuation of the inter- 
rogatives, as Gesenius and others sup- 
pose. I ‘nn? and DIN Why are 
instances of construction with a pre- 
position between the nouns. Comp. 
Ezek. xiii. 2; Hos. vii. 5. The lan- 
guage of ver. 10, 2 2 2 18) WI 


OW Yyt OW Yyr 172, more resembles that 
of inebriated persons, than any used 
by persons in a state of sobriety. The 
words are obviously selected to suit 
the character of those supposed to 
employ them; and, by their mono- 
syllabic and repetitious forms, admi- 
rably express the initiatory process of 
tuition, which they indignantly de- 
spised. “ Mirasunt hic Anadiploses.” 
Zwing. %2 is used Hos. v. 11, as here, 
in the acceptation of precept or com- 
mand, from ™3, in Piel, to appoint, 
charge, command ; usually M32. %, lit. 


a line or cord, Arab., 845, the same, 
from use? to twist, bind, ἕο. It is 


here used metaphorically for Jaw, rule, 
&c., which marks out the ἐμ of con- 
duct men ought to pursue. The LXX., 
mistaking the 1 in 1 for Ἢ, as they did 
Tin ver. 9, rendering 727, κακὰ ; and 
deriving \7 from ™p, fo wait for, expect, 
translate thus: Θλίψιν ἐπὶ θλίψιν 
προσδέχου, ἐλπίδα ἐπ᾽ ἐλπίδι, ἔτι μικρὸν 
ἔτι μικρὸν. The Syriac translator, 
still less to the purpose, amplifies the 
statement made ver. 8,—in all proba- 
bility misled by the resemblance of 
the words. He is, however, followed 
by Michaelis. The hypothesis of Ge- 


‘senius, that there may be a reference 


to successive additions of laws, &c., 
in the Pentateuch, made by prophets 
in the days of the kings, could only 
have been forced into this passage by 
the spirit of unbelief, which obsti- 
nately denies the authenticity and 
antiquity of that portion of the sacred 
volume. See, for their able vindica- 
tion against the attempts of this 
author, Gramberg, Hartmann, De 
Wette, and others, the Rev. H. J. 
Rose’s Hulsean Lectures for 1833, and 
Die Authentie des Pentateuchs, by 
Hengstenberg; Berlin, 1836—1838. 


4 eee 


CHAP. XXVIII.| 


ISATAH. 


11 Nay, but with barbarous lips, and in another tongue, 


He will speak to this people ; 
12 Because he said to them: 


This is the rest; give rest to the weary ; 


And this is the tranquillity ; 


But they were unwilling to hear. 


The words are often preposterously 
quoted in application to the abundant 
possession of religious privileges. Both 
this verse and ver. 13 convey the idea 
of paucity, or a mere outline of in- 
struction, and not that of fulness. 
DvV—owv, here—there. 

11, Ὁ has here, after the interroga- 
tions, a strongly implied negative 
force. Comp. Job xiv. 16, xxxi. 18. 
The verse contains a Divine threaten- 
ing against the scoffers. “Jus talionis 
indicatur,” Schmid. The language 
they employed in cavilling at the pro- 
phetic warnings was all but barbarous, 
it consisted of barely intelligible 
sounds: they should, by way of con- 
dign punishment, hear the foreign, and 
to them apparently mocking accents 
of the Chaldeans, whom God would 
employ as the interpreters of his 
severe but righteous will. Comp. Jer. 
v. 15, where the language of the Chal- 
dzeans is declared to be unintelligible 
to the Jews,—i2) vin ND 2,—either 
because it was that spoken by the 
Northern tribes which emigrated into 
Babylon, or because the Semitic dialect 
spoken in Babylon differed so much 
from that of the Hebrews as not to 
be understood by them. In this dia- 
lect, DTHD 1), it was necessary for 
Daniel and his companions to receive 
instruction, Dan. i. 4. Comp. also 
chap. xxxili. 19.7 »2w, lit. arbarians 
of, or as to lip: i.e. those who speak a 
barbarous or foreign language. Comp. 


ν 
the Syr. RSS balbutivit ; 30> 


fiNscko Les, gut ut subsannantes 
loquuntur. Liber Adami, i. 324, 7. 


Arab. dels), impuritas, barbarismus. 


The passage is employed by Paul, 1 
Cor, xiv. 20, 21, quite in the spirit of 
the connexion in which it here stands, 


He tacitly compares the Corinthian 
faction, which boasted of the faculty 
of speaking in unknown tongues, to 
the puerile characters adverted to ver. 
9, (παιδία, νηπιάζετε, &e.) and then 
reminds them, that speaking in such 
languages had been represented in the 
Jewish Scriptures—év τῷ vopo—as a 
punishment, or a mark of the Divine 
displeasure, and not as a matter of 
desire or envy. The quotation agrees 
neither with the words of the Heb. 
text, nor with those of the LXX., but 
it corresponds verbally with the ver- 
sion marked ᾿Αλλ. in Origen’s Poly- 
glott. 

12. To take 1x as the relative pro- 
noun, would, in this connexion, be in- 
tolerably-harsh. Gesenius treats it as 
redundant, or, at least, as merely a 
connecting particle. It seems clearly. 
to be used in its causal sense: decuuse, 
and is equivalent to Tx p>, Ws non, 
Jehovah had, by his messengers, 
pointed out to the priests and judges 
the only means by which they could 
secure and enjoy true tranquillity ; viz. 
faith and obedience; and he had 
charged them to teach these means to 
the people, in order that they might 
be relieved from the molestations 
which defection from the Divine law 
had occasioned; but all had been in 
vain. ΤΟΣ occurs only in this place ; 
but it is evident from its being in ap- 
position with m2, and from the 
meaning of yYi272, Jer. vi. 16, that it is 
derived from the Hiph. of 2x, ¢o give 


rest, quiet, ἕο. Comp. the Arab. ey 
bené vertit, beneque cessit illi ; ere 


reditus, which in the Koran is used of 
the happiness of true believers in 


a future world. Thus Sur. x. 4, ἀαὶ 


Les phe mpe: The final 8 in N28 js 


H H 


240 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP, XXVIII. 


13 Verily, the word of Jehovah shall be to them, 
Precept by precept, precept by precept ; 


Rule by rule, rule by rule; 
A little here, a little there: 


That they may continue to fall backwards, and be broken, 


And be snared, and taken. 
14 


Wherefore, hear ye the word of Jehovah, 


Ye scoffers, who rule this people that are in Jerusalem, 


15 Because ye say: 


We have made a contract with death, 
And with Sheol we have made an agreement: » 
The overflowing scourge, when it passeth through, shall not 


reach us, 


For we have made falsehood our refuge, 
And in deceit have we hid ourselves. 
16 Nevertheless, thus saith the Lord Jehovah : 


otiant, as in Josh. x. 24, 907. This 
orthography is prevalent in Arabic, as 


Vy poe |,Las. A great number of Co- 


dices, however, and the Soncin. edi- 
tions, omit the x. 

13, A repetition of the cavilling lan- 
guage of the drunkards, ver. 10. The 
meaning is: They may despise the in- 
struction given to them as puerile, 
and altogether below the mark to 
which they imagine they have at- 
tained, but they shall have no other; 
and being thus left to act according to 
the dictates of their own supposed 
wisdom, they must utterly perish. 
Comp. 1 Pet, ii. 8. There is a marked 
gradation in the verbs employed in 
the latter part of the verse, and their 
accumulation is designed to express 
the certainty and grievous nature of 
the predicted ruin. 72 is here used in 
a frequentative sense. 

14, 15. A further description of the 
character of the impious rulers of the 
Jews. ΠΕΣ ἌΝ, men of scorn, for D>, 
scorners. Syram.and Theod. χλευασταί. 
R.  y?, ¢o stammer, speak barbarously, 


deride, mock. Comp. the Arab. (oY; 


anigmatice locutus est. Conj. TV. con- 
vertit, contortus, convolutus fuit. 202 
mh DY, Jarchi, Abenezra, Houbigant, 


Ἐπ 


" 


Lowth, Boothroyd, Luzzatto, and 
Scholz, render: “Ye of this people 
who mock,” or “use sententious say- 
ings;” but such interpretation is 
quite forced, as the construct state 
shews. Comp. chap. lii. 5; Jer. xxx. 
21. mh, LXX. συνθήκη; Targ. x20; 
Vulg. pactum. The word properly sig- 
nifies vision, like n3n, which stands for 
it, ver. 18. The form is participial, 
from 1m, Zo see, have a divine oracle, &c. 
see chap. i. 1,and is synonymous with 
™:; both conveying the idea of a reli- 
gious sanction, inviolability, &. Comp. 


however, the Arab. djs, dissensit, et 


contra, consensit, concordavit ; Con}. VI. 
Jedus pepiygerunt. Comp. 017 as simi- 
larly used, ver. 18. For oY, or, as it 
is properly given in the Keri, iv, see 
chap. x. 26. "NW Οὐδ᾽ is obviously a 
paronomasia, which confirms the read- 
ing of the Keri. The following 129, on 
the contrary, (read 729,) is to be pre- 
ferred to 732°, prescribed by the Keri. 
The language is that of daring and 
reckless spirits. 

16. Before proceeding to denounce 
the Divine judgments against these 
mockers, and all unbelievers who 
might adhere to them as their leaders, 
the prophet, in this verse, describes 
the provision made by Jehovah for 


CHAP, ΧΧΥΠΙ.] 


ISATAH. 


247 


Behold, I will lay for a foundation in Zion a stone, 
A tried stone, a precious corner-stone, a solid foundation ; 


the indestructible security of his 
people. The more forcibly to point 
out this security, he introduces the 
image of a large, firm, and noble 
foundation-stone, which at once gives 
support and union to the building 
erected upon it. That this foundation 
is exclusively, and not merely sensu 
sublimiori, Christ our Saviour, no one 
can call in question, who allows the 
inspired authority of the N. T. For 
the passage is not only quoted, in part, 
with such direct application, Rom. ix. 
33, x. 11, but in its entire form, with 
one or two slight verbal discrepancies, 
1 Pet. 11. 6, with the same primary and 
immediate reference. That the earlier 
Jews applied it, in like manner, to the 
Messiah, appears from the fact, that 
though the word yw is not μοῖρ in 
the text of the Targum, which reads, 
PON) Waa PD YN APP PED 22 NP NT, 
“ Behold, I constitute in Zion a king, a 
king strong, mighty, and terrible,” it 
must originally have occupied a place 
after the first 7272. This appears, first, 
from the quotation made of this text 
from the Targum, by Raymund Mar- 
tini, in his Pugio Fidei, Pars II. chap. 
v. p. 342. Edit. Carpzov. It is true, 
the word is there written ™wnn, and 
not xm@™owd; but this seems a mere 
inadvertence, which has arisen from 
the combination mwnn 7 being so 
common in Jewish writings. Second- 
ly, from the proneness of this Tar- 
gumist to introduce the term, or its 
equivalent, into all the passages in 
which he speaks of the promised 
Deliverer asa king. See chap. ix. 6, 
ΣΙ ΧΕ ΟΣ xxvii. 5. ‘That Solo- 
mon Jarchi found the word ih the 
version appears from his exposition of 
the passage: °N7oyM 1259 AM AND 729 
Ta AN PMA Pn, “Tt is already fixed 
and determined before me, and I have 
constituted King Messiah a tried stone, 
&c.” Gesenius, and a few other inter- 
preters, after the Rabbins, suppose 
Hezekiah to be meant,—an interpre- 
tation which was already broached, 
most likely by the Jews, in the time 
of Theodoret, who gives his opinion 


of it thus: ᾿Ανοίας ἐσχάτης εἶναι νομίζω 
τὸ ταύτην τῷ ᾿Εζεκίᾳ προσαρμόζειν τὴν 
προφητείαν, “ I deem it the greatest folly 
to apply this prophecy to Hezekiah ;” 
and then goes on to shew, that, as it 
would be perfectly repugnant to the 
doctrine of Scripture, to require any 
to put confidence in man, no one can 
possibly be intended but 6 δεσπότης 
Χριστὸς, the Lord Christ. Rosenmiller 
acknowledges that the predicates here 
exhibited are majora et augustiora, than 
to admit of being applied to an earthly 
prince ; and even Hitzig scouts the 
idea of Hezekiah being in any sense 
intended. The introduction of an 
abrupt but direct prophecy of the 
Messiah, into the midst of a discourse 
respecting the judgments with which 
his nation was to be visited, is quite 
in the style of Isaiah. See chap. iv. 
2, vii. 14, ix. 1—6, xi.1. It served to 
assure the faithful, that, notwithstand- 
ing the most threatening calamities, 
the house of David, from which the 
Messiah was to spring, should not be 
destroyed. δ᾽ 2217, Gesenius, Rosen- 
miller, and others, consider to be 
elliptical for 15) 1x x72, Lam he 
who hath laid, &c.; and appeal to the 


analogy of the Arab. as, ὃ] ee Lal, 


it is only I that rose, in which the first 
person is combined with the third. 
There can be no doubt, however, that, 
according to the uniform usage of the 
Hebrew, the punctuation should be 
πρὸ ; the participle always following "237, 
but the third person never. Gesenius 
seems to have been sensible of this, 
for in his Lexicons he only adduces 
the present passage in proof of a 
finite verb following the suffix of the 
interjection. "PY 235, chap. xxix. 14, 
xxxviii. 5, he allows to be a participial 
form for DY, and only objects to 10’ on 
the ground that it would give a future 
signification to the word, which he is 
unwilling to admit. All the ancient 
versions, however, translate the verb in 
the future, which I have not scrupled 
to do, partly on their authority, 
which, in such cases, is at least equal 


248 


ἸΒΑΙΑΗ. 


[CHAP. XXVIII. 


He that believeth shall not make haste. 
17 But I will make judgment a line, 


to that of the punctators; but chiefly 
in conformity with the grammatical 
law allowed by Gesenius.—j28 is here 
equivalent to ὋΣ, a rock, or large stone. 
Both words are applied metaphorically 
to God, as the refuge and support of 
his people. Comp. Matt. xvi. 18; 
Ps. exvili. 22; in which places the 


Syr. has [929 as in the present text. 


172 occurs only here as a noun, but it 
is used in Pual with the same points, 
Ezek. xxi. 18 (Eng. 13). The verb pro- 
perly signifies fo try metals, and is thus 
synonymous with Pz; but it is also 
used for trying, or examining in any way. 
The idea conveyed in this place, is 
that of adaptation, or fitness, to answer 
the proposed end: large, compact, strong; 
ΡΠ, as the Targ. gives it. The stone 
is itself the subject of trial or proof ; 
so that the notion of a touch-stone, 
which some have attempted to intro- 
duce into the text, is altogether ex- 
cluded. The words, 151 191 ΠῚ 728, 
are literally, a@ corner-stone of precious- 
ness of ὦ well-founded, i. 6. solid, founda- 
tion; and the meaning is, a costly 
corner-stone firmly laid as a founda- 
tion. 138, az angle or corner, from 738, 


to turn; ἃ turning point. Arab. a, 


dus, extremum temporis, pars extremi- 


tasve seculi. It signifies the stone laid 
at the point where the two sides of a 
building meet. LXX. ἀκρογωνιαῖον. 
The term is used Ps. exviii. 22, where 
m5 Ux should be rendered, the princi- 
pal corner-stone. Comp. Zech. iv. 7, 
MON Ἰ2 τ, the principal stone. In both 
these passages the reference is not to 
the summit or completion of the 
edifice, but to its foundation, 7. ὁ. the 
Messiah :— ὄντος ἀκρογωνιαίου αὐτοῦ 
᾿Ιησοῦ Χριστοῦ, Eph. 11. 20. ΠΡ» is not 
in the absolute state, as Kimchi would 
have it, but forms, in construction 
with the following 709, a genitive of 
object. It otherwise qualifies 725, ex- 
pressing its intrinsic excellence and 
value. The Hebrews use ni? 0228 to 
denote not merely gems or precious 
stones, but also marble and other 


valuable stones of a large size em- 
ployed in magnificent . buildings, 1 
Kings v. 31, (ver. 17, Eng. Ver.) 
2 Chron. iii. 6. For the sake of 
greater solidity, stones of immense 
size were anciently employed as the 
foundations of temples. Parsons, de- 
scribing the ruins of one which he 
visited at Baalbec, mentions a corner- 
stone that he found, on measuring, to 
be twenty-eight feet long, six feet six 
inches wide, and four feet six inches 
thick. (Letters from Palestine, p.73.) 
The repetition, 121 15%, is emphatic, 
and is well expressed by Zwinglius : 
ad firmissimum fundamentum. For simi- 
lar instances of substantives followed 
by verbs of the same root in the 
Pual participle, see Exod. xii. 9 ; Ps. 
lxiv. 7; Prov. xxx. 24. wm), Aq., 
Symm.,and Theod., render, οὐ σπεύσει; 
Vulg. non festinet ; LUXX. οὐ μὴ καταισ- 
χυνθῇ, which is quoted literally, 1 Pet. 
u. 6, and with the trifling variation, 
οὐ καταισχυνθήσεται, Rom. ix. 333 
Targ. por xd, shall not be moved ; 


Syr. Saad 2 ii, shall not be afraid. 


The verb ΟἿ primarily signifies ¢o 
make haste, flee quickly; but, in its 
secondary or derived senses, may in- 
clude all the varieties of interpreta- 
tion here given. Comp. the Arab. 


a . . Sn . . 
Url, concitavit circumveniens, ut in 
retia ageret (feram.) V. erubuit. VII. 


territus fugit. eile, res a qua abhor- 


rent homines, cujusque pudet, Ure, 
terrore perculsus fuit. ners] Ui 
qui cito conficit opus. ‘The meaning is, 
that those who believe the Divine de- 
claration, and thus rest for safety on 
the foundation here promised, shall 
feel themselves so perfectly secure, 
that they shall never have occasion to 
suspect their confidence ; or, under 
the impulse of fear and shame, to be- 
take themselves with speed to another 
refuge. It is a security which can 
never fail. 

17. We have in this and the verses 


CHAP. XXVIII. | 


ISAIAH. 


249 


And righteousness a plumb-line ; 
And the hail shall sweep away the refuge of falsehood, 
And the waters shall wash away the hiding-place. 


18 


Yea, your contract with death shall be annulled, 


And your agreement with Sheol shall not stand ; 
When the overflowing scourge shall pass through, 
Ye shall be for him to trample upon. 


19 


As often as it passeth through, it shall take you away ; 


For every morning it shall pass through ; 


By day and by night; 


And it shall be a terror only to hear the rumour of it. 
20 For the bed is too short for one to stretch himself at length, 


immediately following, in striking con- 
trast with the safety of the righteous 
just described, the miserable and 
helpless condition of those who trust 
in refuges of their own devising. God 
threatens to adapt his righteous judg- 
ments so exactly to the circumstances 
of the impious Jews, that every way 
of escape should be completely re- 
moved. 7 occurs only here ; but, 
from the connexion, as well as from 


the signification of the Arab. shy 


congregavit, et collegit rem, excitavit, 
extirpavit, it is clearly equivalent to 
ἮΝ, to gather violently, take away, 
destroy. Comp. FDY, 7D, PD, all of 
which have, in common, the idea of 
scraping, sweeping together ; then that 
of sweeping away ; hence 75D, a sweep- 
ing storm, used of the whirlwind. 


Comp. also 9", a shovel; Arab. ust 


repositorium, into which things are 
collected; and the Eth Φ ὦν: 
which is, however, limited to the 
removal or destruction of .any thing 
by burning. Hail and inundations 
are frequently used figuratively to 
denote formidable enemies, or calami- 
tous events. Chap. viii. 7, 8, xxxii. 
2,19; Ezek. xiii. 11, 13. 


18. 752, Arab. pe pe» to cover, 


when applied to a covenant or con- 
tract, properly signifies so to cover 
the tablet, containing the terms of the 
agreement, with wax, as completely 


to obliterate the writing, and thus to 
cancel and render it of no effect. 
Symm. ἐξαλειφθήσεται. Comp. Colos. 
ii. 14. Being placed, as the predicate, 
before the subject, the verb may be 
in the masculine gender. OD is 
femin. because it follows the femin. 
noun. See Ewald, § 567, and Mi- 
chaelis’ Arab. Gram. § 55, 4. The 
conjecture of Houbigant, of which 
Secker and Lowth approve, that the 
text originally read 75n, is without 
foundation. The Targum, to which 
they appeal, does not profess to give 
the word, but merely its signification. 
For m7, see on ver. 15. In using the 
words D212) 1) on, the prophet drops 
the figure, and describes in plain terms 
the invading foe, and the destruction 
which he should effect. 

19. "7, compounded of %, plenty, 


sufficiency. Arab. i 90, medicatus futt, 
opem tulit ; ol » tacrassuit, multus 


evasit ; and Ὁ, the preposition, is em- 
ployed to denote correspondent fre- 
quency : as often as, whenever. 7, only, 
is to be connected with p2n, and not 
with 723. Comp. Ps. xxxii. 6. 

20. 2—2, here, and ver. 21, are cor- 
relative, and causal. vv, 4o make long, 
stretch out at length. Comp. the Arab. 


ey protendit, spoken of camels 
stretching out their necks ; duc] we 


camels with long necks ; ie Gy 


250 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP, XXVIII. 


And the covering too narrow for one to wrap himself in. 


21 


For Jehovah shall rise up as in Mount Perazim, 


He will be angry as in the valley of Gibeon ; 
To perform his act, his strange act ; 
And to execute his work, his unusual work. 


Now, therefore, indulge not in scoffing, 


Lest your bonds be strengthened ; 
For of a determined devastation I have heard, 
From the Lord Jehovah of Hosts, concerning all the land. 


23 Give ear, and hear my voice ; 


Attend, and hear my speech. 


hasta longa ; Lene pits The 


language of this verse is in all proba- 
‘bility proverbial, and feelingly ex- 
presses the insufficiency of the means 
resorted to for defence and comfort. 
21. The reference is to the histo- 
rical facts narrated 2 Sam. v. 17—25 ; 
1 Chron. xiv. 8—17 ; and the meaning 
is, that the persons spoken of should 
be treated as were the Philistines by 
David. The coupling together of the 
two places here specified, shews that 
by i222 we are not to understand the 
Gibeon mentioned Josh. x., but a place 
of the same name, near the valley of 
Rephaim. Instead of 533, Gibcon, 
1 Chron. xiv. 16, we find in 2 Sam. v. 
25, 22, Geba. As the word properly 
signifies a fill, it came to be applied 
to many of the elevated places in 
Palestine. The strange and unusual 
conduct ascribed to Jehovah, is his 
not only punishing the Jews, instead 
of punishing their enemies, but his 
punishing them with ἃ severity 


, longus. 


which they had never before expe-. 


rienced. Such the destruction of 
Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar proved ; 
and such, in a still more eminent 
sense, was the character of its destruc- 
tion by Titus. Contrary to the 
common usage of the grammar, the 
adjectives Ἢ and ΤΡῚΣ are placed before 
their substantives, as chap. liii. 11, 
“ay paz. The reason seems obviously 
to be, to give a greater degree of 
prominence to the ideas conveyed by 
them, or to render them more em- 
phatic.. 


22. The prophet directly addresses 
the scoffers, 2°28, mentioned ver. 
14, γε, the Hithpal. of y, has a 
reflexive power, give not yourselves to 
mockery, indulge not in scoffing. ΝΟ, 
bond, is here used metaphorically of 
the punishment inflicted on trans- 
gressors. By continuing in their 
wicked and profane courses, they in- 
cur heavier guilt, and expose them- 
selves to more fearful destruction. 
To this destruction, declared in the 
latter half of the verse to be deter- 
mined with respect to the whole land, 
they must inevitably be subject, if 
they repent not. For 72772) 73, see 
on chap. x. 23. 

23. This verse is introductory to 
the following beautiful agricultural 
parable, in which the prophet teaches, 
that, in his government of human 
affairs, in his employment of means 
for the improvement of mankind, and 
especially in his appointment of pro- 
vidential chastisements, Jehovah does 
not act arbitrarily, or without discri- 
mination ; but, on the contrary, the 
methods which he employs are various, 
in adaptation to the difference of per- 
sons, times, and circumstances. As 
the husbandman varies his treatment 
of the soil, and allots to each species 
of seed its proper place ; and, after the 
harvest has been gathered in, uses 
such instruments as are suitable for 
separating the ditferent kinds of grain 
from the straw and the chaff ; so God 
takes different measures in his treat- 
ment of men—assigning to them their 
stations, furnishing them with the 


CHAP. ΧΧΥΠΠ. 


ISATAH. 


24 Is the ploughman always ploughing in order to sow ? 
Is he always opening and levelling his ground ? 


25 


When he hath made the surface of it even, 


Doth he not scatter the dill, and cast abroad the cummin, 


And set the wheat in rows, 


The barley in the place marked out for it, 


And the spelt in his border? 
26 
He instructeth him. 


means of improvement, and exactly 
adapting his judgments to their 
various degrees of guilt. However 
severe might be the punishment im- 
pending over the Jewish people, it was 
not greater than their sins deserved. 
The immediate design of the parable 
seems to have been to repel a tacit 
objection of the scoffers, parallel to 
that stated 2 Pet. iii. 4. “ Where is 
the promise of his coming? for since 
the fathers fell asleep, all things con- 
tinue as they were from the beginning 
of the creation.” 

24. 07%, lit. all the day, an idiom 
for always, continually. See Gen. vi.5 ; 
Ps. 111. 3; Isa.lxv.5. 71 occurs only, 
as here, in Piel,.but is obviously used 
in the acceptation of levelling the 
ground by harrowing. Comp.the Arab. 


Conj. II. 


rectum fecit ; convenientem aptumque 
reddidit. 71, a level tract, field, &c. 
25. TP, a species of cummin, called 
by the ancients, gith, melanthium, and 
nigella, from the black colour of the 
seed. It reaches the height of a cubit, 
ει has leaves resembling those of a fennel 
plant, and a blue, poppy-like flower. 
It corresponds to our dil/, or black 
cummin, and was used both for food 
and medicine. Plin. lib. xix. cap. 8, 
xx. cap. 17 ; Cels. Hierobot. Pars II. 
p. 70. mv, Talm. mv, @ line, series, 


dw, egualis, rectus fuit ; 


row ; Arab. By» linea struesve una 


lapidum in muro ; signifies the rows in 
which Oriental husbandmen plant 
wheat, millet, &c. instead of sowing 
them, as with us. Thus Jerome, per 
ordinem ; Zwinglius, serie sua; which 
is preferable to the rendering, “ prin- 


For his God teacheth him rightly ; 


cipal,’ of our common version, and 
“in due measure,” which is that of 
Abenezra, Kimchi, Lowth, and others. 
7202, used adverbially for 722 Dips, ἐμ 
the place appointed, i.e. raarked out for 
it. The root is not found in Heb. but 
in Chald. j20 signifies fo designate, 
mark, appoint ; Y2D, a mark, sign. Comp. 
yo. It thus corresponds to 7H ; and 
the meaning thus elicited suits the 
connexion better than the interpre- 
tation of the LXX., Aq., Theod., 
and Vulg., according to which, but 
without other authority, the word 
signifies mil/e¢t. Our translators have 
rightly given the signification, but 
improperly connect it with Mm, from 
which it differs in gender. 903, spelt, 
a kind of corn, so called from the shorn 
or smooth appearance of its ears ; root 
0D3, ¢o cut or poll the hair; LUXX., Aq., 
Theod., Symm., ζέα and ὄλυρα. The 
suffix } in in?a3 has for its antecedent 
wing, the husbandman; thus corre- 
sponding to ΠΝ, ver. 24. The mean- 
ing 1s, iz the border of his field. Hitzig, 
less properly, refers the suffix to 720). 
26. As Yo>8 is the nomin. to both 
verbs, I have, in accordance with the 
genius of our language, placed it be- 
fore the former, and employed the 
pronoun before the latter. In Hebrew 
poetry the pronoun frequently occurs 
first. The inference to be deduced 
from the declaration here made, is 
not expressed, but left to be drawn 
by those who are addressed: If God 
thus instructs the husbandman to 
vary and adapt his processes accord- 
ing to the exigency of circumstances, 
much more may it be expected that 
He himself will act with due dis- 


_ crimination. 


252 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XXIX. 


27 For the dill is not threshed with the threshing-sledge ; 
Nor is the wheel of the wain rolled over the cummin ; 
But the dill is beaten out with a staff, 


And the cummin with a flail. 


28 Bread-corn must be bruised ; 


For he will not always be threshing it ; 
Nor drive the wheel of his waggon and his horses over it : 


He will not bruise it utterly. 
29 


This also proceedeth from Jehovah of Hosts, 


Whose plan is admirable, whose wisdom is great. 


27, 28. We have here a description 
of the different implements used in 
threshing. The yn, in full, yoy 9, 
chap. xli. 15, was a kind of sledge 
drawn by two oxen, in the front of 
which stood the driver on his knees, 
or sat on a piece of wood fixed cross- 
ways on the car. Under this machine 
were rollers of wood, with sharp 
stones, or pieces of iron, by which 
the straw was cut in pieces, and the 
grain separated from the ears. The 
m2” was also a car, but differed from 
the former by its having wheels in- 
stead of rollers, which, being serrated, 
produced the same effect, when drawn 
over the corn. Besides oxen, both 
horses and asses were employed in 
drawing these instruments; and, as 
appears from this passage, horses 
were made to perform the operation 
merely by treading out the grain, as 
they still do in different parts of the 
East. When the quantity was small, 
or when more minute kinds of seed 
were to be threshed out, a flail or 
switch was used, with which it was 
beat. See Judg. vi. 11; Ruth ii. 17. 
on), dread, is used for the corn or 
wheat of which it is made. Comp. 


the Arab. seb, cibus, edulium, triti- 


cum; Gr. oiros; and see chap. xxx. 
23. wie is the infinitive of an ob- 
solete verb, Ix, having the same sig- 
nification with «7, Some, however, 
consider it to be an infinitive form of 
ΟῚ itself; the δὶ being prefixed, after 
the manner of the Arabic, the analogy 
of which is preserved in }i78. See 
Gesenius. The Nun Epenthetic, ex- 
pressed by the latter Dagesh in 3:77, 
renders the word emphatic, and shews 
that it is placed in antithesis with 
piv, at the beginning of the verse. 
The practical idea conveyed is, that 
God mingles mercy with his judg- 
ments. His design is not to crush 
his people, but to render them fit 
for becoming useful subjects of his 
government; so that when these 
judgments have answered their end, 
they shall cease. 

29. Corresponds to ver. 26, but 
further contains the apodosis, vindi- 
cating to Jehovah transcendent skill 
and wisdom. His plans of operation 
are wonderfully adapted to the ends 
he has in view, and in all his pro- 
ceedings the infinite superiority of 
his understanding is displayed. 57 
and 327 are Hiphil intransitives. Ὁ 


---οο.- 


CHAPTER XXIX. 


The speedy enclosure of Jerusalem by the troops of Sennacherib, and the 
suddenness of their destruction, form the subject with which the prophet 
here commences, 1—8 ; the stupidity and hypocrisy of the Jews in that 


CHAP, XXIX. | 


ISAIAH. 


253 


and succeeding ages, and their corresponding punishment, are next 
described, 9—16 ; and the rest of the chapter is occupied with a prediction 
respecting the rejection of the Jews, and the vocation of the Gentiles: 
concluding with a promise of the final conversion of God's ancient people. 


1 Wo to Ariel, to Ariel, 


The city which David besieged ! 


Add ye year to year ; 
Let the festivals go round! 


1. That by 2x, Ariel, Jerusalem is 
meant, is agreed on all hands; but 
there is considerable difference of 
opinion in regard to the derivation 
and meaning of the name. Aq. and 
| Symm., λέων Θεοῦ ; which rendering 
has been adopted by Dathe, Déder- 
lein, Eichhorn, Gesenius, Maurer, and 
Scholz, who consider it as designed to 
denote the invincible character of the 
Jewish metropolis. In support of 
this interpretation an appeal is made 
to 2 Sam. xxiii. 20, where two heroes 
are called, 878 δ, ¢wo lions of God. 
Comp. Ezra viii. 16. And Gesenius 
adduces in illustration, g\I} yw), cle 


Lion of God, which Mohammed sur- 
named his uncle Hamzah; the name 


of Ali, the son of Ali Taleb, Awl 
NES al, the Victorious Lion of God ; 
and the Persic, |X} Broke of similar 


signification. But, as Jerusalem did 
not, on the occasion here referred to, 
sustain an actual siege, and thus give 
proof of her invincibility, and was 
afterwards destroyed by the Chalde- 
ans and Romans, such an appellation 
seems altogether inappropriate. 1, 
therefore, prefer the rendering of the 
Targ., according to which ‘x x has 
here the same signification as sy, 
Keri 99x, Ezek. xlii. 15, 16, viz. the 
hearth or fire-place, i.e. altar of God, 
on which the burnt sacrifices were 
offered. This interpretation is ap- 
proved by the Rabbins, Saad., Lapide, 
Sanctius, Grotius, Michaelis, Lowth, 
Rosenmiiller, Hensler, Jenour, and 
Hitzig. The reference will then be 


to Jerusalem as the centre of the 
Jewish polity, where alone it was 
lawful to sacrifice to Jehovah—a view 
which is corroborated by the mention 
made of the festivals in the latter 
part of the verse. For the signifi- 
cation of hearth, fire-place, attaching 


to “8, comp. the Arab, δ}, focus, ca- 

minus vel ignis, vel accensio ignis, ἧτο. 

from \, IL. ix foco seu camino ac- 
ay ἡ 


cendit ignem. Comp. also chap. xxxi. 
9. In 17727 ΠῚ is an ellipsis of Wx 
and Wy; and m7? is an instance of 
the construct state being formed with 
Wx understood, as Job xviii. 21, Dip 
ox YT ND. For the full form, see Lev. 
iv. 33; Jer. xxii. 12, Aq., however, 
renders 727 as a noun, πολίχνη παρεμ- 
βλήσεως Δαυίδ ; regarding ΠῚ as the 
usual construct. The LXX. and Vulg. 
take 737 in its strictly hostile sense, 
and are followed by most of the 
modern interpreters; whereas the 
Targ., Syr., and other versions, ex- 
hibit that of dwelling as in a resi- 
dence. The former seems fully borne 
out by the use of the same verb in 
ver. 3. Comp. 2 Sam. v. 6—8.—As 
7 signifies not only a: feast, but also 
a victim slain and offered on a festival 
occasion ; and ἨΒ2 signifies fo cut, cut 
of; our translators have supposed 
the reference to be to the slaying of 
sacrifices ; but as 422 nowhere occurs 
as a sacrificial term, and 75pm is used 
of the course or return of the seasons, 
year, &c. 1 Sam. i. 20; Exod. xxxiv. 
22; it is better to render, »»p7 027, 
let the festivals go round ; especially as 
the phrase is parallel with 720 ὃν 72. 
The language is that of irony; 


1 ἢ 


254 


2 Yet I will distress Ariel, 


ISAIAH. 


(CHAP. XXIX. 


And there shall be mourning and sorrow ; 
And it shall indeed be an Ariel to me. 

3 I will even encamp against thee round about ; 
And I will beset thee with posts, 


And raise forts against thee. 


4 Depressed, from the ground thou shalt speak, 
And from the dust shall thy speech be low; 


strongly intimating that the cere- 
monial observances in which the Jews 
engaged would not avert the Divine 
judgments, while their hearts were 
not right with God. 

2. 727 is here used in the sense 
of struitening or distressing by siege. 
m4) TNA form a paronomasia. Comp. 
Lam. 11. 5. The 3 in δ ΝΘ is the haph 
veritatis, or intensive : Jerusalem shall 
indeed be a place of sacrifice to me ; 
for there I will slay the numerous 
army of the king of Assyria. The 
verse, therefore, contains a promise of 
deliverance, as well as threatenings 
of punishment; though the former 
is indefinitely expressed, leaving it 
to be clearly inferred from ver. 5. 

3, 4. We have in these verses a 
description of the surrounding army 
of Sennacherib ; the preparations to 
be made by the troops for an attack 
on the city; and the dejection and 
dismay with which the inhabitants 
should be seized on perceiving them. 
What the Assyrians did, Jehovah 
vindicates to himself, as they were 
only the instruments which he em- 
ployed in punishing the Jews. Though 
the history makes no mention of the 
construction of any military appa- 
ratus for attacking Jerusalem, yet, 
as it is expressly stated that “the 
king of Assyria sent Tartan, and Rab- 
saris, and Rabshakeh, from Lachish, 
to king Hezekiah, with a great host, 
732 73, against Jerusalem,” 2 Kings 
xvill. 17; Isa. xxxvi. 2; there cannot 
be a doubt, that they occupied them- 
selves with hostile demonstrations 
while the negotiations were going 
forward. There is, therefore, no ne- 
cessity to depart from the threatened 
attack of Sennacherib, and apply the 
prophecy to the sieges effected by 


Nebuchadnezzar and Titus, especially 
as no intimation whatever is given of 
the taking of the city, and its con- 
sequences ; and, as the sudden and 
complete destruction predicted vers. 
5—8, was experienced by the Assy- 
rians alone, chap. xxxvii. 36; and 
neither by the Chaldzans nor the 
Romans. The language of our Lord’s 
prophecy, Luke xix. 43, is parallel 
with that of Isaiah in the present 
instance : but this is no reason why 
both should be referred to the same 
event. The metaphors are military, 
and are descriptive of the measures 
adopted in a regular siege. 7, Arab. 


pe is properly the circle or line of | 


advance, first of all drawn round the | 
city to be blockaded, though here, 
with 3, the term is used adverbially. 
The reading 771, which Houbigant and 
Lowth approve, is found only in two 
MSS., and originally in two more ; 
but has otherwise no suffrage but 
that of the LXX., and is manifestly 
an ancient correction from ver. 1. 
22), from 323, ¢o place, station, denotes 
the advanced joss, or columns of 
pioneers ; and the nz were breast- 
works, palisades, and other means of 
defence, erected by the besieging 
party for their protection, and from 
behind which they annoyed the city. 
For nz, six of Kennicott and De 
Rossi’s MSS. read niz9; three more 
have done so originally, and perhaps 
two more; but the former is the 
more appropriate word, in reference 
to a besieging army. ‘Mz is from Vy, 
to press, straiten, beset hostilely. For 
2ix and ADS, see on chap. vill. 19. 
Such should be the utter dejection of 
the inhabitants, that they would be 
able to give expression to their fears 


CHAP. ΧΧΙΧ.] 


ISATAH. 


259 


Thy voice shall even be as that of a spirit from the ground ; 
And thy speech shall mutter from the dust. 

5 But the multitude of thine enemies shall be as fine dust, 
And the multitude of the terrible as the flitting chaff ; 
It shall also take place suddenly, in a moment. 

6 By Jehovah of Hosts himself thou shalt be visited, 
With thunder and earthquake, and a loud voice ; 


With storm and tempest, 
And flames of devouring fire. 


7 And as a dream, or a vision of the night, 
Shall be the multitude of all the nations, 


That fight against Ariel ; 


Even all who fight against her and her ramparts ; 


» And those who distress her. 


8 It shall even be as when a hungry man dreameth, and behold! 


he eateth ; 


only in feeble and scarcely articulate 
sounds, resembling those produced 
by the necromancer or ventriloquist, 
when personating with his voice the 
spirit which he pretended to have 
evoked. Comp. 2 Kings xix. 1—6 ; 
Isa. xxxvii. 1—6; and see Lowth’s 
note. 

5. Lowth’s change of 7%, thine ene- 
mies, into DN, the proud, is altogether 
unwarranted. “is often used in the 
sense of 12, an enemy. The LXX., to 
whom he appeals, render it elsewhere, 
as here, by ἀσεβὴς, and by ἐχθρὸς ; 
foreigners being regarded in this light 
by the Hebrews. ]127, a8 occurring 
here and ver. 7, denotes the multitude 
of warriors composing the 72) >, 
referred to in the preceding note. 
They are compared to the finest dust, 
not to point out their number, but to 
express the ease with which they 
should be removed from their position. 
This is further intimated in the fol- 
lowing member of the parallelism, by 
their being compared to the light 
chaff driven away by the wind. np} 
Dxn, which occurs in the inverse 
order, Y02) ONNS, chap. xxx. 13, is de- 
signed emphatically to mark the 
suddenness with which the Assyrians 
should be destroyed. 

6. The nomin. to WA is the Assy- 


rian foe, understood. ove, lit. from 
with, conveys the idea of immediate 
or miraculous interposition. See chap. 
vii. 11, viii. 18. No positive inference 
can be drawn from this verse respect- 
ing the nature of the phenomena 
connected with the destruction of the 
army of Sennacherib—the language 
being obviously charged with the 
sublime imagery of prophetic poetry. 
Comp. Ps. xi. 6; Isa. xxiv. 1, 18, 19, 
20, xxx. 30, xxxiv. 8—10; and Lowth’s 
ixth Lect. on Heb. Poetry. 

7, 8. 08372, ὅσο. comprehend all 
out of the different nations subject to 
the king of Assyria, who composed the 
besieging army. ΠΡῸΣ πεῖ", The 
suffix forms the accusative, as in 737, 
Ps. li. 6. The point of comparison 
lies in the entire disappearance of the 
phantasmata of a night vision. Thus 
completely should every enemy dis- 
appear before the morning. 

8. The comparison is here amplified 
by the prophet, in a manner which 
Lowth justly characterises as elegant 
and beautiful in the highest degree, 
well wrought up, and perfectly suited 
to the end proposed. Nothing could 
have more aptly described the eager- 
ness of the Assyrians to attack Jeru- 
salem, and the complete disappoint- 
ment of Sennacherib. The use of 


250 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XXIX. 


But he waketh, and his soul is empty! 

Or, as when a thirsty man dreameth, and behold! he drinketh ; 
But he waketh, and behold! he is faint, and his soul craveth! 
Thus shall it be with the multitude of all the nations, 

That fight against Mount Zion. 


9 Delay, and wonder ; 


Take your pleasure, and be blinded. 
They are drunk, but not with wine ; 
They stagger, but not with strong drink. 
10 For Jehovah hath poured upon you a spirit of stupor, 


the same imagery in part by Virgil, 
En. xii. 908, and Lucret. iv. 1091, is 
shewn by Lowth; but there is a pecu- 
liar terseness and simplicity in the 
language of the prophet, and the 
triple repetition of the idiomatic 737, 
behold! greatly increases the effect. 
The corresponding 7x3 and 72 mark 
the protasis and apodosis. 

9. Isaiah now turns directly to the 
unbelieving Jews, and reproves them 
for their stupidity and false security. 
The language is that of irony, to ex- 
press which the more strongly the 
verbs are put in the concessive and 
declaratory Imperative. In all proba- 
bility the prophet was induced thus 
to complain of his countrymen by the 
vacant stare and obstinacy discover- 
able in the countenances of those 
whom he had just addressed. As the 
nation enjoyed profound peace, they 
could give no credit to the predictions 
of war; and therefore delayed repent- 
ance, and indulged the more in sin. 
wmarany, Imp. of mp tn7, the Hithpael 
of 779, to which it must be referred, 
though the verb is not used in Kal. 
The derivation from 2m, which some 
propose, cannot be sustained; the 
Imper. in Hithpael of which being 


wmany, Hab, i.5. Comp the Arab. &e, 


Leo; abstine, desine, and kK 4.0» abstinuit, 


destitit, which is employed in reference 
to the stopping or delaying of camels, 
horses, &c. Our idiomatic sfd//-I- 
shall-I corresponds entirely to the 
Hebrew, both in form and meaning, 
but is not sufficiently dignified to be 
adopted into the version, YYw, the 


other verb employed, having two 
different significations, according as it 
occurs in the simple or the redupli- 
cated conjugations, both are here 
adopted with admirable effect. For 
the signification of Kal and Hiphil, 
see chap. vi. 10. In Pilp. and Hithpalp. 
it has that of delight ; to cause delight ; 
delight, indulge oneself in pleasure, &c. 
See Ps. xciv. 19, cxix. 16, 47, 70; Isa. 
xi. 8. For the peculiar use of the 
Imperatives, see chap. viii. 9—Having 
directly addressed his auditors, the 
prophet proceeds, by the use of the 
third person of the preterite, to point 
them out to others, and describes 
their spiritual stupor by comparing 
them to persons in a state of intoxica- 
tion. The more, however, to mark the 
character of this stupor, he adds, dut 
not with wine, &c. Comp. chap. li. 21, 
where the phrase is used in a different 
sense; and Aschylus, Eumen. 863, 
ἀοίνοις ἐμμανεῖς θυμώμασι. 

10. This stupefaction is ascribed to 
the judicial will of God. In punish- 
ment of their resistance of his truth, 
he so ordered it in his providence, 
that the Jews should become the sub- 
jects of spiritual blindness and insen- 
sibility. See on chap. vi. 10. ™ 93, 
a less frequent form for 1 72v. Both 
verbs convey the ideas of descent 
from a higher source, and the copious- 
ness of the supply. The signification 
of mingling, mixing, given in the Vulg., 
and that of causing to drink, exhibited 
in the LXX., are inappropriate, being 
at variance with the wsus Jloquendt. 


mom, from on, Arab. oy occlusit 


portam vel hiatum; fotum occupavtt ; 


CHAP. ΧΧΙΧ.] 


ISAIAH. 


257 


And bound up your eyes, the prophets ; 
And your heads, the seers, hath he covered. 


11 
book, 


And the whole vision is become to you like the words of a sealed 


Which is delivered to one acquainted with letters, 
Saying, Read this, I pray thee ; 
But he saith, I cannot, for it is sealed. 

12 Or, the book is delivered to one unacquainted with letters, 
Saying, Read this, I pray thee ; 


But he saith, I am unacquainted with letters. 


13 Wherefore Jehovah saith, 


Since this people draw near to me with their mouth, 


to throw into a profound sleep or stupor, 
signifies a state of complete insensi- 
bility, in which the senses are locked 
up, and the functions proper to the 
nervous system almost entirely sus- 
pended. The term is here used figu- 
ratively of the suspension of the use 
of reason, judgment, &c. oxy, in Kal 
and Piel, signifies to bind fast, make 
firm; to bind up, shut completely, as the 
eyes; Chal. DzY, clwusit; comp. Ddx, 


ont; Arab. » prohibuit, servavit, 


defendit ; IV. vineulo loroque constrinzit. 
The words ΘΟ Στ ny, and O77, Koppe, 
Eichhorn, Gesenius, Hitzig, and Mau- 
rer, reject as a gloss; and Hahn, in 
his 12mo ed. of the Heb. Bib., marks 
them as doubtful. Zwinglius con- 
siders them to be an epexegesis. If 
genuine, they should be differently 
pointed, and rendered as in the version. 
According to the present division, nx 
Dwi3y, should be 02:7 ny}, which is 
the reading of ftzventy-three MSS. ; has 
been originally in sz more, and pro- 
bably in ¢wo or three besides; and is 
found in the three earliest editions. 
The LXX. and Syr. also express the 
Vau. Not only should the Jewish 
people be blinded, but their teachers 
and rulers, to whom they naturally 
looked for guidance, should also labour 
under gross mental obscurity. Comp. 
Mait. xv. 14. 

11, 12. 7 nT, lit. the vision of the 
whole, i.e. all that God has revealed by 
his servants the prophets—the doc- 
trines, predictions, promises, threaten- 


ings, &c. These verses teach the 
moral impossibility of those under- 
standing Divine revelation whose 
minds are under the dominion of sin. 
There was nothing naturally impos- 
sible in the cases referred to: the 
person who was skilled in letters had 
only to break open the seal, and he 
who was ignorant would only have to 
learn them; by the application of 
these means, a knowledge of the 
document would have been acquired. 
The point of comparison lies in the 
disinclination or aversion of the mind. 
Comp. Dan. xii. 10 ; 2 Cor. iii. 14, 15,16; 
John vii. 17. In 190", the article is pro- 
perly omitted by the authors of the Keri. 

13. Instead of "ΣΝ, very many of 
Kennicott and De Rossi’s MSS. read 
mm. It is also found in the four 
oldest printed editions. }~ and 15}, 
ver. 14, are correlatives. According 
to the Targ., which is supported by 
the reading of seventeen MSS. and ¢en 
printed editions, 32 is to be pointed 
23, and rendered, “This people are 
compelled,” i.e. they worship me in- 
voluntarily ; but the common point- 
ing and construction are preferable. 
Supply ὯΝ, and comp. Exod. xxx. 20 ; 
Jer. xxx. 21. For the form ‘nx onxy, 
comp. ink ΠΡ, 2 Sam. iii, 11. The 
verbal noun is used for the Infinitive. 
Comp. chap. viii. 5. By their fear of 
God is not meant true piety, but, as we 
should say, their religion ; nor by “the 
precepts of men” which they had 
been taught are we to understand, as 
Gesenius and some others insinuate, 


258 


ISAIAH. 


And honour me with their lips, 
But have far removed their heart from me, 


And their fear of me is taught 
14 
Wonderfully and wondrously ; 
Yea, the wisdom of their wise 


by the precept of men: 


Therefore [ will proceed to deal wonderfully with this people, 


shall perish, 


And the prudence of their prudent shall be hid. 


15 


Wo to them that deeply hide their purpose from Jehovah, 


Whose deeds are in the dark, and that say, 


Who seeth us? and, Who kno 


16 O your perverseness ! 


the ritual precepts of the Mosaic law ; 
but purely human doctrines, injunc- 
tions, and rites, which their authors 
and inventors imposed under the 
pretext of Divine authority. That 
such existed in the days of Isaiah, 
there can be no doubt ; and as, from 
the very nature of the case, they 
must have accumulated from age 
to age, till they were swelled to 
the awful amount which they had 
reached in the time of our Lord, the 
language is strikingly descriptive of 
the character of the great body of 
the nation during the whole of that 
period. On this principle we are 
warranted in interpreting literally the 
words of Christ, προεφήτευσε περὶ 
ὑμῶν Ἡσαΐας. Matt. xv. 7,8; Mark 
vii. 6, 7. While the prophet rebuked 
his contemporaries, his inspired decla- 
rations, recorded in the sacred volume, 
served as a standing rebuke of the 
evil, and bore preeminently on its 
fullest development in the religion of 
the Scribes and Pharisees. The dis- 
crepancies existing between the Heb. 
text, and the Greek of the LXX. and 
the N. T. are trifling, and do not in 
the least affect the sense of the 
passage. Mistaking 7m) for wm), the 
LXX. have translated it μάτην δὲ. 
mya and m2, though singular, have 
been taken as collectives, and so ren- 
dered ἐντάλματα and Sidageuhees 

14, APY is a defective punctuation 
of the participle PY. See chap. xxxviii. 

5, and note on chap. xxviii. 16. °?57, 
ἐπ and 28, furnish a marked in- 
stance of the varied repetition of a 
word for the sake of energy and effect. 


weth us ? 


See on chap. xxii. 17. The verse con- 
tains a special prediction of the awful 
judgment that God would inflict upon 
the nation by means of the infatuation 
of their teachers, which the apostle 
shews to have received its fulfilment 
in his day, 1 Cor.i.19. So blinded 
were they, and so completely did they 
blind the people, that by their re- 
jection of the true Messiah, and their 
instigating opposition to the Roman 
government, they brought about the 
destruction of Jerusalem, and the 
final dispersion of the nation. Most 
commentators, indeed, find only an 
accommodation of the prophecy in 
this quotation; but its position, in 
the present connexion, between the 
description of the Jewish religion- 
ists in the days of our Lord, ver. 
13, and a prediction of the rejection 
of the Jews, and the calling of the 
Gentiles, ver. 17, proves that Isaiah 
and Paul had the same persons in view. 
The silly and puerile character of Jew- 
ish or Rabbinical learning, during a 
period of eighteen centuries, affords a 
convincing, though melancholy proof of 
the Divine inspiration of the prophet. 

15. An exact portraiture of the dis- 
guise and hypocrisy of the Pharisees 
in the time of our Lord. See Matt. 
xxiii, 13—33. pry is used adver- 
bially, as in chap. vii. 11; Jer. xlix. 8, 
30. The Ὁ in 7 is strictly pre- 
positional, and not comparative, as 
Lowth renders it. 

16. 02257. Gcolampadius, perversitas 
vestra ; Zwinglius, vestra presumptro. 
O the satan of your depraved and per- 
verse disposition! What madness to 


[CHAP. XXIX. 


-ς 


CHAP. XXIX.] 


ISAIAH. 


259 


Shall the potter be regarded as the clay ? 
Shall the thing made say of its maker, He made me not ? 
Or the thing formed say of its former, He is unskilful ? 


17 


Is it not yet a very little while, 


And Lebanon shall be converted into a fruitful field, 
And the fruitful field be deemed a forest ? 


18 


For in that day shall the deaf hear the words of the book, 


And, freed from obscurity and darkness, the eyes of the blind 


shall see. 


imagine that you can divest yourselves 
of responsibility to your Maker! The 
points of similitude are the absolute 
nothingness of the creature, and the 
infinite skill and sovereignty of the 
Creator. Paul employs the same 
similitude, Rom. ix. 20, but for a 
different purpose. Comp. Isa, xly. 9. 
The word is the Kal Infin. used as 
a noun. Comp. 777, Ps. li. 6. δὲ is 
simply interrogative ; and its force is 
carried forward so as to modify the 
following 3, Js it so that, &c. ? or, asin 
the translation, Shall the thing made, 
&c.? Nothing could equal in absur- 
dity, or in the perversion of every 
principle of sound reason, the conduct 
of the impenitent and unbelieving 
Jews. Instead of p20, the LXX., Syr., 
Targ., Vulg., and one of De Rossi’s 
MSS. originally read pin; but the 
reading of the Textus Receptus is 
preferable. Some would refer the 
passage to the subversion of the 
Jewish state ; but with less propriety, 
though the conduct here described 
was the cause of that subversion. 

17. Because 7122) and 23 are here 
contrasted, the LXX., Targ., Syr., 
Vulg., Cyril, Zwinglius, Forerius, 
Brentius, Osiander, Piscator, Schmid., 
Lowth, Dathe, De Wette, Boothroyd, 
Jenour, and others, render the latter 
by Carmel, as if the mountain of that 
name were meant. On comparing 
this passage, however, with chap. xxxii. 
15, it seems much more appropriate 
to take it as an appellative in 
the sense of garden or fruitful field. 
Thus Kimchi, Luther, Gicolampadius, 
Leo Juda, Michaelis, Rosenmiiller, 
Gesenius, Hitzig, Scholz, Noyes, &c. 
The points of comparison are not the 
barrenness of Lebanon, taken as a 


whole, and the fertility of a plain or 
open country ; for a great proportion 
of that mountain is exceedingly fertile, 
abounding in rich valleys, extensive 
and well-cultivated fields, productive 
gardens, &c.; but the forest-district, 
abounding in cedars, pines, cypresses, 
and other species of trees. This is 
evident from the antithesis in the 
last clause of the verse, in which ™, 
a forest, corresponds to Lebanon in the 
former member of the parallelism. 
The language is figurative, expressing 
the great revolution to take place at 
the appearance of the Messiah. The 
Gentile world, which had produced 
no fruits of righteousness, but re- 
sembled the wild and uncultivated 
regions of Lebanon, should abound in 
moral fertility and beauty ; while the 
Jewish church, which had formerly 
been celebrated as the garden of the 
Lord, should be reduced to a state of 
nature, and become like a rudely 
scattered forest. Comp. chap. xxxii. 
15, lv. 13 ; and specially for the sub- 
ject, Matt. xxi. 43 ; Rom. xi. 17—22. 
18. 18D corresponds to mun, ver. 11. 
The Ὁ in 78M kD denotes separa- 
tion, not locality, “freed from obscu- 
rity,” &c., i.e. no longer in such a state. 
Most of the commentators are of opi- 
nion, that the Jews described ver. 10, 
are here referred to; but the imme- 
diate context requires the words to be 
applied to the Gentiles, who had not 
been favoured with the light of reve- 
lation; to whom the sacred Scriptures 
should be delivered in their respective 
languages ; and who, by the preaching 
of the gospel, should be turned from 
darkness to light, and from the power 
of Satan unto God. See chap. xxxii, 
3, xxxv. 5, xlii. 7, 16; Eph. iv. 17, 18. 


200 


19 


ISAIAH, 


(CHAP. XXIX. 


The aftlicted also shall exceedingly rejoice in Jehovah ; 


And the poor among men shall exult in the Holy One of Israel. 


20 
The scoffer also is consumed ; 


For the tyrannical is come to nothing ; 


And all that watched for iniquity are cut off : 


21 


That condemned a man in his cause, 


And laid snares for him that decided in the gate, 
And turned aside the righteous without ground. 


22 
He that redeemed Abraham ; 


Nevertheless, thus saith Jehovah to the house of Jacob, 


Jacob shall not now be ashamed, 
Nor shall his face now grow pale. 


19. Comp. chap. lv. 12; Matt. v. 3, 
xi. 5; James ii. 5. These words apply 
principally to the Gentiles, though 
they also include such of the natural 
seed of Abraham as should submit 
themselves to the righteousness of 
God. 

20, 21, contain a prediction of the 
removal of those rulers and judges 
who oppressed the people of God; 
made a mock of true religion; and 
exercised every species of falsehood 
and injustice. Such, in a high degree, 
were the Pharisees and Sadducees 
towards the close of the Jewish polity ; 
and on them signally was executed 
the judgment here threatened. Ἢ 
78, an unusual phrase, happily chosen 
for the purpose of marking the atro- 
cious character of those who ought 
sedulously to have watched over the 
best interests of the people, but were 
awake only for evil. It applies speci- 
ally to the members of the Sanhedrim. 
721 is used in a forensic sense, as in 
Exod. xviii. 16; and ΘΠ is equiva- 
lent to Ywy. Some interpret the 
words of seductive conversation ; and 
others, in conformity with the ren- 
dering of our common version, of 
condemning a person for a merely 
verbal fault; but the judicial sense is 
supported by what follows. ‘wa m2 
is descriptive of ὦ judge—the gate or 
forum being the place where the in- 
habitants of eastern cities met for 
business, conversation, &c., and where 
trials were held. Comp. Amos ν. 10; 


Deut. xxii. 15, xxv. 7; Job v. 4; Prov. 
xxii. 22. pip is from wip, of the same 
signification with wp, fo lay snares. 
win2, comp. wn ὅν, chap. lix. 4, where 
it is synonymous with x, vanity, 


falsehood, wickedness ; Arab. Li, 80007.8, 


negligens fuit ; SF » vacuus ; cig, se 
ws, vane res 
et futiles; LUXX. ἐπ’ ἀδίκοις ; Targ. 
pwr, in falsitate. It is here equivalent 
to D7, without cause, undeservedly. 

22. There is a perceptible pause at 
the close of the preceding verse; and 
the prophet is here charged to assure 
the truly pious, who alone were pro- 
perly entitled to the appellation of 
“the house of Jacob,”—being the 
spiritual children of Abraham,—that 
the immediately impending calamity 
should be averted. The repetition of 
MY δ, vot now, is emphatic. Michaelis 
needlessly stumbles at the phrase, 
DMN ΠΝ 77, since this verb signifies 
to preserve, as well as to redeem, and is 
quite as applicable to Abraham as to 
Jacob, Gen. xlviii. 16. 7), a ἅπαξ dey. 
obviously signifying to be white, pallid, 

vy 


Chal. 17, Syr. 3Qae, Arab. 


applicuit ad res vanas ; 


&c., from ὙΠ 


as 3) 
> to be or become white. Secker and 


Lowth suppose 15™ to have been the 
original reading, being more commonly 
used in connexion with wiz; the 
LXX., however, have μεταβαλεῖ ; the 


CHAP. XXX. | 


ISAIAH. 


261 


23 But when his children see the work of my hands in their midst, 


They shall hallow my name ; 


Yea, they shall hallow the Holy One of Jacob, 
And reverence the God of Israel. 

24 Those also who erred in spirit shall know understanding ; 
And those who were obstinate shall learn doctrine. 


Targ. pam, and this Kimchi and Abul- 
walid approve. 

23. °2, for Ox 2, But when, ἕο. The 
ἡ in ink refers to "P TwYD, and is 
anticipative of it, as in the Aramaic. 
vi? are the children of Jacob, the Jews, 
and the nomin. to inX)3, 42973, iz the 
midst of them, i.e. in the church, wor- 
shipping the God of their fathers. 
The work of God’s hands is the καινὴ 
κτίσις, or New Testament church, 
consisting for the most part of con- 
verted Gentiles. It is here predicted 
that the time would come when the 


sight of so many worshippers of the 
true God, from among those who had 
formerly been ignorant of him, should 
excite the natural posterity of Abra- 
ham to give glory to his name. Comp. 
Rom. xi. 11. 

24. The Myr and O22 are the 
blinded and refractory Jews, who had 
so long refused to acknowledge the 
Messiah, but who should at length 
embrace the doctrines of his gospel. 


For 21, comp. the Arab. wry substitit, 


constitit, commoratus furt. 


CHAPTER XXX. 


This chapter is likewise connected with the invasion of Sennacherib, and was 
evidently occasioned by attempts that were made to form an alliance with 
Egypt in order to obtain the aid of that power against the Assyrians. Vers. 
1—7 contain a description of these attempts, and their failure; which is 
followed by a severe reproof of those who had originated them, with a 
denunciation of the Babylonish captivity as the punishment of apostacy 
from God, 8—17. The prophet then addresses himself to those who put 
their confidence in Jehovah, and assures them of the restoration of the 
Divine favour, 18—26; and concludes with a prediction of the overthrow of 
the Assyrian army, couched in imagery of the boldest and most striking 


character, 27—33. 


1 Wo to the rebellious children, saith Jehovah, 
Who execute a purpose, but not from me ; 


1. Several commentators think re- 
ference is here made to the conspiracy 
of Hosea, king of Samaria, and the 
embassy which he sent to So, king of 


Egypt, 2 Kings xvii. 4 ; but it is more 
probable that Isaiah has in view the 
unbelieving portion of the Jews, resi- 
dent partly in Jerusalem, and partly 


K K 


262 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XXX. 


And pour out a libation, but not from my Spirit :— 


Adding sin to sin. 


2 Who set out to go down to Egypt, 


But inquire not at my mouth ; 


Fleeing to the protection of Pharaoh, 
And taking refuge in the shadow of Egypt. 


co 


But the protection of Pharaoh shall become your shame, 


And your refuge in the shadow of Egypt, your confusion. 


4 For their princes are at Zoan, 


And their ambassadors have reached Hanes. 


or 


They are each ashamed of a people that cannot profit them, 


That are neither for help nor profit, 


in the country, who, unknown to the 
pious king Hezekiah, and in direct 
violation of the command of God, had 
undertaken to procure assistance from 
Egypt. That such application was 
known to Sennacherib is evident from 
the words of Rabshakeh, chap. xxxvi. 
6,9. nivy), is expletive of oD, the 2 
before the Infinitives being used to 
introduce the actions by which the 
rebellious disposition was manifested. 
See 1 Sam. xiv. 33; Ps. citi. 20. my πῶν 
means not fo form, but to execute a 
purpose. As this was to be done in 
Egypt, the prophet scruples not to in- 
troduce the party as pouring out a 
libation—a pagan custom employed 
on the conclusion of a treaty of alli- 
ance between two nations ; hence the 
name σπονδὴ given to such a league 
by the Greeks. As 902 signifies both 
to pour out, and to weave, hedge in, pro- 
tect, some prefer the latter idea, which 
is that adopted in our common version; 
but the former is more appropriate, 
and is that expressed in the LXX., 


> 2 
ἐποιήσατε συνθήκας, and the Syr., 
mm ox ay 


f2c01 Qs03. Before ὙΠῸ supply 7, 
from the preceding. By 1, is here 
meant, as frequently, the Spirit of 
God speaking through his servants the 
prophets. The refractory Jews had 
not consulted these infallible interpre- 
ters of the Divine will. This is fur- 
ther explained in the following verse. 
Comp. for M7» xt, Josh. ix. 14. Be- 
fore mentioning the embassy that had 
been sent to Egypt, the prophet, in 


this verse, anticipates its fruitless 
result, and directs his address point- 
edly to those who had sent it. In 
such prolepsis, of which several ex- 
amples occur in Scripture, there is 
much force. 

4, For yw, Tanis, see chap. xix. 11. 
As 037, instead of 037, is found in six 
MSS., and has probably been in a 
number more, and is the reading ex- 
pressed in the LXX. and Syr., some 
have supposed that the passage should 
be rendered, “have reached it,” 7. 6. 
Tanis, “¢o xo purpose ;°’ but the paral- 
lelism absolutely requires the name of 
a place, which the Targ. supplies, ren- 
dering the word omETA, Zahpanhes, or 
Daphne. This interpretation Cham- 
pollion is inclined to adopt, regarding 
Das merely an abbreviation; but the 
place meant is in all probability Hines, 


or FP nes, cNEC, ες ΗΟ, Ube, 


of Edrisi, Heracleopolis, a large city of 
Middle Egypt, and the capital of the 
Heracleopolitan Nome. Gesenius and 
Winer accede to the opinion of Vi- 
tringa, that it is the city of ”Avvots, 
mentioned by Herodotus, ii. 137. The 
suffix Ὁ refers to the rebellious party, 
understood. 

5. wei, according to the points, 
should be w21n, without 8, which is the 
reading of eleven of Kennicott and 
De Rossi's MSS.; has been in five 
more originally ; two have it in the 
margin ; and several note the δὶ as re- 
dundant. The preposition ° marks 
the foundation of the disappointment ; 


CHAP. ΧΧΧ.] 


ἸΞΑΙΔΗ. 


263 


But for a shame and also a reproach. 
6 THE SENTENCE OF THE BEASTS OF THE SOUTH. 
Through a land of distress and difficulty, 
Whence come the lioness and the fierce lion, 
The viper and the fiery flying serpent, 
On the shoulders of young asses they carry their wealth, 
And their treasures on the bunches of camels, 
To a people that shall not profit them. 
7 For vapour and emptiness shall be the help of Egypt. 


or, aS we should say, its source. 33 
has, in such connexion, all the force of 
ΝΞ The latter, by emendation, is 
the reading of four of Kennicott’s 
MSS. 

6, 7. That 222 nioma kw forms the 
inscription to what immediately fol- 
lows in these two verses, seems incon- 
trovertible ; but that they were inser- 
ted by a later hand, as Gesenius and 
Hitzig assert, is highly improbable. 
As the prophet was commanded, ver. 
8, both to write the oracle on a tablet, 
and inscribe it in a book, it is obvious 
that the former, being for public ex- 
hibition, must have had an inscription 
prefixed to it at the time, than which 
none could have been more appropriate 
than that here given. The “ beasts of 
the south” are not those mentioned 
immediately after, which are merely 
introduced for the purpose of describ- 
ing the desert, but the “ young asses ” 
and “camels,” on which the present 
or subsidy was conveyed to Egypt. 
133, south, may either mark their des- 
tination, or the desert to the south of 
Palestine, through which they passed 
on their way thither. The former 
seems the more appropriate. Geniti- 
vus hic est objecti, sive cause _finalis. 
Rosenm. Of the existence of the lion 
in the deserts of Arabia, see Diod. Sic. 
11. 20; Hasselquist’s Travels, p. 563. 
ὉΠ is an enallage of number, instead 
of 7292; just as D7, in the 7th ver., 
stands for '7; LXX., ἐκεῖθεν. For the 
description of the desert, comp. Deut. 
1.19, viii. 15; and for FpIva Mw, the 
note on chap. xiv. 29. yay, Arab. 


cl, vipera; from gla, iratus, spu- 


mans; UXX. ἀσπίδες. For ony, a 


number of MSS., and several printed 
editions, support the Keri ΘΝ ; and 
twenty-eight MSS., and seven others 
corrected, together with an ancient 
printed Bible, read o7>n, instead of 
oro; LXX. τὸν πλοῦτον. For this 
use of 07, as the suffix, instead of 
Ὁ after a singular noun, see Ezek. 
vii. 11. mw23 occurs only in this 
place, and is of uncertain derivation. 


The most probable is the Arab. Utes 


supellex domestica vilior ; 1t being, as it 
were, the furniture of the camel. That 
the hunch, or hump, of that animal is 
meant, there can be no doubt. It is 
of the shape of a pyramid, and some- 
times of such a size as to occupy at 
its base nearly the entire back of the 
animal. The words ni ἘΠ ΠῚ have 
greatly perplexed interpreters. Those 
who approve of our common render- 
ing, Their strength is to sit still, consider 
them as designed to teach that the 
true strength and security of the 
Jews consisted in the exercise of quiet 
and patient confidence in God, assured 
that he would deliver them in his own 
way. To justify such rendering, how- 
ever, the first two words must be joined, 
D771, and comp. above in O77. But 
against this construction of the pas- 
sage there lie two objections. First, 
the pronominal suffix could not with 
propriety be referred to any antece- 
dent, but O79, at the beginning of 
the verse. Secondly, the noun 3 
never oecurs with the acceptation, 
strength, but always signifies pride, in- 


solence, rage, from 34, Syr. a5, 


tumultuatus est, to rage, act proudly, or 
insolently. 3, Ps. xc. 10, means pride 


264 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XXX. 


Therefore I have called her, RAHAB THE INACTIVE. 
8 Now come, write it on a tablet before them, 


And inscribe it in a book; 


That it may be for future days, 


A testimony for ever. 


9 For they are a rebellious people; lying children; 
Children that will not hear the law of Jehovah. 


10 


Who say to the seers, See not; 


And to those who have visions, Give us not right visions ; 


Speak smooth things to us; 
Give us delusive visions. 
Turn aside from the way ; 
Decline from the path ; 


11 


Cause to cease from our presence the Holy One of Israel. 


12 


Wherefore thus saith the Holy One of Israel: 


Since ye have rejected this word, 
And trusted in oppression and perverseness ; 
And staid yourselves upon them : 


or doast, and not real strength. On the 
other hand, that it is here used as the 
poetical name of Egypt, seems most 
natural. Comp. Ps. lxxxvil. 4, [xxxix. 
10 (Hebr. 11); Isa. li.9. This name 
appears to have been given to her by 
the Hebrews, not in imitation of any 
native Egyptian word, but in reference 
to her insolent treatment of the people 
of God. The prophet shews that 
though, in her pride, she might blus- 
ter and boast of her prowess, and pro- 
mise to employ it in behalf of the 
Jews, she would nevertheless remain 
quietly at home, and leave them to 
their fate. “ Fando et promittendo, 
non agendo opemve ferendo.”’ Kocher. 
The rendering of Déoderlein, Rahab 
quiescens ; and that of Lowth, Rahab 
the Inactive; express the sense, and 
are approved in the main by more 
recent translators, though they disap- 
prove of the proposed alteration of 
ni OF into NawaT, ΓΞ ΘΠ, or such like. 
nt refers to Egypt as yx, ὦ country, 
and ἘΠ᾿ to the Egyptians, as its inha- 
bitants. 20 may either be the Kal 
Infin. of 2%, ¢o sit, sit still, remain in 
one’s place, or a segolate noun from 
nM, to rest, cease from labour, be inactive. 


Its abstract or indefinite form adds to 
the force of the idea. 

8. Gesenius, Hitzig, and Scholz, are 
of opinion that the same action is here 
commanded under different forms ; 
but Rosenmiiller and Maurer justly 
contend for two distinct acts—the in- 
scription of the sentence on a tablet, 
for public exhibition, and immediate 
use ; and its insertion in a book, for a 
perpetual testimony. O58, with them, 
in their presence, Jefore them. Comp. 
Gen. v. 24. For 192, for ever, read 7¥, 
jor a testimony. Thus the Targ., Syr., 
and Vulg.; and the LXX. in some 
MSS. Comp. Deut. xxxi. 19, 21, 26. 

9—11. 1x, they say, i.e. practically, 
or in effect. It is the wish of their 
hearts. 4732 and nin are contraries. 
The latter word is derived from 7 ; 


Arab. is, decepit, to act falsely, 


deceive. They delighted in falsehood, 
and wished to be freed from every 
restraint. Comp. 1 Kings xxii. 8; 
Iliad, i. 106. ὙΠ and Mk are the way 
or path of duty ; the course of life 
acceptable to God; true religion. 
Comp. chap. 11. 3, οὐ /req. 

12. 12, the Niph. Part. of ἢ", fo 


CHAP. XXX. ἢ 


ISATAH. 


265 


13 Therefore this iniquity shall be to you, 
Like a breach ready to fall, bulging out in a high wall, 
Whose smash cometh suddenly, in an instant. 


14 Its smash is like the smashing 


of a potter’s vessel, 


Which he breaketh in pieces, and spareth not ; 


Among whose fragments there 


is not found a sherd, 


With which to take up fire from the hearth, 


Or skim off water from a pool. 
ite 


For thus saith the Lord Jehovah, the Holy One of Israel: 


By conversion and by quietness ye shall be saved, 
In tranquillity and confidence shall be your strength ; 


But ye would not: 
16 
Therefore ye shall flee: 


But said, No! we will flee upon horses ; 


And, Upon swift coursers will we ride ; 
Therefore your pursuers shall be swift. 


ΤΠ 
At the menace of five shall ye 


ἐδ 


hend, turn aside. It is used substan- 
tively to denote perverseness, apostacy. 

13. “This iniquity,’ means the in- 
fidelity of the Jews developed in the 
language of the preceding verses, and 
their application to Egypt for aid. 
52) p28, a rupture in a wall, in conse- 
quence of which it is on the point of 
falling ; or, more properly, the piece 
forming one side of the breach or rent. 
As the Orientals most frequently 
constructed their walls of clay, or soft 
brick, dried in the sun, they are ex- 
tremely liable to rend, and be washed 
down by rain. Comp. Ps. lxi. 3. Hit- 
zig fails in his attempt to make ΥΞ 
signify atorrent. The following clause 
is inserted per epangrthosin, more fully 
to express the danger. 

14, ™2v, the Masoretes point as a 
verb, πλῷ, frangit eam; but the LXX. 
and Targ. more properly read 713%, ifs 
breach, as at the close of the preceding 
verse. nmin3 is the Infin. of descrip- 


tion. FT, Arab. dunt, demersus fuit; 
IV. invenit puteum ; to remove the sur- 
face, or upper part of any thing ; to 
draw water by skimming tt, 80 as not to 
take up any of the sand or mud at the 


A thousand at the menace of one, 


flee ; 


bottom. The meaning is, that, in 
punishment of their apostacy from 
God, the Jews should, as it respected 
their public affairs, experience a com- 
plete overthrow—a calamity which 
was inflicted when Jerusalem was de- 
stroyed by Nebuchadnezzar. 

15, 16. They had been called to re- 
nounce their false confidence, and 
make Jehovah the object of their 
trust, waiting quietly for his deliver- 
ing mercy, and finding their true 
strength in such exercise; but they 
refused to listen, were determined to 
pursue their own plan, and reaped the 
disastrous consequences. The riding 
upon horses refers to the Egyptian 
cavalry, which they expected would 
be sent for their deliverance, and not 
to ἱπποτυφία, of which Gesenius ex- 
plains it. Comp. chap. xxxi. 1; Jer. 
xlvi. 4. In Ὁ, 013, and pour, and %, 
DP, are elegant paronomasias. 

17. Gesenius thinks the conjecture 
of Lowth probable, according to which 
722) has been dropped out of the text; 
but whatever apparent force there may 
be in the supposition that the LXX. 
mistook that word for 021, and so 
rendered πολλοὶ, as also that there is 


266 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. “XXX. 


Till ye be left as a pole on the summit of a mountain 
δ ᾽ 


Or as a banner upon a hill. 


18 Nevertheless Jehovah will wait to show you favour, 
And he will arise to be merciful to you; 
For Jehovah is a God of justice: 
Blessed are all they that wait for him. 


Thou shalt not always weep ; 


Surely, the people of Zion shall dwell in Jerusalem ; 


He will surely show thee favour at the voice of thy ery ; 
When he heareth it, he will answer thee. 
20 ‘Though Jehovah give you the bread of distress, and the water 


of affliction, 


a designed imitation of Lev. xxvi. 8; 
Deut. xxx. 30; I agree with Hitzig 
and Scholz in the opinion that such a 
supplement would disturb the con- 
nexion of the words DAMNi7ON Ty DIN, 
and weaken, rather’ than strengthen 
the sense. “Quin tandem aliquando 
suze sibi vie certum Vatem ire si- 
nentes nostros errores corrigimus ?” 
Kocher. 

18. The last words of this verse 
shew that it is not a continuation of 
the threatening, but contains a pro- 
mise of mercy. ΒΟ is, therefore, to 
be taken in the strict sense of rec¢i- 
tude, and not in that of punishment. 
However severe might be the casti- 
gation to which the Jews should be 
subjected, it would not exceed the 
bounds of justice. God would not 
lay upon them more than was meet. 
om, Houbigant, Lowth, and others, 
alter into D)?, without sufficient autho- 
rity. Equally unauthorized is the 
attempt of Gesenius to elicit from 
Dm the meaning of remaining on high, 
not coming down to the help of his 
people ; though he has the example 
of Jarchi and Salomon ben Melech, 
who render it pm, he will keep himself 
at a distance. It is obviously parallel 
with 72”, a verb which is never used 
in the sense of forbearing to do any 
thing, but always in that of waiting 
for, desiring an opportunity, &e. The 
construction also of both verbs with 
the 5 of the Infinitives following, 
indicates inclination towards the per- 
formance of the actions which they 


express. The point of the sentiment 
lies in the peculiar use of 737; it 
being always elsewhere employed in 
reference to man and not to God. 
Instead of the Jews being permitted 
to wait for pity from Jehovah, he 
would, in great condescension, wait 
for them, that he might exercise that 
pity. 0 is here used in the simple 
acceptation of rising, as Ps. xxi. 14, 
and is thus equivalent to 097, which is 
frequently applied to the interposition 
of God in behalf of his people. 

From this verse to the 26th in- 
clusive, we have a full and particular 
prophecy relative to the blessings to 
be enjoyed by the Jews at the termi- 
nation of the captivity in Babylon. 

19. The LXX. improperly supply 
wip after Ov.—jr¥a2 OY stands for js OY ; 
only the 1 expresses more strongly 
the relation of the Jews to Zion, as 
their native home. See on chap. xxi. 
13, and comp. 1 Kings xvi. 24, and 
2 Kings v. 23. The prophet views 
them in a state of banishment, but 
predicts their return. In im, the 
vowels are transposed for Tn For 
the same transposition, see Gen, xliii. 
29. 

20. The ) in 752) is not copulative, 
but concessive. 0 has here retained 
the form of the absolute, instead of 
being put in the construct. Comp. 
Ezek. xlvii. 4. The bread and water 
of affliction, &c. are such small quan- 
tities, as can with difficulty be ob- 
tained in times of extreme distress. 
Ὑπὸ, fo press, squeeze, oppress. Arab. 


CHAM. 50x: | 


ISATAH. 


Yet thy teachers shall no longer hide themselves, 
But thine eyes shall see thy teachers ; 


21 


And thine ears shall hear a word behind thee, saying: 


This is the way, walk ye in it: 
When ye turn to the right, or to the left. 


22 
images ; 


And ye shall treat as defiled the silver coverings of your graven 


And the golden attire of your molten images ; 
Thou shalt cast them away as a menstruous cloth: 
Thou shalt say to them: Begone! 


23 


Then he will give rain to thy seed, 


With which thou shalt sow the ground ; 
And the bread-corn, the produce of the ground, shall also be 


rich and plenteous : 


« In that day shall thy cattle feed in large pasturage. 


ues Conj. II. ix angustias redegit, 
pressit ; ᾿Ξ importunus pressit aliquem ; 


joie , angusti@. *3, a ἅπαξ dey. but 
obviously signifying fo cover, hide, &c. 
Arab. passe custodivit rem, and in 
Conjugations II. V. and VIII. cireun- 


dedit, cinzit. Hence, 33, a wing; ον, 
Feng » tutela, protectio. 'The Niph. is 


to be taken not as a passive, but as 
a reflexive ; and indicates that the 
Jewish teachers would no longer hide 
themselves, or seek protection in 
secret from their persecutors, but 
discharge the duties of their office 
publicly without molestation, in their 
own land. 9H, “ thy teachers,” Mun- 
ster, Calvin, and Lowth, render, “the 
timely rain:” a signification which 
the word sometimes has, but which 
ill accords with the connexion,—the 
following verse shewing that instruc- 
tion and not rain is meant. Comp. 
Ps. lxxiv.9. Four or five MSS. read 
ΤΠ ; evidently by correction, with 
a view to make the word agree with 
the singular of the verb. 

21. Their teachers were to be before 
them; but when they declined from 
the right way, their backs would be 


turned to them, consequently, the 
warning voice would be heard behind 
them. The first and last clauses of 
the verse closely cohere. ἸΌΝ stands 
for 17"; the & being used for the ’, 
just as, on the contrary, the Syriac 


~ 9 
has ewan though derived from 
Ν 


sc], 


22, xo, fo treat as polluted, by de- 
stroying. See Deut. vii. 25 ; 2 Kings 
Xxill. 8—16. 75x, properly an ephod, 
or garment, the femin. of 28; but 
here, as parallel with “5, it signifies 
a covering or plating over the body of 
an image. It was commonly of silver 
or gold; hence the περίχρυσα and 
περιάργυρα, mentioned in the Epist. 
of Jeremiah, ver. 38. The bodies of 
the images were frequently of no 
value—consisting merely of stone or 
wood ; but they were richly adorned 
with vestments of the above metals. 
The Ὁ in Oy refers to the gold and 
silver platings before mentioned. The 
Jews, convinced of the abominable 
evil of idolatry, would cast away their 
idols with feelings of utter disgust. 

23—25. Promises of temporal pros- 
perity after the return from Babylon. 
Seasonable rain, plentiful crops, and 
rich pasture, would every where 
abound. yu, rain of seed, means 


208 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XXX. 


24 'The oxen also, and the young asses, that till the ground, 


Shall eat salted provender, 


Which has been winnowed with the shovel and the fan. 


25 


And upon every high mountain and every elevated hill, 


Shall be rills and streams of water, 
In the day of the great slaughter, 


At the falling of the towers. 
26 


Then shall the light of the moon be as the light of the sun, 


And the light of the sun shall be sevenfold, 


As the light of seven days: 


In the day when Jehovah bindeth up the breach of his people, 
And healeth the wound of their stroke. 


the rain necessary to make it grow. 
2d) poI, two synonymes used for the 
sake of intensity. Instead of #379, 
forty-one MSS., originally six more, 
the Sonc., Brix., and Complut. edi- 
tions, and the Vulg. read 72372; but 
the former may also be taken as a 
singular. See Gesen. Heb. Gram. § 90, 
9. 72, properly a lamb, as chap. xvi. 
1, but here employed metonym. for 
pasture in which lambs feed. Comp. 
Ps. Ixv. 14. Root, 193, fo dance, frish. 
Not only would there be abundance 
of grass in the mountainous districts ; 
but there would also be such plenty 
of grain, as to admit of the cattle 
being fed with it. por ™3, farrago 
subacida, i.e. provender mixed up of 
various kinds of grain, and sprinkled 
with salt, so as to give it a higher 
relish. Instead of salt, sour herbs 
were sometimes used. Comp. the 


Arab. (»5.5-» salsa et amara planta ; 
Use» depastus fuit (camelus) amaram 


et salsam plantam. Conj. IV. acidam 
reddidit ; edendam dedit camelo plantam, 


Use> The animals are so fond of 


it, that the Arabs have a proverb: 
“Sweet provender is the food of the 
camels; salted provender their des- 
sert.” ™2, a winnowing shovel or fan, 
used in the East for separating the 
chaff from the grain. The synony- 
mous nM is derived from ™™, and 
describes the instrument as exposing 
the grain to the influence of the 


wind. 07329, fowers, the Targ. under- 
stands figuratively, 212), “the Great.” 
Thus also Aquila, μεγαλυνομένους, and 
Symm., μεγάλους, and rightly. See 
chap. ii. 15. The king of Babylon 
and his nobles are meant, who were 
slain on the capture of that city by 
Cyrus. 

26. The prophet here finishes, by a 
noble climax, his description of the 
great prosperity restored to the Jews. 
While every thing on the earth was 
calculated to inspire them with joy, 
the heavens above presented the most 
exhilarating appearance. The light of 
the moon admitted of comparison 
with that of the sun; but as there 
was no brighter luminary with which 
to compare that of the latter, it is 
multiplied in degree seven times, to 
express its abundance. zh? is used, 
as frequently, to denote prosperity 
and joy. 72257 and m7, the poetical 
names of the moon and the sun, 
heighten the effect. The words, ὙΝ3 
oT ny, are omitted in most copies 
of the LXX. and in the Itala. On 
this ground, and on that of an inter- 
ruption of the rhythm, Lowth, Gesen- 
ius, Hitzig, Rosenmiiller, and Scholz, 
reject them as an explanatory gloss. 
These reasons, however, do not war- 
rant our expunging them from the 
text. They are in all the Heb. MSS., 
and in all the other versions except 
the Arabic, which slavishly follows 
the LXX. The Hexap. Syriac reads : 


{Sras pas [oo Ladcs> σιῤσιο2ο. 


CHAP. XxXx.| 


ISATAH. 


269 


27 Behold! the Name of Jehovah cometh from afar, 
His anger burneth, and dense is the smoke ; 
His lips are full of indignation, 
And his tongue is like devouring fire. 


His breath also is like an overflowing torrent, 


That reacheth to the very neck ; 
He will sift the nations in the sieve of vanity ; 
And a bridle that leadeth astray shall be upon the cheeks of 


the people. 
29. 


Ye shall have singing as in the night of celebrating the feast, 


And joy of heart, like his who marcheth to the pipe, 
Going to the mountain of Jehovah, to the Rock of Israel. 


Nor can much stress be laid on the 
rhythmical construction. Their in- 
sertion is rather in the style of Isaiah 
than otherwise.—The 120, breach, is 
that described ver. 14. 

27. Isaiah now returns to the As- 
syrian invasion, and predicts the 
awful catastrophe, historically de- 
scribed chap. xxxvii. 36. Tim DW, Jeho- 
vah himself interposing in a miraculous 
manner ; DY, vame, being used to de- 
note that by which any one is known 
to be what he really is. Others con- 
sider an illustrious display of the 
Divine glory to be meant. Grotius: 
“Deus omni laude  dignissimus.” 
Zwinglius : “ Nomen Domini pro ejus 
Maiestate ac potentia capi, vulgare est 
in scripturis.” ΡΙΤΥΘΌ, some take in a 
temporal sense, long ago; but after 
verbs of coming it always refers to 
place. God is said to be at a distance 
from persons, when he has withdrawn 
from them the sensible tokens of 
his favour. It was thus with the 
Jews, at the period here described ; 
but Jehovah would suddenly return 
for their deliverance at the moment 
of their extremity. “Nw, smoke, from 
Nw, fo rise, gO up as flame, smoke, Kc. 
Comp. Judges xx. 38, 40. The lan- 
guage of this and the following verse 
is highly anthropopathic. Comp. Ps. 
XViii. 

28, am war, shall divide to the 
neck, i.e. reaching so high as to leave 
only the head above the water, and 
thus, in appearance, dividing it from 
the body. The figure expresses ex- 


treme danger. 72272 is a Chaldee 
form of the Infinitive, with its future 
signification, for 729). It seems pur- 
posely chosen to correspond in sound 
with the following 52. Comp. for, 
the image, chap. xli. 16. By “the 
sieve of vanity” is meant that which 
would completely separate, scatter, 
and so reduce to nothing. Yn 7D), 
ὦ bit or bridle that causeth to wander ; 
1.6. Which leads out of the road, and 
draws into destruction. Comp. chap. 
XXXVili. 29. 

29. Great should be the exultation 
of the Jews at the destruction of the 
Assyrians. The prophet compares it 
with that which they indulged in at 
the celebration of the passover, and 
that of the travelling companies 
which came up to keep the annual 
festivals at Jerusalem. 27 is used 
here κατ᾽ ἐξοχὴν, like ἡ ἑορτὴ in the 
N. T. of the paschal feast. This fes- 
tival was celebrated af night, Exod. 
xl. 42; and its celebration partly 
consisted in songs commemorative of 
delivering mercy, or the great Hailel, 
comprising the exiiith and four fol- 
lowing Psalms, Matt. xxvi. 30. For 
the joy of those going up in caravans 
to the holy city, and anticipating the 
privileges to be there enjoyed, see Ps. 
Ixxxiv. exxii. It would appear, from 
the present text, that they employed 
musical instruments to cheer them on 
their way. For 23, three of the ear- 
liest editions read %23,—a change by 
no means unusual. 


270 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XXX. 


30 For Jehovah shall cause his glorious voice to be heard, 
And make visible the descent of his arm, 
With furious anger, and a flame of devouring fire, 
A flood, a rushing storm, and hailstones. 


31 


Verily, by the voice of Jehovah shall Assyria be broken, 


He shall smite him with the rod. 


32 


And every stroke of the appointed rod 


Which Jehovah shall lay upon him, 

Shall be accompanied with tabrets and harps ; 

And with tumultuous battles shall he fight against him. . 
33 For long ago hath Tophet been prepared ; 


30. When no words or articulate 
sounds are mentioned as accompany- 
ing “the voice of Jehovah,” it signi- 
fies thunder. See Ps. xxix. The phrase, 
however, in this place is figurative. 
For vit nt, comp, 2 mmm, Ps. xxxviil. 
3. Both phrases express the coming 
down and resting of Divine chastise- 
ment or punishment on any one. 
nm] may here most naturally be re- 
ferred to the root, ΠΤ, signifying ¢o 
descend : as occurring ver. 15, it is to 
be derived from ™:, ¢o rest, remain 
tranquil, as Od from md. As none of 
the collated MSS. and πὸ printed 
edition before that of Van der Hooght 
reads Yx for 7X, it must be regarded as 
a typographical error. See De Rossi. 

31, 32. v2} and ΠΘῸ are combined 
in the prophet’s usual style. The 
nomin. to 72 is M7, not Wx, Comp. 
chap. xxxvil. 36. 299, lit. pass, and 
nearly in the acceptation of this 
English term, as used to denote a 
push, or thrust in fencing. I have 
rendered it s¢roke,—this being what is 
effected by causing a rod or staff to 
pass on a person by way of punish- 
ment. Wo ΠΡΌ, the rod of appoint- 
ment, from o:, to found, establish, 
ordain, means the chastisement which 
God had purposed to inflict on the As- 
syrians. Comp. Hab. i. 12. Lowth’s 
change of 770%) into ™o%, correction, 
is equally unwarranted and unneces- 
sary. Jarchi, Vitringa, Hocheisel, 
Rosenmiiller, and Jenour, suppose the 
Assyrian power itself to be intended 
by the staff here mentioned, on the 
ground of its being so called, chap. x. 


5, 15, 24; but the above construction 
better suits the connexion.—The 
tabrets and harps are those of the 
Jews rejoicing at the discomfiture of 
their enemy. Comp. ver. 29. nian 
is in the plural, for the sake of in- 
tensity. For 73, iz her, i.e. Assyria ; 
the Keri, which reads 03, in them, i.e. 
the Assyrians, is supported by the 
textual lection of forty-four MSS., 
originally nineteen others, and pro- 
bably a few more ; and by the Sonc., 
Brix., and Complut. Editions, the 
Targ. and the Vulg. The 7 has most 
probably arisen from a mistake in 
reading the final Ὁ, 12 would otherwise 
be the correct gender. 

33. Sons was employed by the He- 
brews, not merely to express yesterday, 
strictly taken, but past time inde- 
finitely. Here it is evidently ‘used of 
a very ancient period, or eternity: the 
date of the Divine purpose. Comp. χθὲς, 
Heb. xiii. 8. LXX. πρὸ ἡμερῶν. Syr. 

9 τ 


τ Go. Tos. TH 


Zwing. ab eterno. Comp. also the Arab. 


* ve . . 
es » mora. dels ,ensis antiquus, multo 


tempore non politus. 2 occurs only 
in this place, but obviously, from the 
accompanying attributes, the same as 
nen, Zophet ; the place in the valley 
of the sons of Hinnom, on the south 
side of Jerusalem, where the idolatrous 
Jews sacrificed their children by burn- 
ing them in honour of Moloch. It 
was afterwards made the receptacle 
of ordure and all manner of filth, in 
order to render it an object of eternal 


CHAP. XXXI.] 


ISATAH. 


271 


It hath even been made ready for the king, deep and wide; 
The pile thereof is fire and abundance of wood : 
The breath of Jehovah, as a torrent of sulphur, shall kindle it. 


abomination ; and fires were con- 
stantly kept burning in it, to consume 
what was thrown into it, and thereby 
prevent putrefaction. From these 
circumstances, 0373, Gr. Γέεννα, came 
metaphorically to signify the place of 
punishment in the eternal world. See 
Matt. v. 22, xxiii. 15, 33. Buxtorf, 
Lex. Chal. Rab. 395, 2623. Gesen. 
Thesaur. iz voc. The latter author is 
inclined to derive 7757 from the Persic, 


_ pod , to kindle, burn, &c.; but neither 


this etymology, nor that of )2n, to deat 
a tabret or drum, seems so appro- 
priate as the derivation which refers 


both neh and mma to the Arab. 235, 
Wuat, divit \a5 in aliquem, i.e. re- 
pudiavit, detestatus fuit ; Ἰὼ) being an 
adverb of detesting, abhorring, &c. 


ow 


Comp. also «1.9, sordes, squalor ; 
rat) » spuit, expuit salivam; Eth. 


TGA : thid. Chald. ἢν, ¢o spit, spit 


with contempt. By Tophet, therefore, 
is meant the place of detestation ; and, 
figuratively, that of punishment. See 
chap. Ixvi. 24; Dan. xii. 2. As to 
the form, it is anomalous only so far 
as the Kametz is concerned ; there 
being several instances of feminine 
nouns ending in Segol. The Keri, »7, 
is found in a great number of MSS. 
and several printed editions, and is 
probably the original reading. ‘7%, 
a pile or round heap of wood, from ¥7, 


to move or be round. Arab. J); the 


same. The pron. affix refers to Mnpn ; 
and that in 72 to 7. The whole 
passage furnishes one of the finest 
specimens of figurative description to 
be met with in the Bible; and the 
vengeance taken on the impious king 
of Assyria and his army, as here set 
forth, is emblematical both of the 
destruction. of Antichrist, as described 
in the Apocalypse, and of the wicked 
generally in the world to come. 


CHAPTER ΧΧΧΙ. 


The folly of the Jews in applying to Egypt for help, instead of confiding in 
the Divine protection, 1—3; a gracious promise of deliverance and pro- 
tection, 4, 5; a call to repentance and reformation, 6, 7; and another 
specific prediction of the miraculous destruction of Sennacherib and his 
army, 8, 9, form the subject-matter of the present chapter. It appears to 
have been added in confirmation of that which precedes it. 


1 Wo to them that go down to Egypt for help, 


And rely upon horses ; 


1. Comp. chap. xxx. 2, 16. That 


breeding of horses, and their using 


the Egyptians were noted at'a very them in chariots, appears from Gen. 
early period for their attention to the xlvii. 17, 1. 9 ; Exod. ix. 3, xiv. 7, 9. 


212 


That trust in chariots, because 


ISATAH. 


(CHAP. XXXI. 


they are many, 


And on horsemen, because their number is great ; 
But look not to the Holy One of Israel, 


And resort not to Jehovah. 


Yet He also is wise, and will bring calamity ; 


For he will not recall his words, 
But will arise against the house of evil doers, 
And against the help of the workers of iniquity. 


For the Egyptians are men, and not God; 


And their horses flesh, and not spirit : 
When Jehovah shall stretch forth his hand, 


The helper shall stumble, and 


the helped shall fall ; 


Yea, they shall all of them perish together. 


For thus saith Jehovah to me: 


As the lion, with the young lion, growls over his prey, 
When a multitude of shepherds is called forth against him ; 
He is not terrified by their shout, 


According to Diod. Sic. i. 45, the 
whole region from Thebes to Mem- 
phis was full of royal stalls ; and such 
was the abundance of horses, that no 
fewer than twenty thousand chariots, 
each having two, were furnished by 
them in times of war. In the reign 
of Solomon, vast numbers both of 
horses and chariots were procured at 
great expense from Egypt, 1 Kings x. 
26, 28,29; 2 Chron.i. 14—17. Comp. 
liad, ix. 383. 

2. This verse commences with the 
language of irony, to meet the proud 
boasting of the infidel party among 
the Jews, chap. xxix. 14—16, and 
that of the Egyptians, chap. xix. 11, 
in whom they trusted. The words 
vindicate to Jehovah the skill and 
power adequate to inflict punishment 
on both the contracting parties, to- 
gether with veracity in carrying his 
threatenings into execution. Comp. 
Numb. xxiii. 19; 1 Sam. xv. 29. 13, 
evil, in the sense of calamity, punish- 
ment. The O'yy2 ma and PR YD are 
synonymous, and designate the re- 
bellious Jews. By 77, the Egyptians 
are meant. The 1in is omitted in 
upwards of fifty MSS., six printed 
editions, and in the LXX., Vulg., and 
+ Avab. 


3. 8, lit. The Powerful One, from >x, 
to be mighty, strong, is adopted, instead 
of Dv>x, to render the antithesis the 
more pointed. “God” and “man,” 
“spirit” and “flesh,” are strikingly 
contrasted with each other. The 
contrast in the latter case is evidently 
founded on the fact, that the body 
without the soul is utterly powerless, 
but animated by it as an energetic 
principle, is capable of achieving 
mighty deeds. The seat of human 
strength is in the mind. In Wy and 
ay is an elegant paronomasia. Both 
participles are collectives. What had 
been denounced in the latter part of 
the previous verse is here more em- 
phatically repeated. The destruction 
of the confederates would be complete : 
a prediction which was fulfilled when 
Nebuchadnezzar invaded Judea and 
Egypt. 

4, 2 is used causatively. A sudden 
and unexpected turn is given to the 
message of the prophet. Though 
Jehovah would punish the rebellious, 
yet he would appear on behalf of 
those who feared him, and for their 
sakes would deliver Jerusalem. The 
image of a lion, to represent the 
power of God, is not unfrequent, Hos. 
v. 14, xi. 10, xiii. 7, 8; Amos iu. 8; 


CHAP. XXXI.] 


ISAIAH. 


273 


Nor discouraged by their tumult : 
So Jehovah of Hosts shall come down, 
To fight for Mount Zion, and for her hill. 


As birds covering their young, 


So Jehovah of Hosts shall protect Jerusalem, 


Protecting and delivering, 
Sparing and rescuing. 
Return ye to Him 


From whom the children of Israel have deeply revolted. 


Surely, in that day shall they treat with contempt, 


Hach his idols of silver and his idols of gold, 
Which your hands made to you for sin! 
8 For the Assyrian shall fall by no human sword ; 


Rev. v. 5. Between the imagery here 
employed and that of Homer, Iliad, 
ΧΙ]. 299, xviii. 161, there is a strict 
coincidence. The vast army of the 
Assyrians were as nothing in the 
estimation of Jehovah. He viewed 
unperturbed their attempt to seize 
the locality which he had chosen as 
his special residence. 

5. Fv is here used in the sense of 
covering, comp. HY; and not in that of 
Jtying, as given in our common version, 
which does not furnish a suitable point 
of comparison. The image is taken 
from the protection which birds afford 
to their young, by throwing their wings 
over them. Comp. Deut. xxxii. 11; 
Matt. xxiii. 37. The Infinitives }i22 and 
ΤῸ indicate continuous action, and 
are used elliptically for the Infin. and 
' Fut. combined. This accounts for the 
Preterites 727 and 7 with the Vau 
conversive, which Kocher, Rosen- 
miller, and Gesenius, would point 
>zo and ὌΠ, to make them corre- 
spond to the other Infinitives. The 
verb 708 is selected with special refer- 
ence to the protection extended to 
the Israelites in Egypt, when the 
Lord mercifully interposed to prevent 
the destroying angel from entering 
their houses. It properly signifies to 
pass over, and figuratively, to spare, as 
here. Hence "02, the Passover, which 
was instituted in commemoration of 
the sparing mercy of Jehovah towards 
his people. Josephus : ὑπερβασία:; 
Philo : διαβατήρια ; Aquila: ὑπέρβασις ; 


and Aquila, Symm., and Theod., in 
the present passage, ὑπερβαίνων ; and 
the Pacom. MS. περιβήσεται: : —all 
which authorities go to invalidate the 
reasoning of Lowth, who contends 
that the verb here signifies, ¢o leap or 
spring forward. The Bishop’s note is 
otherwise ingenious; but his con- 
struction of Exod. xii. 23 is quite un- 
tenable, it being expressly stated that 
it was Jehovah himself that should 
pass through to smite the Egyptians, 
as well as to spare the Hebrews. The 
idea of a sudden leap or spring would 
ill comport with the form of the verb 
as used by Isaiah ; and when it does 
occur in the sense of leaping, it has 
always a reference to a halting, forced 
springing, or limping, as if from a 
wrench or dislocation. See 2 Sam. iv. 
4; 1 Kings xviii. 21, 26. 

6. An argument enforcing repent- 
ance is drawn from the preceding pro- 
mises of Divine interposition. Comp. 
Rom. ii. 4. The guilt of the Israelites 
was great; but on their turning to 
God, they would meet with a gracious 
reception. 

7. This verse contains an assurance 
that such conversion would take place ; 
and that the Jews would bring forth 
fruits meet forrepentance. ΝΠ stands 
for xom, and denotes the object of 
sin, 1.6. ΓΝ idol or idols. Comp. 
Deut, ix. 18; Amos viii. 14. 

8, 9. By ow Μὴ and Diy XN) is meant 


Jehovah himself. See for this idiom, 


on chap. x. 15. To prevent the repe- 


214 


ISAIAH. 


[cHAP, XXXII. 


The sword of Him who is not man shall devour him : 
Yea, he shall flee before the sword, 
And his choice warriors shall be tributary. 

9 ΤῸ his rock also he shall pass through fear, 
And his captains shall be dismayed at the standard, 
Saith Jehovah, whose fire is in Zion, 


And his furnace in Jerusalem. 


tition of “man” in the translation, I 
have been obliged to change the idiom 
in the former instance. One of Kenni- 
cott’s MSS., one of De Rossi’s at first 
hand, and the Soncin. Edit. read δ 
instead of 1); but though supported 
by the LXX., Arab., and Vulg., and 
approved by Déderlein, this reading is 
inferior to that of the Textus Receptus. 
According to the usus loquendi, 022 7 
means ¢o become tributary, and not as 
some would render, fo mel¢ away, con- 
sume, though such is the signification 
of Dop.—r1y’—iy9 does not mean ἔο 
pass by or beyond his rock or fortress, as 
Vitringa, Lowth, Gesenius, Boothroyd, 
and Jenour, interpret; but ¢o pass on 
to it. For this signification of Ἂν 
governing an accusative, see chap. xvi. 
8. Hitzig and Scholz take »%> in the 


sense of military forces; but this 
acceptation of the word is nowhere to 
be met with, and otherwise contradicts 
the fact of the case. Nor is D2 to be 
rendered flight, as Lowth and Booth- 
royd give it; but the constant accep- 
tation, standard, is to be retained,— 
that of Jehovah being intended. For 
the concluding words, comp. chap. 
xxix. 1, only there is here a special 
reference to the sacrifice of the 
Assyrian army, which Jehovah was 
to consume. 

These two verses very clearly pre- 
dict the miraculous destruction of the 
Assyrians before Jerusalem ; the servi- 
tude to which such of the warriors as 
survived should be reduced ; and the 
flight of Sennacherib and his staff to 
Nineveh. See chap. xxxvii, 36, 37. 


Sa 


CHAPTER XXXII. 


This chapter contains a prophecy of the nature of Messiah’s reign ; and the 
character and happy security of those who submit to him, 1—8; a de- 
scription of the desolate condition of Judza during his reign, 9—14; and 
intimations of a glorious change in the condition of the Jews, which should 
result from the effusion of the Holy Spirit, 15—20. 


1 BEHOLD, a king shall reign righteously, 


1. The prophet, in his usual style, 
makes a sudden transition from the 
destruction of the impious power of 
the Assyrians, predicted at the close 
of the previous chapter, to the holy 
and spiritual rule of Christ. Comp. 


chap. ix. 4—7, x. xi. That this chap- 
ter is a continuation of the foregoing 
discourse is allowed by Déderlein, 
Dathe, Hensler, Gesenius, Rosen- 
miiller, and Hitzig. The prophecy 
having been delivered on the eve of 


CHAP. XXXII.] 


And princes shall rule justly. 


ISATAH. 


275 


2 Yea, a man shall be as a hiding-place from the wind, 
And a shelter from the tempest ; 
As rills of water‘in a dry region, 
As the shade of a great rock in a weary land. 
3 The eyes also of those that see shall not be obscured, 
And the ears of those that hear shall attend. 
4 And the heart of the rash shall discern knowledge, 
And the tongue of the stammerers shall be prompt to speak 


clearly. 


Sennacherib’s invasion, and distinctly 
referring to what was to take place 
subsequent to the time of Hezekiah, 
it cannot describe that monarch, 
either exclusively, as the Rabbins, and 
after them Grotius and others main- 
tain, or Hezekiah primarily, and, in 
a secondary sense, the Messiah, as 
most commentators contend; but 
must be interpreted of the latter 
exclusively. 772 72 has its exact 
parallel in 9 722; and py? and 
eeu? correspond to MT! ΒΦ, Jer. 
xxii. 5. Comp. Isa. ix. 6, x1.5; Zech. 
ix. 9. The princes or rulers spoken of, 
are the Apostles, who, as our Saviour 
declares, were in the παλιγγενεσία, or 
new state of things which took place 
at the introduction of Christianity, to 
“sit upon twelve thrones, judging the 
twelve tribes of Israel,” Matt. xix. 28. 
They alone, as inspired by the Holy 
Ghost, were invested with infallible 
authority under the king of Sion. }in 
ow is better resolved by rendering 
it, quantum ad, quod attinet ad, than by 
regarding it as properly forming part 
of the nominative. Comp. for a 
similar usage, Josh. xxi. 20; Job. xvi. 
21; Ps. xvi. 3, xvii. 4; and especially 
Eccles. ix. 4. Some, however, after 
Kimchi, think it redundant. 

2. wx cannot, without violence to 
the connexion, be taken distributively 
of the rulers just mentioned, but must 
be referred to the king who was to 
rule in righteousness. It is used with 
emphasis of the Messiah, as ποτ, 
Zech. vi. 12. To interpret the sublime 
imagery of this verse in application to 
a mere human being would be quite 
repugnant to the spirit of the sacred 


writers, by whom Jehovah alone is 
represented as the source of protection 
and refreshment to his people, and all 
trust in creatures solemnly inter- 
dicted. To the weary traveller under 
a vertical sun nothing can be more 
gratifying than the shade of a huge 
projecting rock, and the water of a 
cooling stream; just as a place of 
shelter is appreciated by him who is 
exposed to the resistless violence of 
a storm. Comp. the sazea umbra of 
Virg., Georg. 11. 145, and the πετραίη 
oxen of Hesiod, ii. 206. 

3, 4. For the force of 77pm, see on 
chap. vi. 10. The meaning of the 
verses is, that the impediments to 
spiritual perception and obedience 
being removed, the subjects of Mes- 
siah’s reign would be endowed with 
true knowledge and right dispositions. 
Even those who might seem to labour 
under insuperable difficulties would 
surmount them with ease. 0793, 
rash, precipitate ; persons who are so 
hasty, that they cannot take time to 
acquire solid knowledge, and conse- 
quently, are the dupes of deception 
and error. λον, the same as 032; 
such as speak in a stammering or bar- 
barous manner. LXX. ψελλίζουσι. 
Vulg. dalborum. Comp. the Arab. 


e- , barbarus, crassus barbarus, re- 
* 


ligionem non profitens. The term is 
here to be taken in a religious sense, 
as designating those who, from their 
ignorance of Divine things, cannot 
speak of them intelligibly. Such, the 
prophet declares, would, in the new 
state of things, speak nin3, clearly, with 
perspicuity, so as to be understood by 


210 


or 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP, XXXII. 


The vile shall no more be called liberal, 


Nor shall it be said of the miser, He is rich. 
6 But the vile will utter what is vile, 
And his heart will frame iniquity ; 
Acting profanely, and uttering error respecting Jehovah ; 
Leaving empty the soul of the hungry, 
And suffering the drink of the thirsty to fail. 
7 And as for the miser, his instruments are wicked ; 
He plotteth mischievous devices ; 
To destroy the poor with words of falsehood, 
And the needy, when he speaketh what is right. 
8 But the liberal deviseth liberal deeds, 


all. Root mz, cog. My, to be bright, 
v 
ass amy 


ee} 
to thirst, be dry, shine; Arab. ran 


Sol, et lua ejus ; oe , manifestus 
ac evidens fuit; \x?, conspicua fuit. 


sunny, parched, dry; Avram. ¢ 


Symm. τρανά. Vulg. clara. 

5, 6. 922 is one of the strongest 
words in Hebrew, expressive of utter 
worthlessness of character :—aban- 
doned, vile, shameful, reckless of the 
regard both of God and man. In our 
common version it is generally ren- 
dered fool, and 7223, folly; but the 
connexion often shews that such terms 
are far below the force of the original. 
See Job 11. 10; Ps. xiv. 1; Judges 
xix. 23, 24, xx. 6; and the present 
connexion. It denotes the want, not 
of intellectual, but of moral qualities, 
and the unchecked dominion of a de- 
praved bias of heart. Instead of 
indicating a mere defect, it involves 
a settled and determined opposition 
to all that is holy, a state of which 
moral turpitude is the element. The 
root properly signifies, 70 wither, become 
flaccid, as leaves, flowers, Xe. ; hence, 
by easy transfer, its moral acceptation. 
For the paronomasia, 72) 522, comp. 
1 Sam. xxv. 25. ἸῸΝ may iow 32, In 
yorn, at the end of ver. 6, there is a 
return from the use of the Infin. to 
the direct form of the verb with which 
the verse commences. See for 32 and 
3, the following verses. viv is used 


in its usual acceptation, wealthy, opu- 
lent; from yr, tg. 1, Arab. ey 
amplus fuit. NV. divitiis abundawit ; 
dew, opulentia ; eyo dives, potens. 


The signification, /iberal, is less apt, 
as it is too much even for flattery to 
give this epithet to the miser. A due 
discrimination of character would be 
made in the times of the Messiah, and 
persons and things would be called by 
their appropriate names. Comp. Mal. 
iii. 18; Matt. xxiii. 13—33; Luke xii. 
20, 21; Eph. v. 5. 

7, 8. 3 is the same as YD in the 
preceding verse, only it is slightly 
changed to form a paronomasia with 
ys) immediately following. Hitzig 
derives it from 23, in Piel, to consume, 
waste ; and renders it waster. Dodson : 
prodigal. Gesenius and Winer, on the 
authority of the Vulg., fraudulentus, 
refer it to 521 as its root; but the 
derivation is forced. It is more 
natural to refer it to 3, to hold, con- 
tain, retain, keep back. Comp. 8%, 


Arab. JS » mensuravit, mensurando 


dedit. us » tnstrumentum, quo mensura 
“ 


definitur. Kimchi, availing himself of 
this use of the cognate Arabic verb, 
explains it of the parsimonious, who 
measures out what he is compelled to 
give in the most niggardly manner. 
It forcibly describes the tenacious, 
griping character of the miser. Co- 
verdale: the covetous. As to form, 


CHAP. XXXII. | 


ISATAH. 


211 


And in liberal deeds he will persevere. 
9 Ye women at ease! Arise, hear my voice ; 
Ye confident daughters! give ear to my speech. 
10 In little more than a year shall ye be disquieted, ye confident 


ones ! 


For the vintage faileth ; the fruit-harvest cometh not. 
11 Tremble, ye that are at ease; be alarmed, ye confident ones ; 


Strip, make yourselves bare ; 
Put a girdle on your loins. 


comp. 21, from 27, 12 from 7, &c. 
The 5 is merely an augment, as in 
“in, 123, &c. 0% means the instru- 
ments, measures, or means, by which 
the avaricious seeks to increase his 
pelf. These are not only declared to 
be wicked, but instances of oppression 
and injustice are adduced.—In ΠῚ2)12---- 
ni2’7) 272 is another of Isaiah’s favourite 
paronomasias. The root, 373, signifies 
to impel, incite ; in Hithp. to impel one- 
self, to give willingly, liberally, &e. 


Comp. the Arab. Weds, instigavit, 
impulit ; \“—miSd, agilis et expeditus, et 


egregius, pulcher fuit ; mS, Ingenuosus, 


pulcher, generosus. Hence, 172 means 
a princely, noble, liberal, character. 
oy DP usually means ¢o rise against, 
stand opposed, &c., but is here obviously 
to be taken in the sense of continuing 
or persevering in the noble deeds pre- 


dicted. Comp. the Arab. ust “3: 


intentus fuit re, perseveravit ; and Καλῶν 
ἔργων προΐστασθαι, Tit. iii, 8, 14. 
According to this and other descrip- 
tions of the character of Messiah’s 
subjects, they are distinguished by 
a noble-minded liberality; contriving 
and persevering in the execution of 
enlarged schemes.of benevolence. See 
especially Ps. cx. 3, where they are 
described as n372 DY, a people of volun- 
tarinesses, 1.6. readily devoting them- 
selves and all that they have to the 
service of their Divine Lord. For the 
fulfilment, see Acts 11, 44, 45, iv. 32— 
37; 2 Cor. viii. 1—4, ix. 2; Heb. vi. 
10. 

9, The prophet returns abruptly to 


his own times, and addressing himself 
toa company of careless females whom 
he espies, takes occasion to predict the 
disastrous events that would happen 
to the nation to which they belonged, 
and of which they might, in their 
present posture, be considered the 
representatives. Some interpreters, 
after Theodoret, among whom Vitrin- 
ga, are of opinion, that by Ὁ ὩΣ, ccties, 
and not women, literally taken, are in- 
tended; but the term is never so used 
except in allegory, as Ezek. xvi. 28%, 
properly ¢o enjoy quiet or rest; but 
here, in a bad sense, to indulge in carnal 
security. 'The same remark’ applies to 
moa, Comp. chap. ii.16. The form 
of address is that of Lamech to his 
wives, Gen. iv. 23. 

10. The phrase, ποῦ >Y 0D), is anom- 
alous ; lit. days over a year. ‘The pre- 
pos. is obviously used to convey the 
idea of superaddition ; but whether 
nm, days, are to be understood defi- 
nitely, as signifying the longest com- 
plement of days; viz. a year,—in 
which case, the phrase would be 
equivalent to ποῦν ποῦ, chap. xxix. 1; 
or whether they are to be taken in an 
indefinite sense, has been contested. 


The Syr. {ASco., and the Arab. Leb], 


some days, would seem to favour the 
latter construction. In all probability, 
the prophet indicates the near ap- 
proach of the Assyrian invasion. 

11. > is of *he mase. gender, as 
are also the .ilowing Imperatives, 
with 7 paragogic, because both it and 
m2 occur before the nouns to which 
they refer. See Ewald, § 567. ὉΔΦΒ is 
very appropriately employed to denote 
the removal of the splendid garments 


M M 


218 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XXXII. 


12 They smite themselves on the breasts, 
On account of the pleasant fields, 
On account of the fruitful vine. 


13 


Upon the land of my people shall come up thorns and briers ; 


Yea, upon all the joyous houses in the exulting city. 


14 


For the palace shall be deserted ; 


The wealth of the city shall be abandoned ; 
Ophel and the watch-tower shall long be converted into dens ; 
The joy of wild asses, the pasture of flocks ; 

15 Till the Spirit be poured out upon us from above ; 


in which the persons here addressed 
were arrayed, in order that, in their 
stead, they might put on sackcloth. 
In 727 the substantive pv, sackcloth, 
is understood. 7 is not from ἫΝ, 
but from "WY, 7.¢g. TY, ¢o be, or make 
oneself naked. 

12. To give greater effect to his 
language, the prophet, as frequently, 
drops the personal form of address, 
and assumes the descriptive style, by 
adopting the Ben. participle. oO y 
pd, icolampadius, Déderlein, Dathe, 
Gesenius in his Translation, Hitzig, 
Jenour, and Scholz, render: “They 
mourn on account of the fields,”— 
changing 078 into Oo, and maintain- 
ing that ἼΒΌ is used not of the gesture, 
but of the sound of mourning. They 
also urge that >, following this verb, 
always refers to the cause of the grief. 
In his larger Lexicon, however, pub- 
lished in 1838, Gesenius abandons 
these positions, and renders: “ they 
smite upon the breasts.” He is 
followed by Maurer. Coverdale has : 
Ye shall-knock upon your breasts. Thus 
also the LXX. ἐπὶ τῶν μαστῶν κόπτεσθε: 
the Targ. γ᾽ p71 "5, Vulg. super ubera 


v yv 
plangite ; and the Syr. eatiarZ “So 


Ve 
tr]. The primary signification of 


2D is that of eating; and both its 
sound and signification are retained 
in the Gr. σφαδάζω, the Sanscrit, 
sphud, sphut. Our own translators 
appear to have understood by “the 
teats,” the οὖθαρ ἀρούρης of Homer, 
liad, ix. 141. Only one of De Rossi’s 
MSS. reads 01%; but instead of the 


foliowing "1, the reading 770 is found 
in fourteen MSS., was originally in 
seven more, and probably in another ; 
is found in the Sone. Bib. and Proph., 
the Brix., and Kennicott’s, 253; the 
LXX., Arab., Aquila, Symm., Theod., 
Syr., and Vulg.; and is in all proba- 
bility the true reading—the plural of 
mw being nity, not oY or OTD. It is, 
nevertheless, used as a noun of multi- 
tude. The nomin. to 0759 is not 0%, 
women, ver. 9; but the Jews, under- 
stood, who should live in after times, 
while the following predictions were 
being fulfilled. 

13. Yaw YP, an instance of the con- 
structio asyndeta, as in chap. xxvii. 4. 
In this and the following verse, a pro- 
spective view is given of the deserted 
condition of Judzea, subsequent to the 
destruction of Jerusalem by the Ro- 
mans. Comp. chap. vii. 23, 24. 33, 
imo, yes indeed. Before Mp, subaud. 3. 

14, 5%, Ophel, properly a fill or 
mound, but is specially used to denote 
a fortified height, forming part of 
Mount Sion on the east, near Moriah. 
ὈΡΊ ΣΤΡ is here to be taken in a limited 
sense, as intimating only along period, 
as the use of τὸ in the following verse 
shews. 

15. Dyan MH ary mw. Till the 
Spirit be poured out wpon us from above. 
As the verb vy, in its different con- 
jugations, signifies ¢o make bare, empty; 
pour out fully or completely, it is obvious 
the prophet cannot refer to any partial 
communication of Divine influence at 
the return from Babylon, but must 
have in view some copious effusion of 
the Spirit in connexion with the reign 
of Christ foretold at the beginning of 


CHAP, XXXII.] 


ISAIAH. 


279 


Then shall the wilderness become a fruitful field, 
And the fruitful field shall be esteemed a forest. 


16 


Then also shall justice dwell in the desert, 


And righteousness shall inhabit the fruitful field. 


17 


And the effect of righteousness shall be peace, 


And the result of righteousness shall be quiet and security for 


ever. 


For my people shall dwell in peaceful habitations, 


In secure abodes, and tranquil resting-places : 


19 


But it shall hail at the falling of the forest ; 


And the city shall be low in depression. 


Happy ye that sow beside all waters ; 


That send forth the foot of the ox and the ass. 


the chapter. Most interpreters think 
the same effusion is intended which is 
spoken of by Joel, chap. ii. 28, which 
we know took place on the day of Pen- 
tecost, Acts 11. 16—21; but to this 
application of the words it must be 
objected, that the desolate state of the 
Jewish affairs is predicted to last till 
the effusion takes place ; whereas 
prosperity was restored to the Jews 
at the close of the captivity, 7.e. about 
five centuries before the commence- 
ment of the Christian dispensation. 
I cannot, therefore, but interpret the 
passage of a remarkable outpouring of 
the Holy Spirit yet future, when the 
great body of the Jewish nation (τὸ 
πλήρωμα αὐτῶν, Rom. xi. 12) shall, in 
consequence, be converted to God. 
The 1 in ™7) marks the apodosis. For 
the rest of the verse, see on chap. 
ἜΣΙΧ: 17. 

16—18. 72793, in that which had been 
a desert: 72753, in that which has become 
a fruitful field. This and the following 
verse describe the spiritual and happy 
results of the remarkable effusion of 
the Holy Spirit, which had just been 
predicted. 2 is here a collective 
noun. In ὈΤΌΣ and nin, ver. 18, 
there seems to be an allusion to ver. 
9. What was only imaginary in the 
case of the Jews living in Isaiah’s 
time, would be experienced by them 
in reality in that of the Messiah. 


19, 20. In these verses are con- 
trasted the destruction of the Jewish 
polity, and the happiness of those 
who should be engaged in propagating 
the gospel throughout the world. By 
the forest is meant the Jewish army 
engaged in the defence of Jerusalem. 
Comp. chap. x. 18, 19, 33, 34, where 
the same image is used of the Assyrian 
army. Hail isan image of Divine judg- 
ments, and betokens their severity. 
Comp. chap xxviii. 2,17; Rev. xi. 19. 
For 173, Kennicott’s Cod. 30, reads 1, 
but all the ancient versions follow the 
received reading. In ΠΤ ΤῺ is a 
paronomasia, as there also is in M5wa 
%tn. Thecity here spoken of isneither 
Nineveh nor Babylon, but Jerusalem, 
mentioned ver. 13. For its depression, 
comp. Matt. xxiv. 2. “Urbs ista ad 
imum statum redigitur.” Dathe. The 
figure, ver. 20, is taken from the 
nomadic life ; and beautifully exhibits 
the free and unrestrained exertions of 
the apostles and other missionaries, in 
sowing the seed of the kingdom in 
every part of the world. 52) 7>% does 
not refer to the employment of the 
animals mentioned to tread the ground 
preparatory to the planting of rice, as 
Sir John Chardin and Lowth suppose, 
but to setting them at liberty from 
the rope with which they were tied. 
by the foot. 


280 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP, XXXIII. 


CHAPTER XXXITI. 


The prophet, in this chapter, delivers his last prediction respecting the 
Assyrians. He announces the retributive justice which they should ex- 
perience at the hand of Jehovah, 1; whose gracious interposition he invokes, 
2; anticipates the results of such interposition, 3—6 ; describes the state 
of the country during the invasion of Sennacherib, 7—9 ; J ehovah’s actual 
interference, and its consequences, 10—12 ; and depicts the alarm of the 
wicked inhabitants of Jerusalem, with which he beautifully contrasts the 
security and felicity of the righteous in the enjoyment of their religious 
privileges, and their exemption from outward molestation, 13—24. 


1 Wo to thee who spoilest, but hast not been spoiled ;. 
And who plunderest, but others have not plundered thee : 
When thou art done with spoiling, thou shalt be spoiled ; 
When thou hast finished plundering, others shall plunder thee. 
2 O Jehovah! have mercy upon us; in thee we trust ; 


1, Sennacherib, as the representative 
of the Assyrian monarchy, is here set 
forth in the character of a ruthless 
conqueror, who has sustained no re- 
verses, but to whose career a limit is 
set, and who is to be subdued in his 
turn. Instead of 421723, upwards of 
sixty MSS. and seven early editions, 
read 12723, but the former alone 
agrees with the connexion. 272, 
apparently from an obsolete root, Dn 
—such being the regular Hiph. Infin. 
of verbs with ) for the middle radical ; 
but evidently, from the connexion, of 
the same signification with Dn, to 
bring to an end, finish, complete. To 
the same root may be referred Din, 
Dyan, completeness. 573, the corre- 
sponding Infin. is less easily accounted 
for. Some derive it from 4%, or 79%, 
to be wearied, exhausted, &e. Thus 
Symm. ὅταν κοπιάσῃ ; Targ. sn, Saad. 


pst] ; Vulg. futigatus, Lowth, 
Hensler, Dathe, in edit. secund, 


Boothroyd, and Noyes. On the other 
hand, Secker, Doderlein, and Ge- 
senius in Lex. Man., approve of the 


conjecture of Cappellus, that instead 
of 4132, we should read ¥7722—the 9 
having been mistaken by some copyist 
for 2. This latter construction might 
seem to derive support from the com- 
bination of On7 and 753, Dan. ix. 24; 
but there is no necessity to abandon 
the Hebrew interpreters, who derive 
the word from 73, and consider it to 
be a contracted form of the Hiph. 
Infin. 779272, like 9193773—the 7 being 
dropped, and compensation being made 
by the Dagesh in the following letter. 
m2, whence 0939, their acquisition, Job 
xv. 29, has the signification of the 


Arab. ων, med. Je, perfecit, ad finem 


oo 
perducit, consummavit ; Syr. fly, depre- 


hendens, to reach an object, obtain, finish. 
Thus Hitzig, Winer, and First. 

2, oy, their arm, i.e. their help, 
protection. See on chap. ix. 19. All 
the MSS. and editions have the third 
personal pronoun ; only the edition of 
Venice, 1518, has in the margin 24 
—a manifest emendation, as is that of 
Houbigant, νῦν. The Syr. and Targ. 


CHAP. XXXIII.| 


ISATAH. 


—Be their arm every morning :— 


Yea, be thou our salvation in the time of distress. 


281 


3 At the sound of the noise the people flee ; 
When thou arisest, the nations are dispersed. 
4 And your spoil shall be gathered up, 
Like the gathering of the devouring locust ; 
As the running of the caterpillar-locust, 


Men shall run upon it. 


5 Jehovah is exalted; for he dwelleth on high ; 
He filleth Zion with justice and righteousness. 
6 He also shall be the stability of thy time; 
A store of salvation, wisdom, and knowledge: 
The fear of Jehovah is his treasure. 


have the first person plural ; but the 
LXX., τὸ σπέρμα τῶν ἀπειθούντων, evi- 
dently read the third. Τῇ, as there is 
every reason to believe, the Ὁ pro- 
ceeded from the pen of the prophet, 
he is to be regarded, in this sentence, 
as giving expression to his own in- 
dividual desire for the Divine pro- 
tection of his people. 0773), ἐμ refer- 
ence to the mornings, i. e. every Morning 
—that being the period when the 
enemy might be expected to renew 
the attack. Comp. the following 
hemistich. 

3. iam 4p being parallel with 7225, 
the thunder accompanying the Divine 
interposition is meant, and not any 
tumult in the hostile army, though 
the phrase otherwise denotes the 
noise of a multitude. 

4, An apostrophic address to the 
Assyrians, in which the prophet 
describes the effect of what he had 
predicted in the preceding verse. The 
enemy having either been destroyed 
or made to flee, the inhabitants of 
Jerusalem would eagerly run up and 
down through the deserted camp, and 
collect the spoils. The comparison to 
the locusts is beautifully graphic. 
Some, indeed, understand the prophet 
to refer to the collection of the locusts 
by the husbandman ; but the active 
forms of ΡῈ and ppv shew that he has 
in view the complete consumption of 
vegetation, fruits, &c. by these insects, 
Comp. Joel 1. 4, 11. 3—9, with New- 


come’s Notes. Before 08 supply 3, 
from the following. ppt, impersonally, 
one, they, men, or the like. 

5, 6. These verses are intimately 
connected. The person addressed, 
ver. 6, is Hezekiah. The nominative 
to m7) is Jehovah, in the verse pre- 
ceding. ΠΌΝΟΝ some render fuith ; 
others fidelity ; but security, stability, 
or such like, is preferable. Comp. the 


Arab. ot! 5 wel, securitas, protectio : 


from ; ᾿" fidit, nivus fuit, securus futt. 


Instead of ΠὩν, thirty-four MSS., origin- 
ally ten more, now one ; upwards of 
thirty printed editions ; the Syr. and 
Symm. read ΠΡ in the singular. For 
the meaning of NY, ¢me, in such con- 
nexion, see Ps, Ixxxi. 15 (Hebr.16). By 
Jehovah’s being the stability of one’s 
time is meant, his being the author of 
the peaceful, settled, and prosperous 
state of things, which, during any given 
period, a person enjoys. ‘Df is used 
in the sense both of s/rength, riches, and 
store, storehouse, &c. Comp. the Arab. 


=, magazine. Thesame sentiment 
Σὰ 


occurs, Job xxii. 25.—ninw, lit. salva- 
tions, 1.6. complete deliverance. Sixteen 
MSS., originally six, and now two, 
substitute 7227 for m227. Several in- 
stances, however, occur of the con- 
struct being similarly used instead of 
the absolute, as 7271 73, chap. xxxv. 2. 


282 ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XXXII. 


7 Behold their Ariel! They raise a cry without ; 
The messengers of peace weep bitterly. 


8 The highways are desolate ; 
The traveller ceaseth ; 


He hath broken the treaty ; the cities are despised ; 


Man is held in no estimation. 


9 The land mourneth ; it languisheth ; 
Lebanon is put to shame; it withereth : 


Sharon is like a desert ; 


Bashan also, and Carmel cast off their leaves. 


7. This and the two following verses 
describe the alarm and distress of 
Judea during the Assyrian invasion. 
Even the inhabitants of the metropolis 
should be in terror. That they are 
intended by the term Ooxyx, I cannot 
doubt. According to the punctuation, 
indeed, it must be differently inter- 
preted ; but this punctuation is so 
perfectly anomalous, that, had it not 
been for an early mis-construction of 
the passage, it never could have ob- 
tained. The Syr., Targ., Aquila, and 
Symm. take it to be compounded of 
the verb 78}, fo see, in Niph. ¢o appear, 
and 02 for 099, ¢o them. To this deri- 
vation videntes of the Vulg. is also to 
bereferred. The LXX. likewise found 
a verb in the word—only they read 
xv, and not73. The parallelism, how- 
ever, requires a noun and not a verb ; 
and no resolution is more easy than 
that furnished by the punctuation 
Dos, according to which the word is 
simply made up of x, Ariel, the 
name given to Jerusalem, chap. xxix. 
1, 2, and Ὁ the pronom. affix, referring 
to the Jews. For the meaning of the 
term, see on the passage just cited. 
The word occurs in this defective form 
2 Sam. xxiii. 20. Michaelis, Lowth, 
Gesenius, Boothroyd, Jenour, and 
others, adopt Os, the reading of 
a few MSS., and render, ¢he heroes, or 
“the mighty,” with which agrees the 
rendering of our common version; but 
the above interpretation, which is 
that supported by Hitzig, Maurer, and 
Scholz, is preferable. That Déderlein 
should have rendered the words legati 
publicos clamores cient, following the 
notion of 78%, angel, messenger, sug- 


gested by the Rabbins, is unaecount- 
able,as the interpretation is altogether 
arbitrary. By metonymy Ariel is put 
for the inhabitants, as the plural 372¥ 
shews. Jerusalem was the glory and 
boast of the nation ; and, as such, atten- 
tion is drawn to it by the prophet ; but 
instead of affording encouragement to 
the Jews at the present crisis, it was 
itself placed in cireumstances of im- 
minent danger. The inhabitants had 
left their houses, and in the streets 
and open places of the city gave vent 
to their cries of distress. By the 
Dis ND are meant Eliakim, and 
Shebna, and Joab, the messengers 
whom Hezekiah sent to negotiate 
peace with Rabshakeh, 2 Kings xviii. 
18, 37, xix. 2. 

8. All intercourse throughout the 
country had ceased. Comp. Judg. v. 
6. The nominative to 7 is Senna- 
cherib, who, having broken the treaty 
into which he had entered with Heze- 
kiah, overran the country, and re- 
garded with contempt its fortified 
places and inhabitants. 

9. A beautiful poetical amplification 
of the description. The most magni- 
ficent and fruitful scenes of nature 
are represented as converted into 
barrenness and desolation. 8 being 
an epicenic noun, admits of the verbs 
being of both genders. Sharon was 
a plain, lying along the Mediterranean, 
between Carmel and Joppa, greatly 
celebrated for its extraordinary beauty 
and fertility. It not only furnished 
the richest pasturage, but abounded 
in agricultural produce. Comp. Song 
li. 1; Isa. xxxv, 2, Ixy; 10. 


CHAP. XXXIII.| 


ISATAH. 


283 


10 Now will I arise, saith Jehovah ; 


Now will I exalt myself; 

Now will I lift myself up. 
Mal 

Your own wrath is @ fire that 


12 And the nations shall be like 


Ye shall conceive chaff; ye shall bring forth stubble ; 


shall devour you. — 
the burning of limestone ; 


Like thorns cut down, they shall be consumed with fire. 


13 


Hear, ye that are far off, what I have done; 


And ye that are near, acknowledge my might. 


14 


The sinners are afraid in Zion ; 


Trembling hath seized on the impious ; 
Which of us can dwell in devouring fire ? 
Which of us can dwell in everlasting burnings ? 


15 He that walketh righteously, 


And speaketh things that are 


10. In the desperate state of Jewish 
affairs Jehovah suddenly interposes, 
and miraculously delivers his people. 
The repetition of THY, xow, is peculiarly 
emphatic. 

11. The images here employed 
strikingly set forth the vain attempt 
of the Assyrians to reduce Jerusalem. 
Toexpress the formationand execution 
of plans, the Hebrews use metaphori- 
cally the terms employed to denote 
natural conception and birth; and, to 
convey an idea of the utter inutility 
of any scheme, it is compared to 
chaff, stubble, wind, ἕο. Comp. Ps. 
vii. 14; Isa. xxvi. 18, lix. 4. 0, 
breath, is here used for anger, or rage, 
as Judges viii. 3; Isa. xxv.4. Lowth’s 
alteration of My D274 into Wx 2-1, 
after the conjecture of Secker, is un- 
warranted. ‘The meaning is, that the 
rage of the Assyrians against Jehovah 
and his people would prove the cause 
of their own destruction. 

12. The \is continuative. By ony 
are meant people from the different 
nations serving in the Assyrian army. 
mipywn, Jurnings, is put in the plural to 
indicate intensity. Comp. Amos. ii. 
1; and, for the last clause of the verse, 
2 Sam. xxiii. 6, 7. 

13. The miraculous overthrow of 
the army of Sennacherib was so 


right ; 


co) 


illustrious a display of the Divine 
omnipotence and care, that it claimed 
the attention both of Gentiles and 
Jews. They are, therefore, summoned 
to give earnest heed to it. 

14. Having called upon the Jews to 
consider the awful manifestation of 
the character of Jehovah, which they 
had witnessed in the destruction of 
his enemies, the prophet now de- 
scribes the alarm which it produced 
in the wicked inhabitants of Jeru- 
salera. The concluding words of the 
verse have no meaning, except there 
be an implied reference to eternal 
punishment. Of that punishment the 
impious Jews had a striking emblem 
before their eyes, in the fires of Tophet, 
in which the dead bodies of the As- 
syrians were being burned. See chap. 
xxx. 33, and the passages there quoted. 
1 is here used emphatically, as 07? is, 
Amos. ix. 1. 

15, 16. These verses contain a beau- 
tiful description of the character, 
security, and happiness, of the right- 
eous, contrasted with the miserable 
condition of the ungodly. Comp. Ps. 
xy. and xxiv. nipi and o9 are used 
adverbially. The participles 723, ΘῸΝ, 
and ody, strongly express the repug- 
nance felt to the evils specified. 
Before Θ᾿, subaud. πεν, The righteous 


284 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XXXIII. 


That despiseth the gain of oppression ; 
That shaketh his hands, that he may not take a bribe ; 
That stoppeth his ears, that he may not listen to bloodshed ; 


And shutteth his eyes, that he 
16 


may not behold injury : 


He it is that shall dwell on high ; 


The strongholds of rocks shall be his refuge ; 


His bread shall be given him ; 

His water shall be constant. 
17 

They shall see distant lands. 
18 


Thine eyes shall contemplate the King in his beauty: 


Thine heart shall reflect on the terror : 


Where is the secretary ? where the collector ? 
Where he that numbered the towers ? 


cannot listen to any scheme or counsel 
which has murder for its object. 897, 
at the beginning of ver.16,is emphatic: 
He it is who, &. D282 0% signifies 
permanent, i.e. perennial fountains or 
streams, Jer. xv. 18;—a figure quite 
natural to an Oriental poet, and 
powerfully calculated to impress the 
mind. Comp. Ps. xxiii. 

17. Interpreters are greatly divided 
on the subject of the king to whom 
reference is here made. Déderlein 
advocates the preposterous opinion 
that Sennacherib is meant. Piscator, 
Vatablus, Clarius, Clericus, Jackson, 
Hensler, v. d. Palm, Gesenius, Hitzig, 
Scholz, and Hendewerk, maintain that 
the prophet has Hezekiah in his eye. 
This interpretation is also admitted 
by Calvin, and that class of commen- 
tators, who, with him, explain the 
passage first literally of Hezekiah, and 
then typically of Christ. On compar- 
ing, however, ver. 22, chap. vi. 5; Ps. 
xlviii. 2, there is reason to believe that 
Jehovah himself is intended. Thus 
the Targ. S29 72) NPIS WM, the glory 
of the presence of the King of the worlds ; 
meaning the sensible symbol of the 
Divine presence vouchsafed in the 
temple. The vision of this glory was 
an object of intense desire on the part 
of the pious Israelites, Ps. xxvil. 4, 
lxili. 2; Isa, xxxviii. 11, This inter- 
pretation has the suffrages of Vitringa, 
Michaelis, Koppe, and Cube. The 
Jews who had been cut off from access 


to Jerusalem by the Assyrian army, 
should again enjoy the privilege of 
worshipping in the temple, and be- 
holding the glory of the Lord. fy 78 
opmye, lit. the land of distances, i.e. 
distant countries. Instead of being 
cooped up within the walls of Jerusa- 
lem by the Assyrians, the inhabitants 
should not only freely traverse their 
own land, but visit distant nations. 
Comp. Jer. viii. 19, where the same 
phrase occurs ; and in the same sense, 
without yx, Zech. x. 9. 

18. The meaning is not, as the 
rendering of our common version 
would import, that the minds of the 
inhabitants would be filled with terror 
in reference to anticipated evils, but 
that the state of terror into which 
they had been brought by the foreign 
army should now only be matter of 
reflection. The questions which follow 
shew that the reflection would be 
joyous and exulting. As usual, the 
interrogatives imply the strongest 
negation. By 125 is here meant the 
secretary or scribes of Sennacherib, 
who took the census of the people, 
and imposed upon them the tribute. 
This clearly appears from its close 
connexion with the following 7, 
the weigher, i.e. the collector or tax- 
gatherer, who, on receiving the money, 
weighed it to ascertain its amount. 
DyAWTnY Ww designates the engineer 
officer who reconnoitred the fortifica- 
tions, to determine on the most eligible 


CHAP. XXXIII.| 


ISATAH. 


285 


19 The fierce people thou shalt see no more ; 
The people of unintelligible language, 
Of a barbarous, unmeaning tongue. 


20 


Contemplate Zion, the city of our festivals ; 


Let thine eyes look on Jerusalem, a tranquil abode— 
A tent that shall not be removed : 
Its stakes shall never be pulled up, 
Nor shall any of its cords be broken. 

21 But there the glorious Jehovah shall be to us 
Instead of rivers and wide-spreading streams ; 


No oared galley shall enter it, 


Nor shall any magnificent vessel pass through to it. 


For Jehovah is our Judge ; 
Jehovah is our Lawgiver ; 
Jehovah is our King ; 


22 


points of attack. The words of Paul, 
1 Cor. i. 20, ποῦ σοφός ; ποῦ γραμμα- 
Tevs ; ποῦ συζητητὴς, K.T.A., are not, 
as some have imagined, a quotation 
of the words of this verse; the only 
points of agreement between them 
being merely the occurrence of ypap- 
parevs, and the repetition of the in- 
terrogative ποῦ. It is not impossible, 
however, that the structure of the 
one passage may have suggested the 
other. 

19. wi) is the regular Niphal Parti- 
ciple of 1, which occurs only in this 
place, but is obviously equivalent in 
signification to WY, to be strong, fierce, 

y 

cruel. Targ. Win. Syr. eas. Vulg. 
impudentem. Symm. ἀναιδὴς. Comp. 
mw, Dan. vii. 23. For mw ‘poy, 
comp. Ezek. 111. 5, 6; and for ji 2973, 
Isa, xxvill..11. That the Assyrians 
are meant cannot be doubted. Their 
language, or rather that of their 
Medo-Persian mercenaries, not being 
understood by the Jews, is represented 
as in itself unintelligible. 

20. Instead of Ivin, upwards of 
sixty MSS. and the earliest editions 
read 31ND, WE, a ἅπαξ Ney. Comp. 


the Arab. ye migravit, iter fecit. 


Almost all the terms here employed 
are borrowed from the nomadic life ; 


and the whole strongly describes the 
permanence and tranquillity of the 
Jewish state. mz25, however, is not to 
be taken in an absolutely unlimited 
sense, but is to be understood as ap- 
plicable to the old dispensation. ἡ 

21. ΟἸΡῸ is used adverbially. See 
Hitzig on Hos. ii. 1. In 3 OW OI 
or there is evident allusion to the 
situation of Nineveh and the royal 
cities of Egypt. What the Tigris and 
its canals were to the former, and 
those of the Nile to the latter, Jehovah 
would be to Jerusalem, which had no 
such streams for her defence. Comp. 
Nah. iii. 8 ; and as parallel in meaning, 
chap. xxvi.1. The suffixes in ia and 
ay refer to Jerusalem, as expressed 
in DW, the adverb of place. Of the 
two kinds of vessels here mentioned, 
one was propelled by oars; and the 
other had sails: hence the use of Ὑπὸ, 
splendid, magnificent. 'The former were 
employed as war-galleys for conveying 
troops, and making an attack; the 
latter were vessels of burden for the 
transportation of stores, &e. Comp. 
Ezek. xxvii. 27, xxx. 9. 

22. This beautiful triplet expresses 
the confidence of the church in the 
government and protection of Jehovah. 
The Divine name is placed first for 
the sake of emphasis. 7 also is 
emphatic. ; 


NN 


286 


He it is that will save us. 


23 Thy ropes hang loose ; 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XXXIV. 


The men could not make firm the socket of the mast ; 


They could not spread the sail. 


Then the booty of much spoil was divided ; 
Even the lame seized upon the prey. 


24 


Neither shall any inhabitant say: I am sick; 


The people that dwell therein have their iniquity forgiven. 


23. The prophet, reverting to the 
subject he had introduced, ver. 21, by 
a sudden apostrophe addresses the 
Assyrian army under the image of a 
fleet. Instead of being properly rigged 
and prepared for action, it should be 
totally dismantled and unfit for ser- 
vice :—the effect of the storm of 
Divine wrath with which it should be 
visited. The 3 was the cross-beam 
in which the mast was fixed, so as to 
make it steady: called by the Greeks, 
μεσόδμη, ἱστοπέδα, and ἱστοδόκη. Be- 
cause 0D) occurs, chap. xxx. 17, in the 
sense of flag, Hitzig would so render 
it here ; but the subject is altogether 


different, and 18, to spread, could only 
with propriety be used of sai/s. τὰ, 
then, is emphatic, and marks the exact 
point of time when the inhabitants 
of Jerusalem should seize upon the 
Assyrian spoils. The introduction of 
the lame as going forth to possess 
themselves of the booty is exquisite 
in effect. 

24. The Jews should now enjoy a 
period of prosperity and comfort,— 
the result of the forgiveness of their 
sins. For the connexion between 
pardon and convalescence, comp. Ps. 
clll. 3; Matt. viii. 17. 


CHAPTER XXXIV. 


There only remained one other hostile nation against which it was necessary 
to pronounce the Divine sentence ; »iz. Edom: the ancient and inveterate 


enemy of the Jews. 


This sentence is here delivered as part of a general 


denunciation against the enemies of the church of God. The chapter begins 
with a universal summons to the nations to attend to what the prophet was 


about to deliver, 1. 


Then follows a prediction of the calamities which 


Nebuchadnezzar would bring upon all the nations round Judza, 2—4; 
especially upon Idumea, which, with its capital, should be rendered a per- 
petual desolation, 5—15. Finally; those who should live in after times are 
called to compare the prophecy, as recorded in the inspired volume, with 
the event, in order to convince themselves of its Divine origin, and most 
minute fulfilment, 16,17. The entire piece is a strongly coloured, magnifi- 
cent, and sublime specimen of the prophetic style. See Lowth in Joc. and 


Lect. xx. 


CHAP. ΧΧΧΙΥ.] 


ISATAH. 


287 


1 Draw near, ye nations, to hear ; 


Ye people, attend : 


Let the earth and her fulness hear ; 
The globe, and all its productions. 
2 For the indignation of Jehovah is upon all the nations, 
And his fury upon all their armies: 
He hath devoted them to destruction ; 
He hath delivered them over to slaughter. 
3 Their slain also shall be cast out ; 
Yea, the stench of their carcases shall ascend ; 
And the mountains shall flow down with their blood. 
4 All the host of heaven shall also melt, 
And the heavens shall be rolled up like a scroll ; 


Yea, all their host shall fall, 


As the leaf falleth from the vine, 
And as the withered leaf from the fig tree. 
5 For my sword shall be made drunk in the heavens ; 


1. Though Oxexy is used in several 
instances metaphorically of children, 


(comp. the Arab. use? stirps, and 


the Eth, RARA, fetus, embryo,) 


yet it seems here to be employed 
literally to denote the various pro- 
ductions which spring out of the 
earth. Whatever exists on the face 
of the globe is summoned to witness 
the execution of the Divine wrath. 
Comp. for similar instances of proso- 
poperia, Ps. 1. 4; Isa. 1.1; Ezek. vi. 
3; Micah vi. 1, 2. 

2. For the peculiar force of O77, 
see chap. xi. 15. 

3,4. The language of these verses 
is in the highest degree hyperbolical 
All nature is represented as involved 
in the predicted catastrophe, and sink- 
ing into ruin. The atmosphere should 
be infected with the effluvia rising 
from the bodies of the slain ; and the 
quantity of blood should be such as 
to wash away the very mountains 
from their localities. Not even the 
celestial bodies should escape, but 
should roll together like a piece of 
parchment when set on fire. Comp. 
Matt. xxiv. 29; 2 Pet. iii, 10, 12; 


Rev. vi. 12—14; Isa. xiii. 10. In pro- 
phetic style mountains denote reli- 
gious establishments, and the heavens 
the sphere of political governments ; 
so that the violent and entire removal 
of these in the countries around 
Judea is here predicted. 

5. Now commences the specific 
sentence against the Idumzans, with 
which are to be compared chap. 
Ixiii. 1—6, and Jer. xlix. 7—22. The 
language of the latter prophecy is so 
explicit, and the description accords 
so completely with that more figura- 
tively expressed in the two parallel 
passages of Isaiah, that we are com- 
pelled to refer them all to the same 
event—the desolating conquests of 
Nebuchadnezzar. The IDUMANS, or 
Epomites, 078722; LXX. ᾿Ιδουμαῖοι ; 
were the descendants of Esau, or 
Edom, Gen. xxv. 25, 30 ; and inhabited 
the mountainous country of Seir, 


Arab. δ] psi) , which stretched from the 


Dead Sea, and the south-eastern boun- 
dary of Palestine to the Elanitic gulf. 
They were first governed by dukes or 
petty chiefs, and afterwards by kings, 
Gen. xxxvi. They maintained their 
independence till the time of David, 


288 


ἸΒΑΙΛΗ. 


[CHAP. XXXIV. 


Behold, upon Edom it shall descend, 
Even for judgment upon the people whom I have devoted. 
6 The sword of Jehovah is full of blood ; 


It is besmeared with fat ; 


by whom they were subdued, and con- 
tinued vassals to the Jews till the 
reign of Jehoram, when they rebelled; 
and, though checked by the decisive 
victory gained over them by Amaziah, 
they soon recovered themselves, to the 
great annoyance of the Jewish state. 
- Their enmity was also manifested 
during and after the exile, having in- 
vaded the land of Judzea, and exercised 
wanton cruelties on such of the inha- 
bitants as had remained. They were, 
however, severely chastised by Judas 
Maccabeus, who slew twenty thousand 
of them; and were at last conquered 
by John Hyrcanus, and compelled to 
conform to the religion of the Jews ; 
they afterwards suffered jointly with 
the latter from the Roman arms, and 
ultimately became extinct, or amalga- 
mated with the Arabs of the desert. No 
sooner were the Israelites brought 
into contact with them, on their pas- 
sage from Egypt, than they expe- 
rienced their hostility, Numb. xx. 17, 
18; and all along, their hostile dispo- 
sition manifested itself whenever there 
was a fit occasion, either in the way 
of predatory invasion, or of offensive 
alliance with other enemies of the 
Jews. Hence the denunciations against 
them, Ps. cxxxvii. 7; Obad. 10—14; 
Jer. xlix. 7—22; Lam. iv. 21, 22; 
Ezek. xxv. 12—14, xxxii. 29, xxxv.; 
Amos i. 11, 12; and in the present 
chapter. 

The immediate connexion of all 
these prophecies, and the similarity 
of the language employed in most of 
them, prove that it is the literal Edom 
which Isaiah has in view. The notion 
of a mystical people or community, as 
some have imagined, is utterly unten- 
able; resting primarily on the blas- 
phemous interpretation of the Jewish 
Rabbins, who, by transposing the let- 
ters of the name Jesus, have converted 
it into Esau, and then applied it to 
the Saviour; and Edom, to which 
it poetically corresponds, to the Chris- 
tians, and especially to Rome—the 


centre of Christendom, at the time 
they wrote. See Buxtorf’s Lex. Chald. 
Talmud. et Rabbin. svb voc. 07x. To 
the literal interpretation, the sublime 
and awful character of the language 
cannot justly be objected, since it 
was merely adequate to meet the ex- 
pectations of a patriotic Jew in refer- 
ence to the infliction of Divine judg- 
ment on those who had been the 
ancient and most inveterate enemies 
of his country. 

mis here taken in the Aram. ac- 
ceptation, ¢o be filled with liquor, inebri- 
ated, LUXX. ἐμεθύσθη ; the sword being 
poetically represented as eagerly drink- 
ing the blood which it was the instru- 
ment of shedding. The preterite is 
subordinated to the following future, 
and must be rendered accordingly. 
By ond is meant the Idumezan 
“heaven,” or the ruling power in 
Edom, as in ver.4. Yet the judgment 
was not to be confined to the rulers ; it 
was likewise to extend to the inhabit- 
ants generally. 217 DY, lit. the people 
of my devotion, i. 6. those whom I have 

evoted to destruction. 

6. The idea introduced in the pre- 
ceding verse is illustrated in this by 
language borrowed from the slaughter 
of sacrificial victims—a figure which 
the prophets frequently employ when 
setting forth the destruction of a 
people by war. See Jer. xlvi. 10, 1. 27, 
li. 40; Ezek. xxxix. 17—20; and 
comp. Rev. xix. 17.—72577 stands for 
mang, the Hothpaal conjugation, of 
which a few other examples occur, as 
ὌΞΞΙΤ, Lev. xii, 55, 56; xaun, Deut. 
xxiv. 4. 

mz3, BozRau, is considered by Ge- 
senius to be the Béorpa of the Greek, 
and the Bostra Arabia of the Roman 
writers, which the Arabs still call by 


the name of wa), and which lies 
in the Hauran, to the N.E. of the 
mountains of Gilead. There is no 
proof, however, that this city ever 
belonged to the Idumeans ; nor 15 


CHAP. XXXIV.| 


ISAIAH. 


289 


The blood of lambs and of goats, 
The fat of the kidneys of rams. 
For Jehovah hath a sacrifice in Bozrah, 
And a great slaughter in the land of Edom. 
7 With them also shall the unicorns come down, 
And the bullocks with the bulls ; 


there the smallest probability that 
they would have a capital at the dis- 
tance of a hundred miles from their 
territory, with the powerful states of 
Moab and Ammon intervening. In 
all probability, the city of which the 
prophet speaks occupied the site of 


the present 8 yha?s Besseyra, a village 


which Burckhardt found in the moun- 
tainous country of Djebal, sixteen 
hours to the south of Kerek, and 
which, judging from the surrounding 
ruins, he considers to have been an- 
ciently a considerable city. It lies on 
an elevation, at the summit of which 
is a castle, built of stone, with strong 
walls. What confirms this view of 
its position is the mention made of 
it in immediate connexion with }21, 
Teman, Amos i. 12, a city and region 
to the east of Idumea. Burckhardt 
takes it to have been the Psora of Pa- 
lestina Tertia ; but this Dr. Robinson 
disputes. From the circumstance that 
Bozrah is mentioned, Jer. xlviil. 24, as 
belonging to Moab, some have thought 
that it was at one time in the posses- 
sion of that people, and that it had 
been taken from them by the Idu- 
means. This is not impossible ; but, 
as it again occurs, chap. xlix. 13, as 
the capital of Edom, we are doubtless 
to regard that occurring in the former 
passage, as a place of the same name 
in Moab. Indeed, as the word signi- 
fies a fortified or inaccessible place, it 
appears to have designated several 
cities. Comp. however, with a special 
view to the present case, Ps. Ix. 9, 
(Heb. 11). That the Bozrah of Isaiah 
originally pertained to Edom, we 
gather from Gen. xxxvi. 33. 

7. The opinion of Jerome, Pagninus, 
Forerius, Bruce, &c. that by 0x9, or 0, 
the rhinoceros is meant, is now ex- 
ploded ; as is, for the most part, that 
of Bochart, that the Hebrew word cor- 


responds in signification, as it does in 
form, to the Arab. “Ὁ yy Ti, & Species 


of antelope or gazelle. Schultens, 
Gesenius, De Wette, Winer, Hitzig, 
and others, contend that the bos buba- 
lus, or wild buffalo, is the animal in- 
tended : treating the idea of the uni- 
corn as altogether fabulous. Still, 
however, there are testimonies from 
independent witnesses to the existence 
of such an animal both in Asia and 
Africa, which should make us pause 
before we reject this ancient interpre- 
tation. Not only is the figure of the 
unicorn exhibited on the ruins of 
Persepolis, but it is described by 
Pliny in his Nat. Hist. viii. 21; by 
Ludovico de Bartema, who saw two 
at Mecca ; by several Portuguese, and 
by Father Lobo, who saw them in 
Abyssinia; by the Hottentots in South 
Africa; by the natives of Thibet, 
where it is called 2502; by Mr. 
Hodgson, the British resident at Ne- 
paul, who states that it is a native of 
southern Thibet ; and by Bishop Bru- 
guéres, who is at the head of the 
Catholic mission in Siam. See Robin- 
son’s Calmet; Winer’s Realworterb. 
art. “EKinhorn;” and the Times for 
Oct. 29, 1832. The animal is described 
as bearing some resemblance to a 
horse, has cloven hoofs, a tail shaped 
like that of a boar, and the horn 
grows out of the forehead. One of 
these horns, obtained by Major Latter, 
from the Sachia Lama of Thibet, was 
twenty inches in length, four inches 
and a half at the root, tapering to- 
wards the point, and nearly straight. 
According to Bp. Bruguéres, its head 
is larger than that of an ox, and 
the horn rises from its forehead and 
points upwards ; it is endowed with 
remarkable speed, and bounds like our 
deer. It seems unaccountable that the 
different Greek translators of the Pen- 


290 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP, XXXIV. 


Yea, their land shall be drenched with blood, 
And their soil overspread with fat. 
8 For Jehovah hath a day of vengeance, 
A year of recompense in vindication of Zion. 
9 Her streams also shall be turned into pitch, 


And her dust into brimstone ; 


And her land shall become burning pitch. 


It shall not be quenched by night or by day ; 


Her smoke shall ascend for ever ; 
From generation to generation it shall lie waste ; 
None shall pass through it to all perpetuity. 


11 


But the pelican and the porcupine shall possess it ; 


The crane also and the crow shall inhabit it ; 


tateuch, Job, and the Psalms, the 
result of whose labour we have in 
the LXX., should have concurred in 
rendering the term by povoképas, 1. 6. 
unicorn, if the existence of some such 
animal had not been familiar to them. 
In all the passages in which it occurs 
it is thus rendered, except in the pre- 
sent instance, in which it is translated 
οἱ ἁδροὶ, the strong ones. In those pas- 


2 ον 
sages the Syr. has [Saa3, which is 


given, Deut. xiv. 5, as the transla- 
tion of 10", a species of antelope ; 


and the Arab. has variously rp 
gazelle, wo eS, rhinoceros, Des ac- 


cording to Damir, ἃ species of 


steph pia the wild ow, and wy 
soldi) or wy Ms; Unicori. 


The Ethiopic has likewise HAdh@., 
PC, the one horned, in the three 


passages in which it is thus rendered 
in the Arabic. It is obvious no stress 
is to be laid on the circumstance that 
in Deut. xxxiii. 17, horns are ascribed 
to the 08), since the word is there 
used as a noun of multitude, the 
horns not signifying, as some have 
supposed, Ephraim and Manasseh : 
but as Moses immediately explains, 
“ They are the ten thousands of Ephraim, 


and they are the thousands of Manas- 
seh.” According to the Scripture re- 
presentations, the D981 were strong 
and fierce, and were therefore appro- 
priately used in a figurative sense to 
denote powerful and formidable ene- 
mies, especially those of elevated rank, 
such as princes or rulers. ΤΥ is here 
used in a sense equivalent to 52, to 
fall, come down involuntarily ; ined 
συμπεσοῦνται. 

8. By ΡῈ 2, the cause of Zion, is 
meant the contention, or, to use a 
legal term, the suit carried on between 
the Idumezans and the Jews, to the 
great annoyance of the latter, which 
Jehovah would now terminate by tak- 
ing vengeance on the former. Comp. 
Obad. 10—15. 

9, 10. Comp. Jer. xlix. 18, where 
also the destruction of Edom is com- 
pared to that of Sodom and Gomor- 
rah; but it is much more forcibly 
exhibited by the bold and striking 
figures here employed by. Isaiah. This 
destruction was to be complete and 
perpetual. Comp. Jude 7, and Rev. 
xiv. 10, 11. 

11. This and the following verses 
contain an accumulation of objects 
usually associated with desolate re- 
gions, in order still more to heighten 
the effect of the prophetic picture. 
The os7, Kaath, Chal. sm, Katha, 
Burckhardt describes as abounding in 
such numbers in Shera, that “the 
Arab boys kill two or three of them 


CHAP. XXXIV. | 


ISATAH. 


291 


For he will stretch over it the line of desolation, 
And the plummet of emptiness. 


12 
rule ; 


As for her nobles—none is there whom they might call to the 


And none of her princes exist any more. 


13 


Thorns also shall spring up in her palaces ; 


Nettles and thistles in her fortresses : 
And she shall be a habitation for wolves ; 


A dwelling-place for ostriches. 
The wild cats shall meet the jackals ; 


14 


And the shaggy he-goat shall call to his fellow ; 


There also the lilith shall rest, 


And find for herself a place of repose. 


at a time, merely by throwing a stick 
among them.” LXX. (Lev. xi. 18; 
&c.) Πελεκὰν ; Vulg. Pelican. The name 
is derived from 8p, fo vomit ; this bird 
being remarkable for vomiting back the 
shells which it has swallowed. In Ps. 
ΟἿ]. 7, it is called 1272 Np, the pelican of 
the desert, from its frequenting places 
remote from the habitations of man. 
For tp, see on chap. xiv. 23. The 
FON, FON, heron or crane, is likewise a 
water-fowl, found in marshy deserts. 
LXX. ἴβεις, the Egyptian /d7s or heron. 
In the concluding words of the verse, 
reference is made to the 1731375 state 
of the earth, before it was shaped into 
order and beauty, Gen. i. 2,—a state 
of complete desolation and emptiness, 
than which no comparison could be 
more apt. See Jer.iv.23. Tosucha 
condition was Idumeza to be reduced ; 
and all who have attempted to pene- 
trate it, describe such to be its con- 
dition at the present day. The line 
and plummet were used not only when 
buildings were being erected, but also 
when they were to be taken down. In 
792) the Vis causal, and the nominative 
is Jehovah, understood. 

12. Lowth’s emendation here is 
most unhappy,—TW, her princes, in 
the following member of the parallel- 
ism, obviously corresponding to 777, 
her nobles. The same may be said of 
Dpx and |X. 1 in PS) is pleonastic after 
the Nom. absolute. Before 139 is an 
ellipsis of > 7¢x, which is not uncom- 


mon. From the statement here made 
it would appear that the Idumean 
monarchy was elective. 

13. Before 732.8 is an ellipsis of 3. 
For 0:5, see on chap. xili. 22. 

14. Observe the paronomasia in DZ 
and ox, and see for the signification 
of both words, and of yw, chap. xiii. 
21, 29. τὴ, a ἅπαξ dey—Bochart, 
Gesenius, Rosenm., Hitzig, and others, 
imagine it to be a night-spectre, such 
as the Rabbins describe, and the 


same as the ων of the Arabs, the 


{dus of the Syrians, and the 


ἔμπουσα of the Greeks ; but employed 
as it is by the prophet in a catalogue 
of real animals, there can be no doubt 
that some animal is meant, though 
it may now be impossible to decide 
which. It is not, however, unlikely 
that the m>, lilith, may be the same 


as the Arab. ων, lailon, which the 


Kamoos explains; tarda avis, ejusve 
pullus. Freytag’s Arab. Lex. Of this 
interpretation, Déderlein approves, 
and adds: “otidem veterum, avem 
sordidam, fetore horrendam, solitu- 
dinis amicam ;” referring to Shaw’s 
Travels for a fuller description. Dathe 
has: “tarda avis 5. lamia.” LXX. 
ὀνοκένταυροι. Aq. λίλιθ. Vulg. lamia. 
Most moderns, the screech-owl, as in 
our common version. In the present 
state of uncertainty, I have deemed it 


292 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XXXIV. 


15 There the arrow-snake shall nestle and lay eggs ; 
And hatch them, and cover the young with her shadow 
There also the vultures shall be gathered together, 


Each one with her mate. 
16 
Not one of these shall fail ; 


Search out from the book of Jehovah, and read : 


No female shall want her mate ; 
For the Divine mouth hath commanded, 
And His Spirit hath gathered them. 


17 


He hath also cast the lot for them, 


And His hand hath divided it for them with the line; 


They shall possess it for ever ; 


best, with Aquila, Van der Palm, and 
De Wette, to retain the original word. 


15. ep, Arab. Blas , the arrow-snake, 
from ye , saliit, insiliit ; the serpent 


known among the Greeks by the name 
of ἀκοντίας, and the anguis jaculus of 
Lin. It abounds in Arabia, and 
springs suddenly, and with great 
violence, on its prey. Its wound is 
deadly. See Boch. lib. iii. cap. 9. 
Four MSS. read 1557, and other five 
have done so originally. It is also 
the reading of the Soncin. Edit., but is 
otherwise unsupported. 72 properly 
signifies fo slip away, or make one’s 
escape: it is here used in Piel to 
denote the slipping of the eggs out of 
the body of the serpent ; only it is 
taken causatively as the act of the 


serpent. Comp. the Arab. lal, fetus. 


Serpents lay their eggs with much 
apparent pain, and leave them to be 
hatched in the sun; but when the 
young appear, they carefully protect 
them. This protection is expressed 
by 123, which signifies ¢o collect, heap 
together, and so to sit upon or brood. 
16. The prophet here calls upon all 
who should live after the devastation 
of Idumeea, to compare the event with 
the predictions respecting it which he 
had just delivered. These predictions 
would be found in the sacred volume, 
emphatically called i 790, the book of 
Jehovah, because written by inspiration 
of his Spirit, and bearing the stamp 


of his authority. The foundation of 
its contents had been laid by Moses ; 
and they were augmented from time 
to time by succeeding prophets, till 
the canon was complete. Isaiah knew 
that his prophecies would form part 
of the volume, and he, therefore, con- 
fidently makes his appeal to it. With 
THD YD WH, comp. epevvare τὰς γραφάς, 
John v. 39.—7:7, these, Vitringa refers 
to the predictions: it rather belongs 
to the different animals just enu- 
merated : they should all, without fail, 
be found inhabiting the land of Edom. 
ΔΤ is the pronoun used emphatically 
for 7, and may therefore admit of 2 
in the construct state. Comp. Deut. 
Xxxii. 39, and similar passages in which 
sii is thus used as equivalent to 77. 


> is similarly used in Arabic. A few 


codices have 178, contrary to usage ; 
some have 737 Ἔ, which is the reading 
of the LXX. and Arab.; but both 
evidently emendations. 

17. Both genders are here used, 
doubtless because the animals men- 
tioned are of different genders. 

That the prophecy contained in this 
chapter has been minutely fulfilled, 
must be admitted by all who are 
acquainted with the present desolate 
condition of Idumeza. Volney, in 
spite of his infidel prejudices, was 
compelled to bear testimony to the 
facts of the case. “There are,” he 
says, “to the S.E. of the Dead Sea, 
within three days’ journey, upwards of 
eighty ruined towns absolutely desolated ; 


CHAP. ΧΧΧΥ.] 


ISATAH. 29 


ὧν 


To successive generations they shall dwell therein. 


several with large edifices. The Arabs 
sometimes use them as folds for their 
cattle ; but in general they avoid 


them, on account of the enormous scor- 
pions with which they swarm.” See 
Keith on the Prophecies. 


CHAPTER XXXV. 


This chapter is intimately connected with the preceding. ‘The enemies of the 


Jews having been all overthrown in the judgments brought upon them by 
Jehovah, Judea, which they had laid waste, should again flourish, 1, 2; the 
timid and weak should be encouraged to trust in God for deliverance, 3, 4 ; 
every obstacle should be removed which tended to obstruct the restoration 
of the Jews to their own land, and every advantage afforded them by which 
their speedy and safe return might be promoted, 5—9; so that the sorrows 
which had preyed upon them for so long a period should give place to 
exquisite and permanent joy, 10. The attempts that have been made to 
explain this prophecy of gospel-times, and, in part, of heaven itself, are 
exceedingly loose and unsatisfactory. The explanation given by both the 
Lowths is of this character. As the language of part of the 6th verse and 
that of the 7th is obviously figurative, it is quite a violation of hermeneu- 
tical propriety to interpret the 5th, and the former part of the 6th, literally 
of the miracles performed by our Saviour. Nor is there any proof what- 
ever that Christ refers John the Baptist to this passage, Matt. xi.5. He 
employs none of the formulas which he uniformly uses when directing the 
attention of his hearers to passages in the O. T. (see Matt. xi. 10, xii. 17, xiii. 
14), but simply appeals to his miracles in proof of his Messiahship. The 
language is similar, but the subjects are different. 


1 Tue desert and the parched ground shall be glad on their 
account, 
And the wilderness shall exult, and blossom as the rose. 


1. Abenezra, Kimchi, Ewald, and 
some others, consider the Ὁ in nwt» to 
be paragogic, instead of the usual 1, 
and ascribe the change to the influence 
of the following 2 in 7272. Kennicott, 
Lowth, and Hitzig, regard it as the 
mistake of some copyist, arising out 
of the next word’s beginning with the 


same letter. There is, however, no 
difficulty created by our taking it as 
the suffix, having for its antecedent 
the 0.3, zations, whose destruction had 
been predicted in the preceding chap- 
ter. For instances of similar con- 
struction, see omy, Gen. xv. 13; 
omy, Ps. xlii. 5. The waste places of 


0 0 


294 


ISATAH, 


[CHAP. XXXV. 


2 It shall blossom abundantly, and rejoice, 
Even with exultation and shouting: 
The glory of Lebanon shall be given to it ; 
The splendour of Carmel and Sharon ; 
They shall see the glory of Jehovah, 


The splendour of our God. 


3 Strengthen ye the weak hands, 


And confirm the feeble knees. 


4 Say to the faint-hearted: Be strong; fear not ; 


Behold your God !— 


Vengeance cometh, the retribution of God,— 


He will come and save you. 


Cr 


Then shall the eyes of the blind be opened, 


And the ears of the deaf unstopped. 
6 Then shall the lame leap like the hart, 
And the tongue of the dumb shall sing ; 


Judea personified, exult on account of 
the overthrow of those who had deso- 
lated them, and again assume their 
wonted beauty and fertility. n2v2n. 
Interpreters are not agreed as to what 
particular plant is intended by this 
word. Misled by Gesenius and others, 
Thad rendered it by crocusin my former 
edition ; but I would now retract that 
rendering, and restore the term rose as 
in our common version, since it more 
suitably expresses the idea of fragrance 
and beauty which the context so 
obviously demands. Colchicum autum- 
nale, assigned by some as the import 
of the word, whatever support it may 
seem to derive from etymology, does 
not commend itself, inasmuch as it 
denotes a poisonous bulbous-rooted 
plant, and thus conveys a repulsive 
rather than an attractive idea. The 
rose, on the contrary, is an universal 
favourite with Oriental poets, and ex- 
presses what is more pleasing to an 
English ear. The word only occurs 
once besides, Song ii. 1 ; where, in our 
common version, it is again translated 
7086. 

2. 3 73, the LXX. render, τὰ ἔρημα 
tov “Iopdavov, which Lowth, after 
Houbigant, with equal licence, trans- 
lates, “the well-watered plain of Jor- 
dan.” 3 is put for πὴ, the construct 


for the absolute, as chap. xxxiii. 6, li. 
21. For 73, eleven MSS. read 1), 
which two more have done originally, 
and one or two perhaps still do. The 
sense is the same. For the rest of 
the verse, see on chap. xxix. 17, xxxiii. 
9. What had lain barren and waste 
was now to equal the most beautiful 
and magnificent scenes of nature. 
ma denotes the inhabitants, who 
should witness the glorious display of 
the Divine character, in the deliver- 
ance of the people of God. 

3, 4. Comp. Job iv. 3, 4; Isa. xl. 
29—31; Heb. xii. 12, 13.~2>>-7M93, the 
hasty, quick of heart, i. e. those whose 
heart palpitates quickly through fear. 
The attention of the church is directed 
to the approaching interposition of 
Jehovah,—the efiect of which would 
be a vindication of her wrongs, by in- 
flicting a just retribution upon her 
enemies. 

5, 6. So conspicuous and overpower- 
ing would be the interference of God 
on behalf of his people, that those of 
the most obtuse intellect could not 
fail to perceive it. So joyous would 
be the event, that persons the most 
unlikely would participate in the ex- 
ultation. No image could more beau- 
tifully depict the sudden change of 
circumstances from adversity to pros- 


CHAP. ΧΧΧΥ.] 


ISATAH. 295 


For water shall break forth in the wilderness, 


And streams in the desert. 


7 Yea, the vapoury illusion shall become a lake, 
And the thirsty soil springs of water ; 
Tn the haunts of wolves, where they rest, 
Shall be a place for reeds and rushes. 

8 A raised road also shall be there, and a way, 
And it shall be called, the Holy Way ; 
The unclean shall not pass along it, 


perity, than the bursting forth of a 
plentiful stream in the midst of an 
arid sandy desert: nor could any 
more powerfully affect the mind of 
an Oriental, whose climate differs so 
much from ours. Comp. chap. xli. 18, 
xiii. 19, 20, xliv. 3, 4. 

7. Still more to enhance the idea of 
the joyful experience of the Divine 
goodness, the prophet introduces the 


193, Sharab, Arab. -»» Serab,—an 


illusion to which the French have 
given the name of mirage, consisting 
in the presentation to the view of a 
lake or sea in the midst of a plain, 
where none in reality exists. It is 
produced by the refraction of the rays 
of light, during the exhalation of 
vapours, by the excessive heat of the 
sun; and frequently exhibits, along 
with the undulating appearance of 
water, the shadows of objects within 
or around the plain, both in a natural 
and inverted position. The deception 
is most complete ; and to the weary 
traveller, who is attracted by it, in 
the highest degree mortifying ; since, 
instead of reaching refreshing water, 
he finds himself in the midst of 
nothing but glowing sand. It is often 
used proverbially, or for the sake of 
comparison, by the Arabs, as in the 


Koran, Sur. xxiv. 39. |.,γ δ els 
Luts sda οἱ sl> fol ole “Le, “But 
as for those who believe not, their 
works are like the Serad of the plain: 


the thirsty imagines it is water, 
but when he reaches it, he finds it is 


nothing.” See more instances quoted 
in Gesen. The meaning of Isaiah is, 
that the expectations of the Jews 
should not be disappointed. What 
they might apprehend would only 
prove a delusion, they should ex- 
perience to be a reality. The most 
abundant provision would be made 
for their comfort. The same idea 
is conveyed in the latter part of 
the verse. The haunts or dvwell- 
ing-places of the wolves are natu- 
rally dry. 228, ὦ collection of water, 


lake, &e. le lel. Compare the 


Arabic version of Ps. exiv. 8. For the 
meaning of 02m, see on chap. xiii, 22. 
in AZM is added on the principle of 
the pluralis inhumanus, referring, though 
a fem. sing., to the mas. plur., 02", 
See Gesen. Lehrg. p. 719. 72, with- 
out the Mappik, is found in twenty 
MSS., two of the first printed, and 
seven other editions, but most likely 
from grammatical correction. Be- 
fore 7Z2, supply Wy, and after it, 
ow. Though vz properly signifies a 
Jenced court or habitation, yet it is here 
clearly to be taken in the acceptation 
of locality, place, &c., and seems to 
have been selected to form an anti- 
thesis to 73. 

8. JD is omitted in eighteen MSS., 
and in the LXX., Syr., and Arab., but 
its repetition does not burden the sen- 
tence. It is more likely genuine than 
otherwise. There being no proper 
roads in deserts, but, at most, a faint 
track left by the footsteps of camels, 
&c., the prediction imports that every 
facility would be secured for the re- 
turn of the exiles. Nor should any 
enjoy these facilities, or have the pri- 


290 


But it shall be for those,— 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XXXVI. 


The travellers, though foolish, shall not err. ὃ: 


9 No lion shall be there ; 


Neither shall any destructive beast ascend it ; 


Tt shall not be found there : 


But the redeemed shall walk there. 


10 


For the ransomed of Jehovah shall return, 


And come to Zion with singing ; 

And everlasting joy shall be upon their heads ; 
They shall obtain gladness and joy ; 

And sorrow and sighing shall flee away. 


vilege of returning, but such as had 
been recovered from idolatry. Comp. 
chap. Ixii. 10, 12. Idolatry is fre- 
quently spoken of as spiritual im- 
purity, Jer. ii. 23, 111. passim, xi. 13— 
17; Ezek. xxxvii. 23. 4} possesses 
peculiar emphasis. The deliverance 


that which makes God the nominative 
to 7477. Those who should avail 
themselves of the means of escape 
from Babylon and other countries, 
however defective some of them might 
be in intellectual energy, should not 
fail of reaching Zion. 

9. NV yn", one that is ravenous of 
or among beasts; a persecutor, oppres- 
sor. The redeemed should return in 
perfect safety: no enemy should be 
found to molest them. x¥an, to be 
regular, should be 83%‘, in the mas., as 


it reads in three of Kennicott’s MSS., 
and in another originally ; but it was, 
in all probability, written in the fem. 
by Isaiah,—nv7 predominating in his 
mind over y"®, at the moment he 
penned it. The other reading savours 
of correction. After 3271), supply 38, 
which one of De Rossi’s Codices reads, 
or 73, as in the LXX., Arab., and 
Syr. 

10. Comp. chap. li. 11. I must here 
adduce the words of Déderlein, with 
whose view of the subject I perfectly 
concur: “De temporibus N. T. regno 
millenario vel reditu ad ccelesta gaudia 
Esaias quidem hoc loco, si quid judico, 
ne cogitavit quidem, qui autem his de 
rebus exposuere locum nostrum, pia 
quidem varia, vera multa, sed aliena a 
mente prophets congesserunt.” Who- 
ever is familiar with the bold and 
magnificent character of the prophetic 
style will not deem the liberation 
from the captivity an event too trivial 
to be predicted in the language here 
employed. 


CHAPTER XXXVI. 


This and the three following chapters consist almost entirely of historical 
matter, relating to Sennacherib’s invasion, and other events that transpired 
towards the end of the reign of Hezekiah. With some variations, it is iden- 


CHAP. ΧΧΧΥΙ.] ISATAH. 


297 
tical with 2 Kings xviii, 13—37, xix.,and 2 Chron. xxxii.; which last chapter, 
however, contains only an abbreviated account of the transactions. It has 
been queried whether this portion of the book of Isaiah, or the correspond- 
ing portion of the Second Book of Kings, be the original ; and whether it 
was written by the prophet himself, or merely extracted by another hand 
from the annals of the Jewish kings. That Isaiah added it to the preceding 
collection of prophecies against foreign nations, with a view to shew how 
those which related to the invasion and overthrow of the Assyrians had 
been fulfilled, seems highly probable, since we find him inserting other his- 
torical narratives for a similar purpose. See chapters vii. viii. xx. xxii. 
Certain phrases and sentences, too, are precisely those which we meet with 
in his predictions, such as x}. Up, xxxvii. 23; comp. i. 4, x. 17,20. ™ 
Won, ver. 24; comp. x. 18. ΠΝ ΤΌΣ ΠΊΝΩΝ Ti nN, ver. 32; comp. ix. 7. 
Yet as these peculiarities are likewise found in the section of the Book of 
Kings, it follows that both were written by our prophet. To which add, 
the minuteness with which many of the circumstances are related, evincing 
that the writer was an eye-witness, or, at least, a contemporary, which we 
know Isaiah to have been, as well as one who was personally concerned in 
the transactions. On closely comparing, however, the two portions of the 
sacred text, it will be quite apparent that what we have in Isaiah is an 
altered copy of the text in 2 Kings, and not vice versé. It abbreviates and 
omits many things, as well as modes of expression, which occur in the lat- 
ter; aims at greater uniformity in the use and construction of words ; and 
substitutes what is easier or more appropriate for what is more difficult. 
Examples of these will be noticed in the Commentary. It would, therefore, 
appear that the prophet must have copied what he had already written in 
the Jewish annals, or in the Book of Kings, only altering it as he proceeded, 
emending some parts, omitting others, and adding some new matter, such 
as the song of Hezekiah, chap. xxxviii. 9—20. The mention of the death 
of Sennacherib as an historical fact, chap. xxxvii. 38, forms no objection to 
the authorship of Isaiah, since the latter must have reached a very advanced 
age. See Introd. Equally futile is the objection taken from the use of the 
terms 72 and m7, since there is nothing that militates against their 
having been employed by our prophet. 


1 AND it came to pass in the fourteenth year of king Hezekiah, 
that Sennacherib, king of Assyria, came up against all the 


1. The expedition of Sennacherib, 
to which reference is here made, was 
not undertaken against the Jews, but, 
as Herodotus, 11. 141, informs us, 
against Sethos, king of Egypt. This 
accounts for his immense army, (στρα- 
τὸν μέγαν, Herod.) which must have 


amounted to vastly more than 200,000, 
since nearly this number perished of 
that single division of it which had 
been sent against Jerusalem. It was 
on his march through Palestine that 
he stopped to chastise Hezekiah for 
having thrown off the Assyrian yoke, 


298 


2 fortified cities of Judah, and took them. 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP, XXXVI. 


And the king of 


Assyria sent Rabshakeh from Lachish to Jerusalem to king 
Hezekiah, with a great army; and he halted at the aqueduct of 


co 


the upper pool, in the causeway of the fuller’s field. 


And there 


went out to him Eliakim, the son of Hilkiah, who was over the 
household, and Shebna the secretary, and Joach, the son of 


4 Asaph, the annalist. 


And Rabshakeh said to them: Tell now 


Hezekiah, Thus saith the great king, the king of Assyria, What 


or 


and to subdue the fortified places 
which lay in his way, that they might 
not prove an annoyance to the rear of 
his army, or obstruct him were he 
forced to retreat. His Hebrew name, 
17720, is very accurately preserved in 
Σαναχάριβος, as given by Herodotus. 


Bohlen compares the Pers. yal, 
celebritas victorie,—a more likely deri- 
vation than ω» holy, and --» 


priest, proposed by Gesenius. His 
being styled by Herodotus: βασιλέα 
᾿Αραβίων τε Kat ᾿Ασσυρίων, may be 
accounted for, partly on the ground 
of the extended acceptation anciently 
given to the name Arabia, and partly 
from actual conquests made in Arabia 
by the Assyrian power. The fortified 
cities of Judah were built by Reho- 
boam, and were fifteen in number. 
They are specified 2 Chron. xi. 5—12. 
The meaning of the historian is, that 
these cities were all successively taken 
by Sennacherib ; not that they had 
been all actually subdued previous to 
the transactions which he was about 
to describe. 

2. MOT, Rabshakeh, prop. a name of 


Q vy 
office: Syr, 1325. D3 , the Chief But- 


ler; Opoon wo, Gen. xl. 2, 9, 90: 
Comp. D0, Radb-saris, “the chief 
eunuch,” and 221, Lab-mag, “ Chief 
of the Magi,” Jer. xxxix. 3: but it 
was not unusual, as it still is in the 
East, for persons holding high offices 
at court, to be at the same time high 
in military command. The narrative 
is here considerably abbreviated from 


confidence is this that thou exercisest? saying: I maintain (but 
it is mere talk) there is counsel and might for the war. 


On 


that in 2 Kings xviii. 13—17. Of the 
three officers there mentioned,—Tar- 
tan, Rab-saris, and Rab-shakeh, the last 
only is noticed in Isaiah, because he 
was the speaker on the occasion. 
2, Lachish, originally a royal city of 
the Canaanites, Josh. x. 3, but fortified 
by Rehoboam, 2 Chron. xi. 9. It must 
have been a place of considerable 
strength, Jer. xxxiv. 7. According to 
Eusebius, it lay seven Roman miles 
from Eleutheropolis southward, or 
about twenty-five miles west of Jeru- 
salem. For the locality here specified, 
see on chap. vii. 3. 

3. See chap. xxii. 15—25, where, as 
in the present narrative, the name of 
Shebna is spelt 822, and not 122%, as 
in 2 Kings. As 180, scride, he filled a 
different office from ‘2%, recorder, 
being employed as private secretary ; 
whereas, the latter was the historio- 
grapher, or royal annalist, whose duty 
it was to enter on the public records 
of the kingdom the more remarkable 
events that transpired. 

4, 137 7227, the Great King: a title 
assumed by oriental monarchs, partly 
from vanity, and partly to distinguish 
them from the petty kings or princes 
whom they held in vassalage. Comp. 
chap. x. 8. i) is here used as a par- 
ticle of contempt, as 1 Kings ix. 13. 

5. Instead of Max, 7 say, thirteen 
of Kennicott’s MSS., one now, and 
three in the margin, five of De Rossi’s 
originally, and the Syr., read, AyY2x, 
Thou sayest, which is the textual read- 
ing in 2 Kings. It is very possible, 
however, that ἸΌΝ is genuine,—TNX?, 
saying, being understood, as frequently, 
at the end of the preceding verse. 


CHAP. XXXVI. | 


ISATAH. 299 


whom now dost thou rely, that thon hast rebelled against me ? 
Behold! thou reliest on that broken reed-staff, Egypt, on which, 
if one lean, it will enter into his hand, and pierce it through: 
such is Pharaoh, king of Egypt, to all who rely upon him. 
But thou wilt say to me: We confide in Jehovah, our God :—is 
it not he whose high places and whose altars Hezekiah hath 
removed, and hath said to Judah and Jerusalem: Before this 
altar ye shall worship? But now, enter the lists with my 
master, the king of Assyria, and I will furnish thee with two 
thousand horses, if thou canst furnish thyself with riders to 
them. How then shouldst thou repulse one officer of the least 
of my master’s servants? Yet thou reliest upon Egypt for 


10 chariots and horsemen. 


mnawrs1, a word, or thing of lips, i.e. 
what is merely such, and has no 
foundation in reason or reality. Comp. 
on wr, a man of lips, i.e. a great 
talker, one who blusters, but means 
nothing by what he says. 

6. P22 is not properly what is 
actually broken, as no one would lean 
upon such a staff, but what is bruised, 
orreally, though not apparently injured, 
and thus incapable of yielding the 
support expected from it. There is 
possibly here a reference to the weak- 
ening of the Egyptian power, by the 
expedition sent thither by Sargon, the 
immediate predecessor of Sennacherib. 
See chap. xx. The 737, reed, was a fit 
symbol of Egypt, since it grew so 
plentifully in that country. Comp. 
for the sentiment, chap. xxx. 5, 7. 
Such language, coming from Rabsha- 
keh, was a severe reproof to the Jews, 
who were so prone to confide in Egypt. 

7. Instead of wom, the text in 2 
Kings has pv2Nn — addressing the 
people instead of Hezekiah, which 
agrees better with that monarch’s 
being immediately spoken of in the 
third person. There is no various 
reading in the MSS.; but the LXX. 
and Chald. have the plural. There is 
here a reference to the abolition of 
idolatry effected by Hezekiah, of which 
an account is given, 2 Kings xviii. 4; 
2 Chron. xxix. 16. 

8. rw, fo mix one’s self up with any 
one, meddle, enter tnto a combat. For 


But now, is it without Jehovah that I 


ex 7297, one of De Rossi’s MSS., and 
one of Kennicott’s, the Soncin. and 
Brix. Edd., and the Soncin. Prophets 
of 1486, read 77, without the article, 
which is the more usual practice. 
The text of 2 Kings reads, "Wx 77) ney. 
There are, however, several instances 
in which the article is used before a 
noun in construction. Hezekiah might 
easily have furnished two thousand 
men, but two thousand fit to act as 
horsemen might have been more 
difficult, as the training of cavalry 
was doubtless discouraged, if not 
absolutely prohibited by that pious 
king. 

9. 778, a foreign word of uncertain 
origin. Bohlen derives it from the 


Persic, Uw, proceres, magnates ; 
Ewald, from Beat curare. The per- 


son who filled this office was governor 
or prefect of a province, but inferior 
to a satrap. The name was in use 
among the Hebrews as early ‘as the 
time of Solomon, see 1 Kings x. 15; 
so that the position of Gesenius, 
respecting its recent introduction, is 
without foundation. His remark, how- 
ever, that 708 nmD is the only instance 
of a substantive and an adjective 
being both in construction with the 
following noun, is worthy of notice. 
10, Either this was mere bluster on 
the part of Rabshakeh, or he may 
have been encouraged in his expedition 


900 


15 


16 


17 


18 


ISATAH. [CHAP. XXXVI. 


am come up against this land to destroy it? Jehovah hath said 
tome, Go up to this land, and destroy it. Then Eliakim, Shebna, 
and Joach, said to Rabshakeh, Speak, we pray, to thy servants 
in Aramaic, for we understand it, but do not speak to us in 
Jewish, in the hearing of the people that are on the wall. But 
Rabshakeh said, Was it to thy master, and to thee, that my 
master sent me to speak these words? Was it not to the men 
who sit on the wall, who are to eat their own excrements and 
drink their own urine, along with you? And Rabshakeh stood. 
and cried with a loud voice in Jewish, and said, Hear ye the 
words of the great king, the king of Assyria: Thus saith the 
king, Let not Hezekiah deceive you; for he is not able to 
deliver you. And let not Hezekiah make you confide in 
Jehovah, saying, Jehovah will surely deliver us; this city shall 
not be surrendered to the king of Assyria. Hearken not to 
Hezekiah ; for thus saith the king of Assyria, Make peace with 
me, and come out to me, and eat ye, each of his own vine, and 
each of his own fig-tree, and drink ye, each of the water of his 
own cistern ; till 1 come and take you to a land like your own 
land; a land of corn and new wine, a land of bread-corn and 
vineyards. Let not Hezekiah deceive you, saying, Jehovah 
will deliver us. Did the gods of the nations deliver, each his 


by some false prophet, who pretended 
to have a revelation from Jehovah on 
the subject. 

11. maw, Aramaic, the language 
spoken not only in the western divi- 
sions of Syria, on the confines of the 
Holy Land, but also in Mesopotamia, 
and even further to the east. mn, 
Jewish, i.e. Hebrew; but appropriately 
so termed, as the ten tribes had by 
this time been carried into captivity. 

12. The Keri has here, as elsewhere, 
euphemistically Dpx2 for DIYS VW, and 
Dm) for oF. On this point 
the Jewish literati have been ex- 
tremely sensitive: the editors of the 
Soncin. and Brix. editions actually 
adopting DY." of the Keri into 
the text ; and others, who would not 
venture so far, leaving an open space 
sufficient to admit the word Ὁ, the 
vowel-points of which they have not 
scrupled to insert. The > in 2%, and 
nm, expresses destination. Rab- 
shakeh calls the attention of the in- 


habitants to the extremities to which 
they should be reduced in the siege, 
and excites them to rebellion, by 
pointing out the impossibility of their 
successful resistance of the attack. 
16, 7273, dlessing, is here evidently 
used in the acceptation of Οὐ, peace. 
Thus the Chald. δορὰ ay Ὑτὴν ; Saad. 


_siyele. On the other hand Diy is 


frequently used for 773, in the sense 
of salute. 

17. The Jews, on capitulating, should 
enjoy their liberty till the Assyrian 
army returned from Egypt, when they 
should be transported, according to 
the custom of those times, to the land 
of the conqueror. The country be- 
yond the Euphrates or the Tigris 
they would find as fertile and plentiful 
as their own. There is here a con- 
siderable abbreviation of the text in 
2 Kings. 

18, 19. Rabshakeh regarded Je- 
hovah merely as a local deity, entitled 


CHAP. XXXVII.| 


ISAIAH. 301 


19 own land, from the hand of the king of Assyria? Where are 


20 


21 


the gods of Hamath and Arpad? Where are the gods of 
Sepharvaim ? Did they deliver Samaria from my hand? Who 
among all the gods of these lands delivered their country from 
my hand, that Jehovah should deliver Jerusalem from my 
hand? And they were silent, and did not answer him a word ; 
for the king’s order was, Ye shall not answer him. And 
Eliakim, the son of Hilkiah, who was over the household, and 
Shebna, the secretary, and Joach, the son of Asaph, the annalist, 
came to Hezekiah, with rent garments, and told him the words 


of Rabshakeh. 


to no greater consideration than those 
of other cities which had been taken 
by the Assyrians. For Hamath, and 


the most southerly city of Mesopo- 
tamia, situated on the east bank of 
the Euphrates. It was from this city, 
or the district belonging to it, that 
colonists were sent to occupy the 
land of Israel, 2 Kings xvii. 24. The 
opinion of Vitringa, that some Syro- 
pheenician city is meant, which Koppe 


adopts, is without sufficient foun- 
dation. Thetextin Kings adds Hena, 
and Ivah, which afterwards occur in 
this history. The ἡ in 3) has an in- 
terrogative force, which the versions 
express. It is, however, omitted in 
three of Kennicott’s Codices, and was 


of Kings reads. 

22. Comp. chap. xxxili. 7. The 
rending of the garments was a common 
and very expressive token of grief 
among the Hebrews, and other eastern 
nations. Comp. chap. xxxvii. 1. 


1 


CHAPTER XXXVII. 


AND it came to pass, when king Hezekiah heard them, he 
rent his clothes, and covered himself with sackcloth, and went 
into the house of Jehovah, and sent Eliakim, who was over the 
household, and Shebna, the secretary, and the elders of the 
priests, covered with sackcloth, to Isaiah, the son of Amoz, the 
prophet. And they said to him, Thus saith Hezekiah: This 
day is a day of distress, and rebuke, and calumny ; for the 
children are come to the birth, and there is not strength to 


3. The concluding sentence in this 
verse is proverbial, and is expressive 
of the greatest danger, and despair 
of deliverance. The inhabitants of 
Jerusalem were like a woman in child- 


birth, whose strength is completely 
exhausted, so that she sinks helpless 
at the very moment when it is most 
required, 


802 


10 


ISAIAH. [CHAP, XXXVII. 


bring forth. Perhaps Jehovah, thy God, will hear the words 
of Rabshakeh, whom the king of Assyria, his master, hath sent 
to reproach the living God, and will reprove the words which 
Jehovah thy God hath heard; wherefore, offer up a prayer for 
the existing remnant. And the servants of king Hezekiah 
came to Isaiah. And Isaiah said to them, Thus shall ye say to 
your master: Thus saith Jehovah, Be not afraid on account of 
the words which thou hast heard, with which the striplings of 
the king of Assyria have blasphemed me. Behold! I will 
inspire him with courage; but he shall hear a report, and shall 
return to his own country; and I will cause him to fall by the 
sword in his own country. 

Then Rabshakeh returned, and found the king of Assyria 
besieging Libnah ; for he had heard that he had departed from 
Lachish. And he heard of Tirhakah, king of Cush, saying, 
He cometh forth to fight thee. And when he heard it, he sent 
messengers to Hezekiah, saying, Thus shall ye speak to 
Hezekiah, king of Judah, saying, Let not thy God, in whom 


4, Vin nxn, is inferential, wherefore, 
on this account. 

6. 02, lads, striplings, is used con- 
temptuously instead of 0°72Y, servants ; 
though, in other connexions, it is 

_ equivalent to it. 

7. 77 42 7) ‘27 has been variously in- 
terpreted. Some think there is here 
a distinct prediction of the miraculous 
destruction of Sennacherib’s army, 
which they suppose to have been 
effected by means of the simoom, or 
hot wind from the Arabian desert. 
Of this our translators appear to have 
approved—rendering the words, “ Be- 
hold, I will send a blast upon him.” 
To such construction, however, it 
must be objected, that it is at variance 
with the idiomatic force of 21% 0), 
which uniformly signifies to czspire, 
endow mentally, endue with life, will, 
determination, ὅθ, On the same prin- 
ciple πνεῦμα δειλίας, proposed by Secker, 
and approved by Hendewerk, must be 
rejected. Déder. consilium ; Rosenm. 
voluntatem; Gesen. and Hitzig, dis- 
position; none of which satisfies the 
claims of the passage. On the other 
hand, as [™ is more than once used in 
the sense of fortitude, courage, &c., as 
Josh. ii. 11, v. 1; 1 Kings x. 5, it may 


appropriately be taken in this accep- 
tation in the present instance. Je- 
hovah declares that he would inspire 
the king of Assyria with resolution to 
prosecute the ends of his expedition ; 
but at the moment of his proceeding 
to meet Tirhakah, intelligence of the 
overthrow of that part of his army 
which lay before Jerusalem would 
reach him, and occasion his immediate 
flight. It is evidently to this, and not 
to the report respecting Tirhakah, 
ver. 9, that the 7y2¥ refers, since the 
result of that report was not his 
effecting an immediate retreat, but 
his sending a fresh embassy to Heze- 
kiah to induce him to capitulate, in 
order that he might be at liberty to 
employ his entire force against the 
Ethiopian monarch. 

8. Whether Sennacherib succeeded 
in taking Lachish or not, cannot be 
determined, though it is more likely 
he had. 72, LXX. AcBvd, AoBva, a 
city of the priests, in the south of 
Judah. Eusebius calls it AoBava, and 
places it in the vicinity of Eleuthero- 
polis. 

9. For an account of Tirhakah, see 
chap. xviii. 

10, The Assyrian monarch repeats, 


CHAP. XXXVII.] 


11 


12 


13 


ISAIAH. 303 


thou confidest, deceive thee, saying, Jerusalem shall not be 
surrendered to the king of Assyria. Behold! thou hast heard 
what the kings of Assyria have done to all the countries, 
devoting them to destruction; and shalt thou be delivered ? 
Did the gods of the nations, which my fathers destroyed, deliver 
them? Gozan, and Haran, and Retzeph, and the Edenites, 
which are in Telassar? Where is the king of Hamath, and 
the king of Arpad, and the king of the city of the Sepharvaites, 


of Henah, and Ivah ? 
14 


And Hezekiah received the letters from the hand of the 


messengers, and read them, and went up to the house of 


15 


Jehovah, and spread them before Jehovah. And Hezekiah 


16 prayed to Jehovah, saying, Ὁ Jehovah of Hosts, the God of 


in an amplified form, the argument 
which he had already employed, chap. 
XXxvi. 18—20. 

12. 33, Gozan, in all probability the 
Tavoaviris of Ptolemy, v. 18, situated 
between the rivers Chaboras and 
Saccoras. Some would place it on 
the Kissil-Osan, a river in the north 
of Persia, which flows into the Caspian 
Sea; but its immediate connexion 
with Haran favours the former inter- 
pretation. Comp. 2 Kings xvii. 6, 
Xviil. 11, where the Chaboras is called 
the river of Gozan. 0, Haran, LXX. 
Xappay, 81, 1 Chron. v. 26, an ancient 
city-in Mesopotamia, Gen. xi. 31, xii. 
5, xxvli. 43 ; the Kappau, Carre, of the 
Greeks and Romans, and celebrated for 
the defeat of Crassus. 421, Rezeph. 
Jakut, in his Geog., mentions not fewer 
than nine towns of this name ; as does 
also Abulfeda in his Tab. Syr. Most 
probably the one here specified is the 
“Pnodda of Ptolemy, v. 15, or the Re- 
sapha Heshami of Abulfeda ; situated 
somewhat short of a day’s journey to 
the west of the Euphrates. y1v™~23, the 
children, i.e. the inhabitants of Hden. 
That the Eden here spoken of cannot 
be the Eden of Damascus, Amos i. 5, 
situated between Tripoli and Baalbek, 
seems clear, from its occurring in 
connexion with Haran, as it also does, 
Ezek, xxvii. 23. It is most likely the 


Syrian, pose » Maedan, which Asse- 


man, Bib. Orien. i. p. 224, places in 
the province of Diarbekr. This place 


or district the Assyrians appear to 
have conquered, and transplanted the 
inhabitants to Wwn, 2 Kings xix. 12, 
in full weir, Telassar, which is sup- 
posed to be the same as 1038, Hllasar, 
Gen. xiv. 1; a country or district 
somewhere to the north of Shinar. 


Saad. ἀλλο» Armenia. 


can be no doubt that it is used by 
Isaiah—not of the rulers or chief 
magistrates of these cities, but of 
their idols, to which the Syrians and 
Phoenicians gave the name, as D7 79, 
ΤΡ Ξε ἢ pod, &. vy, LXX. (2 Kings 
XVili. 34) "Ava, Ava, probably the city 
ale 
situated in Mesopotamia, on a ford of 
the Euphrates. my, 2 Kings xvii. 24, sy, 
Ivah, a city respecting which nothing 
further is known, than that it was taken 
by the king of Assyria, and its inha- 
bitants were sent to colonize Samaria. 

14. Instead of 718779, the text of 
2 Kings, and De Rossi's MS. 380, read 
DxXw in the plural; yet both have 
the following 75) in the singular. 
Both may be reconciled by taking the 
plural distributively, each of them, 
singly, or such like. 

15—20. A most appropriate and 
beautiful prayer, expressive of a clear 
faith and confident trust in Jehovah, 
as the only God, in opposition to the 
claims advanced by idolaters in behalf 


of the Arabian geographers, 


904 


17 


18 
19 


20 


ISATAH. [CHAP. XXXVII. 


Israel, that sittest between the cherubs! Thou alone art the 
God of all the kingdoms of the earth. Thou hast made the 
heavens, and the earth. Incline, O Jehovah! thine ear, and 
hear; open, O Jehovah! thine eyes, and behold; and hear all 
the words of Sennacherib, which he hath sent to reproach the 
living God. In truth, O Jehovah! the kings of Assyria have 
destroyed all the nations, and their countries; and have cast 
their gods into the fire, (for they are not gods, but the work of 
men’s hands, wood and stone,) and destroyed them. And now, 
O Jehovah, our God! save us from his hand, that all the 


kingdoms of the earth may know that thou alone art Jehovah. 


21 


Then Isaiah, the son of Amoz, sent to Hezekiah, saying, 


Thus saith Jehovah, the God of Israel: Since thou hast prayed 


22 


to me concerning Sennacherib, the king of Assyria, this is the 


thing which Jehovah hath spoken respecting him : 


of their deities ; and recognising the 
Divine glory as the result of the 
supplicated deliverance, 

16, DET AW, lit. the Inhabiter of the 
cherubs, but, according to Exod. xxv. 
22, DIT MD pr, between the two che- 
rubs, placed one on each side of the 
mercy-seat, the throne of Jehovah’s 
visible glory among the Hebrews. For 
the meaning of 273, see on chap. vi. 2. 
NUT, In OVNI NIT TY, possesses peculiar 
emphasis: Thou art He who art, &c. 
ἢ. 6. the true, or really existing God. 
What is added, “Thou hast made,” 
&c., Zwinglius calls an elegans prosa- 
podosis, shewing that God had a right 
to all things, because he was their 
Maker. 

17. For 47%, fifty-five MSS,, and ori- 
ginally ¢ez more, the Soncin., Brix., 
and sixteen other editions read in full, 
72», which is the reading in 2 Kings. 
The LXX., Syr., Vulg., and Arab. have 
the plural, “‘ thine eyes,’’ which is un- 
doubtedly right. Gesenius has here 
the very ingenious observation, that 
the use of the singular in reference 
to the ear, and that of the dual in 
reference to the eye, is equally in 
accordance with the wsws loguendi, and 
with fact. When we would listen to 
any one we naturally incline ove of our 
ears towards him, but when we would 
look at any thing we open doth our 
eyes. 


18, ὈΞ ΤΙΝῚ Nsw ΠΝ, lit. all the 
lands and their land; in Kings sms 
Dosw), the nations and their land, 
which is the reading in Isaiah of up- 
wards of twelve MSS.; yet most 
probably by correction, since all the 
versions have ΠΊΣΤΙΝ, Hither Isaiah 
understood by nizix, zations, those 
who inhabit countries ; or, he was led 
to use the term the better to suit the 
preceding verb 7, which nowhere 
else occurs in application to people, 
except chap. lx. 12. The only objec- 
tion against the present reading is 
the harshness of the repetition; fx 
being otherwise used metonymically 
for the inhabitants of a country, 
Judges xviii. 30; Isa. xi. 4. In 2 
Chron. xxxii. 13, we find ΓΒ τ “3, 
and oYIwny, immediately following— 
so that, after all, there may here be 
an ellipsis of 3. 

19. 12}, the historical Infin. which 
we find Isaiah also employing chap. 
v. 5, et freq. The text of Kings has 
333), 

“20. mmx, in Tim TAY, is emphatic. 
Comp. Ps. xc. 3. In Kings, D8 is 
added to mim, After wy, upwards 
of twenty MSS. add %2, which the 
text in Kings exhibits ; but it is not 
expressed in any of the versions. 

22. On 7Yna, virgin, in application 
to cities, see chap. xxiii. 12. Micha- 
elis notices, that previous to the con- 


CHAP. XXXVIL.| 


ISAIAH. 


305 


The virgin daughter of Zion despiseth thee, she laugheth at 


thee ; 


The daughter of Jerusalem shaketh her head at thee. 


23 


Whom hast thou reproached and blasphemed ? 


Yea, against whom hast thou raised thy voice, 


And lifted up thine eyes ? 


Against the Holy One of Israel. 


24 


By thy servants thou hast reproached the Lord, and hast said : 


With the multitude of my chariots have I ascended 

The heights of the mountains, the recesses of Lebanon ; 

I have also cut down its tallest cedars, its choicest cypresses ; 
And reached its extreme height, its finest forest. 


bo 
Or 


I have dug and drunk water ; 


And will dry up, with my feet, all the streams of Egypt. 


Hast thou not heard, that of old I prepared it, 


And planned it from ancient days ? 


quest of Magdeburg, in 1630, the 
arms of that town exhibited a young 
woman with a virgin crown upon her 
head ; but after that event she held 
the crown in her hand. To shake the 
head at one, was, among the Hebrews, 
an expression of contempt. This the 
inhabitants of Jerusalem would do 
when Sennacherib was compelled to 
flee. Comp. κινεῖν τὴν κεφαλὴν, Matt. 
XXVil. 39. 

23—25. Here the insolent monarch 
is called to account for his blasphe- 
mous arrogance ; and a specimen is 
given of the vaunting language which 
he had dared to employ. No‘obstacle 
had hitherto impeded him in his pro- 
gress. The most inaccessible regions 
of Lebanon had been explored by his 
troops ; and, in the wanton pride of 
his heart, he had made havoc of its 
most stately trees. Nor had he ex- 
perienced any want of water in the 
desert for the supply of his immense 
army ; the mere introduction of which 
into Egypt would dry up the Nile, 
and all its branches! The language 
is mainly figurative ; since the march- 
ing of troops over the ridges of 
Lebanon would have been as prepos- 
terous as the conveyance of chariots 
over those elevated, precipitous, and 
snow-clad regions impossible. As he 


had conquered every difficulty, so 
now he would carry all before him. 
Comp. for the phraseology, chap. x. 
18; and for a parallel specimen of 
his boasting, ver. 13, 14, of the same 
chapter. Comp. also chap. xiv. 13, 
14, Thus Alaric, boasting of his con- 
quests :— : 


“cum cesserit omnis 
Obsequiis natura meis? Subsidere 
nostris 
Sub pedibus montes; arescere vidi- 
mus amunes. 
Fregi Alpes galeisque Padum victri- 
cibus hausi.” 
Claudian, de Bello Get. 526, 532. 


Thus also Juvenal describes the 

Greeks under Xerxes :— 

{ credimus.altos 

Defecisse amnes, epotaque flumina 
Medo 

Prandente, et madidis cantat que 
Sostratus alis.”—Sut. x. 176. 


26. Nothing could be more sublime 
in effect than the suddenness with 
which Jehovah here interrupts the 
boasting monarch. “Be not proud 
of thy victories ; thou art merely an 


306 


Now [I bring it to pass, 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XXXVII. 


That thou shouldest convert fortified cities into desolate ruins. 


27 


Therefore are their inhabitants short of power ; 


They are dismayed and confounded ; 
They are as the grass of the field, and as the green herb ; 


As the grass on the roofs, 


And as grain blighted before it hath stalked. 


in, | know; 
And also thy rage against me. 


Have come up into mine ears, 


Yea, thy sitting down, and thy going out, and thy coming 


Because thy rage against me, and thine insolence, 


I will put my ring into thy nose, 


And my curb into thy lips, 


And turn thee back by the way which thou camest. 


30 


And this shall be a sign to thee: Eat this year that which 


groweth of itself; and in the second year, that which springeth 
up in like manner; and in the third year, sow and reap, plant 


instrument in my hand, by which I 
have punished wicked cities, as I long 
ago purposed and predicted through 
my prophets.” Scholz. Comp. chap. 
x. 5, 6. In Dz) 042 is no difficulty 
whatever, though Lowth stumbles at 
the words. Comp. xxv. 2; Jer. ix. 
9 (Heb. 10), li. 37, and iv. 7. 

27. Ὁ ΞΡ, short-handed, i.e. weak, 
powerless. Comp. ᾿ ial dy ye " Μὰ 
Knés Hist. x. Ves. pp. 9,10. Τὸ ex- 
press his power, Artaxerxes I. had the 
surname μακρόχειρ, Lougimanus. ΤΟ Τῷ, 
in Kings 727%, which three codices 
read here. The Ὁ has in all proba- 
bility been substituted for the 5, by 
some transcriber. The noun is derived 
from τ, ¢o scorch; Chald. τῶ, Zo 


burn; Arab. WSduv θυ , tenebrea ; 


the blackness of night. When corn is 
blighted, it becomes black. 

28. The accumulation in this verse 
is intended to express the utmost 
attention and most accurate know- 
ledge. Comp. Ps. exxxix. 2. 

29. The Mm was a hook, or ring, used 
for securing large marine animals, 
and for curbing land animals, such ag 


camels, buffaloes, ὅσο. Comp. Job xl. 
1, 2; Ezek. xxix. 4, xxxviii. 4. 

30. The prophet now addresses 
Hezekiah, and encourages him to 
exercise confidence in God, by giving 
him a token by which he should 
know that an entire deliverance from 
the Assyrians would ensue. This nix, 
sign, like that specified chap. vii. 14, 
consisted in the prophetic announce- 
ment of a future event, the miraculous 
accomplishment of which would con- 
firm the oracle. In the present in- 
stance the event was to be an 
abundant supply of provisions for 
two years, in the absence of all culti- 
vation of the ground. Instead of the 
accustomed produce, which had failed 
during the former of these years, 
either from the fields not having been 
sown at the time when the Assyrian 
army entered the country, or from 
its having been trampled upon and 
eaten up during the invasion, the 
Jews should find a sufficiency in that 
which grew spontaneously from what 
had remained in the ground after the 
crop of the preceding year had been 
reaped, Not only, however, was such 
spontaneous growth to suffice for one 


CHAP. XXXVII.] 


ISAIAH. 


907 


31 vineyards also, and eat the fruit of them. And the escaped of the 
house of Judah, that are left, shall again strike root downward, 


32 


and bear fruit upward. For out of Jerusalem shall go forth a 


remnant, and they that have escaped, from mount Zion: the 


33 


zeal of Jehovah of Hosts shall effect this. 


Therefore, thus 


saith Jehovah concerning the king of Assyria : 
He shall not come into this city, 


Nor shoot an arrow into it; 


He shall not present a shield before it, 
Nor throw up a mound against it. 


year ; but a second spontaneous crop 
was to spring from what in like 
manner might remain of it, to be a 
supply for the year ensuing, and for 
so much of the third as might elapse 
before harvest. It is generally believed, 
that the reason why the Jews were 
not at liberty to cultivate the ground 
the second year was, that it was either 
the sabbatical year, or that of jubilee ; 
though, from the uncertainty con- 
nected with the Hebrew chronology, 
it is scarcely possible satisfactorily to 
establish the point. At all events it 
must have required a special blessing 
(comp. Lev. xxv. 21) to render the 
earth sufficiently productive to secure 
the supply here promised, The terms 
map and ow scarcely, if at all, differ 
in signification. The former, the LXX. 
in 2 Kings xix. 29, and Lev. xxv. 5, 
render αὐτόματα, what springs up of 
itself; but here a ἕσπαρκας : the latter 
the LXX. give by τὸ κατάλειμμα, what 
is left; Aq. and Theod. αὐτοφυῆ. 


Comp. the Arab. ua , sustulit sese, 


elatus fuit. In Kings the reading is 
wrD—reversing the first and last 
letters.— 28, according to the ancient 
versions, and the following verbs, are 
imperatives used for the future, in 
order strongly to express the certainty 
of the event. See on chap. vi. 10. 
Instead of 3281, which might other- 
wise be pointed 728, the Keri has 
28, which is found in the text of 
more than forty codices, and in some 
of the earliest editions. It is like- 
wise supported by all the versions. 
Perhaps, however, this verb, in both 
the instances in which it is used in 


this verse, was designed to be taken 
as the Infinitive 728, employed ellip- 
tically for 28M 3x, eating, ye shall φαΐ, 
ie. ye shall certainly, or abundantly 
eat. Comp. 133, Exod. xx. 8; inv, 
Deut. v. 12. 

31, 32. By an easy transition, the 
prophet proceeds to foretel the pro- 
sperity which should follow to the 
nation, by comparing it to a tree, 
which strikes deep root in the ground, 
and, drinking in abundance of mois- 
ture, produces plenty of fruit. 2 
signifies to add to, increase, &c. ; and, 
connected as here with “WW, it indi- 
cates the depth and spread of the 
roots. By 7235 are meant those who 
had fled before the Assyrians; and 
by mixt, such as remained in the 
land, and were now in the power of 
the enemy, or such as continued safe 
within the walls of Jerusalem. When 
the enemy was no more, they would 
go forth at pleasure throughout the 
land : some to their homes, and some 
to assist in cultivating the ground, 
and repairing what had been laid 
waste. Comp. Nah.ii.3. For the last 
clause of ver. 32, comp. chap. ix. 6. 

33—35. In these verses a positive 
assurance is given, that, instead of 
advancing with the rest of his army, 
and laying regular siege to Jerusalem, 
Sennacherib should, through the gra- 
cious interposition of Jehovah, be 
compelled to return to his own coun- 
try. That some preparations for an 
attack had previously been made by 
the division under Rabshakeh is evi- 
dent from chap. xxix. 3; so that the 
present prediction must relate to what 
Hezekiah still apprehended—a siege 


908 


ISATAH. 


(CHAP. XXXVII. 


34 By the very way he came shall he return, 
And shall not come into this city, saith Jehovah. 
35 For I will protect this city, and deliver it, 
For my own sake, and for the sake of David my servant. 


36 


And an angel of Jehovah went forth, and smote in the camp 


of the Assyrians, an hundred and eighty-five thousand men ; 
and when men arose early in the morning, behold! they were 


37 all dead corpses. 


by the Assyrian monarch himself, at 
the head of his entire army. Accord- 
ing to this interpretation, the two 
passages are in perfect harmony with 
each other. For the promise of pro- 
tection here given, comp. chap. xxxi. 5. 

36. That the term azgel was ever 
figuratively employed by the Hebrews 
to designate any agent in the material 
world cannot be proved, though it has 
become almost fashionable in inter- 
preters to assert it. We are not, 
therefore, at liberty to assign any 
other signification to it here, than 
that which it ordinarily bears ; viz. a 
celestial spirit employed as an instru- 
ment of Divine providence. There is 
nothing, however, to hinder us from 
supposing that this extraordinary and 
invisible agent employed secondary 
or mediate causes, just as an angel 
destroyed seventy thousand men by 
the’ pestilence, 2 Sam. xxiv. 15, 16; 
1 Chron, xxi. 14—18; or, as in the 
case of Herod, in which it is said, 
that “the angel of the Lord smote 
him—and he was eaten of worms.” 
Whether on the present occasion a 
miraculous simoom, a supernatural 
thunder-storm, or the plague λοίμικην 
νόσον, Joseph. Antiq. x. i. 5, were the 
means employed, we cannot, in the 
absence of data, determine. While 
there would be nothing miraculous in 
such a number of men dying of the 
plague,—it being a fact, related by 
Jahn, Antiq. i. 2, p. 392, that in the 
year 1580 it carried off about 500,900 
persons at Cairo in the course of 
seven months,—we cannot suppose it 
possible for it to have destroyed 
185,000 in one night, 2 Kings xix. 35, 
except it had been brought about 
through the intervention of a miracle. 
A distorted account of this catastrophe 


Then Sennacherib, the king of Assyria, broke 


was given to Herodotus by the Egyp- 
tian priests, who represented the 
scene to have been Pelusium ; Vulcan, 
the deity whose aid was invoked, and 
whom the Egyptians identified with 
the God of the Hebrews ; Sethos, the 
monarch who invoked it; and field- 
mice, the instruments by which the 
army of Sennacherib were in one 
night rendered powerless, and obliged 
to take to flight the following morning. 
The event was commemorated by a 
stone statue of Sethos, in the temple 
of Vulcan, with a mouse in his hand, 
and the inscription, ES EME ΤΙΣ 
‘OPEQN, EYSEBHS ESTQ, Let him who 
looks on me, reverence the gods. Herod, 
ii. 141. Michaelis is of opinion that, 
as the mouse was the Egyptian hiero- 
glyphic for destruction, Sethos held it 
in his hand to indicate the miraculous 
destruction of his enemy ; and that it 
was either misconstrued by the priests, 
or misunderstood by Herodotus. Vor- 
rede to the second half of Isaiah, p. 
xxxiL, and Anmerk. on chap. xix. p. 
107. Comp. in illustration of this 
verse, chap. x. 16, 32—34, xxix. 5, 6, 
xxx, 30,33) Xxx1- Θὲ 

37. For the accumulation ΟΣ YD" 
aw), to express haste, comp. Cicero’s 
abiit, excessit, evasit, erupit, in his de- 
scription of the flight of Catiline. 
It is implied in 1%), avd he dwelt, that 
Sennacherib was not murdered imme- 
diately on his return to Nineveh. 
What authority Hales had for the 
statement, that he was assassinated 
fifty-five days after his arrival, | know 
not; but, according to the extracts 
from Berosus and Abydenos, in the 
Armenian translation of Euseb. Chron. 
1. p. 41, he still lived sixteen years ; 
reduced the Babylonians to obedience, 
who had rebelled under Elibus, the 


CHAP. XXXVIII.] 


ISAIAH. 


309 


38 up, and set off, and returned, and dwelt at Nineveh. And it 
came to pass, as he was worshipping in the house of Nisroch 
his god, that Adrammelech and Sharetzer, his sons, slew him 
with the sword, and made their escape into the country of Ara- 
rat; and Esarhaddon, his son, reigned in his stead. 


successor of Merodach Baladan ; 
gained a victory over the Greeks in 
Cilicia ; and founded the city of Tar- 
sus. See Gesen. Comment. p. 999— 
1002. Both Hitzig and Gesenius place 
the year of his death in the year B.C. 
696. When the prophet states that he 
dwelt in Nineveh, his meaning is, that 
he never after returned to Palestine. 
Of his exploits elsewhere no. account 
is taken, as they did not affect the 
Jews. 

38. 13, Nisroch, i.e. the great Eagle, 


from 33, Arab. » » eagle, and the in- 
tensive syllable J}, This bird the 


ancient Persians held in peculiar vene- 
ration, and regarded it as the symbol 
of Ormuzd: it was likewise worship- 
ped as a deity by the Arabs, before 
the time of Mohammed. Of the two 
royal parricides, Adrammelech was in 
all probability the principal, and is the 
only one mentioned by Berosus, under 
the name of Ardumusanus. For 
Ararat, see on chap. xiii. 4. The 
LXX. translate ’Appevia. For an ac- 
count of Hzar-haddon, see Winer’s 
Realworterb. What ground Russell 
has for asserting, in his Connexion of 
Sac. and Prof. Hist., that he parti- 
cipated in the guilt of his father’s 
murder, does not appear. 


CHAPTER XXXVIII. 


This chapter contains an account of the dangerous sickness of Hezekiah, 1— 
3; the sign given him that his days should be lengthened, 4—8 ; his reco- 
very, and the beautiful eucharistical ode which he composed after his resto- 


ration to health, 9—22. 


> 


1 In those days Hezekiah was sick unto death ; and Isaiah the 


1. The phrase 077 Ὁ, iz those 
days, does not necessarily imply that 
what follows took place at or before 
the time of Sennacherib’s invasion ; 
though this has been asserted by the 
author of Seder Olam Rabba, Usher, 
Lightfoot, Prideaux, Zwinglius, v. d. 
Palm, Hendewerk, and others. On 
the other hand, Calvin, Pareus, Pis- 
cator, Le Clerc, Vitringa, Scheidius, 
Rosenmiiller, Gesenius, and Winer, 


maintain that it happened after the 
retreat of the Assyrian monarch ; and 
to this opinion I cannot but accede. 
It is in the highest degree improbable, 
that the king of Babylon, who was at 
the time tributary to Sennacherib, 
would have ventured to send a con- 
gratulatory embassy to Hezekiah, if 
he had not received previous infor- 
mation of the defeat, chap. xxxix, 
1. Comp. 2 Chron. xxxii. 22—24, 


QQ 


310 


ISATAH. [CHAP. XXXVIII. 


prophet, the son of Amoz, came to him, and said to him, Thus 
saith Jehovah: Charge thy house; for thou shalt die, and not 
live. Then Hezekiah turned his face to the wall, and prayed to 
Jehovah, and said: O Jehovah! I beseech thee remember now 
how I have walked before thee in truth, and with a perfect 
heart, and have done that which was good in thy sight; and 
Hezekiah wept exceedingly. Then the word of Jehovah came 
to Isaiah, saying: Go, and say to Hezekiah, Thus saith Jeho- 
vah, the God of David thy father: I have heard thy prayer ; 
I have seen thy tears; behold! I will add to thy days fifteen 
years. And I will deliver thee, and this city, from the hand 
of the king of Assyria; and I will protect this city. And 
this shall be the sign to thee from Jehovah, that Jehovah will 


.8 do the thing which he hath spoken. 


Behold! I will cause 


the shadow of degrees, which hath gone down, by the sun, 


The promise, ver. 6, cannot be urged 
as a valid objection, since it is merely 
a repetition of that in chap. xxxvii. 
35; and was given to remove from the 
mind of the king all fear of future 
attacks on the part of the Assyrians. 
Dathe renders, Hodem illo anno; Dé6- 
derlein, Circa hoc tempus. As, however, 
Hezekiah reigned only twenty-nine 
years, and fifteen of them were those 
added to his life through the Divine 
goodness, it is evident that his reco- 
very must have happened in the course 
of the remaining portion of the four- 
teenth year of his reign—which was 
that of the Assyrian invasion. For 
the nature of his sickness, see on ver. 
21. The words 42? 1, give charge to 
thy house, is equivalent to our making 
a last will: hence the Rabbin. “xx, 
a will, or testament. Comp. 2 Sam. 
XVii. 29. 

2. The pious monarch turned to- 
wards the wall by the side of which 
his couch stood, that he might present 
his prayer, undisturbed by what might 
be passingin the chamber. See Lowth’s 
note. Ina very different spirit Ahab 
turned away his face, 1 Kings xxi. 4. 

3. The terms, 090, perfect, and Nx, 
truth,in this connexion, and frequently, 
when used of the Jewish kings, have 
a special reference to sincere endea- 
vours to establish and maintain the 
pure worship of Jehovah, in opposition 


to all idolatrous intermixtures. Comp. 
the Arab. pos integer a ποῖα et vitiis ; 


lw, énteger vitii expers; »bw\\, religio 
Y Pp ¢ Ly 

, one addicted to 

and professing the true faith, i.e. Is- 


lamism. 

4, The parallel passage in Kings is 
fuller and more special. 

6. See on ver. 1. 

8. According to the longer narrative 
in Kings, it was placed at the option 
of Hezekiah, whether the shadow on 
the dial should go forward ten degrees, 
or go backward ten degrees ; the latter 
of which he chose, as being the more 
remarkable. With respect to the 
niyo of Ahaz, it has been disputed 
whether ὦ suz-dial introduced by that 
monarch, or the steps leading up to his 
palace, be meant. The former is the 
rendering of the Chald. vw y2x, howr- 
stone, and of Symm., and Jerome, ἐν 
ὡρολογίῳ, in horologio; the latter, 
that of the LXX. ἀναβαθμῶν, and 


Saad. us! . None of the objec- 


Muhammedica ; 


tions that have been raised against 
the existence of a dial at that time in 
Jerusalem, are of any weight. Anaxi- 
mander, to whom the Greeks ascribe 
the division of time by hours, and the 
introduction of the sun-dial, travelled 


CHAP. XXXVIII.| . 


on the dial of Ahaz, to go back ten degrees. 


ISAIAH. 


aid 
And the sun 


turned back ten degrees, by the degrees by which it had 


gone down. 


9 THE WRITING OF HEZEKIAH, KING OF JUDAH, WHEN HE HAD 
BEEN SICK, AND HAD RECOVERED FROM HIS SICKNESS : 


in Chaldea about the time of the 
captivity, and very probably became 
acquainted with both during his in- 
tercourse with the Oriental astrono- 
mers. Indeed, Herodotus expressly 
states, ii. 109, that the Greeks obtained 
the knowledge of the pole, the dial, 
and the division of the day into 
twelve parts, from the Babylonians. 
It is not at all unlikely, that Ahaz, 
who appears to have been fond of 
foreign objects of art, 2 Kings xvi. 
10, obtained a sun-dial from Babylon ; 
and that it is to this, rather than to 
any steps which he had caused to be 
made, that reference is had in the 
present case. The circumstance, too, 
of the interest taken by the Baby- 
lonians in the event of the retrogra- 
dation of the shadow, confirms this 
hypothesis. Elias Chomer, a Jewish 
Rabbi, supposes the dial to have been 
a concave hemisphere, having in the 
middle a globe, the shadow of which 
fell upon certain lines, which marked 
the time. Of the length of the de- 
grees we are not informed ; but that 
they bore some proportion to the 
length of the day is probable, from 
the selection of the number ἔθη, rather 
than fifteen,—that of the years which 
Hezekiah was to live. 

The infidel objection to the event, 
derived from the motion of the sun 
being opposed to the well-known con- 
struction of the mundane system, is 
at once met by the facts,—that there 
is no more inconsistency in speaking 
of the sun going back, than there is in 
our speaking of his risizy and setting ; 
and that what is called the sz in one 
part of the verse, is called the shadow 
in the other,—the cause, by a common 
figure of speech, being put for the 
effect. Nor is there any necessity for 
supposing, that, on the occasion, the 
earth was actually arrested in her 
progress round the sun, and turned 
so far back in a contrary direction as 


to produce the difference in degrees 
here specified: since all that was 
necessary to produce the effect was 
to bend, or cause a change in the 
direction of the rays of light, so as to 
make them retrograde on the dial. 
Partial phenomena of this descrip- 
tion have been observed in modern 
times. On the 27th of March, 1703, 
P. Romauld, prior of the cloister at 
Metz, made the observation, that, 
owing to such a refraction of the solar 
rays in the higher regions of the 
atmosphere, in connexion with the 
appearance of a cloud, the shadow on 
his dial deviated an hour and a half. 
The production of such a phenomenon, 
on a scale of such magnitude, how- 
ever, as that stated by Isaiah, could 
not but be regarded as a remarkable 
interposition of Divine power; and 
the foreknowledge of it, on the part of 
the prophet, must have been strictly 
miraculous. The words, wow 20m) 
nya wy, And the sun went back ten 
degrees, are wanting in three of Ken- 
nicott’s MSS., and originally in two 
of De Rossi’s: they are likewise 
omitted in the Syr.; but their omis- 
sion, and that of wown, ¢he suv, in the 
Kénigsberg Cod., is most probably an 
emendation. This last word, however, 
does not occur in Kings. 

9. This eucharistical ode of Heze- 
kiah, which is wanting in Kings, is 
distinguished for its peculiar sweet- 
ness and tenderness; the plaintive 
tone which pervades it ; and the ex- 
treme conciseness of its style. “ Est 
autem carmen hoc cum primis doctum 
et elegans.” Zwinglius. It chiefly 
describes the state of his feelings 
during his sickness. Of its genuine- 
ness and authenticity there can exist 
no doubt. That this pious king was 
fond of poetry appears from Proy. 
xxy. 1; so that there is every reason 
to regard the > in wp) as the Lamed 
Auctoris, 31920, LXX. προσευχὴ, but 


812 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XXXVIII. 


10 I said: In the meridian of my days I shall enter the gates of 


Sheol ; 


I am deprived of the residue of my years. 
11 I said: I shall no more see JAH, 


JAH in the land of the living ; 
I shall no more behold man, 


With the inhabitants of the world. 


the Alex. Cod. δὴ : οἱ λοι. γραφὴ: a 
song committed to writing, with a 
view to commemorate the Divine 
goodness. The reader will do well to 
consult on this ode the very learned 
Dissertatio Philologico-Exegetica of 
Ever. Scheid., Lugd. Batav. 1769, 8vo. 

10, ‘273, Vulg. ἐμ dimidio, a figurative 
mode of expression, taken from the 
apparent stationary position of the 
sun at noon. This idea, the LXX. 
doubtless meant to express, when 
they rendered ἐν τῷ ὕψει, though 
Jerome thinks they mistook the 7 for 
a. The root is 23, ¢o be silent, rest, 


&c. Comp. Gieuhar. ἜΝ ἘΝ 
ἐντὶ SS ες» spoken of “the sun 


when he stands in the midst of 
heaven.” It is equivalent to the 
Greek, ἐν τῇ μεσημβρίᾳ τοῦ βίου, and 
our “meridian of life.” Coverdale: 
in my best age. 'Tingstadius : lefnads- 
middag. Wezekiah, reflecting that, at 
the age of thirty-nine, he had only, 
as it were, reached the mid-day of 
human life, (see Ps. xc. 10,) laments 
the prospect of early death. This in- 
terpretation is preferable to that 
adopted by Gesenius and others, who 
render, “in the tranquillity of my days ;” 
as the corresponding member of the 
parallelism shews. On xv, Sheol, see 
chap. v. 14. ΠΕ, I am visited, 1. 6. 
punished, as it respects the residue 
of the years I might have lived ; de- 
prived of them. See for the Accus. 
as here used, Ewald, § 482. Some 
render, 7 shall be missing, which is not 
contrary to Hebrew usage. 

11. ™ occurs only once in three of 
De Rossi’s MSS. and in the Syr. ; and 
two Codices have originally read 717 ; 
but there can be no doubt, from the 
tone of the poem, that the repetition 


is genuine. Comp. the repetition of 
“9, ver. 17, and of ‘0, ver. 19. The 
vision of God, to which Hezekiah 
here refers, was the contemplation of 
the Divine glory in the temple. He 
had taken great pains to restore the 
temple-worship, and anticipated, with 
pious delight, those manifestations of 
the presence of Jehovah, which he 
had promised to his assembled people. 
The loss of this privilege he here 
deplores. Comp. Ps. xxvii. 4, Lxiii. 2, 
and the Note on chap. xxxiii. 17. The 
LXX. have τὸ σωτήριον τοῦ Θεοῦ, 
“the salvation of God,” (see on xl. 5,) 
—as if they considered the appear- 
ance of Messiah to have been the 
object of his vision. “The land of 
the living” is contrasted with Sheol, 
the state of the departed. That 577, 
which occurs only here, is to be ren- 
dered, place of cessation or rest, and ap- 
plied to the grave, as Vitringa, 
Scheidius, Rosenmiiller, v. d. Palm, 
Gesenius, Winer, Hitzig, and others, 
maintain, the parallelism seems abso- 
lutely to forbid—17 Δ, correspond- 
ing so exactly to oT px. I cannot, 
therefore, but agree with those inter- 
preters who consider 777 to be identical 
in meaning with 137; especially as 
the only difference consists in a trans- 
position of the letters 7 and 9; and 
the precisely similar phrase, 177 20, 
occurs Ps. xlix.2. For other instances 
of transposition, comp. 2) and 203, 
3 and %2D, Fw and AY. For ὙΠ, 


comp. the Arab. WS, perennavit, et 
sempiternus fuit ; S\%, perennitas, secu- 
lum, D3%, world. Thus here Saad. 
Lo} ; and the Chald. sx, the earth. 


LXX. ἐπὶ γῆς. Tingstad, cbland verl- 
dens inbyggare. Six MSS. read ὑπ; 
and four more have done so at first. 


CHAP. ΧΧΧΥΠΙ.] 


ISAIAH. 


313 


12 My habitation is plucked up, and removed from me, 


Like the tent of a shepherd ; 


I roll up, like a weaver, my life ; 
From the thrum he cutteth me off; 
From morning to night thou makest an end of me. 


13 


I compose myself till the morning, 


Then, like a lion, he breaketh in pieces all my bones ; 
From morning to night thou makest an end of me. 
14 Like the swallow and the crane I twitter ; 


I moan like the dove ; 


12. 7, ὦ circle, dwelling, tent, &c. 
Arab. le, the same, from 7, ye to 


move round in a circle, be round, &c., to 
live in a circular tent, or in tents 
placed in a circular form ; in which 
way the Nomades usually construct 
their dwellings. D2 1s specially used 
of pulling up the pins by which the 
cords of a tent have been fixed to the 
ground, comp. chap. xxxill. 20; and 
m3, to uncover, remove, &c., in applica- 
tion to the removal of the cloth or 
covering of the tent, &c. “ Nomadee 
quum pascua mutant, tabernacula 
convolyunt atque abeunt.” Zwinglius. 
Comp. for the figure Jer. iv. 20, x. 20; 
2 Cor. v.1; 2 Pet. i. 183—15. It was 
very common for the Hebrews and 
other Orientals to speak of the body 
as atent. It was regarded not as the 
proper person, but merely his tempo- 
rary habitation. Comp. 2 Cor. v. 1; 
2 Pet. 1. 13,14. °29, from me, is empha- 
tic, in the same view of the subject. 
5, pastoralis, Winer. ° added to 
words, sometimes expresses a quality 
or attribute ; as "122, 22771. See Gesen. 
Lehrgeb. p. 524—Hezekiah next com- 
pares the finishing of his life to the 
rolling up of a web, which, when 
finished, is cut off from the thrum. 


1p, Arab. 28, to contract, roll up, &e. 


Tingstadius: Jag vicklar thop. This 
was all that was left for the monarch 
to do, since God had, to all appear- 
ance, cut short his days. Comp. Job 
vi. 9. 21 properly signifies what hangs 
down, such as hair from the head, 
threads, thrums, and the like. Comp. 
Song vii. 6. The nomin. to ws» and 


to 12%, in the following verse, is 71, 
understood. Recognising the Divine 
hand in what had taken place, he ad- 
dresses himself directly to the Most 
High, in words which are repeated at 
the close of the following verse. For 
the phrase, ΠΣ ἽΝ oY, which means 
the whole day, comp. ἐξ ἡμέρας eis νύκτα, 
Eurip. Here. Fur. 503. oY is here 
used instead of 773, the beginning of 
the day. Coverdale : iz one day. 

13. 718, to be even, equal; in Piel, to 


make level, even; Arab. Vw, aquare, 


componere,—to compose one’s-self: in 
full, wa) mw, Ps. cxxxi. 2.. The king 
endeavoured to allay his fears and 
take rest during the night, hoping 
that the following morning would 
bring him relief; but when day re- 
turned, his malady raged with greater 
violence than ever. Comp. Job x. 16. 
While 3 corresponds to the 3 in 3, 
as in ver. 14, it likewise marks the 
apodosis. 

14, Ὅν DD, forms an asyndeton, as 
in TY wy, Hos. vi. 3; TY Wor, Hab. 
iii. 11. There is also an ellipsis of the 
> of comparison before the latter 
word, Comp. Jer. viii. 7, WP) DxD, 
where the use of the copulative shews 
that by Ὅν we are not to understand 
the swallow itself, as expressing the 
gyrations made by that bird in flying, 
but some other bird of passage. That 
it signifies the grws or crane, Bochart 
has satisfactorily proved, ili. 68—80 ; 


deriving it from the Arab. π΄: aufugit 
ad suos, quibus adsuevit. The Chald. 
has 372; Saad. ees , both having 


514 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP, XXXVIII. 


Mine eyes fail with looking upward ; 
O Jehovah! I am oppressed; undertake for me. 


15 What shall I say ? 


He hath both made a promise to me, and performed it. 


Τ will walk humbly all my years, 
Because of the bitterness of my soul. 


16 O Lord! by these men live ; 


And entirely through them is the life of my spirit ; 
Yea, thou hast restored me, and made me to live. 


the same signification. For 01, three 
MSS., and originally two more, have 
DD, Theod. ois, which Jahn states to 
be orientalium lectio. 'The word is ono- 
matopoetic,—expressing the sound 
made by the swallow. Hence also the 
Italian, Zisil/a. Both birds are noted 
for the circles and evolutions which 
they make in the air, and their noise 
when setting out on their journeys. 
This noise is here expressed by )¥52, 
which, though more applicable to the 
twitter of the swallow, may also de- 
scribe the call-note of the crane. See 
on chap. viii. 19. There is peculiar force 
and beauty in the comparison here 
made between the dying believer and 
migratory birds, about to take their 
departure to a distant and more genial 
clime. They linger in the scenes 
which they have frequented; but 
they are impelled by instinct to re- 
move. The plaintive note of the 
dove is again referred to, chap. lix. 11; 
Ezek. vii. 16. It occurs frequently in 
Eastern poetry. NY signifies fo engage 
tn behalf of another, pledge one s-self for 
him, and by implication, deliver him. 
15. Here begins the second half of 
the ode, in which Hezekiah attempts 
to give expression to the rapturous 
feelings of gratitude with which he 
was oppressed. When he was at the 
last extremity, he received the Divine 
promise that he should recover, and 
he had now experienced its fulfilment. 


As the verb, Arab. Jolo, Zo go slowly, 


is used, as here, in Hithpael, Ps. xlii. 
5, in the sense of walking in slow and 
solemn procession to the temple, some 
think that the pious king declares it 
to be his intention, as long as he 
lived, to go up to the house of God to 


give thanks for his deliverance. Thus 
the Chald. ‘Mi27p, Dts Mex, “T will 
worship and pay my vows before 
him.’ Schmidius, Vitringa, Hoheisel, 
Dathe, and Rosenmiiller, approve of 
this interpretation ; but it is decidedly 
forced ; as is also recogitabo, reputabo, 
reflect, meditate, &e., of the Vulg., 
Jerome, Lowth, and others. There 
seems rather to be in the word the 
expression of a pious resolution ever 
after to “walk humbly with God,” 
Mic. vi. 8, ὅν, on account of, or, induced 
by a consideration of the deep afflic- 
tion with which he had been visited, as 
the chastisement of his sins. It is the 
opposite of wz, which signifies to 
walk in a stately, independent man- 
ner; and is equivalent to ox 77, 1 
Kings xxi. 27. 

16. The pronominal affixes, 07 and 
17, being of both genders, express the 
number and diversity of the Divine 
benefits, and refer to these as the sub- 
jects implied in ὍΝ and Avy. Both v 
and 3 indicate the instrumental or 
efficient cause. Comp. Gen. xxvii. 
40; Deut. viii. 3. For 73, which is 
the reading of all De Rossi’s MSS, 
nine of Kennicott’s read 07; most 
probably the result of a grammatical 
correction. %22 is connected, accord- 
ing to the syntax, with 17 "7; the 772 
being merely interjected to give ease 
to the composition, as ™, Gen. vii. 6; 
ty, 2Sam.1.9; Job xxvii. 3. 2090, 
though put in the Fut. to mark the 
succession of the event, in reference 
to the past condition of the royal pen- 
man, is to be understood as a Preter. ; 
and the following Imper., ΠῚ, is, ac- 
cording to rule, to be rendered in the 
same sense. Comp. ™—%2m, Gen. 
xx, 7; MoM—nwy2, Josh. ix. 20, 


CHAP. XXXVIII.] 


ISATAH. 


315 


17 Behold! my bitter anguish is changed into ease ; 
And in love to my soul, thou hast delivered me from the pit of 


decay ; 


Fcr thou hast cast all my sins behind thy back. 
18 Verily, Sheol cannot praise thee ; 


Death cannot celebrate thee ; 


Those that descend to the pit cannot hope for thy truth. 
19 The living, the living shall praise thee, as I do this day ; 
The father to the children shall announce thy truth. 


17. Lit. “Behold! turned into 
soundness was my great bitterness.” 
That 9 is employed to denote a tran- 
sition or change from one state into 
another, see Gesen. Heb. Lex. (9, A) 3; 
so that there is no necessity, with 
Dathe, Cube, and others, to regard 
19, in either of the two instances in 
which it here occurs, as a finite form 
of the verb 1, to change,—a con- 
struction forced in itself, and at 
variance with the spirit of the ode, 
which requires the latter 1 to be 


simply a repetition of the former, for . 


the sake of emphasis. Comp. ver. 11 
and 19.—72 ‘Sb Pe is pregnant in 
meaning: “Zhou hast loved me, and 
effected my deliverance from,’ &c. 


Comp. the Arab. (jac, amore flagravit, 


adhesit. Nearly the same words occur 
Job xxxili. 18, ΠΤ Wp] Jw; but 
the signification of ΤΠ is so fully 
established, that we are not at liberty 
to change it into 727, as Chappelow 
‘suggests in his Note on this passage 
in Job. 23, consumption, decay ; from 
m3, fo fuil, waste, come to nothing. 


Arab. 58 trita et consumpta fuit 
vestis. coll do ert 9) et depascit 


eos vermis consumptionis. Hist. Tam. 
p. 322.—To cast any person or thing 
behind one’s back, is a mode of speech 
common among the Orientals to ex- 
press oblivion. See 1 Kings xiv. 9; 
Nehem. ix. 26; and comp. the Arab. 


ye , with », post tergum rejecit, obli- 
tus, non curavit res. r kalo a>, 


oblitus fuit, nec curavit rem necessariam. 


In reference to crimes, it means to 
forgive them. Thus Harir. Consess. 


XXXiv. Cell ws υ J yg Kies ts 
Ls ἰὼ, And I cast his deeds behind my 


back, though they were most atrocious. 
Comp. Micah vii. 19. Its opposite is 
to place any thing before the face, 
meaning to observe, or keep in view 
for punishment. See Ps. xe. 8, cix. 
14,15; Jer. xvi. 17; Hos. vii. 2. 

18. 388 and ny, the LXX. pro- 
perly interpret, of ἐν ἄδου, and οἱ 
ἀποθανόντες. Before ΠῚ repeat N%. 
The meaning of this, and similar 
passages in the Psalms, is not, that 
the departed have no conscious exist- 
ence, or active employments in 
another world, but that they take no 
further part in the concerns of the 
present life. ‘Those who have entered 
the invisible world no longer enjoy 
any opportunities of glorifying God 
upon earth; nor do they experience 
the fulfilment of his promises re- ° 
specting temporal good. Devoted as 
the pious Jews were to the temple- 
worship, to which 777 and 557 parti- 
cularly refer, they regarded a com- 
plete removal from it by death as a 
grievous calamity. Comp. Eccles. ix. 
10. Τοῖς γὰρ ἔτι ζῶσι τοῦτο ποιεῖν 
padiov? οἱ γὰρ τεθνέωντες ἔξω τῆς 
ἐμπορίας γεγένηνται, Theodor. on Isa. 
XxXxvili. 18. 

19. For ΤΠ, see ver. 11 and 17. 
One of Kennicott’s MSS., another of 
De Rossi’s originally, and the Com- 
plut. Polyg. read nx instead of ὅν, 
but the preposition is without doubt 
genuine,—being often used after verbs 
of speaking, publishing, &c. See Gen, 
xx, 2 3. Ps. di. 7; Jor. Σ]..16; 


810 


ISATAH. 


 [CHAP. XXXIX. 


20 Jehovah was ready to deliver me ; 
Therefore will we strike my stringed instruments 
All the days of our life in the house of Jehovah. 


21 


22 and apply it to the ulcer, and he shall recover. 


Now, Isaiah had said: Let them take a cake of dried figs, 


Hezekiah also 


had said: What is the sign that I shall go up to the house of 


Jehovah ? 


20. The 5 before the Infir. absolute 
is sometimes used to denote the con- 
tinuance of an action, Gen. ii. 3; or 
simply the Fut., Prov. xix. 8. 

21, 22. According to 2 Kings xx. 
7, 8, these verses should come in 
somewhere after ver. 6; and Lowth 
and Boothroyd insert them partly 
after the 6th, and partly after the 
8th ; but, from the peculiar manner 
in which they are worded, it seems 
pretty evident that they have not 
been placed here by transposition, 
and that they are not to be ascribed 
to the negligence of a transcriber ; 
but owe their place to Isaiah him- 
self, who, after inserting the ode of 
Hezekiah, recollected that what is 
here added was necessary to complete 


the narrative. myo, Arab. c rp ἐμ- 


-τὸ 


unxit et emollivit corpus oleo, to rub 
ointment into a wound, apply what is 
mollifying, &. From the particular 
mention made of pm, the ulceration, 
which appeared on the body of Heze- 
kiah, it has, with considerable pro- 
bability, been concluded that the 
disease with which he was afflicted 
was the plague. This disease is not 
only characterised by entire prostra- 
tion of strength, and great mental 
depression, but also by certain local 
symptoms, as buboes, carbuncles, and 
livid spots, which discharge offensive 
matter, and often reach deep into the 
system. The application of the cata- 
plasm was to produce suppuration, 
Hezekiah’s recovery was so rapid, that 
on the third day he was able to go up 
to the temple, 2 Kings ax. 5. , 


CHAPTER XXXIX. 


This chapter contains an account of the embassy sent by the king of Babylon, 
to congratulate Hezekiah on his recovery, 1; the ostentatious display 
which he made of his royal establishment, 2; his reproof by the prophet 
Isaiah, 3,4; a prediction of the captivity, 5—7; and the king’s acquies- 
cence in the announcement thus made to him, 8. 


1 AT that time, Merodach Baladan, son of Baladan, king of 
' Babylon, sent letters and a present to Hezekiah; for he had 


1. The name, 13 JINN, Merodach- 
Baladan, Winer and Von Bohlen de- 


rive from the Persic, yok Soyo» 


vir laudatus; but Gesenius, with 
_greater probability, regards it as a 


compound of JI, Mars, the great 
slaughterer, from wore? to die, corre- 
sponding to the Persic, ΟΝ , over 
throwing men, a hero; 7, Belus, the 


CHAP. XXXIX. | 


ISATAH. 


317 


2 heard that he had been sick, and had. recovered. And Heze- 
kiah was delighted with them, and shewed them his treasury, 
the silver, and the gold, and the spices, and the precious oil, and 
the whole of his armoury, and all that was found among his 
treasures. There was nothing in his house, or in the whole 


3 of his dominion, which Hezekiah did not shew them. 


Then 


came Isaiah the prophet to king Hezekiah, and said to him: 


What have these men said ; 


and whence came they to thee ? 


And Hezekiah said: They came to me from a distant country, 


chief god of the Babylonians; and 
Tx, Adon, Adonis, the Pheenician name 
of a deity. Two MSS. read 77893, as 
in 2 Kings, and a few have 7119, 
TWN, or ἽΝ το. Merodach is men- 
tioned Jer. 1. 2, as. one of the gods of 
the Babylonians, and the name was 
borrowed by their kings, as Lvi/- 
merodach, Mesessimordachus, Sitsimorda- 
chus. The ruler here referred to is 
the Mardocampad of Ptolemy, who 
reigned from the year B.c. 721 to 709 ; 
and is mentioned by the name of 
Marodach-Baladan in the passage from 
Berosus, preserved in the Armenian 
version of Eusebius’s Chronicle. He 
is there stated to have slain Acises, 
who had usurped the Babylonian 
rule after the brother of Sennacherib. 
See Gesen. zz Joc. Baladan, the father, 
Usher takes to be Belesis, or Nabo- 
nassar, from whom the celebrated 
Babylonian era took its name. Ac- 
cording to 2 Chron. xxxii. 31, the 
object of the embassy to Hezekiah 
was not merely to congratulate him 
on his recovery, but also to make 
particular inquiry respecting the ΠΕΡῚ, 
prodigy, which had taken place in the 
land of Judah. This prodigy Scholz 
thinks was the miraculous destruc- 
tion of the Assyrians; but it was 
more likely the horological pheno- 
menon, since this was immediately 
connected with the recovery of Heze- 
kiah, and must have been a subject 
of great interest to the astronomers 
of Babylon. The delivery of presents 
by the ambassadors was quite in ac- 
cordance with Oriental practice. 

2. 7322, his treasury, or store- 
house, in which were laid up the 
precious articles belonging to the 
crown. As 85) occurs Gen. xxxvii. 


25, and xliii. 11, in application to 
some kind of spice, it has been sup- 
posed by many that 752 15. 80 to be 
understood in the present passage. 
Thus Aq. τὸν οἶκον τῶν ἀρωμάτων 
αὐτοῦ. Vulg. cella aromatum. On the 
other hand, the Chald. “423 ™3, the 


Syr. ap Ded» the Arab. ew 
ale, and Saad. sploo Ly), take 


it to signify treasury ; and, from the 
enumeration immediately following, 
this would seem to be the right in- 
terpretation ; especially, as Ὁ, aro- 
mata, form one of the items dis- 
tinctly specified. The etymology 15 
uncertain; but that proposed by 
Lorsbach, Jena Algem. Lit. Zeit. 
1815, No. 59, which traces the word 
in the Persic, _ wal, depositum, 15 
the most approved. For the armoury, 
see chap. xxii. 8. The hereditary 
treasures of Hezekiah must have 
been greatly increased by the spoils 
of the Assyrian camp; but, instead 
of gratefully acknowledging to the 
Pagan ambassadors the hand of Jeho- 
vah in his deliverances, the vanity of 
his mind led him to make an osten- 
tatious display of his state, and thus 
to provoke the Divine displeasure. 
He seems likewise to have been desi- 
rous of commending himself to the 
favourable regard of the king of 
Babylon, with a view to an alliance 
with him against the Assyrians. All 
such foreign alliances being repug- 
nant to the fundamental principle of 
the theocracy, the prophet virtually 
denounces them in the following 
verses. 


R. R 


318 


ISATAH. [CHAP. XIx 


4 even from Babylon. Then he said: What have they seen 
in thy house? And Hezekiah said: All that is in my house 
have they seen; there is nothing among my treasures which 

5 I have not shewed them. Then Isaiah said to Hezekiah: 

6 Hear the word of Jehovah of Hosts: Behold, the days are 
coming when all that is in thine house, and what thy fathers 
have treasured up to this day, shall be carried away to 

7 Babylon: nothing shall be left, saith Jehovah. And of thy 
sons, who shall proceed from thee, whom thou shalt beget, 
shall they take away, and they shall be eunuchs in the palace 


8 of the king of Babylon. 


And Hezekiah said to Isaiah, Good 
is the word of Jehovah, which thou hast spoken. 


He said, 


moreover, There shall be peace and truth in my days. 


7. That the kings of Babylon prided 
themselves in having youths of noble 
and royal blood for attendants, ap- 
pears from Dan. 1. 3, ὅσ. oom, I 
have rendered in the usual way by 
eunuchs, Since this is strictly the 
meaning of the word, and most of 
those who were appointed to fill con- 
fidential stations about the persons 
of Eastern princes were emasculated. 
See Winer’s Realwort. art. “ Versch- 
nittene,” p. 760. How exactly was 
the prediction here given fulfilled! 
2 Kings xxiv. 12—16; Dan. i. 1—7. 
Yet nothing could be more impro- 
bable at the time of its delivery. 
The king of Babylon was himself a 
vassal of Assyria; and though, on 
occasion of the defeat of Sennacherib, 
he might cherish the hope of inde- 
pendence, yet no human foresight 
could have determined the conquests 
of Nebuchadnezzar, or the captivity 


of the persons and treasures of the 
house of David. 

8. Hezekiah has been unjustly ac- 
cused of egotism, or a blameworthy 
self-love, in the declaration which he 
here makes. It is nothing more than 
the expression of submissive acqui- 
escence in the Divine appointment, 
accompanied with a grateful joy, that 
undisturbed prosperity was to be 
granted throughout the remainder of 
his reign. The repetition of 128", aud 
he said, without its being added to 
whom the words were addressed, is 
supposed by some to indicate that he 
spake to himself, there being an 
ellipsis of 4222 ; but the ordinary con- 
struction of the passage is more 
natural. mx) dd, peace and truth, 
are not to be taken as a hendiadis. 
The former is used to signify pros- 
perity in general; the latter, the 
prevalence of true religion. 


CHAPTER XT, 


The portion of the book which begins with this chapter embraces the entire 
period from the restoration of the Hebrews from the Babylonish captivity, 


to the end of the Christian dispensation. 


The subjects more particularly 


treated of are the deliverance of the Jews from Babylon; their return to 


CHAP. XL.] ISAIAH. 319 


Judea, and the re-establishment of their ancient polity ; the appearance, 
work, sufferings, death, glorification, and reign of the Messiah ; the down- 
fall of idolatry, and the enjoyment of the blessings of salvation by the 
Gentiles ; and the final recovery of the Jewish people. Having, in chap. 
xxxix. 6, 7, predicted the captivity, Isaiah, with a view to console his 
nation, delivers the prophetic discoveries which, in perspective vision, 
he obtained of the remarkable interposition of Divine providence for 
their deliverance. To this subject he continually reverts in the course of 
the first twelve chapters, after digressing to touch on the coming of the 
Messiah, and the establishment of his kingdom, to which the restoration 
from captivity was to be subservient. His exhibitions of the character 
and government of Jehovah are the most sublime and magnificent to be 
found in Scripture. The superiority which he evinces to the narrow spirit 
of Jewish nationality, and the mere formal observance of the Jewish ritual ; 
and the readiness with which he avails himself of every opportunity to 
introduce the Gentiles to a joint participation in the benefits of true 
religion, argue the influence of principles, the full development of which is 
only to be found in the Christian economy. The Spirit of Christ, which 
was in him, not only disclosed to his view those future temporal events 
which affected his people, but pre-eminently, above and beyond them, “the 
sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow.” 

It has for some time past been fashionable among the German neologists to 
deny the authenticity of this section of the book, and to ascribe it to some 
anonymous writer, whom they suppose to have flourished about the time 
of the restoration from Babylon. The first who directed his weapons against 
it was Déderlein, who was followed by Justi, Eichhorn, Paulus, Rosenmiiller, 
Bertholdt, De Wette, and, more recently, by Gesenius and Hitzig. On the 
other hand, Piper, Beckhaus, Hensler, Jahn, Dereser, Greve, Moller, Kleinert, 
and Lee, have more or less successfully undertaken its defence. The refer- 
ences to their works will be found in the Christologie of Hengstenburg, 1 
Theil. 2 Abtheil., who likewise treats the subject with great ability; or in a 
Translation of this portion of it in the Amer. Bib. Repos. for Oct. 1831. See 
also Horne’s Introd. vol. iv. pp. 165—169. The objections taken from the 
historical circumstances of the prophecies; the impossibility of their being 
understood by the contemporaries of Isaiah ; the position which the writer 
assigns to himself among those who lived after the captivity; the minute- 
ness of the details; the want of reference by Jeremiah ; traces of Chaldee 
and later idiom ; and the diversity of style and phraseology, have been im- 
partially weighed by these authors, especially by Jahn, Moller, Kleinert, and 
Lee, and proved to be destitute of that importance which has been attached 
to them, and totally insufficient to overturn the position against which they 
have been brought forward. They are founded, partly and chiefly, on a 
positive rejection of prophetic inspiration, partly on a misinterpretation of 
particular passages, and partly on an undue pressing of a few minor points 
of style, the character of which is quite compatible with the general manner 
of Isaiah. Most of the hypotheses which have been framed in opposition to 
the authenticity, are perfectly arbitrary and gratuitous, and are not for 


920 ISATAH. [CHAP. XL. 


a moment to be confronted with the overwhelming mass of evidence which 
exists in favour of it. The principles which they involve are such as would 
not for a moment be listened to were they applied in the critical treatment 
of any Greek or Latin classic. The minutiz of idiom, &c., and such of the 
arguments of the opponents as appear in any degree plausible, will be 
noticed in the places in connexion with which they are adduced. 

The subjects treated of in chap. xl. are, the restoration from Babylon, 1, 2; the 
preparations for and actual appearance of the Messiah, 3—11; the incom- 
parable superiority of Jehovah to idols, 12—21,; his infinite wisdom and 
power displayed in creation, a ground of confidence to his people, 22—27 ; 
and the encouragement which the disconsolate Jews had to expect deliver- 
ance, 28—31. The majesty and sublimity of description which the prophet 
here displays, and the elegance and beauty of the diction in which it is 


clothed, are altogether unrivalled. 


1 ComFort ye, comfort ye my people, saith your God. 
2 Speak soothingly to Jerusalem, and declare to her, 


That her suffering is ended, 
That her iniquity is expiated ; 
That she hath received, at the 


1. The persons immediately ad- 
dressed are the public teachers of 
religion. The LXX. supply ἱερεῖς, 
priests; the Chald. 313, the prophets. 
Both may be included, since there is 
no reason for supposing, with Gesen., 
that there were no priests during the 
captivity. Ezra ii. and Neh. xii. prove 
the contrary ; and that they were in- 
structors of the people, see Mal. ii. 7. 
The repetition 1972 1912 gives intensity 
to the address. No objection can be 
more futile than that taken to the 
authenticity of this part of the book 
from such repetitions. Though the 
identical words, such as 728 °28, 737 737, 
may not occur in what all allow to be 
the genuine Isaiah, yet similar repeti- 
tions do. Comp. Ὁ τ, xxiv. 16; 
Di OW, ΧΧΥΪ. 35 WIN WW, xxix. 1; 
not to mention ™ ™, V2 V9, 7 Ὑπ, in the 
song of Hezekiah. The use of the 
pron, affix Dx, “your God,” en- 
hances the consolation conveyed by 
the address, 

2. ayy, to speak according to the 
heart, i.e. what is pleasing or delightful, 
is equivalent to 03, ¢o comfort, in the 
preceding verse. Comp. Zech. i. 13, 


hand of Jehovah, 


pam ὉΔῚ Ὁ O27, Dathe, dlande 
alloquimini. The joyful message is an 
announcement that the captivity into 
which the Jews had been carried, as a 
punishment for their sins, is ended. 
The verbs are all in the Preterite, to 
express the certainty of the future 
event. 823 1s properly military service ; 
from 8212, to go forth to war ; by impli- 
cation, hardship, privation, suffering, &c. 
Comp. Job vii. 1, x. 17; Dan. x. 1. 
PY TT means fo satisfy, or make compen- 
sation for sin, by enduring punishment 
on account of it, and has reference to 
the delight with which the person 
forgives against whom it has been 
committed. Though no real moral 
atonement can be made by sinners for 
their transgressions, yet, in a civil or 
national point of view, expiation was 
admissible under the Jewish economy. 
Comp. Lev. xxvi. 41, 48, and the fol- 
lowing clause of the present verse. 
0152, double, ample, full. Comp. Zech. 
ix. 12; διπλόος, 1 Tim. v. 17; διπλώ- 
care αὐτῇ διπλᾶ---κεράσατε αὐτῇ διπλοῦν, 
Rev. xvii. 6. Most expositors under- 
stand the recompense here spoken of 
to be the blessings conferred upon the 


CHAP. XL.| 


Double for all her sins. 


ISAIAH. 


521 


3 The voice of a herald in the wilderness : 
Prepare ye the way of Jehovah ; 
Make straight in the desert a highway for our God. 


4 Kvery valley shall be raised, 


And every mountain and hill made low; 
The crooked also shall become straight, 


And the rough places plain. 


5 And the glory of Jehovah shall be revealed, 
And all flesh shall see it together: 
For the mouth of Jehovah hath spoken it. 


Jews on their return; but the parallel- 
/ism forbids this construction, and 
shews that punishment is meant. 
They had suffered such chastisement 
as amply sufficed to clear the Divine 
character, and correct them of the 
great evil of idolatry. At the same 
time respect was had to a// their sins. 
Zwinglius, ‘ plenam castigationem.” 
Calvin, “ Prophetam nihil aliud velle 
constat quam Deum LEcclesiz \ sue 
miseriis satis superque esse conten- 
tum.” Coverdale, szffictent correction. 
mim ΤῸ 7722 is elliptical for Dia mb, fo 
take the cup,i.e. of punishment. See 
chap. li. 22; Jer. xxv. 15; Lam. iv. 
21,22. Perhaps 0°) may stand for 
05 ΟἿΞ, ὦ double cup, or one twice filled. 
The language is hyperbolical, and is 
designed to inspire the strongest con- 
solation. 

3—5. Contemplating the Jews as 
liberated from their captive state in 
Babylon, and again settled in their 
own land, the prophet announces the 
ministry of John the Baptist, in his 
character of herald and precursor of 
the Messiah, whose advent he predicts 
in the following verses. That the 
entire passage refers to the introduc- 
tion of the New dispensation appears, 
first, because the words are expressly 
quoted by three of the inspired evan- 
gelists as receiving their fulfilment in 
John, Matt. iii. 3; Mark. i. 3; and 
Luke iii. 4—6 ; and, secondly, because 
the way was to be prepared, not for 
the Jews, but for Jehovah himself. 
According to the LXX., Vulg., and 
N.T., 12792 is to be connected with 
xp, and not with 5. This division 


of the words is likewise supported by 
the accents,—Zakeph-gadol possessing 
a greater power of separation than 
Zakeph-katon ; and by the rule of 
syntax, which requires that impera- 
tives should precede any other word, 
at the commencement of animated 
discourse. That 27Y is not to be taken 
in the acceptation of Azll or acclivity, 
but in that of crooked, is evident, both 
from the primary meaning of "9, its 
opposite, and from the parallelism. 
The language of these verses is other- 
wise figurative; the images being 
borrowed from the Oriental custom 
of persons sent as pioneers before 
a monarch, to cut through rocks and 
forests, fill up hollows, and remove 
every impediment out of his way, 
especially in desert countries. See 
Diod. Sic. ii. 18; Arrian’s Alex. iv. 
30; Lowth, zz /oc.; and especially 
Horne’s Introduction, vol. ili. p. 94. 
Such was the character of John’s 
ministry. The wilderness in which it 
was exercised was only faintly emble- 
matical of the moral waste which the 
Jewish church presented at the time. 
Nothing less than a thorough μετάνοια 
and ἀποκατάστασις was required to fit 
her members for the reception of the 
Messiah. See Matt. iii. 1—10; Mark 
ix. 12. By mim 129 the LXX. appear 
to have understood the promised 
Saviour; adding at the end of the 
verse, τὸ σωτήριον τοῦ Θεοῦ; which 
Luke retains chap. iii. 6. This phrase 
is thus metonymically used, Luke ii. 
30, and in the Test. xii. Patr. pp. 542, 
614. Comp. John i. 14; 2 Cor. iii. 
18; Heb. i. 2. Such is doubtless the 


322 


6 A voice said, Proclaim! 


ISATAH. 


(CHAP. "KL. 


And I said, What shall I proclaim ?— 

All flesh is grass, and all its goodness as the flower of the field ; 
7 The grass withereth, the flower fadeth, 

For the breath of Jehovah bloweth upon it: 


Surely the people is grass. 


8 The grass withereth; the flower fadeth ; 

But the word of our God shall stand for ever. 
9 Get thee up upon a high mountain, 

Thou that publishest good news to Zion ; 


Raise powerfully thy voice, 


Thou that publishest good news to Jerusalem. 


Raise it; be not afraid ; 


Say to the cities of Judah, Behold your God! 
10 Behold! the Lord Jehovah shall come with might, 


right construction ; though it was un- 
justifiable in Lowth to adopt the 
words into the text. In the 5th verse 
the universality of the Christian dis- 
pensation is clearly recognised. The 
same formula of certainty occurring 
chap. i. 20, identifies the authorship. 
Comp. also chap. xxi. 17, xxii. 25. 

6. Wa, flesh, is used metonymically 
of all animated beings, but especially 
of man; hence Wat, or Wr, 
means all mankind, Gen. vi. 3, 12, 13; 
Πᾶσα σὰρξ, John xvii. 2; Rom. iii. 20. 
This and the two following verses 
contain another proclamation, designed 
to call off the attention of the Jews 
from their confidence in human an- 
cestry and merit, and direct it to the 
Gospel, as furnishing the only solid 
durable ground of hope. Comp. Matt. 
iii. 9; Johni. 13, vi. 63 ; Rom. ii. 28, 
29, iv.¥,° 2; 2.Cor iv. 16, 173 and’ 1 
Pet. i. 23—25, where the words are 
quoted and applied. 57, Gesenius 
understands to be grace, elegance, or 
beauty ; but it is rather to be taken in 
a moral sense, as expressive of that 
imaginary excellence, or righteousness, 
on the ground of which men are 
prone to advance a claim on the 
Divine favour, See Rom. x. 3; Ting- 
stadius, godhet. Comp. 7017 ὍΝ, chap. 
lvii. 1, where the word is used of 
genuine piety, or true moral excellence. 
The LXX. omit ora vs7 ἸῸΝ; and 


Koppe and Hitzig consider them to be 
a gloss; but the emphasis in 097, fhe, 
i.e. this people, meaning the Jews, 
shews that they were quite in their 
place. 

9. ΤῈ Mwin, Ke. are not in apposi- 
tion, as if Zion were the subject, but 
the genitive of object. The announce- 
ment was to be made /o the Jews, not 
by them. The feminine form of the 
participle is accounted for on the 
principle, that in the Oriental lan- 
guages terminations of that gender 
are not unfrequently employed in 
words denoting office, station, &c.; as 
np, @ preacher ; N78, a scribe; Arab. 


caus, successor; exxls, creator, &e. 


The vehemence here ascribed to the 
publishers of the message shews that 
females cannot be intended. The 
purport of the message is the appear- 
ance of God in the person of Messiah, 
which had been predicted ver. 3, and 
is here repeated for the sake of 
amplification in the following verses. 
The prophet employs the Divine 
names 77, ‘278, and OWN, specifically 
with this reference. Comp. chap. ix. 
6; Jer. xxiii, 6; Mal. iii. 1; Ps. xlv. 
6; Luke i. 15—17; Dr. J. Pye Smith’s 
Script. Test. vol. 11. pp. 33—43. 

10, 11. These verses exhibit certain 
attributes of the character and work 
of Christ ; such as power, tenderness, 


CHAP. XL.| 


ISATAH. 323 


And his arm shall rule for him ; 
Behold! his reward is with him, 
And his recompense before him. 


11 


He shall feed his flock like a shepherd ; 


He shall gather the lambs in his arms, 


And carry them in his bosom ; 


He shall gently lead the milk-giving ewes. 


12 


Who hath measured the waters in the hollow of his hand ; 


And meted the heavens with a span ; 
And comprehended the dust of the earth in a measure ; 
And weighed the mountains in scales, 


And the hills in a balance ? 
13 


Who hath meted the Spirit of Jehovah ? 


Or, being His counsellor, hath taught Him ? 


14 


With whom took He counsel, that He should instruct Him, 


And teach Him in the path of judgment ; 


Or teach Him knowledge, 


And make Him acquainted with the way of understanding ? 


and love. The 2 in pia is the Beth 
essentie. See on chap. xxvi.4. Tv 
is not here to be taken in the sense of 
work, but of the effect, reward, &c. of 
work. It is merely a synonyme of 
Ὁ. Comp. Lev. xix. 13; Ps. cix. 20. 
) is the Dativus commodi: which 
shews that the reward and recompense 
following are not those which the 
Messiah would bestow on others, but 
his own—what he had himself 
merited; the only sense, indeed, of 
which ποὺ will admit. Comp. chap. 
xlix. 4, 1111. 12; Phil. 11. 8—11; Heb. 
li. 9, 10. ‘mx and v2) indicate the 
absolute certainty of the rewards. 
The figures here borrowed from pas- 
toral life are exquisitely beautiful ; 
expressing, with the utmost elegance 
of language, the infinite care and 
tenderness of “the good Shepherd.” 
He not only exercises a sovereign and 
uncontrollable power for the defence 
of his sheep, John x. 28, but attends 
to the weak and feeble, tenderly 
carries the young in his bosom, and 
gently guides such as give suck, that 
they may not be overdriven. Comp. 
Gen. xxxiii. 13; Numb. xi. 12; 2 
Sam. xii. 3; Isa. xlvi. 3, 4. By oxo 
are meant lambs of such tender age as 


still to be dependent on the ewes for 
sustenance. Root ny, Syr. UY, to 


ἫΝ properly signifies fo 
give milk ; Arab. se, aluit familiam 


suam; kel, sustentavit ; le; lactavit. 

12. Now follows a sublime and mag- 
nificent description of “the True God 
and Eternal Life,’ who was to appear 
in the cities of Judah. The connexion 
proves that the same person is in- 
tended who had just been spoken of 
by the prophet. wv, Aq. τρισώμῳ, 
Symm. τρίτῳ, a measure, containing 
the ¢hird part of a larger one ; but of 
what quantity does not appear. That 
it must have been small, the spirit of 
the passage requires. The verse sets 
forth the wisdom and power of God 
in the disposition and sustentation of 
the different parts of the universe. 
Comp. Job xxxviii. 

13, 14. The knowledge of the Divine 
Spirit is boundless and independent. 
y2m seems to be taken in the same sense 
as in the preceding verse. Symm. 
ἡτοίμασε; the LXX.betteréyvw. The 
interrogative forms imply, as usual, 
strong negation. The words are in 
part quoted Rom. xi. 34, in application 


be new, young. 


524 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. 


15 Behold! the nations are as a drop of the bucket, 
And are accounted as the small dust on the balance ; 
Behold! He taketh up the maritime lands as an atom. 


16 


Yea, Lebanon is not sufficient for fuel ; 


Nor are its beasts for a burnt-offering. 


ily 


All nations are as nothing before Him ; 


They are accounted by Him less than nothing and void. 


18 


To whom then can ye liken God ? 


Or, what likeness can ye compare unto Him ? 


19 


The workman casteth an image, 


And the smith overlayeth it with gold ; 
The smith also beateth out silver chains. 


20 


He that is too poor to bring an oblation, 


Chooseth a tree that will not rot ; 
He seeketh for himself a skilful workman, 
To erect an image that shall not be moved. 


21 Have ye not known? 


to the unfathomable wisdom displayed 
in the arrangements of the gospel 
dispensation. . 

15. Godisimmense. In how familiar 
yet forcible a manner is this truth 
here illustrated! What we call the 
immensity of creation is nothing in 
comparison of Him. 19, a drop or 
tear ; from 9, to flow, distil. pre, Arab. 


ae » fricando trivit, comminuit in pul- 


verem, to pound to dust ; a particle of 
what is thus pounded. 77, in like 
manner, signifies the most minute 
particle or atom ; from 77, to beat into 
minute parts, Zwinglius, very forcibly, 
atomi umbra. For 0°, see on chap. 
xi. 11. The connexion here obviously 
requires the idea of large and extensive 
regions. 

16. To the Jews, who were familiar 
with the vast forests of Lebanon, and 
the abundance of animals which it sus- 
tained, the image here employed must 
have possessed great force. The Divine 
nature is such that no finite sacrifice 
is adequate to satisfy its claims on 
the guilty. Comp. Ps. 1. 10—13. 

17. carn, less than nothing, the idea 
of little being suggested by the subject. 
For other instances in which the ad- 
jective is omitted before the com- 


parative, see Noldii Concord. p. 466, 
(6.) Comp. for the force of the ex- 
pression, the ἐλαχιστότερος of Paul, 
Eph. iii. 8. Gesenius, Hitzig and 
Scholz render, from nothing ; but less 
aptly. Comp. chap. xli. 24. 

18. The Hebrew Future is often 
potential in signification. 

19, 20. If the entire creation is 
nothing in comparison of God, how 
absurd to invest a piece of metal, or 
a block of wood, with the attributes 
of divinity ; or even merely to regard 
such as an image of him! In the 
former of these verses is described the 
costly idol of the rich ; in the latter, 
that of the poor. ἩῪΝΣ is repeated in 
order to add to the force of the irony ; 
and Y72 is understood, only in the 
acceptation of beating, to express the 
making of chains. In many of the 
Egyptian idols holes are found, through 
which chains passed for the purpose 
of suspending them on the wall. }2027 
mann, lit. He that is impoverished as to 
a gift ; one who is so poor that he has 
nothing to present as an oblation, but 
may obtain a piece of wood, such as 
oak or cedar, fit to be an idol; and 
thereby evince his sense of religion. 

21. A spirited appeal to the in- 
struction which the Jews had always 


CHAP. XL. | 


Have ye not heard ? 


ISATAH. 


525 


Hath it not been told you from the beginning ?. 
Have ye not understood from the foundations of the earth ? 


22 


He it is, that sitteth above the circle of the earth ; 


The inhabitants of which are as grasshoppers ; 
That stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, 
And spreadeth them as a dwelling-tent ; 


23 


That reduceth the princes to nothing ; 


He maketh void the judges of the earth. 


24 


Scarcely are they planted; scarcely are they sown ; 


Scarcely is their trunk rooted in the earth ; 
And He seareely bloweth upon them, when they wither, 
And, like stubble, the tempest carrieth them away. 


Or may I be compared ? 
Saith the Holy One. 
26 


To whom then can ye liken me? 


Lift your eyes on high, and behold, 


Who hath created these things ? 


enjoyed respecting the Creator of the 
world, and the knowledge of his eternal 
power and Godhead, which all nations 
had more or less the means of ac- 
quiring, partly through tradition, and 
partly through the contemplation of 
the universe. Comp. Rom. i. 20, where 
ἀπὸ κτίσεως, corresponds to ὙΠ NVDiN ; 
before which supply the prepos, »from 
the preceding OND. 

22—24, Another sublime description 
of the transcendent majesty of Je- 
hovah. While unaffected by the re- 
volutions of the celestial system, and 
the meaner affairs of men, he regulates 
and controls the whole of his vast 
universe with infinite ease. From the 
use of 31, circle, or sphere, here, and 
Job xxvi. 10; Prov. viii. 27; it is 
evident the ancients had a knowledge 
of the spherical form of the earth. In 
passages, such as the preceding verse, 
where the foundations of the earth are 
spoken of, the language is obviously 
figurative, being borrowed from the 
idea of a building, the commencement 
of which is made by laying the foun- 


dation. ὑπ, Arab. 99» subtilis, valde 


minutus, properly signifies what is 
made small, minute, by pounding, as 


dust ; but it may also signify what- 
ever is small either in size or quality ; 
slender, fine, thin. It is here employed 
to denote a tent-covering of superior 
fineness, such as the rich Orientals 
spread over their courts in summer. 
Comp. Ps. civ. 2. As ἮΝ not merely 
indicates addition, accession, but also 
complement, fulness, &c., 92 7X ex- 
presses what is zot wholly done, 7. 6. 
scarcely : the negative being thus de- 
prived of its absolute force. Calvin, 
adeo ut. In such connexion, D3 is in- 
tensive. The passage teaches the utter 
frailty and imbecility of the oppressors 
of the church of God: a truth full of 
comfort to the Jews of the captivity, 
and to all who are the subjects of 
persecution. 

25. The sudden introduction of Je- 
hovah himself, as the speaker, has 
an admirable effect, compared with 
ver. 18. 

26. OPPY Divaww. Comp. div? ΝΠ. 
TPP, chap. xxxvii. 23. ED23, in num- 
ber, i.e. numerously ; as 23, power- 
fully ; 4223, gloriously, &c. ; and not 
as Rosenmiiller interprets, “ zumero, 
scil. certo suo et definito.” The re- 
ference is to the overwhelming number 
of the heavenly bodies. Thus Zwing- 


ss 


920 


27 


_ 29 


ISATAH. [CHAP. XL. 


He bringeth out their numerous army ; 

He calleth them all by name; | 

Through the greatness of his might, and the strength of his 
arm ; 

Not one is missing. 

Why sayest thou, O Jacob! and speakest, O Israel : 

My way is hid from Jehovah ; 

And, My judgment hath passed away from my God ? 

Hast thou not known? Hast thou not heard ? 

Jehovah is the Eternal God, 

The Creator of the ends of the earth ; 

He fainteth not, neither is weary ; 

His understanding is unsearchable. 

He giveth power to the faint ; 

And to them that have no might, 


He increaseth strength. 
30 


For the young men shall faint and be weary, 


And the choice youths shall utterly fall ; 


91 


But they that wait upon Jehovah shall gain fresh strength ; 


They shall soar on pinions like eagles: 
They shall run and not become weary ; 


lus, “ Numero, emphasis est pro 
magno numero.” The survey of the 
immense canopy of heaven, studded 
with innumerable worlds, which, in 
the brightness of an Oriental sky, the 
naked eye could command in the 
plains of Babylon, was calculated at 
once to produce elevated conceptions 
of the wisdom, power, and grandeur 
of the Divine Being, and to inspire the 
mind with unlimited confidence in his 
protecting care. The figure is military, 
taken from the muster which an army 
passes before its general, who has 
called it out to marshal and review it. 
From the immense celestial army not 
an individual is absent. Each star, and 
each sun, of the hundreds of millions, 
is always in its place. Considering 
the proneness of the ancient Eastern 
nations to worship the heavenly 
bodies, it may also have been the 
design of the prophet to shew the 
folly of such worship, by asserting the 
transcendent supremacy of Jehovah. 
27. From this verse to the end of 


the chapter, the prophet specially ap- 
plies what he had adduced respecting 
the majesty and power of God, to the 
disconsolate Jews in Babylon ; com- 
mencing with an expostulation on 
account of their unbelief. They had 
been so long in the power of their 
enemies, that they concluded they 
were quite overlooked by the God of 
their fathers. 

28. The Eternal and Immutable 
Creator is incapable of exhaustion, 
both as it respects power and wisdom. 

30, 31. Those who trust in their 
own prowess, and those who confide 
in Jehovah, are here contrasted ; as 
are also the different results of their 
reliance. 159M, shall acquire new 
strength, from *23, to pass out of one 
place or state into another; Arab. 


WANs, successor alicujus fuit, venit post 
alium; IV. instauravit, regerminavit ; 
Syr. Lau], the same ; ἀὰ nee , suc- 


cessor, the calif, or successor of Mo- 


CHAP. XLI.| 


They shail walk and not faint. 


hammed. It is chiefly used to denote 
transition from an inferior state to 
a better ; and specially to mental in- 
vigoration. Comp. chap. xli.1. The 
use of ὍΝ, pinion, from 728, to be strong, 
shews that no reference is had to the 
popular notion of the eagle’s renewing 


ISATAH. 


327 


his youth ; the points of comparison 
are his strength of wing and conse- 
quent rapidity of flight. The former 
idea, which many approve, appears to 
have been borrowed from the LXX., 


1 Gun \ 
πτεροφυή σουσιν ὡς AETOL. 


CHAPTER XLL 


To confirm the faith of the captive Jews in the true God, and evince the folly 
of idolatry, Isaiah now proceeds to predict the Divine commission and 
victorious conquests of Cyrus, 1—4; together with the consternation of 
idolaters at his approach, 5—7. He next encourages the Jews with as- 
surances of the presence, protection, and aid, of the God of their fathers, 
8—16 ; promises them every thing needful for their comfort and enjoyment, 
on their return through the desert, 17—20 ; gives a spirited, but powerfully 
ironical challenge to the idol-gods, to furnish proofs of their prescience and 
power, 21—24; and again announces the mission of Cyrus, the previous 
knowledge of which was derived, not from idolaters, but from Jehovah, 


25—29. 


1 LisTen in silence to me, ye maritime lands! 
Let the nations also put on fresh strength ; 
Let them draw near; then let them speak ; 
Let us come together to the trial. 

2 Who hath raised up from the east 


1. wy is the appropriate term for 
commanding silent attention. The point 
at issue was one of the deepest interest 
and importance, and claimed to be 
heard with breathless silence. Comp. 
Job xxxiii. 31. The LXX., who have 
ἐγκαινίζεσθε, have mistaken Ἢ for Ἢ, and 
given to ©19,a conjugation which no- 
where occurs. Aquil. κωφεύσατε. 
Theod. ovyjoare. For 0x, islands, see 
on chap. xi. 11. The inhabitants of 
Asia Minor and the Grecian islands 
are here specially intended. To these 


the phrase, PINT MzPp, the ends of the 
earth, ver. 5, also appropriately applies. 

2, The subject of the prediction is 
suppressed, as in ver. 25, and chap. 
xiil. 2; but that Cyrus is meant is be- 
yond all doubt. Comp. ver. 25; chap. 
xliv. 28, xlv. 1—7, 13, xlvi. 11. With 
no propriety can the description here 
given be applied to Abraham ; while 
the whole tallies most exactly with 
the Persian conqueror. Besides, the 
passage contains a prophecy of what 
was still to happen, not an account of 


328 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XLI. 


The just one, whom he hath called to follow him ? 
He hath delivered over nations to him, so that he hath subdued 


kings ; 


He hath made their swords as dust, and their bows as driven 


chaff. 


3 He hath pursued them; he hath passed on safely, 
By a way which he had never entered with his feet. 
4 Who hath wrought and done it ? 
He that calleth the generations from the beginning ; 


ancient events. What seems princi- 
pally to have proved an obstacle in 
the way of the true interpretation, is 
the occurrence of the term 77%, right- 
eousness, Which, it has been thought, 
cannot be applied to Cyrus. But 
it is not a little remarkable, that of 
all the virtuous princes of antiquity, 
he alone was thought worthy of being 
exhibited as a model of just govern- 
ment. “Cyrus ille a Xenophonte, 
non ad historize fidem scriptus, sed ad 
effigiem justi imperii.” Cicero ad 
Quint. Making every allowance for 
the colouring given to his character 
by Xenophon, still there is much 
force in the remark of Kocher: “non 
tamen eum proposuisset in exemplum, 
nisi virtutibus eminuisset.” Not only 
was he exemplary in private life, but 
his victories and conquests had for 
their principal object the vindication 
of law and justice. See Rollin, Book 
IV. chap. i. art. iii. § 3. He is even 
said to have been an object of the 
Divine love, chap. xlviii. 14. His de- 
struction of the Babylonian empire, 
and liberation of the Jews, were spe- 
cial acts of righteousness; and the 
abolition of idolatry, which, in a 
great measure, followed the success 
of the Persian arms, comes also under 
the same head. See on chap. xliv. 28 ; 
and xly. 1—4, 13. In this last verse, 
- Cyrus is expressly said to be raised 
up, ΡΊΞΞ, for righteousness, 1. Θ. to vindi- 
cate the cause of the Jewish captives, 
by inflicting punishment upon their 
enemies. Comp. Jer. 1. 15, 25, 28, 29, 
li. 10, 56. At p72, there is an ellipsis 
of Wx; or, it may be taken as the ab- 
stract for the concrete ΡΞ. Thus the 
Chald., Syr., and Vulg.— 31) 83, fo call 


to the foot of any one, means to engage 
another in his service, to order him to 
follow him and perform the duties 
prescribed. Cyrus was called to fol- 
low in the track marked out for him 
by Divine Providence. The? in mn 
belongs to God, understood. For 52, 
in the sense of following, comp. 1 Sam. 
xxv. 42; Job xviii. 11; Hab. iii. 5; 


Arab. Fe) us post illum ; statim e ves- 
tigio ejus. Pers. yr iol ye to 


follow any one. The suffix in i217 and 
inup refers to those whom Cyrus 
should attack, and is to be taken col- 
lectively. For the image, comp. Job 
ΧΙ, 27—29. The nations over which 
he obtained dominion were the Medes, 
Hyrcanians, Assyrians, Arabians, Cap- 
padocians, Phrygians, Lydians, Carians, 
Babylonians, &c. Cyropezedia, lib. i. 1. 

3. DW Way D|TyY graphically express 
the rapidity and success of the expe- 
ditions undertaken by Cyrus, and the 
extent of territory through which 
they were conducted. That against 
Croesus is specially in point. The 
omission of 3 before Οὐ is nothing 
uncommon in poetic diction ; so that 
the suppositions of Lowth are quite 
gratuitous. 

4. To the question, Ὁ, Who, &c., 
once more emphatically repeated, a 
direct reply is given. Between the 
verbs 92 and Mwy there is little differ- 
ence of meaning; only the former 
may describe the preparation for the 
result, and the latter the result itself: 
the one the work in operation, the 
other, the completion of it. See on 
Micah ii. 1. As frequently in Hebrew 
poetry, the object is not expressed. 


CHAP. XLI.| 


ISAIAH. 329 
I, Jehovah, the First, 

And with the last I am He. 

The maritime lands saw and were afraid ; 

The ends of the earth trembled ; 

They drew near; they came. 

They helped each other ; 

And one said to another: Be courageous. 

Yea, the carpenter encouraged the smith ; 

He that smootheth with the hammer him that striketh the anvil; 
Saying of the soldering: It is good; 

And fastened it with nails, that it might not be moved. 

But thou, O Israel, my servant, “ 

O Jacob, whom I have called, 


The seed of Abraham, my friend ; 
9 Whom I have taken from the ends of the earth, 
And called from its extremities ; 


For the sense in which Jehovah ap- 
propriates to himself, JTS) Fr, che 
First and the Last, see on chap. xliv. 6. 
Here the latter of these terms being 
changed into ὉΠ ΠΝ, seems in- 
tended, either to be more emphatic, 
the adjective being put in the plural 
to agree with Dx, and the nx retain- 
ing its intensively demonstrative sig- 
nification ; or, to teach, that, as God 
had called into existence the genera- 
tions of mankind from the beginning, 
so his existence would run parallel 
with that of all who should live in 
future time. Comp. }778 %, Ps. xlviil. 
14; ΟΣ πα, Job xviii, 20, where it is 
opposed to D2H77 ; Ὁ τ, contrasted 
with O72) MA Ws 73, Eccles. iv. 16; and 
DWN) ON ONY, Eccles. i. 11. While 
the idols had come from, and should 
soon again be reduced to nothing, the 
true God ever continues the same. 87, 


like the Arab. “Ὁ is used emphatically 


of Jehovah, to denote the singularity 
or uniqueness of his personal exist- 
ence. st qui est ; He alone is what 
he is: Gop. Zwinglius renders x17 72x, 
Ego sum ille qui est, and remarks: 
“Tanta vis est Hebraicz orationis, bre- 
vissimee quidem, sed potentissime.” 
5—7. INT} 381 is an elegant parono- 
masia. This and the two following 


verses describe the consternation of 
the idolatrous inhabitants of Asia 
Minor, and the islands and coasts of 
Greece, on learning the rapid successes 
of Cyrus ; and the increase of their 
national devotions, in order to obtain 
the protection of the gods. The enu- 
meration of the god-makers in their 
workshops is highly satirical, and quite 
in its place; though Houbigant and 
Kennicott imagined that the 6th and 
7th verses have been transposed from 
chap. xl. 20. Michaelis renders 077 
DvD, bellows-blower. 

8. For the different applications of 
14Y, TH? 72Y, see on chap. xlii. 1. It is 
here used of the Israelites, as worship- 
pers of thé true God. The transition 
in this verse is sudden and affecting. 
The correlatives heighten the effect. 
For the exalted title of Abraham, 
comp. 2 Chron. xx. 7; James ii. 23. 


a) Quis, the friend of God, is the 
common title of Abraham, among the 
Arabs, in the present day. 

9. The people of Israel being dis- 
tinguished from Abraham himself, and 
being directly addressed, the choice 
and call here spoken of must be 
those of the Hebrews in Egypt. 
Comp. Ezek. xx. 5; Hos. xi. 1. To 
that country τ ἘΝῚ PINT NP applies 


330 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XLI. 


And to whom I have said, Thou art my servant ; 
I have chosen thee, and will not reject thee: 


10 


Be not afraid, for | am with thee ; 


Be not dismayed, for I am thy God ; 


I will strengthen thee ; 


yea, I will defend thee ; 


Yea, I will uphold thee with my just right hand. 


11 


Behold! all shall be ashamed and confounded, 


That are enraged against thee ; 


They that contend with thee 


Shall become as nothing, and perish. 


Them that strove with thee ; 


They that fought against thee 


Thou shalt seek, but shalt not find 


Shall become as nothing and nought. 


13 


For I Jehovah am thy God, that holdeth thy right hand ; 


That saith to thee, Fear not, I will help thee. 


14 


Fear not, thou worm Jacob; ye mortals of mee 


I will help thee, saith eevee 
Even thy Redeemer, the Holy One of ret 


15 


Behold! I will make thee a threshing wain, 


Sharp and new, with double edges ; 
Thou shalt thresh the mountains, and beat them small ; 


with greater propriety than to Meso- 
potamia. Ὁ ΕΝ, properly signify the 
angles, joints, OY ‘elbows of the arm, and 
somewhat modify the meaning of Mp, 
ends, a8 occurring before. The expres- 
sion of a statement first positively 
and then negatively, for the purpose 
of making a strong asseveration, is not 
uncommon in Hebrew. Comp. for 
the Hellenistic usage, John 1. 20. 
10—14. While all the other nations 
should be in terror at the approach of 
Cyrus, the Jews had nothing to fear. 
Their God was with them, and would 
effect their deliverance. Though they 
were contemptible and helpless as a 
worm in the eyes of their haughty 
conquerors, yet these should be utterly 
destroyed, while the people of God 
escaped. 7a, vers. 10 and 23, in 
Hithpael, ‘signifies to look about for help, 
when one is in danger. By the “just 
right hand” of God, is meant his 
power, exerted in vindication of the 


rights of his people.  x1~'N9, being 
parallel to nyan, must also be taken 
in a contemptible sense, as meaning 
dead, inanimate, incapable of any poli- 
tical movement. Aq.re@vewres Ἰσραήλ; 
Theod. νεκροὶ Ἰσραήλ. So the Jews 
were regarded by the Babylonians. 

15, 16. By mountains and hills are 
meant governments, &c. See on chap. 
ii, 2. The prophecy received its fulfil- 
ment in the time of the Maccabees, 
John Hyrcanus, &c, when the Jews 
again became an independent state, 
and gained splendid victories over 


min, Arab. c ap tri- 


bulum ; a sledge or dray, drawn by 
oxen over the corn, for the purpose of 
threshing it. See on chap. XxXviii. 
27. nD 23, lit. master of numerous 
mouths ; well furnished with sharp 
points of stone or wood. The Hebrews 
call the edge or point of the sword, 
its mouth, on account of the destruc- 


their enemies. 


CHAP. XLI. | 


ISAIAH. 


551 


And the hills thou shalt make as chaff. 


16 


Thou shalt fan them, and the wind shall carry them away ; 


The storm shall also scatter them ; 
But thou shalt rejoice in Jehovah τ: 
In the Holy One of Israel shalt thou glory. 


17 


The poor and needy are seeking for water, and there is none ; 


Their tongue is parched with thirst. 


I, Jehovah, will answer them; 


I, the God of Israel, will not forsake them. 


18 


I will open rivers on the barren hills, 


And fountains in the midst of the valleys ; 
I will make the desert a standing pool, 
And the dry land springs of water. 


19 


Τ will place in the desert, the cedar, the acacia, 


The myrtle also, and the olive tree ; 
I will place in the wilderness, the cypress, 
The pine, and the larch together : 


That men may see and know, 


And consider, and understand together, 
That the hand of Jehovah hath done this, 
And the Holy One of Israel hath created it. 


tion which it effects. Comp. for the 
reduplicate form, nD 17, Ps. exlix. 


17—19. The destitute condition of 
the Jews of the captivity is compared 
to that of travellers in the arid deserts 
of Arabia, who are on the point of 


perishing with thirst, and know not y2j λα, &e.; Heb. ὙΠ, 


where to look for water. God pro- 
mises to relieve them with the most 
abundant supply of blessings. 77%). 
See on chap. xix. 5. Gesenius con- 
siders the Dagesh in © to be euphonic, 
in connexion with the pause. Comp. 
Jer. li. 30. Not only should the actual 
wants of the returning captives be 
abundantly supplied; they should, 
likewise, have the richest enjoyments. 
This latter prediction is couched in 
language borrowed from luxuriant, 
shady, and fragrant trees, which 
should beautify the desert. 777" and 
wwienm occur only here and chap. lx. 13. 


The former, Saad. renders, om plan- 


tanus indicus, and with him agree 
Kimchi and Sal. ben Melech ; compar- 
ing Song 1. 17, in the Targum. It 
seems rather, however, to be the pine; 


po in Arab. signifying perpetuitas ; 


splenduit ; 


that tree being one of the most shin- 
ing evergreens. The latter is in all 
probability the larch, and has the 
name given to it on account of its tall 
and erect form. Some think a species 
of cedar is meant, called by the Arabs, 


* τ . 
wo. The idea of doz-tree is now 
(Ons π 


quite abandoned. 

20. It has been doubted whether 
the nominative to the verbs here em- 
ployed be the Jews, or idolaters. The 
former is the more probable opinion. 
worm is elliptical for 29 ὃν 12°. Comp. 
ver. 22; and for ellipses of 35, Job 
KXxiv. 23, xxxvii, 15. 


332 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XLI. 


21 Bring forward your cause, saith Jehovah ; 
Produce your strong arguments, saith the King of Jacob. 


22, 


Let them produce them, and shew us things that were to happen; 


Let them shew us what were the former predictions, 
That we may consider, and know their event ; 
Or let them declare to us coming events. 


23 


Shew the things that are coming in the future, 


That we may know that ye are gods: 


Do either good or evil, 


That we may be dismayed, and be afraid together. 
24 Behold! ye are less than nothing, 

And your work is less than nought ; 

He is an object of abomination that chooseth you. 


21. The prophet now returns to the 
subject proposed at the commence- 
ment of the chapter, and challenges 
the gods of the heathen to produce 
evidence of their claims to divinity. 
moaxzy, Theod. κραταιώματα; Symm. 
ἰσχυρὰ ; properly a military term, sig- 
nifying strong works raised round a 
city for its protection: here used 
tropically of forcible arguments or proofs. 
Comp. Job xiii. 12. 0323 927723, your 
defences are defences of mud. 

22. The proof to which they are 
challenged is Divine foreknowledge. 

t is placed at their option either to 
adduce prophecies uttered by them 
in ancient times, that they might be 
compared with the events to which 
they referred; or, distinctly to an- 
nounce some future contingent events, 
ΤΙ νι, Theod. τὰ dpxaa; LXX. 
πρότερον. The heathen had_ their 
oracles ; but which of them could pre- 
tend to an ancient date, or minutely 
and clearly described ages beforehand 
events that actually happened? But 
as it was impossible for their devotees 
to produce any such prophecies, it 
was equally impossible for them to 
furnish a definite, unambiguous predic- 
tion of an event of public notoriety 
and interest in the still distant 
future. 

23. Besides repeating his demand 
for an unexceptionable prediction, 
Isaiah challenges the false gods to 
work a miracle in confirmation of 
their pretensions. The nature of the 


miracle he leaves them to choose. 
When they produced such a proof of 
the validity of their claims, it would 
be time to acknowledge their divinity. 
The language at the same time implies 
that so far were they from being able 
to work miracles, that they were ab- 
solutely incapable of doing any thing, 
either beneficial or destructive. Comp. 
Jer. x. 5. Gesenius is at some pains 
to attach to Tym: the idea expressed 
by the same form, 78107, 2 Kings xiv. 
8, 11; viz. that of engaging in mutual 
combat; but his attempt is unsatis- 
factory, and it is better to abide by 
the idea of mutual dismay, which is 
that conveyed by the verb in this 
very form, ver. 10, Its radical mean- 
ing is, ¢o look, to look anxiously for help. 
I prefer 1, the textual reading, to 
moan, that of the Keri, and point it 
x2}, and that we may be afraid. Thus 
xv and πὸ, occur together, ver. 10. 

24, A triumphant assertion of the 
nonentity of the heathen deities ! 
Οὐδὲν εἴδωλον ἐν κόσμῳ, 1 Cor. vill. 4. 
vox the Rabbins take to mean the 
same as TYE, ὦ viper, but unsuitably to 
the connexion. It is in all probability 
a corruption of Das. πον, the ab- 
stract for ποθὴ wy. Idolatry is always 
represented as peculiarly detestable to 
Jehovah. It is likewise so utterly de- 
basing in its influence on character, as 
to render its adherents, and especially 
its priests, objects of moral reproba- 
tion to all who fear him, 


CHAP. XLI.| 


ISATAH. 


333 


25 I have raised up one from the north, and he cometh ; 
From the rising of the sun he shall call upon my name ; 
He shall also come upon princes as upon mortar, 

And as the potter treadeth the clay. 


26 


Who shewed it from the beginning, that we might know ? 


Or aforetime, that we might say, It is right ? 
There was not even one that shewed it; 


Not even one that declared it ; 


Not even one that heard your words. 


27 


I first said to Zion, Behold! behold them! 


And gave to Jerusalem a messenger of good. 


28 


Τ looked, indeed, but there was none, 


Even among these, but there was no counsellor, 
That I might inquire of them, and that they might give a 


response. 
29 
Their works are nought ; 


Behold! they are all of them vanity ; 


Their molten images are wind and void. 


25. Having proved that the false 
gods could neither announce future 
events, nor work any miracle, Jehovah 
repeats the announcement already 
made, ver. 2; declaring the conquests 
of Cyrus upwards of a century before 
they took place, and even when the 
Medo-Persian empire had no exist- 
ence. In ver. 2, Cyrus is brought 
from the Hast; here from the North 
and the Zus¢ ; in obvious allusion to 
the united kingdoms of Media and 
Persia, over which he reigned. That 
Cyrus was induced to worship Jeho- 
vah, no one can doubt who reads his 
edict, Ezra i. 1—4, though it would 
not have answered the design of Xe- 
nophon to have noticed it. By 0220 
are meant the prefects, or deputies, 
in the Babylonian empire. X82) cor- 
responds to ns%}, and is not to be dis- 
turbed, as Le Clerc, Secker, and 
Lowth propose. 


26. None of the gods had given 
any intimation of the conquest of 
Babylon, either in the most distant, 
or in more proximate past time. ΡΣ, 
vight, means here, ἐξ is so in truth. 
The cumulative propositions, intro- 
duced by the repetition of 4X, are 
singularly forcible. 

27. What is denied of the gods, 
Jehovah vindicates to himself. He 
first announced by his prophet the 
approach of the conqueror. Before 
POX) is an ellipsis of V8, which is sug- 
gested by jax Ww29, in the following 
hemistich. 

28, 29. Every opportunity was given 
to the oracles, and those who consulted 
them, to commence their defence, but 
not a syllable was uttered. The un- 
avoidable conclusion was, that the 
whole system of idolatry was pure 
fiction and imposture. 


| 


334 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XLII. 


CHAPTER XLII. 


This chapter exhibits the person, character,-and-office-of-the.Messiah, 1—5 ; 
the extension of the blessings of the Gospel to the Gentiles, 6—12-; the 
intervening destruction of Babylon, 13—15 ; the return from captivity, 16 ; 
the confusion of idolaters, 17 ; the contemptuous rejection of the Messiah 
by the Jews, 18—20; Jehovah's delight in his work, 21; and the final 
punishment of the Jewish people for disobeying the Gospel, 22—25. 


1 BrHoLp my Servant, whom I uphold; 


1. In determining the application 
of this prophecy, it is necessary to 
ascertain the meaning of the phrase, 
mm tap, the servant of Jehovah. That 
Isaiah uses it in various senses, no one 
familiar with his writings will deny. 
It is applied to himself, chap. xx. 3 ; 
to Eliakim, xxii. 20; to the Jewish 


xlvili. 20; and to a distinguished 


| people, xli. 8, 9, xliv. 1, 2, 21, xlv. 4, 


Divine Legate, of whom a number of 
| things are predicated, which cannot 
} consistently be applied either to the 
| Jews as a body, to their prophets 
| collectively, or to any one of them in 
particular, xlii. 1—7, xlix. 1—9, 1. 5— 
10, li. 13—lii.; with which comp. 
Zech. iii. 8. That these last cited 
passages intimately cohere is admitted 
by most interpreters, how much so- 
ever they may differ in their views of 
the subject to whom they belong ; and 
certainly no one can accurately com- 
pare them with each other, without 
being struck with their cognate re- 
lationship, and the peculiarity of 
features with which they are marked. 
Respecting the application of the pre- 


Rosenmiiller, Hitzig, Maurer, and 
some others, apply the phrase to the 
Jewish people, or, at least, to the 
better or select part of them. Others, 
as Saadias, Koppe, Hensler, White, 
think that Cyrus ismeant. Abenezra, 
Grotius, Dathe, Déderlein, propose 
Isaiah himself; while De Wette and 


Gesenius imagine it applies to the 
prophets collectively. A very satis- 
factory refutation of these different 
opinions will be found in Hengsten- 
berg’s Christologie Erst. Theil. 2 
Abtheil. pp. 236—240, The reader 
may also consult the very able notes 
of Michaelis on the passage. That it 
applies exclusively to the Messiah has 
been maintained by the great body of 
interpreters, both ancient and modern, 
and more especially by Vitringa, Mi- 
chaelis, Lowth, v. d. Palm, Umbreit, 
Hengstenberg, Jenour, and Scholz. 
The principal reasons advanced in de- 
fence of this position are the following : 
First, the passage is directly applied 
to our Saviour by the inspired evan- 
gelist Matthew, chap. xii. 17—21; and 
part of the first verse is verbally 
adopted in the Divine testimony to 
his Messiahship at the Jordan, iii. 17, 
and on the mount of transfiguration, 
xvii. 5; Mark ix. 7; Luke ix. 35. To 
which add the reference made to the 
6th verse by Simeon, in his inspired 
testimony, Luke ii. 32. Secondly, this 
interpretation is that of theChaldee 


and Abarbanel, notwithstanding the 
narrowness of their hereditary notions, 
The latter writer scruples not to assert 
that all those who do not interpret the 
prophecy of the Messiah have been 
struck with blindness, 0%». Thirdly, 
the totality of character exhibited in 
the passage is such as to render it 
inapplicable to any but our Lord. 


CHAP. XLIL] 


ISAIAH. 


335 


Mine Elect, in whom my soul delighteth ; 

I have put my Spirit upon him ; 

He shall cause judgment to go forth to the nations. 
2 He shall not cry, nor raise his voice, 

Nor cause it to be heard in the streets. 
3 A bruised reed shall he not crush; 

And a glimmering wick shall he not quench : 


With no truth or consistency can it 
be said either of Cyrus, or of the 
Jews, or their prophets, that their 
commission extended to the spiritual 
emancipation of the Gentiles. See 
vers. 1, 4,6, 7. Fourthly, the subject 
to which the prophecy has respect, is 
obviously identical with that exhibited, 
chap. xix, 1—12. The person and office 
of the same individual are described 
in both. They equally insist on his 
mediatorial character, and the univer- 
sality of the dispensation of knowledge 
and happiness which he was to esta- 
blish in the world. Lastly, every 
predicate here specified most aptly 
applies to Christ. 

The transition was easy, from the 
temporal deliverance to be effected by 
Cyrus, to the spiritual salvation to be 
accomplished by the Messiah. }7 has 
there all its force as a demonstrative 
interjection, and marks the transition 
to a new subject, on which it fixes the 
attention ofthe reader. Ἂν, the LXX. 
render παῖς, as they do elsewhere, in 
upwards of three hundred instances ; 
and this Matthew retains, though he 
widely differs from them in the 
wording of his quotation. See Bloom- 
field on Matt. xii. 18 ; and comp. for 
παῖς, Acts iv. 27. Some have sup- 
posed that in Ἰακὼβ ὁ παῖς pov and 
᾿Ισραὴλ ὁ ἐκλεκτός μου, the names 
᾿Ιακὼβ and ᾿Ισραὴλ are a more recent 
interpolation ; but their insertion is 
quite in keeping with the manner in 
which many parts of this book are ren- 
dered in the LXX. ; the author having 
taken the liberty of introducing brief 
explanations, to render what he took 
to be the sense more perspicuous. 
See chap. i. 21, iv.4, lx.1. The Chald. 
renders ; ΦΊΔΙ YMA TAPS NPG Ty xT 
20 72, Behold my servant, THE Mus- 
SIAH, [ will cause him to draw near ; my 
chosen, in whom my word is delighted. 


Kimchi: moon yon wm, This is the hing 
MesstaH. Alschech: wot Jn KW, 
He is the king Messtan. Abarbanel : 
monn wn, dud this is the MESSIAH, Kc. 
See also Midrash Tillim in Raym. 
Martini Pug. Fid. p. 527. Our Re- 
deemer was the choice of infinite 
wisdom. He possessed a plenitude of 
mediatorial qualifications which ren- 
dered him the object of the Father’s 
complacence, and, in every respect, fit 
to undertake the work of human re- 
demption. This was in part the result 
of the superabundant gift of the Holy 
Spirit. Matt. ii. 16,17 ; Johni. 32— 
34, 111. 34. w bw, judgment, here, and 
vers, 3 and 4, is equivalent to ™n, daw ; 
and both mean the doctrine or insti- 
tution of the Messiah; the gospel 
dispensation. Εν, he will carry forth, 
or cause to go forth. Comp. 825, chap. 
ii. 3. True religion had been, for the 
most part, confined to the Jews. In 
the new dispensation; πάντα τὰ ἔθνη, 
all the 0%3, heathen nations, were to be 
brought under its influence. Comp. 
xlix. 6, 12, li. 4, 5, ii, 2—4; Matt. 
xxviii. 19 ; Mark xvi. 15. 

2, 3. These verses describe the meek 
and gentle character of the Messiah ; 
the noiseless and unostentatious mode 
in which the affairs of his kingdom 
should be conducted ; and the tender 
compassion which he would exercise 
towards the dejected and helpless. 
Comp. chap. lxi. 1—3; Matt. xi. 28— 
30. It was the retiring conduct of 
our Lord, which led Matthew to quote 
the words of the prophecy as receiving 
their fulfilment inhim, smtp, LXX. de. 
λίνον, flax, or linen; here a wick made 
of such material. 193, to be feeble, weuk, 
pale, dim, peculiarly expressive of a 
lamp just about to expire. LXX. 
καπνιζόμενον. Matt. τυφόμενον. Aq, 
Symm., Theod., ἀμαυρὸν. MP8? must 
either mean dy, i.e. by means of truth, the 


336 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XLII. 


For permanence he shall cause judgment to go forth. 
4 He shall not glimmer, neither shall he be bruised, 

Till he have established judgment on the earth, 

And the maritime lands have waited for his law. 


5 Thus saith the God, Jehovah, 


That created the heavens, and stretched them out ; 
That spread forth the earth, and its productions ; 
That giveth breath to the people upon it, 
And spirit to them that walk on it. 
6 I, Jehovah, have called thee for righteousness ; 
I also will take hold of thy hand ; 
Yea, I will preserve thee, and appoint thee for a covenant to 


the people, 


> denoting the dative of instrument ; 
or, for a permanence ; i.e. the dispen- 
sation which was to continue, in op- 
position to that of Moses, which was 
to cease. The root is ox, in Niph. Zo 
be stable, durable, permanent. Thus 
Matt. ἑως ἂν ἐκβάλῃ εἰς νῖκος τὴν κρίσιν ; 
where εἰς νῖκος is used Hellenistically, 
as by the LXX. in Job xxxvi. 7; 2Sam. 
11. 26, for N22, for ever ; 22, perpetuity, 
eternity. Comp. Hab. i. 4. 

4. The verbs 772 and yy are here 
repeated with fine effect, in appli- 
cation to the Messiah himself. Mild 
and gentle as he would be towards the 
broken-hearted and desponding, no 
power should depress his spirit, im- 
pede his progress, obscure his glory, 
or thwart his purpose. The negatives 
in this and the preceding verses are 
intended strongly to affirm the con- 
trary. For the form j7v, comp. 77, 
Ps. xci. 6. ἣν Prov. xxix. 6; which 
are referable to 17 and jn, as yv is to 
yz. This verb is here used intransi- 
tively, as in Eccles. xii. 6. There can, 
I think, be little doubt, that ἐπὶ τῷ 
ὀνόματι αὐτοῦ, the present reading of 
the LXX., was originally, ἐπὶ τῷ νόμῳ 
avrov. Thus the other Greek versions: 
καὶ ἐν τῷ νόμῳ αὐτοῦ ἔθνη ἐλπιοῦσι. 
Matt., however, retains ὄνομα, as suffi- 
cient for his purpose. See Bloomfield 
in loc. For 0x, in the sense of remote 
western countries, see on chap. xi. 11. 
In such connexions as the present, it is 
almost synonymous with 3, zations ; 
yet not without a more special re- 


ference to those of Europe and other 
western parts, in which Christianity 
has most prevailed. 

5. Such descriptions of the exclusive 
claims of Jehovah to be believed in and 
obeyed, frequently occur in passages 
which treat of the folly or downfal of 
idolatry. They form an appropriate 
introduction to what follows. Among 
other effects to be produced by the 
establishment of the New Covenant, 
was the conversion of idolaters to the 
service of the true God. The ° in 
oP is not the sign of the plural, but | 
merely a substitute for the radical 7; | 
as jaye, Ezek. i. 5. 

6, 7. Jehovah now addresses himself 
directly to the Messiah. The language 
resembles that employed respecting 
Cyrus, chap. xlv. 13; but what is 
otherwise here predicated can with no 
propriety be applied to that monarch. 
ΡΊΞΞ, with or for, i.e. furnished with, 
prepared to bestow righteousness. 
Maurer: “ cum justitia sc. mea, ἢ. 6. ut 
cum justitia mea venias.” For this 
signification of 3, see on chap. vill. 16. 
The δικαιοσύνη introduced by the 
Messiah, Dan. ix. 24, called, Rom. 1.17, 
ii. 21, 22, δικαιοσύνη Θεοῦ, iS very 
different from that which the Persian 
conqueror brought to Babylon. It is 
that, without which there can be no 
enjoyment of the other blessings 
specified in the prophecy. ΓΒ, Cove- 
nant, is used elliptically, for m2 4x7, | 
the Messenger, or Agent of the Covenant, 
Meoirns ; and is employed as a per- | 


CHAP. ΧΙ11.]} 


For a light to the nations. 
7 To open the blind eyes ; 


ISAIAH. 


337 


To bring the prisoners out of confinement ; 
Out of the prison-house them that sit in darkness. 
8 Iam Jehovah; this is my name ; 
And my glory will I not give to another, 
Nor my praise to graven images. 
9 As to the former predictions, behold! they have come to pass ; 


And new events I declare ; 


Before they spring forth I publish them to you. 


10 


Sing to Jehovah a new song; 


His praise at the extremity of the earth ; 
Ye that go down upon the sea, and its fulness ; 


sonal title of the Messiah, because he 
was sent to be the medium through 
which the blessings conveyed by it 
were to flow to mankind. Some ren- 
der, Covenant-victim ; but this idea, 
though implied in the Scripture doc- 
trine of the New Covenant, is not 
suggested by the word itself. ody ma, 
a Covenant of the people, is the Genitive 
of object, just as Ὁὴ 3 Nx, light of the 
nations, is. The Covenant was not one 
which the people already possessed, 
but one that was to be made with 
them through the mediation of the 
Messiah. Comp. chap. xlix. 8, lv. 3; 
Jer. xxxi. 31: Mal. ii. 1 ; Heb. viii. 6, 
kpeitroves διαθήκης μεσίτης, 8—13, ix. 
15, διαθήκης καινῆς μεσίτης. OY, people, 
and 0%3, zations, are here used anti- 
thetically, as in chap. xlix. 6, 8, to 
denote the Jews, as God’s peculiar 
people, and the other nations of the 
earth by which he had not been 
known or served. The benefits of 
redemption were not to be confined to 
the former, but were to be extended 
throughout the world. ix, as φῶς, 
John i. 8, 9, viii. 12, is employed 
metaphorically for the author of light, 
and designates the Messiah as the 
Great Moral Teacher, the Author not 
only of spiritual illumination, but of 
deliverance from the impurity and 
misery of sin. Though the two 
epithets are used distinctively in the 
antithesis, it is not meant that the 
Jews alone were to enjoy the privileges 
of the New Covenant, nor that the 


heathen were to enjoy the light to the 
exclusion of the Jews: they were to 
have both in common, only the cove- 
nant belonged primarily to the latter, 
Acts ili. 25. 

8. Before x, supply 98 from ver. 5. 
Comp. O78 ovoRX, Exod. xx. 3. The 
Divine and Incommunicable name, 
mm, is here used in reference to its 
peculiar import : THE SreLr-ExisTent 
AND IMMUTABLE. Comp. Exod. iii. 14; 
Hos. xii. 5. 

9. The nists were the predictions 
previously delivered, respecting the de- 
struction of the Assyrians, &c.; the 
mw are those which had, in part, 
been delivered by the prophet, in the 
preceding part of this chapter, re- 
specting the Messiah, and the dispen- 
sation which he was to establish. 
ΤΌΣ DW. is a botanical metaphor, 
aptly introduced to shew that no ap- 
pearances existed which gave the least 
indication of the things predicted. 
They were, as it were, hid under 
ground from the sight of mortals. 

10. This and the two following 
verses describe the universal joy which 
the publication of the Gospel should 
occasion. Benefits so transcendent as 
those which it bestows, called for 
higher -strains of praise than any 
which had previously been conferred. 
Carmina non prius audita, Horace. For 
WIT VY, comp. Ps. xevi.1, xeviii.1. Both 
these Psalms, and that which inter- 
venes, are strikingly parallel in phrase- 
ology to the present passage. The 


338 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XLII. 


The maritime lands, and their inhabitants. 


11 The desert and its towns shall raise their voice ; 
The villages that Kedar inhabiteth ; 
The inhabitants of Sela shall sing ; 
From the summit of the mountains shall they shout. 
12 They shall render glory to Jehovah, 
And declare his praise in the maritime lands. 
13 Jehovah shall go forth like a hero; 
Like a warrior shall he rouse his zeal ; 
He shall cry aloud ; he shall call to battle: 
He shall shew himself mighty against his foes. 
14 I have long been silent; 
I have held my peace ; I have contained myself : 
Like a woman in child-birth, I will ery out ; 
1 will pant and breathe at once. 
15 1 will lay waste mountains and hills, 
And dry up all their herbage ; 
I will also turn the rivers into habitable lands, 
And dry up the pools: 
16 And will lead the blind by a way which they knew not; 


In paths which they knew not will I conduct them: 


subject is the same,—the abolition of 
idolatry under the reign of the Mes- 
siah. Lowth’s proposed change of 
DT Ny into oy, YY, or JY, 15 opposed 
by its correlate O»8. The Phoenician 
merchants, and the inhabitants of the 
transmarine regions in the west, are 
here meant. Instead of 77», fifteen 
MSS. and origin. eight more, read 7¥73, 
and De Rossi’s Cod. 109, mentions 
that others read thus. 

11. At Ἰνὼ is an ellipsis of Dp. As 
Kedar means the Arabs generally, 
chap. xxi. 16, and is used as a proper 
name, consistency of interpretation 
requires that », Sela, should be 
viewed in the same light, as denoting 
the city of Petra, to the south of the 
Dead Sea. See on chap. xvi.1. The 
inhabitants of these regions are se- 
lected to represent the Kast, as those 
living in countries down the Mediter- 
ranean had been to represent the 
West. 737 means the great Arabian 
desert, and its DY, the towns which are 
found in different parts of it. 


13. The prophet here returns to the 
subject of the captivity. The lan- 
guage is military, and powerfully ex- 
presses the ardour with which a war- 
rior rushes upon the enemy. ΠῈΣ, 


Arab. - - 72 clare exposuit ; 11. aperte 


divit rem; in Hiph. to give a loud shout 
or cry, such as warriors do when en- 
tering into battle, for the purpose of 
inspiring each other with courage. 

14. The metaphors are now bor- 
rowed from a female in her pains, and 
most significantly express the impa- 
tience with which Jehovah waited to 
give birth to his purpose respecting 
Babylon. The interrogative turn 
which some give to the former half 
of the verse is unnatural. Dx some 
derive from 09%, to lay waste; but it 
is more in accordance with the images 
here employed to refer it to Ὁ), fo 
breathe strongly, pant for breath. ‘Thus 
AN, fo blow, or breathe hard. 

15, 16. The Babylonian empire, and 
every other obstacle that prevented . 


CHAP. XLII.] 


ISATAH. 


339 


I will turn darkness into light before them, 
And rugged places into a plain: 
These things will I do for them, and will not forsake them. 


17 


They are turned back, they are utterly confounded, 


That confide in graven images ; 


That say to molten images : 
Ye are our Gods. 


18 Hear, ye deaf! 


And, ye blind! look, that ye may see. 


19 


Who is blind but my Servant? 


Or deaf as my Messenger whom I will send ? 


the happy return of the Jews to their 
own land, were to be destroyed. In- 
stead of Dx, many critics, after Hou- 
bigant, would read ΘῈ, but quite 
unnecessarily. Besides, the latter 
word signifies the inhabitants of arid 
regions, never the regions themselves. 
See on chap. xiii. 21. Nothing could 
have been more unexpected than the 
mode of deliverance from Babylon. 
It was manifestly the hand of God. 
The imagery is bold and sublime. 
Comp. chap. xli. 15—19. The con- 
struction Dn Dy is not uncommon. 

17. A description of the disappoint- 
ment experienced by the idolaters of 
Babylon, when they found that their 
gods had been unable to protect them 
from Cyrus. 

18. The prophet here turns abruptly 
upon his countrymen, who enjoyed 
- abundantly the means of religious in- 
struction after the restoration, more 
especially during the ministry of our 
Lord, ver. 20, but who were obsti- 
nately stupid and inattentive, and calls 
upon them to regard the Divine mes- 
sage. Comp. chap. xliii. 8 ; Matt. xv. 
14; Mark iii. 5. 

19. Most interpreters apply these 
words to the Jewish people, addressed 
both in the preceding and the follow- 
ing verse: but their interpretation is 
clogged with insuperable difficulties. 
Nowhere in scripture is that people 
spoken of as the Tim 4X, Messenger of 
Jehovah. Whenever they are called 
his servant, reference is had to their 
worship and obedience to his laws,— 
not to their executing a commission 


to others. Besides, with no propriety 
could the term 03% be applied to 
them. We are told, indeed, what is 


perfectly true, that pres Moslem, 
oe ee Mosleman, whence our Mussul- 


man, signifies one who is devoted to 
the service of God, who obeys him, 
and submits to his will; but even if 
it were allowable to transfer the Mo- 
hammedan acceptation of this Arabic 
term to the Hebrew, nothing would be 
gained. The Jews were distinguished 
for any thing rather than devotion to 
the will and service of Jehovah. A 
more appropriate rendering, in appli- 
cation to them, would be that of 
recompensed, punished—the verb 0d» 
signifying, fo requite, retribute: but 
this would ill comport with the fore- 
going terms. The signification, friend, 
ally of God, proposed by Gesenius, is 
equally irrelevant. Abraham was so 
called, but never the Jewish nation. 
The construction, to whom I have sent 
my messenger, which is that of the 
Vulg., Chald., Saadias, Lowth, and, 
others, Gesenius justly rejects. The 
language I consider ironical, and de- 
signed to shew, that such would be 
the light in which the Jews would re- 
gard the Messiah. When accused of 
unbelief, they retort: “ Who can 
listen to such a messenger? He is 
blind to all the prospects of earthly 
glory, which our prophets have taught 
us to cherish; he is deaf to all our 
pretensions on the score of legal 
righteousness.” Comp. chap. liii. 1. 


340 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XLII. 


Who is blind as the Perfect One ? 
Blind as the Servant of Jehovah ? 


20 


Thou hast seen many things, but hast not observed them ; 


Having the ears open, but heard nothing. 


21 


Jehovah is well-pleased for the sake of his righteousness ; 


He shall magnify the law, and render it glorious. 


But this is a people spoiled and plundered ; 


All of them are bound in dungeons, 


And hid in prison-houses ; 


They have become a spoil, and there is no deliverer ; 
A plunder, and no one saith, Restore. 


23 


Who among you will give ear to this ? 


Attend, and hear for the future ? 


24 Who delivered up Jacob to be a spoil, 


To our Lord all the epithets here em- 
ployed most aptly apply. He was the 
Father’s Servant; the Messenger whom 
he was to send; the Perfect One. The 
last term, 0202, Symm. renders, ὁ 
τέλειος; Kimchi, 9m, perfect; and 
Abenezra regards it as synonymous 
with pz, righteous. The signification, 
delivered up, betrayed, might be sug- 
gested, comp. Josh. xi. 19; but that 

‘of perfect is best established. Instead 
of 1», blind, repeated at the end of the 
verse, two MSS. and Symm. read 17, 
deaf, of which Houbigant, Lowth, and 
Déderlein approve ; but there is sin- 
gular force in the repetition, which is 
beyond doubt genuine. 

20. The blind Jews are now ad- 
dressed as a body. They had been 
favoured with the highest advantages; 
numerous and illustrious miracles 
were performed by our Lord before 
their eyes, but they heeded them not. 
Their ears were open to their phari- 
saical teachers, but they were unwill- 
ing to listen to him. niu, the Keri, 
though numerously supported by MS. 
authority, is most likely, after all, an 
emendation, proposed for the purpose 
of rendering the word conformable 
to the following Infin. 072 ; yet comp. 
ninw, chap. xxi. 18 ; nis, Hos. x. 4. 
Symm. εἶδες πολλὰ ; LXX. εἴδετε πλε- 
ονάκις. The same may be said of aun, 
in the Second Person instead of the 
Third. 


.- 


21. The antecedent to the pronom. 
affix in Wiz, His righteousness, is the 
Illustrious Servant and Messenger of 
Jehovah. Thus the LXX. ἵνα δικαιωθῇ; 
Symm. ἵνα δικαιώσῃ αὐτὸν ; and simi- 


larly the Chald., Vulg., and Saad. ΥὙ8π|, 


signifies to end, incline, Arab. a 


Jlexit, inflexit ; to be inclined, favourable 
towards a person ; be delighted, pleased. 
It is here used of the propense dispo- 
sition of God to bestow blessings on 
the guilty, in consideration of the 
righteousness of the Messiah. The 
Jews might reject him, as predicted 
in the preceding verses, but his work 
should not be fruitless. Comp. chap. 
xlix. 5. The mim you, chap. lui. 10, 
should prosper in his hand. The 
nominative to the verbs 712 and Ww 
is the Messiah, understood. For the 
sense, comp. Matt. v. 17; Rom. iii. 31, 
vii. 12, vil. 4, x. 4; Gal. iii. 18. 

22. From this verse to the end of 
the chapter we have a pathetic argu- 
mentative description of the miserable 
circumstances to which the’ Jews 
should be reduced, in consequence of 
their rejecting the Saviour. M57 is 
the historical Infinitive of πῇ, oa 
may either be rendered, the young men ; 
or, ἐμ holes. The latter is preferable, 
on account of the parallelism. By 
Tis meant a subterranean prison. 

24, Not is used per κοίνωσιν,--- 
the prophet identifying himself with 


CHAP. XLIII.] ISATAH. 341 


And Israel to the plunderers ? 
Was it not Jehovah? He against whom they had sinned ; 
In whose ways they were unwilling to walk ; 
And whose laws they did not obey. 

25 Therefore, he hath poured upon him the heat of his anger ; 
And the fierceness of war ; 
It hath even kindled around him, yet he perceiveth it not; 
Yea, it burneth him up, yet he layeth it not to heart. 


his nation. The LXX. and Chald. instance of the stat. absol. pro constr. 

read NOM, or a genitive of apposition : heat which 
25. For 727, one of Kennicott’s is his anger,i.e. his hot anger. 

MSS. reads non. ‘58 727 may be an 


CHAPTER XLII. 


The prophet resumes the subject of the restoration from Babylon and other 
countries, and adduces several grounds of comfort and encouragement to 
the pious, 1—7 ; while he exposes the guilt of such of the Jews as obsti- 
nately persisted in unbelief, 8. He then, by an easy transition, addresses 
himself to the idolaters, challenging them to produce a single instance of 
prescience on the part of their gods, 9; appeals to the liberated Jews, and 
to the Messiah, for the truth of the fact, that there was no God but Jehovah 
alone, 10—13 ; and again announces the interposition at Babylon, 14, 15 ; 
which he illustrates by a reference to the deliverance at the Red Sea, 16, 17. 
The former, however, was to be the more memorable of the two, 18—21. 
He then shews that the deliverance of the Jews was not owing to ceremonial 
offerings, &c., but to the free grace of Jehovah, pardoning their sins, 22— 
26 ; and the chapter concludes with a statement of the causes of the capti- 
vity, 27, 28. 


1 Burt now, thus saith Jehovah that created thee, O Jacob ! 
And He that formed thee, O Israel ! 


1. Creation and redemption are here, figuratively, to give existence to 
here to be understood in a national what the name or person imports. 
sense, ὉΔῚ ΝῊ primarily means, fo Comp. chap. i. 26; Exod. xxxi. 2; 
call a person by enouncing his name; Isa, xlv.3,4. Ina higher sense, when 


teu 


942 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP, XLII. 


Fear not, for I have redeemed thee ; 
I have called thee by name ; thou art mine. 

2 When thou passest through the waters, I will be with thee ; 
And through the rivers, they shall not overflow thee ; 
When thou walkest through the fire, thou shalt not be burned ; 
Neither shall the flame consume thee. 


3 For I, Jehovah, am thy God, 


The Holy One of Israel, thy Saviour ; 
I have given Egypt for thy ransom, 


Cush and Seba im thy stead. 


4 Because thou wast precious in my sight, 


Thou hast been honoured ; 


And because 1 loved thee, I have given men in thy stead, 
And nations instead of thy life. 


5 Fear not, for I am with thee; 


God is the subject, it means fo call 
φρο, or invoke him, with special re- 
ference to his name, z.e. his revealed 
character. Gen. iv. 26, e¢ freq. 

2. Images of the greatest troubles 
and dangers, and promises of perfect 
security. 

3. 183, from ἝΞ 


=) 


to cover, overlay with 
acovering, Arab. ps 5 pe texit, operuit 


rem; and the latter, condonavit pec- 
catum ; signifies ransom-money, λύτρον, 
a compensation paid for expiation and 
deliverance. Comp. Exod. xxi. 30, 
xxx. 12. Its substitutionary or vica- 
rious character is confirmed by ΤΏΙ, 
in thy stead, in the following clause. 
The ransom consisted in the countries 
here specified, with which the Per- 
sians were rewarded for liberating the 
Jews from Babylon. They received 
no compensation from the Jews them- 
selves ; but under Cambyses, they 
pushed their conquests into Africa, 
subdued Egypt, and penetrated as far 
as Ethiopia and Meroé. For 3, Cush, 
see chap. xi. 11. By x20, Seda, is 
meant the celebrated sacerdotal state 
of Meroé, situate in the fruitful penin- 
sula formed by the rivers Astapus and 
Astaboras, or Tacazze, and now con- 
stituting part of the kingdom of 
Senaar, in Nubia. The city of Meroé 
was famous for its commerce, riches, 


and temples, one of which was of 
gold, and particularly noted for the 
priests having been murdered in it, in 
the third century before Christ, by 
Ergamenes the king, who thus ren- 
dered himself independent of the 
priesthood. Numerous remaining 
temples, pyramids, colossuses, and 
sepulchral monuments, attest its 
ancient magnitude and _ splendour. 
Some of the most remarkable ruins 
are those of Subah (lat. 15° N.), in 
which we recognise the Hebrew name. 
The worship of Ammon and Osiris 
was here celebrated in the most 
sumptuous manner. 810, Seba, was 
descended from Cush, Gen. x. 7. On 
its being conquered by Cambyses, he 
gave it the name of Meroé, after that 
of his sister. LXX. Σοήνη. See fur- 
ther on chap. xlv. 14. 

4, The compound 1x» is not to be 
understocd, in this place, in reference 
to time, but as assigning the reason 
why such a compensation was made 
for the deliverance of the Jews. Its 
repetition in °}38) is superseded by the 
continuative force of the Vau. In 
TAS), the Vau is simply inferential. 
This verse is epexegetical of the 
preceding. 

5—7. On the invasion of Judea by 
Nebuchadnezzar, many of the Jews 
fled into Egypt and other neighbour- 


CHAP. XLIII.] 


ISATAH. 


343 


I will bring thy seed from the east, 
And gather thee from the west. 

6 I will say to the north, Give up; 
And to the south, Keep not back ; 


Bring my sons from far, 


And my daughters from the ends of the earth ; 


“J 


Every one that is called by my name; 


Whom I have created for my glory ; 
Whom I have formed and made. 
8 Bring forth the blind people, that have eyes, 


And the deaf, that have ears. 


9 Let all the nations be assembled ; 
And let the people be collected. 
Who among them can declare this Ὁ 
Or shew us former predictions ? 
Let them produce their witnesses, that they may be justified ; 
That men may hear, and say, It is true. 


10 


Ye are my witnesses, saith Jehovah, 


And my Servant whom I have chosen ; 
That ye may know, and believe me, 
And understand, that I am ΠΕ. 

Before me no God was formed ; 

And after me there shall be none. 


11 1,1 am Jehovah ; 


ing countries, where they remained 
during the captivity. The conquests 
of Cyrus afforded them an opportunity 
of returning at the time of the resto- 
ration from Babylon. The verbs in 
ver. 6, are of the Fem. gender,—jy x 
being understood. 

8. By the blind and deaf are meant 
such Jews as had mixed themselves 
up with the heathen, learned their 
ways, and rejected the messages of 
Jehovah. They here form a subject 
of transition to the following challenge 
given to the idolatrous nations. Comp. 
chap. xlii. 18. 257 is the Imperative. 

10. Jehovah addresses the Jews 
who were to be restored to their own 
land, ver. 5—7, and shews that they 
were designed to bear testimony to 
the truth of his Divine existence and 
character, in opposition to the claims 


put forth by idolaters. This they 
specially did during the period which 
intervened between the restoration, 
and the advent of our Lord, the 729, 
Servant, (Targ. sw 12Y),) here speci- 
fically intended. Comp. chap. xhi. 1. 
By him, and by his apostles and 
succeeding ministers of the word, 
such testimony was to be borne, as 
should effect the complete overthrow 
of idol-worship. Comp. Mark xii. 29 ; 
John xvii. 3; Acts xiv. 15, xvii. 23— 
30; 1. Cor. viii. 6; 1 Thess. i. 9, 10. 
wir», was not formed, is not to be 
pressed, except as it sarcastically 
exposes the origin of idols: it is 
equivalent to was not. 

11. The repetition, 58 ‘8, is em- 
phatic. Comp. ver. 25, 11. 12. 28 28, 
xlviii. 15. 


344 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XLIII. 


And besides me there is no Saviour. 


12 


I have declared, and saved, and made it known, 


When there was no strange god among you: 
Ye also are my witnesses, saith Jehovah, 


That I am God. 
13 


From the time that day was, I am HE; 


And none can rescue from my hand ; 
I will execute my work ; and who shall hinder it ? 


14 Thus saith Jehovah, 


Your Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel: 
For your sakes I sent to Babylon ; 

And brake down all the barriers, 

And the Chaldeans in their joyous vessels. 


15 


I, Jehovah, am your Holy One, 


The Creator of Israel, your King. 


16 Thus saith Jehovah: 


He that made a way in the sea, 
And a path in the mighty waters ; 


17 
The army and the force :— 


That brought out the chariot and the horse, 


They lay down together; they rose no more ; 
They were quenched, they went out as a wick. 


18 


Remember not the former things ; 


Neither reflect on the things of old. 


12. At J, supply °x, as found in Ps. 
xliv. 21, lxxxi. 10. 

13. DIN, LXX. ἀπ᾽ ἀρχῆς ; from the 
first day of creation, Gen. i. 5. Not 
only did Jehovah exist as the _Immut- 
able, but also as the Omnipotent and 
Trresistible. 

14, ont’, the prophetic future, 
indicating the absolute certainty of 
the Medo-Persian invasion. 03, or, 
as Theod., Jerome, Abenezra, and 
Abarbanel, or), Jars, bolts; figura- 
tively, protectors, defenders, soldiers. 
This acceptation of the word is here 
preferable to that of fugitives, since it 
would seem to designate the land- 
troops, in contradistinction to the 
naval force of Babylon, mentioned 
immediately after. oOnm nvr, lit. the 
ships of their joy, i.e. the vessels 
manned by the Chaldeans, the crews 


of which cheered each other with a 
view to mutual excitement. That navi- 
gation in larger vessels obtained on 
the Euphrates in ancient times, is past 
dispute. See Herod. i. 184—186; 
Strabo, xvi. According to Huet, in 
his Hist. du Commer., Semiramis had 
a fleet of three thousand galleys. 
See Lowth’s Note. 

16—18. A forcible allusion to the 
destruction of the Egyptians in the 
Red Sea ; which, however, is declared, 
ver. 18, to be among those former in- 
terpositions of Divine Providence, 
that were to be eclipsed by the de- 
struction of the Babylonians, and the 
rescue of the captive Jews. These 
were to be so remarkable, that they 
should exclusively occupy the minds 
of the faithful. 


CHAP. XLIII.] 


19 


20 


. ISAIAH. 345 


Behold! I will effect a new thing ; 

Now it shall spring up; will ye not regard it? 
I will even make a way in the desert, 

And rivers in the wilderness, 

The beasts of the field shall honour me ; 

The wolves and the ostriches ; 

For I will put water in the desert, 

And rivers in the wilderness ; 


To furnish drink for my people, my chosen. 


21 


This people I have formed for myself; 


They shall celebrate my praise. 


22 


But thou hast not invoked me, O Jacob! 


Yea, thou hast been weary of me, O Israel! 


23 


Thou hast not brought me the lambs for thy burnt-offerings ; 


Neither hast thou honoured me with thy sacrifices ; 
I have not burdened thee with oblations, 


Nor wearied thee with incense. 
Thou hast not bought for me sweet cane with money ; 


24 


Neither hast thou satiated me with the fat of thy sacrifices ; 
But thou hast burdened me with thy sins; 


19—21. The circumstances con- 
nected with the return should be 
altogether novel in their character. 
To indicate that every provision for 
comfort and security would be made, 
the boldest poetical images are em- 
ployed. The whole should be cele- 
brated as exclusively the work of God, 
executed in behalf of his chosen 
people. 

22. Prone as the Jews ever were to 
imagine that they merited the Divine 
favour by their ceremonial obsery- 
ances, it was necessary, after the high 
terms in which they had been spoken 
of, and the enouncement of so remark- 
able a deliverance as that which was 
to be effected for them, to remind 
‘them of the facts, that, before the 
captivity, they had either neglected 
to present the prescribed offerings, 
or had done it in a mere formal 
manner; that while it lasted none 
had been imposed upon them ; and 
that, instead of serving their God, 
their conduct had been characterised 
by ingratitude and rebellion. As 


Lowth observes, the emphasis on 
which the sense depends, lies on the 
pronoun Ve. See his note, and comp. 
Amos v. 25. This verse contains a 
general proposition, which is explained 
in the particulars enumerated, vers. 
23, 94. 

24. πὴ, calamus aromaticus, the 
sweet cane, which is in high esti- 
mation in India, Western Asia, and 
Africa. Mr. Campbell relates, that 
the inhabitants of the two towns 
highest up in Africa, which he visited, 
presented him with pieces of sugar or 
sweet cane, about a foot in length, 
and in such quantities that the bottom 
of that part of the wagon where he 
sat was covered with it. It was an 
article of traffic, and often brought 
from a distance, Jer. vi. 20; and was 
used as a component ingredient in 
preparing the holy anointing oil, 
Exod. xxx. 23. In 72—m} is a paro- 
nomasia. The verbs ΤΩΣ and ὉΠ are 
repeated with great effect from the 
preceding verse; and, as here used, 
are strongly anthropopathical. The 


846 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XLII. 


Thou hast wearied me with thine iniquities. 


25 I, lam He, 


That blotteth out thy transgressions for my own sake, 
And will not remember thy sins. 


26 


Put me in remembrance ; let us plead together ; 


Record thou, that thou mayest be justified. 


27 


Thy chief father hath sinned, 


And thine interpreters have rebelled against me. 


28 


Therefore have I desecrated the rulers of the sanctuary, 


And given up Jacob to the curse, 


And Israel to reproaches. 


former, from 73¥, to serve, labour, means 
to impose labour upon one, to burden, or 
Jatigue with labour. 

25. For the repetition, see on ver. 
11: 
motives derived purely from my own 
nature ; uninfluenced by any cause in 

ou. 

26. The Jews are called upon to 
specify a single instance in which 
they had done any thing really meri- 
torious. Jehovah was willing, not 
only that the cause should be tried, 
but that they themselves should give 
the verdict. So evident was it that 
they had nothing to produce. 

27. WONT six, according to most 
commentators, means Adam, and even 
Gesenius thinks this interpretation is 
not altogether to be rejected. Hitzig 
and Scholz also adopt it. But that 
the reference is to some person or 
persons to whom the Jews in particular 
were related, the spirit of the passage 
requires. Yet Abraham, of whom 
others have thought, is likewise out 
of the question, on the ground that, 
though, like each of his posterity, he 
was chargeable with sin, yet he is 
elsewhere uniformly represented as a 
righteous or justified person, and not 
as one entailing punishment upon 
himself and others, The LXX. have 
taken the phrase to be a collective, ot 


2709, for my own sake; from’ 


πατέρες ὑμῶν πρῶτοι, your forefathers, | 
and this Gesenius prefers; but the | 
parallelism requires us to understand 
a person in office, and none is so 
likely to be intended as the High 
Priest. vox), first, is used not only of 
time, but also of dignity, as 1 Chron. 
xviii. 17; and Bx 373, the head or chief 
priest, and simply ‘x57, the chief, are 
employed to denote the Jewish pontiff. 
At the same time, there is no reason 
to conclude that only one High Priest 
is meant. By Ow are meant zz/er- 
preters of the Divine will, internuncii, 
religious teachers. Comp. Gen. xlii. 
23. The LXX. have ἄρχοντες ὑμῶν ; 
but Aq. and Symm. ἑρμηνεῖς σοῦ. 
Job xxxiil. 23. 

28. DIp WW, princes of the sanctuary, 
are the priests, 1 Chron. xxiv. 5. 308) 
wip τ, therefore have I desecrated, 
&c. affords an excellent sense, and 
is to be retained. The LXX., Syr., 
Houbigant, Lowth, and Boothroyd, 
unwarrantably substitute yw TM 
wm, Aud thy princes have profuned my 
sanctuary. The parallelism is decid- 
edly against such construction. The 
priests were profaned by being re- 
moved from the temple, and carried 
away promiscuously with the rest of 
the people into captivity. “Copula 
Ὑ hic pro illativa capitur.” Calvin. 


CHAP. XLIV.] 


ISATAH. 


347 


CHAPTER XLIV. 


Having promised complete forgiveness towards the close of the preceding 
chapter, the prophet now proceeds to predict the prosperous state of religion 
as the result of the effusion of the Holy Spirit, 1—5; again asserts the 
exclusive claims of Jehovah, 6—8 ; exposes with admirable effect, by the 
use of the keenest satire, the folly and absurdity of idolatry, 9—20 ; re- 
sumes the joyful subject of emancipation, 21—23 ; and then re-asserts the 
Divine supremacy as evinced in the frustration of the heathen oracles, and 
the fulfilment of the predictions respecting the expedition of Cyrus, whom 


he expressly names, 24—28, 


1 YeET now, hear, O Jacob! my servant, 
And Israel! whom I have chosen ; 

2 Thus saith Jehovah, thy Maker, 
He that formed thee, and helped thee from the womb: 
Fear not, O my servant Jacob! 
O Jeshurun! whom I have chosen. 

3 For I will pour water upon the thirsty soil, 
And streams upon the dry ground ; 
I will pour my Spirit upon thy seed, 
And my blessing upon thine offspring : 

4 So that they shall grow up as among the grass; 
As willows by the watercourses. 

5 One shall say, I am Jehovah’s; 


2. The womb in which the Israelites 
had been was Egypt: their birth, the 
exodus. pt, a poetical diminutive of 
affection; hence the LXX. ἠγαπημένος. 
The root is W= Wry, fo be straight, 
right, upright, righteous. οἱ Nour. εὐθὺς. 
Jehovah recognises the Jews in this 
character in consideration of their 
entire abandonment of idolatry, and 
return to his service. It is in this 
sense that their ancient kings are often 
said to have done wn, that which was 
right in the eyes of the Lord. Comp. 
Deut. xxxii. 15, xxxiii. 5, 26. 

4. The conjunction Ὁ in 37x) is to 
be taken ἐκβατικῶς, so that; in conse- 


quence of the effusion, &c. Instead 
of 723, five MSS., five more originally, 
now one, twelve printed editions, and 
the LXX., read p23, which may have 
been the primitive lection. Forty- 
five MSS., originally ten more, now 
two, and seven editions, read 123 ; and 
a few }22; according to which the 
meaning would be iz a grassy place. 
The images here employed denote 
luxuriance and abundance. 

5. Not only should true religion 
flourish among the natural posterity 
of Jacob ; numerous proselytes would 
joyfully participate in their privileges, 
Comp. Zech, viii. 23. πὶ repeated de- 


348 ι 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XLIV. 


Another shall distinctly avow the name of Jacob ; 
And another shall inscribe on his hand: JEHOVAH’S; 
And shall speak honourably of the name of Israel. 
6 Thus saith Jehovah, the king of Israel, 
And his Redeemer, Jehovah of Hosts : 
I am the First, I also am the Last; 
And besides me there is no God. 
7 For who like me hath announced ? 
Let him even declare it, and arrange it for me, 


notes number and diversity. See Ps. 
Ixxxvul. 4,6. Their profession of the 
true religion should be open and 
visible. ‘Ow 8p cannot here signify 
to call upon, so that prayers should be 
addressed to the patriarch Jacob, or 
to the people collectively, but ἕο pro- 
claim, enounce the name of any one, 
Ps. xlix. 12; Isa. xii. 4.” Hitzig. This 
is so far good ; but there seems to be 
further included in the phrase, as here 
used, the idea of so employing the 
name as to indicate that those to whom 
it belongs are alone to be regarded as 
worshippers of the true God. The 
use of 723 as a synonymous verb in 
the corresponding member of the 
parallelism confirms this interpre- 
tation. This verb in Chaldee signifies 


to address a person by his title ; es 


in Arab. significavit aliquid nomine 
improprio, cognominavit, blanditus est cir- 
cumlocutione ; and in Hebrew the ac- 
ceptation is obviously that of speaking 
of any one in a flattering or honourable 
manner. See Job xxxu. 21, 22; Isa. 
xlv. 4. Symm. renders 87’, passively, 
κληθήσεται. The LXX. have βοήσεται 
for both verbs. The words 1? 17» may 
either be rendered, he shall write with 
his hand, i. e. subscribe, as one does 
a document or declaration ; or, he shall 
inscribe on his hand the word, 7. 
The former mode of construction 
Déderlein, Dathe, Rosenmiiller, in his 
Schol. V. T. in Compend. redact, Ge- 
senius, and Jenour, prefer; but the 
latter, first adopted by the LXX., 
ἕτερος ἐπιγράψει χειρὶ αὐτοῦ τοῦ Θεοῦ 
εἰμὶ, is that approved by Michaelis, 
Lowth, Tingstad., v.d. Palm, Booth- 
royd, Hitzig,and Scholz. The Hebrew 
is simply, he shall write his hand, ‘Vis 


the Accusative of object, governed by 
any. The language is figurative, and 
is borrowed from the ancient custom 
of burning marks into the hand, or 
some other part of the body, for the 
purpose of expressing the name of the 
person to whom one belonged. Thus 
the slave had the name of his master ; 
the soldier of his commander; and 
the idolater of his god. See Spencer 
de Leg. Hebreor. lib. 11. cap. xx. 
Comp. Ezek. ix. 4; Rev. xiii. 16. For 
the force of 7, comp. 7? Ὁ, Exod. 
Xxxii. 26; and for the accomplishment 
of the prophecy in the times between 
the return of the Jews from Babylon, 
and the advent of Christ, see the note 
on chap. xix. 23. 

6. TSW) ΟΝ Ὅν, 7 am the First, 
and I am the Last,—a sublime character 
of the Deity, by which he vindicates 
to himself absolute eternity and su- 
premacy. He is the infinitely perfect 
Being—the First Cause and Last End 
of all things. Comp. chap. xli. 4, 
xlviii. 12. In Rev. 1. 17, ii. 8, and 
xxii. 13, our Saviour appropriates the 
attributes to himself, without re- 
striction or reservation. Compare 
the language of Orpheus, Zed, ἀρχὴ 
πάντων, πάντων τε τελετὴ, Hym. xiv. 7: 
and Ζεὺς πρῶτος ἐγένετο---Ζεὺς ὕστατος. 
Dr. Bloomfield on Rev. i. 11. 

7. By Dv Dy, the ancient people, some 
understand the Hebrews ; but it is 
preferable to interpret the phrase, as 
Ezek. xxvi. 20, of the oldest inha- 
bitants of the globe ; so that the 
meaning will be, from the most ancient 
times. Though the Jews were the 
depositaries of the ancient prophecies, 
and most of them were delivered by 
persons belonging to that nation, yet 
others were announced long before 


CHAP. XLIV. | 


ISAIAH. 


349 


From the time that I settled the ancient people ; 
Or, let them declare to them future things, things that shall 


happen. 
8 Fear not, neither be terrified ; 


Have I not of old published it to thee, and declared it ? 


Ye therefore are my witnesses. 
Is there a God besides me ? 


There is, indeed, no Rock ; I know of none. 

9 All that form a graven image are vanity ; 
And their objects of delight profit not :— 
Yea, they are themselves witnesses ; 


They neither see nor know ; 
That they may be ashamed. 


10 Who hath formed a god, 


And cast an image, that profiteth nothing ? 


1 


Behold! all his associates shall be ashamed : 


For the workmen themselves are of men: 
Let them all assemble; let them stand up ; 
They shall be afraid and ashamed together. 


12 


The smith prepareth an axe, and worketh in the coals ; 


He fashioneth it also with hammers, and worketh it with his 


powerful arm ; 


they had a national existence. Be- 
tween nvoR and 781m there is no 
essential difference of meaning ; they 
are merely synonymes, employed to de- 
note the certainty of the future events. 
Twelve MSS., originally another, and 
one by correction, read Wx, without 
1; as does also the Syriac. 102 172, 
let them—the fictitious gods—declare 
to them, i.e. their worshippers : or, the 
Dative may be the dativus commodi: 
let the idolaters declare, in vindication 
of the claims of their deities. 

8, 3n, in two MSS., 371A, is a ἅπαξ 


Aey., but cognate with the Arab. δ)»; 


pre metu attonitus fuit. The root AY is 
related to the verb ἣν ; Theod. μὴ θαμ- 
βεῖσθε. 

9. The exposure of idolatry in this 
and the following verses is inimitably 
forcible and beautiful. With the most 
exact disposition of the parts, are 
combined an exactness and vividness 
of delineation, a pointedness of sar- 


casm, a force of argument, and a con- 
cinnity and elegance of expression, 
which entitle the passage to the 
highest place among the compositions 
of our seer. OF TOT mean the objects 
of their idolatrous attachment, their 
idols, which they procured at much 
trouble and expense. The four extra- 
ordinary points over 727 were designed 
by the punctuators to fix the attention 
of the reader on the dumb idols being 
constituted witnesses against the stu- 
pidity of their worshippers. 

10. What is here put as a question 
is the real fact of the case. The 
question is strongly ironical. 

11. yun, all who assist the idol- 
maker. "If they are themselves of 
human origin, what absurdity for them 
to pretend to impart divinity ? Comp. 
Acts xvii. 29. 

12. “13 OW, the fabricator of iron, 15 
the smith ; ; just as oxy om, the fabri- 
cator of wood, ver. 13, is the car penter. 
Before ὙΠῸ supply 21 or 8. The 


xX X 


250 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XLIY. 


He becometh hungry, and hath no strength ; 
He drinketh no water, and is faint. 


13 


The carpenter stretcheth out the line ; 


He sketcheth its figure with a sharp tool ; 


He worketh it with chisels ; 


He marketh it off with a compass ; 
He maketh it into human shape, 


After the beauty of a man ; 
To dwell in a house. 
14 


He heweth down cedars for himself ; 


He taketh also the ilex and the oak ; , 
And what he deemeth firm among the trees of the forest ; 
He planteth the pine, and the rain nourisheth it. 


substantive, 575, properly signifies 
what is black; charcoal, coal: Arab. 


» multum niger fuit : and = carbo. 


The point of the argument in this verse 
consists in a human being putting 
forth all his might in merely forming 
an instrument to be afterwards em- 
ployed in making a god, while he is 
reminded by the cravings of nature 
that he is himself a weak and de- 
pendent creature. 

13. The axe having been prepared 
for the use of the carpenter, his share 
in the business of god-making is next 
graphically described. He first of all 
measures off the piece of wood which 
is to form the idol ; then cuts it into 
a rude shape; after which he takes 
the exact dimensions of the several 
parts, and brings out a due proportion; 
and finishes by subjecting it to those 
nicer operations by which it assumes 
the graceful appearance of the human 


form. WY, Arab. οἵ μον, acus sutorum, 


subula, stylus, Aq. mapaypadis, a sharp 
instrument, graver, &c. Comp. the 
Talmudic 01, DoW, to draw lines by 
cutting them into the wood or stone. 
This signification is better supported 
than that of @ coloured line or cord, 
such as carpenters alsouse. Whether 
m2 15 to be understood of an ordinary 
house, or of a temple, which it also signi- 
fies, is doubtful. Idols were set up 
in both, 


14. The absurdity of idolatry is 
next exposed by shewing that there 
was nothing supernatural about the 
materials of which the gods were 
made. The wood was either such as 
grew spontaneously, or such as the 
carpenter had planted for a supply. 
ΤῊΣ is the Infin. absolute, used for 
the finite verb. m7, most probably, 
as the Vulg. renders, ¢he tlex, a species 
of oak, so called from its peculiar 
hardness and strength. Comp. the 


Arab. ip , durus, validus, rigidus fuit. 


Celsius, Hierobotan. tom. ii. p. 269. 
Its occurrence in connexion with 7x 
is in favour of this meaning. ix, 
LXX. πίτυς ; Vulg. pinus. This, which 
is the most ancient, is most probably 
the true interpretation of the word. 
Others take it to mean ornus, the 


ash; and others, the Arab. ΠΝ a 


thorny tree, which grows in Arabia 
Petraea. 19 yas) most moderns render, 
and chooseth for himself; but no such 
signification can fairly be brought out 
of the verb. It has merely been 
adopted from a supposed exigency of 
the place. Lowth, /ayeth in good store ; 
others otherwise. I do not see why 
we may not here apply the well- 
known principle, that verbs in Piel 
frequently express, not the reality or 
intensity of what is signified by the 
primitive form, but what is ¢hougit or 
conceived of in reference to it. The 


CHAP. XLIV.] 


ISATAH. 


351 


15 They serve a man even for fuel ; 
For he taketh of them, and warmeth himself ; 
He also kindleth a fire, and baketh bread ; 
He even maketh a god, and bendeth down to it; 
He maketh a graven image, and worshippeth it. 


16 
On part of it he eateth flesh ; 


Part of it he burneth in the fire ; 


He roasteth a roast, and eateth his full; 
He also warmeth himself, and saith, 
Ah! I am warm, I see the fire. 


17 


But the remainder of it he maketh a god, his graven image ; 


He falleth down to it, and worshippeth it ; 
He also prayeth to it, and saith, 
Deliver me, for thou art my God. 


18 


They know not, neither do they understand ; 


For their eyes are plastered over, so that they cannot see ; 
Their hearts, that they cannot perceive. 


19 


say : 


Yea, none reflecteth in his mind: 
He hath neither the knowledge, nor the intelligence 


Part οἵ τὸ I have burned in the fire ; 

I have also baked bread over the coals thereof ; 

I have roasted flesh, and eaten it. 

Shall I then make the remainder of it an abomination ? 
Shall I bow down to a clump of wood ? 


words are thus a periphrase, denoting 
whatever other trees the carpenter 
might find suitable to his purpose. 

15. A similar exposure of the ab- 
surdity of idol-worship is given by 
Horace : 


“Olim truncus eram ficulnus, inutile 
lignum, ; 

Cum faber incertus, scamnum facer- 
etne Priapum, 

Maluit esse Deum.”—~Sq/é. i. 8. 1. 


Comp. also Wisdom xiii. 11—13, which 
is manifestly an imitation of this pas- 
sage in Isaiah. 

16. V3 >Y, on a part of it, i.e. the 
wood, by which is meant the plate or 
dish on which the meat was served. 
m1, ¢o see, the Hebrews employ to 
describe perception by any of the 


to 
senses, as well as by the eyes. Pis- 
cator, “Sensi calorem ignis.” It is 


a natural way of expressing the cause 
of the heat derived from fire. 

18. 7, from m7, or, if pointed 
mm, from 7, fo plaster, close up: Syr. 
‘Sa. Comp. chap. vi. 10. For the 


negative force of Ὁ in Mixy and 72079, 
see chap. xvil. 1. 

19. The slightest degree of con- 
sideration must convince the idolater 
of the absurdity of his conduct. 
mavin, an object of abhorrence, is not 
the term which the speaker can be 
supposed to have selected ; but it is 
employed by Isaiah to express the 
detestation in which the Jews were 
taught to hold every object of heathen 
worship, 


352 


20 He feedeth upon ashes ; 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XLIV. 


A deluded heart hath turned him aside ; 
So that he cannot extricate himself, nor say, 
[5 there not a lie in my right hand ? 


21 


Remember these things, O Jacob ! 


O Israel! for thou art my servant : 
I have formed thee ; thou art my servant: 
O Israel! thou shalt not forget me. 


22 


[ have blotted out as a cloud thy transgressions, 
And as a thick cloud thy sins : 


Return to me, for I have redeemed thee. 


23 


Sing, O ye heavens! for Jehovah hath done it ; 


Shout, ye lower parts of the earth! 
Burst into song, O ye mountains! 
Thou forest, and every tree therein ! 
For Jehovah hath redeemed Jacob, 
And glorified himself in Israel. 


24 


Thus saith Jehovah, thy Redeemer, 


Kiven He that formed thee from the womb: 
1 am Jehovah, the Maker of all; 


20. For the phrase ἜΝ 7Y4, comp. 
mi ivy, Hos. xii. 2. Both indicate 
the pursuit of what can yield no 
substantial good. For the rest of the 
verse, Comp. πλανῶντες kal πλανώμενοι, 
2 Tim. iii. 13. 

21. Jehovah now directly addresses 
the Jews in Babylon, and calls upon 
them, while they looked around and 
witnessed innumerable instances of 
the stupidity and absurdity which 
had just been described, to contrast 
with the condition of such degraded 
Adolaters the relation in which, as his 
people, they stood to him, and the 
benefits which he had conferred, and 
would still confer upon them. 22, 
the LXX., Syr., Vulg., Chald., Jarchi, 
Musculus, Michaelis, Dathe, Déder- 
lein, Tingstadius, Hensler, Méller, 
Hitzig, and Scholz, render, forget me 
not, ΟΥ̓, thou shalt not forget me, which 
better suits the connexion than the 
rendering of the Com. Ver., Lowth, 
Boothroyd, Jenour, Gesen., &c. 

22, 23. An announcement of the 
complete pardon of the sins for which 
the Jews had been carried captive to 


Babylon; their repentance and deli- 
verance ; and a powerful apostrophe, 
by which the whole of nature is 
summoned to celebrate the event. 
Nothing can exceed the sublimity 
and beauty of the latter verse. 

24, The Ὁ in 83, “ from the womb,” 
is not to be pressed, so as to exclude 
their formation iz it. The phrase 
means, from the earliest period of 
existence. Instead of the Chethib, 
ὮΝ, thirty-one MSS., seventeen edi- 
tions, the LXX., and Vulg., read Ὁ 
‘nx, who was with me? but this divi- 
sion quite breaks in upon the sym- 
metry of the passage. The Keri, 
‘pyn, from, or by myself, is therefore to 
be adopted: it is exhibited in the 
text of fifteen MSS.; four editions, 
among which the Soncin., Rabboth, 
and the Syr. Gesenius aptly com- 


pares comic we? in the Arab. ver- 


sion of John viii. 28. In this and 
the following verses, Jehovah asserts 
the exclusiveness of his creative and 
providential power. He alone is God: 
besides him there is none. else. 


CHAP. XLIV.]| 


ISAIAH. 


That stretched forth the heavens alone ; 
That spread out the earth by myself ; 


25 That frustrateth the signs of the impostors ; 


And sheweth the diviners to be fools : 
That refuteth the sages, 
And proveth their knowledge to be folly : 


26 That establisheth the word of his servant, 


And accomplisheth the counsel of his messengers : 


That saith of Jerusalem, She shall be inhabited ; 
And of the cities of Judah, They shall be built ; 


353 


- And, I will restore her desolate places : 
27 He that saith to the deep, Be dry ; 


And, I will dry up thy rivers: 


28 He that saith of Cyrus, My Shepherd ; 


25. By nin are meant the portenta, 
prodigia, or omens from which the 
augurs of the ancient pagans pre- 
tended to foretel lucky or unlucky 
events, such as the flight, chattering 
and singing of birds, appearances in 
the heavens, &c. o72 Michaelis ren- 
ders die Hinsiedler, i.e. “hermits,” and 
remarks that, in the East, such per- 
sons are addicted to soothsaying. It 
rather signifies dies, from 113, to be 
singular ; things which exceed belief ; 
and hence, by an easy transition, fa/se- 


hoods. Comp. the Syr, |,=, commen- 


tus est. The abstract is here put for 
Dy ΣΝ, authors of falsehoods, i.e. im- 
postors. 

26. A distinct recognition of the 
predictions uttered by Isaiah and 
other prophets respecting the restora- 
tion from Babylon. The 7zy of the 
Divine messengers does not mean 
any counsel or advice of their own, 
tendered to the Jews, but the purpose 
of Jehovah which they were com- 
missioned toannounce. It is parallel 
with 721, which means the revealed 
word of God. Dw being a femin. 
when the city is meant, 2417 must be 
the third person sing. fem.; to agree 
with which, ? is to be rendered of, 
respecting, aS not unfreq. after verbs 
of speaking. Thus also the following, 
ΤΟΙ ; and 723, ver. 28, 


27. The commentators are generally 
agreed that this verse contains a pre- 
diction of the stratagem adopted by 
Cyrus, by which he easily effected 
the capture of Babylon. By making 
a trench from the Euphrates to the 
empty marsh, which anciently formed 
the artificial lake Nitocris, he diverted 
the water from its usual channel, so 
as to leave the river fordable by his 
infantry, who marched straight up 
its bed into the city. Herodot. 1. 
185, 190; Xenoph. Cyroped. vii. 
Perhaps there is likewise a reference 
to his diverting the waters of the 
Gyndes into a hundred and sixty 
trenches. That the words of the 
prophet are to be taken in a literal 
sense, appears on comparing them 
with Jer. 1. 38, which contains a 
similar prediction. 

28. Cyrus, the Persian monarch, by 
whom Babylon was to be taken, and 
the Jews restored to their own land, 
is now introduced by name: wy, 


Pers. ype oF Dy MU yg; Hur, 
Khur, Khurshid, which signifies the 
Sun. Thus, in the book entitled Sad- 


der, ye 2. Xe, the Moon and the Sun ; 


ane eee 
heart was brighter than the light of the 


854 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XLV. 


And, He shall perform all my pleasure : 
That saith of Jerusalem, She shall be built ; 
And of the temple, It shall be founded. 


Swit. CO 9 5- Abulfeda explains by 
meisll gins, the splendour of the Sun. 


The word frequently occurs in the poet 
Ferdusi, who also uses Luss > 


of a priest of the Sun. Ctesias and 
Plutarch derive the name from the 
same source: Κύρος---ἀπὸ τοῦ ἡλίου. 
Thus the Etymolog. Mag.: Κόρος ὁ 


βασιλεὺς τῶν Περσῶν ὁ παλαιός. Ἡλίου 


γὰρ ἔχει τὸ ὄνομα. Κοῦρον γὰρ καλεῖν 
Sez) ς la \ ω 
εἰώθασιν of Πέρσαι τὸν Ἥλιον. If we 


reject the ὦ in wy3, as merely a ter- 
mination, expressing the , « of the 


ei 
Persic Διὸ 25 we have in the He- 


brew the exact form of this ancient 
name ; only pointing it with Shurec, 
instead of Holem. Infidel critics 
stumble at this express mention of 
the name of Cyrus by Isaiah, who 
flourished so long before his appear- 
ance ; but king Josiah was likewise 
predicted by name, upwards of three 
centuries before his birth, 1 Kings 
xii. 2. Cyrus was the son of Cam- 
byses king of Persia, by Mandane, 
a daughter of Astyages, king of the 
Medes. When only sixteen years of 
age, he commanded an army against 
the Assyrians ; he afterwards assisted 
his uncle Cyaxares IT. in an expedition 
against the Babylonians, on which 


occasion he obtained the command 
of all the Median troops; defeated 
Creesus, king of Lydia ; and soon after 
put an end to the Chaldzan monarchy, 
by the conquest of Babylon, in the 
year B.c. 5388 or 539. On his return 
to Persia he married his cousin, and 
obtained with her the right of succes- 
sion to the crown of Media, which he 
united in his own person with that of 
Persia on the death of Cyaxares, in 
536 or 535. Scarcely had he ascended 
the throne of the Medo-Persian em- 
pire, than he issued his celebrated 
edict, granting permission to the Jews 
to return to their own country, and 
ordering them to be furnished with 
what was requisite for rebuilding the 
temple, 2 Chron. xxxvi. 22, 23; Ezra i. 
He died at the age of seventy, after a 
reign of thirty years. For his cha- 
racter, see on chap. xli. 2. According 
to Josephus, Antiq. lib. XI. 1. 2, the 
Jews in Babylon shewed this text to 
Cyrus, which he acknowledged in his 
edict, and ascribed his possession of 
universal empire to the God of Israel. 
After ‘YS supply 7. Kings and princes 
are called shepherds in Scripture, as 
they are in the ancient classics. It 
was a title to which Cyrus was par- 
tial: it being a proverbial saying with 
him, “ A good prince‘and a good shep- 
herd have the same duties,” Cyropzed. 
Vili. 


CHAPTER XLV. 


A continuation of the subject more prominently introduced at the end of the 
preceding chapter—the commission of Cyrus. That monarch is now 
directly addressed, and receives gracious.promises of Divine direction, sup- 


port, and success, 1—5. 


The prophet then specifies one of the grand 


CHAP. XLV.] ISAIAH. 


355 
designs to be effected by the Persian conquests, 6, 7 ; predicts, in the form 
of hortatory address, the joyful arrival of the deliverance from Babylon, 8 ; 
denounces judgment upon the unbelieving and captious Jews of the capti- 
vity, 9, 10 ; expostulates with them on their presumption in arraigning the 
Divine conduct, 11; asserts the sovereignty of Jehovah, and his determina- 
tion to employ Cyrus as his instrument, 12, 13; foretels the great accession 
of proselytes which should succeed the captivity, 14 ; expresses the confi- 
dence exercised by the pious in God, notwithstanding the darkness of his 
dispensations, that deliverance should arrive, the Divine predictions be ful- 
filled, and idolaters confounded, 15—19; calls upon all to forsake their 
idolatry, and return to the service of the true God, 20—22 ; and concludes 
by announcing the superior blessings to be enjoyed under the reign of Mes- 


siah, 23—25. 


1 Tuus saith Jehovah to his Anointed, to Cyrus, 
Whom 1 hold by the right hand ; 


To subdue nations before him, 
And ungird the loins of kings 


. 
7 


To open before him the folding doors, 
And the gates shall not be shut. 


I will go before thee, 


And will make the rough places plain ; 


The folding doors of brass I will break in pieces ; 


And cut in sunder the bars of 


1. Cyrus is called the “ Anointed” 
of the Lord, because he had, in his 
providence, appointed him to the rule 
under which the Jews were to be 
restored. The allusion is to the 
ancient rite of anointing with oil 
those who were invested with royal 
dignity. Judges ix. 8; 1 Sam. ix. 16, 
xv. 1; 1 Kings i. 34. OH», fo wubind, 
ungird, 18 opposed to x, which sig- 
nifies 20 bind up, gird, &c., and here 
means to deprive of power and dig- 
nity : Oriental monarchs being accus- 
tomed to wear richly decorated girdles, 
which at once gave strength to their 
bodies, and added to the splendour of 
their state. For the nations subdued 
by Cyrus, see on chap. xli. 2, and Xe- 
nophon as there quoted. on and 
oy are synonymes; only the for- 
mer refers to the two divisions, or 
folding-doors by which the gates were 
secured. The gates here spoken of 


i 


iron. 


are those of Babylon, of which there 
were an hundred, all of brass. TvAae 
δὲ ἐνεστᾶσι πέριξ τοῦ τείχεος ἑκατὸν 
XAAKEAI ΠΑ͂ΣΑΙ. Herodot. i. 179. 
See also Euseb. Preeparat. Evangel. 1. 
ix.c.41. By a remarkable providence, 
and contrary to what might have been 
expected on the part of the besieged, 
the gates leading to the river had been 
left open on the night of the attack by 
Cyrus, in consequence of which his 
troops found no difficulty in entering 
the city. Even the gates of the palace 
were incautiously opened during the 
tumult occasioned by the invasion. 
So minutely was this prediction ful- 
filled. 

2. God promises to remove every 
impediment out of the way of Cyrus. 
opm, LXX. ὄρη, heights, raised, or 


rough places; Arab. yom intumutt, 
.,,Δ5. locus declivis, quo quis delabitur. 


956 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XLY. 


3 I will also give thee the treasures that are in darkness, 
And the stores that are in hidden places ; 
That thou mayest know, that I am Jehovah ; 
The God of Israel, that hath announced thy name. 

4 For the sake of Jacob my servant, 


And Israel my chosen, 


I called thee distinctly by thy name; 
I made honourable mention of thee, though thou knewest me 


not. 


5 Iam Jehovah, and there is none else; 


Besides me there is no God: 


I have girded thee, though thou knewest me not ; 
6 That men may know at the rising of the sun, 

And at his setting, that there is none beside me: 

I am Jehovah, and there is none else: 
7 The Former of light, and the Creator of darkness ; 


3. Not only did Cyrus seize upon 
the immense riches of Babylon, Jer. 
1. 37; but, on subduing Creesus, king 
of Lydia, that monarch delivered up 
to him his treasures, amounting in 
value to 126,224,000/. sterling. See 
Cyropeed. vil.; Plin, Hist. Nat. xxxiii. 
2.15. Brerewood de Ponderibus, cap. 
x. Costly stores are generally de- 
posited in places remote from the 
public gaze; and, especially in the 
East, under ground, that they may be 
safe from plunderers. 

4, 7228, [ have made honourable men- 
tion of thee. See on chap. xliv. 5. It 
was no surname, but his own proper 
name that Jehovah gave to Cyrus. 
The meaning is, that he had spoken 
of him by the prophet, in terms such 
as had never been employed in refer- 
ence to any other heathen prince,— 
giving him the character of righteous, 
declaring that he loved him, and that 
he would protect and prosper him. 
Chap. xli. 2, xliv. 28, xlv. 2, 3, 13, 
xlviii. 14. 

5,6. Though the Persians, among 
whom Cyrus had received his educa- 
tion, held the worshippers of idols in 
abhorrence, they had no proper idea 
of the only living and true God. Je- 
hovah repeatedly asserts this fact, and 
vindicates to himself the claims of 


exclusive divinity. The conquests of 
Cyrus prepared the way for a new 
state of things, both in the East and 
the West: vast political changes en- 
sued, which eventually resulted in 
the diffusion of revealed truth through- 
out the world; not to mention the 
striking effect which the recognition 
of Jehovah in the royal edict must 
have produced, especially in all the 
countries in which the Jews were 
scattered. The πίη 72 is doubtless 
the pronominal suffix, without Mappic. 
Comp. chap. xxiii. 17,18. The form 
of the noun, in every other instance, 
is 12. The two most distant geo- 
graphical points known to the ancients 
are fixed on, including all the regions 
between. 

7. This verse asserts the superiority 
of Jehovah to the dualistic powers of 
Parsism. The Magi taught, that there 
are two co-eternal supramundane 
beings: Ormuzd, the pure and eternal 
principle of light, the source of all 
that is good; and Ahriman, the source 
of darkness, and fountain of all evil, 
both physical and moral. These two 
divide the empire of the world, and 
are in perpetual conflict with each 
other. The system in which the doc- 
trine of these antagonistic principles is 
taught is contained in the Zend-Avesta, 


CHAP. XLY.| 


_ISATAH. 


o07 


The Maker of peace, and the Creator of evil: 
I am Jehovah, the Maker of all these. 


8 Drop, ye heavens, from above ; 


Yea, let the clouds shower down righteousness ; 
Let the earth open, that Salgado and righteousness may be 


produced ; 


Let her bring them forth at once : 


I, Jehovah, create it. 


9 Wo to him that contendeth with Him that formed him !— 


A potsherd of the potsherds of 


the earth ! 


Shall the clay say to its potter, What makest thou? 
Or thy work, He hath no hands ? 


10 


Wo to him that saith to his father, What begettest thou ? 


Or to the woman, With what art thou in pain ? 

11 Thus saith Jehovah, the Holy One of Israel, and his Maker: 
As for things to come, will ye question me concerning my children? 
Or will ye give me a charge ae the work of my hands ? 


I made the earth, 
And created man upon it ; 


12 


or Living Word, commonly ascribed 
~to Zoroaster, the great reformer of 
the Parsees. In opposition to all such 
ideas, God claims an eternal indepen- 
dence and sovereignty. Both good 
and evil are under his absolute direc- 
tion and control. δ being here op- 
posed to . Οὐ, peace, or prosperity, 
must mean affliction, adversity, το. 
Comp. Amos 1. 6. ° 
_ 8. I consider mp1 xx to be the 
nominatives to the "plural m1; and 
yw that to moxn, which makes all 
plain. The Tae, Syr., and Vulg., 
read the verb in the singular. , 
9—12. That the infidel and discon- 
tented portion of the Jewish people 
is here intended, seems beyond dis- 
pute. No arguments could more forci- 
bly evince the extreme arrogance and 
folly of creatures pretending to scan 
and carp at the plans of Divine Pro- 
vidence. They are directly ad homi- 
nem. Comp. Rom. ix. 20, &., where 
the Apostle is asserting the sovereign 
right which God has to dispose of all 
creatures, according to his holy and 
righteous pleasure. The m8 in wy 
MOIR Wn creates some difficulty. 


It seems to be used in the sense of 
closeness, union, society, identity of rela- 
tionship, &c. Comp. Gen. v. 24, vi. 18. 
It is thus equivalent to one of, on a par 
with, of, a8 toa common nature. Thus 
Oo νὰ ὡ - Qo 
the Syr. {S3}> aD eae «Ὁ [Dyae, 
a, potsherd of the potsherds of the 
earth.” The language is that of con- 
tempt, being expressive of the mean 
and worthless character of the subject 
spoken of. The LXX. and Theod. 
have read ww instead of win. The 
close connexion of the word with 13%, 
the potter, shews that the Masoretic 
pronunciation of it is correct. ND 
is subordinated to ‘27 in the Future, 
and both are to be rendered interro- 
gatively. The indicative form, “ask 
ye me,” &c., is unsuitable to the con- 
nexion. The expostulation concludes 
with an unanswerable argument for 
acquiescence in the special arrange- 
ments of providence, drawn from the 
creation and government of the Uni- 
verse. The use of 8 before '? is 
emphatic. 


358 


13 


14 


ISATAH. 


It was my hands that spread out the heavens ; 

I also gave charge to all their host. 

I have raised him up for righteousness, 

And will direct all his ways ; 

He shall build my city, and release my captives ; 
But not for hire, nor for reward, 

Saith Jehovah of Hosts. 

Thus saith Jehovah : 

The wealth of Egypt; and the gains of Cush, 
And the Sabeeans, men of stature, 

Shall pass over to thee, and be thine ; 

They shall follow thee ; 

They shall pass over in chains ; 

They shall even prostrate themselves to thee ; 
They shall pray toward thee : 
Only in thee [shall they say] 


(CHAP. XLV. 


is God, and there is none else; 


13. Cyrus is again pointedly referred 
to, as the instrument of restoring the 
Jewish polity. In accomplishing this 
object, he was not impelled by any 
prospect of remuneration, but by a 
sense of justice, and a regard to the 
command of God. Comp. lii. 3. 

14, From the similarity of this verse 
with chap. xlii. 3, Munster, Musculus, 
Tirinus, Grotius, and v.d. Palm, have 
been induced to apply it to Cyrus, but 
the words, > 3 9x, oxly in thee is God, 
render it impossible consistently to 
adopt such an interpretation. The 
punctators, who are followed, among 
the moderns, by Michaelis, Déderlein, 
Dathe, Gesenius, Hitzig, and Scholz, 
apply it to Jerusalem, and rightly. 
The prophecy refers to the result of 
the Persian conquests in Egypt, &c., 
as regards the Jews and their religion. 
Favoured as the people of God were 
by the victors, the inhabitants of these 
countries would be led to respect 
them, inquire into their peculiar polity, 
send them munificent presents, and, 
in great numbers, become proselytes 
to their religion. Comp. chap. xviii. 
7, xix. 18—25; Zeph. iii. 10; Ps. 
Ixviili. 29—31; Zech. viii. 20—23 ; 
Acts viii. 27. The countries here 
mentioned were celebrated in ancient 
times for their immense trade, com- 
merce, and opulence. They are those 


specified chap. xliii. 3. Of the ox320, 
inhabitants of Meroé, it is added, that 
they were ΠῚ "22x, men of extension, or 
length; i.e. tall of stature. LXX. 
ἄνδρες ὑψηλοὶ. Comp. 1 Chron. xi. 
23. ‘The Ethiopians are described by 
Herodotus, Ὁ. ii. 114, as ἄνδρας peyi- 
στους καὶ καλλίστους καὶ μακροβιωτά- 
τους, “of the highest stature, the most 
beautiful and longlived of men.” See 
also the same book, 20: λέγονται εἶναι 
μέγιστοι ἀνθρώπων ; and Solin. cap. 30, 
Aithiopes duodecim pedes longi. Aga- 
tharchides also, speaking of the Sa- 
beans, sayS: Td σώματα ἔστι τῶν κατοι- 
κούντων ἀξιολογώτερα. ‘The coming 
of these people zz chains is a figurative 
mode of expression, denoting the sub- 
missiveness with which they should 
present themselves as worshippers of 
Jehovah. 2m 728 does not mean 
that they were to worship or make 
supplication to the Jews, but that 
such of them as could not personally 
come to Jerusalem would direct their 
worship towards the temple in that 
city, as the place of Jehovah’s earthly 
residence. Comp. 1 Kings viii. 35, 
where the phrase 137 Di97 Ox n7, to 
pray towards this place, occurs, as does 
mIn 37 oN, toward this house, 42; and 
VT TT TD Ox, to Jehovah, in the direc- 
tion of the city,44; ἕο. Comp. also 
Dan. vi. 10, 11. 


CHAP. XLY.] 


There is no God. 


ISAIAH. 


309 


Surely, thou art a God that hidest thyself, 
O God of Israel, the Saviour ! 
They shall be ashamed ; and shall all of them be confounded ; 


They shall go into confusion together that fabricate images. 


But Israel shall be saved through Jehovah, 
With an everlasting salvation ; 


Ye shall not be ashamed, nor confounded, 


To eternal ages. 
18 
He is God; 


For thus saith Jehovah, the Creator of the heavens, 


The Former of the earth, and its Maker; 


It was He that established it ; 


He did not create it in vain ; 


He formed it to be inhabited : 


I am Jehovah, and there is none else. 


19 


I have not spoken in secret, in a dark place of the earth; 


I have not said to the seed of Jacob, Seek ye me in vain. 
I, Jehovah, give utterance to righteousness ; 


I declare things that are right. 


20 Assemble and come; 


Draw near together, ye of the nations that have escaped ; 
They have no knowledge that carry about their wooden idol ; 


15. In this verse, the church ad- 
mires the mysterious character of the 
Divine counsels and modes of action, 
with special reference to the captivity 
and restoration. Comp. Rom, x1. 33; 
Deut. xxix. 29. 

16. From the time of the conquest 
of Babylon, idolatry began to decline ; 
and shortly after the Christian era, in 
consequence of the spread of the 
Gospel, it disappeared from the best 
portions of Asia, Africa, and Europe. 

17. This verse forms an antithesis 
to the preceding, and teaches that 
those who serve the true God shall 
never be deprived of his protection 
and favour. 

18. There seems to be here a spe- 
cial reference to the deserted state of 
the Holy Land during the captivity, 
while, at the same time, the sole 
divinity of Jehovah is re-asserted. 

19. An appeal to the publicity and 
perspicuity with which the Divine 


predictions had been ‘announced ; 
with manifest reference to the re- 
sponses of the heathen oracles, which 
were given from deep and obscure 
caverns, or the hidden recesses of 
temples: and were, at the best, artful 
and equivocal; and, in cases of ex- 
treme difficulty, were altogether with- 
held. See my Lectures on Divine 
Inspiration, pp. 251, 252, 555. The 
prophets of Jehovah exercised their 
ministry in public, before all classes ; 
they foretold contingent future events 
in language the most explicit and 
unambiguous ; and, committing their 
predictions to writing, deposited them 
in the hands of the nation, as vouchers 
for their Divine commission. Comp. 
John xviii. 20. prs and oD are 
synonymes. 

20—22. The idolaters are now ad- 
dressed; the folly of their idolatry is 
pointed out; the claims of Jehovah, 
as the only God, are asserted; and 


360 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XLV. 


That pray to a god that cannot save. 


21 Declare ye, and draw near ; 


Let them also hold consultation ; 


Who published this of old? 


Who declared it from ancient times ? 
Was it not I, Jehovah ? for besides me there is no God ; 
The righteous God, and the Saviour : 


There is none besides me. 


All ye ends of the earth; 


‘Turn unto me, that ye may be saved, 


For I am God, and there is none else. 


28 By myself have I sworn; 


The word hath proceeded from my mouth ; 
It is truth, and shail not return: 
That to me every knee shall bend, 


Every tongue shall swear. 
24 


strength ; 
To Him he shall come ; 


And all shall be put to shame 


a call is given to them to turn from 
their vain objects of confidence to Him 
as their Creator and Portion. That 
ora ΘΒ, the escaped of the nations, 
means such of the heathen as had 
escaped the devastating wars that 
were carried on in different parts, and 
not the Jews, is evident from the wsus 
loquendi. See Judg. xii. 4, 5; Obad. 
14. On being obliged to flee, the 
idolaters carried about their idols 
with them from place to place ; none 
of which had either announced the 
fall of Babylon, or delivered their 
votaries in the hour of distress. 
Jehovah had done both to the people 
of the Jews. ᾿ 

23—25, These verses describe ἃ 
period when the knowledge and wor- 
ship of the true God should be 
universal. To mark its importance 
and certainty, the prediction is in- 
troduced by a solemn Divine oath, 
Comp. Jer. xxii. 5; Amos vi. 8; 
Heb. vi. 13. None who admit the 
inspired authority of Paul can doubt 
that there is here a primary and 


Only in Jehovah, shall each say, have I righteousness and 


direct reference to the Messiah. See 
Rom. xiv. 11, and Phil. ii. 10, 11. To 
Him, according to the Apostle’s doc- 
trine, universal religious homage and 
submission are due—such homage and 
submission as it would be idolatry to 
render to a mere creature. His is the 
ὄνομα τὸ ὑπὲρ πᾶν ὄνομα--- ΚΎΡΙΟΣ, 
mim, the Incommunicable Name of the 
Self-Existent Deity. He is the ΘΕΟΣ 
to whom all are responsible for their 
actions, as the close connexion be- 
tween the verses Rom. xiv. 11 and 12 
clearly proves. In the present pas- 
sage, which the apostle expressly 
quotes with his usual formula γέγραπ- 
ται yap, He is presented to view as 
the Object of universal worship, the 
Source of righteousness and strength 


.to his people, and the Inflictor of 


punishment upon his enemies. The 
nominative to XZ? is 123; but as it 
is preceded by ΠΣ, it must be 
regarded as having this for its object ; 
and the sense is best given by taking 
up the latter term separately in the 
acceptation, fruth, true, ἕο. Comp. 


CHAP. ΧΙΥ1.} 


ISATAH. 


361 


That are incensed against Him, 
25 In Jehovah shall all the seed of Israel be justified, 


And shall make their boast. 


the Arab. (30, verar, veritas. Vi- 


tringa, Dathe, Gesenius, Hitzig, and 
others, render 128 Ὁ, shall say of me; 
but the immediate occurrence of 772 
before » makes such construction 
harsh and unnatural, I have there- 
fore retained the common rendering 
of ὁ, there is to me, or I have. The 
verb is used, as frequently, in an 
impersonal sense. MpTz, righteousness, 
is the plural of excellence or emi- 
nence ; signifying ¢he most distinguished 


righteousness,—the Pauline δικαιοσύνη 
Θεοῦ, Rom. i. 17, 111. 21, 22 ; ἡ ἐκ Θεοῦ 
δικαιοσύνη, Phil. iii. 9; and the Petrine 
δικαιοσύνη τοῦ Θεοῦ ἡμῶν καὶ Σωτῆρος 
Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ. Comp. also chap. li. 
Oo Jers Skil, Os ΕΟ ἘΠ 9:1 
Cor. i. 30. Since the scene here 
described embraces the whole human 
family, it is obvious we are to under- 
stand by x1 YH, not the natural, but 
the spiritual posterity of the patriarch, 
whether Jews or Gentiles. Comp. 
Rom. iv. 12—17 ; Gal. iii, 26—29. 


CHAPTER XLVI. 


Isaiah here predicts the downfal of the Babylonian idols, as involved in that 
of the city; shews their utter impotence, with which he contrasts the 
power and care of Jehovah, that had been all along experienced by the 
Jews, 1—4; exposes, in his usual forcible and elegant manner, the absurdity 
of idolatry, 5—7 ; asserts the sole claims of the true God, on the ground of 
the miracles and prophecies with which the Jewish church had long been 
conversant, 8—10 ; repeats the announcement respecting the deliverance to 
be effected by Cyrus, 11; and addresses a pointed expostulation to such of 
the Jewish captives as might have hardened themselves in sin, 12, 13. 


1 Bet boweth down; Nebo stoopeth ; 


1. 73, Bel, the principal god of the 
Babylonians, “Sacratissimum Assyri- 
orum Deum,” Plin. Hist. Nat. 37, 55. 
Διὸς, ὃν καλοῦσιν οἱ Βαβυλώνιοι Βῆλον. 
Diod. Sic. ii. 8. The name is a con- 
traction of 73, the Chaldee pronuncia- 


| tion of the Pheenician, ὅν, Baal. He 


was called Ζεὺς, and Jupiter, by the 
Greeks and Romans, and is supposed 
by some to have been the symbol of 
the sun; by others, of the planet 


Jupiter. The worship of this planet, 


under the name of \Wu>, certainly 


formed part of the idolatrous rites of 
the Sabeans. See Norberg’s Onomast. 
p. 28. He had a temple erected to 
him, the ruins of which are still 
visible in the Birs Nimrood, described 
by Mr. Rich, Sir Robt. Ker Porter, and 
other travellers. See on chap. xiii, 1. 
According to Herodotus, it (Διὸς Βήλου 


362 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XLVI. 


Their idols are laid on the beasts and the cattle ; 
What were borne by you are made into loads, 


A burden to the weary beast. 


2 They stoop, they bow down together ; 
They are not able to deliver the burden ; 
Yea, themselves go into captivity. 

3 Hearken to me, O house of Jacob! 
And all the remnant of the house of Israel ! 
That have been borne from the belly, 
That have been carried from the womb. 

4 Even to old age I will be the same; 
Even to gray hairs will I carry you: 


ἱρὸν) stood on the summit of the top- 
most of eight towers, the ascent of 
which was on the outside ; the height 
of the whole has been computed at 
five hundred feet. In the temple was 
a large handsome couch, and near it a 
golden table, but no statue. Within 
the precincts of the temple, however, 
on the ground, was another sacred 
edifice, within which was an immense 
golden statue of Jupiter, ἄγαλμα μέγα 
Tov Atos ἔνι κατήμενον χρύσεον. Around 
this statue were large tables, which, 
with the steps and throne, were all of 
gold ; amounting, according to the 
estimate of the Chaldeans, to eight 
hundred talents in weight. There was 
also a golden altar outside this edifice, 
and another large altar on which sacri- 
fices were offered. Shortly before the 
time of Herodotus, there had been in 
the sacred enclosure a statue, which 
the Chaldeeans affirmed to have been 
of solid gold, and twelve cubits in 
height. Herod. 1, 181, 182. The high 
veneration in which Belus was held 
appears from the frequent use of his 
name in compound names of persons 
living in Babylon, as Baladan, Belte- 
shaezar, Belshazzar, Belesis, Belibus, &e. 
\23, Nebo, the other idol here specified, 
is supposed to have been the symbol 
of the planet Mercury, the celestial 
scribe and interpreter of the gods, 
corresponding to Hermes and Anubis, 
of the Egyptians. He was likewise 
worshipped by the Sabzeans, in Arabia. 
See Norberg’s Onomast. p. 95. Gese- 
nius traces the name in 3, prophet, 


an interpreter of the Divine will. It 
is likewise found in many compound 
proper names, as Wadbonasser, Nebu- 
chadnezzar, Nebushasban, &c. — The 
prophet describes the fall and re- 
moval of the Babylonian idols in 
language of the keenest satire. They 
had formerly been carried about by 
the priests in solemn procession, but 
should now be broken in pieces, and 
borne away by the enemy on the backs 
of beasts of burden; which, sinking 
down under the weight, they should 
not be able to relieve. Nothing was 
more natural than the plunder of the 
temples, on account of the riches they 
contained, especialiy the gold and 
silver images. History makes no 
mention of Cyrus having removed the 
Babylonian idols ; but both Herodotus, 
i. 183, and Arrian, vii. 19, 2, state that 
Xerxes took away the large golden 
statue above described. At πρὸ su- 
baud. 272 or m7. 


2. The weary beasts fall under the — 


load of idols, none of which is able to 
help them up. 052, their soul, is a 
periphrasis for 727, they. Comp. Hos. 
ix. 4, e¢ freg. Crusius, however, thinks 
that the prophet may have used the 
term 5}, sow/, sarcastically of the 
idols, ‘‘ cum anima propria dicta et 
vita carerent.” Hypomn. ad Theolog. 
Prophet. iii. p. 424. 

3, 4. Instead of bearing their God, 
the Jews had been graciously borne by 
him from the earliest period of their 
history; and he would continue to 
care for and support them to the last 


CHAP. XLVI.] 


I have made, and I will bear, 


ISATAH. 


363 


Yea, I will carry, and deliver you. 
5 ΤῸ whom can ye liken me, or make me equal? 
Or compare me, that we may be like ? 
6 They lavish gold out of the bag, 
And weigh silver in the balance ; 
They hire a goldsmith, that he may make it a god : 
They fall down, yea they worship him. 
7 They lift him upon their shoulder ; 


They carry him about; 


They set him down also in his place, and he standeth ; 
From his place he will not move: 
Yea, they may each cry to him, but he will not answer ; 
Nor at all deliver him from his trouble. 
8 Remember this, and shew yourselves men ; 
Recall it to mind, ye apostates ! 
9 Remember the former things, of old time, 
For 1 am God, and there is none else ; 
I am God, and there is none like me: 


10 


Declaring the end from the beginning, 


Even from ancient time things not yet done ; 
Saying, My purpose shall stand, 


—being the immutable Jehovah. 
After Dar subaud. 299, by me, 
which would have been inserted, but 
for the Ὁ following. Comp. Deut, i. 
Sy ext. 11, 12. 

5. Comp. chap. xl. 18, 25. 

6, 7. The use of the verb ™, Zo 
lavish, pour out abundantly, is very 
appropriate in application to the idols 
of Babylon, many of which appear to 
have been of the most costly descrip- 
tion. See Dan. iii. 1, and above, ver. 
1. The participle is here used for the 
finite verb. The picture given of the 
stupid conduct of the idol-worshippers 
is exceedingly striking, and drawn 
quite to the life. Comp. chap. xl. 19, 
90, xli. 6, 7, xliv. 9—19; Jer. x. 3—5. 

8. Different interpretations have 
been given of the ἅπαξ λεγ., TUNNT ; 
but the most approved is that which 
treats it as a denominative from tx, 
a man. \t thus corresponds in form 
to ἀνδρίζεσθε, 1 Cor. xvi..13, though 
the apostle uses the Greek word in 


the sense of acting a brave or cou- 
rageous part; whereas, what Isaiah 
means is, to act a manly and rational 
part, in opposition to the absurd con- 
duct of idolaters. Comp. 1 Cor. xiv. 


20. Thus the Syr, οἱ δ], de intelli- 


gent, act like intelligent beings. Kimchi, 
Yaw NN IY NW NTI NA OWIN wo, Be 
men and not beasts, which neither under- 
stand, nor consider. 'The Conjug. is 
Hithpalel, like j33n7 from 73. In 
Jer. 1. 38, the Babylonians are said to 
have been mad upon idols. 

9. Jehovah here appeals to his 
miraculous interposition on behalf of 
the Jews in ancient times, especially 
the stupendous miracles which he had 
wrought in Egypt. 

10, Ancient predictions of contin- 
gent events in the remote future, 
likewise evinced the proper deity of 
Israel’s God. Some of these had been 
announced from the earliest periods 


564 


11 


12 


13 


ISATAH. [CHAP. XLVII. 


And I will do all my pleasure: 

Calling from the east, the eagle ; 

From a distant land, the man whom I have appointed ; 
I have spoken it, I will also bring it to pass ; 

I have purposed it, I will also do it. 

Hearken to me, ye stubborn in heart ; 

Ye that are far from righteousness. 

I bring near my righteousness ; it shall not be far off; 
And my salvation shall not tarry ; 


Yea, I will appoint salvation in Zion, 


For Israel my glory. 


of time, and were recorded in the 
public documents of the Jewish nation. 
Comp. chap. xli, 22, 23, xliii. 9, xliv. 


11. MY, ἀετὸς, a bird of prey, and 
specially ¢he eagle, so called from the 
impetuosity with which he rushes on 


his prey ; Arab. blé, irritavit, ingressus 
seu demersus fuit ; Luc, vehementia. 


my or DY, fo rush upon. Cyrus is so 
called on account of the rapid and 
astounding character of his conquests. 
Comp. Jer. xlvili. 40; Ezek. xvii. 8 ; 
Hos! yi, 1 Hab. 1. 8: (It 15 not 5 
little remarkable that Cyrus is the 
first of whom we read that introduced 
the eagle as a military ensign: Ἢν δὲ 
αὐτῷ σημεῖον ἀετὸς χρυσοῦς ἐπὶ δόρατος 
μακροῦ ἀνατεταμένος" καὶ νῦν δὲ τοῦτο 
ἔτι σημεῖον τῷ Περσῶν βασιλεῖ διαμένει. 
_ Cyropeed. vii. near the beginning. For 
“inzy, the Keri and numerous MSS. 
read Ὧν, which is supported by the 
ancient versions; By ‘ney wx is not 
meant the man.who is to execute my 


purpose, but the man who is the object 
of my purpose, the instrument whom 
Ihave destined to be the deliverer of 
my people. ZAwinglius, Quicquid con- 
stituero. 

12, 13. 32 ἼΞΝ, French, 165 esprits 
forts ; infidel, obstinate ; Symm. σκλη- 
ροκάρδιοι. There seems to be here a 
momentary transition to a greater 
deliverance than that from Babylon, 
but for which the latter was to be 
preparatory. The persons addressed 
did not believe in the possibility of 
their restoration to Judea: Jehovah 
declares that he would effect a still 
more wonderful work—that of re- 
demption through the Messiah, in 
consequence of whose righteousness 
there would be in Zion that salvation 
which would be the glory or beauty of 
all believers. Comp. chap. xxviii. 14, 
as glanced at by Paul, Acts xii. 41. 
‘omen, my splendour, 1.e. the splen- 
dour which comes from me,” Gesenius ; 
but comp. John xvii. 10; 2 Thess, 
1 LO, 


CHAPTER XLVII. 


The subject with which the preceding chapter commenced is continued in 
this: viz. the destruction of Babylon, Under the personification of a 
delicate, voluptuous, and powerful princess, that city is ordered to descend 


CHAP. XLVII. | 


ISATAH. 


365 


from her throne, take the place of a slave, and disappear from the political 
horizon, 1—5. Her principal crimes are specified, and condign punishment 
is threatened, which all the power of astrology, divination, and magic, should 


not be able to avert, 6—15. 


1 Come down, and sit in the dust, O virgin-daughter of Babylon! 
Sit on the ground, without a throne, O daughter of the Chaldeans! 
For thou shalt no longer be called tender and delicate. 

2 Take the mill-stones, and grind meal ; 

Raise thy veil, lift up the train ; 
Uncover the leg; wade through the rivers. 

3 Thy nakedness shall be exposed, 


And thy shame shall be seen ; 


I will take vengeance, and spare no man. 


4 As for our Redeemer ; 


Jehovah of Hosts is his name, 


The Holy One of Israel. 


1. The Orientals are accustomed to 
speak of cities or empires that have 
never been conquered, as virgins ; see 
on chap. xxiii. 12, where ΝΣ na nana, 
virgin-daughter of Zidon, corresponds to 
aaa na nana, virgin-daughter of Babylon. 
By daughter is meant the people or 
inhabitants. For the idiom, to be 
called, meaning to be, see chap. i. 26. 
27, here and ver. 5, is used instead 
of 8772. The third plural is often to 
be taken impersonally, and is best 
rendered by our passive. The inha- 
bitants of Babylon were notorious for 
their luxury, effeminacy, and carnal 
indulgences. See Herodot. i, 195, 
199 ; Curtius, v. 3. 

2. The mill here referred to is a 
hand-mill resembling the Scotch quern, 
and consisting of an upper and a lower 
stone, the latter of which is fixed, and 
the former is made to move round 
upon it by means of a handle. The 
work of grinding is very laborious, 
and, in the East, is confined to female 
slaves, or other females in low circum- 
stances. Burckhardt, speaking of the 
inhabitants of Medina and its vicinity, 
says: “The women of the cultivators, 
and of the inhabitants of the suburbs, 
serve in the families of the towns- 
people as domestics, principally to grind 


corn in the hand-mills.”’ Travels in 
Arabia, vol. ii. p. 265. Comp. Exod. 
xi. 5, xii. 29: Job xxxi. 10; Matt, 
xxiv. 41: δύο ἀλήθουσαι ἐν τῷ μυλῶνι 5 
Nidda, fol. 6, 2, “duee mulheres mo- 
lentes molis mulinariis ;” where re- 
ference is had to the usual custom of 
two slaves being employed together 
at the hand-mill. Homer's Odyss. vii. 
103, 104, xx. 105—108. The whole 
verse graphically describes a degraded 
and miserable state of captivity. 

3. 22 signifies to meet either in a 
friendly, or 10 a hostile manner. Here, 
from the connexion, the meaning ob- 
viously is, meeting and treating any one 
kindly, sparing, &c. The idea of peti- 
tioning, supplicating, &ec., is, in such 
case, commonly implied. ZAwinglius, 
“ intercedar, pro flecti me patiar.’” Mus- 
culus thinks there is an ellipsis of 3 
before O78, and interprets, “1 will not 
meet thee as aman, but as God, whom 
none can resist ;” and this Kocher 
and others approve. 

4. This verse is inserted parenthe- 
tically with great effect. It contains 
the joyous and triumphant language 
of the believing Jews recognising In 
Jehovah their Almighty Deliverer. 
2983 is the Nom. absol. 


ZZ 


866 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XLVII. 


5 Sit thou in silence; yea, go into darkness, O daughter of the 


Chaldeans ; 


For thou shalt no more be called, The Mistress of Kingdoms. 


6 I was angry with my people ; 
I profaned my inheritance, 


And delivered them into thy hand : 
Thou shewedst them no mercy ; 
Upon the aged didst thou very heavily lay thy yoke. 
7 Thou saidst also, I shall be Mistress for ever, 
So that thou didst not lay these things to thy heart ; 
Thou didst not reflect on their end. 
8 Now, therefore, hear this, O thou voluptuous one ! 


That dwellest securely ; 
She that saith in her heart, 


I am, and there is none besides me; 


5. Silence and darkness characterise 
a state of imprisonment. Captives 
were usually shut up in dark dungeons, 
far removed from the noisy scenes of 
life. Comp. xlii. 7; Lam. ii. 10, iii. 2. 
Babylon is here called nixd29 n33, the 
Mistress of Kingdoms, because of the 
great number of kingdoms which she 
conquered, and over which she ruled, 
or which were tributary to her. Comp. 
Dan. ii. 37, 38, iv. 1. Her condition 
was now to be completely reversed: 
she was herself to be a captive. 

6. For the latter half of the verse, 
comp. Jer. 1. 17; li. 34; Lam. iv. 16, 
v. 12; Zech. i. 15. Gesenius refers 
i to the advanced or aged state of 
the Jewish nation ; but the connexion 
shews that, literally, old and infirm 
persons are meant. 

7. Ἢ must either have the Athnach 
transferred to it, and be connected 
with 7723; or it must be construed 
with "2X, and thus will mark the 
degree of pride and security in which 
Babylon indulged : so as not to lay, &e., 
or, adeo ut, usque adeo ut, or, on to such 
a degree ; which expresses the radical 
idea of progress, &c., inherent in 77Y. 
Two or three MSS. read x. The word 
isnot expressed in the ancient versions. 
mx, these things, and a, it, in AD ITY, 
refer to the conduct of Babylon: the 
Fem. gender being frequently em- 
ployed to express the Collective 


Neuter. Inattention to this circum- 
stance, and to the force of the paral- 
lelism, has originated the reading 
yo IK, which is found in eighteen 
MSS., and originally in two more, in 
the margin or appendix of two printed 
Edd., and in the Vulg. 

8. The security of the Babylonians 
is thus described by Xenophon: “'The 
inhabitants of the city'could not but 
laugh at his (Cyrus’s) intention of 
besieging them; and knowing that 
they had provisions for more than 
twenty years, they treated the attempt 
with mockery.” Cyrop. vii. 5. For 
the natural strength of the city, see 
on chap. xiii. 1, Zwinglius justly 
observes on "38, J,as here used: “valde 
emphaticé pro Ego una, aut Ego sola, 
sum scilicet hera,” DB, lit. nothing of 
me, i.@.none possessing my prowess, 
riches, enjoyments, &c. It seems 
better thus to resolve the Yod, than 
to regard it as merely Paragogic. The 
same form occurs ver. 10, and Zeph. 
ii. 15. Others take iy ΒΝ to be in 
construction. The meaning is the 
same either way. Comp. Martial, lib. 
xii. epigr. 8, “ Terrarum dea gentium- 
que, Roma, cui par est nihil, et nihil 
secundum ;” in connexion with Rev. 
xvii. 18, where the language of these 
verses is applied to the N. T. Babylon ; 
and still more fully, xviii. 7,8. The 
metaphor of a virgin is now exchanged 


CHAP. XLVII.| 


I shall not dwell a widow, 


ISATAH 


367 


Nor know what it is to be childless. 
9 There shall even come upon thee both of these, 


Suddenly, in one day, 


Loss of children, and widowhood : 

They shall come upon thee in their perfection ; 
In spite of thy numerous sorceries ; 

In spite of the vast number of thy spells. 


10 


Thou didst also trust in thy wickedness ; 
Thou saidst, No one seeth me: 


Thy wisdom and thy science have turned thee away ; 
And thou saidst in thy heart, I am, and there is none besides me. 


ΠῚ 


Therefore shall evil come upon thee ; 


Thou shalt know no dawn after it ; 


for that of a married woman, in order 
to admit of the introduction of a state 
of widowhood, and drexvia. To this 
state Babylon was reduced when her 
king was slain, and her inhabitants 
were either massacred, or carried away 
captive. Comp. liv. 1,4; Lam.i.1; 
Isa. 11. 18—20. 

9. The sudden and unexpected at- 
tack of Cyrus is here specially set 
forth. See on chap. xxi. 9. That the 
Babylonians were greatly addicted to 
magic, appears not only from this 
verse and ver. 12, but also from Dan. 
i, 20, ii. 2, 10, iv. 7, v.11, &. Comp. 
Diod. Sic. lib. ii. 053, from 723, Arab. 


᾿ ᾿ 4, . . . ΄ 
AERA » detexit, revelavit, manifestavit ; 


CAs , detectus, revelatus; keublKe, 
ecstasis ; persons who, by magical arts, 
pretended to reveal the fortunes of 
empires, individuals, ἕο. Thus, Ibn 
Batuta, speaking of the Mohammedan 
saints, who pretended to reveal the 


future, calls them, peg Ws,d), 
p.9. This etymology seems preferable 
to that adopted by Bertholdt and 
Miinter, who derive it from Wau, 


scidit pannum, obscuravit, eclipsi affecit, 
though there can be no doubt that they 
employed eclipses for the same purpose. 
Gesenius and Winer trace the word to 


the Syr. pis in Ethpaal, ¢o sup- 


plicate, celebrate acts of worship, &ce., 
which may well agree with the 
theurgic ceremonies of the Oriental 
incantators. By D737 are meant spells 
or charms, by which those who were 
the dupes of them were downd ; from 
7, to bind, bind fast with spells. 
Gesenius thinks the term denotes a 
species of magic, practised by binding 
magic knots; ver. 13. in 443, ὅζο,, 15 
not to be rendered with or through, but 
has a negative signification, such as 
nevertheless, notwithstanding, in spite of, 
&c. Comp. Numb. xiv.11 ; Job. i. 22. 
Thus Calvin, zon obstante. None of 
all the numerous sorceries of Babylon 
should be able to afford her the least 
assistance. Md¥Y is properly in con- 
struction with 189, used substantively. 
7220 indeed intervenes, but this is not 
more abhorrent from the genius of 
the language, than the interruption of 
direct construction by prepositions, 
conjunctions, &e. See Gesen. Lehrgeb. 
p. 679. 

10, Babylon was proud, not only of 
her political wisdom, but also of her 
astronomical and mythological science. 
NYT, γνῶσις, in connexion, as here, with 
7237, superior knowledge, i. e. that of 
the gods, &c. 221% is used both in 
a good and a bad sense ; here, as lvii. 
17, it indicates a determined apostasy 
from the true God. 

11. πρὸ, in this verse corresponds 
to JOP. in ver. 10. WYN, its duwn, i.e. 
the commencement of a period of 


368 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XLYII. 


Yea, calamity shall overwhelm thee, 

Which thou shalt not be able by expiation to remove ; 
There shall even come upon thee suddenly, 

Desolation of which thou shalt not be aware. 


12 


Persevere now with thy spells ; 


And with the multitude of thy sorceries, 
With which thou hast toiled from thy youth : 
Perhaps thou mayest profit by them ; 


Perhaps thou mayest resist. 
13 


Thou art wearied with the multitude of thy counsels : 


Let the dividers of the heavens, the astrologers, 
The prognosticators at the new moons, 


Stand up now, and save thee 


From the things that shall come upon thee. 
14 Behold! they shall be as stubble ; 


succeeding prosperity ; the morning, 
figuratively considered, after a night 
of calamity. See on chap. viii. 20. 
The following member of the paral- 
lelism confirms this interpretation, 
which indeed might be considered as 
sufficiently justified from the incon- 
gruity of representing affliction as 
dawning upon any one. 3, 70 cover, 
atone for, remove, avert by expiation, &e. 

12. The language ofirony. By “the 
youth” of Babylon is meant the 
earliest periods of her political exist- 
ence. It is generally allowed, that 
whatever admixtures of Egyptian 
superstition were found in the religion 
of the Babylonians, the Chaldeans 
possessed an original system of philo- 
sophy and learning ; on which account 
they are spoken of as a distinct class, 
Dan. ii. 2, 10, &e. Their astronomical 
observations appear to date from a 
remote antiquity. Ptolemy mentions 
two lunar eclipses observed by them 
about 700 years B.c. YW is here used 


like the Arab. 2° , adversus occurrit ; 


Conj. IIL. obstitit, restitit. 

13. Pox», for POY ; most probably 
to make it agree in sound with 7127 
and 7ppw>, ver. 12. But comp. Ps. ix. 
5; Ezek. xxxv. 11. 125, ἡ, 6. as the 
Keri ordains, bm 14, the dividers of 


the heavens, from the Arab. 94 , concrdit, 


secuit, to cut or divide into large parts, 
with obvious reference to the division 
of the zodiac into twelve signs, in 
connexion with which the Chaldzean 
astronomers carried on the practice of 
judicialastrology. LXX. οἱ ἀστρολόγοι 
τοῦ οὐρανοῦ. Vulg.auguresceli. Some 
MSS. and Edd. read "27 or 737; but 
these readings have probably origi- 
nated in some copyist recollecting that 
D217 occurred in the preceding verses. 
D722 OWT, who see, 1. 6. predict future 
events, destinies, ὅσο, dy means of the 
stars. iT is a seer, or prophet; ap- 
plied here to the Chaldzan astrologers, 
who divined by the rising and setting, 
the motions, aspects, colour, degree of 
light, &c., of the stars. They main- 
tained that the stars had an influence 
over the nativities of men. The ?in 
own denotes time, as 7722, 2709, &e. 
It would appear that the astronomers 
at Babylon published a monthly table 
of the leadmg events that might be 
expected to happen. x2 connects 
more naturally with yy, though re- 
mote in point of position, than with 
orn, The partitive use of }2 does 
not well apply here. 

14, 15. The utter destruction of 
the astronomical and magical societies 
of Babylon is here predicted. The 
persons composing them, so far from 
contributing by their science or arts 
to rescue those who had been accus- 


CHAP. XLVIII.| 


The fire shall burn them up ; 


ISAIAH. 


369 


They shall not deliver themselves from the power of the flame ; 
It shall not be a coal to warm one ; 


Nor a fire before which to sit. 


15 Thus shall they be to thee, for whom thou hast toiled, 
Those with whom thou hast dealt from thy youth ; 
They shall wander, each to his quarter : 


None shall save thee. 


tomed to consult them, should not be 
able to deliver themselves, but should 
either perish in the catastrophe, or 
betake themselves to flight. The 
images are very expressive. The fire 
was not to be for ordinary purposes, 
but an all-devouring flame. It has 
been queried, whether by ΤῸ in this 
place, we are to understand merchants 


in the literal acceptation of the term ; 
or the astrologers, &c., who traversed 
the country, practising their super- 
stitious arts for gain. The latter 
seems the more probable. ‘29, 
straight before him. Comp. V22 722°Rx, 
Ezek. 1. 9, 12, of λοιπ. eis τὸ πέραν 
ἑαυτοῦ. 


CHAPTER ΧΊ ΤΠ. 


In this chapter the Jews are reproved for their hypocrisy and formality, 1, 2 ; 
their obstinate addictedness to idolatry, notwithstanding the proofs which 
they had of the Divine existence, is forcibly set forth, 3—8 ; the design of 
the captivity, and the instrument by which their deliverance from it was to 


be effected, are pointed out, 9—15 ; 


a powerful appeal to their conscience 


and feelings is then made by the Messiah, 16—19 ; and an exhortation is 
given to them to avail themselves of the opportunity afforded them in the 
providence of God to return to Judea with security and comfort, 20, 21 ; 
accompanied with a warning to such as persisted in rebellion, 22, 


1 Hear this, O house of Jacob! 


Ye that are called by the name of Israel ; 
And have come forth from the waters of Judah ! 
That swear by the name of Jehovah, 


1, 2. THT "99. Comp. Numb. xxiv. 7; 
Ps. Ixviii. 26 (Hebr. 27) ; Rev. viii. 10. 
Nations are by the Orientals compared 
to rivers, of which the progenitors 
are the fountains. Ὁ, which is the 
reading of thirty-nine MSS. and four 


early editions, is not designed, as 
Lowth thinks, to express from the days, 
but is merely the reduplicate form of 
2; see Exod. vii. 19, viii. 2. For 
wp vy, the Holy City, comp. Neh. xi. 
1; Dan. ix. 24: Matt. iv. 5, xxvii. 53; 


370 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XLVIII. 


And make mention of the God of Israel ; 


But not truly nor justly. 


2 For they call themselves of the holy city, 
And stay themselves upon the God of Israel : 


Jehovah of Hosts is his name. 


3 The former events I declared long ago ; 
Yea, from my mouth they proceeded ; and I made them known ; 
I effected them suddenly, and they came to pass. 

4 I knew that thou art stubborn; 
That thy neck is a bar of iron; 


And thy brow brass. 


5 Therefore I declared them to thee long ago; 

Before they came to pass I made them known to thee ; 

Lest thou shouldst say, My idol effected them ; 

Or, My graven image, and my molten image commanded them. 
6 Thou hast heard them ; view them all ; 


And should ye not declare it ? 


Henceforth I publish to thee new events, 

Even hidden things, which thou hast not known. 
7 They are produced now, and not long ago ; 

At no former period didst thou hear of them ; 

Lest thou shouldest say, Behold! I knew them. 
8 Yea, thou heardest not; yea, thou knewest not ; 


the inscription on the Maccabean coins, 
mop ow, Jerusalem the Holy; and 


the Arab. (wid ew, dist, by 
which name she is still commonly 
known all over the East. 

* 3. ΤΆ 15 generally thought that there 
is here a reference to the predictions 
respecting Sennacherib, to the events 
connected with whose discomfiture 
DxNB aptly applies. 

4, nym, it is of my knowledge, 
i.e. part of it; I know with certainty. 
πῶ stands for 30 77, Ezek. iii. 7. 
Comp. as to sense, Exod. xxxii. 9; 
Ezek. ii. 4. Obstinate, audacious, and 
unblushing rebellion characterised the 
Jews as a people. 

5. The 1 at the beginning of this 
verse is inferential, marking what had 
been done in consequence of the Divine 
knowledge of the character of the 


Jews. That the Feminine in 8127 is 
to be taken as a Collective Neuter, is 
evident from the use of the plural 
affix Ὁ, immediately following. 

7. Sis here used in the sense of 
the miraculous production, not of events, 
but of the prophecies respecting them. 
The announcement of them was a 
creation of knowledge, as real as that 
of the universe was of matter, Gen. 
1.1.  DVv725) means before the day of 
their announcement, LXX. προτέραις 
ἡμέραις. The things themselves had 
no existence in the time of the prophet. 
The Chaldzans were not in possession 
of Babylon; and the Persians were a 
weak and inconsiderable power. They 
could not, by any possibility, have 
been anticipated by human sagacity. 

8. This verse describes the disin- 
clination of the Jews to attend to the 
Divine communications, rather than 


CHAP. XLVIII.] 


ISATAH. 


511 


Yea, thine ear was not opened to them long ago : 
For I knew that thou wast altogether faithless, 
And wast called rebellious from the belly. 
9 For my name’s sake 1 have deferred my anger, 
And for the sake of my praise I have restrained it from thee ; 


That I might not cut thee off. 
Behold! I have refined thee, but not as silver ; 


10 


I have tried thee in the furnace of affliction. 


11 


For my own sake, for my own sake, have I done it ; 


For how should my name be profaned ? 
My glory I will not give to another. 


12 


Hearken to me, O Jacob! and Israel, my called ! 


Iam He: I am the First; I also am the Last. 


13 


It was, indeed, my hand that founded the earth, 


And my right hand that expanded the heavens ; 
I called them; they stood forth at once. 
14 Assemble, all of you, and hear: 


their not having received them. mn» 
TR, to open the ear, means to disclose 
any thing to any one. The verb is 
here used intransitively, to denote 
being opened, receiving the revelation. 
nap, Pual of xp, fo call ; here idioma- 
tically, to de. Seeonchap.i.26. The 
period here specified was that of the 
deliverance from Egypt, “ ea liberatio 
fuit veluti queedam Kcclesize nativitas.” 
Calvin. From the very first the He- 
brew nation had been rebellious ; wit- 
ness their history in the wilderness. 
9—11. A beautiful exhibition of the 
goodness, longsuffering, and forbear- 
ance of Jehovah. Dum is here used 
with great effect. It properly signifies 
to muzzle; hence to subdue, restrain, 


&c.; Arab. eas, percussit im naso ; 


instruzit capistro camelum, &c. ; elas, 


capistrum. After the verb, ΝΞ is un- 
derstood ; as "2 is after ‘2. This 
ellipsis may seem harsh ; but it is not 
more so than many others which we 
meet with. It has been supplied by 
the LXX.,7r0 ἐμὸν ὄνομα, and in one of 
Kennicott’'s MSS. It would have 
derogated from the character of Je- 
hovah, in the eyes of the heathen, had 
he abandoned his people to utter 


destruction, and have been a tacit 
renunciation of those claims by which 
he is distinguished from all created 
objects. 023, the LXX., Michaelis, 
and others, render “ ox account of, for 
silver ;” not adverting to the circum- 
stance that 1 is often used in the 
acceptation of 3, like, in the manner of. 
See Zwinglius. Vulg. “quasi argen- 
tum.” Instead of 7m7a, two MSS. 
and the Syr. read 77303, which is 
doubtless a gloss, but conveys the pri- 
mary signification of 173. See Gesen, 


Lex. iz voc.; and comp. the Syr. 


pue> > exploravit, examinavit. 


12. Comp. xli. 4, xliv. 6. 

13. 70 seems to be a denominative, 
from mp0, the palm of the hand. 
Comp. ΠΕ, a palm, or hand-breadth ; 
omen, Lam. 11. 20, a bearing on the 
palms of the hands; hence to use 
the hand for smoothing, extending, 
stretching forth. Comp. the Arab. 


po , latum fecit, in latum duvit, ex- 


panditve ; ΣΝ » Calum; as Yi), ex- 
ΓΟ 


panse, from YP, to expand. 

14, Instead of 073, among them, 
twenty-seven MSS., originally nine 
more, now four ; the Soncin. and Brix. 


812 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. XLVIII. 


Which of them hath shewed these things ? 
Jehovah loved him; he will execute his purpose against 


Babylon, 


And be his arm against the Chaldeeans. 


15 


I, I have spoken it; I also have called him ; 


I have brought him ; and his way shall be prosperous. 


16 Draw near to me; hear this: 


I spake not in secret from the beginning ; 
From the time that it was, I was there : 
And now the Lord Jehovah hath sent me and his Spirit. 


editions, and the Syr.,read 023, among _ 


you. The reading of the Textus Re- 
ceptus is the more appropriate ; and 
the variation was doubtless occasioned 
by the suffix in 029) immediately 
before. The reference, in which Zwin- 
glius finds the language of contempt, 
is to the idols. The Nomin. to 1278 is 
Cyrus, understood. The love here 
spoken of is not pure affection or 
delight, but favour ; which may be 
shewn in various ways. The love or 
favour of God was shewn to Cyrus in 
his selecting him to be the distin- 
guished instrument of liberating the 
Jews, and giving him victory over the 
nations. “ Dilectio autem non sim- 
pliciter, sed πρὸς τὶ accipitur: ideoque 
ad felicem expeditionis eventum re- 
stringitur.’ Calvin. Comp. Rom. ix. 
lf. Before D2, the prepos. 3 is to 
be supplied from the preceding hemi- 
stich. 

15. This verse is expletive of the 
preceding, and presents Jehovah in 
the boldest contrast with the gods of 
the Chaldeans. 

16. Several commentators have at- 
tempted to vindicate the whole of this 
verse to Isaiah; but they have met 
with few abettors. Even Gesenius is 
forced to admit that, comparing the 
second member with chap. xlv. 19, 
Jehovah must be the speaker; and 
that the third cannot well be explained 
as the words of the prophet. He is, 
however, of opinion that the fourth 
member contains the language of the 
prophet. Thus also Zwinglius, Mus- 
culus, Calvin, Clarius, ν. ἃ. Palm, and 
others. On the other hand, Athana- 
sius, Augustine, Basil, Chrysostom, 


Procopius, Jerome, (colampadius, 
Castalio, Calovius, Schmidius, &c., in- 
terpret the words of the Logos, which 
certainly does not appear so harsh as 
to admit a change of person in the 
speaker. Indeed, the close connexion 
of 28 OW AMT ny and *yIw—NAY ren- 
ders such change next to impossible. 
The suffix in anv has ts, the begin- 
ning, for its antecedent; which, though 
masculine in form, is feminine in sig- 
nification. When tx and ἀρχὴ are 
put absolutely in Scripture, the com- 
mencement of created existence is 
meant. OW is here properly a tem- 
poral adverb. Comp. Prov. viii. 27, 
where it likewise follows Us, in appli- . 
cation to the commencement of time. 
Comp. for the doctrine,* 0 ἣν am’ ἀρχῆς, 
and Tov ἀπ᾽ ἀρχῆς, 1 Johni. 1, 1. 13, 
14. It has been disputed whether 
im, His Spirit, be the nominative or 
the accusative. The latter is, from 
the position of the word, the more 
natural ; and consequently the more 
probable. Thus Origen, though he 
admits that ἀμφίβολος ἔστιν ἡ λέξις, 
explains, ἀμφότερα ἀπέστειλεν 0 πατὴρ, 
τὸν σωτήρα καὶ τὸ ἅγιον πνεῦμα ; “the 
Father sent doth, the Saviour and the 
Holy Spirit ;” and he introduces the 
passage by stating that δεδήλωται, τέ is 
manifest from it, that the Holy Spirit, 
as well as Christ, was sent for the sal- 
vation of men. The meaning there- 
fore will be, that the Logos, in his 
mediating character as the Angel of 
Jehovah, received a special commission 
to interpose for the deliverance of his 
captive people; and the Holy Spirit 
was likewise sent to reveal, through 
the prophet, the joyful event. Such 


CHAP. XLVIII. | 


ISAIAH. 378 


17 Thus saith Jehovah thy Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel : 
I Jehovah, thy God, teach thee to profit ; 
I lead thee in the way thou shouldst go. 


18 


O that thou hadst hearkened to my commandments! 


Then should thy peace have been like a river ; 
And thy righteousness as the billows of the sea. 


19 


Thy seed also should have been as the sand thereof; 


And the offspring of thy bowels as that of its bowels ; 
Tt should not have been cut off; ἢ 
Neither should its name have been destroyed from my presence. 


20 


Depart ye out of Babylon; flee from the Chaldeans ; 


With the voice of joy shew this ; make it known ; 
Carry it forth to the end of the earth ; 
Say ye, Jehovah hath redeemed his servant Jacob. 


21 


For they thirsted not in the deserts through which he led them ; 


He caused water to flow out of the rock for them ; 
Yea, he clave the rock, and the water gushed out. 


22 


construction is quite in accordance 
with the mode of representation else- 
where employed in Scripture respect- 
ing the economy of the Divine opera- 
tions. 

17—19. If the Jews had attended 
to the Divine instructions with which 
they had been favoured, uninterrupted 
and abundant prosperity would have 
been their lot, instead of the calami- 
tous circumstances into which they 
had been plunged by their transgres- 
sions. 77 signifying here, as generally, 
the sand on the sea-shore, I have sup- 
plied a pronoun referring to 0%, in 
the preceding verse. ΓΙῸ is the 
same as DPD, dowels, only it is femi- 
nine, because used in a figurative 
sense. Before it, ἜΞΩ is understood 


There is no peace, saith Jehovah, to the wicked. 


as repeated, to signify the fishes which 
the sea produces. 

21. These words are not descriptive 
of what took place on the journey of 
the ancient Israelites through the 
wilderness, but describe in figurative 
language, borrowed from events which 
then took place, the copious supplies 
which the Jews should enjoy on their 
journey from Babylon to Judea. See 
Exod. xvii. 6.; Numb. xx. 11; Ps. 
Ixxviil. 15. 

22. A denunciation against such as 
should persist in rebellion and un- 
belief—preferring the pleasures of sin 
with the enemies of God, to the holy 
and spiritual enjoyments of his ser- 
vice. Comp. chap. lvii. 21. 


14 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. XLIX. 


CHAPTER XLIX. 


This chapter consists of two parts : the /irst relating to the Messiah, in which 
he calls the attention of the world to his appointment to be the Redeemer, 
not of the Jews only, 1—4, but also of the Gentiles, 5—13: the second re- 
presenting the desolate condition of Judea during the captivity, 14; the 
Divine compassion towards her, 15, 16 ; the certainty of the restoration of 
the Jews, and the immense number of the citizens, 17—21 ; the support 
rendered to them by foreign princes, 22, 23; the interposition of Jehovah 
for their rescue, and the destruction of their enemies, 24—26. 


1 HARKEN to me, ye maritime lands! 


And attend, ye distant people! 


_ Jehovah hath called me from the womb ; 

From my mother’s bowels he hath mentioned my name. 
2 He hath also made my mouth like a sharp sword ; 

Tn the shadow of his hand hath he concealed me ; 

Yea, he hath made me a polished arrow, 


He hath hid me in his quiver ; 


3 And hath said to me, Thou art my servant ; 


1. That Messiah is the speaker, is 
agreed among the great body of inter- 
preters. Attempts have, indeed, been 
made by the Rabbins, by Grotius, 
Koppe, and others, to explain the pas- 
sage of Isaiah himself; by Doéderlein, 
Paulus, Rosenmiiller, and Hitzig, of 
the Jewish nation ; by Gesenius, of 
his favourite prophetie order ; and by 
some of Cyrus. But their several 
hypotheses are clogged with difficul- 
ties, which they have themselves felt, 
or on the ground of which they have 
opposed and refuted each other. See 
on chap. xlii. 1, and Hengstenberg’s 
Christologie, i. Theil. 2 Abtheil. p. 
259, &c. The Messiah had been in- 
troduced, chap. xlvii. 16, declaring 
his commission to interpose for the 
deliverance of the Jews in Babylon: 
here he is presented in the higher 
character of a Spiritual Deliverer both 
of Jews and Gentiles. Though it is 
literally true that he received the 
name of Jesus while yet in the womb 


of the virgin, Luke ii. 21, yet the 
stress of the words seems to bear on 
his appointment to office by the 
Father, in opposition to its being self- 
assumed, Comp. Jer. 1. 5 ; Gal. i. 15. 

2. 7b, the mouth, is here, as freq., 
used for that which proceeds from it, 
speech, doctrine, ὅθ. The metaphors 
of a sword and an arrow, in the best 
state of preparation, aptly set forth 
the penetrating and subduing efficacy 
of the Gospel. Comp. Eccles. xii. 11 ; 
Heb. iv. 12; Rev. i. 16. Pindar, in 
like manner, employs the metaphor of 
the arrow, in application to powerful 
eloquence, Olymp. 11. 149, 160, ix. 17 ; 
and Gesenius quotes passages from 
the Life of Timur, tom. ii. p. 888, 
and p. 334, to the same effect. The 
concealment referred to is that of the 
Divine Redeemer previous to his 
manifestation in the flesh. 

3. Comp. xliv. 23. The occurrence 
of the term xt, /srae/, in this verse 
has occasioned considerable difficulty. 


CHAP. XLI1X.] 


ISAIAH. 


ald 


That in thee, O Israel! I may be glorified. 
4 But I said: I have toiled in vain; 
For nought and in vain have I exhausted my strength: 
Nevertheless, my cause is with Jehovah ; 
And my reward is with my God. 


5 And now saith Jehovah, 


That formed me from the womb to be his servant, 


To restore Jacob to him: 


Though Israel should not be gathered to him, 
Yet I shall be glorious in the sight of Jehovah, 
And my God shall be my praise. 
6 He also saith: It is too small a thing for thee to be my servant, 
To raise up the tribes of Jacob, 
And to restore the preserved of Israel ; 
I have also appointed thee to be a light to the nations, 
To be my salvation to the end of the earth. 


Michaelis and Gesenius hold it to be 
very suspicious ; and think it may 
have been introduced at an early 
period by some copyist, just as ᾿Ισραὴλ 
and Ἰακὼβ were by the LXX., in the 
parallel passage, chap. xlii. 1. It is 
actually wanting in Kennicott’s Cod. 
96. Saadias renders, My servant, 


Jy! pal dl ΤῸ Israel; making the 


Jewish people the objects of a special 
mission. Thus also Grotius and Dathe. 
Others are of opinion that there is 
an abrupt transition from the Servant 
of Jehovah, to those on whom his 
ministry was first of all destined to 
tell. And, indeed, by rendering Wx, 
that, in order that, this sense is most 
naturally brought out. Comp. for 
such use of 1x, as a relative conjunc- 
tion preceding the Fut., Gen. xi. 7; 
Numb. xxiii. 13; Deut. iv. 40, &c. 

4. The Messiah here complains of 
the fruitlessness of his labours among 
the Jews, but expresses his confidence 
in the righteous appointment of his 
Heavenly Father. 

5, 6. Such appointment is here defi- 
nitely announced. Though he should 
not be successful in ettecting the con- 
version of the Jews, yet Jehovah 
would glorify him, by making him the 
instrument of salvation to the world 


at large. Instead of )Dx. 8%, shall NOT 
be gathered, the Keri reads "Ps. , shall 
be gathered to Him: expressing, in a 
synonymous parallelism, the idea con- 
veyed by the preceding V8 3p¥” 2270), 
This alteration has the countenance 
of six MSS., three more originally, and 
now one; the LXX., Chald., and Aq. 
But the textual reading, which is sup- 
ported by the great mass of MSS., 
and has the suffrages of Symm., 
Theod., and the Vulg., agrees better 
with the following: since the Vaus in 
Ste) and 7228), correspond to each 
other, as though and yet. The Athnach 
should properly be at V2. 1¥, from my, 
to be strong, signifies glory, majesty, 
praise, when coupled with 133, or, as 
here, with 723, in Niphal. For ‘Ys3, 
the Keri has the participial form ‘32. 
The meaning is, such of the Jews as 
had been restored to their own land ; 
and the term corresponds to "22%, pre- 
ceding. The language clearly and ab- 
solutely excludes the idea, that by the 
“ Servant of Jehovah,” either the pro- 
phet or the people of Israel is in- 
tended. To maintain that Isaiah was 
to be the great teacher of the heathen 
(a2 ἦν), would be to maintain what 
is contrary to fact ; and no absurdity 
can be greater, than to suppose, that, 
though the Jews could not effect their 


316 


7 Thus saith Jehovah, 


ISAIAH. 


(CHAP. XLIX. 


The Redeemer of Israel, his Holy One, 
To him whom men despise, whom the nation abhorreth, 


To the servant of rulers: 


Kings shall behold, and stand up; 

Princes also, and shall worship ; 

For the sake of Jehovah, that is faithful, 

The Holy One of Israel, that hath chosen thee. 


8 Thus saith Jehovah: 
thee ; 


In an acceptable time I have answered 


And in the day of salvation I have helped thee ; 


And have preserved thee, and made thee a covenant for the 


people ; 


To raise up the earth, to cause the desolate possessions to be 


occupied : 


9 To say to the prisoners, Go forth! 
To them that are in darkness, Appear! 


They shall feed by the ways ; 


And on all the high places shall be their pasture. 


LO 


They shall not hunger, neither shall they thirst ; 


Neither shall the glowing heat, nor the sun smite them ; 
For He that hath mercy on them shall lead them, 


own recovery, they should, neverthe- 
less, be the active and _ successful 
agents in effecting the restoration of 
the world. Comp. for the doctrine of 
the text, chap. xlii. 6; Mal. i. 10, 11; 
Luke 11. 30—32 ; ‘Acts xill. 46, 47; 
Rom. xi. 11, 12. For ny, MY saloa- 
tion, two Konigsb. MSS., the LXX., 
Arab., and Acts xiii. 47, read my, 
salvation. Both forms occur elsewhere 
in the prophet. 

7—10. These verses describe the 
humiliation, and subsequent exalta- 
tion and administration of the Re- 
deemer. 5272 agrees so entirely 
with 12 299, that the rendering of the 
LXX., rov ἢ ἀν μοὺπα τὴν sre αὐτοῦ, 
“ who despiseth his life,” of which 
Michaelis approves, cannot be ad- 
mitted. 5] is here used collectively 
of men. Comp. Deut. xxiv. 7. ™3 is 
the Infin. taken as the Pahul Part. 
a, Ps. xxii. 7; and corresponds to 
23, chap. 111]. 3:—both passages being 


strictly parallel. 229 is a verbal noun, 
derived from Piel, and signifies ax 
object of abomination. or disgust. Ge- 
senius, however, in his Lexicon, retains 
the proper participial form, and ren- 
ders, “ causing abhorrence to the 
people,” z.e. who is an abhorrence to 
them. By 3, zation, is meant the 
Jewish, by which our Saviour was 
despised and rejected. Having ren- 
dered perfect obedience to the con- 
stituted authorities, the Redeemer 
might with all propriety be called 
“a servant of rulers,’ though the 
phrase may also have been designed 
to express his humiliation, as exhi- 
bited in his subjection to them. 
After 17m, supply ink, “shall wor- 
ship Him;” which the connexion 
obviously requires. The “ acceptable 
time,” and the “day of salvation,” 

mean the period of the New Dispen- 
sation, at the commencement of 
which the Messiah appeared, to effect 


-»- 


CHAP. XLIX. | 


ISAIAH. 


307 


And conduct them to fountains of water. 
11 I will also make all my mountains a way ; 
And my causeways shall be raised. 


12 


Behold! these shall come from far : 


And behold! these from the North, and from the West ; 
And these from the land of Sinim. 


13 


Sing, O heavens! and rejoice, O earth ! 


Burst, ye mountains, into song! 
For Jehovah comforteth his people, 
And hath compassion on his afflicted. 


14 


But Zion saith, Jehovah hath forsaken me, 


And, The Lord hath forgotten me. 


15 


the work of human redemption, and 
during which the blessings of that 
redemption are being communicated 
to mankind. Comp. 2 Cor. vi. 2. 
How he prayed, was heard, and 
helped, see Heb. v. 7; Matt. xxvi. 
39—44; Luke xxu. 41—44. The 
ninth verse clearly shews, that by 
the desolate possessions are not 
meant waste places in Judea, but the 
moral wastes in the Gentile world. 
Comp. chap. xli. 6, 7. Twenty-two 
of Kennicott and De Rossi’s MSS, 
aud six more originally, read 7x), 
instead of 70x. It is also the reading 
of several ancient editions, and has 
the support of the LXX., Arab., Syr., 
Vulg., and Targ. The rich provision 
made for the supply of the Gentile 
converts is beautifully described in 
metaphors borrowed from nomadic 
life. 

11. Every obstacle shall be re- 
moved, and every facility granted for 
conversion. 

12. The entrance of converts from 
the most distant quarters into the 
church is here specifically predicted. 
myD, Sinim, has been variously inter- 
preted. Aq., Symm., and Theod., 
retain the word σινείμ: the LXX. ἐκ 
γῆς Περσῶν. Michaelis, Déderlein, 
and others, Syeze, the southern bound- 
ary of Egypt; and Bochart, Pelusium, 
But there can no longer be any doubt 


that China is meant. ων» Sin, and 


Can a woman forget her suckling, 


wi Chin, are the names given to 
China by the Arabs. The Turks also 
have ues wp Chin-oo-Machin. 


Comp. arte ork: And the 


Syrians, joa. It has been affirmed 


that the term is not in use among the 
Chinese themselves, except as the 
designation of a dynasty, which took 
its rise B.c. 246; but, according to 
Professor Neumann, 7571. was the 
name of a great tributary kingdom to 
the west of China, the first monarch 
of which began to reign B.c. 897. 
Nothing was more natural than for 
the western Asiatics, whose caravans 
brought them into contact with this 
kingdom, to extend the designation to 
the whole empire. 

13. A joyful anticipation of the 
happy state of things under the 
Messiah, as set forth in the pre- 
ceding verses. 

14, The prophet now naturally 
reverts to the desolate condition of 
Jerusalem during the captivity. To 
interpret Zion, as meaning the Chris- 
tian church, would do violence to the 
remaining portion of the chapter. 
No language could more pathetically 
and tenderly describe the feelings of 
the Jewish church, or the love of God 
towards her, than that here employed. 


378 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP, XLIX: 


So as to have no affection for the son of her womb ? 


Even these may forget, 
But I will not forget thee. 


16 Behold! I have portrayed thee upon my hands ; 
Thy walls are continually before me. 


17 Thy sons make haste ; 


They that destroyed thee, and laid thee waste, depart from thee. 


18 


Lift up thine eyes around, and look ; 


They all assemble, they come to thee. 


As I live, saith Jehovah, 


Thou shalt surely put them all on as ornaments, 
And bind them about as doth a bride. 


19 
destroyed, 


For thy wastes,and thy desolate places, and thy land that is 


Shall now be too confined for the inhabitants ; 
And they that destroyed thee shall be far away. 
20 Thy sons, of whom thou wast bereaved, 


16. pea properly signifies fo cut or 
grave letters in some solid substance ; 
but here to delineate, portray. UXX. 
ἐζωγράφηκα. There seems to be an 
allusion to the custom of marking or 
representing certain objects on the 
hand, with a view to their being kept 
constantly in remembrance. Maun- 
drell describes such a practice as 
common with the pilgrims who visit 
Jerusalem. There are artists who 
undertake the operation. They em- 
ploy wooden stamps, with which they 
print off upon the arm, with powder 
of charcoal, the desired figure or 
representation. They then take two 
very fine needles tied close together, 
which they dip like a pen in an ink 
compounded of gunpowder and ox- 
gall, and make with them small pune- 
tures all along the lines of the figure 
which they have printed ; and washing 
the part in wine, conclude the opera- 
tion. See Journey from Aleppo to 
Jerusalem, p. 75. And comp., for a 
similar custom, chap. xliy. 5. 

17. 133, thy children, is read 723, thy 
builders, by the LXX., Chald., Vulg., 
Saad., and is approved by Michaelis, 
Lowth, and many of the moderns, on 
the ground of the antithesis which it 
forms to the following participles, 


ΗΝ but the Masoretic 
reading is more agreeable to the 
whole context, especially vers. 18, 21, 
22. It is accordingly adopted by 
Gesenius, Hitzig, Maurer, Scholz, and 
Jenour. Nz) 732, Lowth strangely ren- 
ders, shall become thine offspring. No 
interpretation could be more forced. 

18. The nomin. to 033 is 33, in the 
preceding verse. The inhabitants of 
a city are its beauty ; and, cities being 
regarded by the Hebrews as females, 
the metaphor of a bride is the more 
appropriate. 

19, 20. The second °2 is intensive, 
but cannot well be expressed in 
English. This prophecy was literally 
fulfilled in the immense population of 
Judza, between the return from the 
captivity and the time of our Lord. 
Josephus, describing Galilee, says: 
προσησκήθη γοῦν ὑπὸ τῶν οἰκητόρων 
πᾶσα, καὶ μέρος αὐτῆς οὐδὲν ἀργόν. 
ἀλλὰ καὶ πόλεις πυκναὶ, καὶ τὸ τῶν 
κωμῶν πλῆθος πανταχοῦ πολυάνθρωπον 
διὰ τὴν εὐθηνίαν, ὡς τὴν ἐλαχίστην ὑπὲρ 
πεντακισχιλίους πρὸς τοῖς μυρίοις ἔχειν 
οἰκήτορας. De Bello Jud. lib. iii. cap. 
8. P2BwW 2a, lit. flit orbitatis tua, but 
meaning, the inhabitants of which 
thou wast bereaved. 773 may either 
be rendered approach me; or, recede 


TPN POW ; 


CHAP. XLIX.| 


ISATAH. 379 


Shall again say in thine ears : 
The place is too confined for me ; 
Make room for me that I may dwell. 


21 And thou shalt say in thine heart : 


Who hath born these for me ? 
For I was childless and solitary ; an exile and an outcast : 


Who, then, hath brought up these ? 


Behold! I was left alone: 
These—where were they ? 
27; 


Thus saith the Lord Jehovah: 


Behold, I will raise my hand to the nations, 

And elevate my standard to the people ; 

And they shall bring thy sons in their bosom, 

And thy“daughters shall be borne on their shoulders. 


23 


Kings also shall be thy supporters, 


And their princesses thy nurses ; 

With their faces on the ground they shall do thee homage, 
And shall lick the dust of thy feet ; 

And thou shalt know that I am Jehovah ; 

For they shall not be ashamed that wait for me. 


Jrom me, according to circumstances. 
In such a case as the present, the 
latter is obviously the proper render- 
ing. LXX. ποίησον μοὶ τόπον: Vulg. 
Jue mihi spatium. For similar contrary 
acceptations of words signifying ap- 
proach and departure, see Gesenius zz 
loc. and his Lex. iw voc. 023, and comp. 
Gen. xix. 9. 

21. 7712 being the form exclusively 
employed when the mother is spoken 
of, the verb must be rendered by orn, 
not by deget. Instead of 7x, fifty-six 
of Kennicott and De Rossi’s MSS., 
twenty-five more originally, now five, 
with the LXX., Vulg., and the Targ., 
De Rossi, 737, read 7x), 

22, 23. These verses describe the 
readiness, zeal, and liberality, with 
which, in the providence of God, the 
nations and their rulers should pro- 
mote the restoration of the Jews to 


their own land. By qn, Arab. we 


Eth. εν ὦ ὦ : is meant the dosom of a 
garment, or, that part of it which 


opens about the bosom. The meta- 
phor is taken from the practice, still 
common in the East, of carrying 
young children in such aperture. 
That of carrying on the shoulders is 
also very common. Among the South 
Sea islanders, it is a mark of honour 
for females to be borne astride on 
men’s shoulders. The queen of Ta- 
heite is thus exhibited on the Plate, 
representing the cession of a portion 
of land to the London Missionary 
Society. The prophet represents the 
royal personages as rendering the 
most profound homage to the Jews: 
the acts here specified being those 
usually performed to superiors in the 
East. Ibn Batutu relates, that when 
the daughter of the Sultan of Con- 
stantinople, one of the wives of the 
Sultan of Uzbek Tartary, returned on 
a visit to her parents, and met them, 
she alighted, and kissed the ground 
before them, as well as the hoofs of 
their horses. Travels, p. 82. The 
prediction was fulfilled in the reigns 
of Cyrus, Darius. Hystaspes, Arta- 


980 


ISATAH. 


(CHAP: XL1x. 


24 Shall the booty be taken from the mighty ? 
Or the captive of the strong be rescued ? 


25 Verily thus saith Jehovah : 


The captive of the mighty shall be taken, 
And the booty of the terrible shall be rescued : 
For with him that contendeth with thee will I contend ; 


And I will save thy children. 
26 


Yea, I will feed thine oppressors with their own flesh, 


And they shall be drunk with their own blood, as with new 


wine ; 


And all flesh shall know that I, Jehovah, am thy Saviour, 
And thy Redeemer, the Mighty One of Jacob. 


xerxes, Demetrius Nicator, Alexander 
the Great, the Ptolemies, Esther, &c. 
The address concludes with the assur- 
ance that the sons of Zion should 
experience the Divine faithfulness in 
the fulfilment of the promises which 
God had given them. 

24—26. So completely were the 
Jews in subjection to the tyrannical 
power of Babylon, that there was no 
rational prospect of deliverance. This 
is strongly put in the interrogative 
form, ver. 24; and, according to an 
idiom of the language, a negative reply 
is expected; but the two following 
verses contain a pointed answer in the 
affirmative, directing the attention of 
the Jews to the almighty power of 
God, as that by which their rescue 
should assuredly be effected. pe "Ὁ 
some of the ancient, and many modern 
versions, render, the righteous or lawful 
captive. As ?72, however, corresponds 
to yrv, in the following verse, some 
have supposed that the original 
reading must have been yw "τῶ, she 
captive of the terrible, and translate 
accordingly. Lowth calls the present 
reading a palpable mistake, and other- 
wise expresses himself very confidently 
on the point. It is, however, of great 
antiquity ; LXX. ἀδίκως, giving to the 
term a contrary signification ; Aq. 
and Theod. δίκαιον ; Symm. δικαίου, 
Zwinglius observes, “ Hic autem 
Justus pro Robusto accipitur, quo- 
modo Germanis, Redlich : quee vox et 
justem et fortem significat.” Such is 
actually the rendering of the Syriac, 


a 9 ΩΣ 
fromcss hme, the captive of the 


strong, from eas , prevaluit, confortatus 
est; Ethpa. fortiter egit. And this” 
idea also attaches to the Arab. (340. 


Thus Freytag, “Tum quoque verbo 
significationem tribuerunt fortiler pug- 
nandi,” conf. Hamak. Waked. p. 145, 
vers. (Hoe ex dicendi modo ortum videtur 


οι εὐ Ido .) Hence (3h0, sin- 
i , “ 
ceritas, robur ; ὥς “9 ck, 


strenuus, gut impetu in hostem faciendo 
veraz est. Kam. Alb. Schultens, turba 
captiva bellatoris ; Moller, den Sterke ; 
Tingstadius, en valdig segrare ; Paulus, 
braver Soldat. I have not, therefore, 
scrupled to render “the strong.” In 
his second edition, Gesenius interprets, 
“captives of the righteous,” ἡ. 6. con- 
sisting of such ; but this is unsuitable 
to the connexion. 

26. O'DY, wine. fresh from the grape, 
of which the Orientals are exceedingly 
fond. A description of intestine 
bloodshed. Before the capture of 
Babylon by Cyrus, Evil-merodach had 
been murdered by Neriglissor ; Labo- 
rosoarchodus, the son and successor of 
the latter, was likewise put to death ; 
and, according to Xenophon, it was 
two generals of the king of Babylon, 
Gobrias and Gadarus, who had gone 
over to Cyrus, that forced their way 
into the palace, and slew the king. 
Cyropeed. iv. vii. 


CHAP. L. | 


ISAIAH. 


9581 


CHAPTER L. 


The beginning of this chapter intimately coheres with the preceding. 


The 


captivity was not strictly the act of Jehovah, but the result of the wicked- 
ness of the Jews, 1 ; nevertheless by asserting his Omnipotence, the Servant 
of Jehovah conveys an assurance of deliverance, 2, 3; vindicates to himself 
the possession of those qualifications which fitted him to act as the great 
Prophet of the church, 4, 5 ; adverts to his voluntary sufferings, 6; avows 
his confidence in God for victory over his enemies, 7—9; calls upon the 
pious to exercise faith and trust, 10 ; and denounces vengeance against such 


as trusted in their own devices, 11. 


1 Tuus saith Jehovah: 


Where is the bill of your mother’s divorce, 


With which I dismissed her ? 


Or, to which of my creditors have I sold you ? 

Behold! for your iniquities are ye sold ; 

And for your transgressions is your mother dismissed. 
2 Why, when I came, was there no man? 

When I called, was there none that answered ? 

Is my hand at all too short to redeem ? 

Or, have I no power to deliver ? 


Behold! by my rebuke I dry up the sea, 


And make the rivers a desert ; 


Their fish stinketh for want of water, 


And dieth for thirst. 


1. Two metaphors are here em- 
ployed: the one borrowed from a 
state of matrimony ; the other, from 
mercantile life. The Jewish church 
is frequently represented as standing 
in the relation of wife to Jehovah. To 
prove that her sufferings did not 
proceed from any arbitrary or self-in- 
terested motive in him, he demands 
the production of the bill of divorce,— 
intimating that it would be found to 
contain nothing to impeach his con- 
duct. And, if it were alleged that he 
had disposed of her for the sake of 
advantage, let inquiry be made from 


the person who had purchased her. No 
such allegation could in truth be made. 
The inference is, that if she return to 
obedience she shall be graciously 
received. 

2, 3. The speaker in this and the 
following verses is the Messiah, who 
complains of the inattention and un- 
belief of the Jewish people, and proves 
his ability to save by appealing to the 
mighty operations of his providence. 
The subject implied is the deliverance 
from Babylon, which was to be pre- 
paratory to his coming in the flesh, » 
and suffering, as described in the 


3 B 


382 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. L. 


3 I clothe the heavens with blackness, 
And make sackcloth their covering. 


4 
taught ; 


The Lord Jehovah hath given me the tongue of those who are 


That I may know how to succour the weary with a word ; 
He wakeneth me every morning ; he wakeneth my ear, 
That I may listen like those who are taught. 


And I am not rebellious : 
I turn not back. 
I give my back to the smiters, 


The Lord Jehovah openeth my ear, 


And my cheeks to them that pluck the beard ; 
My face I hide not from reproach and. spitting. 


But the Lord Jehovah helpeth me ; 


Therefore I shall not be confounded ; 
Therefore I set my face as a flint ; 
For I know that 1 shall not be put to shame. 


He is near that justifieth me: 


Who will contend with me? Let us stand up together. 
Who is my adversary ? Let him approach me. 
9 Behold! the Lord Jehovah helpeth me: 


following verses. Δα] yeh to be short 


of hand, is a coramon phrase in Arabic 
to denote powerlessness. On the 
other hand, Artaxerxes Longimanus 
was so called to describe his power. 
4, Comp. xlix. 2; John viii. 28. The 
Messiah was fully qualified to impart 
Divine instruction and consolation. 
This he refers to his Heavenly Father, 
as John vii. 16, xvii. 8. Some take 
ona in two different acceptations in 
this verse ; in the first instance as 
signifying expert; in the latter, dis- 
ciples. It seems preferable to retain 
the same interpretation of the word 
in both cases. Comp. chap. viii. 16, 
liv. 13. mw, the LXX. take in the 
sense of timing a thing, speaking at 
the proper season, τοῦ γνῶναι ἡνίκα 
(Alex. MS. ἐν καιρῷ ἡνίκα) δεῖ εἰπεῖν 
λόγον. It scems rather to signify the 
imparting of mental succour, comfort, and 


the like. Comp. the Arab. oye 
ole , opem tulit, succurrit ; 


ΝΞ 


lel, the day of help ; Aq. ὑποστη- 
ρίσαι ; Vulg. sustentare. Comp. chap. 
lxi. 1—3; Matt. xi. 28. 

5. Comp. Ps. xl. 6; Heb. x. 5. The 
ideas of a Divine commission and 
voluntary obedience are here taught. 
How different the conduct of the 
Messiah from that of Jonah! Comp. 
Jer. xvii. 16. 

6. Plucking the beard was, as it 
still is, regarded in the East as the 
greatest act of indignity, and is here 
selected for the purpose of shewing to 
what contempt and insult the Messiah 
should be exposed. Comp. 2 Sam. x. 
4,5; Isa. vii.20. Spitting in the face 
was likewise considered in the highest 
degree contemptuous. See Deut. xxv. 
9; Numb. xii.14. For the fulfilment, 
see the history of our Lord’s trial. 
Comp. Micah ν. 1. 

7—9. The language of assured 
confidence respecting the issue of his 
sufferings. Comp. Rom. i. 4; 1 Tim. 
iii. 16. 


CHAP. 11.] 


10 


11 


ISAIAH. 


Who is he that condemneth me ? 

Behold! they shall all decay like a garment ; 
The moth shall consume them. 

Who is there among you that feareth Jehovah ; 
That obeyeth the voice of his Servant, 

That walketh in darkness, and hath no light ? 
Let him trust in the name of Jehovah, 

And stay himself upon his God. 

Behold! all ye that kindle a fire, 

That surround yourselves with torches ; 


Walk in the light of your fire, 


383 


And of the torches which ye have kindled : 
This shall ye have at my hand, 


Ye shall lie down in sorrow. 


10. The 7m Ἣν is the same Servant 
who is set forth chap. xlii. 1, 19, xlix. 
5, liii. 11; and the persons described 
are those who should embrace his 
doctrines and submit to his authority. 
Comp. Gen. xlix. 10; Rom. xvi. 26. 
Whatever might be the afflictions and 
persecutions to which they should be 
subject on account of their fidelity to 
his cause, they might confidently 
reckon on Divine protection and sup- 
port. To this they are excited by the 
prophet. 

11. Pursuing the metaphor which 
had just been employed, this verse 
describes the proud and self-righteous 
confidence of the Jews who rejected 
the Messiah, and the punishment in- 
flicted upon them by the Romans. 
They imagined that by means of their 
own devising, they could obtain com- 


fort and happiness ; but they became, 
on the contrary, the subjects of a long 
dark night of vexation and trouble. 
mpr uN, lit. girding on torches, from 
x, Zo gird, gird oneself; but here, more 
generally, ¢o swrround. The term ex- 
presses the number of expedients to 
which the Jews should resort in order 
to obtain relief. nip Gesenius renders 
arrows; but this does not suit the 
connexion,—the object of the persons 
described not being to attack their 
enemies, but to procure /ight for them- 
selves. The noun seems to be derived 
from P23 in the acceptation of binding ; 


hence the Syr. 122) ,acord; such a 
cord prepared and used as ὦ torch ; 


Syr. [DaDroaa , flame; LXX φλόγα. 


CHAPTER LI. 


The Jews in Babylon are further instructed to confide in God for their 
restoration and prosperity, by reflecting on the numerous offspring which 
he had raised up from their solitary progenitor Abraham, 1—3; the great 
end of the restoration consisting in the introduction of the Gospel and its 


984 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. LI. 


blessings, 4, 5; the frailty and perishableness of the Babylonians and their 
empire, 6—8; and the signal display of Divine power exhibited in the 
deliverance of their fathers from Egyptian tyranny, 9,10. Jehovah then 
expressly promises their redemption, 11; challenges their confidence in 
his power and faithfulness, while he assures them of the happy result, 
12—15; asserts the Divine commission of the Messiah to re-establish the 
Jewish polity, 16; and calls upon the nation to rouse from its deplorable 
condition, by an assurance, that, though all human help failed, his inter- 
position was certain, and should prove effectual, 17—23. 


1 HEARKEN to me, ye that pursue righteousness, 


Ye that seek Jehovah ; 


Look to the rock whence ye were hewn, 
And to the hole of the pit whence ye were dug. 


bo 


And to Sarah that bare you: 


Look to Abraham your father, 


Though he was one when I called him, 
Yet I blessed him, and made him many. 

3 For Jehovah will have compassion upon Zion ; 
He will have compassion upon all her wastes: 
Yea, he will make her wilderness like Eden, 
And her desert like the garden of Jehovah : 
Joy and gladness shall be found in her, 
Thanksgiving and the voice of praise. 


4 Attend to me, O my people! 


O my nation! give ear to me ; 


For a law shall proceed from me, 

And my statute will I establish for a light to the people. 
5 My righteousness is near; my salvation goeth forth ; 

Mine arms also shall judge the people: 


1—3. On the vast increase of the 
family of Abraham, according to the 
Divine promise, Gen. xii. 1, 2, is 
founded an argument to induce faith 
in the restoration from Babylon, and 
the increase and prosperity of the 
Jewish state. The metaphors are 
taken from the quarry. For the force 
of 7x, in such application, comp. Ezek. 
XXxill. 24, 

4, 5. These verses are so obviously 
parallel to chap. xlii. 1—4, 6, that 
they must be regarded as referring 


to the same subject—the establish- 
ment of the gospel dispensation. To 
this, in the plan of the Divine govern- 
ment, the restoration of the Jews 
was indispensable. For ‘ay, my people, 
two MSS., one more originally, and 
the Syr., read, "AY, people, in the 
plural ; and for "29, my nation, seven 
MSS., five more originally, and the 
Syr., read ΘΝ, zations. According 
to this alteration, the Gentiles, and 
not the Jews, would be addressed ; 
but the evidence in its favour is not 


CHAP. LI.] 


ISAIAH. 


385 


For me the maritime lands shall wait, 


And shall expect my arm. 


6 Lift up your eyes to the heavens, 
And look upon the earth beneath ; 
Verily, the heavens shall vanish like smoke, 
And the earth decay like a garment, 
And its inhabitants in like manner shall die: 
But my salvation shall be eternal, 
And my righteousness shall not be abolished. 
7 Hearken to me, ye that know righteousness, 
The people in whose heart is my law: 


Fear not the reproach of men, 


Neither be disheartened by their revilings. 

8 For the moth shall consume them like a garment, 
And the worm shall eat them like wool; 
But my righteousness shall be eternal, 
And my salvation to all generations. 

9 Awake, awake, put on strength, O arm of Jehovah ! 
Awake, as in ancient days, in the generations of antiquity. 
Art thou not the same that cut Rahab in pieces ? 


That wounded the dragon ? 
10 


Art thou not the same that dried up the sea, 
The waters of the great abyss, 


That made the depths of the sea 
A way for the passage of the redeemed ? 


to be weighed against that by which 
the reading of the Textus Receptus 
is supported, especially if we take the 
internal evidence into the account. 
v7, to restrain, allay, be quiet; im 
Hiph. to cause to rest, settle, found. 

6. That the natural universe of 
created objects is here intended, the 
context shews. Jehovah contrasts 
with the perishable nature of all such 
objects the durability of gospel bless- 
ings. ΤΙΣ is a ἅπαξ Ney. Comp. the 


Arab. os: valide incessit ; longe abi- 


erunt per terram; and , celeriter 


movit alas im volatu avis. Hence 
δον fugiens ξ ΩΝ Jugitivus. The 


idea of fleeting, transitory, seems to be 


intended. Thus similarly παρελεύσον- 
rar, 2 Pet. ii. 10. y2102 Gesenius 
renders like a gnat, but less naturally. 
Lowth, nearly the same ; only he had 
the delicacy not to name the insect 
he had in view. All the ancient ver- 
sions take Ὶ9 adverbially. 

7,8. The pious in Babylon, who 
were exposed to the reproaches and 
blasphemous scofts of their enemies, 
are encouraged not to be affected by 
their revilings. 

9, 10. In the animated language of 
poetry, Jehovah is represented as ad- 
dressing his own Omnipotence, and 
calling for its renewed exercise, for 
the liberation of his people. For 
722, Rosenm. compares θοῦριν ἐπι- 
ειμένοι ἀλκὴν, Iliad, xviii. 157. 3, 
Rahab, the poetical name of Egypt. 


386 


11 


12 


19 


ISAIAH. [CHAP, LI. 


Thus shall the ransomed of the Lord return, 

And come to Zion with singing ; 

And everlasting joy shall be upon their heads ; 

They shall obtain gladness and joy ; 

And sorrow and sighing shall flee away. 

I, I am he that comforteth you : 

Who then art thou, that thou shouldst fear man, that shall die, 
Or a son of man, that shall be treated as grass ? 


And forget Jehovah thy Maker, 


That stretched out the heavens, 


And founded the earth ; 


And be afraid continually every day, 


Of the fury of the oppressor, 


As if he were ready to destroy ? 
But where is the fury of the oppressor ? 


14 
He shall not die in the pit ; 
Nor be in want of his food. 

15 For I, Jehovah, am thy God, 


See on chap. xxx. 7. For 135, see on 
chap. xxvii. 1—The Infin. 4x? may 
best be rendered substantively. 

11. The ) introduces the apodosis, 
and is best rendered by thus, so, or 


Ω . . (A 
the like. So Kimchi: 73 ~o2H” 


saat mw Ὗ Ὁ» 5, 2.6. the Vau in 75) 
stands for }2, for Vau is used to ex- 
press the similitude or correspondence 
of things. For 303, thirty-nine MSS., 
originally eighteen more, now two, 
two of the earliest editions, and the 
Syr., read 10, from which it has been 
supposed that the text originally 
stood 1px 12", especially as the words 
occur thus, chap. xxxv. 10, which is 
otherwise identical with the present 
text. 

12, 13. In mx, Thou, fem., Zion is 
addressed. The same gender is em- 
ployed in the verbs. That Wx2 is 
properly rendered, as if, comp. Job x. 
19; Zech. x. 6. It must, however, 
be noticed, that the > is omitted in 
thirty-two MSS. ; originally in eight 
more; and in some early editions. 
The pointed question at the close of 


Speedily shall the bending prisoner be released ; 


ver. 13, beautifully introduces the 
prediction, ver. 14. 

14, av, the bending prisoner, pro- 
bably in allusion to the custom of 
putting a prisoner into the πεντεσύ- 
ptyyos, or five-holed wooden machine, 
which held the body in a_bent 
posture, the head as well as the hands 
and feet being fixed in it. A more 
distressing posture cannot well be 
imagined. See Michaelis’ Comment. 
on the Laws of Moses, vol. iii. p. 443. 
Comp. Jer. ii. 20; and the Arab. 


law, 50» inclinatus, curvatus futt, 
reclinavit caput ; 52» “52. inclinatio. 


Lowth, misled by a different use of 
the term, chap. Ixii. 1, renders, He 
marcheth on, &c., contrary to the 
exigency of the following 727), in 
Niphal. 172 is often used adverbially 
to express the idea of haste or speed. 
nm}, here, as 43, Jer. xxviii. 6, Zech. 
ix. 11, means a cistern without water, 
converted into a dungeon. 

15, 16. The gender is now changed 
for the masculine. The person ad- 


CHAP. 11.] 


ISATAH. 


387 


That calmeth the sea, when the waves thereof roar : 


Jehovah of Hosts is his name. 
And I have put my words into thy mouth ; 


16 


Yea, with the shadow of my hand have I covered thee ; 
To plant the heavens, and to found the earth ; 
And to say to Zion, Thou art my people. 


17 


Rouse thyself, rouse thyself; arise, O J erusalem ! 


Thag hast drunk from the hand of Jehovah the cup of his fury ; 
That hast drunk, yea, drunk off the goblet, 


The cup of intoxication. 
18 


She has none to lead her of all the sons she bare ; 


‘Nor any of all the sons she nurtured to take her by the hand. 
19 These two things have happened to thee ; 


dressed is the Messiah, to whom 
alone the predicates employed can, 
with any propriety, be applied. Comp. 
chap. xlii. 1, xlix. 1, 2; with which 
last verse, the former half of the 
second of the present verses is paral- 
lel. The 9 in -¥%02), 16°9, and 7x2, con- 
nects with the person addressed, and 
expresses the end or purpose for 
which he was instructed or employed. 
The creation ascribed to him is that 
of the new Jewish world, the new 
state of things to be established after 
the captivity. Comp. 2 Cor. v. 17, 
where a complete spiritual renovation 
is called a καινὴ κτίσις. The Hebrews 
were accustomed to speak of a great 
political or ecclesiastical revolution 
as the destruction or creation of the 
heavens and the earth, chap. xiii. 13, 
Ixv. 17, 18, Ixvi. 22. y2) is not, as 
Lowth imagines, a mistake for nO, 
but the proper term by which to 
denote the fixing or establishment of 
the heavens, conceived of as a ¢ent,— 
a metaphor not unusual with the 
' sacred writers. It signifies fo plant, 
in the sense of fixing or driving into 
the ground, the pins or pegs to which 
the cords of a tent are fastened. The 
‘Logos, as the Angel that was with 
the O. T. church, (comp. -chap. Ixiii. 
9; Acts vii. 38,) was to bring back 
the Jews and establish them, as before, 
in their own land. 

17. The interposition of the Divine 
Redeemer was indispensable, for Jeru- 
salem was reduced to a state of utter 


helplessness. This is forcibly ex- 
pressed in metaphors taken from the 
use and effects of intoxicating liquors. 
The wrath or anger of Jehovah is 
represented as constituting the ingre- 
dients of a large cup which he had 
put into the hand of the devoted city, 
by drinking the entire contents of 
which she had stupified herself, stag- 
gered and fallen to the ground. In 
this prostrate condition she lay, in- 
capable of helping herself, and with- 
out any one of her citizens to assist 
her. They might struggle and toss, 
but it would only be like the vain 
efforts of the oryx to extricate him- 
self from the net in which he is 
entangled. At length Jehovah inter- 
poses, and transfers the cup to her 
oppressors, who, in their turn, ar 
reduced to the same condition, while 
she, on the contrary, is completely 
restored. Comp. Jer. xxv. 15—31, 
xlix, 12, li. 7; Lam. iv. 215; Ezek. 
Xx. SI—35; Rev. xiv. 10. The 
passage is justly considered by Lowth, 
as exhibiting sublime poetry of the 
highest order. ‘yn7 ivnT is much 
more emphatic than the simple "YY 
“pr, ver. 9, though even there the 
repetition gives ‘intensity to the 
style. 729, Syr. ἔ , Arab. Sar sucit, 


exsuxit, raeans to drink greedily, drink 
off, to the dregs. 

19. What the two things here re- 
ferred to are has been disputed. 
The more natural solution of the 


388 


Who shall bemoan thee ?— 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. LI. 


Desolation and destruction; famine also, and sword : 
Who ? I myself will comfort thee. 


20 
Like the oryx in a net; 


Thy sons swoon; they lie at the head of all the streets, 


They are full of the fury of Jehovah, 


The rebuke of thy God. 
21 


Wherefore, hear now this, thou afflicted, 


And drunken, but not with wine. 


22 


Thus saith thy Lord, Jehovah, 


And thy God, the Defender of his people: 
Behold! I will take out of thy hand the cup of intoxication, 
The goblet, the cup of my fury : 


Thou shalt drink it no more. 
23 


But I will put it into the hand of thine oppressors, 


That have said to thee, Bow down, that we may pass over ; 
And thou madest thy back like the ground, 
And as the street to the passengers. 


difficulty is to regard the four nouns 
which follow as divisible into pairs : 
Ww and 712 describing the destruction 
of the city ; 12) and 297, that of its 
inhabitants. The prefixed to each 
of the nouns is not without emphasis. 
After Ὁ, who, we should have ex- 
pected Jou, shall comfort thee? Wut 
Jehovah suppresses the rest of the 
question, and at once replies, 7272, 
1 will comfort thee. The ancient ver- 
sions, with the exception of the Targ., 
express the third person. 

20. sin, the LXX. strangely render, 
σευτλίον ἡμίεφθον, a half-cooked beet ; 
but Aquil., Symm., and Theod., ὄρυξ, 
the oryx, which is also the rendering 
of the Vulg. The LXX., however, 
give ὄρυξ as the meaning of inn, 
Deut. xiv. 5, of which the form in 
the present instance is doubtless a 
contraction. The oryx is an animal 
of the antelope species, which, in the 
East, is still caught in a net. 

21, See chap. xxix. 9. Owing to 


the close connexion between n12% and 
ὯΝ, the former word is put in the 
construct. form, though both 8%) and 
intervene. 

22. 29, from 2, ¢o contend, plead 
Jor, defend, is here a noun signifying 
a defender ; one who maintains, or vin- 
dicates the cause of another. Comp. 
av, Hos. v. 13, x. 6; and the parti- 
cipial form, Isa. xix. 20. 

23. JwH2, to thy soul, i.e. according 
to a common Hebraism, ¢o thee. The 
metaphor here employed is taken 
from the haughty and degrading 
manner in which Oriental kings treat 
their captives. Ibn Batuta relates, 
that when the negroes who appeared 
before the black sultan at Mali, in 
Nigritia, fell down, they laid bare 
their backs, and covered their heads 
with dust, as tokens of the most 
profound submission : by the former, 
indicating that he might walk over 
their naked backs. See also Lowth’s 
Note. 


CHAP. LII.] ISATAH. 389 


CHAPTER 1171]. 1—12. 


The first twelve verses of this chapter continue the subject with which the 
preceding closes—the restoration from Babylon. Jerusalem is called upon 
to change her position, 1, 2; reasons are given by Jehovah for his gracious 
interference in behalf of the captives, 3—6 ; the joyful announcement of 
the event, and the universal joy it would occasion to the liberated, are next 
introduced, 7, 8; Jerusalem, as the metropolis of Judza, is summoned to 
participate in the joy, while the surrounding nations behold the wonderful 
display of Divine power and goodness, 9, 10. The address concludes with 
a direct call to the captives to leave Babylon, taking no idolatrous thing 


with them, and calmly confiding in their Almighty Deliverer, 11, 12. 


The 


remaining three verses form the commencement of the celebrated prophecy 
of the Messiah, which is continued throughout the following chapter. 


1 AWAKE, awake, put on thy splendour, O Zion! 
Put on thy beautiful array, O Jerusalem! the holy city ; 
For the un¢ircumcised and profane shall enter thee no more. 

2 Shake thyself from the dust; arise, take thy seat, O Jerusalem ! 
Loose thyself from the bands of thy neck, 


O captive daughter of Zion! 
3 For thus saith Jehovah: 


As ye sold yourselves for nought, 
So ye shall be redeemed without money. 


1, 2. signifies both strength and 
glory. Here the latter acceptation is 
required by the parallel Myon, deau- 
teous array. SD) TY, the uncircumcised 
and the impure, are to be restricted to 
the Babylonians, who had entered the 
holy city, carried off its inhabitants, 
and made it desolate. They had 
proved the most formidable enemy 
the Jews ever had ; but nothing fur- 
ther was to be apprehended from them. 
Comp. Nah. i. 15, where similar lan- 
guage is employed respecting the As- 
syrian power. To explain the passage 
of other foreigners, would lay it open 
to contradiction from facts of history : 
Antiochus Epiphanes in particular 
having exerted a more polluting and 


irreligious influence in Jerusalem, than 
even the Chaldeans; while the Ro- 
mans also took and destroyed it. Its 
application to the Christian Church is 
equally unsatisfactory. νὰ, sif, de- 
notes, in such connexion, to occupy 
an elevated seat or throne; and is 
opposed to the prostrate condition 
described at the end of the preceding 
chapter. The Keri 7m5n7 is found in 
the text of a number of MSS., and in 
the Soncin., Brix., and Complut. 
Editions. 

3. As the 1 in 8% is the Vau adaqua- 
tionis, it is implied before 037, which 
introduces the protasis. Comp. chap. 
li. 11. For the sentiment, see chap. 
xlv. 13. 


ag 


ὅ90 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. LII. 


4 For thus saith the Lord Jehovah: 
My people went down at first into Egypt, to dwell there, 
And Assyria oppressed them at the last. 
5 And now, what have I here, saith Jehovah, 
That my people should be taken away for nought? 
They that rule over them, howl, saith Jehovah ; 
And continually, every day, my name is blasphemed. 
6 Assuredly, my people shall know my name ; 
Assuredly, they shall know in that day, 
That I am the Promiser: Behold me! 
7 How beautiful upon the mountains the feet of him that publish- 


eth good news! 


That announceth peace, that publisheth good, 
That announceth salvation, saying to Zion: 


Thy God reigneth ! 


8 Thy watchmen shall raise their voice ; 
With their voice shall they sing together ; 


For eye to eye shall they see, 


4, 5. Two instances of oppression, 
from which Jehovah had delivered his 
people, are here specified, to assure 
them that he would again deliver them. 
The latter was that of Sennacherib. 
Though 2x3 is nowhere else used in 
a temporal sense, yet the exigency of 
the parallelism requires it to be so 
taken in this place. 75 refers to 
heaven, the place of God’s immediate 
presence. The interrogation strongly 
implies, that God would not, in the 
afflicted circumstances of the Jews, 
remain inactive, but would descend 
and interpose for their deliverance. 
Their gratuitous oppression in Baby- 
lon, and the contempt poured upon 
his holy character by the Babylonians, 
are adduced as motives for such inter- 
position. There is generally supposed 
to be a reference to this passage in 
Rom. ii. 24; but it rather seems to be 
to Ezek. xxxvi. 22, 23. 

6. After the second 135, supply >? 
from the preceding. To know the 
name of God is to be practically and 
experimentally acquainted with the 
Divine character :—here, especially, 
the Divine faithfulness. 

7—9. Messengers are sent before- 


hand to Judea, to announce the 
deliverance. They are seen hastening 
over the mountains,—an object most 
grateful to the spectators. The joyful 
proclamation is made, that the God of 
Zion reigns. The watchmen on the 
ruinous walls of Jerusalem, as with 
one voice, repeat the news. The eye 
of each inhabitant catches that of his 
fellow: all is ecstasy at the joyful 
event. The language employed is, in 
part, employed elsewhere, as chap. xl. 
9, xliv. 23, xlix. 13, but nowhere is 
the whole combined ashere. Nahum 
uses the identical phraseology re- 
specting the messengers who an- 
nounced the destruction of Nineveh, 
chap. ii. 1 (Eng. Trans. i. 15); and the 
Apostle Paul quotes it in illustration 
of his statements relative to the first 
preachers of the Gospel, Rom. x. 15. 
The point of beauty in the feet of the 
messengers is not their being torn and 
dusty, as Campbell expounds, which, 
though presenting a spectacle natu- 
rally offensive, yet are, in consideration 
of the welcome message, converted 
into one that is pleasing and delight- 
ful; but the speed with which they 
bear the messengers forward. In 4p 


CHAP. LI. | 


When Jehovah restoreth Zion. 


ISAIAH. 


591 


9 Burst out, sing together, ye waste places of Jerusalem ! 
For Jehovah hath comforted his people ; 


He hath redeemed Jerusalem. 
Jehovah hath made bare his holy arm 


10 
Before all the nations ; 


And all the ends of the earth shall see 


The salvation of our God. 
11 
Touch not the unclean ; 


Go out from the midst of her; 


Depart ye, depart ye, go out thence ; 


Be pure, ye that bear the vessels of Jehoyah ! 


12 


For ye shall not go out with haste, 


Neither shall ye proceed in flight ; 


For Jehovah goeth before you, 
The God of Israel shall also bring up your rear. 


is an ellipsis of 3, which is. very 
common. For the true meaning of 
mm 2103, in opposition to Lowth’s 
construction, see Ps. xiv. 7. pya py, 
eye in eye, or eye to eye, is generally 
explained as signifying clearness of 
vision, or unanimity of opinion. 
There does not appear to be any 
thing in the connexion to warrant 
such exegesis. The phrase occurs 
besides only in Numb. xiv. 14, where 
it is used for the purpose of expressing 
the indubitable certainty of the Divine 
manifestations to Israel. Here the 
subject is not the discovery or revela- 
tion of the mind of God, but the joy 
felt on hearing of the downfal of 
Babylon. Nothing is more natural 
than for one person whose feelings 
are elated with joy, to look to the 
glistening eyes of another who is 
equally interested in the cause by 
which it is produced. The phrases, 
mm 23 72, Numb: xii. 8, and Ὁ} ox 028, 
Exod, xxxiii, 11, are not exactly 
parallel. The change of dD into 
ΟΣ is obviously by emendation. 

10. This verse is anticipative of 
chap. hii. 1. The restoration from 
Babylon was to be introductory to a 
greater deliverance, in which all the 
inhabitants of the world should be 
personally interested. 

11. The Jews in general, and the 


» 


priests in particular, are summoned 
to leave the place of their captivity ; 
and, by purification and separation 
from every idolatrous and sinful ob- 
ject, to prepare for their return to 
the holy land. In dw and azine, Baby- 
Jon 18 understood by implication. 
Comp. chap. xlviii. 20. So far as 
external obedience was concerned, 
there is every reason to conclude that 
this order was punctually obeyed. To 
bear the sacred vessels would naturally 
devolve upon the priests, though 
committed by Cyrus to the care of 
Sheshbazzar, the prince of Judah, 
Ezra i. 7—11, v. 13—15, vi. 5. Comp. 
for the sentiment, Rev. xviii. 4. Part 
of the words are appropriated by Paul, 
2 Cor. vi. 17, for the purpose of 
warning Christians against having any 
fellowship with idolaters. 

12. The exodus from Babylon was 
to be very different from that out of 
Egypt. 187, hasty flight, is the very 
term employed, Exod. xii, 11, Deut. 
xvi. 3, to express the hasty manner in 
which the Hebrews ate the passover 
on the eve of their departure from 
the latter country. The metaphor of 
the van and rear-guard is likewise 
borrowed from the same _ history, 
Exod. χῖν. 19. Under the immediate 
protection of Jehovah, their covenant 
God, the Jews had nothing to fear. 


392 ISAIAH. [CHAP. LII. 


CHAPTER LIT. 13—LIII. 


That a new section of the book, including these fifteen verses, begins here, is 
universally admitted. The prominence given to the SERVANT OF JEHOVAH; 
the depth of his humiliation ; his unpretending and unpromising appear- 
ance; the vicarious nature of his sufferings and death; his subsequent 
exaltation, success, conquests, and glory,—present a fout-ensemble of cha- 
racter unequalled by any exhibited elsewhere in Scripture. The prophet 
collects into one focus the various rays of light which he and preceding 
seers had scattered abroad for the purpose of revealing to the Jewish 
people the Illustrious Deliverer that was to come. Hence the unparalleled 
perspicuity of the prophecy, and the facility with which all its parts apply 
to the Messiah ; while every attempt to excogitate hypotheses in support 
ofyother subjects has only obscured and perplexed it. 

That the Jews would violently oppose the application of the passage to Jesus 
of Nazareth was naturally to be expected. When adduced, in argument 
with them, by Origen, they explained it of the sufferings of their own 
nation ; and this hypothesis is adopted by Jarchi, Abenezra, Kimchi, Abar- 
banel, and Lipmann ; only some of these writers are of opinion that the 
pious part of the nation is intended. Some few have endeavoured to 
interpret it of the pious king Josiah; and others, among whom Saadias 
Haggaon, of the prophet Jeremiah. Jonathan, however, in his Targum, the 
Midrash Tanhuma, the Pesikta, Moses Haddarshan, the Talmud, the Mid- 
rash Tillim, and the books Rabboth, Chasidim, and Zohar, more or less 
unreservedly apply it to the Messiah ; and Rabbi Alshech, in his Commen- 
tary on the prophecy, avows it as his opinion that such application of it is 
obviously the right one. To which may be added, that of those Jews who 
have truly embraced the Christian faith, most have been impelled to take 
the step by the evidence which the prophecy Puppy of the identity of 
the suffering and glorified Messiah. 

Grotius was the first professedly Christian author sit interpreted the section 
of any other than our Saviour. His hypothesis, however, that Jeremiah 
was intended, has not been adopted by any, except Seidel, and Collins, in 
his Scheme of Literal Prophecy. Schuster, Eichhorn, Telge, Stephani, 
Rosenmiiller in his later Commentaries, Hitzig, and others, interpret the 
section of the Jewish people collectively ; while Paulus, Ammon, Maurer, 
and Thenius, suppose the pious portion of that people to be meant. 
According to the earlier opinion of Rosenmiiller, which he abandoned, but 
which has been adopted by De Wette and Gesenius, the prophetic order, or 
the collective body of the prophets, forms the subject of the prediction. 
Other hypotheses of minor note may be seen in Hengstenberg, as quoted, 
chap. xlii. 1. 

The exclusive application of the passage to Christ was more or less ably 


CHAP. LII. | ISATAH. 393 


justified by several of the Fathers in their controversies both with Jews 
and Pagans. In modern times its defence has been sustained by J. H. and 
J. Ὁ. Michaelis, Moldenhauer, Lowth, Koppe, Kocher, Dathe, Déderlein, 
Cube, Henzler, Hezel, Hess, Storr, Hansi, Martini, v.d. Palm, Scholz, and 
others; and more especially by Hengstenberg, wf swp.,and Reinke in his 
admirable Exegesis Critica in Jesaiz, cap. lii. 13—liii. 12, seu de Messia Ex- 
piatore Passuro et Morituro Commentatio, &c. Minster, 1836, 8vo. To these 
two writers I refer the reader, since they may be regarded as having ex- 
hausted the subject, and supplied the best critical expositions of the pro- 
phecy. Those who may not have access to their works will find a brief but 
very satisfactory reply to the arguments of Gesenius, in Dr. J. Pye Smith’s 
Four Discourses on the Sacrifice and Priesthood of Christ, London, 1828, 
note ix. p. 260. That it was our Redeemer alone that'the prophet had in 
his eye, must be admitted by all who fully allow the Divine authority of 
the N. T., and have impartially examined the following passages, in which 
certain parts of the prediction are either referred to, or expressly quoted 
with such application : Matt. viii. 17; Mark xv. 28 ; Luke xxii. 37 ; John i. 
29, xii. 38, 41; Acts viii. 30—35 ; Rom. x. 16; 1 Pet. ii. 21—25. 

In chap. lii. 13—15, Jehovah introduces the Messiah, and announces his exalta- 
tion and preceding sufferings ; liii. 1—10 contains the language of the pro- 
phet, complaining of the infidelity of the Jews, 1; describing the scandal 
and contempt with which they regarded his humble and suffering condition, 
2,3; asserting the cause of his sufferings to be the sins of others, 4—6; 
setting forth several remarkable circumstances connected with them, 7—9 ; 
and predicting the glorious effects in which they should result, 10. At the 
middle of ver. 11, a renewed declaration commences, which is confirmatory 
of what had been previously advanced respecting the work of the Messiah, 
the propitiatory nature of his sufferings, and the certainty of his remunera- 
tive triumphs, 11, 12. 


13 BreHo“p! my Servant shall prosper ; 
He shall be raised, and extolled, and highly exalted. 


13. This and the two following 
verses form the text on which chap. 
liii. may be said to be a commentary. 
From the deliverance to be effected 
by Cyrus, the prophet makes a sudden, 
but natural transition to that infi- 
nitely more glorious salvation which 
the Messiah should effect ; and shews 
that the latter was to be achieved, not 
by conquest, but by suffering. 737 is 
here used δεικτικώς, for the purpose of 
drawing special attention to Him and 
his work. For 7%" 72¥, comp. xli. 1, 
19, xlix. 3, 5, 1. 8 As Cyrus had 


succeeded and attained toa high pitch 
of worldly elevation and renown, so 
the greater future Deliverer should 
prosper in his spiritual undertaking, 
and be crowned with glory and honour. 
y27, most of the ancient versions 
have taken in the acceptation of being 
prudent, intelligent, &c.; but the ren- 
dering of the Targ. sto IP Mz? NF, 
“Behold! my Servant the Messiah 
shall prosper,” better suits the con- 
nexion. That the verb has this signi- 
fication, see Deut. xxix. 9 ; Josh. 1. 7, 
8; Prov, xvii. 8; and, as here, in 


ὦ ee 


394 


14 


ia ISALAH. 


[CHAP. 1111. 


a. 
s many were shocked at thee, 


(Such was the disfiguration of his appearance more than that of 


any man, 


And of his form more than that of the sons of men :) 


εἴ. Βο shall he sprinkle many nations: 


Kings shall shut their mouths on account of him ; 
For what had not been told them, they shall see ; 
And what they had not heard, they shall perceive. 


reference to the Messiah, Jer. xxiii. 
δ. 7722) 87) DTV are Ssynonymes em- 
ployed to express the superlative ex- 
altation and glory of the Redeemer. 
Comp. Eph. i. 20—23 ; Phil. ii.9—11; 
Heb. ii. 7—9. The Midrash Tanhuma, 
taking each of the verbs separately, ex- 
plains the passage thus : moan 7 ΠῚ 
ΒΝ YO TIN MoD NON OAK yO ON— 
mot, This is the King Messiah,—who 
shall be higher than Abraham, more ele- 
vated than Moses, and exalted above the 
ministering angels. 

14, 15. To the words Ἰοὺ Wwx2, Ke. 
forming the protasis, correspond ΠΡ 73, 
&c. which introduce the apodosis. The 
72, in ver. 14, is merely expletive of 
what precedes it, and introduces an 
exegetical parenthesis. The change 
of 2, at thee, into YY, at him, which 
is the reading of two MSS., the Targ., 
and Syr., is doubtless an emendation. 
Similar instances of enallage of person 
are not uncommon in Hebrew poetry. 
The 14th verse commences with a 
direct address, which form gives way 
to the use of the third person, more 
appropriately used in description, and 
is not resumed, OW is used intran- 
sitively to express the shock felt by 
the mind on the discovery of any un- 
expected object or event. Here, as in 
Jer. ii. 12, xviii. 16, xix. 8, it conveys 
the idea of disappointment and aver- 
sion. With such feelings the bulk of 
the Jewish people (02) regarded our 
Saviour ; and consequently derived no 
benefit from his atonement. When, 
on the other hand, he was preached 
unto the Gentiles (ἔθνεσιν, 03), they 
believed, and participated in its bless- 
ings. nm is the construct. of Nw, 
corruption, deformity, disfigurement, from 
nm, ¢o corrupt, spoil, deface. It is in 


construction with 27872, though sepa- 
rated from it by xp, just as V23 is 
from 0", in DX sax 23, Job xv. 10. 
See also Isa. xix. 8. The preposition 
ΤῸ is here, as in the clause just quoted 
from Job, to be taken in its compara- 
tive, and not, with Hengstenberg, Hit- 
zig, and Reinke, in its negative or 
privative acceptation. Filling up the 
ellipses, the passage will read thus: 
ASAD TNA NTO Ws AVON WANT NT 72 
Dis 33, Such was the disfigurement of his 
countenance, more than that of the counte- 
nance of any man, and the disfigurement of 
his form more than that of the form of the 
sons of men. In the second line of a pa- 
rallelism, the term which expresses the 
thing compared is frequently omitted. 
Some of the moderns, after Jerome, 
limit the description here given to the 
humble and abject condition of the 
Messiah ; but, that the effects of the 
bodily injuries inflicted upon him, as 
well as of the intense mental anguish 
to which he was subject, are likewise 
to be taken into the account, the 
minute detail of his sufferings in 


the following chapter abundantly 
proves. oa) ΝᾺ ΠΡ 72. The verb 73, 


which occurs here in the Hiph. Con- 
jugation, signifies, in every other 
instance, ¢o sprinkle, besprinkle. 'The 
idea of leaping for joy, exulting, &e., to 
which Gesenius assigns the primary 
place in his Lexicon, is unsustained 
by a single example from Hebrew 
usage, or from any of the kindred 


dialects. The Arab. Ι» which has 


been compared, has no such signi- 
fication,—the rendering, erul/avit pre 
hilaritate, which Golius gives from 
the Kamdos, being founded on an 
erroneous reading. See Freytag. In 


CHAP. 1.11.]} 


ISAIAH. 


395 


CHAPTER 1111. 


1 Who hath believed our report ? 
And to whom hath the arm of Jehovah been revealed ? 


Ethiopic the corresponding verb is 
VHS <7, respersit, conspersit ; hence 


‘@MTH'S: LUV: the sprinkling of blood, 
Heb. xi. 28; ΣΉ ΠΤ : EYL : the 
same, xii.24;and ΠΡ HET: GOU: 


AH.Preri : ACI : through 


the sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ, 
i 'Pet, “1 2. ‘Comp.’ Heby *ix.” 19! 


MVRIHS: σὺ χά. : ACT: 


(Ὁ Π“ Δο: (VHD : ad sprinkled the 


book of the law, and all the people. The 
Vulg. and Syr. accordingly render, 


“- v wi 
asperget gentes multas: [πωλῶν jo Foe) 


v 
(lone purifying ov expiating many 


nations. With such support we may 
dismiss the derivations of Schroeder, 
Gesenius, Martini, Michaelis, and 
others, and acquiesce in the decision 
of First, in his Heb. Concord. “ At 
vero nil impedit, quominus etiam hoc 
loco ingenitam verbi significationem 
retineamus.” This signification he 
shews to be rigure, irrigare, inspergere, 
adspergere, imbuere. On consulting the 
passages in the Levitical code in which 
the verb occurs, instances will be 
found of an ellipsis both of the mate- 
rial sprinkled, and the preposition %, 
upon, just as in the present case. See 
Lee’s Sermons and Dissert. pp. 199— 
202. The ceremonial use of the term, 
and the N. T. allusions to it, quoted 
above, shew the meaning to be, that 
the Messiah would extend to the 
nations the purifying efficacy of his 
blood. The offence taken at him by 
the Jews, and the experience of his 
salvation by the numerous Gentile 
nations (0°21 0%3), form a striking anti- 
thesis. For 72 y2p, fo shut the mouth, 


comp. Job xxix. 9. It means, to 
maintain a respectful silence, and so 
to acknowledge the superiority of the 
person to whom it is shewn. 7x} here 
signifies to perceive mentally. The 
preaching of the Gospel, as the means 
of extending throughout the world 
the blessings of redemption, is clearly 
implied in the prophetic description ; 
while the history of the Church abun- 
dantly exhibits the fulfilment of the 
prediction. 


Cuapter LIII.—1. The prophet re- 
sumes the subject of the offence taken 
by the Jews at the meanness of our 
Lord’s outward appearance ; and to 
intimate, that few, if any of them, 
would receive the testimony borne by 
himself and other divinely-inspired 
messengers on the subject, he asks, 
Who hath believed, &.? πυνοῦ or 
mow is properly the Pah. Part. and 
signifies what has been heard by any 
one. Chrysostom so understands it 
here: οὐκ εἶπε, τῇ διδασκαλίᾳ ἡμῶν 
ἐνταῦθα δεικνὸς, ὅτι οὐκ οἴκοθέν τι ἐφθέγ- 
γοντο ἀλλ᾽ ἅπερ ἤκουσαν παρὰ τοῦ Θεοῦ 
ταῦτα ἀπήγγελαν. Thus also Martini, 
Jahn, Rosenmiiller, and others. That 
it was not, however, intended to con- 
vey the idea of the Divine origin of 
the message, appears from the zwsus 
loquendi, according to which it is em- 
ployed actively, to denote a report or 
testimony communicated to and heard 


by others. Comp.the Ethiopic f}"UUg, 


audivit, testificatus est; FY (7, cesti- 


mony. UXX. ἀκοὴ, Rom. x. 16. Targ. 
NIANDI, our announcement. YIN, arm, 
like δ, hand, denotes power as put 
forth in act. The meaning is, that 
few would recognise in the Messiah 
the efficacious interposition of Jeho- 
vah for the deliverance of Israel. To 
such, however, as believed, he was 
Θεοῦ δύναμιν καὶ Θεοῦ σοφίαν, 1 Cor. i. 


396 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP LITT. 


2 For he grew up like a sucker before them, 
And like a root out of dry ground: 
He had neither form nor splendour, that we should regard him ; 
Nor appearance, that we should desire him. 
3 He was despised and contemned by men, 
A man of sorrows, and familiar with grief, 


24. No importance is to be attached 
to the use of ὅν, instead of ?and 5x, 
which, in all other instances, follow 
723, since these prepositions are other- 
wise often interchangeable. Comp. 


the Arab. le | Je, in Harir. 


2. The Ὁ in YY is causal, and, at the 
same time, connects the verb with 
yy, chap. 11]. 15: the subject being 
the Servant of Jehovah there spoken 
of. my is frequently used of the 
growth of plants. 72%, properly a suck- 
ling ; here a sucker or shoot sprouting 
up from the root of a tree that has 
been cut down to the ground. Hence 
ww, roof, the corresponding syno- 
nyme ; meaning that which springs from 
the root. Comp.a similar metaphorical 
use of this word, and of 7 and ¥3, 
chap. xi. 1, and the note on that verse. 
The suffix in Y28? cannot, with any 
propriety, be referred to Jehovah ; 
since it was not in his estimation, but 
in that of the Jewish people, that the 
Messiah was as a root out of a dry 
ground. It is true, DY, people, does not 
precede; but it is obviously under- 
stood in the interrogative Ὁ, in the 
foregoing verse. 0Y2 Ὁ, Who among the 
people; i.e. the Jews. A more insig- 
nificant and unpromising object can- 
not well be imagined, than a solitary 
sprout in an arid soil, and under a 
sultry oriental sky. The figure strik- 
ingly sets forth the reduced and ob- 
scure condition of the family of David 
at the time of our Lord’s appearance. 
Of the application of part of the lan- 
guage to the Virgin Mary, by Euse- 
bius, Theodoret, Jerome, and other 
Fathers, we may say with Calvin : 
“extra rem loquuntur.” 87 and Ny 
are repeated from chap. lii. 14, only 
with the superadded idea of beautiful 
or graceful; which, indeed, 177, orna- 
ment, splendour, expresses. There is 
clearly a reference to the splendour 


and pomp of the regal state, by which 
monarchs are distinguished from those 


around them. Nosuch majestymarked ἡ 


the Messiah. The Athnach should 
have been placed at ™z, and not at 
ὙΠΟ, as the parallelism shews. Symm. 
has rightly rendered the Ὁ before the 
verbs by iva. The prophet uses the plu- 
ral per xoiveow,—identifying himself 
with his nation, though he condemned 
their conduct. 

3. What had just been described 
negatively is now asserted positively. 
Dw is a rare plural, instead of ΣΝ ; 
occurring only besides in Ps. exli. 4 ; 
Proy. vill. 4. Dx 517 has been vari- 
ously rendered. LXX. ἐκλεῖπον παρὰ 
τοὺς υἱοὺς τῶν ἀνθρώπων. Symm. ἐλά- 
χιστος ἀνδρῶν. Vulg. novissimus viro- 


207 ὁ Ν 
rum. Syr. [.Δ1]» [3ιῶϑο, humillimus 
= 


hominum. Abenezra similarly, 7 
Dyn ov rw, he ceased to be reckoned 
with men. Most of the moderns ap- 
prove of the sense brought out by 


comparing the Arab. UA, spe et aua- 
{0 destituit ; sda, destitutus ope, 


derelictus, contemptus; which seems 
sufficiently justified by ‘27277, my 
intimate friends have abandoned me, Job 
xix. 14. See Schultens zz Joc. As, 
however, those who are thus deserted 
are usually despised or contemned, 
hence the idea of contempt or abhor- 
rence is here conveyed. 2) and 777 
are thus synonymes. As to form, 71) 
is a verbal adj. from the intrans. verb, 
517, to leave off, cease, desert, &&. Ws is 
elegantly borrowed from the preceding 
ows; or, if we suppose it to have 
been previously in the prophet’s 
mind, it may have occasioned the use 
of this plural. makin wy, a man of 
sorrows, according to a Hebrew idiom, 
“a man of many sorrows ;” one who is. 


CHAP. 1111.] 


ISATAH. 


397 


So that men hid their face from him ; 
He was despised, and we regarded him not.. 


4 But it was our griefs he bare, 


the subject of great or manifold suffer- 
ings. Comp. ningn wy, a man of re- 
proofs; i.e. one frequently reproved, 
Prov. xxix. 1, 282 signifies to be pained 
or wounded, either in body or mind, but 
more usually the latter. Comp. the Syr. 


ols, doluit ; Arab. wt and we, 


malo statu mestoque animo fuit, 77 νυν, 
Symm. renders γνωστὸς νόσῳ, known 
by sickness, and is followed by Jahn, 
Martini, Rosenmiller, Gesenius, and 
Maurer. According to this interpre- 
tation, the meaning would be, that 
the Messiah was distinguished from 
all other men by the intensity of his 
sufferings. The parallelism, however, 
requires that the Messiah himself 
should be the subject of the know- 
ledge or experience here spoken οἵ: 
knowing, experienced in, familiar with 
suffering. ‘That the Pahul Part. is to 
be taken in this sense, comp. Deut. i. 
13, 15; where Dy? is manifestly 
synonymous with 0337 D937, and is to 
be rendered, knowing, skilful, or the 
like. The LXX., Syr., and Vulg., ap- 
pear to have read yt), which is found 
in eight MSS., originally in one more, 
and now in four others by correction. 
The reading of De Rossi’s MS. 319, 
ym, is not entitled to notice. τ, the 
Pause punctuation for ἍΤ, weakness, af- 
fliction, pain, sickness, is used both of 
corporeal and of mental disease ; and 
of what is inflicted by another, as 
well as of what arises from natural 
causes in the subject. In the present 
connexion, all ideas of natural malady 
or infirmity would be most irrelevant. 
Comp. vers. 5, 6, 7, 8, 10. Commen- 
tators are generally agreed that the 
prophet uses the word figuratively to 
denote the severe bodily and mental 
sufferings to which our Lord was sub- 
jected. a9 20227nDD. The 1 is here 
to be taken ἐκβατικῶς ; and the 3 is 
the Caph veritatis. Literally: So that 
there was a hiding of face from him. 
The LXX., Aq., Vulg., and Targ., and 
some modern translators, have ren- 
dered the suffix in 1299 as that of the 
first person plural; but less aptly. 


Isaiah represents the Saviour as an 
object of disgust to the Jews, in lan- 
guage calculated to produce on the 
mind a strong impression of their 
hatred to his person and claims ; and 
closes the verse, as he had begun it, 
with 22: only adding a negative 
proposition for the sake of greater 
energy. 

4, ὯΝ is strongly adversative, and 
is designed pointedly to direct the 
attention of the reader to the fact, 
that the sorrow and grief which had 
just been attributed to the Messiah 
were not occasioned by any thing in 
himself, but were inflictions, which, 
but for his substitution, we must have 
borne. To mark this more distinctly, 
the identical words “7 and 3829 are 
repeated from the preceding verse. 
In both instances they denote in- 
flictions, or sufferings, on account of 
sin. Hence the LXX. and Symm. 
render: tds ἁμαρτίας ἡμῶν. Hengsten- 
berg appositely remarks, “ that no pas- 
sage in the New Testament, relative to 
the atoning death of Jesus, is more 
dogmatically definite than the present. 
No wonder that the unbelieving Jews 
should be perplexed in their attempts 
to interpret it. It is, and ever must 
be, a rock of offence to them while 
they reject the true Messiah, who died 
for our sins and was raised again for 
our justification.” For 17, eleven 
MSS., the Ven. Ed. of 1525—28, and 
seventeen other editions, have the full 
plural form, 27. And instead of 
ἜΝ ΘΟ, upwards of twenty MSS., and 
two editions, read 722829 ; but all, the 
ancient versions have the plural. Be- 
fore 0920, thirteen MSS., originally five 
more, now three; four editions, and 
many more, insert x7 as a Keri ; yet 
it is probably a mere repetition, by 
some copyist, from the preceding 
hemistich. It has been maintained 
by some, that the verbs x2 and 72D 
signify simply, to bear away, remove, 
&c., and convey no idea of suffering or 
bearing, in the way of punishment 3, 
but in direct opposition to fact, and 
to the spirit of the context. Not only 


ond 


398 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. LIII. 


Yea, it was our sorrows he carried. 
We, indeed, accounted him smitten, 


are the phrases, JY N02, NOT NDI, Zo 
bear sin, to bear iniquity, used of one 
who suffers for his own sin, but also 
of the expiation made for the sin of 
others, by vicarious suffering. See 
Ley. v. 1, 17, xvii. 16, xxiv. 15; Numb. 
ix. 13, xiv. 33; Exod. xxviii. 38; Lev. 
x. 17, xvi. 22. Thus also, in ver. 12 
of this very chapter, D27ROT 37) 
δ), Aud he bare the sin, i.e. the 
punishment due to the sin, of many. 
Comp., fora similar usage, in Arab. 


Koran, ¢xxix, 11. 12) οὐδ Je, 
w=, ὕλμω las] Ipiel ωοδὸν \yp3S 
“τ ak CaN Sane) heat 
μῶν ol pl cot ον 


“And the unbelievers say to those 
who believe : Follow our way, and we 
will bear your sins ; but they shall not 
bear any part of their sins, but they 
shall bear their own burdens.” In like 
manner, 72D signifies ¢o sustain or bear ; 
to bear as a burden what another cannot 
bear ; to bear what is imposed by another, 
either by oppression, or as punishment. 
Hence the nouns, 930, 535, %3D, 720, 
a burden. But it also signifies to bear 
or suffer vicariously,—the idea of the 
weight or burden of the punishment 
being necessarily implied. Thus Lam. 
v. 7, 920 ony ams, We bear their 
tniquities, 1.e. the infliction due to 
their iniquities ; their penal conse- 
quences. Comp. ver. 11 of this chap. 
7am xT ἘΠ νὴ, Hor he sustained the in- 
fliction of their iniquities. That such 
is the meaning of the verb here, Ge- 
senius himself allows. “ 51D,—trop. 
to bear the sorrows, sins, of any one, 
i.e. to suffer the punishment which 
another has merited,’ Heb. Lex. iz 
voc. ‘Thus also Winer, in his Edit. 
of Simonis: “trop. peccatum alicujus 
bajulare est peccati ponas gravis- 
simas perpeti,” Jes. liii. 11; Thren. 
v. 7. The words are also quoted 
in the ancient Rabbinical work, 


. 7 . t Us 
entitled Pesikfa; mwa wy mI sows 
“ 
1 ἼΩΝ TWA now) WL aD NOD ANN YP 
mow we Ὁ ΓΝ Sod mead ome aS 


judgment. 


pq? pow ὙΌΣ Se 0 ἼΩΝ PTY WON DD 
SIDR Ὁ ἼΩΝ NDI MTT PX PIT Nw ow 
mmow2 ome; “ When the blessed 
Creator made his world, he stretched 
out his hand under the throne of glory, 
and brought out the soul of the 
Messiah. He then said to him: Wilt 
thou heal and redeem my sons after 
six thousand years? He replied: 
Yes. Then God said to him: Wilt 
thou bear the inflictions in order to 
purge their iniquity, as it is written : 
But it was our diseases he bore? He 
said to him: I will bear them joyfully.” 
Such was the construction put upon 
it by the LXX.: Otros τὰς ἁμαρτίας 
ἡμῶν φέρει, καὶ περὶ ἡμῶν ὀδυνᾶται ; 
Symmachus, αὐτὸς ἀνέλαβε, καὶ τοὺς 
πόνους ὑπέμεινεν. To the doctrine of 
the vicarious sufferings of the Messiah, 
as here taught, it has been objected, 
that the words are quoted Matt. viii. 
17, in application to our Lord's re- 
moval of bodily diseases. But the 
objection would only be valid, if it 
could be shewn that the application 
made by the Evangelist was designed 
to exhaust the meaning of the pro- 
phet. The instances of miraculous 
cures were merely an incipient ful- 
filment of the prediction: a type or 
specimen of what was to be eftected 
by our Lord’s mediation generally. 
The Jews were taught to regard disease 
as the temporal punishment of sin ; 
and since the prophet clearly shews, 
in the following verse, that the end to 
be attained by the substitutionary 
sufferings of the Messiah, was the 
removal of punishment from the 
guilty, the quotation was appositely 
applied to the removal of bodily dis- 
tempers, as a partial attainment of 
that end. See Magee on the Atone- 
ment, vol. i. pp. 412—435, third edit., 
Lond. 1812. 13, smitten, by Divine 
The verb is specially ap- 
plied to the infliction of such diseases 
as the plague or leprosy. Hence 
Jerome renders, leprosus. Aq. ἀφή- 
μενον. Symm. ἐν ἁφῇ ὄντα. Theod. 
better, μεμαστιγῶμένον. The words, 
Tym ovis mp, are exegetical,—ex- 
pressing, in plain terms, the opinion 


CHAP. LIII.| 


ISAIAH. 


399 


Stricken by God, and afflicted : 

5 But he was wounded on account of our transgressions ; 
He was bruised on account of our iniquities : 
The infliction with a view to our peace was upon him, 


of the Jews, that the sufferings of our 
Lord were inflicted as the immediate 
punishment of great personal guilt. 
That they were accustomed to draw 
similar conclusions, see Luke xiii. 1; 
John ix. 2. That 39, smitten, is rightly 
pointed in the construct, and cannot 
be read as the absolute, as Bellarmine 
would have it, 1. 6. ὦ smitten God, is 
.sufficiently clear from the connexion. 

5. The prophet now describes in 
plain terms what he had expressed 
figuratively in the preceding verse. 
270, the Pass. Part. in Poel, might 
be rendered pierced,—being derived 


from 3, Arab gy perforatus est, to 


bore, pierce, ἕο. It would thus dis- 
tinctly recognise the piercing of the 
hands, feet, and side of our Redeemer, 
as described by the Evangelists. 
Comp. Ps. xxii. 16; Zech. xii. 10. 
But that it is better to adopt the more 
extended signification of the verb, 
appears from the general use of &379, 
following. Thus the LXX. érpavpa- 


τίσθη. Arab, or vulnus accepit ; 
Il. malta inflixit vuluera. The Syr. has 


Ψ 
Qo lsc , oecisus est ; a signification 


which > certainly has, Gen. xxxiv. 
27 ; Jer. xiv.18. 823, to break in small 
pieces, crush, expresses the excessive 
_ severity of our Lord’s sufferings. 


Comp. ver. 10 ; Luke xxii. 44; Matt. /xii. 20. 


xxvil. 46 ; Ps. xxii. 14—17. The pre- 
position 72 has here the causative 
| signification, and marks the causa 
eficiens, the immediate ground or 
reason of these sufferings. 329917 7079, 
lit. the punishment of our peace; but 
as such construction is altogether 
abhorrent from the English idiom, 
the phrase must be rendered peri- 
phrastically, the infliction by which our 


ppeace is effected, i. e. the exemplary 


' sufferings which were required in order 
to our enjoying immunity from punish- 
ment. The genitive is that of object, 
1D, being derived from 70, fo chasten, 


figuratively as a cure. 


correct, with a view to moral improve- 
ment, (hence fo teach, generally,) to 


punish, as a warning to others, conveys 


the idea of sufferings, which, while 
they atoned for our sins, and thereby 
procured for us reconciliation with 
God, furnished a public illustration of 
the great principles of his moral 
government. They were pana exem- 
plaris. This, however, is only a 
secondary idea, and must not be taken 
to the exclusion of suffering, which is 
the primary signification of the term. 
The LXX. have παιδεία ; but both 
παιδεία and παιδεύω are currently used 
by them in the sense of inflicting cas- 
tigation or punishment. See Magee, 


on v 
ut sup. p. 401; Syr. 1Zo2;80 > casti- 


gatio, correptio ; Arab. wo, instruxit, 
docuit, castigavit spec. verberibus. The 
use of 2, “wpon him,” plainly shews 
that vicarious punishment is meant, 
For 213, thirty-two MSS., orig. two 
more, and one in the marg.; four of 
the early, and thirty-one other 
editions, read 2194 in the plural, 
which would express the abundance 
and variety of blessings flowing to us 
through the death of the Messiah. 
The plural of this noun is not used 
elsewhere. For the doctrine, comp. 
chap. ix. 6 ; Micah v.5; Zech. vi. 13: 
Eph. ii. 14—17 ; Col. i. 20, 21 ; Heb. 
It distinctly expresses that 
transfer of our guilt on the one hand, 


/and of the merit of the Mediator on 
\the other, which lies at the foundation 
‘of the whole scheme of redemption. 


man is taken collectively, and must be. 
rendered in the plural. The personal 
pronouns of the third singular are 
emphatic and in striking antithesis 
with those of the first person. 8273, 
a partic. noun, from x2}, /o heal ; but~ 


| as diseases are spoken of in Scripture } 
/as a punishment for sin, so deliverance , 


from the effects of sin is represented 
Comp. chap. 
vi. 10, note ; Mark iv. 12; and ver, 4 


400 


ΙἸΒΑΙΔΉ. 


[CHAP. 1111. 


That by his stripes we might be healed. 
6 All we, like sheep, have gone astray ; 

We have turned each to his own way ; 

But Jehovah hath inflicted upon him the punishment of us all. 
7 He was severely afilicted, yet he submitted himself, 


And opened not his mouth ; 


of the present chapter. The adver- 
sative conjunction } refers back to 72x, 
ver. 4. It is well observed by Stier, 
that the whole passage, the whole 
prophet, much more the whole Scrip- 
ture, Rom. v. 10 not excepted, know 
nothing of enmity or wrath on the 
part of the Father, which required to 
be removed by the sufferings of Christ. 
The Saviour was never more the ob- 
ject of the Divine delight than when 
he suffered on the cross and in the 
garden of Gethsemane. The sufferings 
to which our Redeemer was subjected 
were no expression of Divine oppo- 
sition to him personally, but to our 
sins, for which he had undertaken to 
atone. 

6. A common but very significant 
metaphor, teaching the folly, diversity, 
universality, and guilt of sin. It is 
here specially introduced for the pur- 
pose of accounting for the intensity 
of the Messiah’s sufferings. Comp. 
Ps! exix. 176: 1 Pet. 11. 95. Οὔτε yap 
ἴσα πάντων τὰ πλημμελήματα, οὐδὲ εἷς 
ὁ τρόπος" ἄλλα γὰρ τὰ ᾿Αιγυπτίων εἴδωλα, 
καὶ ἄλλα τὰ Φοινίκων" καὶ τὰ Ἑλλήνων 
ἕτερα, καὶ ἄλλα τῶν Σκυθῶν" ἄλλ᾽ ὅμως 
εἰ καὶ διάφοροι τῆς πλάνης οἱ τρόποι, 
πάντες ὁμοίως τὸν ὄντα Θεὸν καταλελοι- 
πότες ἐῴκειμεν προβάτοις πλανωμένοις, 
καὶ προκειμένοις τοῖς λύκοις. 'Theodoret 
in loc. The same holds true of trans- 
gressors individually. No two sin 
precisely alike; but all, without ex- 
ception, are in a state of apostasy, 
guilt, and peril. The in 757 is ad- 
versative, and introduces the second 
member of the antithesis. 11 »257, ὅσο, 
the LXX. paraphrase, παρέδωκεν αὐτὸν 
ταῖς ἁμαρτίᾳις ἡμῶν ; but the verb 
properly signifies ¢o fall in with, or act 
upon any one, and is used both in a 
friendly and in a hostile sense. Here 
the latter obviously obtains; hence 
some interpreters render, with Kimchi, 
hostiliter in eum irruere fecit. Simply 


to lay upon, is too weak ; Symm. better, 
καταντῆσαι ἐποίησεν, caused to reach, 
i. 6. as the object on which the punish- 
ment was inflicted. Comp. Numb. 
xxxii. 23 ; and for the signification of 
vi2, in a hostile sense, Judg. vii. 21 ; 
1 Sam. xxii. 17; 2Sam.i.15; 1 Kings 
ii. 29; Amos v. 19. Punishment is 
here represented under the metaphor 
of a wild beast, to which straying 
sheep are exposed in the wilderness. 
It is eagerly looking out for its 
victims ; but, instead of falling in 
with them, it comes in contact with 
the shepherd himself, and while it 
attacks him, the sheep make their 
escape. Thus the Messiah, having as 
Mediator interposed himself between 
his people and the punishment which 
was coming upon them, received it . 
upon his sacred person in their 
room. Comp. Zech. xiii. 7; Matt. 
xxvi. 81; John x. 1—18; 1 Pet. 
ii. 24, 25. The transition from the 
condition of the sheep, in the former 
half of the antithesis, to that of the 
Shepherd, was natural and easy. }Y 
is a collective noun, which accounts 
for the ancient versions exhibiting 
the plural, 253253 are correlates, 

7. Cyril among the ancients, Sanc- 
tius, Sanchez, Hensler, Dathe, Kuinoel, 
Jahn, Lowth, Crusius, Moller, Green, 
Boothroyd, Jones, and others, render 
mr 817) 032, 790 was exacted, and he be- 
came answerable, or to this eftect ; and 
this rendering has generally been ap- 
proved by such as hold the doctrine 
of our Lord’s voluntary substitution. 
It is, however, to say the least, very 
doubtful whether such meaning can 
fairly be brought out of the words. 
It is certain none of the ancient trans- 
lators understood them so; Symm. 
προσηνάχθη καὶ αὐτὸς ὑπήκουσε; LXX. 
καὶ αὐτὸς διὰ τὸ κεκακῶσθαι ; Syr., 


reading 22 instead of 93, “550 


CHAP. LIII.] 


ISAIAH. 


401 


As a lamb that is led to the slaughter, 
Or as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, 


So he opened not his mouth. 


8 Without restraint, and without a sentence, he was taken away ; 


Vv τν - 
yasozio, accessit et humiliavit se; 


Vulg. oblatus est quia ipse voluit. 2 
signifies, indeed, fo press a debtor, to 
extort service, &c. ; but uniformly with 
the implication, that the debt or 
service is obtained from the individual 
against his will. The idea of tyran- 
nical oppression is likewise conveyed 
by the term, but manifestly in this 
connexion can only be attributed to 
the Jews, and not to any treatment 
of the Son of God by his Heavenly 
Father. Chap. lx. 17 forms no ex- 
ception, Ὁ 23, exvactors, being there 
qualified by the term ΠΣ, righteous- 
ness. "The verb occurs in Niphal only 
in three other passages; vz. 1 Sam. 
xiii. 6, xiv. 24; Isa. ii. 5; in all of 
which the idea of being distressed, 
oppressed, &c. is obviously that which 
is intended to be conveyed. In like 
manner, though 72%, the other verb 
here employed, signifies to respond, 
answer, announce, &¢c., it nowhere con- 
veys the notion of legal or moral 
responsibility. This signification has 
been transferred to it from the Latin, 
ad diem respondere. I am, therefore, 
compelled, on purely philological 
grounds, to reject the rendering in 
question, though I firmly believe the 
doctrine which it teaches. To 72Y2 in 
Niphal, I assign here, with Koppe, 
Jahn, Steudel, Hengstenberg, and 
Reinke, the reflexive signification, he 
submitted himself. Such construction 
is required by 81, preceding, and well 
agrees with the following description 
of the patience with which the Mes- 
siah endured his sufferings. Thus 
καὶ αὐτὸς ὑπήκουσε of Symm., and guia 
ipse voluit of Jerome. Comp. John 
x, 17, 185° Phil a.) 8.3, 7Hebis mith, 2; 
1 Pet. 11. 23. ὙΒ MAD. XD, at the end of 
the verse, is merely a repetition for 
the sake of emphasis: only the ) in 
8”) marks the apodosis. For the ful- 
filment, see the history of our Lord’s 
sufferings. 

8. The prophet now reaches the 


culminating point in his description 
of the sufferings of the Messiah, viz. 
the unjust death in which they ter- 
minated. That ΠΣ is used of a re- 
moval from among the living, see 
Gen. v. 24, xlii. 36; 2 Kings ii. 9; 
Jer. xv. 15; Ezek. xxiv. 16. ΝῺ is 
similarly used, Job xxxii. 22; and 
FON, Isa. Ivii. 1. Gesenius compares 


the Arab. 38 ai} Gav. And that 


such must be the signification of the 
verb here is plain, from the latter 
half of the verse. Perhaps no three 
words in the Hebrew Bible have been 
more variously rendered than Ww? 
mp wpa; LXX. ἐν τῇ ταπεινώσει 
(Just. Mar. and Chrysost. add αὐτοῦ) 


π᾿ 


«δὸ 


ν ρ ~ 
922} .; «90, 6 carcere et ex judi- 


oO ΕΝ 
ἡ κρίσις αὐτοῦ ἤρθη; ὅγν. ἰχοξα 


cio raptus est ; Arab. ral ᾽ KK, judi- 


cium ejus raptus est ; Vulg. De angustia, 
et de judicio sublatus est ; Jewish Span. 
de detenimiento y de juizio fue tomado ; 
and thus generally the Rabbins, and 
by Calvin, Gesenius, Hitzig, and 
Scholz: only Calvin and others ex- 
plain 779 of our Lord’s being taken 
up to glory. Déderlein, Dathe, and 
others, take Hawam WY to be a hen- 
diadis, and translate, post angustias 
judicitt ad suppliciam rapitur ; Lowth, 
Tingstadius, and Jones, fy an oppres- 
sive judgment he was taken off. By 
another class of interpreters the pre- 
position 79 is taken in its negative or 
privative acceptation: Zwinglius, iz- 
dicta causa citraque judicium tolletur ; 
Leo Juda, Absque dilatione citraque 
judicium vaptus est ; Coverdale, He shal 
be had awaie, his cause not herd, and 
without any judgement; Luzzatto, On 
Pemportait (on le tuait) sans autorité 
souveraine, et sans justice, Cest-a-dire : 
on pouvait le tuer impunément. This 
construction seems preferable to any 
other ; only 1? is to be taken in its 


402 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. 1111. 


And who can describe his generation ? 
For he was cut off from the land of the living ; 
On account of the transgression of my people he was smitten. 


usual signification, restraint, hindrance, 
and ΒΡ in that of sentence, judicial 
sentence. Instead of restraining the 
Jews from carrying into effect their 
murderous purpose against our Lord, 
Pilate “delivered” him “to their 
will.” Luke xxiii, 25. Nor as pro- 
curator, occupying the judgment-seat, 
Matt. xxvii. 19, did he pronounce a 
formal sentence upon him, but merely 
decided (éméxpwe) that it should be 
as the Jews required, Luke xxiii. 24. 
WP Ὁ is used Judges xviii. 7, to 
express the office and authority of a 
magistrate, exercised in restraining 
from the commission of lawless 
deeds.—Of the different interpreta- 
tions that have been given of “ἦτ, 
generation, such as eternal production ; 
length of life; manner of life; pos- 
terity ; men living at the same time ; the 
last alone is justifiable on the ground 
of Hebrew usage. It only signifies 
posterity when used in the plural, 
and even then only such of a poste- 
rity as are contemporaries. LXX. 


γενεὰ ; Saad. >, corresponding to 


the use of ἦτ, Gen. vii. 1 ; Eccles i. 4. 
Storr, Déderlein, Dathe, Rosenmiiller, 
Gesenius, and others, take ‘i7nx, 
though the accusative, to be equiva- 
lent to the nominative absolute, and 
render, Who of his contemporaries con- 
sidered that he was, &c.; but such con- 
struction is not so natural as that 
which regards it as strictly the accu- 
sative absolute, “And as to the men 
of his time, who can conceive of 
them?” 1.6. their atrocious wicked- 
ness. The verb m2, of which mi» is 
the Pilel, signifies 70 conceive in the 
mind, meditate, and then to give utter- 
ance to such conceptions ; LXX. διη- 
ynoera. The best comment on the 
words is furnished by the testimony 
of Josephus, de Bell. Jud. lib. v. cap. 
13, sect. 6. Οἶμαι ‘Popaidy βραδυνόν- 
τῶν ἐπὶ τοὺς ἀλιτηρίους, ἢ καταποθῆναι 
ἂν ὑπὸ χάσματος, ἢ κατακλυσθῆναι τὴν 
πόλιν, ἢ τοὺς τῆς Σοδομηνῆς μεταλαβεῖν 
κηραυτοῦς" πολὺ γὰρ τῶν ταῦτα παθόν- 


των ἤνεγκε ΓΈΝΕΑΝ ἀθεωτέραν. “I 
deem it, that if the Romans had de- 
layed to come against these wretches, 
the city would have been swallowed 
up by an earthquake, or overwhelmed 
by a deluge, or experienced the same 
fate with Sodom: for it bore a more 
impious GENERATION than those which 
suffered such things.” And again, 
cap. x. sect. 5. μήτε TENEAN ἐξ αἰῶνος 
γεγονέναι κακίας γονιμωτέραν. “Nor 
was there ever from the beginning of 
the world A GENERATION more prolific 
in wickedness.” Comp. Matt. xii. 39, 
xxiii. 33; Luke xi. 48—51. ὋΣ, Arab. 


25» occidit, to cut, cut off, slay, kill, 


expresses the violent death of the 
Messiah. Comp. Dan. ix. 26, where 
ΤῊ is similarly used. Ps. Ixxxviii. 6; 
Lam. 111. 54. The pronom. affix in Ὅν, 
refers to the prophet, who, as fre- 
quently, includes himself among the , 
people. For in} the LXX. have read | 
ny, εἰς θάνατον, smitten unto death. ὦ 
Thus also the versions which have ἡ 
been made from the LXX.; but the 
reading is confirmed by no Heb. MS., 
and by no other independent autho- 
rity. On the contrary, Symm., 
Theod., the Targ., Syr., and Jerome, 
all express the pronoun. And _ that 
the two first so translated, clearly 
proves that nyo? was not the reading 
of the text in the time of Origen, as 
Kennicott, in Lowth, contends. In 
the dispute of that father with the 
Jews, the argument did not turn upon 
the rendering of this particular word, 
but upon ὍΣ, τοῦ λαοῦ pov, my people, 
from whom the person spoken of 
is evidently distinguished. On this 
being urged, the Jew who had objected 
that it was not one man, but one 
people that was meant, was silenced, 
Orig. con, Celsum, lib. i. p, 370, edit. 
1733. The proposed emendation is, 
therefore, justly rejected by Gesenius, 
Hitzig, Scholz, and other moderns. It 
is contended by Gesenius and others 
that in 19%, the poetical suffix is 
plural and not singular; but the’ 


CHAP. 1.111.} 


ISAIAH. 


403 


9 They had also assigned him his grave with the wicked, 
But he was with the rich after his death : 
Because he had done no violence, 
Neither was deceit found in his mouth. 


latter alone suits the context, and is 
decidedly to be so taken, chap. xliv. 
15, where it refers to 908, and is con- 
_ verted into 19, ver. 17. See also Gen. 
ix. 26, 27; and comp. Job xx. 23, 
xxii. 2, xxvii. 23, for a similar use of 
jo%y in the singular. In the last of 
these passages the form is irhmedi- 
ately changed into vv. Thus the 
Syr. and Vulg. 

9. 15, lit. and he gave, i.e. destined, 
appointed, assigned ; but this form of 
the verb is very often used imperson- 
ally, as in the German, Man gab; or 
the French, Oz avait ordonné ; and is 
best rendered by an English plural. 
The meaning is, that our Saviour was 
destined by the Jews to have the 
ignoble burial of those who under- 
went capital punishment. Ὃ δὲ βλασ- 
φημήσας Θεὸν καταλευσθεὶς κρεμάσθω 
Ov ἡμέρας, καὶ ἀτίμως καὶ ἀφανῶς θαπ- 
τέσθω. “ Let him who blasphemes 
God be stoned and hanged for a day, 
and have a disgraceful and obscure 
burial.” Josephus, Antiq. iv. 8. 6. 
See also Iken. in Bib]. Hagana, ii. p. 
215. nx before DY is not the sign 
of the accusative, as it has been 
taken by the LXX., Symm., Vulg,, 
and Targ., but is used as a preposition 
in the sense of with. Thus Saad. 


od opel te Jex>s, and so 


Gesenius, Hitzig, and other moderns, 
confirming thereceived interpretation. 
Even Rosenmiller falls in with it, in 
the last edition of his Scholia. Several 
interpreters, among whom Luther, 
Calvin, Rosenmiiller, Gesenius, Hitzig, 
Maurer, take Vey to be parallel with 
Dyw, and give to it the signification 
of impious, ungodly, or the like ; mostly 
on the ground that riches are fre- 
quently the source of pride, arrogance, 
and wickedness. This transition of 
meaning, however, Hitzig scruples not 
to designate a fiction, and has re- 
course, with Martini and Koppe, to 


the Arab. ye , to stumble, take a wrong 


step, &c.; but neither this verb, nor 
any of its derivatives, appear ever to 
have been used in the sense of crimin- 
ality. In the Hebrew Bible vey uni- 
formly signifies rich, and it depends 
upon the circumstances of the con- 
text what character is to be attached 
to the individual thus designated. 


Saad. ppdtund | 92 cum opulentis ; 


Jewish Span. coz rico. In vay ny) the 
Ὑ is adversative, and the subst. verb. 
m1 is to be supplied. That Joseph of 
Arimathea is meant no one can doubt 
who impartially compares the gospel 
history. Matt. xxvii, 57—61. yn103, 
Abenezra, Forerius, Ccolampadius, 
Zwinglius, Schindler, Drusius, Kenni- 
cott, Lowth, Jubb, Kuinoel, Martini, 
Moller, Jenour, Noyes, and others, 
render, iz his sepulchre—taking the 2 
to be radical, and the noun to be the 
plural construct of 793, a high place: 
—and attaching to it the idea of ἐω- 
mulus. From no other passage, how- 
ever, can it be shewn, that ni02mean 
tumuli, or sepulchral mounds. On the 
contrary, they always mean either 
heights in general, or specifically the 
high places so frequently mentioned in 
the O. T., where idolatrous worship 
was performed. Ezek. xliii. 7, forms 
no exception; for the connexion there 
requires us to point Onin2, iz or afler 
their death, which some of De Rossi’s 
MSS. exhibit. It is also the punctua- 
tion of the Sone. Edition, and is con- 
firmed by the rendering of the Tar- 
gum. Wherever nin: takes the suffix, 
it retains the Kametz, as Lev. xxvi. 
30; Isa. xxxvi. 7. I, therefore, adhere 
to the interpretation of the LXX., 
Targ. Syr., Vulg., and most modern 
versions, a8 those of Vitringa, Micha- 
elis, Rosenmiiller, Tingstadius, Dathe, 
Gesenius, Hitzig, Hengstenberg, Ewald, 
Reinke, Scholz, Jones, &c., according 
to which 3 is the preposition, and yn 
the regular plural of m2, death, with 
the pronom. suffix. We find the plural 
used Ezek. xxviii. 10, to express a 


404 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. LIII. 


10 But Jehovah was pleased to bruise him; he put him to grief: 
Verily, if he make himself a sacrifice for sin, 
He shall see his seed, he shall live long, 
And the pleasure of Jehovah shall prosper in his hand. 


violent death, or as Jarchi explains it, 
nya Ὁ 75, all kinds of death. 1t is thus 
intensive in force, and expresses the 
awful nature of that death to which 
our Lord submitted. 3,1 have ren- 
dered after, on the authority of Lev. 
xi. 31; 1 Kings xiii. 31 ; Esther ii. 7, 
where the preposition has this mean- 
ing before the Infin. of nm. Comp. 
other passages in Noldius. The mean- 
ing is, that on his death, and while he 
remained in a state of death, his body 
was with, or in the tomb of, a rich 
man. ἢ following, satisfactorily shews 
that the two preceding hemistichs 
form an antithesis, and that it is to 
be restricted to the latter of them ; 
for there would be no propriety in as- 
signing the innocence of the Messiah 
as the cause why he was ignominiously 
treated by his enemies. The conjec- 
ture of Le Clerc, which Kennicott 
adopts, that 27 and "103 have changed 
places, is totally unsupported. 

10. The Conjun. in 77 is resumptive 
and confirmatory, connecting what fol- 
lows with 7i™, ver.6. Whatever hand 
man might have in the death of the 
Redeemer, it was, nevertheless, the 
result of the gracious purpose of God. 
Comp. Acts il, 23. 27 Isat refer back 
to m2 and 8279, ver. 5. 7 is an 
Aramaic form for 7777, the Hiph. of 
mn, to be in pain, suffer grief, &e. Dx, 
if, so far from being here a particle of 
doubt, rather expresses the certainty 
of what is affirmed; only the state- 
ment is put hypothetically, for the 
purpose of laying down the condition 
of the following predictions respecting 
the success of the Messiah’s under- 
taking. It forms the point of transi- 
tion from the use of the Preterite to 
that of the Future tense. His sacri- 
fice was still future, but it should cer- 
tainly be presented, and issue in the 
specified results. In such cases, D8 has 
all the native force of its derivation 


from j2x, Arab. ul, which convey the 


idea of firmness, security, certainty, &c. 
Whether own be the second person 
masculine, or the third feminine, (both 
being alike in form,) has been dis- 
puted. To the former mode of con- 
struction, it cannot fairly be objected 
that it would occasion too violent a 
change of person, since many such 
abrupt changes occur in the prophets. 
And, as such a degree of prominence 
had just been given to the act of 
the Father in bruising the Son, there 
might, to the mind of a Hebrew, ap- 
pear a singular propriety in the mo- 
mentary adoption of the direct form 
of address. Still, it seems more in 
accordance with the usual reciprocal 
force of 152, his soul, for himself, and 
especially as occurring immediately 
after, ver. 12, to take the verb as the 
third feminine, agreeing with Ὁ Ὲ).--- Ὁ Ὁ 
is used intransitively, as in 1 Kings | 
xx. 12; so that the literal rendering 
of νῦ8) ove DA DX will be, Truly if 
his soul make itself a sacrifice for guilt; 
i.e. if he lay down his life as a propi- 
tiatory sacrifice. Comp. παρέδωκεν 
‘EAYTON ὑπὲρ ἡμῶν προσφορὰν καὶ 
θυσίαν, Eph. v. 2. Comp. also Matt. 
xx. 28; Gal. i. 4; Heb. ix. 14. The 
doctrine taught in these passages, and 
in our text, is that of our Lord’s 
voluntary substitution of himself as a 
victim to expiate human guilt. Be- 
tween DWX and nxen there is no fur- 
ther difference, than that the latter 
relates to the sinful act, considered 
simply in itself: the former to its 
guilt as affecting the individual, in the 
way of exposing him to punishment. 
This liability the Messiah took upon 
himself, and actually endured the 
punishment due to others. Both 
terms are sacrificial, and are fre- 
quently used in the Levitical law. 
The “seed” of the Messiah are such 
as should believe in him, being born 
again through the instrumentality of 
his Gospel, James i. 18; 1 Pet. i. 23, 
25. In the East, Christians are called 


CHAP. LIII. | 


ISAIAH. 


405 


11 After the sorrow of his soul, he shall see it, and be satisfied ; 
By the knowledge of himself shall my Righteous Servant 


justify many ; 


For he shall bear their iniquities. 


ἐπ Ovo, the family of the Messiah. 


Comp. Ps. xxii. 30. The LXX., Vulg., 
and some moderns, among whom 
Lowth, connect D> JS with yy, and 
render, a long-lived posterity, or a seed 
which shall prolong their days ; but the 
construction which refers both verbs 
to a common subject, viz. the Messiah, 
is more appropriate. It is the con- 
structio asyndeta. Thus the Syr., 
Vitringa, Déderlein, Dathe, Hensler, 
Tingstadius, van der Palm, Rosenmiil- 
ler, Gesenius, Hitzig, Hengstenberg, 
Reinke, Scholz, and Jenour. Comp. 
Ps. Ixxii. 15 ; Heb. vii. 16, 25 ; Rev. i. 
18. 77 yh means not simply the 
cause of Jehovah, as Gesenius inter- 
prets, but such cause as that in which 
Jehovah takes peculiar delight. Like 
εὐδοκία in the N. T., it implies special 
good-will, or favour. The term seems 
to have been selected here to corres- 
pond with ye 7m at the beginning of 
the verse. 173, iz his hand, i.e. through 
his instrumentality. 

. 11. The prophet prosecutes the idea 
of the reward to be enjoyed by the 
Messiah, as the result of his painful 
sufferings. The verb 781 cannot be 
construed with }2 in the sense of seeing 
of, 1. 6. “ the fruit of,” which our com- 
mon version expresses. Such con- 
struction would imply that only a 
part or portion should be seen. The 
preposition is rather used in the sense 
of after, from the tinie of, as in Ps. lxxiii. 
20, ya DYT2, “as a dream after one 
awakes.” 'The prophets predicted the 
sufferings of Christ, and the glory ¢hat 
should follow, 1 Pet.i.11. ὋΝ signifies 
labour, toil, sorrow, travail, &c., but has 
no reference whatever to the sorrows 
of childbirth, as some have explained 
the term ¢ravail in our common ver- 


sion. Arab. ὡ,., Jecit, operatus fuit. 


Hence the fatigue, exhaustion, &c., 
resulting from manual labour. The 
object to WY, he shall see, is YU, seed, 


in the preceding verse; so that we 
have here another instance of re- 
sumptive prediction, Y2w! TNT is again 
the constructio asyndeta, as in ver. 10. 
The latter verb signifies to have abun- 
dance, to be supplied to the full, and 
expresses the immense number of 
converts whom it would be the Re- 
deemer’s joy to contemplate. inv, his 
knowledge, is the genitive of object: 
the knowledge which respects the 
Messiah; a spiritual acquaintance 
with him and his propitiatory suffer- 
ings just described. In "iv PY, my 
righteous servant, the adjective is placed 
first, for the sake of emphasis, in 
order that the idea of righteousness, 
expressed, by the preceding verb, 71, 
might be more prominently exhibited. 
See on chap. xxviii. 21. The charge 
of solecism, therefore, brought for- 
ward by Lowth, is without foundation. 
That the righteousness intended is 
the meritorious righteousness of 
Christ, on account of which sinners 
obtain the pardon of sin, and the 
consequent blessings of salvation, 
must be evident to all who are fami- 
liar with the Scripture use of the 
terms, PAST, WI, δικαιόω, δικαιοσύνη, 
δίκαιος, in connexion with the execu- 
tion of the scheme of mercy. See 
chap. xlv. 24; Jer. xxiii. 6; Acts xiii. 
38, 39; Rom. iii. 21—28, iv. 5—8, 25, 
v. 16—19; 2 Cor. v. 21; Phil. iii. 9. 
The context abundantly shews that 
the verb p27 is used in the forensic 
sense, and not in that of moral im- 
provement. 27727 is unique, but 
seems designed to teach the actual 
communication of the blessing of jus- 
tification to such as believe. Comp. 
2777, chap. xiv. 3; 217, Gen. xlv. 
7. Jin ony is causal, assigning the 
reason why the Messiah was qualified 
to impart righteousness or justification 
to sinners—his having suffered the 
punishment due to their guilt. For 
the signification of 520, see on ver. 4. 


=+) 


3E 


406 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. LIII. 


12 Therefore, I will divide for him a portion among the great; 
And with the strong he shall divide the spoil ; 
Because he poured out his soul unto death, 
And was numbered with transgressors, 


12. In this verse the reward of the 
Messiah is more distinctly announced 
in metaphors borrowed from the 
ancient military life, in which a vic- 
torious general had conferred upon 
him, by his monarch, the spoils which 
he had won, and again distributed 
them among the soldiers. He was to 
have a glorious triumph as a compen- 
sation for the sufferings which he 
should endure. After i>pins, J will 
divide to him, 7, his portion, is under- 
stood. The LXX., Vulg., followed by 
the Fathers, and, among the moderns, 
by Hensler, Lowth, Martini, Dathe, 
Boothroyd, Hengstenberg, Reinke, and 
Jones, render O32 and D'nzY ΤΙΝ as ac- 
cusatives, and thus represent the 
great and mighty as constituting the 
spoil given to our Lord. But the 
more natural construction of the 
words is that given in our common 
version,—3 being rendered wmong, and 
Mx, with. That the latter is properly 
so rendered, is clear from the parallel 
use of this particle as a prepos., Prov. 
xvi. 19: 908 pom ony ow 31 
ΝΣ, “It is better to be of a lowly 
spirit with the humble, than fo divide 
the spoil with the proud.” Comp. 
OPLEDY, “with transgressors,” in this 
very verse, and Drwrny, “with the 


wicked,” ver. 9. And, to satisfy the. 


law of parallelism, 3 must be suffered 
to retain its usual signification of with, 
among, or such like. This construc- 
tion is accordingly approved by Leo 
Juda, Castalio, Calvin, Hezel, Rosen- 
miiller, Gesenius, Riickert, Hitzig, 
Noyes, and Scholz, as the more philo- 
logically correct. The meaning thus 
brought out is, that, as the great and 
mighty have extended their conquests 
in the world, and brought home abun- 
dance of spoil, to be distributed ac- 
cording to custom, so the Messiah, 
having gained the victory in the infi- 
nitely important spiritual conflict in 
which he was to engage, should not 
be behind them, but should receive a 


reward suitable to the conquest he 
was to gain; and likewise, on his 
part, bestow rewards on his followers. 
Comp. Luke xxii. 29; John xvii. 22 ; 
Rey. iii. 21. The reading p30 instead 
of γῆν, found in one of De Rossi’s 
MSS., and supported by the LXX. 
and Arab., has in all probability origi- 
nated in a desire to introduce unifor- 
mity into this part of the verse-—The 
prophet is so full of the amazing love 
of the Messiah in laying down his life 
for transgressors, that though by using 
the causal particle 133, se ee at the 
beginning of the verse, he had shewn 
that his sufferings previously specified 
constituted the ground of his reward, 
yet he once more resumes the subject, 
which he introduces with the empha- 
tic Wx nA, eo quod, pro co quod, in re- 
ward for. The words, 105) nyo? My, 
forcibly express the voluntary and un- 
reserved exposure to death, to which 
our Lord submitted in our room. 9, 


Arab. sy signifies to be bare, naked, 


&e.; in’ Piel and Hiph. to make bare, 
empty, pour out. It occurs in the for- 
mer of these conjugations, Ps. exli. 8, 
»0D) ym bs, “Suffer not my soul to be 
poured out,” z.e. by the enemy. "1%, 
to blast, make bare, is similarly used 
Judg. v. 18, min? Wwe) FT OY, “a people 
that exposed their soul to die,’ LXX. 
eis θάνατον, ΓΛ), to death. The Arabs 


γῈ13 
employ the phrases du23 Cla, effudit 
animam suam, in the same sense. 
Comp. Phil. ii. 7, ἑαυτὸν "EKENQZE, 
“he emptied himself.” 322 is an in- 
stance of the imperfect or indefinite 
future, intimating that the interces- 
sion of the Messiah was not to bea 
transient act, or such an act as would 
be completed at the time of his death, 
but that it would consist in an action 
continuously carried on in future 
time. For the fulfilment, see Luke 
xxiii. 34; Rom. viii. 34; Heb. vii. 25 ; 
1 John ii. 1. For the general signifi- 


CHAP. 110.] 


And bare the sin of many, 


ISATAH. 


407 


And made intercession for the transgressors. 


cation of 28, see on chap. xlvii. 3, and 
liii. 6. As used here in Hiphil with 3, 
it means, fo present the cause of another, 
to use one’s influence for his benefit. 

So manifestly is the doctrine of 
atonement taught in this important 
section of the prophet, that Gesenius 
himself is compelled to acknowledge 
it in the following terms: “Most 


Hebrew readers, who were previously 
familiar with the ideas of sacrifice and 
substitution, must necessarily have 
taken this view of the passage ; and 
it cannot be doubted, that the apo- 
stolic representation of the death of 
Christ as an atonement pre-eminently 
rests upon this basis.” Comment, il, 
Theil. p. 191. 


CHAPTER LIV. 


Having finished his description of the sufferings and triumphs of the Messiah, 
the prophet resumes his address to the church of God, which he had called 
to depart from Babylon, chap. lii. 11 ; but modifies it, in accordance with 
those views into the distant future with which he was favoured by the 
Spirit of prophecy. He sets out by predicting the amazing increase of the 
church after her restoration to the land of Judea, 1; and the extension of 
her boundaries into the desolate regions of paganism, 2—5. Grounds of 
encouragement are then drawn from the Divine love and faithfulness, 6— 
10; and assurances are given of her future glory, security, and happiness, 
11—17. Some consider the chapter to be exclusively applicable to the 
Jews, as a people ; but the interpretation put upon ver. 1, by the Apostle, 
Gal. iv. 27, and the facts of history, militate against such application. 
Though Isaiah does not lose sight of that people as originally constituting 
the church, yet, having his eye upon the spiritual seed of the Messiah, to 
be chiefly collected from the heathen world, he merges for the time the 
peculiar interests of Judaism in those of the universal church. 


1 Srye, O barren! that didst not bear ; 
Burst into song, and shout, thou that wast not in travail! 


1. It is not the state of the Gentile 
world that is here contrasted with 
that of the Jews, but the desolate or 
widowed condition of the latter, con- 
trasted with their happy state before 
their divorce at the captivity. By the 
moniwn2, the children of the desolate, are 


meant the members of the church 
which had been desolate during that 
captivity, but was now viewed as 
flourishing under the reign of the 
Messiah. The prophet had already 
predicted the vast increase of the Jew- 
ish people, chap. xlix. 18—22. This 


408 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. LIY. 


For more are the children of the desolate, 
Than the children of the married wife, saith Jehovah. 


2 Hnlarge the place of thy tent ; 


Yea, stretch out the cords of thy dwellings ; spare not ; 
Lengthen thy cords, and strengthen thy stakes. 
3 For thou shalt break forth to the right and to the left ; 
Thy seed also shall inherit the nations, 
And shall people the desolate cities. 
4 Fear not, for thou shalt not be ashamed ; 
Neither be confounded, for thou shalt not be put to shame ; 
For thou shalt forget the shame of thy youth ; 
And the reproach of thy widowhood thou shalt remember no 


more. 


5 For thy Maker is thy husband ; 


Jehovah of Hosts is his name ; 


he here repeats, with special reference 
to the spiritual church. In the apo- 
stolic age numerous myriads (πόσαι 
μυριάδες, Acts xxi. 20) of Jews believed 
in Jesus as the Messiah, while the 
number of Gentile converts exceeded 
all calculation. To the Christian com- 
munity, composed of both, the Apo- 
stle obviously applies the words, Gal. 
iv. 26, 27, where he contrasts the 
literal Jerusalem—the representative 
of such of the Jews as continued in 
unbelief—with the spiritual Jerusa- 
lem, or Christian church, the mother 
of all believers, whether from among 
Jews or Gentiles. That the Rabbins 
considered the passage to havea bear- 
ing on the times of the Messiah, see 
Midrash Shir Hashirim ad Cant. i. 5. 
2, 3. This beautiful metaphor is 
taken from the pastoral life, which, in 
the East, renders movable habitations 
absolutely necessary. The Orientals 
have two kinds of tents, the one 
larger, and the other smaller; but 
both constructed much in the same 
way. ‘They are sustained by poles, 
more or fewer in number, according to 
the size of the tent, but the tallest is 
always in the midst ; while the others 
suspend the covering round the sides. 
This covering is made of a stuff woven 
from wool and camel’s hair ; it hangs 
down like a curtain over the side- 
poles, and is fastened by cords to 


wooden pegs, which are firmly driven 
into the ground. Other cords, fastened 
at the one end to the tops of the 
poles, and at the other to pegs or 
stakes, keep the tent steady, and se- 
cure it against the violence of storms. 
As the family increases, it is pro- 
portionally enlarged, and requires the 
cords to be longer, and the stakes to 
be stronger in proportion. By “ΠΝ, 
tent, is meant the entire habitation ; 
by niz2u02, divellings, the different com- 
partments into which it was divided 
by the smaller curtains suspended 
from the roof. ™™ is future, but de- 
rives an imperative force from the 
preceding ’2177.—The future members 
of the church should occupy the 
localities formerly possessed by idola- 
ters, and characterised by spiritual 
desolation. Comp. chap. xlix. 8. 

4, The youth of the Jewish Church 
was the period of her servitude in 
Egypt ; her widowhood, that of the 
captivity in Babylon. Comp. Jer. ii. 
2; Ezek. xvi. 22 ; Jer. li. 5, jo; Lam. 
ae. 

5. Jehovah, to whom the church 
owed her existence, was still, and 
would continue to be, her husband, in 
communion with whom she might 
reckon on the enjoyment of her 
matrimonial privileges. Comp. John 
iii, 29; Rom. vii. 4; 2 Cor. xi. 2; 
Eph. v, 23—33. Instead, however, of 


CHAP. 110.] 


ISATAH. 


409 


And thy Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel : 
The God of the whole earth he shall be called. 
6 For Jehovah hath called thee as a forsaken, spirit-broken 


female ; 


And as a wife of youth, though thou wast rejected, 


Saith thy God. 


7 For a smail moment have I forsaken thee, 
But with the greatest tenderness I will gather thee. 

8 Inan outpouring of wrath I hid my face from thee for a moment ; 
But with everlasting kindness I will be merciful to thee, 


Saith thy Redeemer, Jehovah. 


9 For this is to me as the waters of Noah ; 
As I swore that the waters of Noah should not again overflow 


the earth, 


So have I sworn, that I will not be angry with thee, nor rebuke 


thee. 
10 


Though the mountains should be removed, 


And the hills should be shaken, 


sustaining this relation to her, as 
composed of Jews only, and occupying 
the contracted territory of Canaan, he 
was to sustain it to all, throughout 
the world, who should enter her pale. 
Comp. Zech. xiv. 9 ; Mal. i. 11; John 
xi. 52; Acts xv. 14—17; Rom. iii. 29. 
53 and δον are plurals after the 
model of ox. The latter occurs 
again Ps. cxlix. 2; LXX. Κύριος ὁ 
ποιῶν oe. For the idiomatic force of 
N17, see on chap, 1. 26. 

6. Mark the paronomasia in 722 
and mnzy. By ony) nex, a wife of 
youth, is meant one who is married to 
a person in his youth, to whom his 
affection may be expected to be strong. 
Such was the affection of God towards 
his people, notwithstanding the for- 
lorn condition to which they had been 
reduced. Though they had been re- 
jected, they were to be again received 
into favour. 

7, 8. The period of the Babylonish 
captivity, and that of the gospel dis- 
pensation, are here contrasted. Not 
only should the church be restored, 
but she should enjoy the highest 
felicity in the everlasting favour of 
her God. Such a state might consist 
with outward afflictions in the kingdom 


of heaven, Mark x. 30; John xvi. 33 ; 
I Thessti, δι; ΕΘ. ΧΑ: ΤΕ τ, Or 
how ill soever these might accord with 
the principles of the ancient theocracy. 
AER ΣΦ form a paronomasia, The 
former term is a ἅπαξ )ey., but ob- 
viously synonymous with ἢ, Comp. 


Prov. xxvii. 4; and the Arab. ks, 


dura et angusta fuit vita; hardship, 
adversity, &¢.—the effect, of which the 
cause is expressed by the Hebrew. 

9. There is an ellipsis of 3 before 
the former 2, just as there is before 
wx, Inattention to this circumstance, 
which is of common occurrence, has 
led Symm., Theod., the Syr., Vulg., 
Targ., and Saad., to unite 2 °D so as 
to form one word, "2; reading δ᾽", day, 
in the plural, instead of 0, waters. 
To the same cause is doubtless to be 
ascribed the occurrence of "22 in some 
few MSS. The conjunction 3 could not 
have been omitted. Nv, ¢is calamity. 
Gen. viii. 21 ; ix. 11. 

10. ὃ 3, my covenant of peace, 
i.e. the new covenant which I am 
about to make with you, by which 
I guarantee to you reconciliation and 
spiritual prosperity. Comp. chap. 111. 
5, liv. 18 ; Ezek. xxxiv. 25, xxxvii, 26 ; 


410 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. LIV. 


Yet my lovingkindness shall not be removed from thee, 
Nor shall my covenant of peace be shaken, 
Saith Jehovah, that sheweth thee mercy. 


11 


O thou afflicted ! storm-tossed, unconsoled ! 


Behold! I will lay thy stones in stibium, 
And will found thee with sapphires. 


12 


I will also make thy battlements of rubies, 


And thy gates of sparkling gems; 
And all thy borders of precious stones. 


13 


All thy children likewise shall be taught by Jehovah ; 


And great shall be the peace of thy children. 


14 


Thou shalt be established in righteousness ; 


Thou shalt be far from oppression, 


For thou shalt not fear ; 
And from terror, 


For it shall not come near thee. 


Zech. vi. 13. The phrase seems to 
have been suggested by the reference 
made in the preceding verse to the 
Divine engagement to Noah, which 
God calls his πὴ, Gen. ix.9,11. That 
these promises cannot apply to the 
past history of the Jews as a nation, 
is evident from the fact of their 
present dispersion, which has con- 
tinued nearly eighteen centuries. 

11, 12. I now adopt Alexander’s ren- 
dering of MD, as being at once more 
literal and also more forcible. On 
this verse Lowth aptly remarks, that 
these seem to be general images to 
express beauty, magnificence, purity, 
strength, and solidity, agreeably to 
the ideas of the Eastern nations, and 
to have never been intended to be 
strictly scrutinized, or minutely and 
particularly explained, as if each of 
them had some precise moral or spi- 
ritual meaning. A similarly splendid 
description of the happy state of the 
millennial church is found Rev. xxi. 
18—21. Ἢ, stibivm, or antimony, in 


Arab. 


compounded of lead and zinc, and 
moistened with oil or vinegar, with 
which the Oriental females paint the 
edges of the eye-lids, thereby giving 
them a black colour, and so apparently 
enlarging the eyes, as to render their 


, a fine mineral powder, 


effect more powerful. The prophet 
compares the cement to this black 
compound, to intimate that the beauty 
of the stones would thereby be aug- 
mented. See for the word, 2 Kings 
ix. 30; 1 ‘Chron. xxix. 2'; Jer. iv: 30. 
By nvwow, LXX. ἐπάλξεις, parapets, or 
notched battlements, but why so called 
it is difficult to say, except it be that 
they admitted the rays of the sun. 
Lit. suns. 

13. The former half of this verse 
our Lord quotes in proof of the 
necessity of Divine teaching, John 
γἱ. 45. TMD) lit. disciples of Jehovah. 
Comp. chap. viii. 16; Jer. xxxi. 34; 
Heb. viii. 11 ; and θεοδίδακτοί, 1 Thess. 
iv. 9. By which is meant not merely, 
or chiefly, the teaching of God by 
the precepts of the Gospel, but that 
Divine teaching by the Hoty Spirit, 
whereby not so much the intellect is 
enlightened, as thé heart is touched, 
and the affections swayed. Bloom- 
field, iz loc. See also 1 John ii. 27. 
For the latter half of the verse, comp. 
John xiv. 27, and Phil. iv. YB ἡ εἰρήνη 
τοῦ Θεοῦ ἡ ὑπερέχουσα πάντα νοῦν. 

14, ‘7m, be far, has here the power 
of the fature, from the preceding 
verb, Since the New Testament 
church has been the subject of awful 
oppressions, this prophecy must have 
special reference to the millennial 


CHAP. LY.] 


ISAIAH. 


411 


15 If they at all assemble, it is not from me ; 
Whoever may assemble against thee shall fall away to thee. 
16 Behold! I create the smith that bloweth the coals in the fire ; 
And bringeth out the instrument for his work ; 
I also create the spoiler to destroy. 
17 No instrument formed against thee shall prosper ; 
And thou shalt condemn every tongue that riseth up in 


judgment with thee. 


This is the inheritance of the servants of Jehovah ; 
And their righteousness is from me, saith Jehovah. 


\ 


state. Comp. Rev. xxi. and xxii, in 
the latter of which chapters we have 
a sublime symbolical description, 
which may be regarded as an ampli- 
fication of verses 11 and 12. 

15. The meaning of this verse is, 
that whatever enemies might assault 
the church, they were not to be viewed 
as commissioned by God to execute 
wrath upon her, as the Assyrians and 
Babylonians had been, and conse- 
quently should not succeed in their 
attempts to remove her. At Ὃν" 7a 
subaud. Vs, the enemy. JI is not used 
here as an interjection, but as a con- 
ditional particle. Comp., for this 
usage, Exod. vili. 22; Job xl 23. 
‘MNd is a less usual, but by no means 
a recent form, of ‘7x2. The verb %3, 
followed by ἡ of the person, always 
signifies 10. go over to another party ; 


LXX. ἐπὶ σὲ καταφεύξονται ; Vulg. 


adjungetur titi. How often have the 


enemies of the saints been arrested in 
their hostility, by a conviction that 
they were fighting against God, laid 
down their arms, and joined themselves 
to those whom they persecuted ! 

16, 17. All creatures and instru- 
ments being subordinate to the super- 
intending agency of Divine providence, 
the church is assured, that nothing 
shall be permitted to transpire that 
can inflict any real injury upon her. 
Those who fabricate weapons, and 
those who employ them, are equally in 
the hand of God—the Maker of all. 

The chapter concludes with a decla- 
ration, that although such should be 
the happy state of the servants of the 
Lord, it was not to be the reward of 
any merit in them, but the result of 
his own free and undeserved favour. 
To him they are indebted, both for the 
righteousness of their character, and 
the vindication of their privileges. 


CHAPTER LV. 


This chapter treats of the spiritual blessings to be enjoyed by the church as 
restored from Babylon, and established under the reign of the Messiah. It 
commences with an universal invitation to those who are spiritually 
destitute to come and participate in the gratuitous provisions of the Gospel, 
and a powerful appeal respecting the fruitlessness of every attempt to obtain 
happiness from any other source, 1—3. The attention of mankind is then 


412 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. LY. 


directed to the mediatorial appointment of the Messiah, and the extension 
of his kingdom throughout the world, 4, 5. On this is based a series of 
calls to the unconverted Jews to avail themselves of the Gospel as first 
preached to them, with gracious assurances of pardon, 6—9. And after 
a beautiful illustration of the certainty of the Divine word’s taking effect, 
10, 11, the prophet returns to his captive people, and again predicts their 
joyful deliverance, and happy return to their own land. 


1 Ho! every one that thirsteth, come to the waters, 
And he that hath no money, come, procure and eat ; 
Yea, come, procure wine and milk, 

Without money and without price. 

2 Why do ye give your money for what is not bread? 
And your toil for that which satisfieth not ? 
Hearken attentively to me, and eat what is good, 
And your soul shall delight itself in fatness. 

3 Incline your ear, and come to me; 

Hear, that your soul may live ; 
And I will make an everlasting covenant with you, 


The sure mercies of David. 


1. The freeness, abundance, richness, 
the pure, refreshing, and satisfactory 
nature of gospel-blessings, are indi- 
cated by the metaphors here employed. 
Comp. chap. xii. 3, xxv. 6. The Targ. 
limits the tense to instruction ; but 
this is only the medium through which 
men are brought into the enjoyment of 
these blessings. ‘Mihi vero dubium 
non est quin Jesaias hisce nominibus 
Aquarum, Lactis, Vini, Panis, omnia 
comprehendat que δ spiritualem 
vitam necessaria sunt.” Calvin. 

2. WDD DW, lit. to weigh, weigh out 
money, in reference to the custom of 
weighing uncoined gold and silver 
in mercantile transactions, which an- 
ciently obtained, not only among the 
Hebrews, but among other nations ; 
and still obtains in Turkey, and other 
parts of the East. Hence the terms 
RD, shekel, ττῷ, Gerah, &e. 

3. The DY ma, which God promises 
to institute, is none other than the 
mom ma, so fully described, Jer. xxxi. 
31—34. Indeed, it is explained in 
the words immediately following, ‘107 


DONT NI, the sure benefits promised to 
David; Arab. ἄδοί ΑἹ dd Suclye, 


promissa Davidis veracia ; LXX. ra ὅσια 
Δαυὶδ ta πιστὰ, which the Apostle 
quotes, Acts xiii. 34, in order to shew 
that Christ must necessarily have 
risen to an immortal life. The phrase 
τὴ ΡΠ, LXX. rd ἐλέη Δαυΐδ, occurs 
again 2 Chron. vi. 42, as descriptive 
of the promise which God made to 
David of a Son who was to be raised 
up to him after his death, 1 Chron. 
xvii. 11 ; who was not only to be his 
descendant, but the descendant of his 
sons, ibid. ; and who was to reign over 
a kingdom that was to endure to 
perpetuity, vers. 12—14. Comp. Isa. 
ix. 7; Luke i. 32, 33. That this pro- 
mise, of which we have a full state- 
ment 2 Sam. vii. 12—16, and 1 Chron. 
xvii. 11—14, was altogether distinct 
from that which respected Solomon, 
1 Chron, xxii. 8—13, has been satis- 
factorily shewn by Whiston, Pierce, 
and Kennicott. It likewise forms the 
subject of Ps. Ixxxix.; the title of 


CHAP. LV.] 


ISAIAH. 


415 


4 Behold! I have made him a Witness fo the people. 
A Prince and Commander to the people. 

5 Behold! thou shalt call nations which ἕπου Enewest not, 
And nations which knew not thee shall rum ἔν thee ; : 


Because of Jehovah thy God, 


And because of the Holy One of Israel, who hath glonfied thee. 
6 Seek ye Jehovah while he may be found: 
Call ye upon him while he is near ; 


which ἘΞ ΘΝ GP Te Oy I will sng 
of the mercies of Jehorch for ever, ie 


sach, sure and permanent. 

4. As the promises are all Yea and 
Amen im the Meszah, he ἔξ here D 
troduced to view pers 


F 

i 

F 

ἢ, 

ἔ 

, 
“8 
A ἢ 5' 


we 


‘ 
Hl; 
i 


: 
; 
i 
ἢ, 
Ἵ 


> 
i 
: 
Aur 


NT ἐν Rev. ἢ 5; ἀρχεγὰς, Acts 
. T. ἄρχων, Rev. ὃς 

NL15 ; Heb ἢ τὸ. The difference 
im meaning between this 


the Tas TSS2, Cemmenier, seems 
to be, that by the former ᾿Ξ expressed 
the Mea of suime before, a5 ἃ primce 


ts. and Scholz, are of qpimen that 
Sie Clisech si Seok Meio 

is more natural ie refer the wank te 
der is used contrary te the mage of 


the when adtirexins the 
acta Οὐ τος Egan ai 
Messcks. Ghnm, SBS νὰ 


414 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. LY. 


7 Let the wicked forsake his way, 
And the unrighteous his thoughts ; 
And let him return to Jehovah, and he will be merciful to him ; 
Even to our God, for he will abundantly pardon. 
8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, 
Neither are your ways my ways, saith Jehovah. 
9 For as the heavens are high above the earth, 
So are my ways above your ways, 
And my thoughts above your thoughts. 


10 


For as the rain and the snow come down from heaven, 


And return not thither, but water the earth, 
And cause it to bring forth and bud, 
That it may give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater : 


ll 


So shall my word be, which goeth out of my mouth; 
It shall not return to me void, 


But shall effect that which I please, 
And prosper in that for which I send it. 


12 
And be led out in peace ; 


For ye shall go forth with joy, 


The mountains and hills shall burst into song before you, 
And all the trees of the field shall clap their hands. 
18 Instead of the thorn shall come up the cypress ; 


established among them, lest Jehovah 
should withdraw his presence from 
them and vouchsafe it to the Gentiles 
only. While the latter pressed for- 
ward with the utmost eagerness, it 
behoved the former to repent, believe 
the Gospel, and bring forth fruits 
worthy of repentance. See, for a 
similar argument, chap. 11. 2—5, 

8, 9. Though men would not so act 
towards each other, as it regards the 
forgiveness of numerous and _ highly 
aggravated offences, it was in perfect 
accordance with the exalted charac- 
ter of Jehovah, who “ delighteth in 
mercy.” Before the former 1723, the 
compound Ws, marking the protasis, 
is omitted. Job vii.9; Ps. xlviii. 6; 
Hos. xi. 2; furnish similar instances 
of this ellipsis. Comp. for the sen- 
timent, Ps. οἱ], 11. 

11. By some, 727 has here been 
taken in a personal sense, as desig- 
nating the Logos, of whom, according 


to such interpretation, Jehovah de- 
clares, that he should not return to 
heaven without accomplishing the 
work which he had given him to do ; 
but, as appears from the following 
verse, it is rather to be understood of 
the Divine mandate given to Cyrus 
to liberate the captive Jews. Though 
thus special, however, in the present 
connexion, the declaration holds true 
of the Divine word universally, Numb. 
xxiii. 19. 

12,13. The general meaning of these 
verses is well given by Musculus: 
* Quoniam, inquit, verbum hoe quod 
egressus est ex ore Dei, sic erit efficax 
suo tempore, ut sit vos ὃ Babylone 
liberaturum, et in hance terram ves- 
tram reducturum. Exibitis igitur ὃ 
Babylone liberati, cum gaudio, et 
deducimini cum pace: hoc est, pro- 
speré, sine hostili infestatione, et 
absque omni impedimento.” The 12th 
verse exhibits a noble instance of 


CHAP. 11. ISATAH. 


And instead of the nettle shall come up the myrtle ; 
And it shall become a name to Jehovah ; ' 
An everlasting sign that shall not be cut off. 


prosopopeeia; the most prominent 
objects in nature being represented as 
meeting the returning Jews with 
exultant joy, or joining in acclama- 
tions as they pass along. 


“ Tpsi leetitia voces ad sidera jactant, 

Intonsi montes: ips jam carmina 
rupes, 

Tpsa sonant arbusta.”—Virg. Eel. v. 


To indicate their prosperous and 
happy condition, nature is represented 
as undergoing a complete change. 


415 
Comp. chap. xli. 18, 19. ΕΘ is of 
doubtful signification: LXX., Aq., 


Theod., κονύζα, the inula viscosa ; 
Symm. xvidn, the common nettle. Thus 
also the Vulg.° wrtica, which I have 
followed, as the root is, not impro- 
bably, 772, 4o dura, with 72 appended, 
from 18, calamity ; Sanscrit, pid, to 
make sad, afflict. 

The event should redound to the 
glory of God, and be appealed to in 
all future time as a signal instance of 
his gracious interposition in behalf of 
his people. 


CHAPTER LVI. 


The first eight verses of this chapter are intimately connected with the 
subject of the preceding. The Jews are incited to cultivate those dispo- 
sitions, and to exhibit that conduct which corresponded to the nature of 
the dispensation about to be established, 1, 2; assurances and promises are 
given to those who had been excluded from the commonwealth of Israel, 
that they should be received to the full enjoyment of the richer privileges 
of the Christian Church, 3—7; and a specific prediction is inserted 
respecting the ingathering of the Gentiles generally, 8. 

With the 9th verse a new subject begins, which is continued through the 
three foll6wing chapters; vz. the character of the Jews and their rulers, 
which brought down upon them the retributions of Divine providence. 
The prophet had presented to his mental vision that character as developed 
from his own time till after the final dispersion of the Jews’ by the 
Romans. The different hostile powers by which they were to be oppressed 
are first summoned to attack them, 9; and then the description of 
character commences with a graphic picture of the ignorance, insensibility, 
avarice, and voluptuousness of their ecclesiastical and civil rulers, 10—12. 


1 Tus saith Jehovah : 


Observe justice ; yea, practise righteousness ; 


1, 2. The import of these verses is 


Comp. Ps. I. 23; Mal. iv. 4, 5. As 


essentially that of the message of during the exile, the Sabbath was the 


John the Baptist, Matt. iii, 2, 8. 


only part of the law which the Jews 


410 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. LVI. 


Hor the coming of my salvation is near, 
And the revelation of my righteousness. 
2 Blessed is the man that doeth this ; 
And the son of man that adhereth to it ; 
Keeping the sabbath, without profaning it ; 
And keeping his hand so as to do no evil. 
3 Nor let the stranger, that joineth himself to Jehovah, say, 
Jehovah hath utterly separated me from his people ; 


Neither let the eunuch say, 
Behold! 1 am a dry tree. 


4 lor thus saith Jehovah to the eunuchs that keep my sabbaths, 
And choose the things in which I delight, 


Adhering to my covenant : 


or 


I will give them in my house, and within my walls, 


A memorial and a name better than sons and daughters ; 


I will give to each an everlasting name, 


That shall not be cut off. 


had it in their power to keep, in so 
far as external observances were con- 
cerned, particular stress is laid upon 
its celebration; but with a directly 
implied reference to future times. It 
is also worthy of special notice, that 
the observance of the. day of rest is 
here placed on a level with the per- 
formance of moral duties :—a circum- 
stance which exactly tallies with the 
place assigned to it in the decalogue. 
msi and ΠΡ are anticipative of the 
duties afterwards mentioned in the 
verse, 

3. These two classes are selected to 
serve aS a specimen of the whole 
Gentile world. They had been ex- 
pressly ‘excluded from the congrega- 
tion of the Hebrews, Deut. xxiii. 1—8. 
And even such converts as were after- 
wards received by the Jews, under 
the designation of P1873, proselytes of 
righteousness, were never cordially re- 
garded by them, but, on the contrary, 
were held to be the canker and rust 
of Israel. Such distinctions were all 
to be done away. The phrase, “a 
dry tree,” is still used in the East of 
a person of either sex who has no 
children. 

4. The covenant referred to here 
an ver. 6, is doubtless the everlasting, 


or New Covenant, the establishment 
of which is promised, chap. lv. 3. 

5. 2, hand, is here used in the sense 
of monument or memorial; that by 
which the knowledge of the character 
or actions of any one is transmitted 
to future generations. The eunuchs 
might have nothing within the pre- 
cincts of the Jewish temple to per- 
petuate their memory: they night 
have no “name” on the genealogical 
tables of the Jews; but the want of 
these would be amply compensated, 
by the everlasting privileges which 
they should enjoy as sons and citizens 
in the New Jerusalem. Michaelis has 
here an ingenious reference to the 
Ethiopian eunuch, who is immor- 
talized by a monument and a name, 
Acts viii. far above any celebrity that 
could have accrued to him from sons 
and daughters. Gesenius, and some 
other expositors, prefer the accepta- 
tion portion, to that of monument, but 
Dw, zwme, being mentioned in imme- 
diate connexion with it, proves that 


-it means the latter, as that on which 


the name was inscribed. Comp. 1 
Sam. xv. 12; 2 Sam. viii. 13. 1 is to 
be taken collectively, as frequently 
after a plural. 


CHAP. LVI. | 


_ISATAH. 


417 


6 And as for the strangers that join themselves to Jehovah, 


to serve him, 


And to love the name of Jehovah, becoming his servants ; 
All that keep the sabbath, without profaning it, 


Adhering to my covenant: 


7 I will bring them to my holy mountain, 
And make them joyful in my house of prayer: 
Their burnt-offerings and their sacrifices shall be accepted on 


my altar; 


For my house shall be called a house of prayer for all people. 


8 The Lord Jehovah saith! 


He that collecteth the dispersed of Israel : 


Τ will collect to him others, 


In addition to those of his that are collected. 
9 All ye beasts of the field, come ; 
All ye beasts of the forest, come to devour! 
10 His watchmen are blind; they are all without knowledge ; 


7. The language of this verse is 
obviously metaphorical, since it de- 
seribes privileges to be enjoyed after 
Jerusalem, and the temple, with all 
its ritual observances, had been de- 
stroyed. It is borrowed from scenes 
and services familiar to the Jews in 
the days of the prophet, and onward 
during the continuance of their ancient 
dispensation. The quotation of part 
of the verse by our Lord, Mark xi. 17, 
in application to the literal temple, 
which was then standing, has the 
Same general aspect towards the Gen- 
tiles. Comp. Mal. i. 10, 11; Ps. li. 
U7Ge Rom, ΧΗ Ὁ Ὁ. 1) Tim, ii.'15;' Heb. 
xiii, 15; 1 Pet. ii. 5. sp, shall be 
called: i.e. shall be. 

8. Israel stands for the Church of 
God. Not only were the dispersed 
Jews to be collected, and prepared for 
the enjoyment of the privileges of the 
Gospel, but the Gentiles were likewise 
to be gathered, so as to form one body 
with such of the former as should be 
converted to the Messiah. The ante- 
cedent to YY and Y¥372 is NIM, Israel, 
the original stock, as the Apostle 
teaches, Rom. xi. 17, 18, into which 
the Gentile branches were grafted. 

9. Mention having been made of 


the dispersion of the Jews, the pro- 
phet, by a bold apostrophe, abruptly 


-summons to the execution of their 


work, the agents by whom it was to 
be effected. These he characterises 
as wild beasts,—a metaphor not un- 
usual in the prophetic writings, when 
reference is made to persecuting 
powers. See Jer. xii. 9; Ezek, xxxiv. 
28; Dan. vii. 3, 19, 23; Rev. xiii. 1. 
yoy has Wa 11743, as well as ‘Tw imn %, 
for its object: to express which I have 
repeated the corresponding English 
verb. The interpretation of some of 
the Rabbins, Rosenmiller, and others, 
that the wild beasts are called to 
devour one another, cannot be jus- 
tified from the connexion. Lowth’s 
objection to the 3 in 12 is also ground- 
less. See on chap. xxi. 13. 

10. The exposure of the Jews to 
the inflictions of Divine indignation 
is in this and the two following 
verses ascribed to the impiety of 
their teachers as its primary ¢ause. 
They were not only neglected by 
them, but deceived by their erro- 
neous doctrines, and corrupted by 
their bad example. Most commen- 
tators consider both civil and eccle- 
siastical rulers to be meant by the 


418 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. LVI. 


They are all dumb dogs; they cannot bark ; 
Dreamers; lying down; loving to slumber. 


11 


Yea, the dogs are greedy; they cannot have enough ; 


And the shepherds themselves cannot understand : 
They all turn to their own way ; 
Each for his gain from his quarter. 


12 Come, I will fetch wine, 


And let us drink ourselves drunk with strong liquor ; 
For to-morrow shall be as this day ; 


Yea, vastly superior. 


op’, watchmen ; but I do not find the 
term ever applied figuratively to any 
but prophets, or religious teachers. 
Those here introduced were destitute 
of spiritual perception,—consequently, 
could not see the impending danger, 
and give warning of it. Comp. Matt. 
xv. 14; xxiii. 16, 17, 19, 24, 26. The 
idea of dumb dogs was naturally sug- 
gested by that of watchmen who 
gave no warning. 123, fo bark, occurs 
only here, but is common in the 
Arabic, and in the Rabbinical He- 
brew. O17 is likewise a ἅπαξ dey. Five 
MSS., originally three more, and per- 
haps three others, four Edd., Symm., 
and the Vulg., read ὉΠ, seers ; but 
this would break in upon the meta- 
phorical character of the passage. 
The rendering of the LXX. ἐνυπνιαζό- 
μενοι, and of Aq. φανταζόμενοι, dreamers, 
delirantes, is fully supported by the 


cognate Arab. Six, om, derilavit 
in loquendo ; use , deliratio, whether 


from sleep, or disease ; and, the refer- 
ence to dogs being continued, the 
term aptly describes the dreams to 
which these animals are subject, 
under the influence of which they 
give utterance to a subdued bark or 


growl, 023% conveys not merely the 
idea of lying down, but of continuing 
to lie, a8 in sleep. 

11. wea, lit. strong of soul; i.e. of 
a powerful appetite, greedy. The 
metaphor expresses the avaricious 
character of the Jewish teachers. 
By the shepherds are meant the kings 
and princes of the nation, who, 
equally with the false prophets, were 
destitute of spiritual discernment, and 
addicted to selfishness and sensual in- 
dulgence, ὙΠΕΡ, lit. from his extremity, 
which expresses the extreme lengths 
to which they went, in their efforts to 
accumulate gain. 

12. Isaiah ironically introduces 
these abandoned princes as inviting 
their companions to join them in in- 
temperance. 7x, with which the 
invitation commences, is the identical 
term used ver. 9, where the wild 
beasts are summoned to come and 
inflict punishment upon them. Each 
of them is represented as giving such 
invitation, the propriety of which not 
having been perceived by some in- 
terpreters, they have changed the 
singular 7778 into the plural 772, we 
will fetch. The language here em- 
ployed strikingly depicts the feelings 
of the voluptuous in every age. 


CHAP. 1.011.] ISAIAH. 419 


CHAPTER ΤΥ}. 


The prophet now proceeds to describe the national character of the Jews in 
his own day, and down to the time of the captivity. Unaffected by the 
removal of the pious, which is always an ominous circumstance in the 
history of a nation, 1, 2, they evinced an awful hardihood in mocking God, 
3, 4; abandoned themselves to the grossest idolatries, 5—8 ; and left no 
methods untried by which to gratify their apostate disposition, 9, 10. 
Jehovah expostulates with them on the folly of their conduct, and the 
inutility of their self-righteous confidence, 11, 12 ; promises deliverance to 
the penitent, 13—18; announces the Gospel of peace to be preached to 
Jews and Gentiles at a period subsequent to the return from Babylon, 
19; and threatens obstinate transgressors with the deprivation of every 


blessing, 20, 21, 


1 THE righteous perisheth, and no man layeth it to heart; 
And good men are taken away, while none considereth it ; 
But it is from calamity the righteous is taken away : 

2 He entereth into peace; they rest on their beds : 

Every one that walketh straight before him. 

3 But as for you,—draw nigh, ye sons of the sorceress! 

Ye brood of the adulterer, and the whore! 


1. Whether Hezekiah or Josiah be 
meant by 7127 cannot be determined, 
nor, indeed, whether any particular 
individual be intended; but both of 
these excellent princes were removed 
before they were advanced in life, 
and were thus relieved from the pains 
of witnessing the calamities which 
the wicked kings by whom they were 
succeeded brought upon the nation. 
nods, which properly signifies ¢o gather, 
is frequently used in Niphal, of being 
removed from the present state into 
that of the pious dead, to be re-united 
to them as still living with God, Luke 
xx. 38. Comp. Gen. xxv. 8, xlix. 29. 

2. The elliptical phrase ἵν Nia 
means to enter into the peaceable 
state of the departed, where they are 
free from all the sufferings and dis- 
quietudes of life. It is used of the 


spirit only: the rest of the body in 
the grave is expressed in the following 
clause. 473} 727 is descriptive,—not 
of a walk or conversation in the 
invisible world, but of the character 
of the blessed dead while they lived 
in the present. Theirs was a straight- 
forward, undeviating course. 

3,4. There is great force in Dns), 
with which this address commences ; 
as there is, likewise, an emphasis in 
the repetition of the same pronoun 
towards the close of the next verse. It 
places the wicked Jews in the boldest 
contrast with the pious departed. 
They are called to come forward and 
answer for the daring profligacy of 
their conduct ; and are addressed in 
terms of correspending opprobrium 
and reproach, 3:7 is here used sub- 
stantively, instead of 734, but is pro- 


420 


ISATAH 


[CHAP. LVIT. 


4 At whom is it ye indulge in sport? 
At whom is it ye gape with the mouth, ye stretch out the 


tongue ? 


Are ye not rebellious children ? a treacherous brood ? 


or 


Enflamed with gods under every green tree, 


Slaying the children in the valleys, 


Under the cliffs of the rocks. 


6 The smooth stones of the valley are thy portion ; 


They, they are thy lot ; 


Yea, to them thou hast poured out a libation, 


And presented an offering. 


Should I not take vengeance on account of these things ? 


perly the third sing. fem. of the fut. 
in Kal, from 72, ¢o commit whoredom or 
idolatry. 82 TW, to make a _ long 
tongue, i.e. to stretch it out of the 
mouth, in contempt of any one, was 
not peculiar to the Hebrews. Livy, 
describing the meeting of T. Manlius 
and his Gallic foe, says: “Armatum 
adornatumque adversus Gallum stolide 
letum, et (quoniam id quoque me- 
moria dignum antiquis visum est) 
linguam etiam ab irrisu exserentem pro- 
ducunt.” Hist. vii. 10. 

5. Here commences a fearful picture 
of the idolatrous practices in which 
the Jews indulged. 0973, the Niph. 
part. of oan, 40 burn, be inflamed with 
lust. Comp. 082, from 7x, Mal. 111. 9 ; 
nimi, Jer. xxii. 23; and see Ewald, καὶ 
262. Orig. Gesen. Lehrg. Ὁ. 371. It 
is followed by 2 to mark the im- 
passioned devotedness with which 
the Jews engaged in the service of 
idols. By 0 x, gods or idols, not oaks 
are meant, as the words immediately 
following shew. Thus the LXX,, 
Vulg., Targ., Syr. The barbarous 
custom of immolating children in 
honour of, or with a view to pro- 
pitiate, the gods, was awfully pre- 
valent among the Pagan nations of 
antiquity. Its existence among the 
Pheenicians is mentioned by Eusebius, 
Prep. Evan. iv. 16; Curtius, iv. 2, 23 ; 
Porphyr. de Abstin. ii. 56 ; among the 
Carthaginians, by Justin. xix. 1, and 
Varro, in Augustine’s Civ. Dei, vii. 
19; and among the Cretans, by 
Porphyr. wt sup. In Hebrew, it is 


expressed by x2 O22 Yn, to offer 
children, by causing them to pass into 
the fire. Some, indeed, after the 
Rabbins, have attempted to soften 
the description, by representing the 
action as consisting merely of a lus- 
tration, in performing which upon 
the children, they passed through 
uninjured ; but that they were really 
burned, such passages as Ps. cvi. 37, 
38; Jer. vil. 31, xix. 5, indisputably 
prove. Diod. Sic., describing the rite 
as celebrated by the Carthaginians to 
Cronos or Saturn, says: ἦν παρ᾽ αὐτοῖς 
ἀνδριὰς Κρόνου χαλκοῦς, ἐκτετακὼς Tas 
χεῖρας ὑπτίας ἐγκεκλιμένας ἐπὶ τὴν γῆν, 
ὥστε τὸν ἐπιτεθέντα τῶν παίδων ἀποκυ- 
λίεσθαι καὶ πίπτειν εἴς τι χάσμα πλῆρες 
πυρός, Xx. 14. See Calmet and Winer, 
art. “Moloch.” In the O. T. this 
worship is specially spoken of in 
reference to Moloch, the god of the 
Ammonites. It was practised by the 
Jews in the valley of Hinnom, 2 
Chron. xxviii. 3, xxxili. 6; and, as 
would appear from the present text, 
in other valleys. 

6. The Jews are addressed collec- 
tively in the fem. gen.—most probably 
to point out the fact of their sustain- 
ing the character of the 717, specified 
v. 3. In Jr PTA is an elegant 
paronomasia. That the 3 in 7127773 
is the Beth essentie (see on chap. XxXvi. 
4), the following ἘΠῚ 077 seem clearly to 
indicate. What we are to understand 
by opt has been disputed. The 
ancient versions give it by portion. 
Hitzig and Scholz, naked, unshaded 


CHAP. LVII.] 


ISATAH. 


421 


7 On the high and lofty mountain thou hast placed thy bed ; 
Yea, thou hast gone up thither to offer sacrifice. 


places, without any appropriate mean- 
ing. Gesenius, who had broached this 
rendering i in his Comm., has returned 
to that of portion in his Thesaurus, 


sub voc. The root px, Arab. eS, 


levigavit, quantitate et mensura definivit, 
signifies fo de smooth; and as smooth 
stones were used as lots, 727 in Chald. 


and gsi in Arab. denote a stone 


employed for this purpose. The 
phrase, 72772 O28 ‘227, smooth stones 
Jrom the valley, 1 ‘Sam. xvii. 40, is the 
full form of what is here only ‘ellipti- 
cally expressed. Since these stones are 
here represented as being objects of 
idolatrous worship, (722 ποθ Di7D3,) 
there can be little ἫΝ that they 
were such as had been smoothed and 
formed into particular shapes by the 
violent action of the water in the 
wady upon them ; and so rendered fit 
to be selected to serve as idols. Of 
their size nothing is said. They are 
supposed to have been the’ λίθοι 
Aurapol, anointed stones, which were 
consecrated to the honour of certain 
deities, and were believed to be in- 
stinct with their presence. They were 
also called βαιτύλια ; and traceable, it 
has been thought, to the transaction 
at Bethel, where Jacob erected his 
commemorative pillar, poured oil upon 
it, and constituted it a place of Divine 
worship. Lucian thus describes an 
idolater, in reference to the super- 
stitious veneration paid to such stones: 
Pate ais ἀνὴρ τὰ μὲν ἄλλα καλὸς καὶ 
ἀγαθὸς .... τὰ δὲ περὶ τοὺς θεοῦς πάνυ 
νοσῶν, καὶ ἀλλόκοτα περὶ αὐτῶν πεπι- 
στευκὼς, καὶ εἰ μόνον ἀληλιμμένον ποῦ 
λίθον, ἢ ἢ ἔστεφανωμένον θεάσαιτο, προσ- 
πίπτων ἀεὶ καὶ προσκυνῶν, καὶ ἐπὶ 
πολὺ παρεστὼς, καὶ εὐχόμενος, καὶ τἀγαθὰ 
παρ᾽ αὐτοῦ αἰτῶν. Pseudomantis, c. 
xxx. Arnobius also, speaking of ‘his 
conduct when a Pagan, says: “Si 
quando conspexeram lubricatum lapi- 
dem et ex olivi unguine sordidatum, 
tanquam inesset vis presens, adulabar, 
affabar et beneficia poscebam nihil 


sentiente trunco.” Adver. Gent. i. p. 
13. Comp. also: Πάντα λίθον, τὸ δὴ 
λεγόμενον, λιπαρὸν ἐπροσκυνοῦν. Clem. 
Alex. Strom. vii. Of this ancient 
superstition, the celebrated Black 


Stone (Ogud] = 1) in the angle of 


the Caaba at Mecca, is, in all proba- 
bility, a relic. “It is,’ says Burck- 
hardt, “an irregular oval, about seven 
inches in diameter, with an undulated 
surface, composed of about a dozen 
smaller stones of different sizes and 
shapes, well joined together with a 
small quantity of cement, and per- 
fectly smoothed.—It is very difficult 
to determine accurately the quality 
of this stone, which has been 
worn to its present surface by the 
millions of touches and kisses it 
has received.” Travels in Arabia, 
i. pp. 249, 250. 

Such idols were the 720, portion, and 
303, Jot, of the apostate Jews, because 
they regarded them as the authors of 
their prosperity, possessions, and en- 
joyments. The words are used pre- 
cisely in the same sense in which 
Jehovah is said to be the 727 of his 
people, Ps. Ixxiii. 26, cxix. 57. exlii. 6 ; 
Jer. x. 16; Lam. iii. 24. He is to 
them the source of infinite good. See 
especially the passage just quoted 
from Jeremiah, in which Jehovah, as 
“the portion of Jacob,” is contrasted 
with the objects of heathen confidence 
and worship.—There is considerable 
emphasis in the repetition 07 07, as 
well as in 53 before 079. “Non sim- 
pliciter dicit, Fundis ipsis libamen : 
sed etiam ipsis; g. d. non mihi soli 
sed ipsis quoque fundis,” &c. Mus- 
culus. Jin YT is equivalent to N77; 
at least, an affirmative answer is im- 
plied in interrogations thus put. So 
the LXX. and Vulg. 

7. The metaphor here employed is 
taken from the conduct of astrumpet, 
entirely destitute of shame. Comp. 
Jer. iii. 2; Ezek. xvi. 24, 25, 31. Wis 
used collectively for mountains or 
hills. 


an 


422 


ἸΞΑΤΙΑΗ͂. 


[CHAP. -LVII. 


8 Behind the door also, and the door-post, thou hast placed thy 


memorial ; 


For thou hast exposed thyself to another than me ; 

Yea, thou hast gone up; thou hast enlarged thy bed ; 

And thou hast obtained a contract from them ; 

Thou hast loved their converse ; thou hast chosen the place. 
9 Yea, thou hast travelled to the king with ointment, 


And multiplied thy perfumes ; 


Yea, thou hast sent thy messengers to a distance, 


And gone down even to Sheol. 
Thou hast been fatigued with the length of thy journey : 


10 


Yet thou hast not said, It is desperate : 
Thou hast found the vigour of thy hand ; 


8. An amplified description of 
idolatrous lewdness in reference to 
household gods, and the worship paid 
to them in secret.—j}n3, remembrance, 

. memorial, that which brings to re- 
membrance ; here, images or represen- 
tations of celebrated idols. Comp. 
Ezek. xvi. 19, xxiii. 14—16.— nxn, lit. 
From with me; 1. 6. in a state of sepa- 
ration or apostasy from me. Comp. 
mm “me 3, Hos, 1. 2; nD, iv. 12; 
and ὅν, ix. 1, in the same sense.— 
DM NM; supply ΓΞ, a covenant ; 
here used for the terms of a contract. 
The reference is to the advantages 
which the Jews expected from the 
service of idols, which are represented 
as the hire obtained by a harlot from 
her lovers. The representation, Ezek. 
Xvi. 33, 34, is of a still more aggravated 
description. 3M is an incorrect form 
for ™2n. For a similar instance, see 
Jer. 11]. 5.—m17 2, Déderlein, Gesenius 
in Comm., and Hitzig, take to be an 
euphemism ; but, in his later Lexicons, 
Gesenius has returned to the signi- 
fication, place. That 717 signifies fo 
look out, select, choose, see Exod, xviii. 
21. Thus the Targ. and Syr. 

9. 1 usually signifies Zo view, look 
round, watch for, but here it obviously 
appears to be used in the acceptation 
of going or travelling. Comp. 1A, to go 


about, and the Arab. ye », ter fecit ; 
ww, profectio, tter ; Jb circumivit. 


Lean aatle here means the king of 
Assyria, Egypt, or some other foreign 
country; or, whether it stands for 
920, Molech, and should be so pointed, 
is uncertain. We find the word 
in the compound name of idols, as 
yO, Adrammelech, and 37232, Anam- 
melech, gods of the Sepharvaim, 2 
Kings xvii. 31; and, from the con- | 
nexion, it is probable that either 
Molech, or some other idol, is in-| 
tended. Comp. Amos v. 26; Zeph. 
i. 5. The Jews are represented as 
a courtesan who uses precious oils 
and perfumes, in order to set off her 
person, and ingratiate herself with her 
paramours. To such idols as were 
within reach they went in person ; 
and to such as were celebrated in dis- 
tant countries, they sent messengers 
with offerings. *xw1v, unto Sheol, 
means, 7 the lowest degree. See Deut. 
Xxxil. 22, as ἕως adov, Matt. xi. 23; 
Luke. x. 15. The idolatry was of the 
most degrading description. 

10. That 77725 means length of way, 
see Josh. ix. 13. For Ν᾽), comp. Jer. 
li. 25, xviii. 12.—77. 7 has been va- 
riously interpreted. The literal ren- 
dering, the life, i.e. vigour, strength, 
of thy hand, farnishes the mogt appro- 
priate meaning. The hand being the 
symbol of power, and ™ being used 
of whatever is lively or strong, the 
idea of natural vigour is intended to 
be conveyed. The idolatrous Jews 
wearied themselves with their un- 


CHAP. LVII.] 


ISATAH. 


423 


Therefore, thou hast not been discouraged. 


il 


Who filled thee with dread? or, of whom wast thou afraid, 


When thou provedst false, and didst not remember me, 


Nor lay it to heart ? 


Was 1 not silent, and hid mine eyes ὃ 


Yet thou fearedst me not. 
12 


18 
thee! 


I will shew thy righteousness, 
For they shall not profit thee. 
When thou criest out, let the collection of thy gods deliver 


and thy works ; 


Surely, the wind shall carry them all off; a puff shall take 


them away ; 


But he that trusteth in me shall possess the land, 
And inherit my holy mountain. 


hallowed practices ; but finding that 
they had not entirely exhausted their 
strength, they would not give up 
their pursuits as hopeless, but rather 
emboldened themselves in wicked- 
ness. 

11. An inquiry is here put to the 
infatuated Jews ; which of the idols to 
which they had applied, could they 
regard as more powerful than Je- 
hovah ? Because he had forborne to 
punish, they indulged in practices 
which argued the absence of all true 
regard to his authority. oz», the 
reading of the Textus .Receptus, is 
justly suspected. Very many MSS., 
among which the oldest ‘and _ best 
Spanish, and some printed Editions, 
as the Biblia Antiqua in fol., without 
date, the Complutensian, and that of 
Norzius of 1742, read 05ym, which, if 
pointed om, with yy understood, 
furnishes the sense found in the LXX. 
and Vulg. mapopé ; quasi non videns. 
For a similar ellipsis of Dry, see Ps. 
x. 1, This reading also well agrees 
with the context; so that, in con- 
sideration of the whole, I have been 
induced, with Lowth and Michaelis, 
to depart from the punctuation of the 
current text, 

12. The reading ὭΣ, of which also 
Lowth approves, is not by any means 
so well supported, and has, in all 
probability, originated in a desire to 
remove the apparent incongruity of 


supposing that any thing bearing the 
character of righteousness could be 
ascribed to the persons here addressed. 
But even in the most idolatrous times 
of the Jewish state, the temple-wor- 
ship was not entirely abandoned. Of 
this the Jews boasted, while they 
joined to it the worship of other gods, 
whom they were anxious to propitiate, 
in order to prevent attacks on the 
part of those nations of whom these 
idols were regarded as the patrons. 
Comp. Jer. vii. passim. This exegesis is 
preferable to that of Zwinglius, who 
considers the words to be spoken kar’ 
εἰρωνείαν sive ἀντίφρασιν. In Pwd 
the idea of wicked is implied ; hence 
the rendering of the LXX. τὰ κακά 
cov. It would be made apparent that 
neither a hypocritical service of the 
true God, nor the worship of strange 
gods, could be of any avail in the 
hour of danger. 

13. By ov13a7 are meant the idols 
and images of the entire Pantheon 
of the apostate Jews. Thus Jarchi, 
nap Wr D>) ODOR msiap; and Ge- 
senius, “ deine Haufen, gleichs. deine 
Schaaren, Legionen von Gottern, dein 
ganzes Pantheon.” To these they should 
look in vain for deliverance. 

The prophet now, by way of an- 
tithesis, administers comfort to the 
pious who should be involved in the 
national calamity ; and promises them 
a return to their own land. The lan- 


424 


14 


10 


ISATAH. [CHAP. LVII. 


And it shall be said: Cast up, cast up; prepare the way ; 
Remove the stumbling-block out of the way of my people. 
For thus saith the high and lofty One, 

That dwelleth in eternity, whose name is holy: 

I dwell in the high and holy place, 

But also in him that is contrite and of a lowly spirit ; 

To revive the spirit of the lowly, 

And to revive the heart of the contrite. 

For I will not always contend, 

Neither will I be angry for ever: 


Since the spirit would wear out before me, 
And the souls which I have made. 


17 


For his exorbitant iniquity I was angry, and smote him ; 
I hid my face, and was angry, 


Because he was contumacious in the way of his heart. 


18 


I have seen his ways, and 1 will heal him ; 


Τ will also comfort him, and restore consolations to him, 


And to his mourners ; 


Creating the fruit of the lips— 


Peace, peace to him that is far off, 


guage employed in this and the fol- 
lowing verse is almost identical with 
that elsewhere employed in reference 
to the same subject. 

14, 128 is here used impersonally. 

15, 16. These verses contain the 
most sublime description of the 
Divine majesty and condescension to 
be found in the Scriptures. The 
words require no comment; but they 
have a depth of meaning which no 
finite mind can fully comprehend. 
Comp. Ps. cxxxviii. 6 ; Isa. lxvi. 1, 2. 
ΤΟΣ and mm are here identical in 
meaning, 723) standing elsewhere for 
wb), 

17. iyza PY, lit. the iniquity of his gain ; 
but as the Hebrews were accustomed 
to connect the idea of exorbitant and 
oppressive means with that of lucre, 
they, naturally came to give to »z3 the 
signification of what was in a high 
degree, or flagrantly, unjust. Hence 
the combination yzirza denotes a 
rapacious person, one who breaks 
through all bounds in order to acquire 


gain. Arab, oak secuit, amputavit ; 


X. mercaturam fecit. Comp. Eph. v. 5, 
πλεονέκτης Os ἐστιν εἰδωλολάτρης. The 
pronominal masculine affix in ᾿θ 53 has 
for its antecedent Oy, ver. 14, which 
accounts for the use of this gender in 
this and the following verse. HOT is 
the historical infinitive ; 22 being un- 
derstood. The ) in 72) is causal. 

18. It is here implied that such 
were the destructive courses pursued 
by the Jews, that they were irreco- 
verable by any merely human means. 
Jehovah, therefore, graciously declares 
that he will reclaim them, remove 
their punishment, and restore comfort 
to them. The distinction between 
“him” and “ his mourners ” seems to 
be, that by the latter are meant such 
of the heathen as had become prose- 
lytes to the faith of the Jews, and, 
from sympathy, bewailed their cap- 
tivity in Babylon. 

19. By mney 13, fruit of the lips, is 
meant the following announcement, 
Peace, Peace. It denotes the proclama- 
tion of reconciliation in the Gospel, 
which is vindicated to God as its 
author, Comp. καρπὸν χειλέων, Heb, 


CHAP. LVIII. | 


ISAIAH. 


425 


And to him that is near, saith Jehovah ; 


And I will heal him. 


20 But as for the wicked, they are each tossed about like the sea, 


Which cannot rest ; 


And whose waters cast up mire and mud. 
21 There is no peace, saith my God, to the wicked. 


xiii. 15, where, however, the subject of 
reference is praise. The repetition, 
DW DIY, is expressive of the highest, 
or most complete, peace. The appro- 
priated use of p77 and 397, to designate 
the Gentiles along with the Jews, 
shews that the prophet had that 
period in view when both should be 
upon an equality in regard to privi- 
leges. Comp. Zech. ix. 10; Acts x. 
36; Eph. ii. 17. 

20, 21. The character and unhappy 


condition of such as reject the mes- 
sage of peace, and persevere in a 
course of rebellion, are here distinctly 
pointed out. Twenty-two MSS. read 
mm instead of wx, while three others, 
with the Alex. copy of the LXX. and 
the Arabic, combine both; but this 
diversity has doubtless arisen from 
the influence of chap. xlviii. 22, where 
the same declaration is made, and 
where all the MSS. exhibit 77, The 
Hexap. Syr. has simply jn τ 


CHAPTER LVIII. 


Having in the preceding chapter depicted the character of his countrymen, in 
the times immediately preceding the captivity, he now sets forth their cha- 
racter as exhibited towards its close, and from the period of that calamity, 
till the time of our Lord, Though recovered from idolatry, and professing 
great zeal for the worship of the true God, their religion was, in a great 
measure, confined to external forms and services, which were made a cloak 


for their wickedness. 


We learn from Zech. vii. viii., that the subject of 


fasts greatly occupied their attention after the return ; and the fact that 
the sect of the Pharisees sprang up in the course of a short time, in whose 
character the union of religious pretension with covert depravity was noto- 
rious, leaves no room to doubt that the portraiture here given was chiefly 
intended for them. It must, indeed, be familiar to every one who has perused 


the gospels. 


In this chapter, the prophet receives a commission to announce to the Jews 
the guilt which they still contracted, notwithstanding the flaming character 
of their religious profession, 1, 2; he specifies the worthlessness of their 
fasts, 3—5; points out the nature of acceptable fasting, 6, 7 ; promises 
prosperity and happiness to such as sincerely engaged in the service of God, 
8—12; and concludes with a particular recognition of the sanctity of the 
Sabbath, and a special promise to those who should hallow it, 13, 14. 


420 


ISATAH. [CHAP. LVIII. 


Cry aloud, restrain not ; 

Raise thy voice like a trumpet ; 

And declare to my people their rebellion, 

And to the house of Jacob their sins. 

They seek me, indeed, every day, 

And delight to know my ways ; 

Like a nation that doeth righteousness, 

And forsaketh not the ordinance of its God ; 

They inquire of me respecting righteous ordinances ; 
They delight in approaching to God. 

Why [say they] do we fast, and thou regardest not ? 
Do we humble ourselves, and thou takest no notice ? 


Behold! on your fast-day ye attend to business, 


And exact all your tasks. 


4 Behold! it is for strife and contention ye fast, 
And to smite with the fist of injustice ; 
Ye should not fast as ye do this day, 
Causing your voice to be heard on high. 
5 Is this the fast which I approve— 
The day for a man to humble himself? 


1. The loudness of the proclamation 
indicates the enormity of the evil. ΝῊ 
Waa, lit. ery through or with the throat, 
1. 6. with a full voice proceeding from 
the lungs, as distinguished from that 
which comes merely from the lips and 
tongue. 

2. The persons spoken of discovered 
much outward zeal and punctuality in 
attending to the ceremonies of reli- 
gion, and took a certain kind of de- 
light in going the round of duty, 
from the self-righteous persuasion 
that thereby they merited the Divine 
favour. ΚῚΣ ΒΦ and OY np, Gese- 
nius interprets of judgments of righ- 
teousness executed upon the enemy, 
and the approach of God to execute 
these judgments. The context, how- 
ever, requires us to understand them 
of religious ordinances, and direct 
acts of religious worship. Comp., for 
the latter phrase, Ps. lxxiii. 28. 

3. Notwithstanding the rigidity of 
their fasts, they felt a lurking convic- 
tion that they did not enjoy the 
favour of God. That yon signifies 


business, and not pleasure, in this place, 
the use of 12%, /abowr, in the corres- 
ponding member of the parallelism, 
sufficiently shews. The latter word 
the LXX. understand of servants: 
kal πάντας τοὺς ὑποχειρίους ὑμῶν ὑπο- 
vuooere ; but such a signification is 
not justified from usage. The mean- 
ing doubtless is, that though the pha- 
risaical Jews would not themselves 
engage in manual labour, they did not 
scruple to make the most rigorous 
demands on the time and strength of 
those whom they employed, requiring 
the full amount of their daily task. 

4. An amplification of the descrip- 
tion just given. Whether causing the 
voice to be heard on high be meant 
to convey the idea of the loud clamour 
of debate, or the elevation of the 
voice in public prayers, may seem 
doubtful. The former construction is 
the better sustained by the immediate 
context, 

5. 13, which properly signifies fo ¢ry, 
examine, prove, 18 evidently employed 
here in the sense of approving what is 


CHAP. LVIII. | 


ISATAH. 427 


Ts it to hang down his head like a bulrush ? 
To make sackcloth and ashes his couch ? 


Wilt thou call this a fast, 


And a day aeceptable to Jehovah ? 
6 Is not this the fast which I approve :— 
To loosen the fetters of injustice ; 
To untie the cords of the yoke ; 
And to set the oppressed at liberty ; 
And to burst asunder every yoke ? 
7 Is it not to break thy bread to the hungry; 
And to bring the persecuted poor into thy house’; 
When thou seest the naked, to clothe him ; 
‘And not to hide thyself from thine own flesh ? 
8 Then should thy light break forth as the morning, 
And thy welfare spring up quickly ; 
Thy righteousness also should go before thee, 
And the glory of Jehovah should be thy rearward. 
9 Then thou shouldst call, and Jehovah would answer ; 


found to be good. 83 niiy, to humble 
the soul, or oneself, is parallel with dix, 
fast, and the second member of the he- 
mistich merely expresses in different 
phraseology what is expressed in the 
first. It is the identical phrase em- 
ployed to describe the fasting to be 
observed on the great day of atone- 
ment, Lev. xvi. 29, 31; xxiii. 27, 32. 
Want of attention to these circum- 
stances led me, in the former edition 
of this work, to refer it to the third 
line of the verse, which, however, 
forms the first of another parallelism. 
ΕΣ is obviously used, as frequently, 
with the force of a reflexive pronoun. 


za from yy, Arab. rey to strew or 


place as a bed, prepare a place to lie 
in. The language describes the coarsest 
accommodation, such as that men- 
tioned by Wellsted, when he was 
under the necessity of making his 
bed in the ground, by digging out a 
sufficient portion of the dust or sand, 
and covering himself with whatever 
he had at hand. Travels in Arabia, 
vol. ii. p. 30. 

6, 7. Jehovah now describes the 
nature of the fast of which he ap- 
proves, in language appropriate to 


the circumstances of the religionists 
to whom special reference is here 
made. Comp. Jer. xxxiv. 8—18. 
Hospitality is a virtue which has 
always held the very first rank among 
the Oriental nations ; and any symp- 
tom of indisposition to exercise it, 
has ever met with execration. See 
Gen. xviii. 1—8, xix. 1, 2; Job xxxi. 
16—21; Matt. xxv. 35, 36. For on) Dw, 
comp. Ψψωμίζειν, 1 Cor. xiii. 3, and 
Bloomfield’s Note. oma, lit. persecu- 
tions, for DN "O28, men of persecutions, 
1. 6. the persecuted; from the Eth. 


CRE: persequi: TAQ BR: per- 
secutionem passus est. The LXX. ren- 
der ἄστεγοι, the houseless. By 713, thy 
own flesh, is meant kindred, or relatives, 
especially such as were more imme- 
diately connected. It not unfrequently 
happens, that persons whose minds 
are influenced by false notions of reli- 
gion, disregard family and relative 
claims. See Matt. xv. 5, 6. 

8. A beautiful figurative representa- 
tion of a state of prosperity, with re- 
ference to Jehovah as its author. 

9—12, These verses contain a con- 
tinuation of promises made to such 
as should serve God with acceptance, 


428 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. LVIII. 


Thou shouldst cry, and he would say, Behold me! 
If thou remove from the midst of thee the yoke, 
The pointing with the finger, and wicked discourse ; 


10 


And cause thy desire to go forth to the hungry, 


And satisfy the desire of the oppressed ; 
Then should thy light arise in darkness, 
And thy obscurity should be as noon. 


11 


Then Jehovah would lead thee continually, 


And satisfy thee in extreme drought ; 

He also would strengthen thy bones ; 

And thou shouldst be like a well-watered garden, 
And like a fountain whose water faileth not. 


12 


Yea, those that belong to thee should rebuild the ancient ruins ; 


Thou shouldst restore the foundations of successive gene- 


rations: 


And thou shouldst be called, The Repairer of the breach ; 
The Restorer of paths for the inhabitants. 


and a further amplification of particu- 
lars by which their religion was to be 
characterised. The 228 728 refers to 
the holding out of the middle finger 
in contempt of any person, on which 
account it was called by the ancients 
infamis digitus, Pers. 11. 33. Gesen. 
compares Martial, 11. 28, 2: 


“ Rideto multo 
. et digitum porrigito medium ;” 


and Plaut. Pseudol. iv. 7,45 : “intende 
digitum in hunc;” and aptly remarks, 


that the denominative Arab. verb we 


signifies, intendit digitum in aliquem vitu- 
perii ergo.—In 5) PPT is no difficulty, 
requiring the substitution of 07), 
which Lowth adopts. It is expres- 
sive of a strong feeling of desire to- 
wards the indigent, the contrary of 
which we have in the κλείειν τὰ 
σπλάγχνα ἀπὸ τινὸς, 1 John iii. 17. 
Others think, that by 22 is here 
meant the object of desire, of appetite, 
or the like; and that the duty enjoined 
is, that the person who fasts is to give 
to the poor what might have afforded 
gratification to himself. For ΓΊΠΕΠΣ, 


11, comp. the Arab. ci: 


ver. 


pauca, minimeque profunda aqua; ee 


sol, campus patens soli expositus ; hence 
ὑπ}: shining, dry, and the like. The 
reduplicate form is, as usual, inten- 
sive. The images here employed are 
peculiarly forcible in Eastern coun- 
tries, where there is frequently a 
great paucity of water, and where, in 
consequence, a perennial spring is 
of immense value.—n2X), for dwelling, 
is put for NI 2x2, or λυ, for the in- 
habitants, i. e. such as should occupy 
the country. 

As these prophecies were to be in 
the hands of the Jews before they 
left’ Babylon, and as the evils against 
which they were directed existed, at 
least in their germ, during the latter 
part of the captivity, it cannot be 
deemed any violation of hermeneu- 
tical consistency, to apply the restora- 
tion of the ruined cities here spoken 
of to that which took place after the 
return. This interpretation is prefer- 
able to that which would construe 
722, ver. 12, as signifying thy posterity, 
in reference to a distant futurity ; for 
there seems no ground for addressing 
such a promise to the Jews after their 
return, or even in the time of our 
Lord. 


CHAP. 11Χ.] 


ISATAH. 


429 


13 If thou restrain thy foot on the Sabbath, 
And do not thine own business on my holy day ; 
And call the Sabbath, a delight, 
And the holy day of Jehovah, honourable ; 


And honour it,— 
Not doing thine own ways, 


Nor attending to thine own business, 


Nor spending it in talk : 
14 


Then thou shouldst delight thyself in Jehovah ; 


And I would cause thee to ride over the heights of the earth ; 
And feed thee with the inheritance of Jacob thy father: 
For the mouth of Jehovah hath spoken it. 


13. Occasion is taken from the in- 
troduction of the subject of fasts, to 
advert to that of the Sabbath, the ob- 
servance of which was so strictly en- 
forced in the Mosaic law, and has, in 
all ages, been found essential to the 
maintenance and prosperity of spiri- 
tual religion. 2, business, worldly 
affairs, as ver.3. More than one hun- 
dred and twelve MSS., and eighteen 
printed editions, read 7257, in the 
plural. In niwy there is an ellipsis 
of the prepositive Ὁ, which is easily 
supplied from the preceding 29. 


Many MSS. supply ) before “779.— 
1217727 is used idiomatically for mere 
talk, or idle and unprofitable conver- 
sation. I have endeavoured, in the 
translation, to give the force of the 
idiom. 

14. ΡΠ is aptly borrowed from 
the use of 229 in the preceding verse. 
Comp. Ps. xxxvii. 4. The metaphor 
of riding over the heights is taken 
from military usage, and expresses 
the triumphant progress of the Jews 
in pee possession of the whole 
land. 


CHAPTER LIX. 


This chapter contains an awful picture of the depraved state of Jewish morals. 
To no period of their history does it appear so applicable, as to that imme- 


diately preceding the destruction of their polity by the Romans. 
testimonies adduced from Josephus in the note on chap. liii. 8. 


See the 
It thus 


connects with the portraiture of Pharisaism reprobated in the preceding 


chapter. 


The fact that no reference whatever is made to idolatrous prac- 


tices, proves that times succeeding the Babylonish captivity must be in- 
tended. In consequence of the aggravated sins of the Jews, God abandoned 
them to intestine broils, the rapacity and oppressions of wicked rulers, and 
the subjugating power of the Romans, whereby their national prosperity 
was destroyed, and they were reduced to circumstances of great distress. 


Pt el 


480 ISATAH. [CHAP. LIX. 


The prophet shews, 1, 2, that their pitiable condition was to be attributed, not 
to any want of ability in God to deliver them, but to their own sinfulness. 
He then enters into a minute specification of their crimes, with a view to 
shew that they richly merited the sufferings that had been inflicted upon 
them, 3—8 ; having finished which, he draws up a confession for them, and 
introduces them as bewailing their calamitous circumstances, and acknow- 
ledging their sins as the cause of the Divine displeasure, 9—15. On the 
failure of all human means of reformation, Jehovah is represented as him- 
self interposing, partly to effect salvation for his people, partly to take ven- 
geance on the incorrigible, and partly, afterwards, to execute judgment on 
the Romans, whom he had employed as the instruments of his vengeance, 
16—18. The prophet then foretells what would follow the destruction of 
imperial Rome,—the spread of true religion, first in Europe, and other 
parts of the west, &c., and afterwards in Asia; and the desperate effort of 
the last Antichrist, 19 ; and the chapter concludes with the announcements 
that the salvation of the Jews was the primary and immediate object of the 
Messiah’s advent, and that the Divine covenant made with the Jewish 
people, in the person of Abraham, shall assuredly take effect in their future 
general conversion, 20, 21. 

For regularity of structure, beauty and force of imagery, fidelity, and 
minuteness of graphic description, this section is quite in the best style 
of Isaiah. 


1 Benorp! the hand of Jehovah is not short, that it cannot save ; 
Nor is his ear heavy, that it cannot hear. 
2 But it is your iniquities that have made a separation between 
you and your God ; | 
And your sins have caused him to hide his face from you, and 
not to hear. 
3 For your hands are polluted with blood, 
And your fingers with imiquity ; 
Your lips speak falsehood, 
Your tongue uttereth wickedness. 


1—3. The prophet anticipates the 032 ὙΠΟ occurs. Comp. DX D9, 


complaints of the Jews respecting the 
calamitous state of their affairs, and 
fearlessly imputes it to their own 
guilt as the cause. Instead, therefore, 
of finding fault with the Divine con- 
duct, it behoved them to criminate 
themselves. 0°25 is used absolutely, as 
here, without the pronoun, Job xxxiy. 
29; Jer. ii. 27, xviii. 17: so that the 
proposed emendations of Secker and 
Lowth are uncalled for. In the first 
of these passages the very phrase 


Isa. 111. 3.—The idea of pollution 
appears to have been attached to 3, 
from the circumstance that the >s3, 
or Avenger of blood, was considered to 
have the blood of murder upon him, 
till he had avenged it. It is not 
a verb of the later Hebrew, as Gese- 
nius maintains, being found in this 
sense, Zeph. iii. 1; and may well have 
been used by Isaiah, who flourished 
little more than fifty years earlier. 


CHAP. 11Χ.] 


4 None advocateth justice, 


ISATAH. 


431 


Neither doth any one contend for truth ; 
They rely upon a thing of nought, and speak vanity ; 
They conceive evil, and bring forth iniquity. 


or 


They hatch the eggs of the basilisk, 


And weaye the webs of the spider ; 
He that eateth of their eggs shall die, 
And that which is crushed shall produce a viper. 
6 Their webs shall not become raiment, 
Neither shall they cover themselves with their works ; 
Their works are works of iniquity, 
And the deed of violence is in their hands. 


~ 


Their feet run to that which is evil, 


And they hasten to shed innocent blood: 
Their thoughts are thoughts of iniquity ; 
Destruction and havoc are in their paths. 
8 The way of peace they know not ; 
Neither is there any justice in their tracks: 
They make for themselves crooked paths ; 
None that walketh therein knoweth peace. 
9 Therefore, justice is removed far from us, 


And equity reacheth us not ; 


We look for light, but behold! darkness ; 
For brightness, but we walk in gloom. 

10 We grope about, like the blind, for the wall: 
Like those who have no eyes do we grope : 


5, 6. The figures here employed are 
simple, but forcibly expressive of the 
fruitlessness of all ungodly plans, and 
the certainty, that, sooner or later, 
they will recoil on the head of their 
inventors. | The very religion of such 
persons is utterly worthless. 779 is 
the fem. of the passive part. of 1%, 
to press, squeeze, crush: only Segol is 
substituted for Kametz, as 725 for 72), 
Zech. ν. 4. Why the substitution was 
made does not appear. 

7, 8. These verses are in part intro- 
duced by Paul into his quotations 
from the O. T. when describing the 
depravity of the Jews, Rom. iii. 15— 
17. The repetition of WT NX) DID 7D, 
under a different form, is ‘hot without 
emphasis. 


9, uSun and ΤΡῚΣ are here used in 
the sense of Divine judgments inter- 
posed to vindicate the cause of the 
nation. 

10. The charge of poverty and in- 
elegance brought by Lowth against 
the oe of T2W22 in this verse is 
unfair, and his adoption of 72223, the 
emendation proposed by Houbigant, 
altogether unwarranted. The Hebrew 
poets are fond of repetitions. See 
especially in Isaiah, chap. xi. 5, xv. 1, 
xvi. 12, 13, xix. 7, xlii. 19, lv.4. The 
prophet might have employed the 
synonymous verb wn; but he chose 
to repeat the unusual v3, for the sake 
of more emphatically giving expres- 
sion to the thought.—D22tx has been 
variously interpreted. In all proba- 


432 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. LIX. 


We stumble at noon, as in the twilight ; 
Like those that die in circumstances of plenty. 


ΠῚ 


We all of us growl like bears, 


And moan continually like doves ; 
We look for justice, but there is none ; 
For salvation, but it is far from us. 


12 


For our rebellious deeds are numerous before thee, 


And each of our sins testifieth against us ; 
For our rebellious deeds are with us; 
And as for our iniquities, we acknowledge them. 


13 


We have rebelled, and acted falsely towards Jehovah ; 


And have gone back from our God ; 
We have spoken words of violence and revolt ; 
We have conceived, and uttered from the heart, matters of 


falsehood. 
14 


And equity standeth aloof ; 


Justice also is made to withdraw, 


For truth stumbleth in the street, 


bility, it is a derivative from ἡ, to be 
Jat, with Aleph prosthetic ; and sig- 
nifies the dest, richest, most fuvourable 
circumstances in which persons can 
be placed. It is thus perfectly parallel 
with Onn in the preceding hemistich. 
Others less aptly compare 72%, Gen. 
XXVil. 28, 39, and o';0u, Dan. xi. 24. 
The meaning is, that no security was 
enjoyed, or could be hoped for. 

11. For the growling of the bear, 
comp. Ovid Metam. IT. 485: 


“Mens antiqua tamen facto quoque 
mansit in urso: 

Assiduoque suos gemitu testata do- 
lores ;” 


and for the plaintive moaning of the 
dove, chap. xxxviii. 14 ; Ezek. vii. 16. 
The language is that of dissatisfaction, 
grief, and despair. The Jewish affairs 
had become all but desperate. 

12. A deep-felt and frank confes- 
sion. To aggravate the guilt of sin, 
it is frequently spoken of in the 
Scriptures as being committed zz the 
presence of, or before GoD. ny, the 
sing. agrees distributively with 1»nNen 
in the plural—uanx, with us, i.e. in- 
stead of being forgotten, and thus 


removed from our view, our sins are 
seen and felt by us. Rosen. “culpz 
nostree nobis conscii sumus.” 

13. There is in this verse an unpa- 
ralleled accumulation of Infinitives: 
not only expressing more emphatically 
or powerfully, by this naked form of 
the verb, the continuity and enormity 
of the actions, but placing them in 
close juxtaposition, in order to render 
them more distinctly prominent in 
the aggregate. 2102 is not to be taken 
as the Niph. of 230, but is the Infin. 
of the root 302, with the same mean- 
ing. The verse is historically descrip- 
tive both of the immediate past, and 
of what was still in existence. As 
there is no mention of idolatry either 
here, or in the following verses, the 
rebellion against Jehovah specifically 
intended must be that alienation of 
heart which so awfully discovered 
itself in the sins enumerated by the 
prophet. 

14, ΠῚ properly signifies a wide 
open sfree/, but here it seems rather 
to be used in reference to the forum, 
or broad open place at the gate, where 
justice was administered. sia has a 
similar reference, 


CHAP. LIX.] 


And rectitude cannot enter. 


15 Yea, truth is missing, 


ISATAH. 


433 


And he that departeth from evil maketh himself a prey. 
And Jehovah saw, and it displeased him, 


Because there was no justice. 
16 


He saw also that there was no one ; 


And he was astonished that there was none to interpose ; 
Therefore his own arm wrought salvation for him, 
And his righteousness sustained him. 


17 


Yea, he put on righteousness as a coat of mail, 


And a helmet of salvation was on his head ; 
Yea, he put on garments of vengeance for apparel, 
And clothed himself with zeal as a mantle. 

18 According to their demerits, he will strictly render : 


15. Xm, Targ. puand; Vulg. pre- 
de patuit. Comp. Ps. lxxvi. 6. The 


᾿ root °73, Arab. Uw, signifies Zo draw 


out or off, to strip, plunder. 

16,17. Just at the time when the 
wickedness of the Jews had reached 
its height, and it was rendered evident 
to all that it could not be arrested by 
any human power, Jehovah interposes 
for the deliverance of his people, and 
the punishment of the wicked. In 
his usual anthropopathic style, Isaiah 
represents God as filled with amaze- 
ment at the discovery, that no one 
should be found qualified to reform 
and save the nation. Comp. chap. 
Ixiii, 5. odpinea forcibly expresses 
that complete mental disturbance into 
which one is thrown by the appear- 
ance of any thing unexpected or 
alarming. Root Ὁρῶ, to lay waste, 
destroy. That by 7Y%, salvation, we 
are to understand that spiritual deli- 
verance which the Redeemer came to 
effect, and not any temporal rescue, 
appears from the description given of 
his work, ver. 20. For 2259, see on 
chap. 111. 6,12. It is here used gene- 
rally to denote interposition. The idea 
of intercession is foreign to the pas- 
sage. To express the greatness of the 
conflict, and the qualifications of the 
Messiah to engage in it, language 
borrowed from the armour and dress 
of ancient warriors is employed. 


Comp. Eph. vi. 10—17; 1 Thess. v. 
8. Not only should the Mediator be 
possessed of resistless power, but also 
of moral purity, courage, and ardour. 
my27mn—w2 is too much in the style 
of our prophet to allow us for a 
moment to doubt of the genuineness 
of the latter word. Instead of being 
inelegant, as Jubb insinuates, it is 
singularly beautiful. 

18. Interpreters have raised un- 
necessary difficulties in reference to 
the repetition of the compound pre- 
position 3. For the alteration of 
Lowth, who reads °v3, there is no MS. 
authority, except perhaps that of 
Kennicott’s Cod. 126, which may also 
be merely an alteration in imitation 
of the Targ. The preposition itself 
occurs in this very form, in connexion 
with the verb 73, chap. lxiii. 7; and 
as to the repetition, it is not more 
harsh than that of 322, chap. 11]. 6; 
where there is an ellipsis of >, just 
as there is here of n\723,—both words 
being so easily supplied by the reader. 
On the contrary, there is an elegance 
attaching to it, as every one must 
perceive on reading the words: 


D2w Oyp nina WD. 


The emendation proposed by the Bi- 
shop— 

NT ΤΥ bya 

Dow m3 bv2 


484 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. LIX. 


Fury to his adversaries, retribution to his foes : 
To the maritime lands he will render retribution. 
19 Then shall those of the west fear the name of Jehovah ; 


And those of the sun-rise his 


is drawling and paraphrastic, and 
does not after all admit of the inter- 
pretation which he puts upon it. Pro- 
perly rendered, it would be— 


He is the Retributor ; 
The Retributor will requite. 


Nothing less in keeping with the 


style of the preceding verses could 


have been introduced. 

In this verse there is an obvious 
distinction between two classes of 
enemies on whom retribution was to 
be inflicted. The former, specially 
characterised as DN and ODS, are the 
wicked Jews so graphically described 
in the preceding part of the chapter, 
the atrocity of whose hostility was 
particularly manifested in the perse- 
cution of our Saviour and his fol- 
lowers. The Apostle expressly calls 
them ἐχθροὶ, scil. rod Θεοῦ, Rom. xi. 
28; and it is to them and their poli- 
tical excision that our Lord so em- 
phatically points, Luke xix. 27 ; comp. 
vers. 12—14. The retribution here 
predicted was rendered when Jeru- 
salem was destroyed, and the Jews 
scattered among the nations. The 
other class on whom vengeance was 
to be taken were the Romans—those 
inhabiting the D%x, or maritime re- 
gions to the west of Palestine. They, 
in their turn, met with retribution 
when the swarms of northern bar- 
barians poured in upon the empire, 
ravaged its provinces, plundered its 
cities, and ultimately effected its total 
overthrow. That the judgments which 
have since been, and are still to be 
inflicted on the European states, in 
punishment of their connexion with, 
and support of, the hostile power of 
Rome ecclesiastical, are also included 
in the prediction, I think highly pro- 
bable. Comp. Rev. xvi. 19, 20. 

19. The holy seer has next pre- 
sented to his inspired vision the 
spread of true religion in times sub- 
sequent to the overthrow of the 


glory ; 


Roman empire. It is particularly 
worthy of notice, that, while in every 
other passage of Scripture in which 
the spread of the Gospel is spoken of, 
it is uniformly represented as ad- 
vancing from the East towards the 
West, that order is here reversed. 
True religion is first set forth as 
flourishing in the West, and then in 
the Eastern regions of the earth. 
Whoever reflects on the actual amount 
of Scriptural piety in this country 
and America, (not excluding its pro- 
gress in the Continental states of 
Europe,) and compares it with the 
religious aspect of Asia,—at the same 
time surveying the successful efforts 
which are being made by European 
and American missionaries, both to 
regenerate the fallen Oriental churches, 
and to diffuse the light of Divine 
truth in the Mohammedan and Pagan 
countries of the East, can hardly 
avoid coming to the conclusion, that 
what we have lived to witness is an 
incipient fulfilment of the prophecy. 
The last desperate effort of the 
anti-Christian power now presents 
itself to the view of the prophet. 
That Ἢ is to be taken as a substan- 
tive, and the nominative to sv, and 
not as an adjective qualifying 173, the 
exigency of the passage absolutely 
requires. So Maurer decidedly. The 
event to which reference is made is 
not the execution of judgment pre- 
dicted in the preceding verse, but 
succeeds the spread of the Gospel 
predicted in the former half of the 
present. To no antecedent can the 
verb with any propriety be referred. 
The renderings, therefore, of the LXX. 
ἥξει yap ὡς ποταμὸς βίαιος ἡ ὀργὴ mapa 
Κυρίου, the Vulg., Lowth, Gesenius, 
Noyes, Hitzig, and others, cannot be 
sustained, Equally untenable is the 
principle of interpretation which 
would render Tim 1, ‘a strong or 
mighty wind? Such rendering ought 
long ago to have been repudiated as 
totally unfounded on Hebrew usage. 


CHAP. LIX. | 


ISATAH. 


435 


When the adversary cometh in like a river, 
The breath of Jehovah shall raise a standard against him. 
20 And the Redeemer shall come to Zion ; 
Even to those in Jacob that turn from transgression, saith 


Jehovah. 


21 For as to me, this is my covenant with them, saith Jehovah : 


My Spizit which is upon thee, 


In no instance can it be proved that 
the phrases O'7>x ΠῚ and Mim 1 have 
any such meaning. Whenever moun- 
tains, cedars, &c. are placed in con- 
struction with the Divine names, such 
names are not used as superlatives, 
but indicate the origin to which these 
objects are to be referred. See on 
chap. xiv. 13. A mighty wind is ex- 
pressed in Hebrew by 737310, That 
mm 1 is here equivalent to rnp 77, 
chap. xi. 4, and the corresponding 
TO πνεῦμα TOD στόματος αὐτοῦ, 2 Thess. 
il. 8, seems in the highest degree 
probable. The subject and all the 
circumstances are identical. 

What the prophet teaches is, that 
when the great visible Adversary of 
the cause of Christ upon earth—the 
1s by way of eminence—shall collect 
all his forces, in order to crush the 
people of God, a Divine mandate shall 
eall forth destruction upon them. 
Comp. Dan. vii. 26, 27; Rev. xix. 
, 11—21. περ", as to form, may either 
be the Benoni Part. of 002, ¢o lift up, 
elevate, as a standard ; whence Ὁ), ὦ 
banner or ensign ; or the third person 
singular in the Poel of Ὁ"), fo flee ; 
but as the latter verb is never used 
in a transitive acceptation, except in 
Hiphil, we are compelled to adopt 
the former, which is the rendering of 
our common version. Thus also, in 
effect, Theod. πνεῦμα Κυρίου ἐσημειώθη 
ἐν αὐτῷ ; Saad. & de er ΔΜ} γον" 
And so Dathe, Boothroyd, and Lee 
in his Heb. Lex. sub voc. It is equi- 
valent to D2 803, chap. v. 26 ; and the 
meaning is, that by the command of 
Jehovah his army should be called 
out and directed to the final and 
victorious conflict with the enemy. 

20, 21. It is impossible for any one 
impartially to examine the scope and 


management of the Apostle’s argu- 
ment, Rom. xi., and not to perceive 
that he quotes this passage in verses 
26, 27, for the express purpose of 
proving, from the Old Testament, the 
future conversion of the Jewish people. 
The chronology of the two writers is 
in the strictest harmony. For, as. 
Isaiah introduces the conversion of 
the Jews as happening after the 
general extension of true religion 
among the Gentiles, so Paul mani- 
festly links the two events together 
in the same order : “ Blindness in part 
is happened to Israel UNTIL THE FUL- 
NESS OF THE GENTILES BE COME IN. 
AND SO ALL ISRAEL SHALL BE SAVED: 
as it is written,” &c. Between the 
Hebrew text, the LXX., and the Greek 
of the Apostle, there are some verbal 
discrepancies ; but the general sense 
is the same. Instead of 7589, the 
LXX. read ἕνεκεν Σιὼν ; Paul, ἐκ Σιὼν. 
The former is not, indeed, at variance 
with the force of the Heb. preposi- 
tion; but as the latter is totally so, 
it has not without reason been sup- 
posed that the Apostle had in his 
mind Ps. xiv. 7, where the identical 
phrase occurs, in connexion with the 
deliverance of the Jews. For yvp ‘209 
aya, the LXX. have καὶ ἀποστρέψει 
ἀσεβείας ἀπὸ ᾿Ιακὼβ, which is followed 
by Paul. The principal idea being 
the conversion of the Jewish people, 
it made no difference to the Apostle’s 
argument, whether he viewed it ac- 
tively or passively. From the cir- 
cumstance that the advent of the 
Saviour is limited, in the way of pro- 
mise, to such of the Jews as should 
repent, and turn to God, we may 
safely infer that mas ᾿Ισραὴλ, ‘ all Is- 
rael,’ Rom. xi. 26, is not intended to 
convey the idea that every individual 
of the nation, but that the mass, the 


436 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. Lx. 


And my words which I have put into thy mouth, 
Shall not depart from thy mouth, 

Nor from the mouth of thy seed, 

Nor from the mouth of thy seed’s seed, saith Jehovah, 
From henceforth, even for ever. 


great body, the people generally, shall 
be saved. Comp., for a similar re- 
stricted use of πᾶς, Matt. 11. 3, i. 5. 
It clearly appears from chap. lxv. 11, 
that in the latter day there will still 
be a number of the Jews who will 
prefer their infidelity and secular 
interests to the sacred claims of reli- 
gion. That a future, and not the first 
advent of the Redeemer is intended, 
must be maintained, as more in ac- 
cordance with the spirit of the pas- 
sage. 

_ The subject, ver. 21, is the dispen- 
sation of the spirit and truth to the 
restored Israelites, of which they 
should no more be deprived as in 
times past. The change from the 
third person plural to the second 
singular is not uncommon in Hebrew, 
and seems to be here specially made 
with a view to give greater point and 
interest to the promise. The hypo- 
thesis of Gesenius, that Isaiah and 


his successors in office are meant, 
is totally unsupported by any thing 
in the context. The ¢erminus a quo, 
marked by 7529, from now, is not the 
period in which the prophet wrote, 
but that of the events to which the 
prediction refers—the future conver- 
sion of the Jews. For the due fulfil- 
ment of the prophecy, a corroborative 
pledge is afforded by their continued 
preservation as a distinct people. 

In the last verses of this chapter, 
the events of the future, though some 
of them widely distant from each 
other in point of time, are placed in 
close juxtaposition,—the whole having 
been presented, as in a perspective 
group, to the inward view of the pro- 
phet. On the subject of the future 
conversion of the Jews, the reader 
will find much information in a long, 
but interesting note of Michaelis, in 
his Anmerkungen, on these two verses. 


CHAPTER LX. 


That this and the remaining chapters mainly refer to the future prosperity 
and glory of the Jews, when restored to a state of church-relation to 
Jehovah, is the only position that can be maintained, consistently with 


a strict adherence to definite principles of interpretation. 


In our most 


esteemed commentaries there is a perpetual vacillaney between the literal 
and the spiritual, the Jews and the Gentiles, the past and the future, which 
is anything but satisfactory. From many of them, indeed, it is evident 
that their authors, notwithstanding their strong propensity to apply these 
predictions to the past and present privileges of the Christian Church, as 
made up of Gentile converts, and the still fuller enjoyment of these privi- 
leges during the Millennium, have been compelled to admit that the Jews 
are not altogether to be excluded, though they still begrudge them a re- 


establishment, as a converted community, in the land of Palestine. 


To me 


CHAP. LX.] ISATAH. 437 


it appears, from the close connexion of these chapters with the last verses 
of chapter lix.; from the obvious distinction kept up between the con- 
verted Jews and converted Gentiles ; from the direct recognition of restored 
cities, lands, vineyards, &c., which had long lain desolate ; as well as from 
the general bearing of the whole—that the glorious re-integration of the 
Jewish people into the Church of God is the exalted theme on which the 
prophet so largely expatiates, and in treating of which he may truly be 
said to have exhausted all the variety of imagery with which his style‘is so 
richly charged. Not that he loses sight of the Gentiles: on the contrary, 
they are repeatedly brought forward, though it certainly is rather for the 
purpose of gracing the triumphs of his own people, than of exhibiting 
them in the all-engrossing light in which they have usually been presented. 
How much soever he is to be regarded as the evangelical prophet, and how 
much soever he was raised above the contracted spirit by which his 
countrymen were too generally actuated, still he was a prophet of the Jews 
and to the Jews. Their interests as a people, both in the then present, and 
in the future, could not but deeply engross him: so that, while he hails 
with feelings of delight the extension of the blessings of salvation to the 
Gentile world, he anticipates with ecstatic joy the recovery of his “ brethren, 
his kinsmen according to the flesh.” 

The chapter may justly be viewed as an ἀποτέλεσμα or finished exhibition of 
the triumphant and glorious state of the church during the Millennium : 
the Jews, restored to their own land, and brought to acknowledge Jesus as 
the true and only Messiah, forming the central portion of the Divine 
kingdom, while distant nations cheerfully accord to them a due regard, 
not only as brethren in the faith, and partakers of the common salvation, 
but as “the natural branches,” again occupying their place in “their own 
olive tree,”—“ beloved for the fathers’ sakes,” Rom. xi. 21, 24, 28. Nothing 
can exceed the glowing colours in which the happy condition of the 
Millennial Church is here depicted. The figures are rich and varied ; the 
structure, grandeur, and flow of the poetic diction are admirable ; and the 
whole is calculated to produce and cherish the brightest expectations of 
the sacred ‘golden age.’ 

Fired by the prospect which had burst upon his vision, chap. lix. 20, 21, the 
prophet in the most animated manner summons Jerusalem, the personified 
representative of the Jewish people, to arise from her long state of deso- 
lation, and reflect the splendour imparted to her by Jehovah, 1, 2; and 
describes the nations with their rulers, merchants, and shepherds, as 
voluntarily and liberally contributing to her re-establishment, 3—7. The 
multitude of her dispersed sons have every facility afforded for their 
return, 8, 9 ; men of all nations and ranks resort to her, with their wealth 
and every thing that can add to her beauty and stability, 10—14; the 
most complete change takes place in regard to both her external and 
internal circumstances ; and the most complete provision is made for full, 
uninterrupted, and undiminished supplies of knowledge, purity, afd 
happiness, 15—22. 


ed 


ISAIAH. 


ARISB, shine, for thy light is come, 

And the glory of Jehovah hath arisen upon thee. 
For, behold! the darkness shall cover the earth, 
And gross darkness the people ; 


(CHAP. LX. 


But upon thee Jehovah shall arise, 
And his glory shall be seen upon thee. 
3 And nations shall come to thy light, , 
And kings to the brightness of thy rising. 
4 Lift up thine eyes around and behold ; 
They all collect themselves, they come to thee : 


Thy sons shall come from far, 


And thy daughters shall be borne on the side. 
5 Then thou shalt look, and brighten up ; 
Yea, thy heart shall throb and dilate ; 


1, 2. So evident isit that Jerusalem 
is here addressed, that the LXX., 
Vulg., Targ., and Saadias, have in- 
serted the term. The first mentioned 
version has, Φωτίζου φωτίζου "lepov- 
σαλὴμ: as if the translator had read 
“Hx He. Comp. chap. li. 17, hi. 1, 2. 
By the images of light and darkness 
in these verses are meant a state of 
trouble and distress on the one hand, 
and of prosperity and joy on the 
other. While the different nations 
shall be involved in the awful ca- 
lamities connected with the overthrow 
of the Antichristian confederacy, Dan. 
xii, 1, 6, 7; Rev. xviii. xix., the pe- 
culiar favour of Jehovah shall be 
manifested towards the Jews. To 
express this more forcibly, two figures 
are employed ; the one taken from 
the rising of the sun, and the other 
from the visible glory or splendour 
which the Israelites beheld in the 
wilderness. There may also be a re- 
ference to the contrasted circum- 
stances of the Israelites and Egyptians, 
Exod. xiv. 19—24. 

3. The report of the distinguished 
excellence and felicity of the restored 
church will bring strangers, and even 
monarchs, to view and participate in 
her blessedness. 

4. The reference in 05> is not to 
those spoken of in the preceding verse, 
but to the sons and daughters,—the 
future inhabitants of Jerusalem,— 


mentioned immediately after. These 
shall come from the most distant 
parts whither they shall have been 
scattered. 72 Y does not mean at the 
side, in the sense of being near, but oz 
the side, in reference to the Oriental 
custom of carrying children astride 
upon the hip, while they cling to the 
side of those who bear them. LXX. 
ἐπ᾽ ὥμων ἀρθήσονται, shall be carried on 
the shoulders. The idea of nursing, 
which also attaches to 3 Ν, is not so 
natural in this place as that of bearing 
or carrying, which is, indeed, the 
proper signification of the term, in 
application to the nursing of a child. 
See Numb. xi. 12; Isa. lxvi. 12. 

5. For 377, thou shalt see, fifty-four 
MSS., originally eleven, probably three 
more, now one other, and the Soncin. 
edition, read NYA, thou shalt fear, of 
which Abenezra, Vitringa, Lowth, Mi- 
chaelis hesitatingly, Doderlein, Dathe, 
Hensler, Gesenius, Moller, Boothroyd, 
Jenour, Jones, Noyes, and Scholz, 
approve. On the other hand, the 
common reading is supported by the 
LXX., Targ., Vulg., Syr., Saad., and is 
adopted by Tingstadius, Hitzig, and 
Maurer. Though, if viewed in con- 
nexion with the following hemistich, 
the proposed emendation might ap- 
pear the more natural, yet the repe- 
tition of 783, from ver. 4, is quite 
admissible, and may actually have 
come from the pen of the prophet. 


EE ee ee 


CHAP. 1Χ.] 


ISAIAH. 


439 


For the riches of the sea shall be turned to thee, 
The wealth of the nations shall come to thee. 
6 A multitude of camels shall cover thee, 
The young camels of Midian and Ephah ; 
All those of Sheba shall come ; 
They shall bear gold and frankincense, 
And publish the praises of Jehovah. 
7 All the sheep of Kedar shall be collected for thee ; 
The rams of Nebaioth shall serve thee ; 


m7, usually rendered ¢o fear, signifies 
here ¢o palpitate, throb, as the heart 
does in excessive joy. 72 signifies 
both ¢o flow, as water, and ¢o shine, be 


bright, &e, 
splenduit. Arab. bg, dies. The latter 


signification alone suits in this place, 
and expresses the cheerful indications 
of inward joy experienced by Jeru- 
salem. Theod. χαρήση; the Arab. 


Braga 'y—The sea is, as frequently, 


put for the maritime nations of the 
west. Thus the Targ. xiqv2 Wy, the 
wealth of the West. Comp. Deut. 
xXxxiil. 19. 

6, 7. From the merchants who 
traded in ships on the Mediterranean, 
and the nations of the west with 
which they had intercourse, the pro- 
phet turns to the rich merchants and 
the possessors of flocks in Arabia, and 
shews that they would be equally 
forward to minister to the wants of 
Zion. 022 are not dromedaries, but 


young camels, Comp. the Arab. x 


Comp. the Syr. δι 


and ἃς » parvus camelus, vel juvencus. 


The term for dromedaries is 117272, for 
which, see chap. lxvi.20. The camel, 
owing to his hardiness, his endurance 
of thirst, and the scanty food on 
which he is capable of subsisting, is 
well fitted to be a beast of burden in 


] dws the ship of the desert.— 


The places here specified all lay in 
Arabia; and as the inhabitants of 
that country have not been subject 
to the changes which those nations 
have undergone that lay more directly 
in the way of the great conquerors of 
antiquity, their descendants occupy 
nearly the same positions, and follow 
the same occupations.—}71, Midian. 
The tribes that went by this name 
appear to have inhabited the country 
between the northern extremity of 
the Arabian Gulf and Arabia Felix, 
and the plains of Moab, They were 
descended from Abraham by Keturah, 
Gen. xxv. 2, 4, and carried on a trade 
by caravans between Gilead and Egypt, 
as early as the days of Jacob. Abul- 
feda describes the ruins of a town 


called wpe on the east side of the 


above-mentioned gulf, in which di- 
rection we find a Mndiava spoken of 
by Ptol. v. 17, and a Madujvn_by 
Joseph. Antiq. ii. 11, 1.—py, LXX. 
Γαιφά, Hphah, occurs in connexion 
with Midian, Gen. xxv. 4; 1 Chron. 
i. 33. Bochart, Hieron. i. 81, 82, 
compares the” Ἵππος of Ptolemy, which 
the latter writer places near to Mndiava. 
—By x2, Sheba, is meant Arabia 
Felix, or the regions between the 
Persian Gulf and the Red Sea, now 
called the Hejaz. It abounded in 
spices, 1 Kings x. 2; Jer. vi. 20; 


desert countries, and is employed for, ,Ezek. xxvii. 22; especially in frank- 


this purpose, in all parts of the East, 
but in none more than Arabia. Some 
of them will carry ten hundred weight, 
though generally their loads are not 
heavy. The camel is hence not in- 
appropriately called by the Arabs, 


incense ; and in gold and precious 
stones, Ps. xxii. 15. Its inhabitants 
carried on a great trade, not only in 
their native productions, but also 
in Indian and Phoenician articles. 
According to Strabo, xvi., their 


440 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. LX. 


They shall willingly ascend my altar, 
And my beauteous house I will beautity. 
8 Who are these, that fly like a cloud ? 
And like doves to their windows ? 
9 Surely, the maritime lands shall wait for me, 
And the ships of Tarshish first ; 


To bring thy sons from afar, 


Their silver and their gold with them ; 


principal city was called Mariaba, (the 
present bo» about sixty miles to 


the N. E. of Sanaa,) though its ancient 
name, as occurring in Diod.. Sic. 
111. 47, is Saba. It is now generally 
agreed that it was the queen of this 
country who paid the celebrated visit 
to Solomon, 1 Kings x. 1—13. The 
Ὁ in 0% has for its antecedent not 
m3, &c. but the inhabitants or mer- 
chants understood—For Ἢρ, Kedar, 
see on chap. xxi. 16.—nn, the Ne- 
batheans, comprehended the principal 
tribes of Arabia Petreea, occupying 
a middle place between the Midianites 
and the inhabitants of Sheba. They 
appear anciently to have been divided 
in their occupations ; some carrying 
on a lucrative trade with caravans, 
and others addicting themselves ex- 
clusively to the nomadic life. The 
latter are described by Diodorus Sic. 
as deeming it unlawful to cultivate 
the ground or. trees ; to drink wine ; 
and to build houses.—Whatever the 
descendants of these Oriental tribes 
may possess shall be cheerfully placed 
at the disposal of the restored Jews. 
This is beautifully expressed by re- 
presenting the animals selected for 
sacrifice as mounting the altars of 
their own accord. There shall be no 
want of any thing that is required for 
the full restoration of Divine worship, 
when the mosque of Omar shall give 
place to a new temple to be erected 
for the celebration of the services of 
that ministration which exceedeth in 
glory, 2 Cor. 111. 8—11. pty and 
}zY are not synonymous. The latter 
signifies for acceptance, acceptably ; the 
former, here used, with pleasure, delight, 
or good-will. 

8. The verb ΠΡ ΡΠ is in the femi- 


nine plural, as a kind of absolute ; 
there being no substantive expressed 
or understood to which to refer it. It 
thus quite accords with the indefinite 
character of the interrogation. See 
Nordheimer’s Heb. Gram. § 737. 1, 2. 
The ideas conveyed by the images 
here employed are those of number 
and velocity. The reference to the 
doves is beautifully illustrated by a 
passage in Morier’s Second Journey in 
Persia. Speaking of the pigeon-houses 
near Ispahan, he says: “ They are 
large round towers, rather broader at 
the bottom than the top, crowned by 
conical spiracles, through which the 
pigeons descend. Their interior re- 
sembles a honey-comb, pierced with 
a thousand holes, each of which forms 
a snug retreat fora nest. The extra- 
ordinary flights of pigeons which I 
have seen upon one of these buildings, 
afford perhaps a good illustration of 
Isaiah lx. 8. Their great numbers, 
and the compactness of their mass, 
literally looked like a cloud at a 
distance, and obscured the sun in 
their passage.” The persons referred 
to are the Jews, who now flock in 
immense numbers from all quarters, 
to the land of their fathers, and 
Jerusalem, the summit of their earthly 
oy. 

‘ 9. The inhabitants of the west, es- 
pecially those which carry on maritime 
traffic, spiritually converted to God, 
shall lay their ships and wealth under 
contribution, to the accomplishment 
of the purposes of God relating to the 
restoration of the Jews to Palestine, 
and to the further advancement of 
the Divine glory. 72Ux3, LXX. ἐν 
πρώτοις, “among the first.” Twenty- 
five MSS. and the Syr. read 720872), 
i.e. as formerly, in reference to the 


CHAP. LX.]| 


ISATAH. 


441 


To the name of Jehovah thy God, 
And to the Holy One of Israel who hath beautified thee. 


10 


The sons of strangers also shal! build thy walls, 


And their kings shall serve thee ; 
Though in my wrath I smote thee, 
Yet in my good pleasure I will pity thee. 


11 


Thy gates also shall be open continually ; 


They shall not be shut by day, nor by night ; 
That the wealth of the nations may be brought into thee, 
And their kings conducted along. 


12 
perish ; 


For the nation and the kingdom that will not serve thee, shall 


Yea, those nations shall be utterly destroyed. 


13 


The glory of Lebanon shall come to thee, 


The cypress, the larch, and the pine together ; 
To beautify the place of my sanctuary, 
And I will make the place of my feet glorious. 
14 The sons also of thine oppressors shall come crouching to thee ; 


assistance rendered by the Tyrians to 
Solomon. For “the ships of Tar- 
shish,” see on chap. xxi. 10. The 
suffix in 02D) and 03m is to be referred 
to the Jews, and not to the commercial 
powers. Their property as well as 
themselves shall be conveyed, free of 
charge, to Palestine. Many of them 
living in remote parts, can only con- 
veniently return by sea. 

10. By 122723 are meant foreigners— 
Gentiles, such as had been accounted 
ΞΈΝΟΙ τῶν διαθηκῶν τῆς ἐπαγγελίας, 
but now συμπολῖται τῶν ἁγίων καὶ 
οἰκεῖοι τοῦ Θεοῦ, Eph. 11.12, 19. Such 
shall count it an honour to be em- 
ployed in rebuilding Jerusalem, and, 
im any way, contributing to the re- 
covery of the lost happiness of Israel. 
Monarchs shall regard it as a privilege 
to aid in the work, by employing 
whatever legitimate influence they 
may possess in advancing it. 

11. The idea conveyed by the gates 
never being shut, is that of the con- 
tinual arrival of the multitudes re- 
ferred to. Modern travellers greatly 
complain of the inconvenience to 
which they are put, when they do 
not reach Jerusalem before the gates 
are closed. The Apostle John borrows 


the language in his description of the 
new Jerusalem, Rev. xxi. 25. The 


‘ideas of security and peace are implied. 


—o 7) may either signify /ed along in 
chains, as captives, and thus the 
Targ. and Hitzig ; or in procession, 
by their devoted attendants, which 
seems the more natural interpretation, 

12. There is obviously a meiosis in 
this verse. The absence of active aid 
is construed into positive hostility, 
and punished accordingly. Comp. 
Judges v. 23. 

13. For the trees here specified, see 
on chap. xli. 19. A literal temple, or 
house of worship, being intended, the 
language must be literally explained. 
From all that appears to be the state 
of Palestine in regard to wood, supplies 
from Lebanon will be as necessary as 
they were when the ancient temple 
was constructed. “The place of” 
Jehovah's “feet,” is parallel to “the 
place of ” his “sanctuary ;” viz. Jeru- 
salem. 

14. Jerusalem hath literally been 
“trodden down” by many nations, 
Luke xxi. 24; and her scattered sons 
have been subject to greater calamities, 
arising from rapine and massacre, than 
any people under heaven. Not only 


442 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. LX. 


Yea, all that despised thee shall prostrate themselves at the 


soles of thy feet ; 


And shall call thee, The City of Jehovah, 
Zion of the Holy One of Israel. 

15 Instead of thy having been deserted and hated, 
So that no one passed through thee, 
I will make thee an eternal excellency, 
The joy of successive generations. 

16 Thou shalt also suck the milk of the nations; 
Yea, the breast of kings thou shalt suck ; 
And shalt know that I, Jehovah, am thy Saviour, 
And thy Redeemer, the Protector of Jacob. 

17 Instead of copper, I will bring gold ; 
And instead of iron, 1 will bring silver ; 


And instead of wood, copper ; 


and instead of stones, iron ; 


And I will make thy overseers peaceful, 


And thy rulers righteous. 


in the East, but in almost every 
country of Europe, the most violent 
and tragical outrages have been com- 
mitted upon them. The descendants 
of her oppressors, however, will ac- 
knowledge the wrongs that have been 
done to her, and humbly crave a share 
in her privileges. Instead of jr, 
Zion, Hitzig reads ΤῊΣ, cippus, a pillar, 
but violently in such connexion. 
mms, the construct punctuation for 
minw, the absolute. 

15, nn merely expresses, zz exchange 
for ; though from the circumstances of 
the case the idea of compensation is 
necessarily implied. 0%¥ is here used, 
as in many other places, for a period 
of long and unknown duration. 

16. A repetition, in somewhat dif- 
ferent language, of what is predicted, 
verses 3,5, 10, and 11. Comp. Rev. 
xxi, 24. “Sucking the breast of 
kings” is unusual, and by fastidious 
critics may be deemed unnatural ; but 
the phrase is merely employed for the 
purpose of carrying out more effi- 
ciently the idea taught in the preced- 
ing clause ; viz. that abundant contri- 
butions would be made by the inhabi- 
tants of the different nations to the 
sustenance of Zion. Kings are intro- 
duced on account of their greater 


wealth and influence, which they shall 
now expend upon the cause of God, 
instead of squandering them, as for- 
merly, upon objects of vanity and sin. 
For Ὅν, Protector, see on chap. i. 24. 
17. For the repeated use of 7m in 
this verse, comp. chap. 111. 24. Such 
identity of style corroborates the 
authenticity of the present portion of 
the book. The temporal prosperity of 
the restored Israelites shall resemble 
that of their ancestors in the days 
of Solomon, 1 Kings x. 27; 2 Chron. 
ix. 20, 27. N37, the LXX. doubtless 
rendered τοὺς ἐπισκόπους σου, thine in- 
spectors or bishops, though these words 
and τοὺς apxovras σου, thy rulers, the 
proper rendering of 7025, have, in the 
course of transcription, exchanged 
places. Both terms are here used to 
designate the office-bearers, or rulers 
of the restored Jewish community,— 
the one, those who shall superintend 
its spiritual, and the other, those who 
shall administer its temporal, affairs. 
Comp. the use of ἐπισκοπὴ, 1 Tim. 11]. 
1, and the combination ἐπίσκοποι καὶ 
διάκονοι, Philip. i. 1. This is the only 
passage in which ‘33 is used in a good 
sense, It otherwise signifies a task- 
master, a collector of tribute, or an 
oppressive ruler. Instead of being, as 


CHAP. 1,Χ.] 


ISAIAH. 


445 


18 Violence shall no more be heard in thy land, 
Nor devastation or destruction within thy borders ; 
But thou shalt call thy walls, Salvation, 


And thy gates, Praise. 
19 


The sun shall no more be for light to thee by day, 


Neither shall the moon enlighten thee with brightness ; 
For Jehovah shall be to thee an everlasting light, 
And thy God shall be thy beauty. 


20 Thy sun shall no more set, 


Neither shall thy moon withdraw herself ; 
For Jehovah shall be to thee an everlasting light, 
And the days of thy mourning shall be ended. 


21 


And as for thy people, they shall all of them be righteous ; 


They shall inherit the land for ever ; 
The branch of my planting, the work of my hands, 


That I may be glorified. 
22 


The little one shall become a thousand, 


And the small one a mighty nation : 
I, Jehovah, will hasten it in its season. 


formerly, contentious and unjust, the 
Jewish officers shall seek to promote 
peace, and satisfy the just claims of all 
who are under their government. 
ove and API are the abstract used 
for the concrete. 

18. Oppression and war shall no 
more be known. The most perfect 
security shall be enjoyed; and the 
very gates shall re-echo the praises of 
Jehovah. 

19, 20. These verses further depict, 
in language of the most sublime 
imagery, the superlative degree of 
happiness which shall be enjoyed by 
the new and holy Jerusalem church. 
Its ordinary sources shall no longer be 
thought of. Jehovah himself shall be 
found to be a glorious and unfailing 
fountain of joy. “ Lux Jove (i.e. for- 
tuna tua prospera, cujus Jova auctor 
erit) tanta est futura, ut pro nihilo 
zstimanda sit lux solis aut lune.” 
Maurer. The language is ad sensum 
quoted and applied to the same state 
of things, Rev. xxi. 23, xxii. 5. The 
LXX. and Targ. have read, or at least 
supplied, 72°, which may have origin- 
ally been omitted by an ellipsis. The 


concluding words of ver. 20, furnish 
a key to the meaning of both verses. 

21. Comp. Rev. xxi. 27, and 7. The 
character of the inhabitants of Zion 
shall be in accordance with the dignity 
of their privileges. In support of 
the Keri ‘Yo. we have the authority 
of forty-four MSS., and seven others 
originally, and that of the Syr., Vulg., 
and Targ.; according to which the 
restoration of the Jews is, under a 
beautiful figure, directly ascribed to 
Jehovah. Comp. chap. 1xi. 3. 

22. The Jews, who are compara- 
tively few in number in any country, 
and are despised by those among 
whom they live, shall form a nume- 
rous and powerful nation when con- 
gregated in their own land. Malte 
Brun estimates their present number 
at between four and five millions. 
The period of their return is not 
specified by the prophet, but he 
speaks of it as fixed and definite: 
mnyi, at its proper season, the period 
appointed for its taking place. For 
its certainty, the Divine declaration is 
a sufficient guarantee. 


444 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. LXI. 


CHAPTER LXI. 


The same subject is here continued. The recovery of Israel formed an im- 
portant part of the Messiah’s commission, which he is introduced as assert- 
ing, 1—3. Brought back to their own land, they shall rebuild its cities 
that have long lain desolate, 4 ; foreigners shall perform their more menial 
labours, while they addict themselves to the services of religion, amply 
supported by the rich contributions of those who live in other countries, 5, 
6; and full compensation shall be made to them for all the infamy and 
pillage to which they have been subject, 7—9. Not only restored exter- 
nally, but invested with moral excellence, they raise a hymn of praise for 
the wonderful change which they have experienced, 10, 11. 


1 THe Spirit of the Lord Jehovah is upon me ; 

For Jehovah hath anointed me, 

To publish glad tidings to the afflicted, 

He hath sent me to bind up the broken-hearted, 

To proclaim liberty to the captives, 

And to those that are bound, complete deliverance ; 
2 To proclaim the acceptable year of Jehovah, 

And the day of vengeance of our God ; 


To comfort all that mourn ; 


1—3. That the speaker in this pas- 
sage is not the prophet himself, as 
maintained by Michaelis, van der Palm, 
Rosenmiiller, Gesenius, Hitzig, and 
Scholz, but the Great Messiah, I can- 
not but contend, on the highest pos- 
sible authority. On reading the words 
to the Jews assembled in the syna- 
gogue at Nazareth, while their eyes 
were intently fixed upon him, he 
most unequivocally applied them to 
his own commission, and proceeded to 
explain their cheering import to the 
people, Luke iv. 16—22. No principle 
of accommodation, or of secondary 
application, can at all satisfy the 
claims of the announcement, “This 
day is this scripture fulfilled in your 
ears.” It must, however, be observed, 
that this completion merely lay in our 
Lord’s entering upon the public dis- 
charge of his prophetic office among 


the Jews. Far from being confined 
to the instructions of that particular 
day, it was to be exercised in perpe- 
tuity, during the continuance of the 
church upon earth, and pre-eminently, 
as it respects the Jews, at the future 
period here referred to.—The Messiah 
first announces the source of his quali- 
fications for the office of Teacher— 
the influences of the Divine Spirit. 
Comp. chap. xi. 2. He then enume- 
rates the principal features of the 
character of those to whom he was 
commissioned to impart relief—the 
afflicted, the broken-hearted, the cap- 
tives, the prisoners, the mourners, and 
the desponding. These terms are ac- 
cumulated in order to express more 
forcibly the awful state of spiritual 
misery and distress in which they are 
naturally involved, and from which he 
was sent to rescue them. Such will 


CHAP. LXI.| 


ISAIAH. 


445 


3 ΤῸ make glad the mourners in Zion ; 
To give them beauty instead of ashes, 
The oil of gladness instead of mourning, 
The garment of praise instead of a desponding spirit ; 
And they shall be called, the Trees of Righteousness, 
The Plantation of Jehovah; that he may be glorified. 
4 Then shall they build up the ancient ruins, 
They shall raise up the former desolations ; 
And they shall renovate the waste cities, 
The desolations of successive generations, 
5 Strangers also shall stand and feed your flocks ; 
Yea, the sons of the alien shall be your ploughmen and 


vine-dressers. 


6 But ye shall be called, The Priests of Jehovah ; 
Ye shall be named, The Servants of our God: 


pre-eminently be the condition of the 
Jews when God visits them in mercy 
in the latter day. See Zech. xi. 9—14. 
Do» is derived from 73%, to lead, lead 
captive, subdue, afflict, humble, &c.; and 
may either signify the afflicted, or the 
humble, meek, &c. according to the con- 
nexion. In the present instance the 
former acceptation is the more appro- 
priate. 
which Hitzig approves ; and this ren- 
dering is retained by Luke. The 
terms “captives” and “ prisoners” 
are to be taken metaphorically, and 
have no reference to external re- 
straint. Comp. Job xl. 10. WW is 
specially used of the liderty granted to 
slaves, when they were manumitted 
at the jubilee, which, on this account, 
was called W717 Πρ, the year of liberty, 
Ezek. xlvi. 17. Instead of TPT, 
twelve MSS., and the Complut. Edit., 
read ΠΡ, thus presenting one word 
in the reduplicate form, for the sake 
of intensity. Some, with De Dieu, 


compare the Ethiop. (BP qh: a chain, 


and the Chald. 777, the same; and 
render, fo open the prison, a3 in our 
Common Version; but the former 
seems preferable, especially as it has 
the support of the LXX., Vulg., Targ., 
and Saad. For the form, comp, %”An», 
Deut. xxxii. 5. The meaning is a com- 


‘ 


The LXX. have πτωχοῖς, of 


plete opening of the prison. After ov 
supply ivy. In ἫΝ nom we is an 
elegant paronomasia. 

The “day of vengeance,” here con- 
nected with the “acceptable year of 
the Lord,” designates the period of 
Judgment referred to chap. lix. 18, 19, 
—the punishment of the last Anti- 
christ. By piza-?s are not meant 
geseqnete Terebinthen, as Gesenius ren- 
ders, nor oaks of truth, as Lowth ex- 
plains them, but frees producing right- 
eousness as their fruit. Comp. Phil. i. 
11. is here used generically. 

4, 5. These verses admit of no con- 
sistent interpretation, except on the 
principle that the Jews are to be re- 
stored to the land of their fathers. 
The ruins and desolations are those 
of cities that had once been inhabi- 
ted ; and cannot, without the utmost 
violence, be applied to the heathen 
world. 2x) Ποῦ, Gesenius renders, 
the desolations of the forefathers, but less 
aptly than taking Dts) adjectively. 

6. Comp. Exod. xix. 6. The lan- 
guage implies holiness, spirituality, 
and devotedness to the service of God. 
So abundant shall be the supplies, 
that there shall be no absorption of 
time by the cares and distractions of 
business. W2N7, the Hithp. of 12x, 


Arab, ys to command, order ; hence 


3K 


440 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. LXI. 


Ye shall consume the wealth of the nations, 
And have their riches at your command. 
7 Instead of your shame, there shall be double; 
And instead of ignominy, they shall rejoice in their portion ; 
For in their land they shall inherit the double, 
They shall have everlasting joy. 


8 For I, Jehovah, love justice, 


I hate the rapine of wickedness ; 

And I will faithfully grant their reward, 

And make an everlasting covenant with them. 
9 And their seed shall be known among the nations, 
_ And their offspring among the people; 

All that see them shall acknowledge them, 

That they are a seed whom Jehovah hath blessed. 


10 


I will greatly rejoice in Jehovah ; 


My soul shall exult in my God: 

For he hath clothed me with the garments of salvation ; 
He hath covered me with the robe of righteousness ; 

As the bridegroom dresseth himself splendidly, 

Or as the bride adorneth herself with her jewels. 


11 


For as the earth causeth her produce to come forth, 


And as the garden causeth the things sown in it to grow up, 
So the Lord Jehovah shall cause righteousness to spring up, 
And praise, before all the nations. 


pels an emir. Others, to change, have 


in exchange, to have, or enjoy instead of 
another. 

7. The Jews have been the subjects 
of ignominy among all nations. When 
restored, the honour conferred upon 
them by Jehovah, and the estimation 
in which they shall be held by believ- 
ing Gentiles, will far overbalance the 
contempt in which they have been 
held. Sn, double, ie. ample, full. 
See on chap. xl. 2. The change of 
person we have often had occasion to 
notice. 

8. 73» the same as MY. Thus the 


Syr. os , and several MSS. By “the 


rapine of injustice” is meant what is 
taken away unjustly. The 2 in mva 
is that of instrument; LXX. ἁρπάγ- 
para ἐξ ἀδικίας. Comp. Job v. 16; 


Ps. lviii. 3, lxiv. 7. The reference is 
to the acts of flagrant injustice which 
have been committed on the Jews by 
the Gentile nations, among which 
they have been scattered. 

9, Ὁ in D> is pleonastic. 

10, 11. Jerusalem, as the represen- 
tative of the Jews, joyfully and grate- 
fully raises a hymn of praise to her 
great Deliverer. Instead of any longer 
sitting in the dust, in squalid attire, 
and with a downcast look, she is 
decked in the most splendid festal 
garments. 773, fo officiate as priest; 
here ¢o appear as a priest, thus officiat- 
ing; Aq. ὡς νύμφιον ἱερατευομένον 
στεφάνῳ; Symm. according to the 
meaning, κεκοσμημένον στεφάνῳ ; and 
so the Vulg. The allusion is to the 
mitre and golden crown of the high 
priest when fully attired. For ver. 11, 
comp. chap. xlv. 8; Ps. Ixxxy. 11, 12. 


ISATAH. 447 


CHAP. LXII.| 


CHAPTER LXII. 


This chapter contains a further development of the happy condition of the 
Jewish people, when brought to the knowledge of the Messiah. This deve- 
lopment is furnished in vers. 2, 3,4, and 5. In vers. 1 and 6, the Messiah 
himself is introduced as interesting himself for the prosperity of Zion, and 
calling upon those whom he had appointed to superintend her affairs to be 
unremitting in their supplications on her behalf, 7. And, after announcing 
the oath of Jehovah, pledging the exercise of his omnipotence to her resto- 
ration, 8, 9, and directing every preparation to be made, 10, the prophet, 
in one of his finest strains, presents to view the advent of the Saviour for 
the recovery of the Jews, and the happy state of Jerusalem, when rebuilt, 


and inhabited by a holy and sincerely religious people, 11, 12, 


1 For the sake of Zion I will not be silent, 
Nor, for the sake of Jerusalem, will I be quiet, 
Till her righteousness go forth as brightness, 
And her salvation as a blazing torch. 

2 Then shall the nations behold thy righteousness, 


And all kings thy glory ; 


And thou shalt be called by a new name, 
Which the mouth of Jehovah shall express. 
3 And thou shalt be a beautiful crown in the hand of Jehovah, 


1. There is considerable doubt re- 
specting the speaker in this verse. 
The prophet, the Messiah, the Jewish 
people, and Jehovah, have each been 
supposed to be intended. The second 
opinion seems decidedly entitled to 
the preference, on the ground of the 
frequency with which the Redeemer 
is thus abruptly introduced by our 
prophet. Through his mediatorial 
intercession the Jews shall be restored 
to their standing in the Church of 
God. 

2. It is here predicted that Israel 
shall be invested with a character 
altogether new—the result of the 
change effected by the gracious inter- 
position of Jehovah. That 0 is not 


to be understood of a mere name, but 
has special reference to state and 
character, is obvious from the common 
idiom by which any thing is said to 
be called what it really is. See chap. 
1. 26, 73, to penetrate, cut, hew, mark, 
express by distinct signs ; hence, distin- 
guish y name, Nurab. i. 17. 

3. It has been thought by some 
that there is a want of congruity in 
representing the crown as in the 
hand, instead of its being upon the 
head ; but it must be obvious, that 
with no propriety whatever could the 
church be spoken of as placed on the 
head of Jehovah. The language is 
designed to teach the high estimation 
in which Jerusalem shall be held by 


448 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. LXII. 


And a royal diadem in the palm of thy God. 
4 Thou shalt no more be called, Forsaken ; 
Neither shall thy land be any more termed, Desolate ; 
But thou shalt be called, My-delight-is-in-her ; 
And thy land, The Married Woman: 
For Jehovah shall delight in thee, 
And thy land shall be married. 
5 For as a young man marrieth a virgin, 
So shall they that build thee marry thee ; 
And as the bridegroom rejoiceth over the bride, 
So shall thy God rejoice over thee. 
6 Upon thy walls, O Jerusalem! have I appointed watchmen, 
That shall never be silent the whole of the day nor the whole 


of the night ; 


Ye that make mention of Jehovah, be not silent : 


7 Neither allow him to be silent, 


Till he establish, and till he make Jerusalem 


A praise in the earth. 


the Most High, and her perfect secu- 
rity under his protection. 23 is 
properly a turban or tiara wound 
round the head; and, as worn by 
Eastern monarchs, studded with the 
most valuable jewels. The word is 
thus exhibited in the Keri, and in 
three MSS. in the text, instead of 
FM, the usual Chethib. 

4. As the names here specified are 
merely symbolical, and will never be 
employed as proper names, I have 
deemed it right to give them in a 
translated form, rather than retain 
them. Indeed, their exhibition in 
this form alone renders the concluding 
lines of the verse intelligible. Hephzi- 
bah was otherwise the name of the 
mother of Manasseh, 2 Kings xxi. 1. 

5. The correlatives 1x) and 2 are 
twice to be supplied in this verse. 
Yet there is no reason to suppose, 
with Lowth, that they ever existed in 
the text. Their absence is nothing 
more than a poetical ellipsis. Instead 
of 723, thy sons, Lowth, Koppe, Mi- 
chaelis, Déderlein, v. d. Palm, Ting- 
stadius, Méller, and others, point 1.33, 
thy builders, and consider the plural 


to be used for the singular, as 7 Ὁ, 
chap. liv. 5,—Jehovah being meant in 
both instances. To this it cannot be 
objected, that when plural attributives 
are ascribed to the Deity, the verb is 
put in the singular, and not in the 
plural as we here find p yn; for 
though this holds as a general rule, 
yet there are exceptions, as Gen. xx. 
13, xxxv. 7;.2 Sam. vii. 23.° Such 
construction is required by the corre- 
sponding position of ΤΠ in the 
parallel member of the verse, and at 
once removes the incongruous image 
of sons marrying their own mother. 

6,7. The speaker is still the Mes- 
siah, who declares that he would place 
faithful teachers in Jerusalem, and 
charges them to be incessant in 
prayer for her complete restoration, 
and the extension of her fame through- 
out the world. The mention of “the 
walls” proves that the reference is 
not to the priests and Levites who 
kept watch about the temple, as 
Lowth supposes, but to those who 
were appointed to watch the city 
itself. Comp. xxi. 6, 8, 11, lii. 8, lvi. 
10; Hab. 11. 1. 


CHAP. LXII.] ISAIAH. 449 


8 Jehovah hath sworn by his right hand, and by his mighty arm ; 
I will no more give thy corn for food to thine enemies ; 
Neither shall the sons of the alien drink thy wine, 

For which thou hast laboured. 

9 But they that reap it shall eat it, 

And shall praise Jehovah ; 

And they that bring it in, shall drink it 

In my holy courts. 

Pass through, pass through the gates ; 

Prepare the way for the people ; 

Cast up, cast up the highway ; 

Clear it of stones ; 

Raise a banner for the people. 

11 Behold! Jehovah proclaimeth to the end of the earth : 

Say ye to the daughter of Zion, Behold! thy Saviour cometh ; 
Behold! his reward is with him, 
And his recompense before him. 


Then shall they be called, The Holy People; The Redeemed 


10 


12 


of Jehovah ; 


And thou shalt be called, frequented ; 


The City Unforsaken. 


8, 9. The enemies of Israel having 
all been swept away by the powerful 
judgments of God, the most perfect 
tranquillity shall reign throughout 
the land, and those who may go up 
to worship at Jerusalem shall enjoy 
unmolested the fruit of their labour. 

10. This verse contains a call to 
the inhabitants of the cities that may 
lie in the way of the returning Israel- 
ites, to go forth and remove every 
obstacle that impeded their progress. 
By vara, as well as ova, the peculiar 
people are intended. 

11. The “daughter of Zion” means 


here the rightful inhabitants of Jeru- 
salem, 7.¢. the Jews scattered over the 
face of the earth. Comp. chap. i. 8, 
xxill. 10. To them the announcement 
is made. That “salvation” is used 
metonymically for “Saviour,” the 
following pronominal affixes shew. 
Comp. chap. xl. 5, 9, 10, which is 
strictly parallel in language, though 
the advents in the two passages are 
different. 

12. The Jews shall now be a holy 
people, redeemed from all iniquity, 
and thronging their ancient capital 
for religious purposes. 


450 ISAIAH. [CHAP. LXIII. 


CHAPTER LXITITI. 


The first six verses of this chapter appear, at first sight, to stand quite insu- 
lated, and to admit of no interpretation in connexion with the subject 
treated of in the preceding and subsequent context. They have accordingly 
been regarded by many as merely a fragment of some other prophecy, 
which has, by mistake, found its way into this portion of the book. On 
closer attention being paid, however, to the character and scope of the 
chapter, there seems great propriety in bringing forward, in this place, the 
destruction of Idumeea, as an instance of Jehovah’s interposing goodness in 
behalf of the Jewish nation. The object of the prophet is to deduce an 
argument from God’s dealings with his ancient people, in favour of his 
graciously regarding them in their then distantly future dispersion ; but, 
instead of commencing with the deliverance from Egypt, he begins with 
the last which they should have experienced as a nation; viz. that which 
took place when the Idumzean power was subverted, according to the special 
predictions contained in chap. xxxiv. The passage, therefore, contains no 
new prophecy, but merely the adduction of a fact already predicted, for the 
sake of illustration. To apply it to any future judgments to be inflicted on 
the country formerly occupied by the Edomites, is equally unjustifiable with 
the attempt to apply it figuratively to the future enemies of the Church in 
general, or to the Roman Antichrist in particular. See Introd. to chap. 
XXXIV. 

The subject of Divine interposition, for the destruction of the Edomites, is 
beautifully brought out in a dramatic form,’by the introduction of two 
interrogations; the reply to the last of which completely exhausts it, 1—6 ; 
a brief review is then taken of other signal acts of Divine loving-kindness 
towards Israel, notwithstanding the rebelliousness of that people, 7—14 ; 
and the.rest of the chapter is occupied with pleadings for a renewal of such 
gracious interference for their ultimate deliverance, 15—19. 


1 Wuo is this that cometh from Edom ? 


1. In prophetic vision, a triumphant 
conqueror is discovered, arrayed in 
military attire, and returning from 
Idumza,—the scene of battle and vic- 
tory. To excite attention, the ques- 
tion is put—who can he be? To 
which he himself replies, in language 
which leaves us at no loss to doubt, 
that he is the Divine Loagos or 


SPEAKER, who, from the beginning, 
revealed the will of God to men; 
and, as the Angel or Messenger of 
the Divine presence, acted as the Pro- 
tector and Saviour of ancient Israel. 
See ver. 9. This interpretation, which 
is that adopted by most commenta- 
tors, both ancient and modern, alone 
satisfies the claims of the passage ; 


CHAP. LXIII. | 


In purple array from Bozrah ? 


ISAIAH. 


451 


This, that is glorious in his apparel, 
Advancing stately in the greatness of his strength ? 
It is I, the Announcer of righteousness,— 


Mighty to save. 
2 Why is thine apparel red ? 


And thy garments like those of him that treadeth in the wine- 


vat ? 


3 I have trodden the wine-press by myself, 
And of the people no man was with me ; 


Yea, I trod them in my anger, 


And trampled them in my fury; 


but nothing can be more preposterous, 
or more directly at variance with the 
entire spirit of it, than the applica- 
tion which some have made of it to 
the victory which he obtained upon 
the cross. y127 is well explained by 
Bochart, Hieroz. i. lib. ii. cap. vii., of 
the brilliancy of scarlet affecting the 
eye, as the sharpness of vinegar does 
the palate. He instances the Greek 
χρῶμα ὀξύ, πορφύραι ὀξύταται, ὀξυ- 
φέγγη, ἕο. The verb properly signi- 
fies to ferment, become acid. Comp. the 
sf 


Syr. potas acidus factus est ; and the 
Arab. Ure» acidus fuit. Some are 


of opinion that the garment here 
spoken of means the purple cloak of 
a military general; but it seems more 
natural to explain it by verses 2 and 
3, in which it is represented as made 
red by the blood of the enemy having 
been sprinkled upon it. Comp. Rey. 
xix. 13, “περιβεβλημένος ἱ ἱμάτιον βεβαμ- 
μένον αἵματι, which is obviously bor- 
rowed from this passage in Isaiah,— 
‘O AOTOS, the name there given to 
the warrior corresponding exactly to 
1272, by which he here characterises 
himself, mys signifies ¢o turn, move in 
any way ; here, to proceed with the 
head tossed or turned back, indicating 
the proud mien of the triumphant 
warrior.—3 in 7772 is to be taken in 
the sense of concerning, in regard to ; 
“JT that speak respecting righteous- 
ness,” announce, or make it known. 
For instances, see Noldius. 


2. For the treading in the wine- 
press, see on chap. xvi. 10, and comp., 
for its figurative application to the 
discomfiture of enemies in battle, 
Lam.1.15; Joel iii. 13; Rev. xix. 15. 
In 08, red, is evidently an allusion to 
DIN, ver. 1. Instead of > qwy, fifty-six 
MSS. , originally three more, and the 
Penta. Prag. 1518, the TX, . and 
Syr. read spun} in the plural. 

3. 2 occurs only here and Hag. 
ii. 16. It comes from ὙΒ, fo break, 
break in pieces. Hence it signifies the 
place where the grapes are broken by 
treading. Mz, an unusual term, em- 
ployed here and ver. 6, to denote dlood. 
It properly signifies the juice or liquor 
which is spirted from the grape. LXX. 
αἷμᾳ ; Lowth, /ife-blood. Comp. the 


Arab. ce , conspersit: and the Eth. 


5H: which is used of the sprinkling 


of blood, Heb. ix.19,—F>s28 stands for 
HINT, and i is, in all probability, to be 
ascribed to some copyist, who, being 
familiar with the Aramaic, in which 
xis the preformant, instead of the 7 
in Hebrew, substituted the one for 
the other. The change has occasioned 
a trifling variety of reading in a couple 
of MSS., but none reads °n?827. — 
When the victor declares, that none 
of the people or nations rendered 
him any assistance in the attack upon 
Edom, he refers to the fact, that ven- 
geance had not been taken upon that 
nation, as it had been upon Tyre, 
Moab, Egypt, &c., through foreign 


452 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. LXIII. 


So that their blood is sprinkled on my garment, 
And I have stained all my apparel. 
4 For the day of vengeance was in my heart, 
And the year of my redeemed was come. 
5 And I looked; but there was no helper ; 
And I was astonished that there was no supporter ; 
Then my own arm wrought salvation for me, 
And my own fury supported me. 
6 Yea, I trod the people in my anger, 
I even brake them in pieces in my fury ; 
And I made their blood flow down to the earth. 
7 I will celebrate the kindness of Jehovah, 


The praises of Jehovah, 


According to all that Jehovah hath bestowed upon us ; 
And the great goodness toward the house of Israel, 
Which he hath bestowed upon them in his tender mercies, 
And according to his great kindness. 

8 For he said, Surely they are my own people ; 


intervention. Identifying the Jews 
under the Maccabees and Hyrcanus 
with himself, by whom they were 
employed as native instruments, he 
vindicates the glory of the deed from 
all aid obtained from an extraneous 
source. Comp. Ezek. xxv. 14. 

4, 5. Comp. chap. lix.16. The lan- 
guage in this place is strongly anthro- 
popathic. Help was required, but 
there was none. Assyria and Baby- 
lon, that had formerly been employed 
in executing the Divine judgments, 
were no more. Jehovah, therefore, 
led forth his own people against their 
ancient enemy, and gave them the 
victory. Nearly thirty MSS. read, or 
have read, ‘nz, my righteousness, in- 
stead of ὙΠ, my fury, and the same 
reading is found in four ancient Edi- 
tions ; but it is manifestly a correc- 
tion from chap. lix. 16, 

6. The action of treading out the 
wine is repeated from ver. 3, only in 
a more condensed form,.—o720x, J will 
make them drunk, appears to have been 
substituted for DJavx, 7 will break 
them in pieces, Which is found in 
twenty-three MSS., and has been ori- 
ginally in thirteen more at least ; is 


the reading of three Editions; and 
is supported by the Targ., which 
translates, poor. The difference 
consists simply in the exchange of 3 
for 3, many instances of which occur 
in the Hebrew text. In favour of 
rv, Hitzig properly adduces the use 
of the preposition 1: 128 would have 
been followed by the accusative, or 
by the preposition 12. 

7. The mind of the prophet is now 
led back, by the Spirit of inspiration, 
from the signal destruction of the 
Edomites, to review God’s ancient fa- 
vours towards the Jewish people, not- 
withstanding their demerit, in order 
to derive encouragement to those 
who should live in the final disper- 
sion, still to trust in his mercy, and 
to furnish them with arguments to be 
employed in their devotional applica- 
tions for its renewed and glorious 
exercise. From this verse to the end 
of the following chapter, they are 
provided with a formulary of con- 
fession and supplication, couched, as 
Lowth observes, in the elegiac form, 
pathetic and elegant. 

8. The expression of a reasonable 
expectation of what the Jewish nation 


CHAP. LXIII.] 


ISATAH. 


453 


Children that will not act falsely : 


So he became their Saviour. 


9 In all their affliction, he was not an adversary, 
For the Angel of his Presence saved them ; 
In his love and in his pity he redeemed them ; 
_ . And he took them up, and carried them all the days of old. 
10 Yet they rebelled, and grieved his Holy Spirit, 
So that he was turned to be their foe ; 


should have proved, considering the 
peculiar relation into which they had 
been brought to Jehovah. 

9. The words Ἢ 8? Ona have 
occasioned no small diversity of in- 
terpretation. The textual reading N° 
is expressed in the LXX, Syr., Targ., 
and Vulg.; and has the suffrages of 
Saadias, Jarchi, and other Rabbins, 
who render, “ In all their affliction he 
did not afflict them,” 2.6. so as to 
abandon them to it, or leave them 
in it, without pity or deliverance. 
In such case, 072 must be supplied 
after 1% from the pronom. affix in 
omy, The 1 in 772 will then assume 
the causal signification, and introduce 
the reason why they were not left in 
trouble. Thus also Kocher, Micha- 
6115, Déderlein, Dathe, Tingstadius, 
Hensler, Gesenius, Maurer, Booth- 
royd, Jones, and Noyes. 1%, Auri- 
villius and Michaelis take to be an 
intensive masculine noun, used in 
contrast with the preceding feminine 
“a, and so expressive of extreme 
distress. The latter writer compares 
2 Cor. iv. 8, θλιβόμενοι, aAN οὐ στενο- 
xopovpevot. I prefer the verbal sig- 
nification ; only attaching to the word 
the idea of hostility, or opposition, 
so as to crush or destroy. To the 
Keri 12 5, there was affliction to him, or 
he was afficted, which is found in the 
text of eleven MSS., and was in five or 
six more originally, and is exhibited 
in two of the earliest editions, it is 
properly objected, that, to furnish this 
sense, the order of the words must 
have been 1? ἼΞ, and not 12 1. Comp. 
2 Sam. i. 26. The latter interpre- 
tation. however, is preferred by Moller, 
Jenour, v. d. Palm, Scholz, our own 
and other translators.—By v2 ἼΝ is 
meant the ANGEL or MESSENGER, by 


way of eminence, so frequently re- 
ferred to in the Mosaic writings ; 
who is therein represented as pos- 
sessing the Divine Name; and who 
is spoken of interchangeably with 
JEHOVAH himself. The combination 
of the terms Angel of his presence, is not 
intended to convey the idea of an 
angel accustomed to stand in the 
Divine presence, but the Messenger 
in and through whose person the Deity 
was manifested to ancient Israel ;— 
the Divine personal Representative. 
Comp. Exod. xxiii. 20—23, xxxili. 14, 
15, in which latter passage 022, faces, 
or presence, by itself, is obviously used 
in the highest personal sense. 

10. wWIRIM, His Holy Spirit, is like- 
wise to be taken here in a personal 
sense, forasmuch as personal suscep- 
tibility and actions are distinctly 
ascribed to him. The simple idea of 
moral purity, or opposition to all 
moral evil, as existing in the Divine 
mind, falls altogether short of the 
conceptions suggested by the phrase 
in this and numerous parallel pas- 
sages of Scripture. The attribute of 
holiness is predicated of the Spirit 
of God, because he is the Source and 
Author of that holiness which is 
found in the creatures. Comp. for 
the sentiment, Eph. iv. 30. The 
statement made in the latter hemi- 
stich is not at variance with that 
made at the beginning of the pre- 
ceding verse, 28 not being used in 
the same intensive sense as 1%, but, 
as explained by D2 077 following, 
merely expressing such a degree of 
opposition as was necessary to ac- 
count for the “2%, affliction, with 
which the Israelites were visited, with 
a view to their moral benefit. 


ke 


484 


He fought against them. 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. LXIII. 


11 But he remembered the ancient days—Moses and his people. 
Where is he that brought up from the sea the shepherds of his 


flock ? 


Where is he that put his Holy Spirit within them ? 


12 That made his glorious arm to go forth at the right hand of 


Moses ; 


Dividing the waters before them, 

To make for himself an everlasting name ? 
13 That led them through the deeps ? 

Like a horse in the desert, they stumbled not. 
14 As the cattle descend into the valley, 

So the Spirit of Jehovah led them to rest: 


11, Gesenius, Hitzig, and Scholz, 
consider θυ, his people, to be the no- 
minative to =P); but, besides its 
being too remote in position, it “is 
not so natural as a reference to the 
preceding antecedent. ‘ny mn is 
merely an asyndeton, of which several 
occur in Isaiah, see chap. xxvii. 4; so 
that, although the text of the LXX. 
exhibits nothing corresponding to 
mn, there is no reason to regard it 
as a gloss. ὑπῆν, his servant, (instead 
of Va», his people,) the reading of two 
MSS. and one ancient edition, sup- 
ported by the Syriac, though a very 
natural combination with the name 
‘of Moses, is not critically entitled to 
adoption.—Mention having been made 
of the Divine interposition in the 
days of Moses, the Jews of the final 
dispersion are represented as abruptly 
inquiring where God now was? there 
being no such visible interference on 
their behalf. The description ori- 
ginated by these inquiries is continued 
to the end of ver. 14; and is imme- 
diately followed by earnest suppli- 
cations, appeals, and expostulations, 
having a similar deliverance for their 
object.—As nearly sivty MSS., and 
little short of forty printed editions, 
together with others in the margin, 
and the Vulg., read ‘v4, shepherds, in 
the plural, I cannot but regard the 
particle ns as the sign of the accu- 
sative, designed to qualify or shew 
the reference of the pronominal affix 
in 0990, which is here used anticipa- 


tively, as in Aramaic. Or if, with a 
very ancient MS. of Kennicott, and 
one of De Rossi’s, celebrated for its 
accuracy, and the LXX., Arab., and 
Syr., we omit the affix Ὁ, which might 
easily have originated in the following 
word 0% beginning with the same 
letter, we arrive at the same conclu- 
sion. In this case “the shepherds” 
will be Moses and Aaron. Comp. Ps. 
Ixxvii. 20. The pronominal reference 
in ia is to Nk preceding; and this 
being a collective, I have rendered 
it in the plural, into which it is 
changed, ver. 12. 1727 is not here 
to be taken in a personal sense, as in 
ver. 10, but means, as in other pas- 
sages in which giving, pouring out, 
putting, taking away, &c. are combined 
with the phrase, the operative influence 
of the Holy Spirit. The extraordinary 
or miraculous gifts which were vouch- 
safed to ancient Israel seem specially 
intended. See Numb. xi. 17; Neh. 
ix. 20. 

12—14. The exodus and passage 


through the wilderness to Canaan are_ 


prominently brought out, in order 
the more forcibly to advance the fol- 
lowing appeals. By 7279, desert, is 
here meant a level surface, uninter- 
rupted by rocks, clefts, gullies, &c. to 
impede animals in their course, such 
as is frequently met with, to an 
almost boundless extent, in many 
countries of the East. Rough and 
rugged as might be the rocks at the 
bottom of the Red Sea, they proved 


CHAP. LXIII.] 


ISAIAH. 


455 


Thus thou didst lead thy people, 
To make for thyself a glorious name. 


15 


Look down from heaven, and behold 


From thy holy and glorious habitation ; 
Where is thy zeal, and thy might? 
Are the sounding of thy bowels and thy compassion towards 


me restrained ? 


16 Surely Thou art our Father, 


Though Abraham taketh no notice of us, 
And Israel doth not acknowledge us: 
Thou, O Jehovah! art our Father, our Redeemer ; 


Thy name.is from eternity. 
17 
ways ? 


Why, O Jehovah! hast thou made us to wander from thy 


Why hast thou hardened our heart, that we should not fear 


thee ? 


Return, for the sake of thy servants, 
The tribes of thine inheritance. 


no obstacle to the progress of the 
Israelites. One MS., the LXX., Arab., 
Syr., Targ., and Vulg., read 727, thou 
didst lead them, from ™2; but the 
same idea of leading is implied in 
the common reading, which is the 
Hiph. of ™:, fo rest. The second 
hemistich of ver. 14, embodies the 
idea in the form of direct address, and 
thus paves the way for the appeals, 
ver. 15, το. 

15. A powerful argument is here 
drawn from the tenderness of parental 
affection, as formerly displayed in so 
signal a manner in behalf of the nation. 
Instead of the-plural ὙΠ 533, eighteen 
MSS., originally three, two editions, 
andallthe ancient versions, read 7n}23 ; 
and many more MSS. and editions 
exhibit the word in a defective form. 

16. The hereditary descent of the 
Jews from Abraham, and their de- 
pendence upon his merits, and those 
of Isaac and Jacob, form the proudest 
grounds of boasting among them at 
the present day, as they did in the 
time of our Lord, Matt. iii. 9; John 
viii. 39. See Wetstein on the former 
passage. When converted, they shall 


be ashamed of all such confidence, 
and glory in Jehovah alone. For Ὁ, 
in the acceptation, taking care or notice 
of, regarding, &e. see Gen. xxxix. 6 ; 
Job ix; 21 ;, Ps..cxliv. 3. 

17. Though the language of this 
verse appears to advance a charge 
against Jehovah, it is merely designed 
to indicate the deep earnestness of 
the suppliants. That they do not in 
reality ascribe their moral deviation 
and obduracy to the exertion of any 
positive, direct, or internal influence 
on the part of God, is evident from 
the tenor of the petition which is 
immediately added. Because of their 
wickedness, he had withdrawn from 
them his favour, and left them in 
circumstances from which they took 
occasion to pursue their own ways— 
the inevitable results of which were 
spiritual blindness and induration. 
During a period of nearly eighteen 
centuries they have continued in this 
awful condition — the subjects of 
abandonment, unbelief, and delusion. 
Compare the case of Pharaoh, Exod. 
vii. 3, 18, viii. 15, 32; Rom. ix. 18 ; 
and for a similar use of Hiphil, Ps. 


456 


ISAIAH. 


{CHAP. LXIY. 


18 It was a short time thy holy people were in possession ; 
Our adversaries have trodden down thy sanctuary. 

19 We have been as those over whom thou never didst rule, 
Who were not called by thy name. 


exix. 10, cxli. 4; Jer. iv. 10. For an 
effectual recovery out of this state, 
they now pray that the Divine favour 
might be restored. 

18, 19. The Jews urge, as a further 
reason for their restoration, the com- 


paratively short period during which 
they had been in possession of Canaan, 
the long duration of their’ rejection, 
and the desecration of the holy temple 
by the enemies of the Most High. 
Comp. Luke xxi. 24. 


CHAPTER LXIV. 


This chapter contains further arguments and confessional pleadings in favour 


of a restoration. 


The Jews pray for a renewed manifestation of the Divine 


power in the destruction of their enemies, who, as such, are represented as 
the adversaries of Jehovah, 1, 2; to which they are encouraged by reflecting 
on the unparalleled interposition which the nation experienced in Egypt, 
3, 4, and on the constancy of the Divine conduct towards all who act 
righteously, 5. They confess the deplorable circumstances to which their 
sins have reduced them, 6, 7 ; re-assert their original relationship to God, 
8, 9 ; and finally appeal to the desolate state of the Holy Land, the sight of 
which could not but move him to interfere for their deliverance, 10—12. 


1 O THAT thou wouldst rend the heavens, that thou wouldst come 


down ! 


That the mountains might quake at thy presence ! 


2 As fire kindleth the dry twigs, 


And as fire causeth the water to boil ; 


1—3. I have followed our Common 
Version, the LXX., Vulg., and Syr., 
in departing from the Masoretic di- 
vision of the chapters, according to 
which the words AT Dw AYN 
32 ONT PID are very improperly 
made to conclude chapter lxiii—The 
heavens are regarded as an outspread 
tent, that required to be rent in order 


that its occupant might suddenly rush 
forth in a case of emergency. 1733, the 
Niph. of 5, to tremble, be shaken; Arab. 


U; 1)» an earthquake ; LXX. τρόμος 


λήψεται; Targ. % This derivation 
suits the connexion better than that 
from 53, to flow. The scene referred 
to is that at Sinai, when the Lord 


CHAP. LXIY.] 


ISATAH. 


457 


So make known thy name to thine adversaries, 
That the nations may tremble at thy presence. 
3 When thou didst terrible things that we expected not, 
Thou camest down ; the mountains quaked at thy presence. 
4 Never had men heard, nor perceived by the ear, 
Neither had eye seen a God besides thee, 
That would act for him that waited for him. 
5 Thou meetest him that rejoiceth and doeth righteousness ; 
Them that remember thee in thy ways: 
Though thou art angry, because we have sinned, 
Yet because they are everlasting, we shall be saved. 
6 Weare, all of us, as an unclean thing, 


descended in fire, and the whole 
mount quaked greatly, Exod. xix. 18. 
By the action of fire on dry twigs or 
brushwood, as also on water, noise is 
produced, and thereby the effect of 
the phenomena heightened. That by 
Dan, ¢wigs are meant, has been shewn 
by Gesenius ; with whom Hitzig, 
Maurer, and Scholz concur. Comp. 


the Arab. eed; lenis strepitus, which 


Saadias here employs. 

4, None of the gods of the nations 
had ever appeared to deliver his 
votaries, as Jehovah had done for the 
salvation of his people. Comp. Deut. 
iv. 7. The Apostle cites the passage, 
with considerable verbal variety, 1 
Cor. ii. 9, in apt illustration of his 
position, that while no. real inter- 
vention for the impartation of saving 
wisdom had been experienced by those 
who followed human systems of philo- 
sophy, such had been graciously 
vouchsafed to the Apostles, for the 
benefit of mankind. } Mwy, Zo do or act 
for, has here the sense of interposing 
for the good of any one. 

5. 228, to meet either in a hostile or 
in a friendly sense. Here the latter 
isthemeaning. The latter hemistich, 
Lowth and others think, has been 
greatly corrupted ; and several me- 
thods have been tried to restore the 
text to its pristine state. The whole 
difficulty is created by the words 
div ἘΠῚ. Some consider the pronoun 
Dy to refer to sizs, or punishments, 


understood, and explain o3» of the 
long period during which they had 
continued ; but the most natural re- 
ference is to 027), the masculine ante- 
cedent in the preceding hemistich ; 
and this our translators no doubt had 
in view, when they gave the rendering, 
“tn those is continuance.” The 3 is 
the Beth essentia, which expresses the 
reality of any thing, and, in the 
present case, gives emphasis to the 
personal pronoun, which stands, as 
frequently, for the substantive verb. 
ory stands elliptically for Di» IW, as 
Ps. Ixxxix. 2, 5, 38. The } in Dw) 
marks the apodosis, to which there 
is an implied protasis in 073. This 
I have expressed in the version by 
the word “because,” which supersedes 
the necessity of rendering, “therefore 
we shall be saved.” 7 is not here an 
interjection, but an hypothetical par- 
ticle, putting the fact, in order to 
reason from it. The meaning of the 
whole is this: though we are now 
punished on account of our trans- 
gressions, yet as the ways in which 
God manifests his goodness are ever- 
lasting, we may confidently hope for 
deliverance. That “the ways of God” 
signify his gracious dealings with 
men, as well as the course of life 
which he requires of them, see chap. 
lv. 8, 9. 

6. ow 123, LXX, ῥάκος ἀποκαθημένης. 


Vulg. pannus menstruate. Arab. $c, 
the monthly course of females. 


458 ISATAH. 


And all our righteous deeds as a menstruous cloth ; 
We, all of us, fade like a leaf, 


And our iniquities, like the wind, have carried us away. 


[CHAP. LXV. 


7 Moreover, there is none that calleth on thy name, 
That stirreth up himself to cleave to thee ; 
Therefore thou hast hid thy face from us, 
And made us to melt away through our iniquities. 
8 Yet now, O Jehovah! Thou art our Father ; 
We are the clay, and Thou art our Former ; 
We are, all of us, the work of thy hand. 
9 Be not angry, O Jehovah! to excess ; 
Neither remember iniquity for ever : Ξ 
Behold! look, we beseech thee ; we are, all of us, thy people. 


10 Thy holy cities are a desert ; 
Zion is a desert ; 
Jerusalem a desolation. 


11 Our holy and our beauteous house, 
In which our fathers praised thee, 


Has been burned with fire ; 


And every one of our objects of desire has been destroyed. 
12 Wilt thou refrain at these things, O Jehovah! 
Wilt thou keep silence, and afflict us to excess ? 


8. THY, zow, is here used aitiologi- 
cally, and not as a particle of time. 

10. FOR W, thy holy cities, Vitringa 
and Rosenmiller interpret of the 
upper and lower cities of Jerusalem, 
on the ground that the metropolis 
alone is honoured with the designation 
holy ; but the fact that the same term 


is applied to the borders of Canaan, Ps. 
Ixxviil. 54, shews that cities may here 
mean those of the Holy Land generally. 
The picture exhibited of the state of 
Palestine, in this and the following 
verse, is still faithfully correct, as it 
has been for numerous ages past. 


CHAPTER LXV. 


Jehovah responds in this chapter to the supplicants by whom he had been 


addressed in the preceding section. 


He first shews them, for their en- 


couragement, that he had conferred his favour on the Gentiles who had 
made no application to him, and to whom he had stood in no coyvenant- 
relation, 1; and then accounts for his having punished the Jews, by 


CHAP. LXV.] 


ISAIAH. 


459 


describing both the idolatrous and pharisaical periods of their history, 2—7, 
His sparing them as a people, with a view to their ultimate restoration, is 
next adverted to; and distinct promises of such restoration are given, 
accompanied with fearful denunciations against those who should prefer 
a life of worldliness and irreligion to the enjoyment of the privileges and 
blessings of the Gospel, 8—15. The rest of the chapter is occupied with 
a glowing description of the happy circumstances of the Millennial Church, 


1 [ HAVE listened to them that asked not; 
I have been found by them that sought me not ; 
I have said, Behold me! Behold me! 
To a nation not called by my name. 
2 I have stretched out my hands continually to a rebellious 


people, 


That walked in a way that was not good, 
According to their own devices ; 

3 A people that continually provoked me to my face ; 
Sacrificing in the gardens, and burning incense on the tiles ; 


1. That these words are spoken of 
the Gentiles who were received into 
the church, on the introduction of 
Christianity, is obvious, both from the 
character here given of them as con- 
trasted with that of the Jews, and 
from the citation of the passage Rom. 
x. 20, 21, with direct and express ap- 
plication to the rejection of the latter, 
and the adoption of the former to be 
the people of God. 12 expresses the 
result of application to God in prayer: 
the granting of the things prayed for. 
LXX. ἐμφανὴς ἐγενήθην. In xv, the 
accusative of the person is understood. 
Two or three codices have >. The 
ingemination, ‘27°27, dehold me! be- 
hold me! or here I am, here I am, is 
peculiarly emphatic, and expresses the 
greatest readiness to impart relief to 
the needy. 3, zation, is here used as 
a collective noun to denote the Gen- 
tiles generally. 282 xyp, Lowth, Booth- 
royd, Jehour, and Noyes, improperly 
interpret of invoking, or calling upon 
the name of God. ‘The meaning is, 
that the Gentiles had never been 
called the people of Jehovah; they had 
stood in no such relation to him. 

2. God had continually invited the 


Jews to return and enjoy his favour, 
but they contumaciously rejected his 
mercy. WN, xot good, is a λιτότης 
for 11, bad, wicked. 

3,4. This and the two following 
verses contain a specification of the 
different ways in which the Jews had, 
at different periods of their history, 
evinced their opposition to the Divine 
will, and rendered themselves liable to 
the punishments that had been in- 
flicted upon them. Their idolatries 
had been of the most open and bare- 
faced description—7 35 9». Nothing 
could have been more daring. By 
“gardens” are meant groves, such as 
those in which the heathen were ac- 
customed to worship their idols. See 
chap. 1. 29, Ixvi. 17. By 0222, some 
suppose altars built with drichs are 
intended ; but it is more probable we 
are to understand by the term, the 
tiles of the roofs, on which the Jews 
poured out libations to the host of 
heaven. See Jer. xix. 13; Zeph. i. 5. 
Gesenius, however, is rather inclined 
to adopt the opinion of Rosenmiiller, 
that the Prophet refers to a custom of 
the Babylonians, of offering incense 
to certain of their deities on baked 


400 ISAIAH. [CHAP. LXV. 


4 That sat in the graves, 

And spent the nights in the sepulchres ; 

That ate the flesh of swine, 

And in whose vessels was the broth of unclean meats : 
5 That said, Keep by thyself; come not near me ; 

For I am holier than thou. 

These were a smoke in my nose ; 

A fire that burned continually. 
6 Behold! it is recorded before me: 


I will not keep silence, but will requite ; 


bricks, such as those on which are in- 
sculped magical figures, and arrow- 
headed characters.—Allusion is next 
made to the means to which they re- 
sorted in order to procure a know- 
ledge of secret and future events,— 
the practice of necromancy and divi- 
nation. This they expected to obtain 
from the spirits of the dead, which 
they imagined still to hover about 
their tombs; and for this purpose 
they frequented, during the dark 
hours of night, the graves and se- 
pulchral excavations in which their 
bodies were deposited. The latter 
are called Os), reserved, hidden, con- 
cealed places, from their darkness and 
obscurity. ΠΤΧΧ, σπήλαια. From the 
addition made by the translators 
of this version, κοιμῶνται διὰ ἐνύπνια, 
it would appear, that they supposed 
there was a reference in the passage 
to the superstitious belief of the 
Egyptians, that Isis appeared in 
dreams to those who slept in her 
temples, and revealed to them the 
knowledge of medicine and future 
events. Diod. Sic. i. 25, 55 ; Strabo, 
xvii. and other literary references in 
Gesenius.—As swine were offered in 
sacrifice to Ceres and other heathen 
deities, and their flesh was eaten at 
the sacrificial feasts,.the Jews, imita- 
ting the idolatrous rite, violated the 
express prohibition, Levit. xi. 7.—?}, 
broth, is derived from ΡΒ, ¢o ¢ear, or 
pluck in pieces, a8 flesh, in order to its 
being boiled into broth. ?y9, the read- 
ing of the Keri, and of a few MSS. 
and editions, has the same significa- 
tion. Whether this broth was used 
by the Jews as food, for lustration, or 


for presentation to idols, cannot be 
determined. 

5. Having, in the preceding verse, 
specified the sins for which the Jews 
were notorious, during what may be 
called the idolatrous period of their 
history, Jehovah now portrays their 
character during the self-righteous | 
period, or that which succeeded the Ὁ 
return from the captivity,—including 
Pharisaism, Talmudism, and modern 
Judaism. Comp. chap. lvii. 1—3 ; 
Luke xviii. 11; Rom. x.3. The hy- 
pothesis of Gesenius, that the refer- 
ence here is to purifications in use 
among the ancient Parsees, or those 
who professed the Medo-Persian reli- 
gion, seems altogether destitute of 
probability. For the phrase 728 2, 
lit. approach to thyself, comp. the Arabic 
ENS] EW, to thee, to thee ; signify- 
ing, “Keep away from me.”—7 DOT), 
I am holy in respect to thee, 1. 6. taking 
thy character into the account. It is 
equivalent to 722 Mw, am more holy 
than thou. Thus the Targ. 30 8721. 
The conceit of imaginary holiness, ac- 
cruing from certain external relations, 
and the performance of certain ritual 
or bodily exercises, such as the Jews 
have long entertained, and which is 
also awfully prevalent among nominal 
Christians, Jehovah here declares to 
be peculiarly offensive to him. 

6, 7. For 287 72:3, ἐξ is written before 
me, corap. Jude, ver.4 ; of πάλαι mpoye- 
γραμμένοι εἰς τοῦτο τὸ κρίμα. The 
phrase is forensic, denoting the sen- 
tence which has been pronounced 
upon a criminal, and which is written 
in a book or posted up in some public 


CHAP. LXV.] 


ISAIAH. 


461. 


Yea, I will requite into their bosom, 
7 Your iniquities and the iniquities of your fathers together, 


saith Jehovah ; 


That burned incense upon the mountains, 
And dishonoured me upon the high places ; 
I will even measure their former demerit into their bosom. 


8 Thus saith Jehovah: 


As when new wine is found in the cluster, 
And men say, Destroy it not, for a blessing is in it: 
So will I act in behalf of my servants ; 


Not to destroy the whole. 


9 For I will cause a seed to go forth from Jacob, 
And from Judah, inheritors of my mountains ; 
Yea, my chosen shall inherit it, 

And there shall my servants dwell. 


10 


Sharon also shall become a fold for flocks, 


And the valley of Achor a resting-place for herds ; 
For the benefit of my people that have sought me. 


11 But as for you, that forsake Jehovah, 


place ; and the certainty of its execu- 
tion.—The Jews, by their obstinate 
rejection of the Messiah, anf the 
iniquities which have sprung out of 
that rejection, have no less than their 
progenitors exposed themselves to the 
Divine indignation ; and upon them 
hath been visited the full amount of 
national guilt, which they had for 
ages been contracting. Comp. Matt. 
XXill. 31—39. nina is the term usually 
employed in application to the elevated 
places on which the idolatrous Israel- 
ites offered sacrifices and incense, in 
imitation of the heathen, who were 
accustomed to select nivaa, high hills, as 
localities peculiarly favourable to the 
worship of the host of heaven. ‘ya 
signifies both work, and the wages or 
reward of labour. It is here used to 
denote the punishment which the 
Jews have merited by their national 
transgressions, which, as a long series, 
stretched back into former times. The 
phrase, “measuring intothe bosom,” is 
takenfrom the Oriental custom of carry- 
ing articles in the ample bosom of the 
hyke or cloak, and means to furnish 


abundantly ; or, as in the present 
case, to administer full punishment. 
Comp. Ps. Ixxix. 12; Jer, xxx. 18. 
8—10. The Jewish people are here 
compared toa cluster of grapes, which, 
from their being so bad as to be unfit 
for use, are upon the point of being 
thrown away. Subsequent to the de- 
struction of Jerusalem by the Romans, 
they seem as if they had been devoted 
to utter destruction. The “blessing” 
denotes the Divine favour which is 
still in store for them as the descend- 
ants of the patriarchs. See Rom. xi. 
28, and the note on chap. vi. 13. The 
future happy occupation of Palestine 
by a regenerated race of Jews is here 
clearly predicted. δ and WW are 
collectives. It is to the celebrated 
fertility of Sharon and Achor that 
special reference is had. The former 
was situated in the west, and the other 
in the east, of cis-Jordanic Canaan. 
They are adduced as samples of the 
whole. ὍΣ is the Dat. commodi; for 
the advantage of my chosen people. 
11. As the persons addressed in 
this and the four following verses are 


3M 


402 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. LXV. 


And forget my holy mountain ; 
That prepare a table for Fortune, 


: And fill a libation to Fate: 
12 


I will even appoint you to the sword ; 


And ye shall all of you bow down to the slaughter ; 
Because I called, but ye answered not ; 

I spake, but ye hearkened not: 

But would do that which is evil in my sight, 


contrasted with those who are to 
return and enjoy the Divine favour in 
Palestine, it seems more natural to 
regard them as the impenitent and 
worldly portion of the Jews who shall 
live at the time of the restoration, 
rather than the idolatrous part of the 
nation that lived before the Babylonish 
captivity. Such construction alone 
fully suits the close and immediate 
coherence of the argument. In such 
case, as there is no reason to imagine 
that any of the Jews will again become 
actual idolaters, all attempts to ex- 
plain 3, Gad, and °%, Meni, of idols 
literally taken, are aside from the 
point. On few words in the He- 
brew Bible, perhaps, has more been 
written, and certainly on none have 
the opinions advanced afforded less 
satisfaction. I refer those who may 
be desirous of reviewing them to Vi- 
tringa, Rosenmiiller, and Gesenius ; 
and the works quoted by these authors. 
That the terms may have been bor- 
rowed from the nomenclature of idol- 
aters may be admitted. 3, which 
signifies, Fortune, good luck, prosperity, 
is cognate with the Arab. d>, of the 
same signification; which Rabbi Moses 
Haccohen asserts was a name given 
by the Arabs to the planet Jupiter. 
They also gave to this planet the 


name ys Y) dawl, dona fortuna major. 


Comp. 722=72 83, “ prosperity cometh,” 
Gen. xxx. 11; and Ἢ 993, the place 
where the god Fortune was worshipped 
at the foot of Mount Hermon, Josh. 
xi. 17. In the common text of the 
LXX. this word is rendered δαιμόνιον, 
and the following by τύχη ; but, accord- 
ing to the version of Jerome, and the 
MSS. Pachom, and I. D. 11, the order 
of the words must originally have 


been the reverse. 29 has been re- 
ferred by some to Μήνη, the moon, by 
others to Venus; but the word is 
more probably related to the Arab. 


$lio, the name of an idol worshipped 


“by the ancient Arabs. Comp. ἄκλο, 


Jutum, chance, destiny ; from the verb 
m2, to number, appoint, allot, being em- 
ployed, ver. 12, with obvious reference 
to the signification of °29, with which 
it forms an elegant paronomasia ; and 
from the close relation in which the 
terms Gad and Meni stand to each 
other, the idea of Fute or Destiny is 
most likely that which the latter is 
designed to convey. The description 
admirably suits worldly and infidel 
charaeters, who not only have no re- 
gard for, but laugh at, religion ; have 
no god but riches, and regard human 
affairs as governed by chance. <Ac- 
cording to Jerome, the custom to 
which allusion is made, -obtained 
among the Egyptians, who placed in 
all their cities, on the last day of the 
year, a table full of various kinds of 
provision, and a cup of sweet wine 
mixed with water, either in acknow- 
ledgment of the fertility of the past, 
or to implore the fruitfulness of the 
approaching year. 

12. The Jews who shall prefer the 
pleasures of sin to those of true reli- 
gion embraced by the great body of 
the nation, shall meet with inevitable 
and condign punishment. This pun- 
ishment will, in all probability, be 
inflicted upon them in common with 
the members of the anti-Christian 
confederacy, after their believing 
brethren shall have been securely 
settled in Palestine. “In which I 
had no delight,” z.e, by meiosis, which 
7 utterly abhorred. 


CHAP. LXV.] ISAIAH. 463 


And choose that in which I delighted not. 

Therefore thus saith the Lord Jehovah : 

Behold! my servants shall eat, but ye shall famish ; 
Behold! my servants shall drink, but ye shall have thirst ; 
Behold! my servants shall rejoice, but ye shall be ashamed ; 
‘Behold! my servants shall shuot for gladness of heart, 
But ye shall cry out for sorrow of heart ; 

And shall howl for anguish of spirit. 

And ye shall leave your name for a curse¢o my chosen ; 
For the Lord Jehovah shall kill thee, 

And call his servants by another name. 

So that he that blesseth in the land, 

Shall bless by the faithful God ; 

And he that sweareth in the land, 

Shall swear by the faithful God ; 


13 


14 


15 


16 


Because the former troubles are forgotten, 


13, 14. The contrast in these verses 
is admirably sustained, and possesses 
great energy. 2) 399, lit. goodness of 
heart, but used to express internal 
happiness or delight. Comp. Deut. 
xxviii. 47; Ps. iv. 7. For ὙΠ, see on 
chap. xv. 2. 

15. So signal shall be the punish- 
ment of the infidel Jews, that, in 
future time, should any curse or im- 
precation be pronounced against a 
sinner, none would be more awful in 
its character than that which should 
involve their fate. Comp. Jer. xxix. 
22; Numb. v. 21. Henceforth a Jew 
should only be spoken of as the sub- 
ject of Divine indignation.—Many 
interpreters suppose the name Chris- 
tian to be here intended; and the 
passage has been adduced in support 
of the opinion, that this name was 
given to the disciples at Antioch by 
immediate revelation ; but as no ap- 
pellation is added, it is more correct 
to explain the phrase of the new 
state and character of the converted 
Israelites. See on chap. lxii. 2. The 
Ἢ in 727 is a collective suffix, and, as 
such, is rendered by the LXX, and 
the Targ. in the plural. 

16. By lan. is meant imploring 
blessings for one’s self, and, in this 
case, with the 3 of object, direct 


application to God in acts of religious 
worship. This, »202 following clearly 
shews. Comp. chap. xix. 18, and Jer. 


ee DD 


interpreters, the true God ; Gesenius, 
“ Deus veri, for Deus verus.? To ex- 
press this, however, the phrase should 
have been ΤῸΝ x, ὁ. 6. the God who 
is really such, in opposition to all 
false or fictitious deities. ἸῸΝ has 
reference, not to existence, but to 
promises, engagements, or declara- 
tions; and expresses the veracious- 
ness or fidelity of him of whom it is 
predicated, or the certainty of these 
taking effect. The immediate con- 
nexion shews that this must be the 
meaning of the attribute as here 
ascribed to Jehovah. The final resto- 
ration of the Jews will furnish one of 
the most illustrious instances of the 
accomplishment of the promises and 
predictions of Scripture, and, conse- 
quently, the most abundant proof of 
the faithfulness of Him by whom 
they were delivered. It is thus the 
words of Christ are to be understood, 
Rev. iii. 14, τάδε λέγει ὁ ᾿Αμὴν, ὁ μάρτυς 
ὁ πιστὸς καὶ ἀληθινὸς. The rendering 
of some, however, “the God AMEN,” 
which they apply to our Saviour, is 
unwarranted by the Hebrew text. 


464 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. LXV. 


And because they are hid from mine eyes. 


17 


For, behold! I create new heavens, and a new earth; 


And the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind. 


18 


But rejoice, and exult for ever in regard to that which I create ; 


For, behold! I create Jerusalem an exultation, 


And her people a joy. 
19 
And rejoice in my people ; 


For I will exult in Jerusalem, 


And there shall no more be heard in her 
The sound of weeping, or the sound of outcry. 


20 


There shall no more be there a child of a few days, 


Nor an aged man, that hath not filled up his days ; 
For the youth shall die a hundred years old, 
And the sinner of a hundred years shall be accursed. 


21 


They shall even build houses, and inhabit them ; 


And plant vineyards, and eat the fruit of them. 


22 


They shall not build, and another inhabit ; 


They shall not plant, and another eat ; 
For as the days of a tree shall be the days of my people; 
And my chosen shall enjoy the work of their hands. 


17,18. Creation is here to be un- 
derstood not physically, but in a 
civil and religious sense. The subject 
is Jerusalem and the Jews. Their 
restoration will be like a fresh spring- 
ing into existence ; and the constitu- 
tion to be established among them 
will be entirely different from their 
ancient economy. Comp. Rev. xxi. 1. 
Vx is here to be taken as the accusa- 
tive, ix regard to, as it respects that, 
&c. Comp. Judg. viii. 15. 

19. Now follows, to the end of the 
chapter, an exquisitely beautiful and 
truly graphic description of the Mil- 
lennial happiness of the Jewish 
people. Longevity, the undisturbed 
possession and enjoyment of the 
blessings of Providence, the speediest 
answer to prayer, and the most com- 
plete harmony and peace, shall dis- 
tinguish that blissful period. 


20, nvin; LXX. ἐκεῖ; Syr. wl; 
Saad. lin, there. In this case the 
preposition has no more force than in 


pom, map, Opp, &e. By om nv, an 
infant of days, is meant one that is 
only a few days old, or who has, at 
least, not reached the age of a year. 
jen Oe Ὃν are connected, so that the 
pronoun Vx, and the pronom. affix in 
va, refer to both. The child shall 
live to see a good old age, and the 
aged themselves shall reach the goal 
of antediluvian longevity. So general 
shall be this extraordinary length of 
human life, that not only shall he be 
accounted a youth who dies at the age 
of a hundred years, but his being cut 
off at that early period shall be 
regarded as a special judgment on 
account of his sins. 

22. Some trees, such as the oak, 
the terebinth, and the banian, reach 
the age of a thousand years. The 
oak, for instance, grows for three 
hundred years, retains its full vigour 
for two hundred more, and then takes 
five hundred to decay, the process of 
which is during most of that period 
imperceptible. 


CHAP. LXVI.] 


23 They shall not toil in vain, — 


ISAIAH. 


465 


Nor bring forth children for sudden destruction ; 
For they are the seed of the blessed of Jehovah, 


And their offspring with them. 
24 


And it shall be, that before they call, I will answer ; 


While they are yet speaking, 1 will hear. 


25 


The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, 


And the lion shall eat straw like the ox; 
But as for the serpent, dust shall be his food ; 
They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, 


Saith Jehovah. 


23. For 773 


Trt) 


comp. the Arab. Je, 
execratus fuit ; ἅλῳ, maledictio, dire. 


But as the person who incurred a 
curse was regarded as doomed to 
destruction, the ideas of ruin, destruc- 
tion, death, naturally came to be 
attached to it. Chald. xpi), 18 
signifies to tremble, to flee for fear, to 
perish suddenly; hence 7773, speedy, 
sudden destruction. From such pun- 
ishment the children shall be exempt, 
being beloved for the sake of their 
ancestors, to whom Jehovah attached 
a peculiar blessing. Comp. chap. 
lix. 21. 

24. This language is strongly ex- 
pressive of the utmost readiness of 
Jehovah to confer blessings upon his 
people. 


representation of the blessed harmony 
to be realized under the reign of the 
Messiah, which is furnished chap. xi. 
6—9. What was to be more or less 
extensively the effect of the change 
produced on the character of man- 
kind, in proportion to the spread of 
true religion among them, shall be 
fully exhibited during the period of 
the latter-day glory. By πὲ, the 
serpent, in this place, there seems 
every reason to believe that Satan, 
the old seducer and author of discord 
and misery, is meant. During the 
Millennium he is to be subject to the 
lowest degradation. Compare, for the 
force of the phrase fo lick the dust, 
Ps. Ixxii. 9; Mic. vii. 17. This was 
the original doom of the tempter, 
Gen. 111. 14, and shall be fully carried 
into execution, Comp. Rev. xx. 


25. We have here an almost verbal 1—3. 
repetition of the sublime figurative 
--- Ὁ--- - 


CHAPTER LXVI. 


Having in the latter part of the preceding chapter carried forward the atten- 
tion of the Jews to the happiness to be enjoyed by their nation in the 
distant Millennial age, the prophet, before closing his sublime predictions, 

᾿ adverts to certain circumstances which should be connected with the intro- 


duction of that new state of things. 


He anticipates and reprobates the attempt that will be made by the unbeliev- 


466 ISAIAH. [CHAP. LXVI. 


ing portion of the Jews to rebuild their temple, and re-establish their 
ancient ceremonies, 1—3 ; denounces Divine judgments upon them, 4—6 ; 
foretells the sudden and unexpected conversion of the nation, 7—9 ; calls 
upon their Gentile brethren to rejoice with them, 10, 11; promises great 
prosperity and happiness to the converted Israelites, 12—14; shews that 
awful destruction shall overtake those nations that shall oppose themselves 
to the purposes and claims of Jehovah, 15—18 ; predicts a special mission 
of converted Gentiles into different and distant countries, and the recovery 
of all such Jews as remained in them, to the service of God in the land of 
their fathers, 19—21; gives an assurance of the permanence of the new 
Jewish Church, in conjunction and union with that of the Gentiles, 22, 23 ; 
and concludes with an awful representation of the misery of the finally 


impenitent, 24, 


1 Tuus saith Jehovah: 


Heaven is my throne, and the earth is my footstool ; 
Where is the house that ye would build for me ? 
And where is the place of my rest? 

2 All these things hath my hand made ; 
And all these things have been, saith Jehovah : 


But to this man will I look, 


To him that is humble and contrite in spirit, 


And trembleth at my word. 


3 He that slayeth an ox, killeth a man ; 


1, 2. It appears from these verses, 
and that which follows, that, on being 
restored to their own land, and occu- 
pied with the building of Jerusalem, 
some of the Jews will attempt to 
reconstruct their temple, in’ order 
that they may worship in it according 
to the Mosaic ritual. Such an at- 
tempt is here met by the declaration 
that no earthly structure is worthy 
of the transcendent excellence of the 
spiritual and blessed nature of Jeho- 
vah. The Jews have ever been prone 
to glory in, and rest satisfied with, 
external and splendid services; and 
the same disposition will actuate the 
unbelieving portion of them on their 
restoration. To check this disposi- 
tion, the Most High asserts his infi- 
nite superiority, as Creator and Lord 
of the Universe, to everything mate- 
rial, and describes the only temple in 
which he condescends to dwell—the 


heart of the contrite and spiritual 
worshipper. Comp. chap. lvii. 15; 1 
Kings viii. 27—30. Comp. also Rev. 
xxi. 22, where it is expressly declared 
that no temple was visible in the new 
Jerusalem. According to the points, 
DiP2 is in apposition with ΠΤ), but 
all the ancient versions place the 
words in construction. In ver. 2, 9 
is improperly supplied by the LXX., 
Syr., and Lowth. The substantive 
verb ™7 is used absolutely, as in Ps. 
XXxiii. 9; and as ἦσαν in Rev. iv. 11. 
3. Lowth supposes instances of 
extreme wickedness combined with 
hypocrisy to be here intended ; but 
it seems far more in accordance with | 
the spirit of the passage to view it as 
teaching the absolute unlawfulness of 
sacrifices under the Christian dispen- 
sation. When the Jews are converted 
to the faith of Jesus the Son of God, 
they must acquiesce in the doctrine 


CHAP. LXVI.] 


ISATAH. 


467 


He that sacrificeth a lamb, cutteth off the neck of a dog ; 
He that offereth an oblation, offereth swine’s blood ; 
He that maketh a remembrance-offering of incense, blesseth an 


idol. 


As for them, they have chosen their own ways, 

And their soul hath delighted in their abominations. 
4 J also will choose their calamities, 

And bring upon them the things which they dread ; 

Because 1 called, but none answered ; 

I spake, but they did not hearken ; 

But did that which was evil in my sight, 

And chose that in which 1 delighted not. 


5 Hear the word of Jehovah, 
Ye that tremble at his word ! 
Your brethren that hate you, 


And thrust you out for my name’s sake, have said, 


Let Jehovah be glorified ; 


But he shall appear to your joy, 


And they shall be ashamed. 


6 <A voice of tumult from the city! 


A voice from the temple ! 


taught in the ixth and xth chapters 
of the Epistle to the Hebrews, that 
the one offering which he presented 
upon the cross, for ever set aside all 
the animal sacrifices and oblations 
which had been appointed by the law 
of Moses. *Any attempt to revive the 
practice is here declared to be upon a 
par with the cruel and abominable 
customs of the heathen, who offered 
human sacrifices, and such animals 
as the ancient people of God were 
taught to hold in abomination. The 
> of comparison is omitted, as fre- 
quently in poetry ; but is supplied in 
the LXX., Vulg., Targ., Theod., Symm., 
and most modern versions. Its in- 
sertion in the present case would 
weaken the force and vehemence of 
the language. 

4, 5. In retribution of the unbeliev- 
ing and rebellious persistence of the 
Jews in endeavouring to establish the 
old ritual, Jehovah threatens them 
with condign punishment; while 


such of them as may render them- 
selves obnoxious to their brethren by 
receiving the doctrine of the Gospel 
on the subject, have a gracious promise 
of Divine approbation and protection 
given to them. o> oy signify cala- 
mities, vexations, a8 the parallelism 
shews, and as the root ἣν, ¢o act 
repeatedly, vex by improper conduct, evil- 
entreat, &c. naturally suggests. See 
on chap. 111. 4, 12; Targ. ji7724, interi- 
tus eorum. ‘This interpretation is to 
be preferred to ἐμπαίγματα of the 
LXX., and illusiones of the Vulg. 

6. By a remarkable and astounding 
interposition of Jehovah, the scheme 
of the Jews shall be defeated. The 
very temple which they shall be in 
the act of erecting shall be the scene 
of judgment. By 77m 4p, the voice of 
Jehovah, is meant thunder, as in Ps. 
xxix. ; so that, in all probability, the 
projected temple will be destroyed by 
lightning. 


468 
The voice of Jehovah! 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP, LXVI. 


Rendering retribution to his enemies. 
7 Before she was in pain, she brought forth ; 
Before her pangs came upon her, she was delivered of a male. 


8 Who hath heard of such a thing Ὁ 


Who hath seen such things ? 


Is a country in pain in a day? 
Is a nation brought forth at once ? 
Yet Zion hath both been in pain, and hath brought forth her 


sons. 


9 Should I bring to the birth, and not cause to bear? saith 


Jehovah ; 


Should I cause to bear, and yet restrain? saith your God. 


10 Rejoice ye with Jerusalem, 


And exult on her account, all ye that love her ; 
Be exceedingly joyful with her, all ye that mourned for her ; 


11 


That ye may suck, and be satisfied, 


At the breast of her consolations ; 
That ye may press out, and be delighted 
With the abundance of her glory. 


12 For thus saith Jehovah : 


Behold! I will extend to her prosperity like a river, 


And the wealth of the nations like a flooding stream ; 
And ye shall suck them, and shall be carried on the side, 


7—9. The metaphors here taken 
from a woman in travail are fre- 
quently employed by our prophet. 
See chap. xii. 8, xxi. ὃ, xxvi. 18. The 
language forcibly expresses the sudden 
and unexpected reproduction of the 
Jewish nation in their own land in 
the latter day. Compare that of the 
last cited passage in reference to the 
restoration from the captivity in Baby- 
lon. Their future recovery is the 
object of Divine purpose, and every 
providential arrangement shall be 
made for effecting it ; yet the event 
shall be unexpectedly sudden. 

10. m8 expresses the object of joy, 
ἢ. 6. Jerusalem. 

11. ΤΡΌΠΟΣ Ww does not mean the 
breast of Jerusalem, but the Source 
from which her consolations are sup- 
plied. While men shall witness the 


rich enjoyment of the Divine favour 
conferred upon her, they shall be ex- 
cited more earnestly to apply for the 
same blessings. ῬῈ occurs only thrice: 
here, and Ps. 1. 11, lxxx. 14; but ob- 
viously means a copious supply ; or, 
as corresponding to WW, breast, that 
from which such supply is obtained. 
Gesenius derives it from 1%, fo move, 
radiate, flow out like rays, and renders 
full breast. The Soncin. Edit., four 
MSS., and originally nine, read ™, 
brightness ; while the probable reading 
of De Rossi’s MSS. 545, is 7}, the 
word proposed by Lowth. The Targ. 
reads }”, wine, which makes no sense. 
The wild beasts, being full of activity, 
are designated by this term in the 
passages just quoted from the Psalms. 
Symm. and Theod. ἀπὸ πλήθους. 
12. Comp. chap. lx. 4—6. 


CHAP. LXVI.] 


And dandled upon the knees. 
13 
So will I comfort you ; 


ISATAH. 


469 


As one whom his mother comforteth, 


Even in Jerusalem shall ye be comforted. 


14 


And ye shall see, and your heart shall rejoice, 


And your bones shall flourish, like the green herb: 
For the hand of Jehovah shall be known to his servants ; 
But he shall be indignant against his enemies. 


15 


For behold! Jehovah shall come with fire, 


And his chariots shall be as the whirlwind ; 
Causing his anger to return with fury, 


And his rebuke with flames of fire. - 


16 


For with fire shall Jehovah contend, 


And with his sword, with all flesh ; 
And many shall be the slain of Jehovah. 


17 


Those that sanctify themselves, 


And that purify themselves in the gardens after one, 


14. m8 in Yay marks the object 
on which ΠΡ 12 terminates. The anti- 
thesis in this verse is very striking, 
and occasions the following awful 
denunciations of Divine wrath. 

15, 16. These verses describe the 
tremendous judgment to be inflicted 
on the anti-Christian confederacy, to 
which distinct, pointed, and repeated 
reference is made in the prophetic 
Scriptures :—the great battle of Ar- 
mageddon, so graphically set forth, 
Rev. xvi. 14—21, xix. 11—21. The 
figurative language of fire and sword 
is common to all the prophets. 27 
‘ok means to visit with renewed in-: 
flictions of wrath, and points out the 
awfully severe character of the judg- 
ment to be poured out upon the ene- 
mies of the Church of God. 

17. To what species of superstition 
the prophet here refers, it is hard to 
determine. As the verse is likewise 
comminatory, and closely coheres with 
the two preceding, it is obvious that 
the persons intended must belong to 
the same general confederacy against 
the Messiah ; yet, since they are dis- 
tinguished in so very marked a manner 
from the rest, we cannot but conclude, 
that the prophecy points to some 
class of enemies in particular on which 


signal punishment is to be inflicted. 
With respect to language, the only 
words which create any serious diffi- 
culty are FRI Ws.wy, lit. after or Le- 
hind one in the midst. The various 
readings are of little weight, being 
chiefly conjectural, or emendatorial. 
Two MSS., and as it would seem 
another, and apparently two originally, 
read M8 IMR, ove, one, 1. Θ. one by one. 
Instead of 17s the Keri has nms in the 
feminine, which one of De Rossi’s 
MSS. and the Soncin. Edit. exhibit in 
the text; and another MS. of De 
Rossi’s has ΓΝ 3s ΠΝ, which corre- 
sponds, except in gender, with the Syr. 
v yo ¥. 


pao SDD ganar 016 after one, and in 
Sense with ὀπίσω ἀλλήλων, of Symm. 
and Theod. Most of those commen- 
tators who suppose a reference to be 
made to some ancient idolatrous rites, 
are of opinion that by Achad a Syro- 
Phenician idol is meant. This 
opinion is founded on the statement 
of Macrobius, that the Syrians give to 
the sun, as the Supreme Power, the 
name of Adad, the signification of 
which is Ove. Saturnal. i. 23. The 
same name is found in Sanchoniathon, 
(Euseb. Preepar. Evang. lib. x. cap. 
38,) and in Pliny, Nat. Hist, xxxvii. 11, 


3.N 


ATO 


ISATAH. 


[CHAP. LXVI. 


Amidst them that eat swine’s flesh, and the abomination, and 


the mouse ; 


They shall perish together, saith Jehovah. 


The occurrence of nearly the same 
form in the royal names 117, Hadad, 
wi, Hadadezer, 1773, Benhadad, is 
thought to be traceable to the same 
source, and to be little else than the 
Hebrew x, only the aspirate is sup- 
pressed, and the last letter doubled 
for the sake of intensity. Pfeiffer, 
however, in his Dubia vexata, Gesenius, 
Hitzig, and Scholz, consider x, Oxe, 
to be the leader or chief priest in 
an idolatrous procession, whom the 
company of worshippers follow into 
the midst of the temple or grove 
where the rites were celebrated. 
Such a single leader is prominently 
exhibited on the ancient Persian 
monuments. It is not a little re- 
markable, that the term which has 
occasioned so much difficulty in the 
interpretation of the passage is pre- 


cisely that (d=], AcHap, “One,”) 


which the Mohammedans have con- 
tinually on their lips, as distinguishing 
the object of their worship. In mani- 
fest contradiction of the Scripture 
doctrine of the Trinity, the cxiith Surah 


of the Koran teaches, d=} a} "Ὁ ως 


bk οὖν οἱ, ply οἷν, οἱ deal all 
d>| 1,38 , Say, God is (ACHAD) one ; 


the Eternal God ; he begetteth not, nei- 
ther is he begotten ; and he is without an 


equal. This Surah is entitled δ yy 
olay , the Chapter of Salvation, and 


is held in such veneration, that the 
repeating of it is reckoned equal in 
value to that of a third part of the 
whole Koran. It is also a notorious 
fact, that purification forms one of 
the most essential ceremonies of the 
Mohammedan religion. Numerous 
minute rules prescribe the different 
modes in which it is to be performed, 
and especially those ablutions which 
take place at the five periods of daily 


prayer. No act of worship can be 
celebrated if the individual has not 
previously purified himself. The 
obstinate unbelief of the Moham- 
medans, as it respects the Gospel, and 
the extravagant ideas which they en- 
tertain of their own dignity, especially 
as contrasted with Jews, Christians, 
and idolaters, are leading features in 
their character. That they are speci- 
fically intended in this prophecy it 
would be presumptuous absolutely to 
assert ; but I frankly own that I am 
strongly inclined to believe this to be 
the case.— x, after, is here used in 
the religious sense of following, being 
addicted to the worship or service of any 
deity, Comp. 1 Sam. xii. 14, 70x 
DRX WM, and chap. lix. 13, Ws 307 
asx. As no proper sense can be 
brought out of ni, as divided and 
pointed by the Masoretes, I have con- 
strued it with the following 12 ‘Dk, 
&e. This mode of construction is 
further recommended by the following 
considerations : First, neither the 
LXX. ἐν τοῖς προθύροις, nor the Targ. 
ἈΦ IN] ND, has read 712 in the ab- 
solute. Secondly, Symm. and Theod. 
similarly construe, ὀπίσω ἀλλήλων ἐν 
μέσῳ ἐσθίοντων τὸ κρέας χοιρεῖον. 
Thirdly, D928, being without the 
article, shews that it is not in ap- 
position with OTA oOwPNDD, but 
designates a totally different class of 
persons. The meaning is, that those 
who prided themselves on their sepa- 
ration from every thing impure, 
should, in the infliction of Divine 
judgment, be commingled with such 
as they considered to be legally pol- 
luted ; they should, as it is imme- 
diately added, perish together. What 
is meant by 7220, the abomination, does 
not appear. The 722Y is doubtless the 


Arab. pe yor Exp , Jerboa, as it 15 


rendered in the Arabic version, the 
mus jaculus of Linneeus, which 15 much 
larger than the common mouse. It 
abounds, in the fields, and is very 
destructive to them. 


CHAP. LXVI.] 


ISAIAH. 


471 


18 As for me, their works and their thoughts are come [before me] ; 
I will assemble all the nations and the languages ; 
And they shall come and shall see my glory. 


19 


For I will place a sign among them ; 


And those of them that escape I will send to the nations ; 
To Tarshish, Pul and Lud, that draw the bow; 

To Tubal and Javan, to the distant maritime lands, 

That have not heard of my fame, 


Nor seen my glory ; 


18. The first clause of this verse is 
elliptical. The best mode of con- 
struction is to take *238) as the nomin. 
absol.; and, referring 7x32 distribu- 
tively to OMY and nize, to supply 
25), beforé me: the meaning being, that 
the wicked deeds and purposes of the 
nations had now come up for judgment. 
Some supply the verb Ὁ after °25x), 
but this seems less natural. The 
Infin. 37? has here the force of the 
future, and is, with such signification, 
to be connected with the pronoun at 
the beginning of the verse. The glory 
of Jehovah, which the assembled 
nations are to see, is that accruing to 
him from the signal defeat and pun- 
ishment of the enemies of his Church. 
Comp. Ezek. xxxix. 21. 

19. 1is here causal in signification. 
The mx, or sigz, betokens the mira- 
culous overthrow of the hostile army. 
Comp. Exod. x. 2, where 2718 0 is 
used to express the supernatural 
judgments inflicted on the Egyptians. 
ἘΠῚ and O79 refer to D130, the nations, 
ver. 18, and not to the Jews, as many 
have violently supposed. The mis- 
sionaries to be sent to the different 
parts of the world are Gentiles, who 
shall have been present at, but have 
not perished in, the great overthrow in 
Palestine ; and who, brought by what 
they shall have witnessed to acknow- 
ledge the Divine claims, and become 
reconciled to God, shall cheerfully 
obey his mandate, to publish his fame 
among the various nations of the 
earth. The nations specified are ob- 
viously given as a sample. For 
Tarshish, see on chap. xxiii. 10, By 
mB, Pul, it is generally agreed we are 
to understand the island of Phile, and 
the surrounding region on the Nile, 


to the south of Elephantine, and 
about a hundred stadii beyond Syene. 
It was inhabited by the Egyptians 
and Ethiopians in common, lying be- 
tween their two countries. Its name 


in Coptic is TWIAAK or WEAAK, 


and signifies the boundary. Wilkin- 
son describes the extensive ruins with 
which it abounds, which prove its 
importance in ancient times. ὍΣ, Lad, 
occurs as the name of a people de- 
scended from the Egyptians, Gen. x, 
13. They are described as handling 
the bow and the shield, Jer. xlvi. 9, 
and as being mercenaries of the Phe- 
nicians, Ezek. xxvii. 10. From the 
last mentioned circumstance, it is 
probable that they inhabited a region 
stretching from the southern shore of 
the Mediterranean towards Ethiopia. 
Like the Ethiopians, they were cele- 
brated for their expert use of the 
bow, so that πῶ °2v9 is quite in its 
place, and is not open to the suspicion 
raised against it by Lowth. 2», 
Tubal, occurs, as here, in connexion 
with jy, Javan, Gen. x. 2; Ezek. xxvii. 
13; and usually with 7», Meshech, 
a people inhabiting the Moschian 
mountains between Iberia, Armenia, 
and Colchis. The term, doubtless, 
denotes the Zibarenes, oi Τιβαρηνοὶ, 
whom Strabo describes as occupying 
the eastern and south-eastern coasts 
of the Black Sea, xi. 527. The Cir- 
cassians and Mingrelians are, in all 
probability, descended from them. 
2, Lavan, Fonia, originally the name of 
the province so called in Asia Minor, 
but afterwards extended so as to in- 
cludeall Greece. Πάντας τοὺς Ἕλληνας 
Ἰώάονας οἱ βάρβαροι ἐκάλουν. Schol. ad 
Aristoph. Acharn. 106, In the San- 


472 


ISAIAH. 


[CHAP. LXVI. 


And they shall declare my glory among the nations. 


20 


And they shall bring all your brethren, 


From all the nations, an oblation to Jehovah, 
On horses, and in chariots and litters, 

On mules also, and on dromedaries, 

To my holy mountain Jerusalem, saith Jehovah, 
As the children of Israel bring the oblation 

Tn a clean vessel to the house of Jehovah. 


21 And of them also will I take 


For priests and for Levites, saith Jehovah. 


For as the new heavens and the new earth which I will make, 


Shall remain before me, saith Jehovah ; 
So shall your seed, and your name remain. 
23 And it shall be, that from month to month, 


And from sabbath to sabbath, 


scrit, the Greeks are called Yavanas. 
The design of the mission here spe- 
cified is to announce to the different 
nations the glorious interposition of 
Jehovah, of which the persons deputed 
shall have been witnesses, that all 
may be induced to fear him, and de- 
vote themselves to his service. For 
‘wow, my fame, the LXX. and Syr. read 
nd, my name, Which, on this authority 
alone, Lowth adopts. 

20. This verse describes the happy 
result of the announcement as it re- 
gards such Jews as might not yet 
have reached the land of their fathers. 
Looking upon them as belonging to a 
people in whose behalf the Most High 
had signally interposed, the converted 
Gentiles will render them every assist- 
ance requisite for their return. That 
DIT, your brethren, mean the Jews, 
there can be no doubt. By m2 are 
meant /itters or counes, which resemble 
cradles, covered handsomely with 
cloth, so as to protect the persons 
who are carried in them from sun 
and rain. They are borne on camels, 
one on each side, and have openings 
or windows for the admission of light. 
Comp. Numb. vii.3. Sometimes they 
are carried by two camels, one before 
and the other behind. ΠῚ 93 occurs 
only this once, but according to the 
Rabbins, with whom Gesenius and 
other moderns agree, it signifies 


dromedaries, which are so called from 
the dancing or bounding motion which 
they make in walking. Root 13, 173, 
to dance. 

21. From the close of the following 
verse, it appears that the persons here 
spoken of are the recovered Jews 
mentioned in ver. 20, and not the 
Gentiles likewise there specified. The 
language implies that the performance 
of Divine service shall not be re- 
stricted to the tribe of Levi, but shall 
be the common privilege of the whole 
people. Sixty-three MSS., originally 
thirteen more, and perhaps three, 
with all the versions, prefix } to 02). 

22. See chap. lxv. 17, 18, and comp. 
Heb. xii. 26—28. As the Christian 
dispensation is to be permanent, and 
shall not give way to any other, so 
permanent shall be the happy state of 
the restored Israelites. They shall 
never be any more rejected, but shall 
form one fold with the Gentiles, under 
the One Shepherd and Bishop of 
souls, the Great Messiah. Comp. 
chap. lix. 21. 

23. This verse points out the con- 
stancy and regularity with which the 
whole human family shall celebrate 
Divine worship. Comp. Zech. xiv. 
16—19. Not only on the sacred day 
of rest, but on other stated occasions, 
corresponding to those which obtained 
among ancient Israel, men will as- 


CHAP. LXVI.] 


ISATAH. 


473 


All flesh shall come to worship before me, saith Jehovah. 
24 And they shall go forth, and shall see 
The carcases of the men that have rebelled against me ; 


For their worm shall not die, 


Neither shall their fire be quenched : 
But they shall be an abhorrence to all flesh. 


semble to celebrate its rites. 8}, 
before me, is not to be restricted to 
Jerusalem, as it is absolutely impossi- 
ble that all should be able to repair 
thither, but is to be taken in the 
latitude taught in Mal. i. 11; John 
iv. 21—24. ; 

24, The prophet concludes with a 
warning to all to beware of transgres- 
sion, which he derives from the mise- 
rable condition of those that had 
perished in the awful judgment pre- 
dicted, verses 15, 16. The scene is 
laid in the environs of Jerusalem, 
most probably in the valley of Hin- 


THE 


nom, for which see on chap. xxx. 33. 
Pxy, Dan. xii, 2, xy, from the Arab. 


Yo, to repulse, reject, signifies an object 


of abhorrence. The language here em- 
ployed afterwards became proverbial 
among the Jews, in application to the 
punishment of the wicked. See 
Judith xvi. 17 ; Eccles. vii.17. It is 
likewise employed by our Lord to 
express the intensity and eternity of 
suffering in another world, to which 
all shall be subject who prefer indul- 
gence in sin to the fear and service of 
God, Mark. ix. 44, 46, 48. 


END. 


LONDON: 
PRINTED BY RICHARD CLAY, 
BREAD STREET HILL. 


Ὧν the Author. 


In One Vol. 8vo. 14s. cloth. 


THE BOOK OF THE PROPHET JEREMIAH, 


WITH THAT OF 


THE LAMENTATIONS. 


In One Vol. 8vo. 16s. cloth. 


THE BOOK OF THE TWELVE MINOR PROPHETS. 


In One Vol. 8vo. 10s. cloth. 


THE-BOOK OF THE PROPHET EZEKIEL. 


Hamitton, Apams, & Co. 


4 7 a 


ys 
᾿ 


ἢ WE ΠΗ τῷ, AOL 


71h 


rc 


LOM i TE AO, AO 
ἮὟ ἦν ἮΙ OMe 


/ 


$ 
Pe \ 


any ϑυφεήγεν ἐν eked qe oe ae ἡ 1 
any Me Th Pek lage © 
ἢ be 5 y 


-.........-.----. . .-.. 


| 


τῆς 


Date Due 


; “δ᾽ 9 


Wy 59. ἈΠ 


ary 


" 


0561 


Speer Libr 


ary- 


i i 


al Semin 


gi 


Princeton 


= 
© 
σ 
ω 
μι 
~ 
wv 
= 
Qa 
[5] 
= 
Qa 2 
ve 3 
= ας 
Pe 
--- 
° 
x 
Ὁ 
Θ 
ΒΟ] 
vu 
= 
ε- 


so 
oO 
t+ 
a 
wy 
το 
wy) 
τι 
υ 
[ea]